What brings your subjects to the lab? A field experiment
Abstract This paper reports a field experiment involving manipulation of invitations to register in an experimental economics subject database. Two types of invitations were sent out: one emphasizing pecuniary and the other non-pecuniary benefits of participation. The former resulted in higher respo...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Krawczyk, Michal [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2011 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2011 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Experimental economics - Springer US, 1998, 14(2011), 4 vom: 29. März, Seite 482-489 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:14 ; year:2011 ; number:4 ; day:29 ; month:03 ; pages:482-489 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10683-011-9277-5 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2073985009 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2073985009 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503055109.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s2011 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10683-011-9277-5 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2073985009 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10683-011-9277-5-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 330 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Krawczyk, Michal |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a What brings your subjects to the lab? A field experiment |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2011 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s) 2011 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract This paper reports a field experiment involving manipulation of invitations to register in an experimental economics subject database. Two types of invitations were sent out: one emphasizing pecuniary and the other non-pecuniary benefits of participation. The former resulted in higher response rate and the strength of this treatment effect was comparable in different groups defined by gender and academic major. In a follow-up test conducted about a year later it was found that individuals recruited by invitations emphasizing monetary benefits were less willing to make an effort to participate in a non-paid survey. The very same survey also showed that they were marginally less altruistic in general. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Experimental economics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Recruitment procedures | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Incentives | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Selection into experiments | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Experimental economics |d Springer US, 1998 |g 14(2011), 4 vom: 29. März, Seite 482-489 |w (DE-627)230492959 |w (DE-600)1386451-8 |w (DE-576)072172029 |x 1386-4157 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2011 |g number:4 |g day:29 |g month:03 |g pages:482-489 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9277-5 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4028 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4318 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 14 |j 2011 |e 4 |b 29 |c 03 |h 482-489 | ||
| author_variant |
m k mk |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:13864157:2011----::htrnsorujcsohlbf |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2011 |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10683-011-9277-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2073985009 (DE-He213)s10683-011-9277-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ Krawczyk, Michal verfasserin aut What brings your subjects to the lab? A field experiment 2011 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2011 Abstract This paper reports a field experiment involving manipulation of invitations to register in an experimental economics subject database. Two types of invitations were sent out: one emphasizing pecuniary and the other non-pecuniary benefits of participation. The former resulted in higher response rate and the strength of this treatment effect was comparable in different groups defined by gender and academic major. In a follow-up test conducted about a year later it was found that individuals recruited by invitations emphasizing monetary benefits were less willing to make an effort to participate in a non-paid survey. The very same survey also showed that they were marginally less altruistic in general. Experimental economics Recruitment procedures Incentives Selection into experiments Enthalten in Experimental economics Springer US, 1998 14(2011), 4 vom: 29. März, Seite 482-489 (DE-627)230492959 (DE-600)1386451-8 (DE-576)072172029 1386-4157 nnns volume:14 year:2011 number:4 day:29 month:03 pages:482-489 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9277-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 14 2011 4 29 03 482-489 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10683-011-9277-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2073985009 (DE-He213)s10683-011-9277-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ Krawczyk, Michal verfasserin aut What brings your subjects to the lab? A field experiment 2011 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2011 Abstract This paper reports a field experiment involving manipulation of invitations to register in an experimental economics subject database. Two types of invitations were sent out: one emphasizing pecuniary and the other non-pecuniary benefits of participation. The former resulted in higher response rate and the strength of this treatment effect was comparable in different groups defined by gender and academic major. In a follow-up test conducted about a year later it was found that individuals recruited by invitations emphasizing monetary benefits were less willing to make an effort to participate in a non-paid survey. The very same survey also showed that they were marginally less altruistic in general. Experimental economics Recruitment procedures Incentives Selection into experiments Enthalten in Experimental economics Springer US, 1998 14(2011), 4 vom: 29. März, Seite 482-489 (DE-627)230492959 (DE-600)1386451-8 (DE-576)072172029 1386-4157 nnns volume:14 year:2011 number:4 day:29 month:03 pages:482-489 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9277-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 14 2011 4 29 03 482-489 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10683-011-9277-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2073985009 (DE-He213)s10683-011-9277-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ Krawczyk, Michal verfasserin aut What brings your subjects to the lab? A field experiment 2011 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2011 Abstract This paper reports a field experiment involving manipulation of invitations to register in an experimental economics subject database. Two types of invitations were sent out: one emphasizing pecuniary and the other non-pecuniary benefits of participation. The former resulted in higher response rate and the strength