Co-witness Information Can Have Immediate Effects on Eyewitness Memory Reports
Abstract When questioning a reluctant witness, investigators sometimes encourage the witness by providing information about what other witnesses have said. Three experiments were conducted to test the combined effects of such co-witness information and suggestive questioning on the accuracy of eyewi...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Shaw III, John S. [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
1997 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Systematik: |
|
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Law and human behavior - Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers, 1977, 21(1997), 5 vom: Okt., Seite 503-523 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:21 ; year:1997 ; number:5 ; month:10 ; pages:503-523 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1023/A:1024875723399 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC2074804717 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2074804717 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230503170955.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 200820s1997 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1023/A:1024875723399 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2074804717 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)A:1024875723399-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 150 |a 340 |q VZ |
084 | |a 5,2 |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
084 | |a KRIM |q DE-21 |2 fid | ||
084 | |a PH 195 |q VZ |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a PH 195 |q VZ |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a 86.00 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Shaw III, John S. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Co-witness Information Can Have Immediate Effects on Eyewitness Memory Reports |
264 | 1 | |c 1997 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997 | ||
520 | |a Abstract When questioning a reluctant witness, investigators sometimes encourage the witness by providing information about what other witnesses have said. Three experiments were conducted to test the combined effects of such co-witness information and suggestive questioning on the accuracy of eyewitness memory reports. Experiment 1 was analogous to the experience of a witness who receives information from an interviewer or questioner about what other witnesses have already said, whereas Experiments 2 and 3 simulated the situation in which a witness receives information directly from a co-witness. In all three experiments, when participants received incorrect information about a co-witness's response, they were significantly more likely to give that incorrect response than if they received no co-witness information. This effect persevered in a delayed memory test 48 h after the initial questioning session in Experiment 3. Accuracy rates were lowest of all when incorrect co-witness information was paired with questioning that suggested an incorrect response. These results have implications not only for the immediate effects on the accuracy of witnesses' memory reports, but also for the impact that even one such inaccurate report can have on the manner in which a case is investigated by the police or other authorities. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Combine Effect | |
650 | 4 | |a Social Psychology | |
650 | 4 | |a Accuracy Rate | |
650 | 4 | |a Memory Test | |
650 | 4 | |a Incorrect Response | |
700 | 1 | |a Garven, Sena |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wood, James M. |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Law and human behavior |d Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers, 1977 |g 21(1997), 5 vom: Okt., Seite 503-523 |w (DE-627)166767484 |w (DE-600)303539-6 |w (DE-576)015207072 |x 0147-7307 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:1997 |g number:5 |g month:10 |g pages:503-523 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024875723399 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a FID-KRIM | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-JUR | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2041 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
936 | r | v | |a PH 195 |
936 | r | v | |a PH 195 |
936 | b | k | |a 86.00 |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 21 |j 1997 |e 5 |c 10 |h 503-523 |
author_variant |
i j s s ijs ijss s g sg j m w jm jmw |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:01477307:1997----::oinsifrainahvimdaefetoeei |
hierarchy_sort_str |
1997 |
bklnumber |
86.00 |
publishDate |
1997 |
allfields |
10.1023/A:1024875723399 doi (DE-627)OLC2074804717 (DE-He213)A:1024875723399-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 340 VZ 5,2 2,1 ssgn KRIM DE-21 fid PH 195 VZ rvk PH 195 VZ rvk 86.00 bkl Shaw III, John S. verfasserin aut Co-witness Information Can Have Immediate Effects on Eyewitness Memory Reports 1997 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997 Abstract When questioning a reluctant witness, investigators sometimes encourage the witness by providing information about what other witnesses have said. Three experiments were conducted to test the combined effects of such co-witness information and suggestive questioning on the accuracy of eyewitness memory reports. Experiment 1 was analogous to the experience of a witness who receives information from an interviewer or questioner about what other witnesses have already said, whereas Experiments 2 and 3 simulated the situation in which a witness receives information directly from a co-witness. In all three experiments, when participants received incorrect information about a co-witness's response, they were significantly more likely to give that incorrect response than if they received no co-witness information. This effect persevered in a delayed memory test 48 h after the initial questioning session in Experiment 3. Accuracy rates were lowest of all when incorrect co-witness information was paired with questioning that suggested an incorrect response. These results have implications not only for the immediate effects on the accuracy of witnesses' memory reports, but also for the impact that even one such inaccurate report can have on the manner in which a case is investigated by the police or other authorities. Combine Effect Social Psychology Accuracy Rate Memory Test Incorrect Response Garven, Sena aut Wood, James M. aut Enthalten in Law and human behavior Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers, 1977 21(1997), 5 vom: Okt., Seite 503-523 (DE-627)166767484 (DE-600)303539-6 (DE-576)015207072 0147-7307 nnns volume:21 year:1997 number:5 month:10 pages:503-523 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024875723399 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-KRIM SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4112 PH 195 PH 195 86.00 VZ AR 21 1997 5 10 503-523 |
