Basic and Refined Nomic Truth Approximation by Evidence-Guided Belief Revision in AGM-Terms
Abstract Straightforward theory revision, taking into account as effectively as possible the established nomic possibilities and, on their basis induced empirical laws, is conducive for (unstratified) nomic truth approximation. The question this paper asks is: is it possible to reconstruct the relev...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Kuipers, Theo A. F. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2011 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2011 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Erkenntnis - Springer Netherlands, 1930, 75(2011), 2 vom: 22. Juni, Seite 223-236 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:75 ; year:2011 ; number:2 ; day:22 ; month:06 ; pages:223-236 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10670-011-9292-0 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2072719577 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2072719577 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503053317.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s2011 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10670-011-9292-0 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2072719577 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10670-011-9292-0-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 100 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 100 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 5,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a PHILOS |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a LING |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kuipers, Theo A. F. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Basic and Refined Nomic Truth Approximation by Evidence-Guided Belief Revision in AGM-Terms |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2011 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s) 2011 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Straightforward theory revision, taking into account as effectively as possible the established nomic possibilities and, on their basis induced empirical laws, is conducive for (unstratified) nomic truth approximation. The question this paper asks is: is it possible to reconstruct the relevant theory revision steps, on the basis of incoming evidence, in AGM-terms? A positive answer will be given in two rounds, first for the case in which the initial theory is compatible with the established empirical laws, then for the case in which it is incompatible with at least one such a law. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Truth Approximation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Belief Revision | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Input Sentence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theory Revision | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Weak Claim | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Erkenntnis |d Springer Netherlands, 1930 |g 75(2011), 2 vom: 22. Juni, Seite 223-236 |w (DE-627)129476242 |w (DE-600)203461-X |w (DE-576)01485578X |x 0165-0106 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:75 |g year:2011 |g number:2 |g day:22 |g month:06 |g pages:223-236 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-011-9292-0 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a FID-PHILOS | ||
| 912 | |a FID-LING | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHI | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_21 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_72 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_130 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2018 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4027 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4028 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4082 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4193 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4317 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 75 |j 2011 |e 2 |b 22 |c 06 |h 223-236 | ||
| author_variant |
t a f k taf tafk |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:01650106:2011----::aiadeienmcrtapoiainyvdneudde |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2011 |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10670-011-9292-0 doi (DE-627)OLC2072719577 (DE-He213)s10670-011-9292-0-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 VZ 100 VZ 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid LING DE-30 fid Kuipers, Theo A. F. verfasserin aut Basic and Refined Nomic Truth Approximation by Evidence-Guided Belief Revision in AGM-Terms 2011 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2011 Abstract Straightforward theory revision, taking into account as effectively as possible the established nomic possibilities and, on their basis induced empirical laws, is conducive for (unstratified) nomic truth approximation. The question this paper asks is: is it possible to reconstruct the relevant theory revision steps, on the basis of incoming evidence, in AGM-terms? A positive answer will be given in two rounds, first for the case in which the initial theory is compatible with the established empirical laws, then for the case in which it is incompatible with at least one such a law. Truth Approximation Belief Revision Input Sentence Theory Revision Weak Claim Enthalten in Erkenntnis Springer Netherlands, 1930 75(2011), 2 vom: 22. Juni, Seite 223-236 (DE-627)129476242 (DE-600)203461-X (DE-576)01485578X 0165-0106 nnns volume:75 year:2011 number:2 day:22 month:06 pages:223-236 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-011-9292-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 75 2011 2 22 06 223-236 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10670-011-9292-0 doi (DE-627)OLC2072719577 (DE-He213)s10670-011-9292-0-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 VZ 100 VZ 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid LING DE-30 fid Kuipers, Theo A. F. verfasserin aut Basic and Refined Nomic Truth Approximation by Evidence-Guided Belief Revision in AGM-Terms 2011 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2011 Abstract Straightforward theory revision, taking into account as effectively as possible the established nomic possibilities and, on their basis induced empirical laws, is conducive for (unstratified) nomic truth approximation. The question this paper asks is: is it possible to reconstruct the relevant theory revision steps, on the basis of incoming evidence, in AGM-terms? A positive answer will be given in two rounds, first for the case in which the initial theory is compatible with the established empirical laws, then for the case in which it is incompatible with at least one such a law. Truth Approximation Belief Revision Input Sentence Theory Revision Weak Claim Enthalten in Erkenntnis Springer Netherlands, 1930 75(2011), 2 vom: 22. Juni, Seite 223-236 (DE-627)129476242 (DE-600)203461-X (DE-576)01485578X 0165-0106 nnns volume:75 year:2011 number:2 day:22 month:06 pages:223-236 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-011-9292-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 75 2011 2 22 06 223-236 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10670-011-9292-0 doi (DE-627)OLC2072719577 (DE-He213)s10670-011-9292-0-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 VZ 100 VZ 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid LING DE-30 fid Kuipers, Theo A. F. verfasserin aut Basic and Refined Nomic Truth Approximation by Evidence-Guided Belief Revision in AGM-Terms 