Predictions from high scale mixing unification hypothesis
Abstract Starting with ‘high scale mixing unification’ hypothesis, we investigate the renormalization group evolution of mixing parameters and masses for both Dirac and Majorana-type neutrinos. Following this hypothesis, the PMNS mixing parameters are taken to be identical to the CKM ones at a unify...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
SRIVASTAVA, Rahul [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2016 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Indian Academy of Sciences 2016 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Pramāna - Springer India, 1973, 86(2016), 2 vom: 09. Jan., Seite 425-436 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:86 ; year:2016 ; number:2 ; day:09 ; month:01 ; pages:425-436 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s12043-015-1163-9 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC2076066926 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2076066926 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230402043112.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 200820s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s12043-015-1163-9 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2076066926 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s12043-015-1163-9-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |q VZ |
100 | 1 | |a SRIVASTAVA, Rahul |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Predictions from high scale mixing unification hypothesis |
264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Indian Academy of Sciences 2016 | ||
520 | |a Abstract Starting with ‘high scale mixing unification’ hypothesis, we investigate the renormalization group evolution of mixing parameters and masses for both Dirac and Majorana-type neutrinos. Following this hypothesis, the PMNS mixing parameters are taken to be identical to the CKM ones at a unifying high scale. Then, they are evolved to a low scale using MSSM renormalization group equations. For both types of neutrinos, the renormalization group evolution naturally results in a non-zero and small value of leptonic mixing angle 13. One of the important predictions of this analysis is that, in both cases, the mixing angle 23 turns out to be non-maximal for most of the parameter range. We also elaborate on the important differences between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos within our framework and how to experimentally distinguish between the two scenarios. Furthermore, for both cases, we also derive constraints on the allowed parameter range for the SUSY breaking and unification scales, for which this hypothesis works. The results can be tested by the present and future experiments. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Neutrino oscillation | |
650 | 4 | |a neutrino Majorana | |
650 | 4 | |a neutrino Dirac | |
650 | 4 | |a Supersymmetry | |
650 | 4 | |a symmetry breaking | |
650 | 4 | |a PMNS matrix | |
650 | 4 | |a mixing angles | |
650 | 4 | |a renormalization group | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Pramāna |d Springer India, 1973 |g 86(2016), 2 vom: 09. Jan., Seite 425-436 |w (DE-627)129403342 |w (DE-600)186949-8 |w (DE-576)014785102 |x 0304-4289 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:86 |g year:2016 |g number:2 |g day:09 |g month:01 |g pages:425-436 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-015-1163-9 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHY | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 86 |j 2016 |e 2 |b 09 |c 01 |h 425-436 |
author_variant |
r s rs |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:03044289:2016----::rdcinfohgsaeiignfc |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
publishDate |
2016 |
allfields |
10.1007/s12043-015-1163-9 doi (DE-627)OLC2076066926 (DE-He213)s12043-015-1163-9-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 VZ SRIVASTAVA, Rahul verfasserin aut Predictions from high scale mixing unification hypothesis 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Indian Academy of Sciences 2016 Abstract Starting with ‘high scale mixing unification’ hypothesis, we investigate the renormalization group evolution of mixing parameters and masses for both Dirac and Majorana-type neutrinos. Following this hypothesis, the PMNS mixing parameters are taken to be identical to the CKM ones at a unifying high scale. Then, they are evolved to a low scale using MSSM renormalization group equations. For both types of neutrinos, the renormalization group evolution naturally results in a non-zero and small value of leptonic mixing angle 𝜃13. One of the important predictions of this analysis is that, in both cases, the mixing angle 𝜃23 turns out to be non-maximal for most of the parameter range. We also elaborate on the important differences between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos within our framework and how to experimentally distinguish between the two scenarios. Furthermore, for both cases, we also derive constraints on the allowed parameter range for the SUSY breaking and unification scales, for which this hypothesis works. The results can be tested by the present and future experiments. Neutrino oscillation neutrino Majorana neutrino Dirac Supersymmetry symmetry breaking PMNS matrix mixing angles renormalization group Enthalten in Pramāna Springer India, 1973 86(2016), 2 vom: 09. Jan., Seite 425-436 (DE-627)129403342 (DE-600)186949-8 (DE-576)014785102 0304-4289 nnns volume:86 year:2016 number:2 day:09 month:01 pages:425-436 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-015-1163-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_70 AR 86 2016 2 09 01 425-436 |
