Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems: a meta-analysis
Abstract Despite the large body of research surrounding crop growth parameters, there is still a lack of systematic assessments on how harvestable yields of different crop types respond to varying levels of shading. However, with the advent of agrivoltaic systems, a technology that combines energy a...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Laub, Moritz [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2022 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Agronomy for sustainable development - Springer Paris, 2005, 42(2022), 3 vom: 01. Juni |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:42 ; year:2022 ; number:3 ; day:01 ; month:06 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2078821284 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2078821284 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230517102405.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 221220s2022 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2078821284 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s13593-022-00783-7-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 580 |a 630 |a 640 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 12 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Laub, Moritz |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems: a meta-analysis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s) 2022 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Despite the large body of research surrounding crop growth parameters, there is still a lack of systematic assessments on how harvestable yields of different crop types respond to varying levels of shading. However, with the advent of agrivoltaic systems, a technology that combines energy and food production, shade tolerance of cropping systems is becoming increasingly important. To address this research gap, a meta-analysis with data from two experimental approaches (intercropping and artificial shading with cloths, nets or solar panels) was performed. The aim was to quantitatively assess the susceptibility of different temperate crop types to increasing levels of shading. Crop type specific yield response curves were developed as a function of reduction in solar radiation, estimating relative crop yields compared to the unshaded controls. Only studies that reported reduction in solar radiation and crop yield per area in temperate and subtropical areas were included. The results suggested a nonlinear relationship between achieved crop yields and reduction in solar radiation for all crop types. Most crops tolerate reduced solar radiation up to 15%, showing a less than proportional yield decline. However, significant differences between the response curves of the following crop types existed: Berries, fruits and fruity vegetables benefited from reduction in solar radiation up to 30%. Forages, leafy vegetables, tubers/root crops, and $ C_{3} $ cereals initially showed less than proportional crop yield loss. In contrast, maize and grain legumes experienced strong crop yield losses even at low shade levels. The results provide a set of initial indicators that may be used in assessing the suitability of crop types for shade systems, and thus for agrivoltaic or other dual land-use systems. Detailed yield response curves, as provided by this study, are valuable tools in optimizing the output of annual crop components in these systems. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Crop specific meta-analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Shading | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Agrivoltaics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Shade sensitivity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Shade tolerance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Crop yield | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pataczek, Lisa |0 (orcid)0000-0003-4206-7791 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Feuerbacher, Arndt |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zikeli, Sabine |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Högy, Petra |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Agronomy for sustainable development |d Springer Paris, 2005 |g 42(2022), 3 vom: 01. Juni |w (DE-627)483301795 |w (DE-600)2182736-9 |w (DE-576)116898356 |x 1774-0746 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:42 |g year:2022 |g number:3 |g day:01 |g month:06 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-FRK | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-FOR | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-ROK | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 42 |j 2022 |e 3 |b 01 |c 06 | ||
| author_variant |
m l ml l p lp a f af s z sz p h ph |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:17740746:2022----::otatnyedepneavrigeesfhdsgetifrnsiaiiyfrpfr |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2078821284 (DE-He213)s13593-022-00783-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 580 630 640 VZ 12 ssgn Laub, Moritz verfasserin aut Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems: a meta-analysis 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2022 Abstract Despite the large body of research surrounding crop growth parameters, there is still a lack of systematic assessments on how harvestable yields of different crop types respond to varying levels of shading. However, with the advent of agrivoltaic systems, a technology that combines energy and food production, shade tolerance of cropping systems is becoming increasingly important. To address this research gap, a meta-analysis with data from two experimental approaches (intercropping and artificial shading with cloths, nets or solar panels) was performed. The aim was to quantitatively assess the susceptibility of different temperate crop types to increasing levels of shading. Crop type specific yield response curves were developed as a function of reduction in solar radiation, estimating relative crop yields compared to the unshaded controls. Only studies that reported reduction in solar radiation and crop yield per area in temperate and subtropical areas were included. The results suggested