On the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire
Abstract In this paper I explore the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire. I have in mind the range of practical reasons one might have to do such things as collect (additional) evidence, consult with various sources, employ certain methods or techniques, double-check one’s answer...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Goldberg, Sanford C. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Nature B.V. 2020 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Synthese - Springer Netherlands, 1936, 199(2020), 1-2 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 1641-1658 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:199 ; year:2020 ; number:1-2 ; day:30 ; month:09 ; pages:1641-1658 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11229-020-02833-7 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2077474718 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2077474718 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230514105524.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 221220s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11229-020-02833-7 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2077474718 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s11229-020-02833-7-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 400 |a 150 |a 300 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 5,2 |a 7,11 |a 11 |a 5,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a LING |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Goldberg, Sanford C. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a On the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract In this paper I explore the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire. I have in mind the range of practical reasons one might have to do such things as collect (additional) evidence, consult with various sources, employ certain methods or techniques, double-check one’s answer to a question, etc. After expanding the diet of examples in which subjects have such reasons, I appeal to features of these sorts of reason in order to question the motivation for pragmatic encroachment in epistemology. Once we reject pragmatic encroachment, it can seem that we are forced to treat practical reasons to inquire as having no distinctly epistemic significance. This is not so; I conclude by sketching an alternative account of what the epistemic significance of such reasons might be. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Pragmatic encroachment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Practical reasons | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Inquiry | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Defeater | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Normative defeat | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Synthese |d Springer Netherlands, 1936 |g 199(2020), 1-2 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 1641-1658 |w (DE-627)129479187 |w (DE-600)204075-X |w (DE-576)014860856 |x 0039-7857 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:199 |g year:2020 |g number:1-2 |g day:30 |g month:09 |g pages:1641-1658 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02833-7 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a FID-LING | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHY | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-CHE | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHI | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 199 |j 2020 |e 1-2 |b 30 |c 09 |h 1641-1658 | ||
| author_variant |
s c g sc scg |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00397857:2020----::nheitmcinfcnefrciar |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s11229-020-02833-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2077474718 (DE-He213)s11229-020-02833-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 400 150 300 VZ 5,2 7,11 11 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid Goldberg, Sanford C. verfasserin aut On the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract In this paper I explore the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire. I have in mind the range of practical reasons one might have to do such things as collect (additional) evidence, consult with various sources, employ certain methods or techniques, double-check one’s answer to a question, etc. After expanding the diet of examples in which subjects have such reasons, I appeal to features of these sorts of reason in order to question the motivation for pragmatic encroachment in epistemology. Once we reject pragmatic encroachment, it can seem that we are forced to treat practical reasons to inquire as having no distinctly epistemic significance. This is not so; I conclude by sketching an alternative account of what the epistemic significance of such reasons might be. Pragmatic encroachment Practical reasons Inquiry Defeater Normative defeat Enthalten in Synthese Springer Netherlands, 1936 199(2020), 1-2 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 1641-1658 (DE-627)129479187 (DE-600)204075-X (DE-576)014860856 0039-7857 nnns volume:199 year:2020 number:1-2 day:30 month:09 pages:1641-1658 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02833-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 199 2020 1-2 30 09 1641-1658 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s11229-020-02833-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2077474718 (DE-He213)s11229-020-02833-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 400 150 300 VZ 5,2 7,11 11 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid Goldberg, Sanford C. verfasserin aut On the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract In this paper I explore the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire. I have in mind the range of practical reasons one might have to do such things as collect (additional) evidence, consult with various sources, employ certain methods or techniques, double-check one’s answer to a question, etc. After expanding the diet of examples in which subjects have such reasons, I appeal to features of these sorts of reason in order to question the motivation for pragmatic encroachment in epistemology. Once we reject pragmatic encroachment, it can seem that we are forced to treat practical reasons to inquire as having no distinctly epistemic significance. This is not so; I conclude by sketching an alternative account of what the epistemic significance of such reasons might be. Pragmatic encroachment Practical reasons Inquiry Defeater Normative defeat Enthalten in Synthese Springer Netherlands, 1936 199(2020), 1-2 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 1641-1658 (DE-627)129479187 (DE-600)204075-X (DE-576)014860856 0039-7857 nnns volume:199 year:2020 number:1-2 day:30 month:09 pages:1641-1658 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02833-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 199 2020 1-2 30 09 1641-1658 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11229-020-02833-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2077474718 (DE-He213)s11229-020-02833-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 400 150 300 VZ 5,2 7,11 11 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid Goldberg, Sanford C. verfasserin aut On the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract In this paper I explore the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire. I have in mind the range of practical reasons one might have to do such things as collect (additional) evidence, consult with various sources, employ certain methods or techniques, double-check one’s answer to a question, etc. After expanding the diet of examples in which subjects have such reasons, I appeal to features of these sorts of reason in order to question the motivation for pragmatic encroachment in epistemology. Once we reject pragmatic encroachment, it can seem that we are forced to treat practical reasons to inquire as