Assessment of the efficiency and economic viability of various methods of treatment of sanitary landfill leachate
Abstract This study assesses the efficiency of various physico-chemical, biological and other tertiary methods for treating leachate. An evaluation study on the treatability of the leachate from methane phase bed (MPB) reactor indicated that at an optimum hydraulic retention time of 6 days, the effi...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Gupta, S. K. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2007 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Environmental monitoring and assessment - Springer Netherlands, 1981, 135(2007), 1-3 vom: 16. Mai, Seite 107-117 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:135 ; year:2007 ; number:1-3 ; day:16 ; month:05 ; pages:107-117 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10661-007-9714-2 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2073726887 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2073726887 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503051753.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s2007 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10661-007-9714-2 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2073726887 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10661-007-9714-2-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 333.7 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Gupta, S. K. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Assessment of the efficiency and economic viability of various methods of treatment of sanitary landfill leachate |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2007 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract This study assesses the efficiency of various physico-chemical, biological and other tertiary methods for treating leachate. An evaluation study on the treatability of the leachate from methane phase bed (MPB) reactor indicated that at an optimum hydraulic retention time of 6 days, the efficiency of the reactor in terms of biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal was 91.29 and 82.69%, respectively. Recycling of the treated leachate through the municipal solid waste layers in the leachate recycling unit (LRU) resulted in a significant increase in the biodegradation of organics present in the leachate. Optimum BOD and COD removal efficiencies were achieved at the third recycle; additional recycling of the leachate did not produce any significant improvement. Physico-chemical treatment of the leachate demonstrated that alum and lime (Option 2) were more economical than coagulants lime and $ MgCO_{3} $. A cost analysis of the economics of the various treatments revealed that the alternative treatment consisting of a MPB bed followed by a LRU and aerated lagoon is the most cost-effective treatment. However, the alternative consisting of a MPB followed by the LRU and a soil column, which is slightly more costly, would be the most appropriate treatment when adequate land is readily available. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Cost optimization | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Leachate | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Leachate treatment plants | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Methane phase bed | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Municipal solid waste | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Recirculation | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Singh, Gurdeep |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Environmental monitoring and assessment |d Springer Netherlands, 1981 |g 135(2007), 1-3 vom: 16. Mai, Seite 107-117 |w (DE-627)130549649 |w (DE-600)782621-7 |w (DE-576)476125413 |x 0167-6369 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:135 |g year:2007 |g number:1-3 |g day:16 |g month:05 |g pages:107-117 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9714-2 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-UMW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-FOR | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-IBL | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4219 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 135 |j 2007 |e 1-3 |b 16 |c 05 |h 107-117 | ||
| author_variant |
s k g sk skg g s gs |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:01676369:2007----::sesetfhefcecadcnmcibltovrosehdotetet |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2007 |
| publishDate |
2007 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10661-007-9714-2 doi (DE-627)OLC2073726887 (DE-He213)s10661-007-9714-2-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 VZ Gupta, S. K. verfasserin aut Assessment of the efficiency and economic viability of various methods of treatment of sanitary landfill leachate 2007 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract This study assesses the efficiency of various physico-chemical, biological and other tertiary methods for treating leachate. An evaluation study on the treatability of the leachate from methane phase bed (MPB) reactor indicated that at an optimum hydraulic retention time of 6 days, the efficiency of the reactor in terms of biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal was 91.29 and 82.69%, respectively. Recycling of the treated leachate through the municipal solid waste layers in the leachate recycling unit (LRU) resulted in a significant increase in the biodegradation of organics present in the leachate. Optimum BOD and COD removal efficiencies were achieved at the third recycle; additional recycling of the leachate did not produce any significant improvement. Physico-chemical treatment of the leachate demonstrated that alum and lime (Option 2) were more economical than coagulants lime and $ MgCO_{3} $. A cost analysis of the economics of the various treatments revealed that the alternative treatment consisting of a MPB bed followed by a LRU and aerated lagoon is the most cost-effective treatment. However, the alternative consisting of a MPB followed by the LRU and a soil column, which is slightly more costly, would