Group versus individual use of power-only EPMcreate as a creativity enhancement technique for requirements elicitation
Abstract Creativity is often needed in requirements elicitation, i.e., generating ideas for requirements, and therefore, techniques to enhance creativity are believed to be useful. How does the size of a group using the Power-Only EPMcreate (POEPMcreate) creativity enhancement technique affect the g...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Sakhnini, Victoria [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Empirical software engineering - Springer US, 1996, 22(2017), 4 vom: 07. Jan., Seite 2001-2049 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:22 ; year:2017 ; number:4 ; day:07 ; month:01 ; pages:2001-2049 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10664-016-9475-z |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2071664043 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2071664043 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503052531.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10664-016-9475-z |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2071664043 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10664-016-9475-z-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 004 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Sakhnini, Victoria |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0002-6817-9081 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Group versus individual use of power-only EPMcreate as a creativity enhancement technique for requirements elicitation |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Creativity is often needed in requirements elicitation, i.e., generating ideas for requirements, and therefore, techniques to enhance creativity are believed to be useful. How does the size of a group using the Power-Only EPMcreate (POEPMcreate) creativity enhancement technique affect the group’s and each member of the group’s effectiveness in generating requirement ideas? This paper describes an experiment in which individuals and two-person and four-person groups used POEPMcreate to generate ideas for requirements for enhancing a high school’s public Web site. The data of this experiment combined with the data of two previous experiments involving two-person and four-person groups using POEPMcreate show that, similar to what has been observed for brainstorming, the size of a group using POEPMcreate does affect the number of raw and new requirement ideas generated by the group and by the average member of the group. The data allow concluding that a two-person group using POEPMcreate generates more raw and new requirement ideas, both per group and per group member or individual, than does a four-person group and than does an individual. This conclusion is partially corroborated by qualitative data gathered from a survey of professional business or requirements analysts about group sizes and creativity enhancement techniques. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Group Size | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Requirement Engineering | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Requirement Engineer | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Experiment Number | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Requirement Idea | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mich, Luisa |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Berry, Daniel M. |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Empirical software engineering |d Springer US, 1996 |g 22(2017), 4 vom: 07. Jan., Seite 2001-2049 |w (DE-627)235946516 |w (DE-600)1401304-6 |w (DE-576)102432406 |x 1382-3256 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:2017 |g number:4 |g day:07 |g month:01 |g pages:2001-2049 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9475-z |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-MAT | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 22 |j 2017 |e 4 |b 07 |c 01 |h 2001-2049 | ||
| author_variant |
v s vs l m lm d m b dm dmb |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:13823256:2017----::ruvruidvdauefoeolemraescetvtehneetehi |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10664-016-9475-z doi (DE-627)OLC2071664043 (DE-He213)s10664-016-9475-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 VZ Sakhnini, Victoria verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-6817-9081 aut Group versus individual use of power-only EPMcreate as a creativity enhancement technique for requirements elicitation 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017 Abstract Creativity is often needed in requirements elicitation, i.e., generating ideas for requirements, and therefore, techniques to enhance creativity are believed to be useful. How does the size of a group using the Power-Only EPMcreate (POEPMcreate) creativity enhancement technique affect the group’s and each member of the group’s effectiveness in generating requirement ideas? This paper describes an experiment in which individuals and two-person and four-person groups used POEPMcreate to generate ideas for requirements for enhancing a high school’s public Web site. The data of this experiment combined with the data of two previous experiments involving two-person and four-person groups using POEPMcreate show that, similar to what has been observed for brainstorming, the size of a group using POEPMcreate does affect the number of raw and new requirement ideas generated by the group and by the average member of the group. The data allow concluding that a two-person group using POEPMcreate generates more raw and new requirement ideas, both per group and per group member or individual, than does a four-person group and than does an individual. This conclusion is partially corroborated by qualitative data gathered from a survey of professional business or requirements analysts about group sizes and creativity enhancement techniques. Group Size Requirement Engineering Requirement Engineer Experiment Number Requirement Idea Mich, Luisa aut Berry, Daniel M. aut Enthalten in Empirical software engineering Springer US, 1996 22(2017), 4 vom: 07. Jan., Seite 