Swedish vision zero experience
Abstract The objective of this paper is to present the Swedish Vision Zero Experience concerning separating car traffic with cable barriers and upgrading traffic safety on existing 13 m roads using low cost measures. There is a significant difference in traffic performance, safety, investment and ma...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Bergh, T [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2003 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Woodhead Publishing 2003 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: International journal of crashworthiness - Woodhead Publishing, 1996, 8(2003), 2 vom: Jan., Seite 159-167 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:8 ; year:2003 ; number:2 ; month:01 ; pages:159-167 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1533/ijcr.2003.0224 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC2076432833 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2076432833 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230503074417.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 200820s2003 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1533/ijcr.2003.0224 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2076432833 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)ijcr.2003.0224-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 510 |q VZ |
100 | 1 | |a Bergh, T |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Swedish vision zero experience |
264 | 1 | |c 2003 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Woodhead Publishing 2003 | ||
520 | |a Abstract The objective of this paper is to present the Swedish Vision Zero Experience concerning separating car traffic with cable barriers and upgrading traffic safety on existing 13 m roads using low cost measures. There is a significant difference in traffic performance, safety, investment and maintenance costs, land requirement and intrusion between normal two-lane and four-lane cross-sections. In Sweden, this gap has been narrowed with a 13 m road with 3.75 m traffic lanes and 2.75 m hard shoulders. The traffic performance of these roads is quite satisfactory but there are safety problems with fatal accidents. The main problem on all two-lane roads is run-off road and head-on accidents causing more than 66% of all fatalities. The event process tends to be the same. The driver loses control for some reason and crashes against some obstacle in the roadside area or opposing vehicle. In 1998, the Director General of SNRA decided on a full-scale programme to improve traffic safety on six existing 13 m roads using low-cost measures, preferably within the existing right-of-way. The main alternative is the 2+1 solution with a separating cable barrier, preferably within the existing 13 m width. This solution was estimated to have a potential to prevent some 50% of all severe link accidents. Findings so far have been so successful that SNRA has decided to generally replace the old 13 m roads with the 2 + 1 solution. The main results and findings up to May 2001 are as follows: Level-of-service for normal traffic is better than expected. Speed performance on 2 + 1 roads with cable barrier is the same, or even better than an ordinary semi-motorway at one directional flows up to 1 400 v/h. The capacity is estimated to be about 1 650 v/h in one direction, some 300 v/h less than for an ordinary 13 m road. Emergency and tow agencies are complaining as their workload have increased. The transition zones from 2 to 1 lane have performed well. The proportion of vehicles in the beginning of the zone is small. Drivers tend handle the design of the transition zones in a cautious and responsible manner. The traffic safety effect on severe accidents was expected to be high on 2 + 1 road with cable barrier. So far in eight objects total length there has not been any fatal and only 6 persons with severe injuries. This is about 60% less than on ordinary semi-motorways and supports the prediction that fatal and severe injuries can be reduced with up to 50%. Median cable barrier crashes are very frequent but normally without person injuries. They are often caused by skidding, flat tire or loss of control. A number of possible severe accidents have been converted by means of the median cable barrier to crashes with slight or no injuries. Driver attitude surveys show that drivers attitude to roads with cable barrier have been changed in a positive direction. About 40% of the drivers say it is the best design. General survey shows that about 76% say that they want all major roads to have median barrier. The maintenance costs are increased with about 120 Thousand SEK (12000 USD) per km per year. The main costs are cable repairs with 80 Thousand SEK (8000 USD) per km per year. Work zone safety at cable barrier repairs is a major concern. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Traffic Safety | |
650 | 4 | |a Severe Accident | |
650 | 4 | |a Fatal Accident | |
650 | 4 | |a Land Requirement | |
650 | 4 | |a Traffic Lane | |
700 | 1 | |a Carlsson, A |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Larsson, M |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of crashworthiness |d Woodhead Publishing, 1996 |g 8(2003), 2 vom: Jan., Seite 159-167 |w (DE-627)219199949 |w (DE-600)1352959-6 |w (DE-576)9219199947 |x 1358-8265 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2003 |g number:2 |g month:01 |g pages:159-167 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1533/ijcr.2003.0224 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-MAT | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 8 |j 2003 |e 2 |c 01 |h 159-167 |
author_variant |
t b tb a c ac m l ml |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:13588265:2003----::wdsvsozre |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2003 |
publishDate |
2003 |
allfields |