be the most appropriate treatment when adequate land is readily available. Cost optimization Leachate Leachate treatment plants Methane phase bed Municipal solid waste Recirculation Singh, Gurdeep aut Enthalten in Environmental monitoring and assessment Springer Netherlands, 1981 135(2007), 1-3 vom: 16. Mai, Seite 107-117 (DE-627)130549649 (DE-600)782621-7 (DE-576)476125413 0167-6369 nnns volume:135 year:2007 number:1-3 day:16 month:05 pages:107-117 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9714-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 AR 135 2007 1-3 16 05 107-117 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10661-007-9714-2 doi (DE-627)OLC2073726887 (DE-He213)s10661-007-9714-2-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 VZ Gupta, S. K. verfasserin aut Assessment of the efficiency and economic viability of various methods of treatment of sanitary landfill leachate 2007 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract This study assesses the efficiency of various physico-chemical, biological and other tertiary methods for treating leachate. An evaluation study on the treatability of the leachate from methane phase bed (MPB) reactor indicated that at an optimum hydraulic retention time of 6 days, the efficiency of the reactor in terms of biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal was 91.29 and 82.69%, respectively. Recycling of the treated leachate through the municipal solid waste layers in the leachate recycling unit (LRU) resulted in a significant increase in the biodegradation of organics present in the leachate. Optimum BOD and COD removal efficiencies were achieved at the third recycle; additional recycling of the leachate did not produce any significant improvement. Physico-chemical treatment of the leachate demonstrated that alum and lime (Option 2) were more economical than coagulants lime and $ MgCO_{3} $. A cost analysis of the economics of the various treatments revealed that the alternative treatment consisting of a MPB bed followed by a LRU and aerated lagoon is the most cost-effective treatment. However, the alternative consisting of a MPB followed by the LRU and a soil column, which is slightly more costly, would be the most appropriate treatment when adequate land is readily available. Cost optimization Leachate Leachate treatment plants Methane phase bed Municipal solid waste Recirculation Singh, Gurdeep aut Enthalten in Environmental monitoring and assessment Springer Netherlands, 1981 135(2007), 1-3 vom: 16. Mai, Seite 107-117 (DE-627)130549649 (DE-600)782621-7 (DE-576)476125413 0167-6369 nnns volume:135 year:2007 number:1-3 day:16 month:05 pages:107-117 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9714-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 AR 135 2007 1-3 16 05 107-117 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10661-007-9714-2 doi (DE-627)OLC2073726887 (DE-He213)s10661-007-9714-2-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 VZ Gupta, S. K. verfasserin aut Assessment of the efficiency and economic viability of various methods of treatment of sanitary landfill leachate 2007 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract This study assesses the efficiency of various physico-chemical, biological and other tertiary methods for treating leachate. An evaluation study on the treatability of the leachate from methane phase bed (MPB) reactor indicated that at an optimum hydraulic retention time of 6 days, the efficiency of the reactor in terms of biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal was 91.29 and 82.69%, respectively. Recycling of the treated leachate through the municipal solid waste layers in the leachate recycling unit (LRU) resulted in a significant increase in the biodegradation of organics present in the leachate. Optimum BOD and COD removal efficiencies were achieved at the third recycle; additional recycling of the leachate did not produce any significant improvement. Physico-chemical treatment of the leachate demonstrated that alum and lime (Option 2) were more economical than coagulants lime and $ MgCO_{3} $. A cost analysis of the economics of the various treatments revealed that the alternative treatment consisting of a MPB bed followed by a LRU and aerated lagoon is the most cost-effective treatment. However, the alternative consisting of a MPB followed by the LRU and a soil column, which is slightly more costly, would be the most appropriate treatment when adequate land is readily available. Cost optimization Leachate Leachate treatment plants Methane phase bed Municipal solid waste Recirculation Singh, Gurdeep aut Enthalten in Environmental monitoring and assessment Springer Netherlands, 1981 135(2007), 1-3 vom: 16. Mai, Seite 107-117 (DE-627)130549649 (DE-600)782621-7 (DE-576)476125413 0167-6369 nnns volume:135 year:2007 number:1-3 day:16 month:05 pages:107-117 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9714-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 AR 135 2007 1-3 16 05 107-117 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10661-007-9714-2 doi (DE-627)OLC2073726887 (DE-He213)s10661-007-9714-2-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 VZ Gupta, S. K. verfasserin aut Assessment of the efficiency and economic viability of various methods of treatment of sanitary landfill leachate 2007 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract This study assesses the efficiency of various physico-chemical, biological and other tertiary methods for treating leachate. An evaluation study on the treatability of the leachate from methane phase bed (MPB) reactor indicated that at an optimum hydraulic retention time of 6 days, the efficiency of the reactor in terms of biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal was 91.29 and 82.69%, respectively. Recycling of the treated leachate through the municipal solid waste layers in the leachate recycling unit (LRU) resulted in a significant increase in the biodegradation of organics present in the leachate. Optimum BOD and COD removal efficiencies were achieved at the third recycle; additional recycling of the leachate did not produce