Striving 2.0: Faculty Collaboration and Advocacy as Strategies for Overcoming Post-Striving Organizational Priorities
Abstract A case study at a large, public research university was conducted to understand how post-striving environments, defined by those universities that achieved very high research activity classification, influence campus structures and practices related to faculty and organizational approaches...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Fernández, Kathryn A. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Innovative higher education - Springer Netherlands, 1983, 47(2022), 5 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 735-754 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:47 ; year:2022 ; number:5 ; day:01 ; month:04 ; pages:735-754 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10755-022-09599-5 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2079522647 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2079522647 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230506064153.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 221220s2022 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10755-022-09599-5 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2079522647 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10755-022-09599-5-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 370 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 24,2 |a 5,3 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Fernández, Kathryn A. |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0002-9783-5068 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Striving 2.0: Faculty Collaboration and Advocacy as Strategies for Overcoming Post-Striving Organizational Priorities |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract A case study at a large, public research university was conducted to understand how post-striving environments, defined by those universities that achieved very high research activity classification, influence campus structures and practices related to faculty and organizational approaches to pedagogy, teaching, and learning. Participants explained how organizational structures, practices, and relationships affected the process of seeking to achieve very high research activity and the impact on institutional commitments to teaching and learning. Findings indicate that striving produced an unexpected early change in Carnegie designation and created organizational tensions. Outcomes expected from the literature, such as faculty divides and inequities, contrast with new but complicated opportunities as a result of the increased research activities. Faculty had to rely on relationship building and use of mission-focused and data-driven advocacy efforts to enact pedagogy change on their campuses. A major contribution of this study is an understanding of how faculty and other teaching advocates, who are focused on non-striving priorities like innovative teaching practices, employ strategies to overcome research focused striving structures and practices. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Institutional striving | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pedagogical change | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Institutional collaboration | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shank, Julie H. |0 (orcid)0000-0001-5729-0430 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Klein, Carrie |0 (orcid)0000-0001-6462-8997 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lester, Jaime |0 (orcid)0000-0002-5399-1157 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Innovative higher education |d Springer Netherlands, 1983 |g 47(2022), 5 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 735-754 |w (DE-627)129640492 |w (DE-600)252275-5 |w (DE-576)015133478 |x 0742-5627 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:47 |g year:2022 |g number:5 |g day:01 |g month:04 |g pages:735-754 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-022-09599-5 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-HSW | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 47 |j 2022 |e 5 |b 01 |c 04 |h 735-754 | ||
| author_variant |
k a f ka kaf j h s jh jhs c k ck j l jl |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:07425627:2022----::tiig0autclaoainnavccasrtgefrvroigotti |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10755-022-09599-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2079522647 (DE-He213)s10755-022-09599-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 370 VZ 24,2 5,3 ssgn Fernández, Kathryn A. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-9783-5068 aut Striving 2.0: Faculty Collaboration and Advocacy as Strategies for Overcoming Post-Striving Organizational Priorities 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 Abstract A case study at a large, public research university was conducted to understand how post-striving environments, defined by those universities that achieved very high research activity classification, influence campus structures and practices related to faculty and organizational approaches to pedagogy, teaching, and learning. Participants explained how organizational structures, practices, and relationships affected the process of seeking to achieve very high research activity and the impact on institutional commitments to teaching and learning. Findings indicate that striving produced an unexpected early change in Carnegie designation and created organizational tensions. Outcomes expected from the literature, such as faculty divides and inequities, contrast with new but complicated opportunities as a result of the increased research activities. Faculty had to rely on relationship building and use of mission-focused and data-driven advocacy efforts to enact pedagogy change on their campuses. A major contribution of this study is an understanding of how faculty and other teaching advocates, who are focused on non-striving priorities like innovative teaching practices, employ strategies to overcome research focused striving structures and practices. Institutional striving Pedagogical change Institutional collaboration Shank, Julie H. (orcid)0000-0001-5729-0430 aut Klein, Carrie (orcid)0000-0001-6462-8997 aut Lester, Jaime (orcid)0000-0002-5399-1157 aut Enthalten in Innovative higher education Springer Netherlands, 1983 47(2022), 5 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 735-754 (DE-627)129640492 (DE-600)252275-5 (DE-576)015133478 0742-5627 nnns volume:47 year:2022 number:5 day:01 month:04 pages:735-754 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-022-09599-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-HSW AR 47 2022 5 01 04 735-754 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10755-022-09599-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2079522647 (DE-He213)s10755-022-09599-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 370 VZ 24,2 5,3 ssgn Fernández, Kathryn A. