Relating tradable credits for biodiversity to sustainability criteria in a dynamic landscape
Abstract Tradable biodiversity credit systems provide flexible means to resolve conflicts between development and conservation land-use options for habitats occupied by threatened or endangered species. We describe an approach to incorporate the influence of habitat fragmentation into the conservati...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Bruggeman, Douglas J. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2009 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Landscape ecology - Springer Netherlands, 1987, 24(2009), 6 vom: 07. Mai, Seite 775-790 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:24 ; year:2009 ; number:6 ; day:07 ; month:05 ; pages:775-790 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10980-009-9351-y |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2075226776 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2075226776 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503171127.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200820s2009 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10980-009-9351-y |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2075226776 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10980-009-9351-y-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |a 910 |a 630 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 12 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a BIODIV |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bruggeman, Douglas J. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Relating tradable credits for biodiversity to sustainability criteria in a dynamic landscape |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Tradable biodiversity credit systems provide flexible means to resolve conflicts between development and conservation land-use options for habitats occupied by threatened or endangered species. We describe an approach to incorporate the influence of habitat fragmentation into the conservation value of tradable credits. Habitat fragmentation decreases gene flow, increases rates of genetic drift and inbreeding, and increases probabilities of patch extinction. Importantly, tradable credit systems will change the level of fragmentation over time for small and/or declining populations. We apply landscape equivalency analysis (LEA), a generalizable, landscape-scale accounting system that assigns conservation value to habitat patches based on patch contributions to abundance and genetic variance at landscape scales. By evaluating habitat trades using two models that vary the relationship between dispersal behaviors and landscape patterns, we show that LEA provides a novel method for limiting access to habitat at the landscape-scale, recognizing that the appropriate amount of migration needed to supplement patch recruitment and to offset drift and inbreeding will vary as landscape pattern changes over time. We also found that decisions based on probabilities of persistence alone would ignore changes in migration, genetic drift, and patch extinction that result from habitat trades. The general principle of LEA is that habitat patches traded should make at least equivalent contributions to rates of recruitment and migration estimated at a landscape scale. Traditional approaches for assessing the “take” and “jeopardy” standards under the Endangered Species Act based on changes in abundance and probability of persistence may be inadequate to prevent trades that increase fragmentation. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Tradable credits | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Endangered Species Act | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Habitat fragmentation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Extinction risk | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Landscape genetics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Landscape equivalency analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ecosystem services | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Red cockaded woodpeckers | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Gene flow | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Genetic drift | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jones, Michael L. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Scribner, Kim |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lupi, Frank |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Landscape ecology |d Springer Netherlands, 1987 |g 24(2009), 6 vom: 07. Mai, Seite 775-790 |w (DE-627)130857424 |w (DE-600)1027798-5 |w (DE-576)052841901 |x 0921-2973 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2009 |g number:6 |g day:07 |g month:05 |g pages:775-790 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9351-y |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-ARC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-FOR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4082 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4219 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 24 |j 2009 |e 6 |b 07 |c 05 |h 775-790 | ||
| author_variant |
d j b dj djb m l j ml mlj k s ks f l fl |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:09212973:2009----::eaigrdberdtfridvriyoutiaiiyrtr |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2009 |
| publishDate |