2001-2049 (DE-627)235946516 (DE-600)1401304-6 (DE-576)102432406 1382-3256 nnns volume:22 year:2017 number:4 day:07 month:01 pages:2001-2049 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9475-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 AR 22 2017 4 07 01 2001-2049 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10664-016-9475-z doi (DE-627)OLC2071664043 (DE-He213)s10664-016-9475-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 VZ Sakhnini, Victoria verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-6817-9081 aut Group versus individual use of power-only EPMcreate as a creativity enhancement technique for requirements elicitation 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017 Abstract Creativity is often needed in requirements elicitation, i.e., generating ideas for requirements, and therefore, techniques to enhance creativity are believed to be useful. How does the size of a group using the Power-Only EPMcreate (POEPMcreate) creativity enhancement technique affect the group’s and each member of the group’s effectiveness in generating requirement ideas? This paper describes an experiment in which individuals and two-person and four-person groups used POEPMcreate to generate ideas for requirements for enhancing a high school’s public Web site. The data of this experiment combined with the data of two previous experiments involving two-person and four-person groups using POEPMcreate show that, similar to what has been observed for brainstorming, the size of a group using POEPMcreate does affect the number of raw and new requirement ideas generated by the group and by the average member of the group. The data allow concluding that a two-person group using POEPMcreate generates more raw and new requirement ideas, both per group and per group member or individual, than does a four-person group and than does an individual. This conclusion is partially corroborated by qualitative data gathered from a survey of professional business or requirements analysts about group sizes and creativity enhancement techniques. Group Size Requirement Engineering Requirement Engineer Experiment Number Requirement Idea Mich, Luisa aut Berry, Daniel M. aut Enthalten in Empirical software engineering Springer US, 1996 22(2017), 4 vom: 07. Jan., Seite 2001-2049 (DE-627)235946516 (DE-600)1401304-6 (DE-576)102432406 1382-3256 nnns volume:22 year:2017 number:4 day:07 month:01 pages:2001-2049 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9475-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 AR 22 2017 4 07 01 2001-2049 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10664-016-9475-z doi (DE-627)OLC2071664043 (DE-He213)s10664-016-9475-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 VZ Sakhnini, Victoria verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-6817-9081 aut Group versus individual use of power-only EPMcreate as a creativity enhancement technique for requirements elicitation 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017 Abstract Creativity is often needed in requirements elicitation, i.e., generating ideas for requirements, and therefore, techniques to enhance creativity are believed to be useful. How does the size of a group using the Power-Only EPMcreate (POEPMcreate) creativity enhancement technique affect the group’s and each member of the group’s effectiveness in generating requirement ideas? This paper describes an experiment in which individuals and two-person and four-person groups used POEPMcreate to generate ideas for requirements for enhancing a high school’s public Web site. The data of this experiment combined with the data of two previous experiments involving two-person and four-person groups using POEPMcreate show that, similar to what has been observed for brainstorming, the size of a group using POEPMcreate does affect the number of raw and new requirement ideas generated by the group and by the average member of the group. The data allow concluding that a two-person group using POEPMcreate generates more raw and new requirement ideas, both per group and per group member or individual, than does a four-person group and than does an individual. This conclusion is partially corroborated by qualitative data gathered from a survey of professional business or requirements analysts about group sizes and creativity enhancement techniques. Group Size Requirement Engineering Requirement Engineer Experiment Number Requirement Idea Mich, Luisa aut Berry, Daniel M. aut Enthalten in Empirical software engineering Springer US, 1996 22(2017), 4 vom: 07. Jan., Seite 2001-2049 (DE-627)235946516 (DE-600)1401304-6 (DE-576)102432406 1382-3256 nnns volume:22 year:2017 number:4 day:07 month:01 pages:2001-2049 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9475-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 AR 22 2017 4 07 01 2001-2049 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10664-016-9475-z doi (DE-627)OLC2071664043 (DE-He213)s10664-016-9475-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 VZ Sakhnini, Victoria verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-6817-9081 aut Group versus individual use of power-only EPMcreate as a creativity enhancement technique for requirements elicitation 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017 Abstract Creativity is often needed in requirements elicitation, i.e., generating ideas for requirements, and therefore, techniques to enhance creativity are believed to be useful. How does the size of a group using the Power-Only EPMcreate (POEPMcreate) creativity enhancement technique affect the group’s and each member of the group’s effectiveness in generating requirement ideas? This paper describes an experiment in which individuals and two-person and four-person groups used POEPMcreate to generate ideas for requirements for enhancing a high school’s public Web site. The data of this experiment combined with the data of two previous experiments involving two-person and four-person groups using POEPMcreate show that, similar to what has been observed for brainstorming, the size of a group using POEPMcreate does affect the number of raw and new requirement ideas generated by the group