10.1533/ijcr.2003.0224 doi (DE-627)OLC2076432833 (DE-He213)ijcr.2003.0224-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 510 VZ Bergh, T verfasserin aut Swedish vision zero experience 2003 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Woodhead Publishing 2003 Abstract The objective of this paper is to present the Swedish Vision Zero Experience concerning separating car traffic with cable barriers and upgrading traffic safety on existing 13 m roads using low cost measures. There is a significant difference in traffic performance, safety, investment and maintenance costs, land requirement and intrusion between normal two-lane and four-lane cross-sections. In Sweden, this gap has been narrowed with a 13 m road with 3.75 m traffic lanes and 2.75 m hard shoulders. The traffic performance of these roads is quite satisfactory but there are safety problems with fatal accidents. The main problem on all two-lane roads is run-off road and head-on accidents causing more than 66% of all fatalities. The event process tends to be the same. The driver loses control for some reason and crashes against some obstacle in the roadside area or opposing vehicle. In 1998, the Director General of SNRA decided on a full-scale programme to improve traffic safety on six existing 13 m roads using low-cost measures, preferably within the existing right-of-way. The main alternative is the 2+1 solution with a separating cable barrier, preferably within the existing 13 m width. This solution was estimated to have a potential to prevent some 50% of all severe link accidents. Findings so far have been so successful that SNRA has decided to generally replace the old 13 m roads with the 2 + 1 solution. The main results and findings up to May 2001 are as follows: Level-of-service for normal traffic is better than expected. Speed performance on 2 + 1 roads with cable barrier is the same, or even better than an ordinary semi-motorway at one directional flows up to 1 400 v/h. The capacity is estimated to be about 1 650 v/h in one direction, some 300 v/h less than for an ordinary 13 m road. Emergency and tow agencies are complaining as their workload have increased. The transition zones from 2 to 1 lane have performed well. The proportion of vehicles in the beginning of the zone is small. Drivers tend handle the design of the transition zones in a cautious and responsible manner. The traffic safety effect on severe accidents was expected to be high on 2 + 1 road with cable barrier. So far in eight objects total length there has not been any fatal and only 6 persons with severe injuries. This is about 60% less than on ordinary semi-motorways and supports the prediction that fatal and severe injuries can be reduced with up to 50%. Median cable barrier crashes are very frequent but normally without person injuries. They are often caused by skidding, flat tire or loss of control. A number of possible severe accidents have been converted by means of the median cable barrier to crashes with slight or no injuries. Driver attitude surveys show that drivers attitude to roads with cable barrier have been changed in a positive direction. About 40% of the drivers say it is the best design. General survey shows that about 76% say that they want all major roads to have median barrier. The maintenance costs are increased with about 120 Thousand SEK (12000 USD) per km per year. The main costs are cable repairs with 80 Thousand SEK (8000 USD) per km per year. Work zone safety at cable barrier repairs is a major concern. Traffic Safety Severe Accident Fatal Accident Land Requirement Traffic Lane Carlsson, A aut Larsson, M aut Enthalten in International journal of crashworthiness Woodhead Publishing, 1996 8(2003), 2 vom: Jan., Seite 159-167 (DE-627)219199949 (DE-600)1352959-6 (DE-576)9219199947 1358-8265 nnns volume:8 year:2003 number:2 month:01 pages:159-167 https://doi.org/10.1533/ijcr.2003.0224 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_70 AR 8 2003 2 01 159-167 |
spelling |
10.1533/ijcr.2003.0224 doi (DE-627)OLC2076432833 (DE-He213)ijcr.2003.0224-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 510 VZ Bergh, T verfasserin aut Swedish vision zero experience 2003 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Woodhead Publishing 2003 Abstract The objective of this paper is to present the Swedish Vision Zero Experience concerning separating car traffic with cable barriers and upgrading traffic safety on existing 13 m roads using low cost measures. There is a significant difference in traffic performance, safety, investment and maintenance costs, land requirement and intrusion between normal two-lane and four-lane cross-sections. In Sweden, this gap has been narrowed with a 13 m road with 3.75 m traffic lanes and 2.75 m hard shoulders. The traffic performance of these roads is quite satisfactory but there are safety problems with fatal accidents. The main problem on all two-lane roads is run-off road and head-on accidents causing more than 66% of all fatalities. The event process tends to be the same. The driver loses control for some reason and crashes against some obstacle in the roadside area or opposing vehicle. In 1998, the Director General of SNRA decided on a full-scale programme to improve traffic safety on six existing 13 m roads using low-cost measures, preferably within the existing right-of-way. The main alternative is the 2+1 solution with a separating cable barrier, preferably within the existing 13 m width. This solution was estimated to have a potential to prevent some 50% of all severe link accidents. Findings so far have been so successful that SNRA has decided to generally replace the old 13 m roads with the 2 + 1 solution. The main results and findings up to May 2001 are as follows: Level-of-service for normal traffic is better than expected. Speed performance on 2 + 1 roads with cable barrier is the same, or even better than an ordinary semi-motorway at one directional flows up to 1 400 v/h. The capacity is estimated to be about 1 650 v/h in one direction, some 300 v/h less than for an ordinary 13 m road. Emergency and tow agencies are complaining as their workload have increased. The transition zones from 2 to 1 lane have performed well. The proportion of vehicles in the beginning of the zone is small. Drivers tend handle the design of the transition zones in a cautious and responsible manner. The traffic safety effect on severe accidents was expected to be high on 2 + 1 road with cable barrier. So far in eight objects total length there has not been