2009 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10980-009-9351-y doi (DE-627)OLC2075226776 (DE-He213)s10980-009-9351-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 910 630 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Bruggeman, Douglas J. verfasserin aut Relating tradable credits for biodiversity to sustainability criteria in a dynamic landscape 2009 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Tradable biodiversity credit systems provide flexible means to resolve conflicts between development and conservation land-use options for habitats occupied by threatened or endangered species. We describe an approach to incorporate the influence of habitat fragmentation into the conservation value of tradable credits. Habitat fragmentation decreases gene flow, increases rates of genetic drift and inbreeding, and increases probabilities of patch extinction. Importantly, tradable credit systems will change the level of fragmentation over time for small and/or declining populations. We apply landscape equivalency analysis (LEA), a generalizable, landscape-scale accounting system that assigns conservation value to habitat patches based on patch contributions to abundance and genetic variance at landscape scales. By evaluating habitat trades using two models that vary the relationship between dispersal behaviors and landscape patterns, we show that LEA provides a novel method for limiting access to habitat at the landscape-scale, recognizing that the appropriate amount of migration needed to supplement patch recruitment and to offset drift and inbreeding will vary as landscape pattern changes over time. We also found that decisions based on probabilities of persistence alone would ignore changes in migration, genetic drift, and patch extinction that result from habitat trades. The general principle of LEA is that habitat patches traded should make at least equivalent contributions to rates of recruitment and migration estimated at a landscape scale. Traditional approaches for assessing the “take” and “jeopardy” standards under the Endangered Species Act based on changes in abundance and probability of persistence may be inadequate to prevent trades that increase fragmentation. Tradable credits Endangered Species Act Habitat fragmentation Extinction risk Landscape genetics Landscape equivalency analysis Ecosystem services Red cockaded woodpeckers Gene flow Genetic drift Jones, Michael L. aut Scribner, Kim aut Lupi, Frank aut Enthalten in Landscape ecology Springer Netherlands, 1987 24(2009), 6 vom: 07. Mai, Seite 775-790 (DE-627)130857424 (DE-600)1027798-5 (DE-576)052841901 0921-2973 nnns volume:24 year:2009 number:6 day:07 month:05 pages:775-790 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9351-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4219 AR 24 2009 6 07 05 775-790 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10980-009-9351-y doi (DE-627)OLC2075226776 (DE-He213)s10980-009-9351-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 910 630 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Bruggeman, Douglas J. verfasserin aut Relating tradable credits for biodiversity to sustainability criteria in a dynamic landscape 2009 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Tradable biodiversity credit systems provide flexible means to resolve conflicts between development and conservation land-use options for habitats occupied by threatened or endangered species. We describe an approach to incorporate the influence of habitat fragmentation into the conservation value of tradable credits. Habitat fragmentation decreases gene flow, increases rates of genetic drift and inbreeding, and increases probabilities of patch extinction. Importantly, tradable credit systems will change the level of fragmentation over time for small and/or declining populations. We apply landscape equivalency analysis (LEA), a generalizable, landscape-scale accounting system that assigns conservation value to habitat patches based on patch contributions to abundance and genetic variance at landscape scales. By evaluating habitat trades using two models that vary the relationship between dispersal behaviors and landscape patterns, we show that LEA provides a novel method for limiting access to habitat at the landscape-scale, recognizing that the appropriate amount of migration needed to supplement patch recruitment and to offset drift and inbreeding will vary as landscape pattern changes over time. We also found that decisions based on probabilities of persistence alone would ignore changes in migration, genetic drift, and patch extinction that result from habitat trades. The general principle of LEA is that habitat patches traded should make at least equivalent contributions to rates of recruitment and migration estimated at a landscape scale. Traditional approaches for assessing the “take” and “jeopardy” standards under the Endangered Species Act based on changes in abundance and probability of persistence may be inadequate to prevent trades that increase fragmentation. Tradable credits Endangered Species Act Habitat fragmentation Extinction risk Landscape genetics Landscape equivalency analysis Ecosystem services Red cockaded woodpeckers Gene flow Genetic drift Jones, Michael L. aut Scribner, Kim aut Lupi, Frank aut Enthalten in Landscape ecology Springer Netherlands, 1987 24(2009), 6 vom: 07. Mai, Seite 775-790 (DE-627)130857424 (DE-600)1027798-5 (DE-576)052841901 0921-2973 nnns volume:24 year:2009 number:6 day:07 month:05 pages:775-790 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9351-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4219 AR 24 2009 6 07 05 775-790 