and by the average member of the group. The data allow concluding that a two-person group using POEPMcreate generates more raw and new requirement ideas, both per group and per group member or individual, than does a four-person group and than does an individual. This conclusion is partially corroborated by qualitative data gathered from a survey of professional business or requirements analysts about group sizes and creativity enhancement techniques. Group Size Requirement Engineering Requirement Engineer Experiment Number Requirement Idea Mich, Luisa aut Berry, Daniel M. aut Enthalten in Empirical software engineering Springer US, 1996 22(2017), 4 vom: 07. Jan., Seite 2001-2049 (DE-627)235946516 (DE-600)1401304-6 (DE-576)102432406 1382-3256 nnns volume:22 year:2017 number:4 day:07 month:01 pages:2001-2049 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9475-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 AR 22 2017 4 07 01 2001-2049 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10664-016-9475-z doi (DE-627)OLC2071664043 (DE-He213)s10664-016-9475-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 VZ Sakhnini, Victoria verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-6817-9081 aut Group versus individual use of power-only EPMcreate as a creativity enhancement technique for requirements elicitation 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017 Abstract Creativity is often needed in requirements elicitation, i.e., generating ideas for requirements, and therefore, techniques to enhance creativity are believed to be useful. How does the size of a group using the Power-Only EPMcreate (POEPMcreate) creativity enhancement technique affect the group’s and each member of the group’s effectiveness in generating requirement ideas? This paper describes an experiment in which individuals and two-person and four-person groups used POEPMcreate to generate ideas for requirements for enhancing a high school’s public Web site. The data of this experiment combined with the data of two previous experiments involving two-person and four-person groups using POEPMcreate show that, similar to what has been observed for brainstorming, the size of a group using POEPMcreate does affect the number of raw and new requirement ideas generated by the group and by the average member of the group. The data allow concluding that a two-person group using POEPMcreate generates more raw and new requirement ideas, both per group and per group member or individual, than does a four-person group and than does an individual. This conclusion is partially corroborated by qualitative data gathered from a survey of professional business or requirements analysts about group sizes and creativity enhancement techniques. Group Size Requirement Engineering Requirement Engineer Experiment Number Requirement Idea Mich, Luisa aut Berry, Daniel M. aut Enthalten in Empirical software engineering Springer US, 1996 22(2017), 4 vom: 07. Jan., Seite 2001-2049 (DE-627)235946516 (DE-600)1401304-6 (DE-576)102432406 1382-3256 nnns volume:22 year:2017 number:4 day:07 month:01 pages:2001-2049 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9475-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 AR 22 2017 4 07 01 2001-2049 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Empirical software engineering 22(2017), 4 vom: 07. Jan., Seite 2001-2049 volume:22 year:2017 number:4 day:07 month:01 pages:2001-2049 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Empirical software engineering 22(2017), 4 vom: 07. Jan., Seite 2001-2049 volume:22 year:2017 number:4 day:07 month:01 pages:2001-2049 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Group Size Requirement Engineering Requirement Engineer Experiment Number Requirement Idea |
| dewey-raw |
004 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Empirical software engineering |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Sakhnini, Victoria @@aut@@ Mich, Luisa @@aut@@ Berry, Daniel M. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-07T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
235946516 |
| dewey-sort |
14 |
| id |
OLC2071664043 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2071664043</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503052531.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10664-016-9475-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2071664043</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10664-016-9475-z-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sakhnini, Victoria</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-6817-9081</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Group versus individual use of power-only EPMcreate as a creativity enhancement technique for requirements elicitation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Creativity is often needed in requirements elicitation, i.e., generating ideas for requirements, and therefore, techniques to enhance creativity are believed to be useful. How does the size of a group using the Power-Only EPMcreate (POEPMcreate) creativity enhancement technique affect the group’s and each member of the group’s effectiveness in generating requirement ideas? This paper describes an experiment in which individuals and two-person and four-person groups used POEPMcreate to generate ideas for requirements for enhancing a high school’s public Web site. The data of this experiment combined with the data of two previous experiments involving two-person and four-person groups using POEPMcreate show that, similar to what has been observed for brainstorming, the size of a group using POEPMcreate does affect the number of raw and new requirement ideas generated by the group and by the average member of the group. The data allow concluding that a two-person group using POEPMcreate generates more raw and new requirement ideas, both per group and per group member or individual, than does a four-person group and than does an individual. This conclusion is partially corroborated by qualitative data gathered from a survey of professional business or requirements analysts about group sizes and creativity enhancement techniques.