any fatal and only 6 persons with severe injuries. This is about 60% less than on ordinary semi-motorways and supports the prediction that fatal and severe injuries can be reduced with up to 50%. Median cable barrier crashes are very frequent but normally without person injuries. They are often caused by skidding, flat tire or loss of control. A number of possible severe accidents have been converted by means of the median cable barrier to crashes with slight or no injuries. Driver attitude surveys show that drivers attitude to roads with cable barrier have been changed in a positive direction. About 40% of the drivers say it is the best design. General survey shows that about 76% say that they want all major roads to have median barrier. The maintenance costs are increased with about 120 Thousand SEK (12000 USD) per km per year. The main costs are cable repairs with 80 Thousand SEK (8000 USD) per km per year. Work zone safety at cable barrier repairs is a major concern. Traffic Safety Severe Accident Fatal Accident Land Requirement Traffic Lane Carlsson, A aut Larsson, M aut Enthalten in International journal of crashworthiness Woodhead Publishing, 1996 8(2003), 2 vom: Jan., Seite 159-167 (DE-627)219199949 (DE-600)1352959-6 (DE-576)9219199947 1358-8265 nnns volume:8 year:2003 number:2 month:01 pages:159-167 https://doi.org/10.1533/ijcr.2003.0224 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_70 AR 8 2003 2 01 159-167 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1533/ijcr.2003.0224 doi (DE-627)OLC2076432833 (DE-He213)ijcr.2003.0224-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 510 VZ Bergh, T verfasserin aut Swedish vision zero experience 2003 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Woodhead Publishing 2003 Abstract The objective of this paper is to present the Swedish Vision Zero Experience concerning separating car traffic with cable barriers and upgrading traffic safety on existing 13 m roads using low cost measures. There is a significant difference in traffic performance, safety, investment and maintenance costs, land requirement and intrusion between normal two-lane and four-lane cross-sections. In Sweden, this gap has been narrowed with a 13 m road with 3.75 m traffic lanes and 2.75 m hard shoulders. The traffic performance of these roads is quite satisfactory but there are safety problems with fatal accidents. The main problem on all two-lane roads is run-off road and head-on accidents causing more than 66% of all fatalities. The event process tends to be the same. The driver loses control for some reason and crashes against some obstacle in the roadside area or opposing vehicle. In 1998, the Director General of SNRA decided on a full-scale programme to improve traffic safety on six existing 13 m roads using low-cost measures, preferably within the existing right-of-way. The main alternative is the 2+1 solution with a separating cable barrier, preferably within the existing 13 m width. This solution was estimated to have a potential to prevent some 50% of all severe link accidents. Findings so far have been so successful that SNRA has decided to generally replace the old 13 m roads with the 2 + 1 solution. The main results and findings up to May 2001 are as follows: Level-of-service for normal traffic is better than expected. Speed performance on 2 + 1 roads with cable barrier is the same, or even better than an ordinary semi-motorway at one directional flows up to 1 400 v/h. The capacity is estimated to be about 1 650 v/h in one direction, some 300 v/h less than for an ordinary 13 m road. Emergency and tow agencies are complaining as their workload have increased. The transition zones from 2 to 1 lane have performed well. The proportion of vehicles in the beginning of the zone is small. Drivers tend handle the design of the transition zones in a cautious and responsible manner. The traffic safety effect on severe accidents was expected to be high on 2 + 1 road with cable barrier. So far in eight objects total length there has not been any fatal and only 6 persons with severe injuries. This is about 60% less than on ordinary semi-motorways and supports the prediction that fatal and severe injuries can be reduced with up to 50%. Median cable barrier crashes are very frequent but normally without person injuries. They are often caused by skidding, flat tire or loss of control. A number of possible severe accidents have been converted by means of the median cable barrier to crashes with slight or no injuries. Driver attitude surveys show that drivers attitude to roads with cable barrier have been changed in a positive direction. About 40% of the drivers say it is the best design. General survey shows that about 76% say that they want all major roads to have median barrier. The maintenance costs are increased with about 120 Thousand SEK (12000 USD) per km per year. The main costs are cable repairs with 80 Thousand SEK (8000 USD) per km per year. Work zone safety at cable barrier repairs is a major concern. Traffic Safety Severe Accident Fatal Accident Land Requirement Traffic Lane Carlsson, A aut Larsson, M aut Enthalten in International journal of crashworthiness Woodhead Publishing, 1996 8(2003), 2 vom: Jan., Seite 159-167 (DE-627)219199949 (DE-600)1352959-6 (DE-576)9219199947 1358-8265 nnns volume:8 year:2003 number:2 month:01 pages:159-167 https://doi.org/10.1533/ijcr.2003.0224 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_70 AR 8 2003 2 01 159-167 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1533/ijcr.2003.0224 doi (DE-627)OLC2076432833 (DE-He213)ijcr.2003.0224-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 510 VZ Bergh, T verfasserin aut Swedish vision zero experience 2003 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Woodhead Publishing 2003 Abstract The objective of this paper is to present the Swedish Vision Zero Experience concerning separating car traffic with cable barriers and upgrading traffic safety on existing 13 m roads using low cost measures. There is a significant difference in traffic performance, safety, investment and maintenance costs, land requirement and intrusion between normal two-lane and four-lane cross-sections. In Sweden, this gap has been