Daily Behavior Report Cards and Systematic Direct Observation: An Investigation of the Acceptability, Reported Training and Use, and Decision Reliability Among School Psychologists
Abstract More than ever, educators require assessment procedures and instrumentation that are technically adequate as well as efficient to guide data-based decision making. Thus, there is a need to understand perceptions of available tools, and the decisions made when using collected data, by the pr...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Riley-Tillman, T. Chris [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2008 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of behavioral education - Springer US, 1991, 17(2008), 4 vom: 02. Juli, Seite 313-327 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:17 ; year:2008 ; number:4 ; day:02 ; month:07 ; pages:313-327 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10864-008-9070-5 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC2073046398 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2073046398 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230503133502.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 200819s2008 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10864-008-9070-5 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2073046398 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s10864-008-9070-5-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 370 |a 150 |q VZ |
084 | |a 5,3 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Riley-Tillman, T. Chris |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Daily Behavior Report Cards and Systematic Direct Observation: An Investigation of the Acceptability, Reported Training and Use, and Decision Reliability Among School Psychologists |
264 | 1 | |c 2008 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 | ||
520 | |a Abstract More than ever, educators require assessment procedures and instrumentation that are technically adequate as well as efficient to guide data-based decision making. Thus, there is a need to understand perceptions of available tools, and the decisions made when using collected data, by the primary users of those data. In this paper, two studies that surveyed members of the National Association of School Psychologists with regard to two procedures useful in formative assessment, (i.e., Daily Behavior Report Cards; Systematic Direct Observation), are presented. Participants reported greater overall levels of training and use of Systematic Direct Observation than Daily Behavior Report Cards, yet both techniques were rated as equally acceptable for use in formative assessment. Furthermore, findings supported that school psychologists tend to make similar intervention decisions when presented with both types of data. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Daily behavior report cards | |
650 | 4 | |a Direct behavior ratings | |
650 | 4 | |a Systematic direct observation | |
650 | 4 | |a Social behavior assessment | |
700 | 1 | |a Chafouleas, Sandra M. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Briesch, Amy M. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Eckert, Tanya L. |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of behavioral education |d Springer US, 1991 |g 17(2008), 4 vom: 02. Juli, Seite 313-327 |w (DE-627)171341007 |w (DE-600)1179314-4 |w (DE-576)9171341005 |x 1053-0819 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:17 |g year:2008 |g number:4 |g day:02 |g month:07 |g pages:313-327 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-008-9070-5 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-BIF | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 17 |j 2008 |e 4 |b 02 |c 07 |h 313-327 |
author_variant |
t c r t tcr tcrt s m c sm smc a m b am amb t l e tl tle |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:10530819:2008----::albhvorprcrsnsseaidrcosrainnnetgtootecetbltrpretannadsade |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2008 |
publishDate |
2008 |
allfields |
10.1007/s10864-008-9070-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2073046398 (DE-He213)s10864-008-9070-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 370 150 VZ 5,3 ssgn Riley-Tillman, T. Chris verfasserin aut Daily Behavior Report Cards and Systematic Direct Observation: An Investigation of the Acceptability, Reported Training and Use, and Decision Reliability Among School Psychologists 2008 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 Abstract More than ever, educators require assessment procedures and instrumentation that are technically adequate as well as efficient to guide data-based decision making. Thus, there is a need to understand perceptions of available tools, and the decisions made when using collected data, by the primary users of those data. In this paper, two studies that surveyed members of the National Association of School Psychologists with regard to two procedures useful in formative assessment, (i.e., Daily Behavior Report Cards; Systematic Direct Observation), are presented. Participants reported greater overall levels of training and use of Systematic Direct Observation than Daily Behavior Report Cards, yet both techniques were rated as equally acceptable for use in formative assessment. Furthermore, findings supported that school psychologists tend to make similar intervention decisions when presented with both types of data. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed. Daily behavior report cards Direct behavior ratings Systematic direct observation Social behavior assessment Chafouleas, Sandra M. aut Briesch, Amy M. aut Eckert, Tanya L. aut Enthalten in Journal of behavioral education Springer US, 1991 17(2008), 4 vom: 02. Juli, Seite 313-327 (DE-627)171341007 (DE-600)1179314-4 (DE-576)9171341005 1053-0819 nnns volume:17 year:2008 number:4 day:02 month:07 pages:313-327 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-008-9070-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BIF GBV_ILN_4112 AR 17 2008 4 02 07 313-327 |