a nonlinear relationship between achieved crop yields and reduction in solar radiation for all crop types. Most crops tolerate reduced solar radiation up to 15%, showing a less than proportional yield decline. However, significant differences between the response curves of the following crop types existed: Berries, fruits and fruity vegetables benefited from reduction in solar radiation up to 30%. Forages, leafy vegetables, tubers/root crops, and $ C_{3} $ cereals initially showed less than proportional crop yield loss. In contrast, maize and grain legumes experienced strong crop yield losses even at low shade levels. The results provide a set of initial indicators that may be used in assessing the suitability of crop types for shade systems, and thus for agrivoltaic or other dual land-use systems. Detailed yield response curves, as provided by this study, are valuable tools in optimizing the output of annual crop components in these systems. Crop specific meta-analysis Shading Agrivoltaics Shade sensitivity Shade tolerance Crop yield Pataczek, Lisa (orcid)0000-0003-4206-7791 aut Feuerbacher, Arndt aut Zikeli, Sabine aut Högy, Petra aut Enthalten in Agronomy for sustainable development Springer Paris, 2005 42(2022), 3 vom: 01. Juni (DE-627)483301795 (DE-600)2182736-9 (DE-576)116898356 1774-0746 nnns volume:42 year:2022 number:3 day:01 month:06 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FRK SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-ROK SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 AR 42 2022 3 01 06 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2078821284 (DE-He213)s13593-022-00783-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 580 630 640 VZ 12 ssgn Laub, Moritz verfasserin aut Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems: a meta-analysis 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2022 Abstract Despite the large body of research surrounding crop growth parameters, there is still a lack of systematic assessments on how harvestable yields of different crop types respond to varying levels of shading. However, with the advent of agrivoltaic systems, a technology that combines energy and food production, shade tolerance of cropping systems is becoming increasingly important. To address this research gap, a meta-analysis with data from two experimental approaches (intercropping and artificial shading with cloths, nets or solar panels) was performed. The aim was to quantitatively assess the susceptibility of different temperate crop types to increasing levels of shading. Crop type specific yield response curves were developed as a function of reduction in solar radiation, estimating relative crop yields compared to the unshaded controls. Only studies that reported reduction in solar radiation and crop yield per area in temperate and subtropical areas were included. The results suggested a nonlinear relationship between achieved crop yields and reduction in solar radiation for all crop types. Most crops tolerate reduced solar radiation up to 15%, showing a less than proportional yield decline. However, significant differences between the response curves of the following crop types existed: Berries, fruits and fruity vegetables benefited from reduction in solar radiation up to 30%. Forages, leafy vegetables, tubers/root crops, and $ C_{3} $ cereals initially showed less than proportional crop yield loss. In contrast, maize and grain legumes experienced strong crop yield losses even at low shade levels. The results provide a set of initial indicators that may be used in assessing the suitability of crop types for shade systems, and thus for agrivoltaic or other dual land-use systems. Detailed yield response curves, as provided by this study, are valuable tools in optimizing the output of annual crop components in these systems. Crop specific meta-analysis Shading Agrivoltaics Shade sensitivity Shade tolerance Crop yield Pataczek, Lisa (orcid)0000-0003-4206-7791 aut Feuerbacher, Arndt aut Zikeli, Sabine aut Högy, Petra aut Enthalten in Agronomy for sustainable development Springer Paris, 2005 42(2022), 3 vom: 01. Juni (DE-627)483301795 (DE-600)2182736-9 (DE-576)116898356 1774-0746 nnns volume:42 year:2022 number:3 day:01 month:06 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FRK SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-ROK SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 AR 42 2022 3 01 06 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2078821284 (DE-He213)s13593-022-00783-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 580 630 640 VZ 12 ssgn Laub, Moritz verfasserin aut Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems: a meta-analysis 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2022 Abstract Despite the large body of research surrounding crop growth parameters, there is still a lack of systematic assessments on how harvestable yields of different crop types respond to varying levels of shading. However, with the advent of agrivoltaic systems, a technology that combines energy and food production, shade tolerance of cropping systems is becoming increasingly important. To address this research gap, a meta-analysis with data from two experimental approaches (intercropping and artificial shading with cloths, nets or solar panels) was performed. The aim was to quantitatively assess the susceptibility of different temperate crop types to increasing levels of shading. Crop type specific yield response curves were developed as a function of reduction in solar radiation, estimating relative crop yields compared to the unshaded controls. Only studies that reported reduction in solar radiation and crop yield per area in temperate and subtropical areas were included. The results suggested a nonlinear relationship between achieved crop yields and reduction in solar radiation for all crop types. Most crops tolerate reduced solar radiation up to 15%, showing a less than proportional yield decline. However, significant differences between the response curves of the following crop types existed: Berries, fruits and fruity vegetables benefited from reduction in solar radiation up to 30%. Forages, leafy vegetables, tubers/root crops, and $ C_{3} $ cereals initially showed less than