narrowed with a 13 m road with 3.75 m traffic lanes and 2.75 m hard shoulders. The traffic performance of these roads is quite satisfactory but there are safety problems with fatal accidents. The main problem on all two-lane roads is run-off road and head-on accidents causing more than 66% of all fatalities. The event process tends to be the same. The driver loses control for some reason and crashes against some obstacle in the roadside area or opposing vehicle. In 1998, the Director General of SNRA decided on a full-scale programme to improve traffic safety on six existing 13 m roads using low-cost measures, preferably within the existing right-of-way. The main alternative is the 2+1 solution with a separating cable barrier, preferably within the existing 13 m width. This solution was estimated to have a potential to prevent some 50% of all severe link accidents. Findings so far have been so successful that SNRA has decided to generally replace the old 13 m roads with the 2 + 1 solution. The main results and findings up to May 2001 are as follows: Level-of-service for normal traffic is better than expected. Speed performance on 2 + 1 roads with cable barrier is the same, or even better than an ordinary semi-motorway at one directional flows up to 1 400 v/h. The capacity is estimated to be about 1 650 v/h in one direction, some 300 v/h less than for an ordinary 13 m road. Emergency and tow agencies are complaining as their workload have increased. The transition zones from 2 to 1 lane have performed well. The proportion of vehicles in the beginning of the zone is small. Drivers tend handle the design of the transition zones in a cautious and responsible manner. The traffic safety effect on severe accidents was expected to be high on 2 + 1 road with cable barrier. So far in eight objects total length there has not been any fatal and only 6 persons with severe injuries. This is about 60% less than on ordinary semi-motorways and supports the prediction that fatal and severe injuries can be reduced with up to 50%. Median cable barrier crashes are very frequent but normally without person injuries. They are often caused by skidding, flat tire or loss of control. A number of possible severe accidents have been converted by means of the median cable barrier to crashes with slight or no injuries. Driver attitude surveys show that drivers attitude to roads with cable barrier have been changed in a positive direction. About 40% of the drivers say it is the best design. General survey shows that about 76% say that they want all major roads to have median barrier. The maintenance costs are increased with about 120 Thousand SEK (12000 USD) per km per year. The main costs are cable repairs with 80 Thousand SEK (8000 USD) per km per year. Work zone safety at cable barrier repairs is a major concern. Traffic Safety Severe Accident Fatal Accident Land Requirement Traffic Lane Carlsson, A aut Larsson, M aut Enthalten in International journal of crashworthiness Woodhead Publishing, 1996 8(2003), 2 vom: Jan., Seite 159-167 (DE-627)219199949 (DE-600)1352959-6 (DE-576)9219199947 1358-8265 nnns volume:8 year:2003 number:2 month:01 pages:159-167 https://doi.org/10.1533/ijcr.2003.0224 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_70 AR 8 2003 2 01 159-167 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1533/ijcr.2003.0224 doi (DE-627)OLC2076432833 (DE-He213)ijcr.2003.0224-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 510 VZ Bergh, T verfasserin aut Swedish vision zero experience 2003 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Woodhead Publishing 2003 Abstract The objective of this paper is to present the Swedish Vision Zero Experience concerning separating car traffic with cable barriers and upgrading traffic safety on existing 13 m roads using low cost measures. There is a significant difference in traffic performance, safety, investment and maintenance costs, land requirement and intrusion between normal two-lane and four-lane cross-sections. In Sweden, this gap has been narrowed with a 13 m road with 3.75 m traffic lanes and 2.75 m hard shoulders. The traffic performance of these roads is quite satisfactory but there are safety problems with fatal accidents. The main problem on all two-lane roads is run-off road and head-on accidents causing more than 66% of all fatalities. The event process tends to be the same. The driver loses control for some reason and crashes against some obstacle in the roadside area or opposing vehicle. In 1998, the Director General of SNRA decided on a full-scale programme to improve traffic safety on six existing 13 m roads using low-cost measures, preferably within the existing right-of-way. The main alternative is the 2+1 solution with a separating cable barrier, preferably within the existing 13 m width. This solution was estimated to have a potential to prevent some 50% of all severe link accidents. Findings so far have been so successful that SNRA has decided to generally replace the old 13 m roads with the 2 + 1 solution. The main results and findings up to May 2001 are as follows: Level-of-service for normal traffic is better than expected. Speed performance on 2 + 1 roads with cable barrier is the same, or even better than an ordinary semi-motorway at one directional flows up to 1 400 v/h. The capacity is estimated to be about 1 650 v/h in one direction, some 300 v/h less than for an ordinary 13 m road. Emergency and tow agencies are complaining as their workload have increased. The transition zones from 2 to 1 lane have performed well. The proportion of vehicles in the beginning of the zone is small. Drivers tend handle the design of the transition zones in a cautious and responsible manner. The traffic safety effect on severe accidents was expected to be high on 2 + 1 road with cable barrier. So far in eight objects total length there has not been any fatal and only 6 persons with severe injuries. This is about 60% less than on ordinary semi-motorways and supports the prediction that fatal and severe injuries can be reduced with up to 50%. Median cable barrier crashes are very frequent but normally without person injuries. They are often caused by skidding, flat tire or loss of control. A