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10980-009-9351-y doi (DE-627)OLC2075226776 (DE-He213)s10980-009-9351-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 910 630 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Bruggeman, Douglas J. verfasserin aut Relating tradable credits for biodiversity to sustainability criteria in a dynamic landscape 2009 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Tradable biodiversity credit systems provide flexible means to resolve conflicts between development and conservation land-use options for habitats occupied by threatened or endangered species. We describe an approach to incorporate the influence of habitat fragmentation into the conservation value of tradable credits. Habitat fragmentation decreases gene flow, increases rates of genetic drift and inbreeding, and increases probabilities of patch extinction. Importantly, tradable credit systems will change the level of fragmentation over time for small and/or declining populations. We apply landscape equivalency analysis (LEA), a generalizable, landscape-scale accounting system that assigns conservation value to habitat patches based on patch contributions to abundance and genetic variance at landscape scales. By evaluating habitat trades using two models that vary the relationship between dispersal behaviors and landscape patterns, we show that LEA provides a novel method for limiting access to habitat at the landscape-scale, recognizing that the appropriate amount of migration needed to supplement patch recruitment and to offset drift and inbreeding will vary as landscape pattern changes over time. We also found that decisions based on probabilities of persistence alone would ignore changes in migration, genetic drift, and patch extinction that result from habitat trades. The general principle of LEA is that habitat patches traded should make at least equivalent contributions to rates of recruitment and migration estimated at a landscape scale. Traditional approaches for assessing the “take” and “jeopardy” standards under the Endangered Species Act based on changes in abundance and probability of persistence may be inadequate to prevent trades that increase fragmentation. Tradable credits Endangered Species Act Habitat fragmentation Extinction risk Landscape genetics Landscape equivalency analysis Ecosystem services Red cockaded woodpeckers Gene flow Genetic drift Jones, Michael L. aut Scribner, Kim aut Lupi, Frank aut Enthalten in Landscape ecology Springer Netherlands, 1987 24(2009), 6 vom: 07. Mai, Seite 775-790 (DE-627)130857424 (DE-600)1027798-5 (DE-576)052841901 0921-2973 nnns volume:24 year:2009 number:6 day:07 month:05 pages:775-790 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9351-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4219 AR 24 2009 6 07 05 775-790 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10980-009-9351-y doi (DE-627)OLC2075226776 (DE-He213)s10980-009-9351-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 910 630 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Bruggeman, Douglas J. verfasserin aut Relating tradable credits for biodiversity to sustainability criteria in a dynamic landscape 2009 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Tradable biodiversity credit systems provide flexible means to resolve conflicts between development and conservation land-use options for habitats occupied by threatened or endangered species. We describe an approach to incorporate the influence of habitat fragmentation into the conservation value of tradable credits. Habitat fragmentation decreases gene flow, increases rates of genetic drift and inbreeding, and increases probabilities of patch extinction. Importantly, tradable credit systems will change the level of fragmentation over time for small and/or declining populations. We apply landscape equivalency analysis (LEA), a generalizable, landscape-scale accounting system that assigns conservation value to habitat patches based on patch contributions to abundance and genetic variance at landscape scales. By evaluating habitat trades using two models that vary the relationship between dispersal behaviors and landscape patterns, we show that LEA provides a novel method for limiting access to habitat at the landscape-scale, recognizing that the appropriate amount of migration needed to supplement patch recruitment and to offset drift and inbreeding will vary as landscape pattern changes over time. We also found that decisions based on probabilities of persistence alone would ignore changes in migration, genetic drift, and patch extinction that result from habitat trades. The general principle of LEA is that habitat patches traded should make at least equivalent contributions to rates of recruitment and migration estimated at a landscape scale. Traditional approaches for assessing the “take” and “jeopardy” standards under the Endangered Species Act based on changes in abundance and probability of persistence may be inadequate to prevent trades that increase fragmentation. Tradable credits Endangered Species Act Habitat fragmentation Extinction risk Landscape genetics Landscape equivalency analysis Ecosystem services Red cockaded woodpeckers Gene flow Genetic drift Jones, Michael L. aut Scribner, Kim aut Lupi, Frank aut Enthalten in Landscape ecology Springer Netherlands, 1987 24(2009), 6 vom: 07. Mai, Seite 775-790 (DE-627)130857424 (DE-600)1027798-5 (DE-576)052841901 0921-2973 nnns volume:24 year:2009 number:6 day:07 month:05 pages:775-790 