spelling |
10.1007/s12043-015-1163-9 doi (DE-627)OLC2076066926 (DE-He213)s12043-015-1163-9-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 VZ SRIVASTAVA, Rahul verfasserin aut Predictions from high scale mixing unification hypothesis 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Indian Academy of Sciences 2016 Abstract Starting with ‘high scale mixing unification’ hypothesis, we investigate the renormalization group evolution of mixing parameters and masses for both Dirac and Majorana-type neutrinos. Following this hypothesis, the PMNS mixing parameters are taken to be identical to the CKM ones at a unifying high scale. Then, they are evolved to a low scale using MSSM renormalization group equations. For both types of neutrinos, the renormalization group evolution naturally results in a non-zero and small value of leptonic mixing angle 𝜃13. One of the important predictions of this analysis is that, in both cases, the mixing angle 𝜃23 turns out to be non-maximal for most of the parameter range. We also elaborate on the important differences between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos within our framework and how to experimentally distinguish between the two scenarios. Furthermore, for both cases, we also derive constraints on the allowed parameter range for the SUSY breaking and unification scales, for which this hypothesis works. The results can be tested by the present and future experiments. Neutrino oscillation neutrino Majorana neutrino Dirac Supersymmetry symmetry breaking PMNS matrix mixing angles renormalization group Enthalten in Pramāna Springer India, 1973 86(2016), 2 vom: 09. Jan., Seite 425-436 (DE-627)129403342 (DE-600)186949-8 (DE-576)014785102 0304-4289 nnns volume:86 year:2016 number:2 day:09 month:01 pages:425-436 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-015-1163-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_70 AR 86 2016 2 09 01 425-436 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s12043-015-1163-9 doi (DE-627)OLC2076066926 (DE-He213)s12043-015-1163-9-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 VZ SRIVASTAVA, Rahul verfasserin aut Predictions from high scale mixing unification hypothesis 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Indian Academy of Sciences 2016 Abstract Starting with ‘high scale mixing unification’ hypothesis, we investigate the renormalization group evolution of mixing parameters and masses for both Dirac and Majorana-type neutrinos. Following this hypothesis, the PMNS mixing parameters are taken to be identical to the CKM ones at a unifying high scale. Then, they are evolved to a low scale using MSSM renormalization group equations. For both types of neutrinos, the renormalization group evolution naturally results in a non-zero and small value of leptonic mixing angle 𝜃13. One of the important predictions of this analysis is that, in both cases, the mixing angle 𝜃23 turns out to be non-maximal for most of the parameter range. We also elaborate on the important differences between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos within our framework and how to experimentally distinguish between the two scenarios. Furthermore, for both cases, we also derive constraints on the allowed parameter range for the SUSY breaking and unification scales, for which this hypothesis works. The results can be tested by the present and future experiments. Neutrino oscillation neutrino Majorana neutrino Dirac Supersymmetry symmetry breaking PMNS matrix mixing angles renormalization group Enthalten in Pramāna Springer India, 1973 86(2016), 2 vom: 09. Jan., Seite 425-436 (DE-627)129403342 (DE-600)186949-8 (DE-576)014785102 0304-4289 nnns volume:86 year:2016 number:2 day:09 month:01 pages:425-436 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-015-1163-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_70 AR 86 2016 2 09 01 425-436 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s12043-015-1163-9 doi (DE-627)OLC2076066926 (DE-He213)s12043-015-1163-9-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 VZ SRIVASTAVA, Rahul verfasserin aut Predictions from high scale mixing unification hypothesis 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Indian Academy of Sciences 2016 Abstract Starting with ‘high scale mixing unification’ hypothesis, we investigate the renormalization group evolution of mixing parameters and masses for both Dirac and Majorana-type neutrinos. Following this hypothesis, the PMNS mixing parameters are taken to be identical to the CKM ones at a unifying high scale. Then, they are evolved to a low scale using MSSM renormalization group equations. For both types of neutrinos, the renormalization group evolution naturally results in a non-zero and small value of leptonic mixing angle 𝜃13. One of the important predictions of this analysis is that, in both cases, the mixing angle 𝜃23 turns out to be non-maximal for most of the parameter range. We also elaborate on the important differences between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos within our framework and how to experimentally distinguish between the two scenarios. Furthermore, for both cases, we also derive