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Group Size</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Requirement Engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Requirement Engineer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Experiment Number</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Requirement Idea</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mich, Luisa</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Berry, Daniel M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Empirical software engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">22(2017), 4 vom: 07. Jan., Seite 2001-2049</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)235946516</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1401304-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)102432406</subfield><subfield code="x">1382-3256</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:22</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:07</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2001-2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9475-z</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">22</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">07</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">2001-2049</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Sakhnini, Victoria |
| spellingShingle |
Sakhnini, Victoria ddc 004 misc Group Size misc Requirement Engineering misc Requirement Engineer misc Experiment Number misc Requirement Idea Group versus individual use of power-only EPMcreate as a creativity enhancement technique for requirements elicitation |
| authorStr |
Sakhnini, Victoria |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)235946516 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
004 - Data processing & computer science |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1382-3256 |
| topic_title |
004 VZ Group versus individual use of power-only EPMcreate as a creativity enhancement technique for requirements elicitation Group Size Requirement Engineering Requirement Engineer Experiment Number Requirement Idea |
| topic |
ddc 004 misc Group Size misc Requirement Engineering misc Requirement Engineer misc Experiment Number misc Requirement Idea |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 004 misc Group Size misc Requirement Engineering misc Requirement Engineer misc Experiment Number misc Requirement Idea |
| topic_browse |
ddc 004 misc Group Size misc Requirement Engineering misc Requirement Engineer misc Experiment Number misc Requirement Idea |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Empirical software engineering |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
235946516 |
| dewey-tens |
000 - Computer science, knowledge & systems |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Empirical software engineering |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)235946516 (DE-600)1401304-6 (DE-576)102432406 |
| title |
Group versus individual use of power-only EPMcreate as a creativity enhancement technique for requirements elicitation |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2071664043 (DE-He213)s10664-016-9475-z-p |
| title_full |
Group versus individual use of power-only EPMcreate as a creativity enhancement technique for requirements elicitation |
| author_sort |
Sakhnini, Victoria |
| journal |
Empirical software engineering |
| journalStr |
Empirical software engineering |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
000 - Computer science, information & general works |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
2001 |
| author_browse |
Sakhnini, Victoria Mich, Luisa Berry, Daniel M. |
| container_volume |
22 |
| class |
004 VZ |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Sakhnini, Victoria |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10664-016-9475-z |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0002-6817-9081 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0002-6817-9081 |
| dewey-full |
004 |
| title_sort |
group versus individual use of power-only epmcreate as a creativity enhancement technique for requirements elicitation |
| title_auth |
Group versus individual use of power-only EPMcreate as a creativity enhancement technique for requirements elicitation |
| abstract |
Abstract Creativity is often needed in requirements elicitation, i.e., generating ideas for requirements, and therefore, techniques to enhance creativity are believed to be useful. How does the size of a group using the Power-Only EPMcreate (POEPMcreate) creativity enhancement technique affect the group’s and each member of the group’s effectiveness in generating requirement ideas? This paper describes an experiment in which individuals and two-person and four-person groups used POEPMcreate to generate ideas for requirements for enhancing a high school’s public Web site. The data of this experiment combined with the data of two previous experiments involving two-person and four-person groups using POEPMcreate show that, similar to what has been observed for brainstorming, the size of a group using POEPMcreate does affect the number of raw and new requirement ideas generated by the group and by the average member of the group. The data allow concluding that a two-person group using POEPMcreate generates more raw and new requirement ideas, both per group and per group member or individual, than does a four-person group and than does an individual. This conclusion is partially corroborated by qualitative data gathered from a survey of professional business or requirements analysts about group sizes and creativity enhancement techniques. © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Creativity is often needed in requirements elicitation, i.e., generating ideas for requirements, and therefore, techniques to enhance creativity are believed to be useful. How does the size of a group using the Power-Only EPMcreate (POEPMcreate) creativity enhancement technique affect the group’s and each member of the group’s effectiveness in generating requirement ideas? This paper describes an experiment in which individuals and two-person and four-person groups used POEPMcreate