of this treatment effect was comparable in different groups defined by gender and academic major. In a follow-up test conducted about a year later it was found that individuals recruited by invitations emphasizing monetary benefits were less willing to make an effort to participate in a non-paid survey. The very same survey also showed that they were marginally less altruistic in general. Experimental economics Recruitment procedures Incentives Selection into experiments Enthalten in Experimental economics Springer US, 1998 14(2011), 4 vom: 29. März, Seite 482-489 (DE-627)230492959 (DE-600)1386451-8 (DE-576)072172029 1386-4157 nnns volume:14 year:2011 number:4 day:29 month:03 pages:482-489 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9277-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 14 2011 4 29 03 482-489 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10683-011-9277-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2073985009 (DE-He213)s10683-011-9277-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ Krawczyk, Michal verfasserin aut What brings your subjects to the lab? A field experiment 2011 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2011 Abstract This paper reports a field experiment involving manipulation of invitations to register in an experimental economics subject database. Two types of invitations were sent out: one emphasizing pecuniary and the other non-pecuniary benefits of participation. The former resulted in higher response rate and the strength of this treatment effect was comparable in different groups defined by gender and academic major. In a follow-up test conducted about a year later it was found that individuals recruited by invitations emphasizing monetary benefits were less willing to make an effort to participate in a non-paid survey. The very same survey also showed that they were marginally less altruistic in general. Experimental economics Recruitment procedures Incentives Selection into experiments Enthalten in Experimental economics Springer US, 1998 14(2011), 4 vom: 29. März, Seite 482-489 (DE-627)230492959 (DE-600)1386451-8 (DE-576)072172029 1386-4157 nnns volume:14 year:2011 number:4 day:29 month:03 pages:482-489 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9277-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 14 2011 4 29 03 482-489 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10683-011-9277-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2073985009 (DE-He213)s10683-011-9277-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ Krawczyk, Michal verfasserin aut What brings your subjects to the lab? A field experiment 2011 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2011 Abstract This paper reports a field experiment involving manipulation of invitations to register in an experimental economics subject database. Two types of invitations were sent out: one emphasizing pecuniary and the other non-pecuniary benefits of participation. The former resulted in higher response rate and the strength of this treatment effect was comparable in different groups defined by gender and academic major. In a follow-up test conducted about a year later it was found that individuals recruited by invitations emphasizing monetary benefits were less willing to make an effort to participate in a non-paid survey. The very same survey also showed that they were marginally less altruistic in general. Experimental economics Recruitment procedures Incentives Selection into experiments Enthalten in Experimental economics Springer US, 1998 14(2011), 4 vom: 29. März, Seite 482-489 (DE-627)230492959 (DE-600)1386451-8 (DE-576)072172029 1386-4157 nnns volume:14 year:2011 number:4 day:29 month:03 pages:482-489 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9277-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 14 2011 4 29 03 482-489 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Experimental economics 14(2011), 4 vom: 29. März, Seite 482-489 volume:14 year:2011 number:4 day:29 month:03 pages:482-489 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Experimental economics 14(2011), 4 vom: 29. März, Seite 482-489 volume:14 year:2011 number:4 day:29 month:03 pages:482-489 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Experimental economics Recruitment procedures Incentives Selection into experiments |
| dewey-raw |
330 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Experimental economics |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Krawczyk, Michal @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2011-03-29T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
230492959 |
| dewey-sort |
3330 |
| id |
OLC2073985009 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2073985009</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503055109.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2011 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10683-011-9277-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2073985009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10683-011-9277-5-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Krawczyk, Michal</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">What brings your subjects to the lab? A field experiment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This paper reports a field experiment involving manipulation of invitations to register in an experimental economics subject database. Two types of invitations were sent out: one emphasizing pecuniary and the other non-pecuniary benefits of participation. The former resulted in higher response rate and the strength of this treatment effect was comparable in different groups defined by gender and academic major. In a follow-up test conducted about a year later it was found that individuals recruited by invitations emphasizing monetary benefits were less willing to make an effort to participate in a non-paid survey. The very same survey also showed that they were marginally less altruistic in general.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Experimental economics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recruitment procedures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Incentives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Selection into experiments</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Experimental economics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">14(2011), 4 vom: 29. März, Seite 482-489</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)230492959</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1386451-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)072172029</subfield><subfield code="x">1386-4157</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:29</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:482-489</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9277-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">29</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">482-489</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Krawczyk, Michal |
| spellingShingle |
Krawczyk, Michal ddc 330 misc Experimental economics misc Recruitment procedures misc Incentives misc Selection into experiments What brings your subjects to the lab? A field experiment |