spelling |
10.1023/A:1024875723399 doi (DE-627)OLC2074804717 (DE-He213)A:1024875723399-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 340 VZ 5,2 2,1 ssgn KRIM DE-21 fid PH 195 VZ rvk PH 195 VZ rvk 86.00 bkl Shaw III, John S. verfasserin aut Co-witness Information Can Have Immediate Effects on Eyewitness Memory Reports 1997 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997 Abstract When questioning a reluctant witness, investigators sometimes encourage the witness by providing information about what other witnesses have said. Three experiments were conducted to test the combined effects of such co-witness information and suggestive questioning on the accuracy of eyewitness memory reports. Experiment 1 was analogous to the experience of a witness who receives information from an interviewer or questioner about what other witnesses have already said, whereas Experiments 2 and 3 simulated the situation in which a witness receives information directly from a co-witness. In all three experiments, when participants received incorrect information about a co-witness's response, they were significantly more likely to give that incorrect response than if they received no co-witness information. This effect persevered in a delayed memory test 48 h after the initial questioning session in Experiment 3. Accuracy rates were lowest of all when incorrect co-witness information was paired with questioning that suggested an incorrect response. These results have implications not only for the immediate effects on the accuracy of witnesses' memory reports, but also for the impact that even one such inaccurate report can have on the manner in which a case is investigated by the police or other authorities. Combine Effect Social Psychology Accuracy Rate Memory Test Incorrect Response Garven, Sena aut Wood, James M. aut Enthalten in Law and human behavior Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers, 1977 21(1997), 5 vom: Okt., Seite 503-523 (DE-627)166767484 (DE-600)303539-6 (DE-576)015207072 0147-7307 nnns volume:21 year:1997 number:5 month:10 pages:503-523 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024875723399 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-KRIM SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4112 PH 195 PH 195 86.00 VZ AR 21 1997 5 10 503-523 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1023/A:1024875723399 doi (DE-627)OLC2074804717 (DE-He213)A:1024875723399-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 340 VZ 5,2 2,1 ssgn KRIM DE-21 fid PH 195 VZ rvk PH 195 VZ rvk 86.00 bkl Shaw III, John S. verfasserin aut Co-witness Information Can Have Immediate Effects on Eyewitness Memory Reports 1997 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997 Abstract When questioning a reluctant witness, investigators sometimes encourage the witness by providing information about what other witnesses have said. Three experiments were conducted to test the combined effects of such co-witness information and suggestive questioning on the accuracy of eyewitness memory reports. Experiment 1 was analogous to the experience of a witness who receives information from an interviewer or questioner about what other witnesses have already said, whereas Experiments 2 and 3 simulated the situation in which a witness receives information directly from a co-witness. In all three experiments, when participants received incorrect information about a co-witness's response, they were significantly more likely to give that incorrect response than if they received no co-witness information. This effect persevered in a delayed memory test 48 h after the initial questioning session in Experiment 3. Accuracy rates were lowest of all when incorrect co-witness information was paired with questioning that suggested an incorrect response. These results have implications not only for the immediate effects on the accuracy of witnesses' memory reports, but also for the impact that even one such inaccurate report can have on the manner in which a case is investigated by the police or other authorities. Combine Effect Social Psychology Accuracy Rate Memory Test Incorrect Response Garven, Sena aut Wood, James M. aut Enthalten in Law and human behavior Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers, 1977 21(1997), 5 vom: Okt., Seite 503-523 (DE-627)166767484 (DE-600)303539-6 (DE-576)015207072 0147-7307 nnns volume:21 year:1997 number:5 month:10 pages:503-523 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024875723399 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-KRIM SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4112 PH 195 PH 195 86.00 VZ AR 21 1997 5 10 503-523 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1023/A:1024875723399 doi (DE-627)OLC2074804717 (DE-He213)A:1024875723399-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 340 VZ 5,2 2,1 ssgn KRIM DE-21 fid PH 195 VZ rvk PH 195 VZ rvk 86.00 bkl Shaw III, John S. verfasserin aut Co-witness Information Can Have Immediate Effects on Eyewitness Memory Reports 1997 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997 Abstract When questioning a reluctant witness, investigators sometimes encourage the witness by providing information about what other witnesses have said. Three experiments were conducted to test the combined effects of such co-witness information and suggestive questioning on the accuracy of eyewitness memory reports. Experiment 1 was analogous to the experience of a witness who receives information from an interviewer or questioner about what other witnesses have already said, whereas Experiments 2 and 3 simulated the situation in which a witness receives information directly from a co-witness. In all three experiments, when participants received incorrect information about a co-witness's response, they were significantly more likely to give that incorrect response than if they received no co-witness information. This effect persevered in a delayed memory test 48 h after the initial questioning session in Experiment 