Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation
Abstract Increasing greenhouse gaseous concentration in the atmosphere is perturbing the environment to cause grievous global warming and associated consequences. Following the rule that only measurable is manageable, mensuration of greenhouse gas intensiveness of different products, bodies, and pro...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Pandey, Divya [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2010 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Environmental monitoring and assessment - Springer Netherlands, 1981, 178(2010), 1-4 vom: 18. Sept., Seite 135-160 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:178 ; year:2010 ; number:1-4 ; day:18 ; month:09 ; pages:135-160 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2073743900 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2073743900 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503051956.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s2010 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2073743900 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10661-010-1678-y-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 333.7 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Pandey, Divya |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Increasing greenhouse gaseous concentration in the atmosphere is perturbing the environment to cause grievous global warming and associated consequences. Following the rule that only measurable is manageable, mensuration of greenhouse gas intensiveness of different products, bodies, and processes is going on worldwide, expressed as their carbon footprints. The methodologies for carbon footprint calculations are still evolving and it is emerging as an important tool for greenhouse gas management. The concept of carbon footprinting has permeated and is being commercialized in all the areas of life and economy, but there is little coherence in definitions and calculations of carbon footprints among the studies. There are disagreements in the selection of gases, and the order of emissions to be covered in footprint calculations. Standards of greenhouse gas accounting are the common resources used in footprint calculations, although there is no mandatory provision of footprint verification. Carbon footprinting is intended to be a tool to guide the relevant emission cuts and verifications, its standardization at international level are therefore necessary. Present review describes the prevailing carbon footprinting methods and raises the related issues. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Carbon footprint | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Direct emissions | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Embodied emissions | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Greenhouse gases | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Agrawal, Madhoolika |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pandey, Jai Shanker |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Environmental monitoring and assessment |d Springer Netherlands, 1981 |g 178(2010), 1-4 vom: 18. Sept., Seite 135-160 |w (DE-627)130549649 |w (DE-600)782621-7 |w (DE-576)476125413 |x 0167-6369 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:178 |g year:2010 |g number:1-4 |g day:18 |g month:09 |g pages:135-160 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-UMW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-FOR | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-IBL | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4219 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 178 |j 2010 |e 1-4 |b 18 |c 09 |h 135-160 | ||
| author_variant |
d p dp m a ma j s p js jsp |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:01676369:2010----::abnotrncretehdo |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2010 |
| publishDate |
2010 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y doi (DE-627)OLC2073743900 (DE-He213)s10661-010-1678-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 VZ Pandey, Divya verfasserin aut Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation 2010 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 Abstract Increasing greenhouse gaseous concentration in the atmosphere is perturbing the environment to cause grievous global warming and associated consequences. Following the rule that only measurable is manageable, mensuration of greenhouse gas intensiveness of different products, bodies, and processes is going on worldwide, expressed as their carbon footprints. The methodologies for carbon footprint calculations are still evolving and it is emerging as an important tool for greenhouse gas management. The concept of carbon footprinting has permeated and is being commercialized in all the areas of life and economy, but there is little coherence in definitions and calculations of carbon footprints among the studies. There are disagreements in the selection of gases, and the order of emissions to be covered in footprint calculations. Standards of greenhouse gas accounting are the common resources used in footprint calculations, although there is no mandatory provision of footprint verification. Carbon footprinting is intended to be a tool to guide the relevant emission cuts and verifications, its standardization at international level are therefore necessary. Present review describes the prevailing carbon footprinting methods and raises the related issues. Carbon footprint Direct emissions Embodied emissions Greenhouse gases Agrawal, Madhoolika aut Pandey, Jai Shanker aut Enthalten in Environmental monitoring and assessment Springer Netherlands, 1981 178(2010), 1-4 vom: 18. Sept., Seite 135-160 (DE-627)130549649 (DE-600)782621-7 (DE-576)476125413 0167-6369 nnns volume:178 year:2010 number:1-4 day:18 month:09 pages:135-160 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 AR 178 2010 1-4 18 09 135-160 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y doi (DE-627)OLC2073743900 (DE-He213)s10661-010-1678-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 VZ Pandey, Divya verfasserin aut Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation 2010 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 Abstract Increasing greenhouse gaseous concentration in the atmosphere is perturbing the environment to cause grievous global warming and associated consequences. Following the rule that only measurable is manageable, mensuration of greenhouse gas intensiveness of different products, bodies, and processes is going on worldwide, expressed as their carbon footprints. The methodologies for carbon footprint calculations are still evolving and it is emerging as an important tool for greenhouse gas management. The concept of carbon footprinting has permeated and is being