number of possible severe accidents have been converted by means of the median cable barrier to crashes with slight or no injuries. Driver attitude surveys show that drivers attitude to roads with cable barrier have been changed in a positive direction. About 40% of the drivers say it is the best design. General survey shows that about 76% say that they want all major roads to have median barrier. The maintenance costs are increased with about 120 Thousand SEK (12000 USD) per km per year. The main costs are cable repairs with 80 Thousand SEK (8000 USD) per km per year. Work zone safety at cable barrier repairs is a major concern. Traffic Safety Severe Accident Fatal Accident Land Requirement Traffic Lane Carlsson, A aut Larsson, M aut Enthalten in International journal of crashworthiness Woodhead Publishing, 1996 8(2003), 2 vom: Jan., Seite 159-167 (DE-627)219199949 (DE-600)1352959-6 (DE-576)9219199947 1358-8265 nnns volume:8 year:2003 number:2 month:01 pages:159-167 https://doi.org/10.1533/ijcr.2003.0224 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_70 AR 8 2003 2 01 159-167 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in International journal of crashworthiness 8(2003), 2 vom: Jan., Seite 159-167 volume:8 year:2003 number:2 month:01 pages:159-167 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in International journal of crashworthiness 8(2003), 2 vom: Jan., Seite 159-167 volume:8 year:2003 number:2 month:01 pages:159-167 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Traffic Safety Severe Accident Fatal Accident Land Requirement Traffic Lane |
dewey-raw |
510 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
International journal of crashworthiness |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Bergh, T @@aut@@ Carlsson, A @@aut@@ Larsson, M @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2003-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
219199949 |
dewey-sort |
3510 |
id |
OLC2076432833 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2076432833</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503074417.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2003 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1533/ijcr.2003.0224</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2076432833</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)ijcr.2003.0224-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">510</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bergh, T</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Swedish vision zero experience</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Woodhead Publishing 2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The objective of this paper is to present the Swedish Vision Zero Experience concerning separating car traffic with cable barriers and upgrading traffic safety on existing 13 m roads using low cost measures. There is a significant difference in traffic performance, safety, investment and maintenance costs, land requirement and intrusion between normal two-lane and four-lane cross-sections. In Sweden, this gap has been narrowed with a 13 m road with 3.75 m traffic lanes and 2.75 m hard shoulders. The traffic performance of these roads is quite satisfactory but there are safety problems with fatal accidents. The main problem on all two-lane roads is run-off road and head-on accidents causing more than 66% of all fatalities. The event process tends to be the same. The driver loses control for some reason and crashes against some obstacle in the roadside area or opposing vehicle. In 1998, the Director General of SNRA decided on a full-scale programme to improve traffic safety on six existing 13 m roads using low-cost measures, preferably within the existing right-of-way. The main alternative is the 2+1 solution with a separating cable barrier, preferably within the existing 13 m width. This solution was estimated to have a potential to prevent some 50% of all severe link accidents. Findings so far have been so successful that SNRA has decided to generally replace the old 13 m roads with the 2 + 1 solution. The main results and findings up to May 2001 are as follows: Level-of-service for normal traffic is better than expected. Speed performance on 2 + 1 roads with cable barrier is the same, or even better than an ordinary semi-motorway at one directional flows up to 1 400 v/h. The capacity is estimated to be about 1 650 v/h in one direction, some 300 v/h less than for an ordinary 13 m road. Emergency and tow agencies are complaining as their workload have increased. The transition zones from 2 to 1 lane have performed well. The proportion of vehicles in the beginning of the zone is small. Drivers tend handle the design of the transition zones in a cautious and responsible manner. The traffic safety effect on severe accidents was expected to be high on 2 + 1 road with cable barrier. So far in eight objects total length there has not been any fatal and only 6 persons with severe injuries. This is about 60% less than on ordinary semi-motorways and supports the prediction that fatal and severe injuries can be reduced with up to 50%. Median cable barrier crashes are very frequent but normally without person injuries. They are often caused by skidding, flat tire or loss of control. A number of possible severe accidents have been converted by means of the median cable barrier to crashes with slight or no injuries. Driver attitude surveys show that drivers attitude to roads with cable barrier have been changed in a positive direction. About 40% of the drivers say it is the best design. General survey shows that about 76% say that they want all major roads to have median barrier. The maintenance costs are increased with about 120 Thousand SEK (12000 USD) per km per year. The main costs are cable repairs with 80 Thousand SEK (8000 USD) per km per year. Work zone safety at cable barrier repairs is a major concern.