Antidumping as Anticompetitive Practice Evidence from the United States and the European Union
Abstract This paper discusses and develops certain observable indices of the nature and effects of dumping and antidumping policy. The object is to analyze each antidumping procedure introduced by the United States (US) and the European Union (EU) for the 1998–2001 period. Using conservative criteri...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Jallab, Mustapha Sadni [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2006 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of industry, competition and trade - Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001, 6(2006), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 253-275 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:6 ; year:2006 ; number:3-4 ; month:12 ; pages:253-275 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10842-006-0026-y |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC207479441X |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC207479441X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230503115337.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 200820s2006 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10842-006-0026-y |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC207479441X | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s10842-006-0026-y-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 330 |a 690 |q VZ |
100 | 1 | |a Jallab, Mustapha Sadni |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Antidumping as Anticompetitive Practice Evidence from the United States and the European Union |
264 | 1 | |c 2006 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006 | ||
520 | |a Abstract This paper discusses and develops certain observable indices of the nature and effects of dumping and antidumping policy. The object is to analyze each antidumping procedure introduced by the United States (US) and the European Union (EU) for the 1998–2001 period. Using conservative criteria, we find that 68.2% of the antidumping procedures introduced by the EU appear to have a questionable economic foundation, meaning that the identified factors suggest that the conduct challenged is unlikely to have any significantly anticompetitive effect. We similarly find a questionable economic foundation in 76% of the analyzed cases in the US. The recommendation that we propose is that it may be appropriate to modify the antidumping law to take into account at a preliminary stage the factors that may indicate the presence or absence of potential anticompetitive effects. | ||
650 | 4 | |a antidumping law | |
650 | 4 | |a monopolizing dumping | |
650 | 4 | |a non-monopolizing dumping | |
650 | 4 | |a case study | |
700 | 1 | |a Kobak, James B. |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of industry, competition and trade |d Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001 |g 6(2006), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 253-275 |w (DE-627)340721324 |w (DE-600)2067120-9 |w (DE-576)102476020 |x 1566-1679 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:6 |g year:2006 |g number:3-4 |g month:12 |g pages:253-275 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-0026-y |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2012 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 6 |j 2006 |e 3-4 |c 12 |h 253-275 |
author_variant |
m s j ms msj j b k jb jbk |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:15661679:2006----::niupnaatcmeiiercievdnermhuiesa |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2006 |
publishDate |
2006 |
allfields |
10.1007/s10842-006-0026-y doi (DE-627)OLC207479441X (DE-He213)s10842-006-0026-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 690 VZ Jallab, Mustapha Sadni verfasserin aut Antidumping as Anticompetitive Practice Evidence from the United States and the European Union 2006 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006 Abstract This paper discusses and develops certain observable indices of the nature and effects of dumping and antidumping policy. The object is to analyze each antidumping procedure introduced by the United States (US) and the European Union (EU) for the 1998–2001 period. Using conservative criteria, we find that 68.2% of the antidumping procedures introduced by the EU appear to have a questionable economic foundation, meaning that the identified factors suggest that the conduct challenged is unlikely to have any significantly anticompetitive effect. We similarly find a questionable economic foundation in 76% of the analyzed cases in the US. The recommendation that we propose is that it may be appropriate to modify the antidumping law to take into account at a preliminary stage the factors that may indicate the presence or absence of potential anticompetitive effects. antidumping law monopolizing dumping non-monopolizing dumping case study Kobak, James B. aut Enthalten in Journal of industry, competition and trade Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001 6(2006), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 253-275 (DE-627)340721324 (DE-600)2067120-9 (DE-576)102476020 1566-1679 nnns volume:6 year:2006 number:3-4 month:12 pages:253-275 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-0026-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2012 AR 6 2006 3-4 12 253-275 |
spelling |
