Systematic benchmarking of performance, environmental and sustainability impacts of utilization of alternative cleaner fuel in an aircraft gas turbine engine
Abstract Recently, as a result of the increasing use of fossil fuels in the world, environmentally friendly alternative fuel researches have become an important topic. The present study aims to examine the possible consequences of hydrogen fuel usage as an alternative fuel on the general performance...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2021 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Environmental science and pollution research - Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1994, 29(2021), 34 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 51012-51029 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:29 ; year:2021 ; number:34 ; day:30 ; month:09 ; pages:51012-51029 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11356-021-16508-4 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC2079169181 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2079169181 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230606195259.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 221220s2021 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11356-021-16508-4 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2079169181 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s11356-021-16508-4-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |a 360 |a 333.7 |q VZ |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 690 |a 333.7 |a 540 |q VZ |
084 | |a BIODIV |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
100 | 1 | |a Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0003-2101-6151 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Systematic benchmarking of performance, environmental and sustainability impacts of utilization of alternative cleaner fuel in an aircraft gas turbine engine |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 | ||
520 | |a Abstract Recently, as a result of the increasing use of fossil fuels in the world, environmentally friendly alternative fuel researches have become an important topic. The present study aims to examine the possible consequences of hydrogen fuel usage as an alternative fuel on the general performance, sustainability performance and environmental performance in the medium scale aircraft turboprop engine. Within this aim, a comprehensive exergetic analysis of the turboprop engine is conducted for both the hydrogen fuel utilization case and jet fuel utilization case. Then, depending on the fourteen performance metrics determined for the concept of the study, the effects of hydrogen fuel usage were observed. As per the results, the fuel mass stream rate reduces from 0.0145 kg/s to 0.052 kg/s compared to the jet fuel usage, while the stationary stream of air mass rate is 8.66 kg/s. Pollutant emissions mass stream rate decreases from 8.805 kg/s to 8.712 kg/s. The fuel exergy rate of the overall system rises from 6588.29 kW to 7002.36 kW. The product exergy rate of the overall system drops from 1135.928 kW to 1134.495 kW. The waste exergy rate of the overall system increases from 5452.36 kW to 5867.87 kW. While the exergetic sustainability index and sustainable efficiency factor of the system decrease from 0.21 to 0.19 and decrease from 1.21 to 1.19, the environmental effect factor and ecological effect factor of the system increment from 4.80 to 5.17, an increment from 5.80 to 6.17, respectively. The environmental effect factor of the overall system increment from 2.36 to 2.57, while the sustainable efficiency factor of the overall system reduces from 1.42 to 1.38. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Environmental metrics | |
650 | 4 | |a Sustainability metrics | |
650 | 4 | |a Cleaner fuel | |
650 | 4 | |a Aero engines | |
650 | 4 | |a Hydrogen fuel | |
650 | 4 | |a Sustainable aviation | |
650 | 4 | |a Systematic benchmarking | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Environmental science and pollution research |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1994 |g 29(2021), 34 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 51012-51029 |w (DE-627)171335805 |w (DE-600)1178791-0 |w (DE-576)038875101 |x 0944-1344 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:29 |g year:2021 |g number:34 |g day:30 |g month:09 |g pages:51012-51029 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16508-4 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-UMW | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-ARC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-CHE | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-FOR | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_252 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_267 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2018 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4277 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 29 |j 2021 |e 34 |b 30 |c 09 |h 51012-51029 |
author_variant |
h y a hy hya |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:09441344:2021----::ytmtcecmrigfefracevrnetlnssanbltipcsftlztooatraiela |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
publishDate |
2021 |
allfields |