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9351-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4219 AR 24 2009 6 07 05 775-790 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10980-009-9351-y doi (DE-627)OLC2075226776 (DE-He213)s10980-009-9351-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 910 630 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Bruggeman, Douglas J. verfasserin aut Relating tradable credits for biodiversity to sustainability criteria in a dynamic landscape 2009 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Tradable biodiversity credit systems provide flexible means to resolve conflicts between development and conservation land-use options for habitats occupied by threatened or endangered species. We describe an approach to incorporate the influence of habitat fragmentation into the conservation value of tradable credits. Habitat fragmentation decreases gene flow, increases rates of genetic drift and inbreeding, and increases probabilities of patch extinction. Importantly, tradable credit systems will change the level of fragmentation over time for small and/or declining populations. We apply landscape equivalency analysis (LEA), a generalizable, landscape-scale accounting system that assigns conservation value to habitat patches based on patch contributions to abundance and genetic variance at landscape scales. By evaluating habitat trades using two models that vary the relationship between dispersal behaviors and landscape patterns, we show that LEA provides a novel method for limiting access to habitat at the landscape-scale, recognizing that the appropriate amount of migration needed to supplement patch recruitment and to offset drift and inbreeding will vary as landscape pattern changes over time. We also found that decisions based on probabilities of persistence alone would ignore changes in migration, genetic drift, and patch extinction that result from habitat trades. The general principle of LEA is that habitat patches traded should make at least equivalent contributions to rates of recruitment and migration estimated at a landscape scale. Traditional approaches for assessing the “take” and “jeopardy” standards under the Endangered Species Act based on changes in abundance and probability of persistence may be inadequate to prevent trades that increase fragmentation. Tradable credits Endangered Species Act Habitat fragmentation Extinction risk Landscape genetics Landscape equivalency analysis Ecosystem services Red cockaded woodpeckers Gene flow Genetic drift Jones, Michael L. aut Scribner, Kim aut Lupi, Frank aut Enthalten in Landscape ecology Springer Netherlands, 1987 24(2009), 6 vom: 07. Mai, Seite 775-790 (DE-627)130857424 (DE-600)1027798-5 (DE-576)052841901 0921-2973 nnns volume:24 year:2009 number:6 day:07 month:05 pages:775-790 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9351-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4219 AR 24 2009 6 07 05 775-790 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Landscape ecology 24(2009), 6 vom: 07. Mai, Seite 775-790 volume:24 year:2009 number:6 day:07 month:05 pages:775-790 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Landscape ecology 24(2009), 6 vom: 07. Mai, Seite 775-790 volume:24 year:2009 number:6 day:07 month:05 pages:775-790 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Tradable credits Endangered Species Act Habitat fragmentation Extinction risk Landscape genetics Landscape equivalency analysis Ecosystem services Red cockaded woodpeckers Gene flow Genetic drift |
| dewey-raw |
570 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Landscape ecology |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Bruggeman, Douglas J. @@aut@@ Jones, Michael L. @@aut@@ Scribner, Kim @@aut@@ Lupi, Frank @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2009-05-07T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
130857424 |
| dewey-sort |
3570 |
| id |
OLC2075226776 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2075226776</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503171127.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2009 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10980-009-9351-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2075226776</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10980-009-9351-y-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">910</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bruggeman, Douglas J.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Relating tradable credits for biodiversity to sustainability criteria in a dynamic landscape</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Tradable biodiversity credit systems provide flexible means to resolve conflicts between development and conservation land-use options for habitats occupied by threatened or endangered species. We describe an approach to incorporate the influence of habitat fragmentation into the conservation value of tradable credits. Habitat fragmentation decreases gene flow, increases rates of genetic drift and inbreeding, and increases probabilities of patch extinction. Importantly, tradable credit systems will change the level of fragmentation over time for small and/or declining populations. We apply landscape equivalency analysis (LEA), a generalizable, landscape-scale accounting system that assigns conservation value to habitat patches based on patch contributions to abundance and genetic variance at landscape scales. By evaluating habitat trades using two models that vary the relationship between dispersal behaviors and