10.1007/s10842-006-0026-y doi (DE-627)OLC207479441X (DE-He213)s10842-006-0026-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 690 VZ Jallab, Mustapha Sadni verfasserin aut Antidumping as Anticompetitive Practice Evidence from the United States and the European Union 2006 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006 Abstract This paper discusses and develops certain observable indices of the nature and effects of dumping and antidumping policy. The object is to analyze each antidumping procedure introduced by the United States (US) and the European Union (EU) for the 1998–2001 period. Using conservative criteria, we find that 68.2% of the antidumping procedures introduced by the EU appear to have a questionable economic foundation, meaning that the identified factors suggest that the conduct challenged is unlikely to have any significantly anticompetitive effect. We similarly find a questionable economic foundation in 76% of the analyzed cases in the US. The recommendation that we propose is that it may be appropriate to modify the antidumping law to take into account at a preliminary stage the factors that may indicate the presence or absence of potential anticompetitive effects. antidumping law monopolizing dumping non-monopolizing dumping case study Kobak, James B. aut Enthalten in Journal of industry, competition and trade Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001 6(2006), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 253-275 (DE-627)340721324 (DE-600)2067120-9 (DE-576)102476020 1566-1679 nnns volume:6 year:2006 number:3-4 month:12 pages:253-275 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-0026-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2012 AR 6 2006 3-4 12 253-275 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10842-006-0026-y doi (DE-627)OLC207479441X (DE-He213)s10842-006-0026-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 690 VZ Jallab, Mustapha Sadni verfasserin aut Antidumping as Anticompetitive Practice Evidence from the United States and the European Union 2006 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006 Abstract This paper discusses and develops certain observable indices of the nature and effects of dumping and antidumping policy. The object is to analyze each antidumping procedure introduced by the United States (US) and the European Union (EU) for the 1998–2001 period. Using conservative criteria, we find that 68.2% of the antidumping procedures introduced by the EU appear to have a questionable economic foundation, meaning that the identified factors suggest that the conduct challenged is unlikely to have any significantly anticompetitive effect. We similarly find a questionable economic foundation in 76% of the analyzed cases in the US. The recommendation that we propose is that it may be appropriate to modify the antidumping law to take into account at a preliminary stage the factors that may indicate the presence or absence of potential anticompetitive effects. antidumping law monopolizing dumping non-monopolizing dumping case study Kobak, James B. aut Enthalten in Journal of industry, competition and trade Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001 6(2006), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 253-275 (DE-627)340721324 (DE-600)2067120-9 (DE-576)102476020 1566-1679 nnns volume:6 year:2006 number:3-4 month:12 pages:253-275 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-0026-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2012 AR 6 2006 3-4 12 253-275 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10842-006-0026-y doi (DE-627)OLC207479441X (DE-He213)s10842-006-0026-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 690 VZ Jallab, Mustapha Sadni verfasserin aut Antidumping as Anticompetitive Practice Evidence from the United States and the European Union 2006 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006 Abstract This paper discusses and develops certain observable indices of the nature and effects of dumping and antidumping policy. The object is to analyze each antidumping procedure introduced by the United States (US) and the European Union (EU) for the 1998–2001 period. Using conservative criteria, we find that 68.2% of the antidumping procedures introduced by the EU appear to have a questionable economic foundation, meaning that the identified factors suggest that the conduct challenged is unlikely to have any significantly anticompetitive effect. We similarly find a questionable economic foundation in 76% of the analyzed cases in the US. The recommendation that we propose is that it may be appropriate to modify the antidumping law to take into account at a preliminary stage the factors that may indicate the presence or absence of potential anticompetitive effects. antidumping law monopolizing dumping non-monopolizing dumping case study Kobak, James B. aut Enthalten in Journal of industry, competition and trade Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001 6(2006), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 253-275 (DE-627)340721324 (DE-600)2067120-9 (DE-576)102476020 1566-1679 nnns volume:6 year:2006 number:3-4 month:12 pages:253-275 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-0026-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2012 AR 6 2006 3-4 12 253-275 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10842-006-0026-y doi (DE-627)OLC207479441X (DE-He213)s10842-006-0026-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 690 VZ Jallab, Mustapha Sadni verfasserin aut Antidumping as Anticompetitive Practice Evidence from the United States and the European Union 2006 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006 Abstract This paper discusses and develops certain observable indices of the nature and effects of dumping and antidumping policy. The object is to analyze each antidumping procedure introduced by the United States (US) and the European Union (EU) for the 1998–2001 period. Using conservative criteria, we find that 68.2% of the antidumping procedures introduced by the EU appear to have a questionable economic foundation, meaning that the identified factors suggest that the conduct challenged is unlikely to have any significantly anticompetitive effect. We similarly find a questionable economic foundation in 76% of the analyzed cases in the US. The recommendation that we propose is that it may be appropriate to modify the antidumping law to take into account at a preliminary stage the factors that may indicate the presence or absence of potential anticompetitive effects. antidumping law monopolizing dumping non-monopolizing dumping case study Kobak, James B. aut Enthalten in Journal of industry, competition and trade Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001 6(2006), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 253-275 (DE-627)340721324 (DE-600)2067120-9 (DE-576)102476020 1566-1679 nnns volume:6 year:2006 number:3-4 month:12 pages:253-275 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-0026-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2012 AR 6 2006 3-4 12 253-275 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Journal of industry, competition and trade 6(2006), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 253-275 volume:6 year:2006 number:3-4 month:12 pages:253-275 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of industry, competition and trade 6(2006), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 253-275 volume:6 year:2006 number:3-4 month:12 pages:253-275 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