any significant improvement. Physico-chemical treatment of the leachate demonstrated that alum and lime (Option 2) were more economical than coagulants lime and $ MgCO_{3} $. A cost analysis of the economics of the various treatments revealed that the alternative treatment consisting of a MPB bed followed by a LRU and aerated lagoon is the most cost-effective treatment. However, the alternative consisting of a MPB followed by the LRU and a soil column, which is slightly more costly, would be the most appropriate treatment when adequate land is readily available. Cost optimization Leachate Leachate treatment plants Methane phase bed Municipal solid waste Recirculation Singh, Gurdeep aut Enthalten in Environmental monitoring and assessment Springer Netherlands, 1981 135(2007), 1-3 vom: 16. Mai, Seite 107-117 (DE-627)130549649 (DE-600)782621-7 (DE-576)476125413 0167-6369 nnns volume:135 year:2007 number:1-3 day:16 month:05 pages:107-117 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9714-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 AR 135 2007 1-3 16 05 107-117 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10661-007-9714-2 doi (DE-627)OLC2073726887 (DE-He213)s10661-007-9714-2-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 VZ Gupta, S. K. verfasserin aut Assessment of the efficiency and economic viability of various methods of treatment of sanitary landfill leachate 2007 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract This study assesses the efficiency of various physico-chemical, biological and other tertiary methods for treating leachate. An evaluation study on the treatability of the leachate from methane phase bed (MPB) reactor indicated that at an optimum hydraulic retention time of 6 days, the efficiency of the reactor in terms of biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal was 91.29 and 82.69%, respectively. Recycling of the treated leachate through the municipal solid waste layers in the leachate recycling unit (LRU) resulted in a significant increase in the biodegradation of organics present in the leachate. Optimum BOD and COD removal efficiencies were achieved at the third recycle; additional recycling of the leachate did not produce any significant improvement. Physico-chemical treatment of the leachate demonstrated that alum and lime (Option 2) were more economical than coagulants lime and $ MgCO_{3} $. A cost analysis of the economics of the various treatments revealed that the alternative treatment consisting of a MPB bed followed by a LRU and aerated lagoon is the most cost-effective treatment. However, the alternative consisting of a MPB followed by the LRU and a soil column, which is slightly more costly, would be the most appropriate treatment when adequate land is readily available. Cost optimization Leachate Leachate treatment plants Methane phase bed Municipal solid waste Recirculation Singh, Gurdeep aut Enthalten in Environmental monitoring and assessment Springer Netherlands, 1981 135(2007), 1-3 vom: 16. Mai, Seite 107-117 (DE-627)130549649 (DE-600)782621-7 (DE-576)476125413 0167-6369 nnns volume:135 year:2007 number:1-3 day:16 month:05 pages:107-117 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9714-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 AR 135 2007 1-3 16 05 107-117 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Environmental monitoring and assessment 135(2007), 1-3 vom: 16. Mai, Seite 107-117 volume:135 year:2007 number:1-3 day:16 month:05 pages:107-117 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Environmental monitoring and assessment 135(2007), 1-3 vom: 16. Mai, Seite 107-117 volume:135 year:2007 number:1-3 day:16 month:05 pages:107-117 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Cost optimization Leachate Leachate treatment plants Methane phase bed Municipal solid waste Recirculation |
| dewey-raw |
333.7 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Gupta, S. K. @@aut@@ Singh, Gurdeep @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2007-05-16T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
130549649 |
| dewey-sort |
3333.7 |
| id |
OLC2073726887 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2073726887</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503051753.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2007 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10661-007-9714-2</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2073726887</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10661-007-9714-2-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gupta, S. K.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Assessment of the efficiency and economic viability of various methods of treatment of sanitary landfill leachate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This study assesses the efficiency of various physico-chemical, biological and other tertiary methods for treating leachate. An evaluation study on the treatability of the leachate from methane phase bed (MPB) reactor indicated that at an optimum hydraulic retention time of 6 days, the efficiency of the reactor in terms of biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal was 91.29 and 82.69%, respectively. Recycling of the treated leachate through the municipal solid waste layers in the leachate recycling unit (LRU) resulted in a significant increase in the biodegradation of organics present in the leachate. Optimum BOD and COD removal efficiencies were achieved at the third recycle; additional recycling of the leachate did not produce any significant improvement. Physico-chemical treatment of the leachate demonstrated that alum and lime (Option 2) were more economical than coagulants lime and $ MgCO_{3} $. A cost analysis of the economics of the various treatments revealed that the alternative treatment consisting of a MPB bed followed by a LRU and aerated lagoon is the most cost-effective treatment. However, the alternative consisting of a MPB followed by the LRU and a soil column, which is slightly more costly, would be the most appropriate treatment when adequate land is readily available.