commercialized in all the areas of life and economy, but there is little coherence in definitions and calculations of carbon footprints among the studies. There are disagreements in the selection of gases, and the order of emissions to be covered in footprint calculations. Standards of greenhouse gas accounting are the common resources used in footprint calculations, although there is no mandatory provision of footprint verification. Carbon footprinting is intended to be a tool to guide the relevant emission cuts and verifications, its standardization at international level are therefore necessary. Present review describes the prevailing carbon footprinting methods and raises the related issues. Carbon footprint Direct emissions Embodied emissions Greenhouse gases Agrawal, Madhoolika aut Pandey, Jai Shanker aut Enthalten in Environmental monitoring and assessment Springer Netherlands, 1981 178(2010), 1-4 vom: 18. Sept., Seite 135-160 (DE-627)130549649 (DE-600)782621-7 (DE-576)476125413 0167-6369 nnns volume:178 year:2010 number:1-4 day:18 month:09 pages:135-160 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 AR 178 2010 1-4 18 09 135-160 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y doi (DE-627)OLC2073743900 (DE-He213)s10661-010-1678-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 VZ Pandey, Divya verfasserin aut Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation 2010 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 Abstract Increasing greenhouse gaseous concentration in the atmosphere is perturbing the environment to cause grievous global warming and associated consequences. Following the rule that only measurable is manageable, mensuration of greenhouse gas intensiveness of different products, bodies, and processes is going on worldwide, expressed as their carbon footprints. The methodologies for carbon footprint calculations are still evolving and it is emerging as an important tool for greenhouse gas management. The concept of carbon footprinting has permeated and is being commercialized in all the areas of life and economy, but there is little coherence in definitions and calculations of carbon footprints among the studies. There are disagreements in the selection of gases, and the order of emissions to be covered in footprint calculations. Standards of greenhouse gas accounting are the common resources used in footprint calculations, although there is no mandatory provision of footprint verification. Carbon footprinting is intended to be a tool to guide the relevant emission cuts and verifications, its standardization at international level are therefore necessary. Present review describes the prevailing carbon footprinting methods and raises the related issues. Carbon footprint Direct emissions Embodied emissions Greenhouse gases Agrawal, Madhoolika aut Pandey, Jai Shanker aut Enthalten in Environmental monitoring and assessment Springer Netherlands, 1981 178(2010), 1-4 vom: 18. Sept., Seite 135-160 (DE-627)130549649 (DE-600)782621-7 (DE-576)476125413 0167-6369 nnns volume:178 year:2010 number:1-4 day:18 month:09 pages:135-160 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 AR 178 2010 1-4 18 09 135-160 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y doi (DE-627)OLC2073743900 (DE-He213)s10661-010-1678-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 VZ Pandey, Divya verfasserin aut Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation 2010 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 Abstract Increasing greenhouse gaseous concentration in the atmosphere is perturbing the environment to cause grievous global warming and associated consequences. Following the rule that only measurable is manageable, mensuration of greenhouse gas intensiveness of different products, bodies, and processes is going on worldwide, expressed as their carbon footprints. The methodologies for carbon footprint calculations are still evolving and it is emerging as an important tool for greenhouse gas management. The concept of carbon footprinting has permeated and is being commercialized in all the areas of life and economy, but there is little coherence in definitions and calculations of carbon footprints among the studies. There are disagreements in the selection of gases, and the order of emissions to be covered in footprint calculations. Standards of greenhouse gas accounting are the common resources used in footprint calculations, although there is no mandatory provision of footprint verification. Carbon footprinting is intended to be a tool to guide the relevant emission cuts and verifications, its standardization at international level are therefore necessary. Present review describes the prevailing carbon footprinting methods and raises the related issues. Carbon footprint Direct emissions Embodied emissions Greenhouse gases Agrawal, Madhoolika aut Pandey, Jai Shanker aut Enthalten in Environmental monitoring and assessment Springer Netherlands, 1981 178(2010), 1-4 vom: 18. Sept., Seite 135-160 (DE-627)130549649 (DE-600)782621-7 (DE-576)476125413 0167-6369 nnns volume:178 year:2010 number:1-4 day:18 month:09 pages:135-160 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 AR 178 2010 1-4 18 09 135-160 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y doi (DE-627)OLC2073743900 (DE-He213)s10661-010-1678-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 VZ Pandey, Divya verfasserin aut Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation 2010 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 Abstract Increasing greenhouse gaseous concentration in the atmosphere is perturbing the environment to cause grievous global warming and associated consequences. Following the rule that only measurable is manageable, mensuration of greenhouse gas intensiveness of different products, bodies, and processes is going on worldwide, expressed as their carbon footprints. The methodologies for carbon footprint calculations are still evolving and it is emerging as an important tool for greenhouse gas management. The concept of carbon footprinting has permeated and is being commercialized in all the areas of life and economy, but there is little coherence in definitions and calculations of carbon footprints among the studies. There are disagreements in the selection of gases, and the order of emissions to be covered in footprint calculations. Standards of greenhouse gas accounting are the common resources used in footprint calculations, although there is no mandatory provision of footprint verification. Carbon footprinting is intended to be a tool to guide the relevant emission cuts and verifications, its standardization at international level are therefore necessary. Present review describes the prevailing carbon footprinting methods and raises the related issues. Carbon footprint Direct emissions Embodied emissions Greenhouse gases Agrawal, Madhoolika aut Pandey, Jai Shanker aut Enthalten in Environmental monitoring and assessment Springer Netherlands, 1981 178(2010), 1-4 vom: 18. Sept., Seite 135-160 (DE-627)130549649 (DE-600)782621-7 (DE-576)476125413 0167-6369 nnns volume:178 year:2010 number:1-4 day:18 month:09 pages:135-160 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 AR 178 2010 1-4 18 09 135-160 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Environmental monitoring and assessment 178(2010), 1-4 vom: 18. Sept., Seite 135-160 volume:178 year:2010 number:1-4 day:18 month:09 pages:135-160 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Environmental monitoring and assessment 178(2010), 1-4 vom: 18. Sept., Seite 135-160 volume:178 year:2010 number:1-4 day:18 month:09 pages:135-160 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Carbon footprint Direct emissions Embodied emissions Greenhouse gases |