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Traffic Safety</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Severe Accident</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fatal Accident</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Land Requirement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Traffic Lane</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Carlsson, A</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Larsson, M</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of crashworthiness</subfield><subfield code="d">Woodhead Publishing, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2003), 2 vom: Jan., Seite 159-167</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)219199949</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1352959-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)9219199947</subfield><subfield code="x">1358-8265</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2003</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:159-167</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1533/ijcr.2003.0224</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2003</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">159-167</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Bergh, T |
spellingShingle |
Bergh, T ddc 510 misc Traffic Safety misc Severe Accident misc Fatal Accident misc Land Requirement misc Traffic Lane Swedish vision zero experience |
authorStr |
Bergh, T |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)219199949 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
510 - Mathematics |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1358-8265 |
topic_title |
510 VZ Swedish vision zero experience Traffic Safety Severe Accident Fatal Accident Land Requirement Traffic Lane |
topic |
ddc 510 misc Traffic Safety misc Severe Accident misc Fatal Accident misc Land Requirement misc Traffic Lane |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 510 misc Traffic Safety misc Severe Accident misc Fatal Accident misc Land Requirement misc Traffic Lane |
topic_browse |
ddc 510 misc Traffic Safety misc Severe Accident misc Fatal Accident misc Land Requirement misc Traffic Lane |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
International journal of crashworthiness |
hierarchy_parent_id |
219199949 |
dewey-tens |
510 - Mathematics |
hierarchy_top_title |
International journal of crashworthiness |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)219199949 (DE-600)1352959-6 (DE-576)9219199947 |
title |
Swedish vision zero experience |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2076432833 (DE-He213)ijcr.2003.0224-p |
title_full |
Swedish vision zero experience |
author_sort |
Bergh, T |
journal |
International journal of crashworthiness |
journalStr |
International journal of crashworthiness |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2003 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
159 |
author_browse |
Bergh, T Carlsson, A Larsson, M |
container_volume |
8 |
class |
510 VZ |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Bergh, T |
doi_str_mv |
10.1533/ijcr.2003.0224 |
dewey-full |
510 |
title_sort |
swedish vision zero experience |
title_auth |
Swedish vision zero experience |
abstract |
Abstract The objective of this paper is to present the Swedish Vision Zero Experience concerning separating car traffic with cable barriers and upgrading traffic safety on existing 13 m roads using low cost measures. There is a significant difference in traffic performance, safety, investment and maintenance costs, land requirement and intrusion between normal two-lane and four-lane cross-sections. In Sweden, this gap has been narrowed with a 13 m road with 3.75 m traffic lanes and 2.75 m hard shoulders. The traffic performance of these roads is quite satisfactory but there are safety problems with fatal accidents. The main problem on all two-lane roads is run-off road and head-on accidents causing more than 66% of all fatalities. The event process tends to be the same. The driver loses control for some reason and crashes against some obstacle in the roadside area or opposing vehicle. In 1998, the Director General of SNRA decided on a full-scale programme to improve traffic safety on six existing 13 m roads using low-cost measures, preferably within the existing right-of-way. The main alternative is the 2+1 solution with a separating cable barrier, preferably within the existing 13 m width. This solution was estimated to have a potential to prevent some 50% of all severe link accidents. Findings so far have been so successful that SNRA has decided to generally replace the old 13 m roads with the 2 + 1 solution. The main results and findings up to May 2001 are as follows: Level-of-service for normal traffic is better than expected. Speed performance on 2 + 1 roads with cable barrier is the same, or even better than an ordinary semi-motorway at one directional flows up to 1 400 v/h. The capacity is estimated to be about 1 650 v/h in one direction, some 300 v/h less than for an ordinary 13 m road. Emergency and tow agencies are complaining as their workload have increased. The transition zones from 2 to 1 lane have performed well. The proportion of vehicles in the beginning of the zone is small. Drivers tend handle the design of the transition zones in a cautious and responsible manner. The traffic safety effect on severe accidents was expected to be high on 2 + 1 road with cable barrier. So far in eight objects total length there has not been any fatal and only 6 persons with severe injuries. This is about 60% less than on ordinary semi-motorways and supports the prediction that fatal and severe injuries can be reduced with up to 50%. Median cable barrier crashes are very frequent but normally without person injuries. They are often caused by skidding, flat tire or loss of control. A number of possible severe accidents have been converted by means of the median cable barrier to crashes with slight or no injuries. Driver attitude surveys show that drivers attitude to roads with cable barrier have been changed in a positive direction. About 40% of the drivers say it is the best design. General survey shows that about 76% say that they want all major roads to have median barrier. The maintenance costs are increased with about 120 Thousand SEK (12000 USD) per km per year. The main costs are cable repairs with 80 Thousand SEK (8000 USD) per km per year. Work zone safety at cable barrier repairs is a major concern. © Woodhead Publishing 2003 |