proportional crop yield loss. In contrast, maize and grain legumes experienced strong crop yield losses even at low shade levels. The results provide a set of initial indicators that may be used in assessing the suitability of crop types for shade systems, and thus for agrivoltaic or other dual land-use systems. Detailed yield response curves, as provided by this study, are valuable tools in optimizing the output of annual crop components in these systems. Crop specific meta-analysis Shading Agrivoltaics Shade sensitivity Shade tolerance Crop yield Pataczek, Lisa (orcid)0000-0003-4206-7791 aut Feuerbacher, Arndt aut Zikeli, Sabine aut Högy, Petra aut Enthalten in Agronomy for sustainable development Springer Paris, 2005 42(2022), 3 vom: 01. Juni (DE-627)483301795 (DE-600)2182736-9 (DE-576)116898356 1774-0746 nnns volume:42 year:2022 number:3 day:01 month:06 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FRK SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-ROK SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 AR 42 2022 3 01 06 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2078821284 (DE-He213)s13593-022-00783-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 580 630 640 VZ 12 ssgn Laub, Moritz verfasserin aut Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems: a meta-analysis 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2022 Abstract Despite the large body of research surrounding crop growth parameters, there is still a lack of systematic assessments on how harvestable yields of different crop types respond to varying levels of shading. However, with the advent of agrivoltaic systems, a technology that combines energy and food production, shade tolerance of cropping systems is becoming increasingly important. To address this research gap, a meta-analysis with data from two experimental approaches (intercropping and artificial shading with cloths, nets or solar panels) was performed. The aim was to quantitatively assess the susceptibility of different temperate crop types to increasing levels of shading. Crop type specific yield response curves were developed as a function of reduction in solar radiation, estimating relative crop yields compared to the unshaded controls. Only studies that reported reduction in solar radiation and crop yield per area in temperate and subtropical areas were included. The results suggested a nonlinear relationship between achieved crop yields and reduction in solar radiation for all crop types. Most crops tolerate reduced solar radiation up to 15%, showing a less than proportional yield decline. However, significant differences between the response curves of the following crop types existed: Berries, fruits and fruity vegetables benefited from reduction in solar radiation up to 30%. Forages, leafy vegetables, tubers/root crops, and $ C_{3} $ cereals initially showed less than proportional crop yield loss. In contrast, maize and grain legumes experienced strong crop yield losses even at low shade levels. The results provide a set of initial indicators that may be used in assessing the suitability of crop types for shade systems, and thus for agrivoltaic or other dual land-use systems. Detailed yield response curves, as provided by this study, are valuable tools in optimizing the output of annual crop components in these systems. Crop specific meta-analysis Shading Agrivoltaics Shade sensitivity Shade tolerance Crop yield Pataczek, Lisa (orcid)0000-0003-4206-7791 aut Feuerbacher, Arndt aut Zikeli, Sabine aut Högy, Petra aut Enthalten in Agronomy for sustainable development Springer Paris, 2005 42(2022), 3 vom: 01. Juni (DE-627)483301795 (DE-600)2182736-9 (DE-576)116898356 1774-0746 nnns volume:42 year:2022 number:3 day:01 month:06 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FRK SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-ROK SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 AR 42 2022 3 01 06 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2078821284 (DE-He213)s13593-022-00783-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 580 630 640 VZ 12 ssgn Laub, Moritz verfasserin aut Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems: a meta-analysis 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2022 Abstract Despite the large body of research surrounding crop growth parameters, there is still a lack of systematic assessments on how harvestable yields of different crop types respond to varying levels of shading. However, with the advent of agrivoltaic systems, a technology that combines energy and food production, shade tolerance of cropping systems is becoming increasingly important. To address this research gap, a meta-analysis with data from two experimental approaches (intercropping and artificial shading with cloths, nets or solar panels) was performed. The aim was to quantitatively assess the susceptibility of different temperate crop types to increasing levels of shading. Crop type specific yield response curves were developed as a function of reduction in solar radiation, estimating relative crop yields compared to the unshaded controls. Only studies that reported reduction in solar radiation and crop yield per area in temperate and subtropical areas were included. The results suggested a nonlinear relationship between achieved crop yields and reduction in solar radiation for all crop types. Most crops tolerate reduced solar radiation up to 15%, showing a less than proportional yield decline. However, significant differences between the response curves of the following crop types existed: Berries, fruits and fruity vegetables benefited from reduction in solar radiation up to 30%. Forages, leafy vegetables, tubers/root crops, and $ C_{3} $ cereals initially showed less than proportional crop yield loss. In contrast, maize and grain legumes experienced strong crop yield losses even at low shade levels. The results provide a set of initial indicators that may be used in assessing the suitability of crop types for shade systems, and thus for agrivoltaic or other dual land-use systems. Detailed yield response curves, as provided by this study, are valuable tools in optimizing the output of annual crop components in these systems. Crop specific meta-analysis Shading