to generate ideas for requirements for enhancing a high school’s public Web site. The data of this experiment combined with the data of two previous experiments involving two-person and four-person groups using POEPMcreate show that, similar to what has been observed for brainstorming, the size of a group using POEPMcreate does affect the number of raw and new requirement ideas generated by the group and by the average member of the group. The data allow concluding that a two-person group using POEPMcreate generates more raw and new requirement ideas, both per group and per group member or individual, than does a four-person group and than does an individual. This conclusion is partially corroborated by qualitative data gathered from a survey of professional business or requirements analysts about group sizes and creativity enhancement techniques. © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Creativity is often needed in requirements elicitation, i.e., generating ideas for requirements, and therefore, techniques to enhance creativity are believed to be useful. How does the size of a group using the Power-Only EPMcreate (POEPMcreate) creativity enhancement technique affect the group’s and each member of the group’s effectiveness in generating requirement ideas? This paper describes an experiment in which individuals and two-person and four-person groups used POEPMcreate to generate ideas for requirements for enhancing a high school’s public Web site. The data of this experiment combined with the data of two previous experiments involving two-person and four-person groups using POEPMcreate show that, similar to what has been observed for brainstorming, the size of a group using POEPMcreate does affect the number of raw and new requirement ideas generated by the group and by the average member of the group. The data allow concluding that a two-person group using POEPMcreate generates more raw and new requirement ideas, both per group and per group member or individual, than does a four-person group and than does an individual. This conclusion is partially corroborated by qualitative data gathered from a survey of professional business or requirements analysts about group sizes and creativity enhancement techniques. © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
Group versus individual use of power-only EPMcreate as a creativity enhancement technique for requirements elicitation |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9475-z |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Mich, Luisa Berry, Daniel M. |
| author2Str |
Mich, Luisa Berry, Daniel M. |
| ppnlink |
235946516 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10664-016-9475-z |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T03:57:07.807Z |
| _version_ |
1803619326036541440 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2071664043</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503052531.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10664-016-9475-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2071664043</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10664-016-9475-z-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sakhnini, Victoria</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-6817-9081</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Group versus individual use of power-only EPMcreate as a creativity enhancement technique for requirements elicitation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Creativity is often needed in requirements elicitation, i.e., generating ideas for requirements, and therefore, techniques to enhance creativity are believed to be useful. How does the size of a group using the Power-Only EPMcreate (POEPMcreate) creativity enhancement technique affect the group’s and each member of the group’s effectiveness in generating requirement ideas? This paper describes an experiment in which individuals and two-person and four-person groups used POEPMcreate to generate ideas for requirements for enhancing a high school’s public Web site. The data of this experiment combined with the data of two previous experiments involving two-person and four-person groups using POEPMcreate show that, similar to what has been observed for brainstorming, the size of a group using POEPMcreate does affect the number of raw and new requirement ideas generated by the group and by the average member of the group. The data allow concluding that a two-person group using POEPMcreate generates more raw and new requirement ideas, both per group and per group member or individual, than does a four-person group and than does an individual. This conclusion is partially corroborated by qualitative data gathered from a survey of professional business or requirements analysts about group sizes and creativity enhancement techniques.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Group Size</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Requirement Engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Requirement Engineer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Experiment Number</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Requirement Idea</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mich, Luisa</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Berry, Daniel M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Empirical software engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">22(2017), 4 vom: 07. Jan., Seite 2001-2049</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)235946516</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1401304-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)102432406</subfield><subfield code="x">1382-3256</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:22</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:07</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2001-2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9475-z</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">22</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">07</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">2001-2049</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399229 |