constraints on the allowed parameter range for the SUSY breaking and unification scales, for which this hypothesis works. The results can be tested by the present and future experiments. Neutrino oscillation neutrino Majorana neutrino Dirac Supersymmetry symmetry breaking PMNS matrix mixing angles renormalization group Enthalten in Pramāna Springer India, 1973 86(2016), 2 vom: 09. Jan., Seite 425-436 (DE-627)129403342 (DE-600)186949-8 (DE-576)014785102 0304-4289 nnns volume:86 year:2016 number:2 day:09 month:01 pages:425-436 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-015-1163-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_70 AR 86 2016 2 09 01 425-436 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s12043-015-1163-9 doi (DE-627)OLC2076066926 (DE-He213)s12043-015-1163-9-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 VZ SRIVASTAVA, Rahul verfasserin aut Predictions from high scale mixing unification hypothesis 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Indian Academy of Sciences 2016 Abstract Starting with ‘high scale mixing unification’ hypothesis, we investigate the renormalization group evolution of mixing parameters and masses for both Dirac and Majorana-type neutrinos. Following this hypothesis, the PMNS mixing parameters are taken to be identical to the CKM ones at a unifying high scale. Then, they are evolved to a low scale using MSSM renormalization group equations. For both types of neutrinos, the renormalization group evolution naturally results in a non-zero and small value of leptonic mixing angle 𝜃13. One of the important predictions of this analysis is that, in both cases, the mixing angle 𝜃23 turns out to be non-maximal for most of the parameter range. We also elaborate on the important differences between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos within our framework and how to experimentally distinguish between the two scenarios. Furthermore, for both cases, we also derive constraints on the allowed parameter range for the SUSY breaking and unification scales, for which this hypothesis works. The results can be tested by the present and future experiments. Neutrino oscillation neutrino Majorana neutrino Dirac Supersymmetry symmetry breaking PMNS matrix mixing angles renormalization group Enthalten in Pramāna Springer India, 1973 86(2016), 2 vom: 09. Jan., Seite 425-436 (DE-627)129403342 (DE-600)186949-8 (DE-576)014785102 0304-4289 nnns volume:86 year:2016 number:2 day:09 month:01 pages:425-436 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-015-1163-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_70 AR 86 2016 2 09 01 425-436 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Pramāna 86(2016), 2 vom: 09. Jan., Seite 425-436 volume:86 year:2016 number:2 day:09 month:01 pages:425-436 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Pramāna 86(2016), 2 vom: 09. Jan., Seite 425-436 volume:86 year:2016 number:2 day:09 month:01 pages:425-436 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Neutrino oscillation neutrino Majorana neutrino Dirac Supersymmetry symmetry breaking PMNS matrix mixing angles renormalization group |
dewey-raw |
530 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Pramāna |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
SRIVASTAVA, Rahul @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-09T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
129403342 |
dewey-sort |
3530 |
id |
OLC2076066926 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2076066926</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230402043112.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s12043-015-1163-9</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2076066926</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s12043-015-1163-9-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SRIVASTAVA, Rahul</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Predictions from high scale mixing unification hypothesis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Indian Academy of Sciences 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Starting with ‘high scale mixing unification’ hypothesis, we investigate the renormalization group evolution of mixing parameters and masses for both Dirac and Majorana-type neutrinos. Following this hypothesis, the PMNS mixing parameters are taken to be identical to the CKM ones at a unifying high scale. Then, they are evolved to a low scale using MSSM renormalization group equations. For both types of neutrinos, the renormalization group evolution naturally results in a non-zero and small value of leptonic mixing angle 𝜃13. One of the important predictions of this analysis is that, in both cases, the mixing angle 𝜃23 turns out to be non-maximal for most of the parameter range. We also elaborate on the important differences between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos within our framework and how to experimentally distinguish between the two scenarios. Furthermore, for both cases, we also derive constraints on the allowed parameter range for the SUSY breaking and unification scales, for which this hypothesis works. The results can be tested by the present and future experiments.