Agrivoltaics Shade sensitivity Shade tolerance Crop yield Pataczek, Lisa (orcid)0000-0003-4206-7791 aut Feuerbacher, Arndt aut Zikeli, Sabine aut Högy, Petra aut Enthalten in Agronomy for sustainable development Springer Paris, 2005 42(2022), 3 vom: 01. Juni (DE-627)483301795 (DE-600)2182736-9 (DE-576)116898356 1774-0746 nnns volume:42 year:2022 number:3 day:01 month:06 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FRK SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-ROK SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 AR 42 2022 3 01 06 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Agronomy for sustainable development 42(2022), 3 vom: 01. Juni volume:42 year:2022 number:3 day:01 month:06 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Agronomy for sustainable development 42(2022), 3 vom: 01. Juni volume:42 year:2022 number:3 day:01 month:06 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Crop specific meta-analysis Shading Agrivoltaics Shade sensitivity Shade tolerance Crop yield |
| dewey-raw |
580 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Agronomy for sustainable development |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Laub, Moritz @@aut@@ Pataczek, Lisa @@aut@@ Feuerbacher, Arndt @@aut@@ Zikeli, Sabine @@aut@@ Högy, Petra @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-06-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
483301795 |
| dewey-sort |
3580 |
| id |
OLC2078821284 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2078821284</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230517102405.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221220s2022 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2078821284</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s13593-022-00783-7-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">580</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laub, Moritz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems: a meta-analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Despite the large body of research surrounding crop growth parameters, there is still a lack of systematic assessments on how harvestable yields of different crop types respond to varying levels of shading. However, with the advent of agrivoltaic systems, a technology that combines energy and food production, shade tolerance of cropping systems is becoming increasingly important. To address this research gap, a meta-analysis with data from two experimental approaches (intercropping and artificial shading with cloths, nets or solar panels) was performed. The aim was to quantitatively assess the susceptibility of different temperate crop types to increasing levels of shading. Crop type specific yield response curves were developed as a function of reduction in solar radiation, estimating relative crop yields compared to the unshaded controls. Only studies that reported reduction in solar radiation and crop yield per area in temperate and subtropical areas were included. The results suggested a nonlinear relationship between achieved crop yields and reduction in solar radiation for all crop types. Most crops tolerate reduced solar radiation up to 15%, showing a less than proportional yield decline. However, significant differences between the response curves of the following crop types existed: Berries, fruits and fruity vegetables benefited from reduction in solar radiation up to 30%. Forages, leafy vegetables, tubers/root crops, and $ C_{3} $ cereals initially showed less than proportional crop yield loss. In contrast, maize and grain legumes experienced strong crop yield losses even at low shade levels. The results provide a set of initial indicators that may be used in assessing the suitability of crop types for shade systems, and thus for agrivoltaic or other dual land-use systems. Detailed yield response curves, as provided by this study, are valuable tools in optimizing the output of annual crop components in these systems.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Crop specific meta-analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Shading</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Agrivoltaics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Shade sensitivity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Shade tolerance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Crop yield</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pataczek, Lisa</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-4206-7791</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Feuerbacher, Arndt</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zikeli, Sabine</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Högy, Petra</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Agronomy for sustainable development</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Paris, 2005</subfield><subfield code="g">42(2022), 3 vom: 01. Juni</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)483301795</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2182736-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)116898356</subfield><subfield code="x">1774-0746</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:42</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FRK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ROK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">42</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Laub, Moritz |
| spellingShingle |
Laub, Moritz ddc 580 ssgn 12 misc Crop specific meta-analysis misc Shading misc Agrivoltaics misc Shade sensitivity misc Shade tolerance misc Crop yield Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems: a meta-analysis |
| authorStr |
Laub, Moritz |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)483301795 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
580 - Plants (Botany) 630 - Agriculture & related technologies 640 - Home & family management |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1774-0746 |
| topic_title |
580 630 640 VZ 12 ssgn Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems: a meta-analysis Crop specific meta-analysis Shading Agrivoltaics Shade sensitivity Shade tolerance Crop yield |
| topic |