landscape patterns, we show that LEA provides a novel method for limiting access to habitat at the landscape-scale, recognizing that the appropriate amount of migration needed to supplement patch recruitment and to offset drift and inbreeding will vary as landscape pattern changes over time. We also found that decisions based on probabilities of persistence alone would ignore changes in migration, genetic drift, and patch extinction that result from habitat trades. The general principle of LEA is that habitat patches traded should make at least equivalent contributions to rates of recruitment and migration estimated at a landscape scale. Traditional approaches for assessing the “take” and “jeopardy” standards under the Endangered Species Act based on changes in abundance and probability of persistence may be inadequate to prevent trades that increase fragmentation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tradable credits</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Endangered Species Act</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Habitat fragmentation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Extinction risk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Landscape genetics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Landscape equivalency analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ecosystem services</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Red cockaded woodpeckers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gene flow</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Genetic drift</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jones, Michael L.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Scribner, Kim</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lupi, Frank</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Landscape ecology</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1987</subfield><subfield code="g">24(2009), 6 vom: 07. Mai, Seite 775-790</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130857424</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1027798-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)052841901</subfield><subfield code="x">0921-2973</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2009</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:07</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:775-790</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9351-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">2009</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="b">07</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">775-790</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Bruggeman, Douglas J. |
| spellingShingle |
Bruggeman, Douglas J. ddc 570 ssgn 12 fid BIODIV misc Tradable credits misc Endangered Species Act misc Habitat fragmentation misc Extinction risk misc Landscape genetics misc Landscape equivalency analysis misc Ecosystem services misc Red cockaded woodpeckers misc Gene flow misc Genetic drift Relating tradable credits for biodiversity to sustainability criteria in a dynamic landscape |
| authorStr |
Bruggeman, Douglas J. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130857424 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
570 - Life sciences; biology 910 - Geography & travel 630 - Agriculture & related technologies |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0921-2973 |
| topic_title |
570 910 630 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Relating tradable credits for biodiversity to sustainability criteria in a dynamic landscape Tradable credits Endangered Species Act Habitat fragmentation Extinction risk Landscape genetics Landscape equivalency analysis Ecosystem services Red cockaded woodpeckers Gene flow Genetic drift |
| topic |
ddc 570 ssgn 12 fid BIODIV misc Tradable credits misc Endangered Species Act misc Habitat fragmentation misc Extinction risk misc Landscape genetics misc Landscape equivalency analysis misc Ecosystem services misc Red cockaded woodpeckers misc Gene flow misc Genetic drift |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 570 ssgn 12 fid BIODIV misc Tradable credits misc Endangered Species Act misc Habitat fragmentation misc Extinction risk misc Landscape genetics misc Landscape equivalency analysis misc Ecosystem services misc Red cockaded woodpeckers misc Gene flow misc Genetic drift |
| topic_browse |
ddc 570 ssgn 12 fid BIODIV misc Tradable credits misc Endangered Species Act misc Habitat fragmentation misc Extinction risk misc Landscape genetics misc Landscape equivalency analysis misc Ecosystem services misc Red cockaded woodpeckers misc Gene flow misc Genetic drift |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Landscape ecology |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
130857424 |
| dewey-tens |
570 - Life sciences; biology 910 - Geography & travel 630 - Agriculture |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Landscape ecology |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130857424 (DE-600)1027798-5 (DE-576)052841901 |
| title |
Relating tradable credits for biodiversity to sustainability criteria in a dynamic landscape |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2075226776 (DE-He213)s10980-009-9351-y-p |
| title_full |
Relating tradable credits for biodiversity to sustainability criteria in a dynamic landscape |
| author_sort |
Bruggeman, Douglas J. |
| journal |
Landscape ecology |
| journalStr |