having no distinctly epistemic significance. This is not so; I conclude by sketching an alternative account of what the epistemic significance of such reasons might be. Pragmatic encroachment Practical reasons Inquiry Defeater Normative defeat Enthalten in Synthese Springer Netherlands, 1936 199(2020), 1-2 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 1641-1658 (DE-627)129479187 (DE-600)204075-X (DE-576)014860856 0039-7857 nnns volume:199 year:2020 number:1-2 day:30 month:09 pages:1641-1658 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02833-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 199 2020 1-2 30 09 1641-1658 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11229-020-02833-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2077474718 (DE-He213)s11229-020-02833-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 400 150 300 VZ 5,2 7,11 11 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid Goldberg, Sanford C. verfasserin aut On the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract In this paper I explore the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire. I have in mind the range of practical reasons one might have to do such things as collect (additional) evidence, consult with various sources, employ certain methods or techniques, double-check one’s answer to a question, etc. After expanding the diet of examples in which subjects have such reasons, I appeal to features of these sorts of reason in order to question the motivation for pragmatic encroachment in epistemology. Once we reject pragmatic encroachment, it can seem that we are forced to treat practical reasons to inquire as having no distinctly epistemic significance. This is not so; I conclude by sketching an alternative account of what the epistemic significance of such reasons might be. Pragmatic encroachment Practical reasons Inquiry Defeater Normative defeat Enthalten in Synthese Springer Netherlands, 1936 199(2020), 1-2 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 1641-1658 (DE-627)129479187 (DE-600)204075-X (DE-576)014860856 0039-7857 nnns volume:199 year:2020 number:1-2 day:30 month:09 pages:1641-1658 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02833-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 199 2020 1-2 30 09 1641-1658 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11229-020-02833-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2077474718 (DE-He213)s11229-020-02833-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 400 150 300 VZ 5,2 7,11 11 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid Goldberg, Sanford C. verfasserin aut On the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract In this paper I explore the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire. I have in mind the range of practical reasons one might have to do such things as collect (additional) evidence, consult with various sources, employ certain methods or techniques, double-check one’s answer to a question, etc. After expanding the diet of examples in which subjects have such reasons, I appeal to features of these sorts of reason in order to question the motivation for pragmatic encroachment in epistemology. Once we reject pragmatic encroachment, it can seem that we are forced to treat practical reasons to inquire as having no distinctly epistemic significance. This is not so; I conclude by sketching an alternative account of what the epistemic significance of such reasons might be. Pragmatic encroachment Practical reasons Inquiry Defeater Normative defeat Enthalten in Synthese Springer Netherlands, 1936 199(2020), 1-2 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 1641-1658 (DE-627)129479187 (DE-600)204075-X (DE-576)014860856 0039-7857 nnns volume:199 year:2020 number:1-2 day:30 month:09 pages:1641-1658 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02833-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 199 2020 1-2 30 09 1641-1658 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Synthese 199(2020), 1-2 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 1641-1658 volume:199 year:2020 number:1-2 day:30 month:09 pages:1641-1658 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Synthese 199(2020), 1-2 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 1641-1658 volume:199 year:2020 number:1-2 day:30 month:09 pages:1641-1658 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Pragmatic encroachment Practical reasons Inquiry Defeater Normative defeat |
| dewey-raw |
400 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Synthese |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Goldberg, Sanford C. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-09-30T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
129479187 |
| dewey-sort |
3400 |
| id |
OLC2077474718 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2077474718</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230514105524.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221220s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11229-020-02833-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2077474718</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11229-020-02833-7-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">400</subfield><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,2</subfield><subfield code="a">7,11</subfield><subfield code="a">11</subfield><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Goldberg, Sanford C.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">On the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Nature B.V. 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract In this paper I explore the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire. I have in mind the range of practical reasons one might have to do such things as collect (additional) evidence, consult with various sources, employ certain methods or techniques, double-check one’s answer to a question, etc. After expanding the diet of examples in which subjects have such reasons, I appeal to features of these sorts of reason in order to question the motivation for pragmatic encroachment in epistemology. Once we reject pragmatic encroachment, it can seem that we are forced to treat practical reasons to inquire as having no distinctly epistemic significance. This is not so; I conclude by sketching an alternative account of what the epistemic significance of such reasons might be.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pragmatic encroachment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Practical reasons</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Inquiry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Defeater</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Normative defeat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Synthese</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1936</subfield><subfield code="g">199(2020), 1-2 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 1641-1658</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129479187</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)204075-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014860856</subfield><subfield code="x">0039-7857</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:199</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1-2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:30</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1641-1658</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02833-7</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">199</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">1-2</subfield><subfield code="b">30</subfield><subfield code="c">09</subfield><subfield code="h">1641-1658</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Goldberg, Sanford C. |
| spellingShingle |
Goldberg, Sanford C. ddc 400 ssgn 5,2 fid LING misc Pragmatic encroachment misc Practical reasons misc Inquiry misc Defeater misc Normative defeat On the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire |
| authorStr |