| authorStr |
Krawczyk, Michal |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)230492959 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
330 - Economics |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1386-4157 |
| topic_title |
330 VZ What brings your subjects to the lab? A field experiment Experimental economics Recruitment procedures Incentives Selection into experiments |
| topic |
ddc 330 misc Experimental economics misc Recruitment procedures misc Incentives misc Selection into experiments |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 330 misc Experimental economics misc Recruitment procedures misc Incentives misc Selection into experiments |
| topic_browse |
ddc 330 misc Experimental economics misc Recruitment procedures misc Incentives misc Selection into experiments |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Experimental economics |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
230492959 |
| dewey-tens |
330 - Economics |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Experimental economics |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)230492959 (DE-600)1386451-8 (DE-576)072172029 |
| title |
What brings your subjects to the lab? A field experiment |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2073985009 (DE-He213)s10683-011-9277-5-p |
| title_full |
What brings your subjects to the lab? A field experiment |
| author_sort |
Krawczyk, Michal |
| journal |
Experimental economics |
| journalStr |
Experimental economics |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2011 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
482 |
| author_browse |
Krawczyk, Michal |
| container_volume |
14 |
| class |
330 VZ |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Krawczyk, Michal |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10683-011-9277-5 |
| dewey-full |
330 |
| title_sort |
what brings your subjects to the lab? a field experiment |
| title_auth |
What brings your subjects to the lab? A field experiment |
| abstract |
Abstract This paper reports a field experiment involving manipulation of invitations to register in an experimental economics subject database. Two types of invitations were sent out: one emphasizing pecuniary and the other non-pecuniary benefits of participation. The former resulted in higher response rate and the strength of this treatment effect was comparable in different groups defined by gender and academic major. In a follow-up test conducted about a year later it was found that individuals recruited by invitations emphasizing monetary benefits were less willing to make an effort to participate in a non-paid survey. The very same survey also showed that they were marginally less altruistic in general. © The Author(s) 2011 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract This paper reports a field experiment involving manipulation of invitations to register in an experimental economics subject database. Two types of invitations were sent out: one emphasizing pecuniary and the other non-pecuniary benefits of participation. The former resulted in higher response rate and the strength of this treatment effect was comparable in different groups defined by gender and academic major. In a follow-up test conducted about a year later it was found that individuals recruited by invitations emphasizing monetary benefits were less willing to make an effort to participate in a non-paid survey. The very same survey also showed that they were marginally less altruistic in general. © The Author(s) 2011 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract This paper reports a field experiment involving manipulation of invitations to register in an experimental economics subject database. Two types of invitations were sent out: one emphasizing pecuniary and the other non-pecuniary benefits of participation. The former resulted in higher response rate and the strength of this treatment effect was comparable in different groups defined by gender and academic major. In a follow-up test conducted about a year later it was found that individuals recruited by invitations emphasizing monetary benefits were less willing to make an effort to participate in a non-paid survey. The very same survey also showed that they were marginally less altruistic in general. © The Author(s) 2011 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4393 |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
What brings your subjects to the lab? A field experiment |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9277-5 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
230492959 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10683-011-9277-5 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T20:29:23.102Z |
| _version_ |
1803591156344291328 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2073985009</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503055109.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2011 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10683-011-9277-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2073985009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10683-011-9277-5-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Krawczyk, Michal</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">What brings your subjects to the lab? A field experiment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This paper reports a field experiment involving manipulation of invitations to register in an experimental economics subject database. Two types of invitations were sent out: one emphasizing pecuniary and the other non-pecuniary benefits of participation. The former resulted in higher response rate and the strength of this treatment effect was comparable in different groups defined by gender and academic major. In a follow-up test conducted about a year later it was found that individuals recruited by invitations emphasizing monetary benefits were less willing to make an effort to participate in a non-paid survey. The very same survey also showed that they were marginally less altruistic in general.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Experimental economics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recruitment procedures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Incentives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Selection into experiments</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Experimental economics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">14(2011), 4 vom: 29. März, Seite 482-489</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)230492959</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1386451-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)072172029</subfield><subfield code="x">1386-4157</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:29</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:482-489</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9277-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">29</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">482-489</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399419 |