abstractGer |
Abstract The objective of this paper is to present the Swedish Vision Zero Experience concerning separating car traffic with cable barriers and upgrading traffic safety on existing 13 m roads using low cost measures. There is a significant difference in traffic performance, safety, investment and maintenance costs, land requirement and intrusion between normal two-lane and four-lane cross-sections. In Sweden, this gap has been narrowed with a 13 m road with 3.75 m traffic lanes and 2.75 m hard shoulders. The traffic performance of these roads is quite satisfactory but there are safety problems with fatal accidents. The main problem on all two-lane roads is run-off road and head-on accidents causing more than 66% of all fatalities. The event process tends to be the same. The driver loses control for some reason and crashes against some obstacle in the roadside area or opposing vehicle. In 1998, the Director General of SNRA decided on a full-scale programme to improve traffic safety on six existing 13 m roads using low-cost measures, preferably within the existing right-of-way. The main alternative is the 2+1 solution with a separating cable barrier, preferably within the existing 13 m width. This solution was estimated to have a potential to prevent some 50% of all severe link accidents. Findings so far have been so successful that SNRA has decided to generally replace the old 13 m roads with the 2 + 1 solution. The main results and findings up to May 2001 are as follows: Level-of-service for normal traffic is better than expected. Speed performance on 2 + 1 roads with cable barrier is the same, or even better than an ordinary semi-motorway at one directional flows up to 1 400 v/h. The capacity is estimated to be about 1 650 v/h in one direction, some 300 v/h less than for an ordinary 13 m road. Emergency and tow agencies are complaining as their workload have increased. The transition zones from 2 to 1 lane have performed well. The proportion of vehicles in the beginning of the zone is small. Drivers tend handle the design of the transition zones in a cautious and responsible manner. The traffic safety effect on severe accidents was expected to be high on 2 + 1 road with cable barrier. So far in eight objects total length there has not been any fatal and only 6 persons with severe injuries. This is about 60% less than on ordinary semi-motorways and supports the prediction that fatal and severe injuries can be reduced with up to 50%. Median cable barrier crashes are very frequent but normally without person injuries. They are often caused by skidding, flat tire or loss of control. A number of possible severe accidents have been converted by means of the median cable barrier to crashes with slight or no injuries. Driver attitude surveys show that drivers attitude to roads with cable barrier have been changed in a positive direction. About 40% of the drivers say it is the best design. General survey shows that about 76% say that they want all major roads to have median barrier. The maintenance costs are increased with about 120 Thousand SEK (12000 USD) per km per year. The main costs are cable repairs with 80 Thousand SEK (8000 USD) per km per year. Work zone safety at cable barrier repairs is a major concern. © Woodhead Publishing 2003 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract The objective of this paper is to present the Swedish Vision Zero Experience concerning separating car traffic with cable barriers and upgrading traffic safety on existing 13 m roads using low cost measures. There is a significant difference in traffic performance, safety, investment and maintenance costs, land requirement and intrusion between normal two-lane and four-lane cross-sections. In Sweden, this gap has been narrowed with a 13 m road with 3.75 m traffic lanes and 2.75 m hard shoulders. The traffic performance of these roads is quite satisfactory but there are safety problems with fatal accidents. The main problem on all two-lane roads is run-off road and head-on accidents causing more than 66% of all fatalities. The event process tends to be the same. The driver loses control for some reason and crashes against some obstacle in the roadside area or opposing vehicle. In 1998, the Director General of SNRA decided on a full-scale programme to improve traffic safety on six existing 13 m roads using low-cost measures, preferably within the existing right-of-way. The main alternative is the 2+1 solution with a separating cable barrier, preferably within the existing 13 m width. This solution was estimated to have a potential to prevent some 50% of all severe link accidents. Findings so far have been so successful that SNRA has decided to generally replace the old 13 m roads with the 2 + 1 solution. The main results and findings up to May 2001 are as follows: Level-of-service for normal traffic is better than expected. Speed performance on 2 + 1 roads with cable barrier is the same, or even better than an ordinary semi-motorway at one directional flows up to 1 400 v/h. The capacity is estimated to be about 1 650 v/h in one direction, some 300 v/h less than for an ordinary 13 m road. Emergency and tow agencies are complaining as their workload have increased. The transition zones from 2 to 1 lane have performed well. The proportion of vehicles in the beginning of the zone is small. Drivers tend handle the design of the transition zones in a cautious and responsible manner. The traffic safety effect on severe accidents was expected to be high on 2 + 1 road with cable barrier. So far in eight objects total length there has not been any fatal and only 6 persons with severe injuries. This is about 60% less than on ordinary semi-motorways and supports the prediction that fatal and severe injuries can be reduced with up to 50%. Median cable barrier crashes are very frequent but normally without person injuries. They are often caused by skidding, flat tire or loss of control. A number of possible severe accidents have been converted by means of the median cable barrier to crashes with slight or no injuries. Driver attitude surveys show that drivers attitude to roads with cable barrier have been changed in a positive direction. About 40% of the drivers say it is the best design. General survey shows that about 76% say that they want all major roads to have median barrier. The maintenance costs are increased with about 120 Thousand SEK (12000 USD) per km per year. The main costs are cable repairs with 80 Thousand SEK (8000 USD) per km per year. Work zone safety at cable barrier repairs is a major concern. © Woodhead Publishing 2003 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_70 |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