antidumping law monopolizing dumping non-monopolizing dumping case study |
dewey-raw |
330 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Journal of industry, competition and trade |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jallab, Mustapha Sadni @@aut@@ Kobak, James B. @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2006-12-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
340721324 |
dewey-sort |
3330 |
id |
OLC207479441X |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC207479441X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503115337.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2006 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10842-006-0026-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC207479441X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10842-006-0026-y-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jallab, Mustapha Sadni</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Antidumping as Anticompetitive Practice Evidence from the United States and the European Union</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This paper discusses and develops certain observable indices of the nature and effects of dumping and antidumping policy. The object is to analyze each antidumping procedure introduced by the United States (US) and the European Union (EU) for the 1998–2001 period. Using conservative criteria, we find that 68.2% of the antidumping procedures introduced by the EU appear to have a questionable economic foundation, meaning that the identified factors suggest that the conduct challenged is unlikely to have any significantly anticompetitive effect. We similarly find a questionable economic foundation in 76% of the analyzed cases in the US. The recommendation that we propose is that it may be appropriate to modify the antidumping law to take into account at a preliminary stage the factors that may indicate the presence or absence of potential anticompetitive effects.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">antidumping law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">monopolizing dumping</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">non-monopolizing dumping</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">case study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kobak, James B.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of industry, competition and trade</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">6(2006), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 253-275</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)340721324</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2067120-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)102476020</subfield><subfield code="x">1566-1679</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:6</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2006</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3-4</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:253-275</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-0026-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">6</subfield><subfield code="j">2006</subfield><subfield code="e">3-4</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">253-275</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Jallab, Mustapha Sadni |
spellingShingle |
Jallab, Mustapha Sadni ddc 330 misc antidumping law misc monopolizing dumping misc non-monopolizing dumping misc case study Antidumping as Anticompetitive Practice Evidence from the United States and the European Union |
authorStr |
Jallab, Mustapha Sadni |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)340721324 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
330 - Economics 690 - Buildings |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1566-1679 |
topic_title |
330 690 VZ Antidumping as Anticompetitive Practice Evidence from the United States and the European Union antidumping law monopolizing dumping non-monopolizing dumping case study |
topic |
ddc 330 misc antidumping law misc monopolizing dumping misc non-monopolizing dumping misc case study |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 330 misc antidumping law misc monopolizing dumping misc non-monopolizing dumping misc case study |
topic_browse |
ddc 330 misc antidumping law misc monopolizing dumping misc non-monopolizing dumping misc case study |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of industry, competition and trade |
hierarchy_parent_id |
340721324 |
dewey-tens |
330 - Economics 690 - Building & construction |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of industry, competition and trade |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)340721324 (DE-600)2067120-9 (DE-576)102476020 |
title |
Antidumping as Anticompetitive Practice Evidence from the United States and the European Union |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC207479441X (DE-He213)s10842-006-0026-y-p |
title_full |
Antidumping as Anticompetitive Practice Evidence from the United States and the European Union |
author_sort |
Jallab, Mustapha Sadni |
journal |
Journal of industry, competition and trade |
journalStr |
Journal of industry, competition and trade |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences 600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2006 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
253 |
author_browse |
Jallab, Mustapha Sadni Kobak, James B. |
container_volume |
6 |
class |
330 690 VZ |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Jallab, Mustapha Sadni |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10842-006-0026-y |
dewey-full |
330 690 |
title_sort |
antidumping as anticompetitive practice evidence from the united states and the european union |