10.1007/s11356-021-16508-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2079169181 (DE-He213)s11356-021-16508-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 360 333.7 VZ 690 333.7 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2101-6151 aut Systematic benchmarking of performance, environmental and sustainability impacts of utilization of alternative cleaner fuel in an aircraft gas turbine engine 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 Abstract Recently, as a result of the increasing use of fossil fuels in the world, environmentally friendly alternative fuel researches have become an important topic. The present study aims to examine the possible consequences of hydrogen fuel usage as an alternative fuel on the general performance, sustainability performance and environmental performance in the medium scale aircraft turboprop engine. Within this aim, a comprehensive exergetic analysis of the turboprop engine is conducted for both the hydrogen fuel utilization case and jet fuel utilization case. Then, depending on the fourteen performance metrics determined for the concept of the study, the effects of hydrogen fuel usage were observed. As per the results, the fuel mass stream rate reduces from 0.0145 kg/s to 0.052 kg/s compared to the jet fuel usage, while the stationary stream of air mass rate is 8.66 kg/s. Pollutant emissions mass stream rate decreases from 8.805 kg/s to 8.712 kg/s. The fuel exergy rate of the overall system rises from 6588.29 kW to 7002.36 kW. The product exergy rate of the overall system drops from 1135.928 kW to 1134.495 kW. The waste exergy rate of the overall system increases from 5452.36 kW to 5867.87 kW. While the exergetic sustainability index and sustainable efficiency factor of the system decrease from 0.21 to 0.19 and decrease from 1.21 to 1.19, the environmental effect factor and ecological effect factor of the system increment from 4.80 to 5.17, an increment from 5.80 to 6.17, respectively. The environmental effect factor of the overall system increment from 2.36 to 2.57, while the sustainable efficiency factor of the overall system reduces from 1.42 to 1.38. Environmental metrics Sustainability metrics Cleaner fuel Aero engines Hydrogen fuel Sustainable aviation Systematic benchmarking Enthalten in Environmental science and pollution research Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1994 29(2021), 34 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 51012-51029 (DE-627)171335805 (DE-600)1178791-0 (DE-576)038875101 0944-1344 nnns volume:29 year:2021 number:34 day:30 month:09 pages:51012-51029 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16508-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4277 AR 29 2021 34 30 09 51012-51029 |
spelling |
10.1007/s11356-021-16508-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2079169181 (DE-He213)s11356-021-16508-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 360 333.7 VZ 690 333.7 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2101-6151 aut Systematic benchmarking of performance, environmental and sustainability impacts of utilization of alternative cleaner fuel in an aircraft gas turbine engine 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 Abstract Recently, as a result of the increasing use of fossil fuels in the world, environmentally friendly alternative fuel researches have become an important topic. The present study aims to examine the possible consequences of hydrogen fuel usage as an alternative fuel on the general performance, sustainability performance and environmental performance in the medium scale aircraft turboprop engine. Within this aim, a comprehensive exergetic analysis of the turboprop engine is conducted for both the hydrogen fuel utilization case and jet fuel utilization case. Then, depending on the fourteen performance metrics determined for the concept of the study, the effects of hydrogen fuel usage were observed. As per the results, the fuel mass stream rate reduces from 0.0145 kg/s to 0.052 kg/s compared to the jet fuel usage, while the stationary stream of air mass rate is 8.66 kg/s. Pollutant emissions mass stream rate decreases from 8.805 kg/s to 8.712 kg/s. The fuel exergy rate of the overall system rises from 6588.29 kW to 7002.36 kW. The product exergy rate of the overall system drops from 1135.928 kW to 1134.495 kW. The waste exergy rate of the overall system increases from 5452.36 kW to 5867.87 kW. While the exergetic sustainability index and sustainable efficiency factor of the system decrease from 0.21 to 0.19 and decrease from 1.21 to 1.19, the environmental effect factor and ecological effect factor of the system increment from 4.80 to 5.17, an increment from 5.80 to 6.17, respectively. The environmental effect factor of the overall system increment from 2.36 to 2.57, while the sustainable efficiency factor of the overall system reduces from 1.42 to 1.38. Environmental metrics Sustainability metrics Cleaner fuel Aero engines Hydrogen fuel Sustainable aviation Systematic benchmarking Enthalten in Environmental science and pollution research Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1994 29(2021), 34 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 51012-51029 (DE-627)171335805 (DE-600)1178791-0 (DE-576)038875101 0944-1344 nnns volume:29 year:2021 number:34 day:30 month:09 pages:51012-51029 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16508-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4277 AR 29 2021 34 30 09 51012-51029 