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cost optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Leachate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Leachate treatment plants</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Methane phase bed</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Municipal solid waste</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recirculation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Singh, Gurdeep</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Environmental monitoring and assessment</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1981</subfield><subfield code="g">135(2007), 1-3 vom: 16. Mai, Seite 107-117</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130549649</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)782621-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)476125413</subfield><subfield code="x">0167-6369</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:135</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2007</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1-3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:16</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:107-117</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9714-2</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">135</subfield><subfield code="j">2007</subfield><subfield code="e">1-3</subfield><subfield code="b">16</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">107-117</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Gupta, S. K. |
| spellingShingle |
Gupta, S. K. ddc 333.7 misc Cost optimization misc Leachate misc Leachate treatment plants misc Methane phase bed misc Municipal solid waste misc Recirculation Assessment of the efficiency and economic viability of various methods of treatment of sanitary landfill leachate |
| authorStr |
Gupta, S. K. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130549649 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
333 - Economics of land & energy |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0167-6369 |
| topic_title |
333.7 VZ Assessment of the efficiency and economic viability of various methods of treatment of sanitary landfill leachate Cost optimization Leachate Leachate treatment plants Methane phase bed Municipal solid waste Recirculation |
| topic |
ddc 333.7 misc Cost optimization misc Leachate misc Leachate treatment plants misc Methane phase bed misc Municipal solid waste misc Recirculation |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 333.7 misc Cost optimization misc Leachate misc Leachate treatment plants misc Methane phase bed misc Municipal solid waste misc Recirculation |
| topic_browse |
ddc 333.7 misc Cost optimization misc Leachate misc Leachate treatment plants misc Methane phase bed misc Municipal solid waste misc Recirculation |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
130549649 |
| dewey-tens |
330 - Economics |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130549649 (DE-600)782621-7 (DE-576)476125413 |
| title |
Assessment of the efficiency and economic viability of various methods of treatment of sanitary landfill leachate |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2073726887 (DE-He213)s10661-007-9714-2-p |
| title_full |
Assessment of the efficiency and economic viability of various methods of treatment of sanitary landfill leachate |
| author_sort |
Gupta, S. K. |
| journal |
Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| journalStr |
Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2007 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
107 |
| author_browse |
Gupta, S. K. Singh, Gurdeep |
| container_volume |
135 |
| class |
333.7 VZ |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Gupta, S. K. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10661-007-9714-2 |
| dewey-full |
333.7 |
| title_sort |
assessment of the efficiency and economic viability of various methods of treatment of sanitary landfill leachate |
| title_auth |
Assessment of the efficiency and economic viability of various methods of treatment of sanitary landfill leachate |
| abstract |
Abstract This study assesses the efficiency of various physico-chemical, biological and other tertiary methods for treating leachate. An evaluation study on the treatability of the leachate from methane phase bed (MPB) reactor indicated that at an optimum hydraulic retention time of 6 days, the efficiency of the reactor in terms of biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal was 91.29 and 82.69%, respectively. Recycling of the treated leachate through the municipal solid waste layers in the leachate recycling unit (LRU) resulted in a significant increase in the biodegradation of organics present in the leachate. Optimum BOD and COD removal efficiencies were achieved at the third recycle; additional recycling of the leachate did not produce any significant improvement. Physico-chemical treatment of the leachate demonstrated that alum and lime (Option 2) were more economical than coagulants lime and $ MgCO_{3} $. A cost analysis of the economics of the various treatments revealed that the alternative treatment consisting of a MPB bed followed by a LRU and aerated lagoon is the most cost-effective treatment. However, the alternative consisting of a MPB followed by the LRU and a soil column, which is slightly more costly, would be the most appropriate treatment when adequate land is readily available. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract This study assesses the efficiency of various physico-chemical, biological and other tertiary methods for treating leachate. An evaluation study on the treatability of the leachate from methane phase bed (MPB) reactor indicated that at an optimum hydraulic retention time of 6 days, the efficiency of the reactor in terms of biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal was 91.29 and 82.69%, respectively. Recycling of the treated leachate through the municipal solid waste layers in the leachate recycling unit (LRU) resulted in a significant increase in the biodegradation of organics present in the leachate. Optimum BOD and COD removal efficiencies were achieved at the third recycle; additional recycling of the leachate did not produce any significant improvement. Physico-chemical treatment of the leachate demonstrated that alum and lime (Option 2) were more economical than coagulants lime and $ MgCO_{3} $. A cost analysis of the economics of the various treatments revealed that the alternative treatment consisting of a MPB bed followed by a LRU and aerated lagoon is the most cost-effective treatment. However, the alternative consisting of a MPB followed by the LRU and a soil column, which is slightly more costly, would be the most appropriate treatment when adequate land is readily available. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract This study assesses the efficiency of various physico-chemical, biological and other tertiary methods for treating leachate. An evaluation study on the treatability of the leachate from methane phase bed (MPB) reactor indicated that at an optimum hydraulic retention time of 6 days, the efficiency of the reactor in terms of biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal was 91.29 and 82.69%, respectively. Recycling of the treated leachate through the municipal solid waste layers in the leachate recycling unit (LRU) resulted in a significant increase in the biodegradation of organics present in the leachate. Optimum BOD and COD removal efficiencies were achieved at the third recycle; additional recycling of the leachate did not produce any significant improvement. Physico-chemical treatment of the leachate demonstrated that alum and lime (Option 2) were more economical than coagulants lime and $ MgCO_{3} $. A cost analysis of the economics of the various treatments revealed that the alternative treatment consisting of a MPB bed followed by a LRU and aerated lagoon is the most cost-effective treatment. However, the alternative consisting of a MPB followed by the LRU and a soil column, which is slightly more costly, would be the most appropriate treatment when adequate land is readily available. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 |
| container_issue |
1-3 |
| title_short |
Assessment of the efficiency and economic viability of various methods of treatment of sanitary landfill leachate |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9714-2 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Singh, Gurdeep |
| author2Str |
Singh, Gurdeep |
| ppnlink |
130549649 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10661-007-9714-2 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T19:33:49.495Z |
| _version_ |
1803587660811337728 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2073726887</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503051753.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2007 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10661-007-9714-2</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2073726887</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10661-007-9714-2-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gupta, S. K.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Assessment of the efficiency and economic viability of various methods of treatment of sanitary landfill leachate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This study assesses the efficiency of various physico-chemical, biological and other tertiary methods for treating leachate. An evaluation study on the treatability of the leachate from methane phase bed (MPB) reactor indicated that at an optimum hydraulic retention time of 6 days, the efficiency of the reactor in terms of biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal was 91.29 and 82.69%, respectively. Recycling of the treated leachate through the municipal solid waste layers in the leachate recycling unit (LRU) resulted in a significant increase in the biodegradation of organics present in the leachate. Optimum BOD and COD removal efficiencies were achieved at the third recycle; additional recycling of the leachate did not produce any significant improvement. Physico-chemical treatment of the leachate demonstrated that alum and lime (Option 2) were more economical than coagulants lime and $ MgCO_{3} $. A cost analysis of the economics of the various treatments revealed that the alternative treatment consisting of a MPB bed followed by a LRU and aerated lagoon is the most cost-effective treatment. However, the alternative consisting of a MPB followed by the LRU and a soil column, which is slightly more costly, would be the most appropriate treatment when adequate land is readily available.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cost optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Leachate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Leachate treatment plants</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Methane phase bed</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Municipal solid waste</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recirculation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Singh, Gurdeep</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Environmental monitoring and assessment</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1981</subfield><subfield code="g">135(2007), 1-3 vom: 16. Mai, Seite 107-117</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130549649</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)782621-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)476125413</subfield><subfield code="x">0167-6369</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:135</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2007</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1-3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:16</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:107-117</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9714-2</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">135</subfield><subfield code="j">2007</subfield><subfield code="e">1-3</subfield><subfield code="b">16</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">107-117</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3993473 |