Worldly imprecision
Abstract Physical theories often characterize their observables with real number precision. Many non-fundamental theories do so needlessly: they are more precise than they need to be to capture the physical matters of fact about their observables. A natural expectation is that a truly fundamental th...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Miller, Michael E. [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2020 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Springer Nature B.V. 2020 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Philosophical studies - Springer Netherlands, 1950, 178(2020), 9 vom: 25. Nov., Seite 2895-2911 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:178 ; year:2020 ; number:9 ; day:25 ; month:11 ; pages:2895-2911 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11098-020-01591-z |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC2077026685 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2077026685 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230505134333.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 221220s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11098-020-01591-z |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2077026685 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s11098-020-01591-z-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 100 |q VZ |
084 | |a 5,1 |2 ssgn | ||
084 | |a PHILOS |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
084 | |a LING |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
100 | 1 | |a Miller, Michael E. |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0003-1144-9711 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Worldly imprecision |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 | ||
520 | |a Abstract Physical theories often characterize their observables with real number precision. Many non-fundamental theories do so needlessly: they are more precise than they need to be to capture the physical matters of fact about their observables. A natural expectation is that a truly fundamental theory will require its full precision in order to exhaustively capture all of the fundamental physical matters of fact. I argue against this expectation and I show that we do not have good reason to expect that the standard of precision set by successful theories, or even by a truly fundamental theory, will match the granularity of the physical facts. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Precision | |
650 | 4 | |a Quantities | |
650 | 4 | |a Empirical success | |
650 | 4 | |a Fundamentality | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Philosophical studies |d Springer Netherlands, 1950 |g 178(2020), 9 vom: 25. Nov., Seite 2895-2911 |w (DE-627)129094803 |w (DE-600)7320-9 |w (DE-576)014430851 |x 0031-8116 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:178 |g year:2020 |g number:9 |g day:25 |g month:11 |g pages:2895-2911 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01591-z |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a FID-PHILOS | ||
912 | |a FID-LING | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHI | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 178 |j 2020 |e 9 |b 25 |c 11 |h 2895-2911 |
author_variant |
m e m me mem |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:00318116:2020----::ollipe |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
publishDate |
2020 |
allfields |
10.1007/s11098-020-01591-z doi (DE-627)OLC2077026685 (DE-He213)s11098-020-01591-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 VZ 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid LING DE-30 fid Miller, Michael E. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1144-9711 aut Worldly imprecision 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract Physical theories often characterize their observables with real number precision. Many non-fundamental theories do so needlessly: they are more precise than they need to be to capture the physical matters of fact about their observables. A natural expectation is that a truly fundamental theory will require its full precision in order to exhaustively capture all of the fundamental physical matters of fact. I argue against this expectation and I show that we do not have good reason to expect that the standard of precision set by successful theories, or even by a truly fundamental theory, will match the granularity of the physical facts. Precision Quantities Empirical success Fundamentality Enthalten in Philosophical studies Springer Netherlands, 1950 178(2020), 9 vom: 25. Nov., Seite 2895-2911 (DE-627)129094803 (DE-600)7320-9 (DE-576)014430851 0031-8116 nnns volume:178 year:2020 number:9 day:25 month:11 pages:2895-2911 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01591-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 178 2020 9 25 11 2895-2911 |
spelling |
10.1007/s11098-020-01591-z doi (DE-627)OLC2077026685 (DE-He213)s11098-020-01591-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 VZ 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid LING DE-30 fid Miller, Michael E. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1144-9711 aut Worldly imprecision 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract Physical theories often characterize their observables with real number precision. Many non-fundamental theories do so needlessly: they are more precise than they need to be to capture the physical matters of fact about their observables. A natural expectation is that a truly fundamental theory will require its full precision in order to exhaustively capture all of the fundamental physical matters of fact. I argue against this expectation and I show that we do not have good reason to expect that the standard of precision set by successful theories, or even by a truly fundamental theory, will match the granularity of the physical facts. Precision Quantities Empirical success Fundamentality Enthalten in Philosophical studies Springer Netherlands, 1950 178(2020), 9 vom: 25. Nov., Seite 2895-2911 (DE-627)129094803 (DE-600)7320-9 (DE-576)014430851 0031-8116 nnns volume:178 year:2020 number:9 day:25 month:11 pages:2895-2911 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01591-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 178 2020 9 25 11 2895-2911 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11098-020-01591-z doi (DE-627)OLC2077026685 (DE-He213)s11098-020-01591-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 VZ 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid LING DE-30 fid Miller, Michael E. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1144-9711 aut Worldly imprecision 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract Physical theories often characterize their observables with real number precision. Many non-fundamental theories do so needlessly: they are more precise than they need to be to capture the physical matters of fact about their observables. A natural expectation is that a truly fundamental theory will require its full precision in order to exhaustively capture all of the fundamental physical matters of fact. I argue against this expectation and I show that we do not have good reason to expect that the standard of precision set by successful theories, or even by a truly fundamental theory, will match the granularity of the physical facts. Precision Quantities Empirical success Fundamentality Enthalten in Philosophical studies Springer Netherlands, 1950 178(2020), 9 vom: 25. Nov., Seite 2895-2911 (DE-627)129094803 (DE-600)7320-9 (DE-576)014430851 0031-8116 nnns volume:178 year:2020 number:9 day:25 month:11 pages:2895-2911 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01591-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 178 2020 9 25 11 2895-2911 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11098-020-01591-z doi (DE-627)OLC2077026685 (DE-He213)s11098-020-01591-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 VZ 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid LING DE-30 fid Miller, Michael E. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1144-9711 aut Worldly imprecision 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract Physical theories often characterize their observables with real number precision. Many non-fundamental theories do so needlessly: they are more precise than they need to be to capture the physical matters of fact about their observables. A natural expectation is that a truly fundamental theory will require its full precision in order to exhaustively capture all of the fundamental physical matters of fact. I argue against this expectation and I show that we do not have good reason to expect that the standard of precision set by successful theories, or even by a truly fundamental theory, will match the granularity of the physical facts. Precision Quantities Empirical success Fundamentality Enthalten in Philosophical studies Springer Netherlands, 1950 178(2020), 9 vom: 25. Nov., Seite 2895-2911 (DE-627)129094803 (DE-600)7320-9 (DE-576)014430851 0031-8116 nnns volume:178 year:2020 number:9 day:25 month:11 pages:2895-2911 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01591-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 178 2020 9 25 11 2895-2911 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11098-020-01591-z doi (DE-627)OLC2077026685 (DE-He213)s11098-020-01591-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 VZ 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid LING DE-30 fid Miller, Michael E. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1144-9711 aut Worldly imprecision 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract Physical theories often characterize their observables with real number precision. Many non-fundamental theories do so needlessly: they are more precise than they need to be to capture the physical matters of fact about their observables. A natural expectation is that a truly fundamental theory will require its full precision in order to exhaustively capture all of the fundamental physical matters of fact. I argue against this expectation and I show that we do not have good reason to expect that the standard of precision set by successful theories, or even by a truly fundamental theory, will match the granularity of the physical facts. Precision Quantities Empirical success Fundamentality Enthalten in Philosophical studies Springer Netherlands, 1950 178(2020), 9 vom: 25. Nov., Seite 2895-2911 (DE-627)129094803 (DE-600)7320-9 (DE-576)014430851 0031-8116 nnns volume:178 year:2020 number:9 day:25 month:11 pages:2895-2911 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01591-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 178 2020 9 25 11 2895-2911 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Philosophical studies 178(2020), 9 vom: 25. Nov., Seite 2895-2911 volume:178 year:2020 number:9 day:25 month:11 pages:2895-2911 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Philosophical studies 178(2020), 9 vom: 25. Nov., Seite 2895-2911 volume:178 year:2020 number:9 day:25 month:11 pages:2895-2911 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Precision Quantities Empirical success Fundamentality |
dewey-raw |
100 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Philosophical studies |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Miller, Michael E. @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-11-25T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
129094803 |
dewey-sort |
3100 |
id |
OLC2077026685 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2077026685</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230505134333.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221220s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11098-020-01591-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2077026685</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11098-020-01591-z-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHILOS</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Miller, Michael E.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-1144-9711</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Worldly imprecision</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Nature B.V. 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Physical theories often characterize their observables with real number precision. Many non-fundamental theories do so needlessly: they are more precise than they need to be to capture the physical matters of fact about their observables. A natural expectation is that a truly fundamental theory will require its full precision in order to exhaustively capture all of the fundamental physical matters of fact. I argue against this expectation and I show that we do not have good reason to expect that the standard of precision set by successful theories, or even by a truly fundamental theory, will match the granularity of the physical facts.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Precision</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Quantities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Empirical success</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fundamentality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Philosophical studies</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1950</subfield><subfield code="g">178(2020), 9 vom: 25. Nov., Seite 2895-2911</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129094803</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)7320-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014430851</subfield><subfield code="x">0031-8116</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:178</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:9</subfield><subfield code="g">day:25</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2895-2911</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01591-z</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHILOS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">178</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">9</subfield><subfield code="b">25</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">2895-2911</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Miller, Michael E. |
spellingShingle |
Miller, Michael E. ddc 100 ssgn 5,1 fid PHILOS fid LING misc Precision misc Quantities misc Empirical success misc Fundamentality Worldly imprecision |
authorStr |