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11356-021-16508-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2079169181 (DE-He213)s11356-021-16508-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 360 333.7 VZ 690 333.7 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2101-6151 aut Systematic benchmarking of performance, environmental and sustainability impacts of utilization of alternative cleaner fuel in an aircraft gas turbine engine 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 Abstract Recently, as a result of the increasing use of fossil fuels in the world, environmentally friendly alternative fuel researches have become an important topic. The present study aims to examine the possible consequences of hydrogen fuel usage as an alternative fuel on the general performance, sustainability performance and environmental performance in the medium scale aircraft turboprop engine. Within this aim, a comprehensive exergetic analysis of the turboprop engine is conducted for both the hydrogen fuel utilization case and jet fuel utilization case. Then, depending on the fourteen performance metrics determined for the concept of the study, the effects of hydrogen fuel usage were observed. As per the results, the fuel mass stream rate reduces from 0.0145 kg/s to 0.052 kg/s compared to the jet fuel usage, while the stationary stream of air mass rate is 8.66 kg/s. Pollutant emissions mass stream rate decreases from 8.805 kg/s to 8.712 kg/s. The fuel exergy rate of the overall system rises from 6588.29 kW to 7002.36 kW. The product exergy rate of the overall system drops from 1135.928 kW to 1134.495 kW. The waste exergy rate of the overall system increases from 5452.36 kW to 5867.87 kW. While the exergetic sustainability index and sustainable efficiency factor of the system decrease from 0.21 to 0.19 and decrease from 1.21 to 1.19, the environmental effect factor and ecological effect factor of the system increment from 4.80 to 5.17, an increment from 5.80 to 6.17, respectively. The environmental effect factor of the overall system increment from 2.36 to 2.57, while the sustainable efficiency factor of the overall system reduces from 1.42 to 1.38. Environmental metrics Sustainability metrics Cleaner fuel Aero engines Hydrogen fuel Sustainable aviation Systematic benchmarking Enthalten in Environmental science and pollution research Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1994 29(2021), 34 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 51012-51029 (DE-627)171335805 (DE-600)1178791-0 (DE-576)038875101 0944-1344 nnns volume:29 year:2021 number:34 day:30 month:09 pages:51012-51029 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16508-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4277 AR 29 2021 34 30 09 51012-51029 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11356-021-16508-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2079169181 (DE-He213)s11356-021-16508-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 360 333.7 VZ 690 333.7 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2101-6151 aut Systematic benchmarking of performance, environmental and sustainability impacts of utilization of alternative cleaner fuel in an aircraft gas turbine engine 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 Abstract Recently, as a result of the increasing use of fossil fuels in the world, environmentally friendly alternative fuel researches have become an important topic. The present study aims to examine the possible consequences of hydrogen fuel usage as an alternative fuel on the general performance, sustainability performance and environmental performance in the medium scale aircraft turboprop engine. Within this aim, a comprehensive exergetic analysis of the turboprop engine is conducted for both the hydrogen fuel utilization case and jet fuel utilization case. Then, depending on the fourteen performance metrics determined for the concept of the study, the effects of hydrogen fuel usage were observed. As per the results, the fuel mass stream rate reduces from 0.0145 kg/s to 0.052 kg/s compared to the jet fuel usage, while the stationary stream of air mass rate is 8.66 kg/s. Pollutant emissions mass stream rate decreases from 8.805 kg/s to 8.712 kg/s. The fuel exergy rate of the overall system rises from 6588.29 kW to 7002.36 kW. The product exergy rate of the overall system drops from 1135.928 kW to 1134.495 kW. The waste exergy rate of the overall system increases from 5452.36 kW to 5867.87 kW. While the exergetic sustainability index and sustainable efficiency factor of the system decrease from 0.21 to 0.19 and decrease from 1.21 to 1.19, the environmental effect factor and ecological effect factor of the system increment from 4.80 to 5.17, an increment from 5.80 to 6.17, respectively. The environmental effect factor of the overall system increment from 2.36 to 2.57, while the sustainable efficiency factor of the overall system reduces from 1.42 to 1.38. Environmental metrics Sustainability metrics Cleaner fuel Aero engines Hydrogen fuel Sustainable aviation Systematic benchmarking Enthalten in Environmental science and pollution research Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1994 29(2021), 34 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 51012-51029 (DE-627)171335805 (DE-600)1178791-0 (DE-576)038875101 0944-1344 nnns volume:29 