spelling |
10.1007/s10864-008-9070-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2073046398 (DE-He213)s10864-008-9070-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 370 150 VZ 5,3 ssgn Riley-Tillman, T. Chris verfasserin aut Daily Behavior Report Cards and Systematic Direct Observation: An Investigation of the Acceptability, Reported Training and Use, and Decision Reliability Among School Psychologists 2008 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 Abstract More than ever, educators require assessment procedures and instrumentation that are technically adequate as well as efficient to guide data-based decision making. Thus, there is a need to understand perceptions of available tools, and the decisions made when using collected data, by the primary users of those data. In this paper, two studies that surveyed members of the National Association of School Psychologists with regard to two procedures useful in formative assessment, (i.e., Daily Behavior Report Cards; Systematic Direct Observation), are presented. Participants reported greater overall levels of training and use of Systematic Direct Observation than Daily Behavior Report Cards, yet both techniques were rated as equally acceptable for use in formative assessment. Furthermore, findings supported that school psychologists tend to make similar intervention decisions when presented with both types of data. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed. Daily behavior report cards Direct behavior ratings Systematic direct observation Social behavior assessment Chafouleas, Sandra M. aut Briesch, Amy M. aut Eckert, Tanya L. aut Enthalten in Journal of behavioral education Springer US, 1991 17(2008), 4 vom: 02. Juli, Seite 313-327 (DE-627)171341007 (DE-600)1179314-4 (DE-576)9171341005 1053-0819 nnns volume:17 year:2008 number:4 day:02 month:07 pages:313-327 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-008-9070-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BIF GBV_ILN_4112 AR 17 2008 4 02 07 313-327 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10864-008-9070-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2073046398 (DE-He213)s10864-008-9070-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 370 150 VZ 5,3 ssgn Riley-Tillman, T. Chris verfasserin aut Daily Behavior Report Cards and Systematic Direct Observation: An Investigation of the Acceptability, Reported Training and Use, and Decision Reliability Among School Psychologists 2008 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 Abstract More than ever, educators require assessment procedures and instrumentation that are technically adequate as well as efficient to guide data-based decision making. Thus, there is a need to understand perceptions of available tools, and the decisions made when using collected data, by the primary users of those data. In this paper, two studies that surveyed members of the National Association of School Psychologists with regard to two procedures useful in formative assessment, (i.e., Daily Behavior Report Cards; Systematic Direct Observation), are presented. Participants reported greater overall levels of training and use of Systematic Direct Observation than Daily Behavior Report Cards, yet both techniques were rated as equally acceptable for use in formative assessment. Furthermore, findings supported that school psychologists tend to make similar intervention decisions when presented with both types of data. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed. Daily behavior report cards Direct behavior ratings Systematic direct observation Social behavior assessment Chafouleas, Sandra M. aut Briesch, Amy M. aut Eckert, Tanya L. aut Enthalten in Journal of behavioral education Springer US, 1991 17(2008), 4 vom: 02. Juli, Seite 313-327 (DE-627)171341007 (DE-600)1179314-4 (DE-576)9171341005 1053-0819 nnns volume:17 year:2008 number:4 day:02 month:07 pages:313-327 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-008-9070-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BIF GBV_ILN_4112 AR 17 2008 4 02 07 313-327 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10864-008-9070-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2073046398 (DE-He213)s10864-008-9070-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 370 150 VZ 5,3 ssgn Riley-Tillman, T. Chris verfasserin aut Daily Behavior Report Cards and Systematic Direct Observation: An Investigation of the Acceptability, Reported Training and Use, and Decision Reliability Among School Psychologists 2008 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 Abstract More than ever, educators require assessment procedures and instrumentation that are technically adequate as well as efficient to guide data-based decision making. Thus, there is a need to understand perceptions of available tools, and the decisions made when using collected data, by the primary users of those data. In this paper, two studies that surveyed members of the National Association of School Psychologists with regard to two procedures useful in formative assessment, (i.e., Daily Behavior Report Cards; Systematic Direct Observation), are presented. Participants reported greater overall levels of training and use of Systematic Direct Observation than Daily Behavior Report Cards, yet both techniques were rated as equally acceptable for use in formative assessment. Furthermore, findings supported that school psychologists tend to make similar intervention decisions when presented with both types of data. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed. Daily behavior report cards Direct behavior ratings Systematic direct observation Social behavior assessment Chafouleas, Sandra M. aut Briesch, Amy M. aut Eckert, Tanya L. aut Enthalten in Journal of behavioral education Springer US, 1991 17(2008), 4 vom: 02. Juli, Seite 313-327 (DE-627)171341007 (DE-600)1179314-4 (DE-576)9171341005 1053-0819 nnns volume:17 year:2008 number:4 day:02 month:07 pages:313-327 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-008-9070-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BIF GBV_ILN_4112 AR 17 2008 4 02 07 313-327 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10864-008-9070-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2073046398 (DE-He213)s10864-008-9070-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 370 150 VZ 5,3 ssgn Riley-Tillman, T. Chris verfasserin aut Daily Behavior Report Cards and Systematic Direct Observation: An Investigation of the Acceptability, Reported Training and Use, and Decision Reliability Among School Psychologists 2008 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 Abstract More than ever, educators require assessment procedures and instrumentation that are technically adequate as well as efficient to guide data-based decision making. Thus, there is a need to understand perceptions of available tools, and the decisions made when using collected data, by the primary users of those data. In this paper, two studies that surveyed members of the National Association of School Psychologists with regard to two procedures useful in formative assessment, (i.e., Daily Behavior Report Cards; Systematic Direct Observation), are presented. Participants reported greater overall levels of training and use of Systematic Direct Observation than Daily Behavior Report Cards, yet both techniques were rated as equally acceptable for use in formative assessment. Furthermore, findings supported that school psychologists tend to make similar intervention decisions when presented with both types of data. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed. Daily behavior report cards Direct behavior ratings Systematic direct observation Social behavior assessment Chafouleas, Sandra M. aut Briesch, Amy M. aut Eckert, Tanya L. aut Enthalten in Journal of behavioral education Springer US, 1991 17(2008), 4 vom: 02. Juli, Seite 313-327 (DE-627)171341007 (DE-600)1179314-4 (DE-576)9171341005 1053-0819 nnns volume:17 year:2008 number:4 day:02 month:07 pages:313-327 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-008-9070-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BIF GBV_ILN_4112 AR 17 2008 4 02 07 313-327 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Journal of behavioral education 17(2008), 4 vom: 02. Juli, Seite 313-327 volume:17 year:2008 number:4 day:02 month:07 pages:313-327 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of behavioral education 17(2008), 4 vom: 02. Juli, Seite 313-327 volume:17 year:2008 number:4 day:02 month:07 pages:313-327 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Daily behavior report cards Direct behavior ratings Systematic direct observation Social behavior assessment |
dewey-raw |
370 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Journal of behavioral education |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Riley-Tillman, T. Chris @@aut@@ Chafouleas, Sandra M. @@aut@@ Briesch, Amy M. @@aut@@ Eckert, Tanya L. @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2008-07-02T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
171341007 |
dewey-sort |
3370 |
id |
OLC2073046398 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2073046398</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503133502.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2008 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10864-008-9070-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2073046398</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10864-008-9070-5-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,3</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Riley-Tillman, T. Chris</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Daily Behavior Report Cards and Systematic Direct Observation: An Investigation of the Acceptability, Reported Training and Use, and Decision Reliability Among School Psychologists</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract More than ever, educators require assessment procedures and instrumentation that are technically adequate as well as efficient to guide data-based decision making. Thus, there is a need to understand perceptions of available tools, and the decisions made when using collected data, by the primary users of those data. In this paper, two studies that surveyed members of the National Association of School Psychologists with regard to two procedures useful in formative assessment, (i.e., Daily Behavior Report Cards; Systematic Direct Observation), are presented. Participants reported greater overall levels of training and use of Systematic Direct Observation than Daily Behavior Report Cards, yet both techniques were rated as equally acceptable for use in formative assessment. Furthermore, findings supported that school psychologists tend to make similar intervention decisions when presented with both types of data. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Daily behavior report cards</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Direct behavior ratings</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Systematic direct observation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social behavior assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chafouleas, Sandra M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Briesch, Amy M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eckert, Tanya L.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of behavioral education</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1991</subfield><subfield code="g">17(2008), 4 vom: 02. Juli, Seite 313-327</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)171341007</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1179314-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)9171341005</subfield><subfield code="x">1053-0819</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:17</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2008</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:313-327</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-008-9070-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-BIF</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">17</subfield><subfield code="j">2008</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield><subfield code="h">313-327</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Riley-Tillman, T. Chris |
spellingShingle |
Riley-Tillman, T. Chris ddc 370 ssgn 5,3 misc Daily behavior report cards misc Direct behavior ratings misc Systematic direct observation misc Social behavior assessment Daily Behavior Report Cards and Systematic Direct Observation: An Investigation of the Acceptability, Reported Training and Use, and Decision Reliability Among School Psychologists |
authorStr |
Riley-Tillman, T. Chris |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)171341007 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
370 - Education 150 - Psychology |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1053-0819 |
topic_title |
370 150 VZ 5,3 ssgn Daily Behavior Report Cards and Systematic Direct Observation: An Investigation of the Acceptability, Reported Training and Use, and Decision Reliability Among School Psychologists Daily behavior report cards Direct behavior ratings Systematic direct observation Social behavior assessment |
topic |
ddc 370 ssgn 5,3 misc Daily behavior report cards misc Direct behavior ratings misc Systematic direct observation misc Social behavior assessment |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 370 ssgn 5,3 misc Daily behavior report cards misc Direct behavior ratings misc Systematic direct observation misc Social behavior assessment |
topic_browse |
ddc 370 ssgn 5,3 misc Daily behavior report cards misc Direct behavior ratings misc Systematic direct observation misc Social behavior assessment |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of behavioral education |
hierarchy_parent_id |
171341007 |
dewey-tens |
370 - Education 150 - Psychology |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of behavioral education |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)171341007 (DE-600)1179314-4 (DE-576)9171341005 |
title |
Daily Behavior Report Cards and Systematic Direct Observation: An Investigation of the Acceptability, Reported Training and Use, and Decision Reliability Among School Psychologists |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2073046398 (DE-He213)s10864-008-9070-5-p |
title_full |
Daily Behavior Report Cards and Systematic Direct Observation: An Investigation of the Acceptability, Reported Training and Use, and Decision Reliability Among School Psychologists |
author_sort |
Riley-Tillman, T. Chris |
journal |
Journal of behavioral education |
journalStr |
Journal of behavioral education |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2008 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
313 |
author_browse |
Riley-Tillman, T. Chris Chafouleas, Sandra M. Briesch, Amy M. Eckert, Tanya L. |
container_volume |
17 |
class |
370 150 VZ 5,3 ssgn |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Riley-Tillman, T. Chris |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10864-008-9070-5 |
dewey-full |
370 150 |
title_sort |
daily behavior report cards and systematic direct observation: an investigation of the acceptability, reported training and use, and decision reliability among school psychologists |
title_auth |
Daily Behavior Report Cards and Systematic Direct Observation: An Investigation of the Acceptability, Reported Training and Use, and Decision Reliability Among School Psychologists |
abstract |
Abstract More than ever, educators require assessment procedures and instrumentation that are technically adequate as well as efficient to guide data-based decision making. Thus, there is a need to understand perceptions of available tools, and the decisions made when using collected data, by the primary users of those data. In this paper, two studies that surveyed members of the National Association of School Psychologists with regard to two procedures useful in formative assessment, (i.e., Daily Behavior Report Cards; Systematic Direct Observation), are presented. Participants reported greater overall levels of training and use of Systematic Direct Observation than Daily Behavior Report Cards, yet both techniques were rated as equally acceptable for use in formative assessment. Furthermore, findings supported that school psychologists tend to make similar intervention decisions when presented with both types of data. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 |
abstractGer |