| dewey-raw |
333.7 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Pandey, Divya @@aut@@ Agrawal, Madhoolika @@aut@@ Pandey, Jai Shanker @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2010-09-18T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
130549649 |
| dewey-sort |
3333.7 |
| id |
OLC2073743900 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2073743900</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503051956.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2010 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2073743900</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10661-010-1678-y-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pandey, Divya</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Increasing greenhouse gaseous concentration in the atmosphere is perturbing the environment to cause grievous global warming and associated consequences. Following the rule that only measurable is manageable, mensuration of greenhouse gas intensiveness of different products, bodies, and processes is going on worldwide, expressed as their carbon footprints. The methodologies for carbon footprint calculations are still evolving and it is emerging as an important tool for greenhouse gas management. The concept of carbon footprinting has permeated and is being commercialized in all the areas of life and economy, but there is little coherence in definitions and calculations of carbon footprints among the studies. There are disagreements in the selection of gases, and the order of emissions to be covered in footprint calculations. Standards of greenhouse gas accounting are the common resources used in footprint calculations, although there is no mandatory provision of footprint verification. Carbon footprinting is intended to be a tool to guide the relevant emission cuts and verifications, its standardization at international level are therefore necessary. Present review describes the prevailing carbon footprinting methods and raises the related issues.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Carbon footprint</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Direct emissions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Embodied emissions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Greenhouse gases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Agrawal, Madhoolika</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pandey, Jai Shanker</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Environmental monitoring and assessment</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1981</subfield><subfield code="g">178(2010), 1-4 vom: 18. Sept., Seite 135-160</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130549649</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)782621-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)476125413</subfield><subfield code="x">0167-6369</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:178</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1-4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:18</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:135-160</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">178</subfield><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">1-4</subfield><subfield code="b">18</subfield><subfield code="c">09</subfield><subfield code="h">135-160</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Pandey, Divya |
| spellingShingle |
Pandey, Divya ddc 333.7 misc Carbon footprint misc Direct emissions misc Embodied emissions misc Greenhouse gases Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation |
| authorStr |
Pandey, Divya |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130549649 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
333 - Economics of land & energy |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0167-6369 |
| topic_title |
333.7 VZ Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation Carbon footprint Direct emissions Embodied emissions Greenhouse gases |
| topic |
ddc 333.7 misc Carbon footprint misc Direct emissions misc Embodied emissions misc Greenhouse gases |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 333.7 misc Carbon footprint misc Direct emissions misc Embodied emissions misc Greenhouse gases |
| topic_browse |
ddc 333.7 misc Carbon footprint misc Direct emissions misc Embodied emissions misc Greenhouse gases |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
130549649 |
| dewey-tens |
330 - Economics |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130549649 (DE-600)782621-7 (DE-576)476125413 |
| title |
Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2073743900 (DE-He213)s10661-010-1678-y-p |
| title_full |
Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation |
| author_sort |
Pandey, Divya |
| journal |
Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| journalStr |
Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2010 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
135 |
| author_browse |
Pandey, Divya Agrawal, Madhoolika Pandey, Jai Shanker |
| container_volume |
178 |
| class |
333.7 VZ |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Pandey, Divya |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y |
| dewey-full |
333.7 |
| title_sort |
carbon footprint: current methods of estimation |
| title_auth |
Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation |
| abstract |