Swedish vision zero experience |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1533/ijcr.2003.0224 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Carlsson, A Larsson, M |
author2Str |
Carlsson, A Larsson, M |
ppnlink |
219199949 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1533/ijcr.2003.0224 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T03:21:09.376Z |
_version_ |
1803617062759694336 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2076432833</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503074417.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2003 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1533/ijcr.2003.0224</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2076432833</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)ijcr.2003.0224-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">510</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bergh, T</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Swedish vision zero experience</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Woodhead Publishing 2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The objective of this paper is to present the Swedish Vision Zero Experience concerning separating car traffic with cable barriers and upgrading traffic safety on existing 13 m roads using low cost measures. There is a significant difference in traffic performance, safety, investment and maintenance costs, land requirement and intrusion between normal two-lane and four-lane cross-sections. In Sweden, this gap has been narrowed with a 13 m road with 3.75 m traffic lanes and 2.75 m hard shoulders. The traffic performance of these roads is quite satisfactory but there are safety problems with fatal accidents. The main problem on all two-lane roads is run-off road and head-on accidents causing more than 66% of all fatalities. The event process tends to be the same. The driver loses control for some reason and crashes against some obstacle in the roadside area or opposing vehicle. In 1998, the Director General of SNRA decided on a full-scale programme to improve traffic safety on six existing 13 m roads using low-cost measures, preferably within the existing right-of-way. The main alternative is the 2+1 solution with a separating cable barrier, preferably within the existing 13 m width. This solution was estimated to have a potential to prevent some 50% of all severe link accidents. Findings so far have been so successful that SNRA has decided to generally replace the old 13 m roads with the 2 + 1 solution. The main results and findings up to May 2001 are as follows: Level-of-service for normal traffic is better than expected. Speed performance on 2 + 1 roads with cable barrier is the same, or even better than an ordinary semi-motorway at one directional flows up to 1 400 v/h. The capacity is estimated to be about 1 650 v/h in one direction, some 300 v/h less than for an ordinary 13 m road. Emergency and tow agencies are complaining as their workload have increased. The transition zones from 2 to 1 lane have performed well. The proportion of vehicles in the beginning of the zone is small. Drivers tend handle the design of the transition zones in a cautious and responsible manner. The traffic safety effect on severe accidents was expected to be high on 2 + 1 road with cable barrier. So far in eight objects total length there has not been any fatal and only 6 persons with severe injuries. This is about 60% less than on ordinary semi-motorways and supports the prediction that fatal and severe injuries can be reduced with up to 50%. Median cable barrier crashes are very frequent but normally without person injuries. They are often caused by skidding, flat tire or loss of control. A number of possible severe accidents have been converted by means of the median cable barrier to crashes with slight or no injuries. Driver attitude surveys show that drivers attitude to roads with cable barrier have been changed in a positive direction. About 40% of the drivers say it is the best design. General survey shows that about 76% say that they want all major roads to have median barrier. The maintenance costs are increased with about 120 Thousand SEK (12000 USD) per km per year. The main costs are cable repairs with 80 Thousand SEK (8000 USD) per km per year. Work zone safety at cable barrier repairs is a major concern.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Traffic Safety</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Severe Accident</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fatal Accident</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Land Requirement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Traffic Lane</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Carlsson, A</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Larsson, M</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of crashworthiness</subfield><subfield code="d">Woodhead Publishing, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2003), 2 vom: Jan., Seite 159-167</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)219199949</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1352959-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)9219199947</subfield><subfield code="x">1358-8265</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2003</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:159-167</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1533/ijcr.2003.0224</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2003</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">159-167</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.402916 |