3. Accuracy rates were lowest of all when incorrect co-witness information was paired with questioning that suggested an incorrect response. These results have implications not only for the immediate effects on the accuracy of witnesses' memory reports, but also for the impact that even one such inaccurate report can have on the manner in which a case is investigated by the police or other authorities. Combine Effect Social Psychology Accuracy Rate Memory Test Incorrect Response Garven, Sena aut Wood, James M. aut Enthalten in Law and human behavior Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers, 1977 21(1997), 5 vom: Okt., Seite 503-523 (DE-627)166767484 (DE-600)303539-6 (DE-576)015207072 0147-7307 nnns volume:21 year:1997 number:5 month:10 pages:503-523 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024875723399 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-KRIM SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4112 PH 195 PH 195 86.00 VZ AR 21 1997 5 10 503-523 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1023/A:1024875723399 doi (DE-627)OLC2074804717 (DE-He213)A:1024875723399-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 340 VZ 5,2 2,1 ssgn KRIM DE-21 fid PH 195 VZ rvk PH 195 VZ rvk 86.00 bkl Shaw III, John S. verfasserin aut Co-witness Information Can Have Immediate Effects on Eyewitness Memory Reports 1997 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997 Abstract When questioning a reluctant witness, investigators sometimes encourage the witness by providing information about what other witnesses have said. Three experiments were conducted to test the combined effects of such co-witness information and suggestive questioning on the accuracy of eyewitness memory reports. Experiment 1 was analogous to the experience of a witness who receives information from an interviewer or questioner about what other witnesses have already said, whereas Experiments 2 and 3 simulated the situation in which a witness receives information directly from a co-witness. In all three experiments, when participants received incorrect information about a co-witness's response, they were significantly more likely to give that incorrect response than if they received no co-witness information. This effect persevered in a delayed memory test 48 h after the initial questioning session in Experiment 3. Accuracy rates were lowest of all when incorrect co-witness information was paired with questioning that suggested an incorrect response. These results have implications not only for the immediate effects on the accuracy of witnesses' memory reports, but also for the impact that even one such inaccurate report can have on the manner in which a case is investigated by the police or other authorities. Combine Effect Social Psychology Accuracy Rate Memory Test Incorrect Response Garven, Sena aut Wood, James M. aut Enthalten in Law and human behavior Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers, 1977 21(1997), 5 vom: Okt., Seite 503-523 (DE-627)166767484 (DE-600)303539-6 (DE-576)015207072 0147-7307 nnns volume:21 year:1997 number:5 month:10 pages:503-523 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024875723399 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-KRIM SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4112 PH 195 PH 195 86.00 VZ AR 21 1997 5 10 503-523 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Law and human behavior 21(1997), 5 vom: Okt., Seite 503-523 volume:21 year:1997 number:5 month:10 pages:503-523 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Law and human behavior 21(1997), 5 vom: Okt., Seite 503-523 volume:21 year:1997 number:5 month:10 pages:503-523 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Combine Effect Social Psychology Accuracy Rate Memory Test Incorrect Response |
dewey-raw |
150 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Law and human behavior |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Shaw III, John S. @@aut@@ Garven, Sena @@aut@@ Wood, James M. @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
1997-10-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
166767484 |
dewey-sort |
3150 |
id |
OLC2074804717 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2074804717</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503170955.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s1997 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1023/A:1024875723399</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2074804717</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)A:1024875723399-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,2</subfield><subfield code="a">2,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">KRIM</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-21</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PH 195</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PH 195</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shaw III, John S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Co-witness Information Can Have Immediate Effects on Eyewitness Memory Reports</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1997</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract When questioning a reluctant witness, investigators sometimes encourage the witness by providing information about what other witnesses have said. Three experiments were conducted to test the combined effects of such co-witness information and suggestive questioning on the accuracy of eyewitness memory reports. Experiment 1 was analogous to the experience of a witness who receives information from an interviewer or questioner about what other witnesses have already said, whereas Experiments 2 and 3 simulated the situation in which a witness receives information directly from a co-witness. In all three experiments, when participants received incorrect information about a co-witness's response, they were significantly more likely to give that incorrect response than if they received no co-witness information. This effect persevered in a delayed memory test 48 h after the initial questioning session in Experiment 3. Accuracy rates were lowest of all when incorrect co-witness information was paired with questioning that suggested an incorrect response. These results have implications not only for the immediate effects on the accuracy of witnesses' memory reports, but also for the impact that even one such inaccurate report can have on the manner in which a case is investigated by the police or other authorities.