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Neutrino oscillation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">neutrino Majorana</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">neutrino Dirac</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Supersymmetry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">symmetry breaking</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">PMNS matrix</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">mixing angles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">renormalization group</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Pramāna</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer India, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">86(2016), 2 vom: 09. Jan., Seite 425-436</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129403342</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)186949-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014785102</subfield><subfield code="x">0304-4289</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:86</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:09</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:425-436</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-015-1163-9</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">86</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">09</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">425-436</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
SRIVASTAVA, Rahul |
spellingShingle |
SRIVASTAVA, Rahul ddc 530 misc Neutrino oscillation misc neutrino Majorana misc neutrino Dirac misc Supersymmetry misc symmetry breaking misc PMNS matrix misc mixing angles misc renormalization group Predictions from high scale mixing unification hypothesis |
authorStr |
SRIVASTAVA, Rahul |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129403342 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
530 - Physics |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0304-4289 |
topic_title |
530 VZ Predictions from high scale mixing unification hypothesis Neutrino oscillation neutrino Majorana neutrino Dirac Supersymmetry symmetry breaking PMNS matrix mixing angles renormalization group |
topic |
ddc 530 misc Neutrino oscillation misc neutrino Majorana misc neutrino Dirac misc Supersymmetry misc symmetry breaking misc PMNS matrix misc mixing angles misc renormalization group |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 530 misc Neutrino oscillation misc neutrino Majorana misc neutrino Dirac misc Supersymmetry misc symmetry breaking misc PMNS matrix misc mixing angles misc renormalization group |
topic_browse |
ddc 530 misc Neutrino oscillation misc neutrino Majorana misc neutrino Dirac misc Supersymmetry misc symmetry breaking misc PMNS matrix misc mixing angles misc renormalization group |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Pramāna |
hierarchy_parent_id |
129403342 |
dewey-tens |
530 - Physics |
hierarchy_top_title |
Pramāna |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129403342 (DE-600)186949-8 (DE-576)014785102 |
title |
Predictions from high scale mixing unification hypothesis |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2076066926 (DE-He213)s12043-015-1163-9-p |
title_full |
Predictions from high scale mixing unification hypothesis |
author_sort |
SRIVASTAVA, Rahul |
journal |
Pramāna |
journalStr |
Pramāna |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2016 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
425 |
author_browse |
SRIVASTAVA, Rahul |
container_volume |
86 |
class |
530 VZ |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
SRIVASTAVA, Rahul |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s12043-015-1163-9 |
dewey-full |
530 |
title_sort |
predictions from high scale mixing unification hypothesis |
title_auth |
Predictions from high scale mixing unification hypothesis |
abstract |
Abstract Starting with ‘high scale mixing unification’ hypothesis, we investigate the renormalization group evolution of mixing parameters and masses for both Dirac and Majorana-type neutrinos. Following this hypothesis, the PMNS mixing parameters are taken to be identical to the CKM ones at a unifying high scale. Then, they are evolved to a low scale using MSSM renormalization group equations. For both types of neutrinos, the renormalization group evolution naturally results in a non-zero and small value of leptonic mixing angle 𝜃13. One of the important predictions of this analysis is that, in both cases, the mixing angle 𝜃23 turns out to be non-maximal for most of the parameter range. We also elaborate on the important differences between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos within our framework and how to experimentally distinguish between the two scenarios. Furthermore, for both cases, we also derive constraints on the allowed parameter range for the SUSY breaking and unification scales, for which this hypothesis works. The results can be tested by the present and future experiments. © Indian Academy of Sciences 2016 |
abstractGer |