ddc 580 ssgn 12 misc Crop specific meta-analysis misc Shading misc Agrivoltaics misc Shade sensitivity misc Shade tolerance misc Crop yield |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 580 ssgn 12 misc Crop specific meta-analysis misc Shading misc Agrivoltaics misc Shade sensitivity misc Shade tolerance misc Crop yield |
| topic_browse |
ddc 580 ssgn 12 misc Crop specific meta-analysis misc Shading misc Agrivoltaics misc Shade sensitivity misc Shade tolerance misc Crop yield |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Agronomy for sustainable development |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
483301795 |
| dewey-tens |
580 - Plants (Botany) 630 - Agriculture 640 - Home & family management |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Agronomy for sustainable development |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)483301795 (DE-600)2182736-9 (DE-576)116898356 |
| title |
Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems: a meta-analysis |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2078821284 (DE-He213)s13593-022-00783-7-p |
| title_full |
Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems: a meta-analysis |
| author_sort |
Laub, Moritz |
| journal |
Agronomy for sustainable development |
| journalStr |
Agronomy for sustainable development |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
Laub, Moritz Pataczek, Lisa Feuerbacher, Arndt Zikeli, Sabine Högy, Petra |
| container_volume |
42 |
| class |
580 630 640 VZ 12 ssgn |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Laub, Moritz |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7 |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0003-4206-7791 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0003-4206-7791 |
| dewey-full |
580 630 640 |
| title_sort |
contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems: a meta-analysis |
| title_auth |
Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems: a meta-analysis |
| abstract |
Abstract Despite the large body of research surrounding crop growth parameters, there is still a lack of systematic assessments on how harvestable yields of different crop types respond to varying levels of shading. However, with the advent of agrivoltaic systems, a technology that combines energy and food production, shade tolerance of cropping systems is becoming increasingly important. To address this research gap, a meta-analysis with data from two experimental approaches (intercropping and artificial shading with cloths, nets or solar panels) was performed. The aim was to quantitatively assess the susceptibility of different temperate crop types to increasing levels of shading. Crop type specific yield response curves were developed as a function of reduction in solar radiation, estimating relative crop yields compared to the unshaded controls. Only studies that reported reduction in solar radiation and crop yield per area in temperate and subtropical areas were included. The results suggested a nonlinear relationship between achieved crop yields and reduction in solar radiation for all crop types. Most crops tolerate reduced solar radiation up to 15%, showing a less than proportional yield decline. However, significant differences between the response curves of the following crop types existed: Berries, fruits and fruity vegetables benefited from reduction in solar radiation up to 30%. Forages, leafy vegetables, tubers/root crops, and $ C_{3} $ cereals initially showed less than proportional crop yield loss. In contrast, maize and grain legumes experienced strong crop yield losses even at low shade levels. The results provide a set of initial indicators that may be used in assessing the suitability of crop types for shade systems, and thus for agrivoltaic or other dual land-use systems. Detailed yield response curves, as provided by this study, are valuable tools in optimizing the output of annual crop components in these systems. © The Author(s) 2022 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Despite the large body of research surrounding crop growth parameters, there is still a lack of systematic assessments on how harvestable yields of different crop types respond to varying levels of shading. However, with the advent of agrivoltaic systems, a technology that combines energy and food production, shade tolerance of cropping systems is becoming increasingly important. To address this research gap, a meta-analysis with data from two experimental approaches (intercropping and artificial shading with cloths, nets or solar panels) was performed. The aim was to quantitatively assess the susceptibility of different temperate crop types to increasing levels of shading. Crop type specific yield response curves were developed as a function of reduction in solar radiation, estimating relative crop yields compared to the unshaded controls. Only studies that reported reduction in solar radiation and crop yield per area in temperate and subtropical areas were included. The results suggested a nonlinear relationship between achieved crop yields and reduction in solar radiation for all crop types. Most crops tolerate reduced solar radiation up to 15%, showing a less than proportional yield decline. However, significant differences between the response curves of the following crop types existed: Berries, fruits and fruity vegetables benefited from reduction in solar radiation up to 30%. Forages, leafy vegetables, tubers/root crops, and $ C_{3} $ cereals initially showed less than proportional crop yield loss. In contrast, maize and grain legumes experienced strong crop yield losses even at low shade levels. The results provide a set of initial indicators that may be used in assessing the suitability of crop types for shade systems, and thus for agrivoltaic or other dual land-use systems. Detailed yield response curves, as provided by this study, are valuable tools in optimizing the output of annual crop components in these systems. © The Author(s) 2022 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Despite the large body of research surrounding crop growth parameters, there is still a lack of systematic assessments on how harvestable yields of different crop types respond to varying levels of shading. However, with