2011 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2011 Abstract Straightforward theory revision, taking into account as effectively as possible the established nomic possibilities and, on their basis induced empirical laws, is conducive for (unstratified) nomic truth approximation. The question this paper asks is: is it possible to reconstruct the relevant theory revision steps, on the basis of incoming evidence, in AGM-terms? A positive answer will be given in two rounds, first for the case in which the initial theory is compatible with the established empirical laws, then for the case in which it is incompatible with at least one such a law. Truth Approximation Belief Revision Input Sentence Theory Revision Weak Claim Enthalten in Erkenntnis Springer Netherlands, 1930 75(2011), 2 vom: 22. Juni, Seite 223-236 (DE-627)129476242 (DE-600)203461-X (DE-576)01485578X 0165-0106 nnns volume:75 year:2011 number:2 day:22 month:06 pages:223-236 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-011-9292-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 75 2011 2 22 06 223-236 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10670-011-9292-0 doi (DE-627)OLC2072719577 (DE-He213)s10670-011-9292-0-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 VZ 100 VZ 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid LING DE-30 fid Kuipers, Theo A. F. verfasserin aut Basic and Refined Nomic Truth Approximation by Evidence-Guided Belief Revision in AGM-Terms 2011 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2011 Abstract Straightforward theory revision, taking into account as effectively as possible the established nomic possibilities and, on their basis induced empirical laws, is conducive for (unstratified) nomic truth approximation. The question this paper asks is: is it possible to reconstruct the relevant theory revision steps, on the basis of incoming evidence, in AGM-terms? A positive answer will be given in two rounds, first for the case in which the initial theory is compatible with the established empirical laws, then for the case in which it is incompatible with at least one such a law. Truth Approximation Belief Revision Input Sentence Theory Revision Weak Claim Enthalten in Erkenntnis Springer Netherlands, 1930 75(2011), 2 vom: 22. Juni, Seite 223-236 (DE-627)129476242 (DE-600)203461-X (DE-576)01485578X 0165-0106 nnns volume:75 year:2011 number:2 day:22 month:06 pages:223-236 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-011-9292-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 75 2011 2 22 06 223-236 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10670-011-9292-0 doi (DE-627)OLC2072719577 (DE-He213)s10670-011-9292-0-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 VZ 100 VZ 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid LING DE-30 fid Kuipers, Theo A. F. verfasserin aut Basic and Refined Nomic Truth Approximation by Evidence-Guided Belief Revision in AGM-Terms 2011 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2011 Abstract Straightforward theory revision, taking into account as effectively as possible the established nomic possibilities and, on their basis induced empirical laws, is conducive for (unstratified) nomic truth approximation. The question this paper asks is: is it possible to reconstruct the relevant theory revision steps, on the basis of incoming evidence, in AGM-terms? A positive answer will be given in two rounds, first for the case in which the initial theory is compatible with the established empirical laws, then for the case in which it is incompatible with at least one such a law. Truth Approximation Belief Revision Input Sentence Theory Revision Weak Claim Enthalten in Erkenntnis Springer Netherlands, 1930 75(2011), 2 vom: 22. Juni, Seite 223-236 (DE-627)129476242 (DE-600)203461-X (DE-576)01485578X 0165-0106 nnns volume:75 year:2011 number:2 day:22 month:06 pages:223-236 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-011-9292-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 75 2011 2 22 06 223-236 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Erkenntnis 75(2011), 2 vom: 22. Juni, Seite 223-236 volume:75 year:2011 number:2 day:22 month:06 pages:223-236 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Erkenntnis 75(2011), 2 vom: 22. Juni, Seite 223-236 volume:75 year:2011 number:2 day:22 month:06 pages:223-236 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Truth Approximation Belief Revision Input Sentence Theory Revision Weak Claim |
| dewey-raw |
100 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Erkenntnis |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Kuipers, Theo A. F. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2011-06-22T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
129476242 |
| dewey-sort |
3100 |
| id |
OLC2072719577 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2072719577</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503053317.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2011 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10670-011-9292-0</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2072719577</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10670-011-9292-0-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHILOS</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kuipers, Theo A. F.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Basic and Refined Nomic Truth Approximation by Evidence-Guided Belief Revision in AGM-Terms</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Straightforward theory revision, taking into account as effectively as possible the established nomic possibilities and, on their basis induced empirical laws, is conducive for (unstratified) nomic truth approximation. The question this paper asks is: is it possible to reconstruct the relevant theory revision steps, on the basis of incoming evidence, in AGM-terms? A positive answer will be given in two rounds, first for the case in which the initial theory is compatible with the established empirical laws, then for the case in which it is incompatible with at least one such a law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Truth Approximation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Belief Revision</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Input Sentence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Theory Revision</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Weak Claim</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Erkenntnis</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1930</subfield><subfield code="g">75(2011), 2 vom: 22. Juni, Seite 223-236</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129476242</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)203461-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)01485578X</subfield><subfield code="x">0165-0106</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:75</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:22</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:223-236</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-011-9292-0</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHILOS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_72</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4317</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">75</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">22</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">223-236</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Kuipers, Theo A. F. |
| spellingShingle |