year:2021 number:34 day:30 month:09 pages:51012-51029 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16508-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4277 AR 29 2021 34 30 09 51012-51029 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11356-021-16508-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2079169181 (DE-He213)s11356-021-16508-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 360 333.7 VZ 690 333.7 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2101-6151 aut Systematic benchmarking of performance, environmental and sustainability impacts of utilization of alternative cleaner fuel in an aircraft gas turbine engine 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 Abstract Recently, as a result of the increasing use of fossil fuels in the world, environmentally friendly alternative fuel researches have become an important topic. The present study aims to examine the possible consequences of hydrogen fuel usage as an alternative fuel on the general performance, sustainability performance and environmental performance in the medium scale aircraft turboprop engine. Within this aim, a comprehensive exergetic analysis of the turboprop engine is conducted for both the hydrogen fuel utilization case and jet fuel utilization case. Then, depending on the fourteen performance metrics determined for the concept of the study, the effects of hydrogen fuel usage were observed. As per the results, the fuel mass stream rate reduces from 0.0145 kg/s to 0.052 kg/s compared to the jet fuel usage, while the stationary stream of air mass rate is 8.66 kg/s. Pollutant emissions mass stream rate decreases from 8.805 kg/s to 8.712 kg/s. The fuel exergy rate of the overall system rises from 6588.29 kW to 7002.36 kW. The product exergy rate of the overall system drops from 1135.928 kW to 1134.495 kW. The waste exergy rate of the overall system increases from 5452.36 kW to 5867.87 kW. While the exergetic sustainability index and sustainable efficiency factor of the system decrease from 0.21 to 0.19 and decrease from 1.21 to 1.19, the environmental effect factor and ecological effect factor of the system increment from 4.80 to 5.17, an increment from 5.80 to 6.17, respectively. The environmental effect factor of the overall system increment from 2.36 to 2.57, while the sustainable efficiency factor of the overall system reduces from 1.42 to 1.38. Environmental metrics Sustainability metrics Cleaner fuel Aero engines Hydrogen fuel Sustainable aviation Systematic benchmarking Enthalten in Environmental science and pollution research Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1994 29(2021), 34 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 51012-51029 (DE-627)171335805 (DE-600)1178791-0 (DE-576)038875101 0944-1344 nnns volume:29 year:2021 number:34 day:30 month:09 pages:51012-51029 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16508-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4277 AR 29 2021 34 30 09 51012-51029 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Environmental science and pollution research 29(2021), 34 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 51012-51029 volume:29 year:2021 number:34 day:30 month:09 pages:51012-51029 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Environmental science and pollution research 29(2021), 34 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 51012-51029 volume:29 year:2021 number:34 day:30 month:09 pages:51012-51029 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Environmental metrics Sustainability metrics Cleaner fuel Aero engines Hydrogen fuel Sustainable aviation Systematic benchmarking |
dewey-raw |
570 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Environmental science and pollution research |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-09-30T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
171335805 |
dewey-sort |
3570 |
id |
OLC2079169181 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2079169181</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230606195259.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221220s2021 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11356-021-16508-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2079169181</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11356-021-16508-4-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">360</subfield><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-2101-6151</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Systematic benchmarking of performance, environmental and sustainability impacts of utilization of alternative cleaner fuel in an aircraft gas turbine engine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Recently, as a result of the increasing use of fossil fuels in the world, environmentally friendly alternative fuel researches have become an important topic. The present study aims to examine the possible consequences of hydrogen fuel usage as an alternative fuel on the general performance, sustainability performance and environmental performance in the medium scale aircraft turboprop engine. Within this aim, a comprehensive exergetic analysis of the turboprop engine is conducted for both the hydrogen fuel utilization case and jet fuel utilization case. Then, depending on the fourteen performance metrics determined for the concept of the study, the