Landscape ecology |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 900 - History & geography 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2009 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
775 |
| author_browse |
Bruggeman, Douglas J. Jones, Michael L. Scribner, Kim Lupi, Frank |
| container_volume |
24 |
| class |
570 910 630 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Bruggeman, Douglas J. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10980-009-9351-y |
| dewey-full |
570 910 630 |
| title_sort |
relating tradable credits for biodiversity to sustainability criteria in a dynamic landscape |
| title_auth |
Relating tradable credits for biodiversity to sustainability criteria in a dynamic landscape |
| abstract |
Abstract Tradable biodiversity credit systems provide flexible means to resolve conflicts between development and conservation land-use options for habitats occupied by threatened or endangered species. We describe an approach to incorporate the influence of habitat fragmentation into the conservation value of tradable credits. Habitat fragmentation decreases gene flow, increases rates of genetic drift and inbreeding, and increases probabilities of patch extinction. Importantly, tradable credit systems will change the level of fragmentation over time for small and/or declining populations. We apply landscape equivalency analysis (LEA), a generalizable, landscape-scale accounting system that assigns conservation value to habitat patches based on patch contributions to abundance and genetic variance at landscape scales. By evaluating habitat trades using two models that vary the relationship between dispersal behaviors and landscape patterns, we show that LEA provides a novel method for limiting access to habitat at the landscape-scale, recognizing that the appropriate amount of migration needed to supplement patch recruitment and to offset drift and inbreeding will vary as landscape pattern changes over time. We also found that decisions based on probabilities of persistence alone would ignore changes in migration, genetic drift, and patch extinction that result from habitat trades. The general principle of LEA is that habitat patches traded should make at least equivalent contributions to rates of recruitment and migration estimated at a landscape scale. Traditional approaches for assessing the “take” and “jeopardy” standards under the Endangered Species Act based on changes in abundance and probability of persistence may be inadequate to prevent trades that increase fragmentation. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Tradable biodiversity credit systems provide flexible means to resolve conflicts between development and conservation land-use options for habitats occupied by threatened or endangered species. We describe an approach to incorporate the influence of habitat fragmentation into the conservation value of tradable credits. Habitat fragmentation decreases gene flow, increases rates of genetic drift and inbreeding, and increases probabilities of patch extinction. Importantly, tradable credit systems will change the level of fragmentation over time for small and/or declining populations. We apply landscape equivalency analysis (LEA), a generalizable, landscape-scale accounting system that assigns conservation value to habitat patches based on patch contributions to abundance and genetic variance at landscape scales. By evaluating habitat trades using two models that vary the relationship between dispersal behaviors and landscape patterns, we show that LEA provides a novel method for limiting access to habitat at the landscape-scale, recognizing that the appropriate amount of migration needed to supplement patch recruitment and to offset drift and inbreeding will vary as landscape pattern changes over time. We also found that decisions based on probabilities of persistence alone would ignore changes in migration, genetic drift, and patch extinction that result from habitat trades. The general principle of LEA is that habitat patches traded should make at least equivalent contributions to rates of recruitment and migration estimated at a landscape scale. Traditional approaches for assessing the “take” and “jeopardy” standards under the Endangered Species Act based on changes in abundance and probability of persistence may be inadequate to prevent trades that increase fragmentation. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Tradable biodiversity credit systems provide flexible means to resolve conflicts between development and conservation land-use options for habitats occupied by threatened or endangered species. We describe an approach to incorporate the influence of habitat fragmentation into the conservation value of tradable credits. Habitat fragmentation decreases gene flow, increases rates of genetic drift and inbreeding, and increases probabilities of patch extinction. Importantly, tradable credit systems will change the level of fragmentation over time for small and/or declining populations. We apply landscape equivalency analysis (LEA), a generalizable, landscape-scale accounting system that assigns conservation value to habitat patches based on patch contributions to abundance and genetic variance at landscape scales. By evaluating habitat trades using two models that vary the relationship between dispersal behaviors and landscape patterns, we show that LEA provides a novel method for limiting access to habitat at the landscape-scale, recognizing that the appropriate amount of migration needed to supplement patch recruitment and to offset drift and inbreeding will vary as landscape pattern changes over time. We also found that decisions based on probabilities of persistence alone would ignore changes in migration, genetic drift, and patch extinction that result from habitat trades. The general principle of LEA is that habitat patches traded should make at least equivalent contributions to rates of recruitment and migration estimated at a landscape scale. Traditional approaches for assessing the “take” and “jeopardy” standards under the Endangered Species Act based on changes in abundance and probability of persistence may be inadequate to prevent trades that increase fragmentation. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4219 |