Goldberg, Sanford C. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129479187 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
400 - Language 150 - Psychology 300 - Social sciences |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0039-7857 |
| topic_title |
400 150 300 VZ 5,2 7,11 11 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid On the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire Pragmatic encroachment Practical reasons Inquiry Defeater Normative defeat |
| topic |
ddc 400 ssgn 5,2 fid LING misc Pragmatic encroachment misc Practical reasons misc Inquiry misc Defeater misc Normative defeat |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 400 ssgn 5,2 fid LING misc Pragmatic encroachment misc Practical reasons misc Inquiry misc Defeater misc Normative defeat |
| topic_browse |
ddc 400 ssgn 5,2 fid LING misc Pragmatic encroachment misc Practical reasons misc Inquiry misc Defeater misc Normative defeat |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Synthese |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
129479187 |
| dewey-tens |
400 - Language 150 - Psychology 300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Synthese |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129479187 (DE-600)204075-X (DE-576)014860856 |
| title |
On the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2077474718 (DE-He213)s11229-020-02833-7-p |
| title_full |
On the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire |
| author_sort |
Goldberg, Sanford C. |
| journal |
Synthese |
| journalStr |
Synthese |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
400 - Language 100 - Philosophy & psychology 300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1641 |
| author_browse |
Goldberg, Sanford C. |
| container_volume |
199 |
| class |
400 150 300 VZ 5,2 7,11 11 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Goldberg, Sanford C. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11229-020-02833-7 |
| dewey-full |
400 150 300 |
| title_sort |
on the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire |
| title_auth |
On the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire |
| abstract |
Abstract In this paper I explore the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire. I have in mind the range of practical reasons one might have to do such things as collect (additional) evidence, consult with various sources, employ certain methods or techniques, double-check one’s answer to a question, etc. After expanding the diet of examples in which subjects have such reasons, I appeal to features of these sorts of reason in order to question the motivation for pragmatic encroachment in epistemology. Once we reject pragmatic encroachment, it can seem that we are forced to treat practical reasons to inquire as having no distinctly epistemic significance. This is not so; I conclude by sketching an alternative account of what the epistemic significance of such reasons might be. © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract In this paper I explore the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire. I have in mind the range of practical reasons one might have to do such things as collect (additional) evidence, consult with various sources, employ certain methods or techniques, double-check one’s answer to a question, etc. After expanding the diet of examples in which subjects have such reasons, I appeal to features of these sorts of reason in order to question the motivation for pragmatic encroachment in epistemology. Once we reject pragmatic encroachment, it can seem that we are forced to treat practical reasons to inquire as having no distinctly epistemic significance. This is not so; I conclude by sketching an alternative account of what the epistemic significance of such reasons might be. © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract In this paper I explore the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire. I have in mind the range of practical reasons one might have to do such things as collect (additional) evidence, consult with various sources, employ certain methods or techniques, double-check one’s answer to a question, etc. After expanding the diet of examples in which subjects have such reasons, I appeal to features of these sorts of reason in order to question the motivation for pragmatic encroachment in epistemology. Once we reject pragmatic encroachment, it can seem that we are forced to treat practical reasons to inquire as having no distinctly epistemic significance. This is not so; I conclude by sketching an alternative account of what the epistemic significance of such reasons might be. © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_4012 |
| container_issue |
1-2 |
| title_short |
On the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02833-7 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
129479187 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s11229-020-02833-7 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T15:45:46.104Z |
| _version_ |
1803573312747470851 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2077474718</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230514105524.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221220s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11229-020-02833-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2077474718</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11229-020-02833-7-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">400</subfield><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,2</subfield><subfield code="a">7,11</subfield><subfield code="a">11</subfield><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Goldberg, Sanford C.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">On the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Nature B.V. 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract In this paper I explore the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire. I have in mind the range of practical reasons one might have to do such things as collect (additional) evidence, consult with various sources, employ certain methods or techniques, double-check one’s answer to a question, etc. After expanding the diet of examples in which subjects have such reasons, I appeal to features of these sorts of reason in order to question the motivation for pragmatic encroachment in epistemology. Once we reject pragmatic encroachment, it can seem that we are forced to treat practical reasons to inquire as having no distinctly epistemic significance. This is not so; I conclude by sketching an alternative account of what the epistemic significance of such reasons might be.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pragmatic encroachment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Practical reasons</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Inquiry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Defeater</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Normative defeat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Synthese</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1936</subfield><subfield code="g">199(2020), 1-2 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 1641-1658</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129479187</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)204075-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014860856</subfield><subfield code="x">0039-7857</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:199</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1-2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:30</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1641-1658</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02833-7</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">199</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">1-2</subfield><subfield code="b">30</subfield><subfield code="c">09</subfield><subfield code="h">1641-1658</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399703 |