effects of hydrogen fuel usage were observed. As per the results, the fuel mass stream rate reduces from 0.0145 kg/s to 0.052 kg/s compared to the jet fuel usage, while the stationary stream of air mass rate is 8.66 kg/s. Pollutant emissions mass stream rate decreases from 8.805 kg/s to 8.712 kg/s. The fuel exergy rate of the overall system rises from 6588.29 kW to 7002.36 kW. The product exergy rate of the overall system drops from 1135.928 kW to 1134.495 kW. The waste exergy rate of the overall system increases from 5452.36 kW to 5867.87 kW. While the exergetic sustainability index and sustainable efficiency factor of the system decrease from 0.21 to 0.19 and decrease from 1.21 to 1.19, the environmental effect factor and ecological effect factor of the system increment from 4.80 to 5.17, an increment from 5.80 to 6.17, respectively. The environmental effect factor of the overall system increment from 2.36 to 2.57, while the sustainable efficiency factor of the overall system reduces from 1.42 to 1.38.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environmental metrics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sustainability metrics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cleaner fuel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aero engines</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hydrogen fuel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sustainable aviation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Systematic benchmarking</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Environmental science and pollution research</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1994</subfield><subfield code="g">29(2021), 34 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 51012-51029</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)171335805</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1178791-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)038875101</subfield><subfield code="x">0944-1344</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:29</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:34</subfield><subfield code="g">day:30</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:51012-51029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16508-4</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_252</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">29</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">34</subfield><subfield code="b">30</subfield><subfield code="c">09</subfield><subfield code="h">51012-51029</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin |
spellingShingle |
Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin ddc 570 ddc 690 fid BIODIV misc Environmental metrics misc Sustainability metrics misc Cleaner fuel misc Aero engines misc Hydrogen fuel misc Sustainable aviation misc Systematic benchmarking Systematic benchmarking of performance, environmental and sustainability impacts of utilization of alternative cleaner fuel in an aircraft gas turbine engine |
authorStr |
Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)171335805 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
570 - Life sciences; biology 360 - Social problems & services; associations 333 - Economics of land & energy 690 - Buildings 540 - Chemistry & allied sciences |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0944-1344 |
topic_title |
570 360 333.7 VZ 690 333.7 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Systematic benchmarking of performance, environmental and sustainability impacts of utilization of alternative cleaner fuel in an aircraft gas turbine engine Environmental metrics Sustainability metrics Cleaner fuel Aero engines Hydrogen fuel Sustainable aviation Systematic benchmarking |
topic |
ddc 570 ddc 690 fid BIODIV misc Environmental metrics misc Sustainability metrics misc Cleaner fuel misc Aero engines misc Hydrogen fuel misc Sustainable aviation misc Systematic benchmarking |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 570 ddc 690 fid BIODIV misc Environmental metrics misc Sustainability metrics misc Cleaner fuel misc Aero engines misc Hydrogen fuel misc Sustainable aviation misc Systematic benchmarking |
topic_browse |
ddc 570 ddc 690 fid BIODIV misc Environmental metrics misc Sustainability metrics misc Cleaner fuel misc Aero engines misc Hydrogen fuel misc Sustainable aviation misc Systematic benchmarking |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Environmental science and pollution research |
hierarchy_parent_id |
171335805 |
dewey-tens |
570 - Life sciences; biology 360 - Social problems & social services 330 - Economics 690 - Building & construction 540 - Chemistry |
hierarchy_top_title |
Environmental science and pollution research |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)171335805 (DE-600)1178791-0 (DE-576)038875101 |
title |
Systematic benchmarking of performance, environmental and sustainability impacts of utilization of alternative cleaner fuel in an aircraft gas turbine engine |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2079169181 (DE-He213)s11356-021-16508-4-p |
title_full |
Systematic benchmarking of performance, environmental and sustainability impacts of utilization of alternative cleaner fuel in an aircraft gas turbine engine |
author_sort |
Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin |
journal |
Environmental science and pollution research |
journalStr |
Environmental science and pollution research |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 300 - Social sciences 600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2021 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
51012 |
author_browse |
Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin |
container_volume |
29 |
class |
570 360 333.7 VZ 690 333.7 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11356-021-16508-4 |
normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0003-2101-6151 |
normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0003-2101-6151 |
dewey-full |
570 360 333.7 690 540 |
title_sort |
systematic benchmarking of performance, environmental and sustainability impacts of utilization of alternative cleaner fuel in an aircraft gas turbine engine |
title_auth |
Systematic benchmarking of performance, environmental and sustainability impacts of utilization of alternative cleaner fuel in an aircraft gas turbine engine |
abstract |
Abstract Recently, as a result of the increasing use of fossil fuels in the world, environmentally friendly alternative fuel researches have become an important topic. The present study aims to examine the possible consequences of hydrogen fuel usage as an alternative fuel on the general performance, sustainability performance and environmental performance in the medium scale aircraft turboprop engine. Within this aim, a comprehensive exergetic analysis of the turboprop engine is conducted for both the hydrogen fuel utilization case and jet fuel utilization case. Then, depending on the fourteen performance metrics determined for the concept of the study, the effects of hydrogen fuel usage were observed. As per the results, the fuel mass stream rate reduces from 0.0145 kg/s to 0.052 kg/s compared to the jet fuel usage, while the stationary stream of air mass rate is 8.66 kg/s. Pollutant emissions mass stream rate decreases from 8.805 kg/s to 8.712 kg/s. The fuel exergy rate of the overall system rises from 6588.29 kW to 7002.36 kW. The product exergy rate of the overall system drops from 1135.928 kW to 1134.495 kW. The waste exergy rate of the overall system increases from 5452.36 kW to 5867.87 kW. While the exergetic sustainability index and sustainable efficiency factor of the system decrease from 0.21 to 0.19 and decrease from 1.21 to 1.19, the environmental effect factor and ecological effect factor of the system increment from 4.80 to 5.17, an increment from 5.80 to 6.17, respectively. The environmental effect factor of the overall system increment from 2.36 to 2.57, while the sustainable efficiency factor of the overall system reduces from 1.42 to 1.38. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 |
abstractGer |
Abstract Recently, as a result of the increasing use of fossil fuels in the world, environmentally friendly alternative fuel researches have become an important topic. The present study aims to examine the possible consequences of hydrogen fuel usage as an alternative fuel on the general performance, sustainability performance and environmental performance in the medium scale aircraft turboprop engine. Within this aim, a comprehensive exergetic analysis of the turboprop engine is conducted for both the hydrogen fuel utilization case and jet fuel utilization case. Then, depending on the fourteen performance metrics determined for the concept of the study, the effects of hydrogen fuel usage were observed. As per the results, the fuel mass stream rate reduces from 0.0145 kg/s to 0.052 kg/s compared to the jet fuel usage, while the stationary stream of air mass rate is 8.66 kg/s. Pollutant emissions mass stream rate decreases from 8.805 kg/s to 8.712 kg/s. The fuel exergy rate of the overall system rises from 6588.29 kW to 7002.36 kW. The product exergy rate of the overall system drops from 1135.928 kW to 1134.495 kW. The waste exergy rate of the overall system increases from 5452.36 kW to 5867.87 kW. While the exergetic sustainability index and sustainable efficiency factor of the system decrease from 0.21 to 0.19 and decrease from 1.21 to 1.19, the environmental effect factor and ecological effect factor of the system increment from 4.80 to 5.17, an increment from 5.80 to 6.17, respectively. The environmental effect factor of the overall system increment from 2.36 to 2.57, while the sustainable efficiency factor of the overall system reduces from 1.42 to 1.38. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Recently, as a result of the increasing use of fossil fuels in the world, environmentally friendly alternative fuel researches have become an important topic. The present study aims to examine the possible consequences of hydrogen fuel usage as an alternative fuel on the general performance, sustainability performance and environmental performance in the medium scale aircraft turboprop engine. Within this aim, a comprehensive exergetic analysis of the turboprop engine is conducted for both the hydrogen fuel utilization case and jet fuel utilization case. Then, depending on the fourteen performance metrics determined for the concept of the study, the effects of hydrogen fuel usage were observed. As per the results, the fuel mass stream rate reduces from 0.0145 kg/s to 0.052 kg/s compared to the jet fuel usage, while the stationary stream of air