Abstract Increasing greenhouse gaseous concentration in the atmosphere is perturbing the environment to cause grievous global warming and associated consequences. Following the rule that only measurable is manageable, mensuration of greenhouse gas intensiveness of different products, bodies, and processes is going on worldwide, expressed as their carbon footprints. The methodologies for carbon footprint calculations are still evolving and it is emerging as an important tool for greenhouse gas management. The concept of carbon footprinting has permeated and is being commercialized in all the areas of life and economy, but there is little coherence in definitions and calculations of carbon footprints among the studies. There are disagreements in the selection of gases, and the order of emissions to be covered in footprint calculations. Standards of greenhouse gas accounting are the common resources used in footprint calculations, although there is no mandatory provision of footprint verification. Carbon footprinting is intended to be a tool to guide the relevant emission cuts and verifications, its standardization at international level are therefore necessary. Present review describes the prevailing carbon footprinting methods and raises the related issues. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Increasing greenhouse gaseous concentration in the atmosphere is perturbing the environment to cause grievous global warming and associated consequences. Following the rule that only measurable is manageable, mensuration of greenhouse gas intensiveness of different products, bodies, and processes is going on worldwide, expressed as their carbon footprints. The methodologies for carbon footprint calculations are still evolving and it is emerging as an important tool for greenhouse gas management. The concept of carbon footprinting has permeated and is being commercialized in all the areas of life and economy, but there is little coherence in definitions and calculations of carbon footprints among the studies. There are disagreements in the selection of gases, and the order of emissions to be covered in footprint calculations. Standards of greenhouse gas accounting are the common resources used in footprint calculations, although there is no mandatory provision of footprint verification. Carbon footprinting is intended to be a tool to guide the relevant emission cuts and verifications, its standardization at international level are therefore necessary. Present review describes the prevailing carbon footprinting methods and raises the related issues. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Increasing greenhouse gaseous concentration in the atmosphere is perturbing the environment to cause grievous global warming and associated consequences. Following the rule that only measurable is manageable, mensuration of greenhouse gas intensiveness of different products, bodies, and processes is going on worldwide, expressed as their carbon footprints. The methodologies for carbon footprint calculations are still evolving and it is emerging as an important tool for greenhouse gas management. The concept of carbon footprinting has permeated and is being commercialized in all the areas of life and economy, but there is little coherence in definitions and calculations of carbon footprints among the studies. There are disagreements in the selection of gases, and the order of emissions to be covered in footprint calculations. Standards of greenhouse gas accounting are the common resources used in footprint calculations, although there is no mandatory provision of footprint verification. Carbon footprinting is intended to be a tool to guide the relevant emission cuts and verifications, its standardization at international level are therefore necessary. Present review describes the prevailing carbon footprinting methods and raises the related issues. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 |
| container_issue |
1-4 |
| title_short |
Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Agrawal, Madhoolika Pandey, Jai Shanker |
| author2Str |
Agrawal, Madhoolika Pandey, Jai Shanker |
| ppnlink |
130549649 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T19:38:34.158Z |
| _version_ |
1803587959294787584 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2073743900</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503051956.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2010 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2073743900</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10661-010-1678-y-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pandey, Divya</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Increasing greenhouse gaseous concentration in the atmosphere is perturbing the environment to cause grievous global warming and associated consequences. Following the rule that only measurable is manageable, mensuration of greenhouse gas intensiveness of different products, bodies, and processes is going on worldwide, expressed as their carbon footprints. The methodologies for carbon footprint calculations are still evolving and it is emerging as an important tool for greenhouse gas management. The concept of carbon footprinting has permeated and is being commercialized in all the areas of life and economy, but there is little coherence in definitions and calculations of carbon footprints among the studies. There are disagreements in the selection of gases, and the order of emissions to be covered in footprint calculations. Standards of greenhouse gas accounting are the common resources used in footprint calculations, although there is no mandatory provision of footprint verification. Carbon footprinting is intended to be a tool to guide the relevant emission cuts and verifications, its standardization at international level are therefore necessary. Present review describes the prevailing carbon footprinting methods and raises the related issues.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Carbon footprint</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Direct emissions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Embodied emissions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Greenhouse gases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Agrawal, Madhoolika</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pandey, Jai Shanker</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Environmental monitoring and assessment</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1981</subfield><subfield code="g">178(2010), 1-4 vom: 18. Sept., Seite 135-160</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130549649</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)782621-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)476125413</subfield><subfield code="x">0167-6369</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:178</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1-4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:18</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:135-160</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">178</subfield><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">1-4</subfield><subfield code="b">18</subfield><subfield code="c">09</subfield><subfield code="h">135-160</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399455 |