title_auth |
Antidumping as Anticompetitive Practice Evidence from the United States and the European Union |
abstract |
Abstract This paper discusses and develops certain observable indices of the nature and effects of dumping and antidumping policy. The object is to analyze each antidumping procedure introduced by the United States (US) and the European Union (EU) for the 1998–2001 period. Using conservative criteria, we find that 68.2% of the antidumping procedures introduced by the EU appear to have a questionable economic foundation, meaning that the identified factors suggest that the conduct challenged is unlikely to have any significantly anticompetitive effect. We similarly find a questionable economic foundation in 76% of the analyzed cases in the US. The recommendation that we propose is that it may be appropriate to modify the antidumping law to take into account at a preliminary stage the factors that may indicate the presence or absence of potential anticompetitive effects. © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006 |
abstractGer |
Abstract This paper discusses and develops certain observable indices of the nature and effects of dumping and antidumping policy. The object is to analyze each antidumping procedure introduced by the United States (US) and the European Union (EU) for the 1998–2001 period. Using conservative criteria, we find that 68.2% of the antidumping procedures introduced by the EU appear to have a questionable economic foundation, meaning that the identified factors suggest that the conduct challenged is unlikely to have any significantly anticompetitive effect. We similarly find a questionable economic foundation in 76% of the analyzed cases in the US. The recommendation that we propose is that it may be appropriate to modify the antidumping law to take into account at a preliminary stage the factors that may indicate the presence or absence of potential anticompetitive effects. © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract This paper discusses and develops certain observable indices of the nature and effects of dumping and antidumping policy. The object is to analyze each antidumping procedure introduced by the United States (US) and the European Union (EU) for the 1998–2001 period. Using conservative criteria, we find that 68.2% of the antidumping procedures introduced by the EU appear to have a questionable economic foundation, meaning that the identified factors suggest that the conduct challenged is unlikely to have any significantly anticompetitive effect. We similarly find a questionable economic foundation in 76% of the analyzed cases in the US. The recommendation that we propose is that it may be appropriate to modify the antidumping law to take into account at a preliminary stage the factors that may indicate the presence or absence of potential anticompetitive effects. © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2012 |
container_issue |
3-4 |
title_short |
Antidumping as Anticompetitive Practice Evidence from the United States and the European Union |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-0026-y |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Kobak, James B. |
author2Str |
Kobak, James B. |
ppnlink |
340721324 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s10842-006-0026-y |
up_date |
2024-07-03T23:26:29.573Z |
_version_ |
1803602299006746624 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC207479441X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503115337.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2006 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10842-006-0026-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC207479441X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10842-006-0026-y-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jallab, Mustapha Sadni</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Antidumping as Anticompetitive Practice Evidence from the United States and the European Union</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This paper discusses and develops certain observable indices of the nature and effects of dumping and antidumping policy. The object is to analyze each antidumping procedure introduced by the United States (US) and the European Union (EU) for the 1998–2001 period. Using conservative criteria, we find that 68.2% of the antidumping procedures introduced by the EU appear to have a questionable economic foundation, meaning that the identified factors suggest that the conduct challenged is unlikely to have any significantly anticompetitive effect. We similarly find a questionable economic foundation in 76% of the analyzed cases in the US. The recommendation that we propose is that it may be appropriate to modify the antidumping law to take into account at a preliminary stage the factors that may indicate the presence or absence of potential anticompetitive effects.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">antidumping law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">monopolizing dumping</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">non-monopolizing dumping</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">case study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kobak, James B.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of industry, competition and trade</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">6(2006), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 253-275</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)340721324</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2067120-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)102476020</subfield><subfield code="x">1566-1679</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:6</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2006</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3-4</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:253-275</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-0026-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">6</subfield><subfield code="j">2006</subfield><subfield code="e">3-4</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">253-275</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399288 |