mass rate is 8.66 kg/s. Pollutant emissions mass stream rate decreases from 8.805 kg/s to 8.712 kg/s. The fuel exergy rate of the overall system rises from 6588.29 kW to 7002.36 kW. The product exergy rate of the overall system drops from 1135.928 kW to 1134.495 kW. The waste exergy rate of the overall system increases from 5452.36 kW to 5867.87 kW. While the exergetic sustainability index and sustainable efficiency factor of the system decrease from 0.21 to 0.19 and decrease from 1.21 to 1.19, the environmental effect factor and ecological effect factor of the system increment from 4.80 to 5.17, an increment from 5.80 to 6.17, respectively. The environmental effect factor of the overall system increment from 2.36 to 2.57, while the sustainable efficiency factor of the overall system reduces from 1.42 to 1.38. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4277 |
container_issue |
34 |
title_short |
Systematic benchmarking of performance, environmental and sustainability impacts of utilization of alternative cleaner fuel in an aircraft gas turbine engine |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16508-4 |
remote_bool |
false |
ppnlink |
171335805 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s11356-021-16508-4 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T23:48:36.232Z |
_version_ |
1803603690111631360 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2079169181</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230606195259.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221220s2021 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11356-021-16508-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2079169181</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11356-021-16508-4-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">360</subfield><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-2101-6151</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Systematic benchmarking of performance, environmental and sustainability impacts of utilization of alternative cleaner fuel in an aircraft gas turbine engine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Recently, as a result of the increasing use of fossil fuels in the world, environmentally friendly alternative fuel researches have become an important topic. The present study aims to examine the possible consequences of hydrogen fuel usage as an alternative fuel on the general performance, sustainability performance and environmental performance in the medium scale aircraft turboprop engine. Within this aim, a comprehensive exergetic analysis of the turboprop engine is conducted for both the hydrogen fuel utilization case and jet fuel utilization case. Then, depending on the fourteen performance metrics determined for the concept of the study, the effects of hydrogen fuel usage were observed. As per the results, the fuel mass stream rate reduces from 0.0145 kg/s to 0.052 kg/s compared to the jet fuel usage, while the stationary stream of air mass rate is 8.66 kg/s. Pollutant emissions mass stream rate decreases from 8.805 kg/s to 8.712 kg/s. The fuel exergy rate of the overall system rises from 6588.29 kW to 7002.36 kW. The product exergy rate of the overall system drops from 1135.928 kW to 1134.495 kW. The waste exergy rate of the overall system increases from 5452.36 kW to 5867.87 kW. While the exergetic sustainability index and sustainable efficiency factor of the system decrease from 0.21 to 0.19 and decrease from 1.21 to 1.19, the environmental effect factor and ecological effect factor of the system increment from 4.80 to 5.17, an increment from 5.80 to 6.17, respectively. The environmental effect factor of the overall system increment from 2.36 to 2.57, while the sustainable efficiency factor of the overall system reduces from 1.42 to 1.38.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environmental metrics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sustainability metrics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cleaner fuel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aero engines</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hydrogen fuel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sustainable aviation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Systematic benchmarking</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Environmental science and pollution research</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1994</subfield><subfield code="g">29(2021), 34 vom: 30. Sept., Seite 51012-51029</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)171335805</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1178791-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)038875101</subfield><subfield code="x">0944-1344</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:29</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:34</subfield><subfield code="g">day:30</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:51012-51029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16508-4</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_252</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">29</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">34</subfield><subfield code="b">30</subfield><subfield code="c">09</subfield><subfield code="h">51012-51029</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4002256 |