Miller, Michael E. |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129094803 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
100 - Philosophy & psychology |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0031-8116 |
topic_title |
100 VZ 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid LING DE-30 fid Worldly imprecision Precision Quantities Empirical success Fundamentality |
topic |
ddc 100 ssgn 5,1 fid PHILOS fid LING misc Precision misc Quantities misc Empirical success misc Fundamentality |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 100 ssgn 5,1 fid PHILOS fid LING misc Precision misc Quantities misc Empirical success misc Fundamentality |
topic_browse |
ddc 100 ssgn 5,1 fid PHILOS fid LING misc Precision misc Quantities misc Empirical success misc Fundamentality |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Philosophical studies |
hierarchy_parent_id |
129094803 |
dewey-tens |
100 - Philosophy |
hierarchy_top_title |
Philosophical studies |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129094803 (DE-600)7320-9 (DE-576)014430851 |
title |
Worldly imprecision |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2077026685 (DE-He213)s11098-020-01591-z-p |
title_full |
Worldly imprecision |
author_sort |
Miller, Michael E. |
journal |
Philosophical studies |
journalStr |
Philosophical studies |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
100 - Philosophy & psychology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2020 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
2895 |
author_browse |
Miller, Michael E. |
container_volume |
178 |
class |
100 VZ 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid LING DE-30 fid |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Miller, Michael E. |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11098-020-01591-z |
normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0003-1144-9711 |
normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0003-1144-9711 |
dewey-full |
100 |
title_sort |
worldly imprecision |
title_auth |
Worldly imprecision |
abstract |
Abstract Physical theories often characterize their observables with real number precision. Many non-fundamental theories do so needlessly: they are more precise than they need to be to capture the physical matters of fact about their observables. A natural expectation is that a truly fundamental theory will require its full precision in order to exhaustively capture all of the fundamental physical matters of fact. I argue against this expectation and I show that we do not have good reason to expect that the standard of precision set by successful theories, or even by a truly fundamental theory, will match the granularity of the physical facts. © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 |
abstractGer |
Abstract Physical theories often characterize their observables with real number precision. Many non-fundamental theories do so needlessly: they are more precise than they need to be to capture the physical matters of fact about their observables. A natural expectation is that a truly fundamental theory will require its full precision in order to exhaustively capture all of the fundamental physical matters of fact. I argue against this expectation and I show that we do not have good reason to expect that the standard of precision set by successful theories, or even by a truly fundamental theory, will match the granularity of the physical facts. © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Physical theories often characterize their observables with real number precision. Many non-fundamental theories do so needlessly: they are more precise than they need to be to capture the physical matters of fact about their observables. A natural expectation is that a truly fundamental theory will require its full precision in order to exhaustively capture all of the fundamental physical matters of fact. I argue against this expectation and I show that we do not have good reason to expect that the standard of precision set by successful theories, or even by a truly fundamental theory, will match the granularity of the physical facts. © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_4012 |
container_issue |
9 |
title_short |
Worldly imprecision |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01591-z |
remote_bool |
false |
ppnlink |
129094803 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s11098-020-01591-z |
up_date |
2024-07-03T13:18:07.459Z |
_version_ |
1803564023767105536 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2077026685</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230505134333.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221220s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11098-020-01591-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2077026685</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11098-020-01591-z-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHILOS</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Miller, Michael E.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-1144-9711</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Worldly imprecision</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Nature B.V. 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Physical theories often characterize their observables with real number precision. Many non-fundamental theories do so needlessly: they are more precise than they need to be to capture the physical matters of fact about their observables. A natural expectation is that a truly fundamental theory will require its full precision in order to exhaustively capture all of the fundamental physical matters of fact. I argue against this expectation and I show that we do not have good reason to expect that the standard of precision set by successful theories, or even by a truly fundamental theory, will match the granularity of the physical facts.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Precision</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Quantities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Empirical success</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fundamentality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Philosophical studies</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1950</subfield><subfield code="g">178(2020), 9 vom: 25. Nov., Seite 2895-2911</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129094803</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)7320-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014430851</subfield><subfield code="x">0031-8116</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:178</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:9</subfield><subfield code="g">day:25</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2895-2911</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01591-z</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHILOS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">178</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">9</subfield><subfield code="b">25</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">2895-2911</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.401454 |