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Combine Effect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social Psychology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Accuracy Rate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Memory Test</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Incorrect Response</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Garven, Sena</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wood, James M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Law and human behavior</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers, 1977</subfield><subfield code="g">21(1997), 5 vom: Okt., Seite 503-523</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)166767484</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)303539-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015207072</subfield><subfield code="x">0147-7307</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:21</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1997</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:503-523</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024875723399</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-KRIM</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="r" ind2="v"><subfield code="a">PH 195</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="r" ind2="v"><subfield code="a">PH 195</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">21</subfield><subfield code="j">1997</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">503-523</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Shaw III, John S. |
spellingShingle |
Shaw III, John S. ddc 150 ssgn 5,2 fid KRIM rvk PH 195 bkl 86.00 misc Combine Effect misc Social Psychology misc Accuracy Rate misc Memory Test misc Incorrect Response Co-witness Information Can Have Immediate Effects on Eyewitness Memory Reports |
authorStr |
Shaw III, John S. |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)166767484 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
150 - Psychology 340 - Law |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0147-7307 |
topic_title |
150 340 VZ 5,2 2,1 ssgn KRIM DE-21 fid PH 195 VZ rvk 86.00 bkl Co-witness Information Can Have Immediate Effects on Eyewitness Memory Reports Combine Effect Social Psychology Accuracy Rate Memory Test Incorrect Response |
topic |
ddc 150 ssgn 5,2 fid KRIM rvk PH 195 bkl 86.00 misc Combine Effect misc Social Psychology misc Accuracy Rate misc Memory Test misc Incorrect Response |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 150 ssgn 5,2 fid KRIM rvk PH 195 bkl 86.00 misc Combine Effect misc Social Psychology misc Accuracy Rate misc Memory Test misc Incorrect Response |
topic_browse |
ddc 150 ssgn 5,2 fid KRIM rvk PH 195 bkl 86.00 misc Combine Effect misc Social Psychology misc Accuracy Rate misc Memory Test misc Incorrect Response |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Law and human behavior |
hierarchy_parent_id |
166767484 |
dewey-tens |
150 - Psychology 340 - Law |
hierarchy_top_title |
Law and human behavior |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)166767484 (DE-600)303539-6 (DE-576)015207072 |
title |
Co-witness Information Can Have Immediate Effects on Eyewitness Memory Reports |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2074804717 (DE-He213)A:1024875723399-p |
title_full |
Co-witness Information Can Have Immediate Effects on Eyewitness Memory Reports |
author_sort |
Shaw III, John S. |
journal |
Law and human behavior |
journalStr |
Law and human behavior |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
100 - Philosophy & psychology 300 - Social sciences |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
1997 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
503 |
author_browse |
Shaw III, John S. Garven, Sena Wood, James M. |
container_volume |
21 |
class |
150 340 VZ 5,2 2,1 ssgn KRIM DE-21 fid PH 195 VZ rvk 86.00 bkl |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Shaw III, John S. |
doi_str_mv |
10.1023/A:1024875723399 |
dewey-full |
150 340 |
title_sort |
co-witness information can have immediate effects on eyewitness memory reports |
title_auth |
Co-witness Information Can Have Immediate Effects on Eyewitness Memory Reports |
abstract |
Abstract When questioning a reluctant witness, investigators sometimes encourage the witness by providing information about what other witnesses have said. Three experiments were conducted to test the combined effects of such co-witness information and suggestive questioning on the accuracy of eyewitness memory reports. Experiment 1 was analogous to the experience of a witness who receives information from an interviewer or questioner about what other witnesses have already said, whereas Experiments 2 and 3 simulated the situation in which a witness receives information directly from a co-witness. In all three experiments, when participants received incorrect information about a co-witness's response, they were significantly more likely to give that incorrect response than if they received no co-witness information. This effect persevered in a delayed memory test 48 h after the initial questioning session in Experiment 3. Accuracy rates were lowest of all when incorrect co-witness information was paired with questioning that suggested an incorrect response. These results have implications not only for the immediate effects on the accuracy of witnesses' memory reports, but also for the impact that even one such inaccurate report can have on the manner in which a case is investigated by the police or other authorities. © Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997 |
abstractGer |