Abstract More than ever, educators require assessment procedures and instrumentation that are technically adequate as well as efficient to guide data-based decision making. Thus, there is a need to understand perceptions of available tools, and the decisions made when using collected data, by the primary users of those data. In this paper, two studies that surveyed members of the National Association of School Psychologists with regard to two procedures useful in formative assessment, (i.e., Daily Behavior Report Cards; Systematic Direct Observation), are presented. Participants reported greater overall levels of training and use of Systematic Direct Observation than Daily Behavior Report Cards, yet both techniques were rated as equally acceptable for use in formative assessment. Furthermore, findings supported that school psychologists tend to make similar intervention decisions when presented with both types of data. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract More than ever, educators require assessment procedures and instrumentation that are technically adequate as well as efficient to guide data-based decision making. Thus, there is a need to understand perceptions of available tools, and the decisions made when using collected data, by the primary users of those data. In this paper, two studies that surveyed members of the National Association of School Psychologists with regard to two procedures useful in formative assessment, (i.e., Daily Behavior Report Cards; Systematic Direct Observation), are presented. Participants reported greater overall levels of training and use of Systematic Direct Observation than Daily Behavior Report Cards, yet both techniques were rated as equally acceptable for use in formative assessment. Furthermore, findings supported that school psychologists tend to make similar intervention decisions when presented with both types of data. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BIF GBV_ILN_4112 |
container_issue |
4 |
title_short |
Daily Behavior Report Cards and Systematic Direct Observation: An Investigation of the Acceptability, Reported Training and Use, and Decision Reliability Among School Psychologists |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-008-9070-5 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Chafouleas, Sandra M. Briesch, Amy M. Eckert, Tanya L. |
author2Str |
Chafouleas, Sandra M. Briesch, Amy M. Eckert, Tanya L. |
ppnlink |
171341007 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s10864-008-9070-5 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T17:04:15.078Z |
_version_ |
1803578250445717504 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2073046398</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503133502.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2008 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10864-008-9070-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2073046398</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10864-008-9070-5-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,3</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Riley-Tillman, T. Chris</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Daily Behavior Report Cards and Systematic Direct Observation: An Investigation of the Acceptability, Reported Training and Use, and Decision Reliability Among School Psychologists</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract More than ever, educators require assessment procedures and instrumentation that are technically adequate as well as efficient to guide data-based decision making. Thus, there is a need to understand perceptions of available tools, and the decisions made when using collected data, by the primary users of those data. In this paper, two studies that surveyed members of the National Association of School Psychologists with regard to two procedures useful in formative assessment, (i.e., Daily Behavior Report Cards; Systematic Direct Observation), are presented. Participants reported greater overall levels of training and use of Systematic Direct Observation than Daily Behavior Report Cards, yet both techniques were rated as equally acceptable for use in formative assessment. Furthermore, findings supported that school psychologists tend to make similar intervention decisions when presented with both types of data. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Daily behavior report cards</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Direct behavior ratings</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Systematic direct observation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social behavior assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chafouleas, Sandra M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Briesch, Amy M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eckert, Tanya L.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of behavioral education</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1991</subfield><subfield code="g">17(2008), 4 vom: 02. Juli, Seite 313-327</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)171341007</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1179314-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)9171341005</subfield><subfield code="x">1053-0819</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:17</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2008</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:313-327</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-008-9070-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-BIF</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">17</subfield><subfield code="j">2008</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield><subfield code="h">313-327</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.400014 |