Kuipers, Theo A. F. ddc 100 ssgn 5,1 fid PHILOS fid LING misc Truth Approximation misc Belief Revision misc Input Sentence misc Theory Revision misc Weak Claim Basic and Refined Nomic Truth Approximation by Evidence-Guided Belief Revision in AGM-Terms |
| authorStr |
Kuipers, Theo A. F. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129476242 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0165-0106 |
| topic_title |
100 VZ 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid LING DE-30 fid Basic and Refined Nomic Truth Approximation by Evidence-Guided Belief Revision in AGM-Terms Truth Approximation Belief Revision Input Sentence Theory Revision Weak Claim |
| topic |
ddc 100 ssgn 5,1 fid PHILOS fid LING misc Truth Approximation misc Belief Revision misc Input Sentence misc Theory Revision misc Weak Claim |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 100 ssgn 5,1 fid PHILOS fid LING misc Truth Approximation misc Belief Revision misc Input Sentence misc Theory Revision misc Weak Claim |
| topic_browse |
ddc 100 ssgn 5,1 fid PHILOS fid LING misc Truth Approximation misc Belief Revision misc Input Sentence misc Theory Revision misc Weak Claim |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Erkenntnis |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
129476242 |
| dewey-tens |
100 - Philosophy |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Erkenntnis |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129476242 (DE-600)203461-X (DE-576)01485578X |
| title |
Basic and Refined Nomic Truth Approximation by Evidence-Guided Belief Revision in AGM-Terms |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2072719577 (DE-He213)s10670-011-9292-0-p |
| title_full |
Basic and Refined Nomic Truth Approximation by Evidence-Guided Belief Revision in AGM-Terms |
| author_sort |
Kuipers, Theo A. F. |
| journal |
Erkenntnis |
| journalStr |
Erkenntnis |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2011 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
223 |
| author_browse |
Kuipers, Theo A. F. |
| container_volume |
75 |
| class |
100 VZ 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid LING DE-30 fid |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Kuipers, Theo A. F. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10670-011-9292-0 |
| dewey-full |
100 |
| title_sort |
basic and refined nomic truth approximation by evidence-guided belief revision in agm-terms |
| title_auth |
Basic and Refined Nomic Truth Approximation by Evidence-Guided Belief Revision in AGM-Terms |
| abstract |
Abstract Straightforward theory revision, taking into account as effectively as possible the established nomic possibilities and, on their basis induced empirical laws, is conducive for (unstratified) nomic truth approximation. The question this paper asks is: is it possible to reconstruct the relevant theory revision steps, on the basis of incoming evidence, in AGM-terms? A positive answer will be given in two rounds, first for the case in which the initial theory is compatible with the established empirical laws, then for the case in which it is incompatible with at least one such a law. © The Author(s) 2011 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Straightforward theory revision, taking into account as effectively as possible the established nomic possibilities and, on their basis induced empirical laws, is conducive for (unstratified) nomic truth approximation. The question this paper asks is: is it possible to reconstruct the relevant theory revision steps, on the basis of incoming evidence, in AGM-terms? A positive answer will be given in two rounds, first for the case in which the initial theory is compatible with the established empirical laws, then for the case in which it is incompatible with at least one such a law. © The Author(s) 2011 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Straightforward theory revision, taking into account as effectively as possible the established nomic possibilities and, on their basis induced empirical laws, is conducive for (unstratified) nomic truth approximation. The question this paper asks is: is it possible to reconstruct the relevant theory revision steps, on the basis of incoming evidence, in AGM-terms? A positive answer will be given in two rounds, first for the case in which the initial theory is compatible with the established empirical laws, then for the case in which it is incompatible with at least one such a law. © The Author(s) 2011 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4700 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Basic and Refined Nomic Truth Approximation by Evidence-Guided Belief Revision in AGM-Terms |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-011-9292-0 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
129476242 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10670-011-9292-0 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T15:57:21.018Z |
| _version_ |
1803574041399787520 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2072719577</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503053317.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2011 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10670-011-9292-0</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2072719577</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10670-011-9292-0-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHILOS</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kuipers, Theo A. F.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Basic and Refined Nomic Truth Approximation by Evidence-Guided Belief Revision in AGM-Terms</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Straightforward theory revision, taking into account as effectively as possible the established nomic possibilities and, on their basis induced empirical laws, is conducive for (unstratified) nomic truth approximation. The question this paper asks is: is it possible to reconstruct the relevant theory revision steps, on the basis of incoming evidence, in AGM-terms? A positive answer will be given in two rounds, first for the case in which the initial theory is compatible with the established empirical laws, then for the case in which it is incompatible with at least one such a law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Truth Approximation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Belief Revision</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Input Sentence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Theory Revision</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Weak Claim</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Erkenntnis</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1930</subfield><subfield code="g">75(2011), 2 vom: 22. Juni, Seite 223-236</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129476242</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)203461-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)01485578X</subfield><subfield code="x">0165-0106</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:75</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:22</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:223-236</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-011-9292-0</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHILOS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_72</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4317</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">75</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">22</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">223-236</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4007626 |