Abstract Starting with ‘high scale mixing unification’ hypothesis, we investigate the renormalization group evolution of mixing parameters and masses for both Dirac and Majorana-type neutrinos. Following this hypothesis, the PMNS mixing parameters are taken to be identical to the CKM ones at a unifying high scale. Then, they are evolved to a low scale using MSSM renormalization group equations. For both types of neutrinos, the renormalization group evolution naturally results in a non-zero and small value of leptonic mixing angle 𝜃13. One of the important predictions of this analysis is that, in both cases, the mixing angle 𝜃23 turns out to be non-maximal for most of the parameter range. We also elaborate on the important differences between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos within our framework and how to experimentally distinguish between the two scenarios. Furthermore, for both cases, we also derive constraints on the allowed parameter range for the SUSY breaking and unification scales, for which this hypothesis works. The results can be tested by the present and future experiments. © Indian Academy of Sciences 2016 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Starting with ‘high scale mixing unification’ hypothesis, we investigate the renormalization group evolution of mixing parameters and masses for both Dirac and Majorana-type neutrinos. Following this hypothesis, the PMNS mixing parameters are taken to be identical to the CKM ones at a unifying high scale. Then, they are evolved to a low scale using MSSM renormalization group equations. For both types of neutrinos, the renormalization group evolution naturally results in a non-zero and small value of leptonic mixing angle 𝜃13. One of the important predictions of this analysis is that, in both cases, the mixing angle 𝜃23 turns out to be non-maximal for most of the parameter range. We also elaborate on the important differences between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos within our framework and how to experimentally distinguish between the two scenarios. Furthermore, for both cases, we also derive constraints on the allowed parameter range for the SUSY breaking and unification scales, for which this hypothesis works. The results can be tested by the present and future experiments. © Indian Academy of Sciences 2016 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_70 |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
Predictions from high scale mixing unification hypothesis |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-015-1163-9 |
remote_bool |
false |
ppnlink |
129403342 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s12043-015-1163-9 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T02:35:18.644Z |
_version_ |
1803614178400796672 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2076066926</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230402043112.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s12043-015-1163-9</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2076066926</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s12043-015-1163-9-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SRIVASTAVA, Rahul</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Predictions from high scale mixing unification hypothesis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Indian Academy of Sciences 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Starting with ‘high scale mixing unification’ hypothesis, we investigate the renormalization group evolution of mixing parameters and masses for both Dirac and Majorana-type neutrinos. Following this hypothesis, the PMNS mixing parameters are taken to be identical to the CKM ones at a unifying high scale. Then, they are evolved to a low scale using MSSM renormalization group equations. For both types of neutrinos, the renormalization group evolution naturally results in a non-zero and small value of leptonic mixing angle 𝜃13. One of the important predictions of this analysis is that, in both cases, the mixing angle 𝜃23 turns out to be non-maximal for most of the parameter range. We also elaborate on the important differences between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos within our framework and how to experimentally distinguish between the two scenarios. Furthermore, for both cases, we also derive constraints on the allowed parameter range for the SUSY breaking and unification scales, for which this hypothesis works. The results can be tested by the present and future experiments.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Neutrino oscillation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">neutrino Majorana</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">neutrino Dirac</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Supersymmetry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">symmetry breaking</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">PMNS matrix</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">mixing angles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">renormalization group</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Pramāna</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer India, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">86(2016), 2 vom: 09. Jan., Seite 425-436</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129403342</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)186949-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014785102</subfield><subfield code="x">0304-4289</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:86</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:09</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:425-436</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-015-1163-9</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">86</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">09</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">425-436</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3991175 |