Abstract When questioning a reluctant witness, investigators sometimes encourage the witness by providing information about what other witnesses have said. Three experiments were conducted to test the combined effects of such co-witness information and suggestive questioning on the accuracy of eyewitness memory reports. Experiment 1 was analogous to the experience of a witness who receives information from an interviewer or questioner about what other witnesses have already said, whereas Experiments 2 and 3 simulated the situation in which a witness receives information directly from a co-witness. In all three experiments, when participants received incorrect information about a co-witness's response, they were significantly more likely to give that incorrect response than if they received no co-witness information. This effect persevered in a delayed memory test 48 h after the initial questioning session in Experiment 3. Accuracy rates were lowest of all when incorrect co-witness information was paired with questioning that suggested an incorrect response. These results have implications not only for the immediate effects on the accuracy of witnesses' memory reports, but also for the impact that even one such inaccurate report can have on the manner in which a case is investigated by the police or other authorities. © Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract When questioning a reluctant witness, investigators sometimes encourage the witness by providing information about what other witnesses have said. Three experiments were conducted to test the combined effects of such co-witness information and suggestive questioning on the accuracy of eyewitness memory reports. Experiment 1 was analogous to the experience of a witness who receives information from an interviewer or questioner about what other witnesses have already said, whereas Experiments 2 and 3 simulated the situation in which a witness receives information directly from a co-witness. In all three experiments, when participants received incorrect information about a co-witness's response, they were significantly more likely to give that incorrect response than if they received no co-witness information. This effect persevered in a delayed memory test 48 h after the initial questioning session in Experiment 3. Accuracy rates were lowest of all when incorrect co-witness information was paired with questioning that suggested an incorrect response. These results have implications not only for the immediate effects on the accuracy of witnesses' memory reports, but also for the impact that even one such inaccurate report can have on the manner in which a case is investigated by the police or other authorities. © Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-KRIM SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4112 |
container_issue |
5 |
title_short |
Co-witness Information Can Have Immediate Effects on Eyewitness Memory Reports |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024875723399 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Garven, Sena Wood, James M. |
author2Str |
Garven, Sena Wood, James M. |
ppnlink |
166767484 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1023/A:1024875723399 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T23:28:26.024Z |
_version_ |
1803602421115518976 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2074804717</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503170955.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s1997 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1023/A:1024875723399</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2074804717</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)A:1024875723399-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,2</subfield><subfield code="a">2,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">KRIM</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-21</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PH 195</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PH 195</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shaw III, John S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Co-witness Information Can Have Immediate Effects on Eyewitness Memory Reports</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1997</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract When questioning a reluctant witness, investigators sometimes encourage the witness by providing information about what other witnesses have said. Three experiments were conducted to test the combined effects of such co-witness information and suggestive questioning on the accuracy of eyewitness memory reports. Experiment 1 was analogous to the experience of a witness who receives information from an interviewer or questioner about what other witnesses have already said, whereas Experiments 2 and 3 simulated the situation in which a witness receives information directly from a co-witness. In all three experiments, when participants received incorrect information about a co-witness's response, they were significantly more likely to give that incorrect response than if they received no co-witness information. This effect persevered in a delayed memory test 48 h after the initial questioning session in Experiment 3. Accuracy rates were lowest of all when incorrect co-witness information was paired with questioning that suggested an incorrect response. These results have implications not only for the immediate effects on the accuracy of witnesses' memory reports, but also for the impact that even one such inaccurate report can have on the manner in which a case is investigated by the police or other authorities.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Combine Effect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social Psychology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Accuracy Rate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Memory Test</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Incorrect Response</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Garven, Sena</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wood, James M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Law and human behavior</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers, 1977</subfield><subfield code="g">21(1997), 5 vom: Okt., Seite 503-523</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)166767484</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)303539-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015207072</subfield><subfield code="x">0147-7307</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:21</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1997</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:503-523</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024875723399</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-KRIM</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="r" ind2="v"><subfield code="a">PH 195</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="r" ind2="v"><subfield code="a">PH 195</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">21</subfield><subfield code="j">1997</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">503-523</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4018974 |