| container_issue |
6 |
| title_short |
Relating tradable credits for biodiversity to sustainability criteria in a dynamic landscape |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9351-y |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Jones, Michael L. Scribner, Kim Lupi, Frank |
| author2Str |
Jones, Michael L. Scribner, Kim Lupi, Frank |
| ppnlink |
130857424 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10980-009-9351-y |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T00:44:58.746Z |
| _version_ |
1803607236933582848 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2075226776</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503171127.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2009 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10980-009-9351-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2075226776</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10980-009-9351-y-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">910</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bruggeman, Douglas J.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Relating tradable credits for biodiversity to sustainability criteria in a dynamic landscape</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Tradable biodiversity credit systems provide flexible means to resolve conflicts between development and conservation land-use options for habitats occupied by threatened or endangered species. We describe an approach to incorporate the influence of habitat fragmentation into the conservation value of tradable credits. Habitat fragmentation decreases gene flow, increases rates of genetic drift and inbreeding, and increases probabilities of patch extinction. Importantly, tradable credit systems will change the level of fragmentation over time for small and/or declining populations. We apply landscape equivalency analysis (LEA), a generalizable, landscape-scale accounting system that assigns conservation value to habitat patches based on patch contributions to abundance and genetic variance at landscape scales. By evaluating habitat trades using two models that vary the relationship between dispersal behaviors and landscape patterns, we show that LEA provides a novel method for limiting access to habitat at the landscape-scale, recognizing that the appropriate amount of migration needed to supplement patch recruitment and to offset drift and inbreeding will vary as landscape pattern changes over time. We also found that decisions based on probabilities of persistence alone would ignore changes in migration, genetic drift, and patch extinction that result from habitat trades. The general principle of LEA is that habitat patches traded should make at least equivalent contributions to rates of recruitment and migration estimated at a landscape scale. Traditional approaches for assessing the “take” and “jeopardy” standards under the Endangered Species Act based on changes in abundance and probability of persistence may be inadequate to prevent trades that increase fragmentation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tradable credits</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Endangered Species Act</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Habitat fragmentation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Extinction risk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Landscape genetics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Landscape equivalency analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ecosystem services</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Red cockaded woodpeckers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gene flow</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Genetic drift</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jones, Michael L.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Scribner, Kim</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lupi, Frank</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Landscape ecology</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1987</subfield><subfield code="g">24(2009), 6 vom: 07. Mai, Seite 775-790</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130857424</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1027798-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)052841901</subfield><subfield code="x">0921-2973</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2009</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:07</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:775-790</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9351-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">2009</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="b">07</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">775-790</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3972054 |