the advent of agrivoltaic systems, a technology that combines energy and food production, shade tolerance of cropping systems is becoming increasingly important. To address this research gap, a meta-analysis with data from two experimental approaches (intercropping and artificial shading with cloths, nets or solar panels) was performed. The aim was to quantitatively assess the susceptibility of different temperate crop types to increasing levels of shading. Crop type specific yield response curves were developed as a function of reduction in solar radiation, estimating relative crop yields compared to the unshaded controls. Only studies that reported reduction in solar radiation and crop yield per area in temperate and subtropical areas were included. The results suggested a nonlinear relationship between achieved crop yields and reduction in solar radiation for all crop types. Most crops tolerate reduced solar radiation up to 15%, showing a less than proportional yield decline. However, significant differences between the response curves of the following crop types existed: Berries, fruits and fruity vegetables benefited from reduction in solar radiation up to 30%. Forages, leafy vegetables, tubers/root crops, and $ C_{3} $ cereals initially showed less than proportional crop yield loss. In contrast, maize and grain legumes experienced strong crop yield losses even at low shade levels. The results provide a set of initial indicators that may be used in assessing the suitability of crop types for shade systems, and thus for agrivoltaic or other dual land-use systems. Detailed yield response curves, as provided by this study, are valuable tools in optimizing the output of annual crop components in these systems. © The Author(s) 2022 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FRK SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-ROK SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems: a meta-analysis |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Pataczek, Lisa Feuerbacher, Arndt Zikeli, Sabine Högy, Petra |
| author2Str |
Pataczek, Lisa Feuerbacher, Arndt Zikeli, Sabine Högy, Petra |
| ppnlink |
483301795 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T22:17:24.197Z |
| _version_ |
1803597952264962048 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2078821284</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230517102405.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221220s2022 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2078821284</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s13593-022-00783-7-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">580</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laub, Moritz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems: a meta-analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Despite the large body of research surrounding crop growth parameters, there is still a lack of systematic assessments on how harvestable yields of different crop types respond to varying levels of shading. However, with the advent of agrivoltaic systems, a technology that combines energy and food production, shade tolerance of cropping systems is becoming increasingly important. To address this research gap, a meta-analysis with data from two experimental approaches (intercropping and artificial shading with cloths, nets or solar panels) was performed. The aim was to quantitatively assess the susceptibility of different temperate crop types to increasing levels of shading. Crop type specific yield response curves were developed as a function of reduction in solar radiation, estimating relative crop yields compared to the unshaded controls. Only studies that reported reduction in solar radiation and crop yield per area in temperate and subtropical areas were included. The results suggested a nonlinear relationship between achieved crop yields and reduction in solar radiation for all crop types. Most crops tolerate reduced solar radiation up to 15%, showing a less than proportional yield decline. However, significant differences between the response curves of the following crop types existed: Berries, fruits and fruity vegetables benefited from reduction in solar radiation up to 30%. Forages, leafy vegetables, tubers/root crops, and $ C_{3} $ cereals initially showed less than proportional crop yield loss. In contrast, maize and grain legumes experienced strong crop yield losses even at low shade levels. The results provide a set of initial indicators that may be used in assessing the suitability of crop types for shade systems, and thus for agrivoltaic or other dual land-use systems. Detailed yield response curves, as provided by this study, are valuable tools in optimizing the output of annual crop components in these systems.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Crop specific meta-analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Shading</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Agrivoltaics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Shade sensitivity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Shade tolerance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Crop yield</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pataczek, Lisa</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-4206-7791</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Feuerbacher, Arndt</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zikeli, Sabine</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Högy, Petra</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Agronomy for sustainable development</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Paris, 2005</subfield><subfield code="g">42(2022), 3 vom: 01. Juni</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)483301795</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2182736-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)116898356</subfield><subfield code="x">1774-0746</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:42</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FRK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ROK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">42</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399685 |