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-9783-5068 aut Striving 2.0: Faculty Collaboration and Advocacy as Strategies for Overcoming Post-Striving Organizational Priorities 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 Abstract A case study at a large, public research university was conducted to understand how post-striving environments, defined by those universities that achieved very high research activity classification, influence campus structures and practices related to faculty and organizational approaches to pedagogy, teaching, and learning. Participants explained how organizational structures, practices, and relationships affected the process of seeking to achieve very high research activity and the impact on institutional commitments to teaching and learning. Findings indicate that striving produced an unexpected early change in Carnegie designation and created organizational tensions. Outcomes expected from the literature, such as faculty divides and inequities, contrast with new but complicated opportunities as a result of the increased research activities. Faculty had to rely on relationship building and use of mission-focused and data-driven advocacy efforts to enact pedagogy change on their campuses. A major contribution of this study is an understanding of how faculty and other teaching advocates, who are focused on non-striving priorities like innovative teaching practices, employ strategies to overcome research focused striving structures and practices. Institutional striving Pedagogical change Institutional collaboration Shank, Julie H. (orcid)0000-0001-5729-0430 aut Klein, Carrie (orcid)0000-0001-6462-8997 aut Lester, Jaime (orcid)0000-0002-5399-1157 aut Enthalten in Innovative higher education Springer Netherlands, 1983 47(2022), 5 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 735-754 (DE-627)129640492 (DE-600)252275-5 (DE-576)015133478 0742-5627 nnns volume:47 year:2022 number:5 day:01 month:04 pages:735-754 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-022-09599-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-HSW AR 47 2022 5 01 04 735-754 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10755-022-09599-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2079522647 (DE-He213)s10755-022-09599-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 370 VZ 24,2 5,3 ssgn Fernández, Kathryn A. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-9783-5068 aut Striving 2.0: Faculty Collaboration and Advocacy as Strategies for Overcoming Post-Striving Organizational Priorities 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 Abstract A case study at a large, public research university was conducted to understand how post-striving environments, defined by those universities that achieved very high research activity classification, influence campus structures and practices related to faculty and organizational approaches to pedagogy, teaching, and learning. Participants explained how organizational structures, practices, and relationships affected the process of seeking to achieve very high research activity and the impact on institutional commitments to teaching and learning. Findings indicate that striving produced an unexpected early change in Carnegie designation and created organizational tensions. Outcomes expected from the literature, such as faculty divides and inequities, contrast with new but complicated opportunities as a result of the increased research activities. Faculty had to rely on relationship building and use of mission-focused and data-driven advocacy efforts to enact pedagogy change on their campuses. A major contribution of this study is an understanding of how faculty and other teaching advocates, who are focused on non-striving priorities like innovative teaching practices, employ strategies to overcome research focused striving structures and practices. Institutional striving Pedagogical change Institutional collaboration Shank, Julie H. (orcid)0000-0001-5729-0430 aut Klein, Carrie (orcid)0000-0001-6462-8997 aut Lester, Jaime (orcid)0000-0002-5399-1157 aut Enthalten in Innovative higher education Springer Netherlands, 1983 47(2022), 5 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 735-754 (DE-627)129640492 (DE-600)252275-5 (DE-576)015133478 0742-5627 nnns volume:47 year:2022 number:5 day:01 month:04 pages:735-754 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-022-09599-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-HSW AR 47 2022 5 01 04 735-754 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10755-022-09599-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2079522647 (DE-He213)s10755-022-09599-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 370 VZ 24,2 5,3 ssgn Fernández, Kathryn A. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-9783-5068 aut Striving 2.0: Faculty Collaboration and Advocacy as Strategies for Overcoming Post-Striving Organizational Priorities 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 Abstract A case study at a large, public research university was conducted to understand how post-striving environments, defined by those universities that achieved very high research activity classification, influence campus structures and practices related to faculty and organizational approaches to pedagogy, teaching, and learning. Participants explained how organizational structures, practices, and relationships affected the process of seeking to achieve very high research activity and the impact on institutional commitments to teaching and learning. Findings indicate that striving produced an unexpected early change in Carnegie designation and created organizational tensions. Outcomes expected from the literature, such as faculty divides and inequities, contrast with new but complicated opportunities as a result of the increased research activities. Faculty had to rely on relationship building and use of mission-focused and data-driven advocacy efforts to enact pedagogy change on their campuses. A major contribution of this study is an understanding of how faculty and other teaching advocates, who are focused on non-striving priorities like innovative teaching practices, employ strategies to overcome research focused striving structures and practices. Institutional striving Pedagogical change Institutional collaboration Shank, Julie H. (orcid)0000-0001-5729-0430 aut Klein, Carrie (orcid)0000-0001-6462-8997 aut Lester, Jaime (orcid)0000-0002-5399-1157 aut Enthalten in Innovative higher education Springer Netherlands, 1983 47(2022), 5 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 735-754 (DE-627)129640492 (DE-600)252275-5 (DE-576)015133478 0742-5627 nnns volume:47 year:2022 number:5 day:01 month:04 pages:735-754 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-022-09599-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-HSW AR 47 2022 5 01 04 735-754 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10755-022-09599-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2079522647 (DE-He213)s10755-022-09599-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 370 VZ 24,2 5,3 ssgn Fernández, Kathryn A. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-9783-5068 aut Striving 2.0: Faculty Collaboration and Advocacy as Strategies for Overcoming Post-Striving Organizational Priorities 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 Abstract A case study at a large, public research university was conducted to understand how post-striving environments, defined by those universities that achieved very high research activity classification, influence campus structures and practices related to faculty and organizational approaches to pedagogy, teaching, and learning. Participants explained how organizational structures, practices, and relationships affected the process of seeking to achieve very high research activity and the impact on institutional commitments to teaching and learning. Findings indicate that striving produced an unexpected early change in Carnegie designation and created organizational tensions. Outcomes expected from the literature, such as faculty divides and inequities, contrast with new but complicated opportunities as a result of the increased research activities. Faculty had to rely on relationship building and use of mission-focused and data-driven advocacy efforts to enact pedagogy change on their campuses. A major contribution of this study is an understanding of how faculty and other teaching advocates, who are focused on non-striving priorities like innovative teaching practices, employ strategies to overcome research focused striving structures and practices. Institutional striving Pedagogical change Institutional collaboration Shank, Julie H. (orcid)0000-0001-5729-0430 aut Klein, Carrie (orcid)0000-0001-6462-8997 aut Lester, Jaime (orcid)0000-0002-5399-1157 aut Enthalten in Innovative higher education Springer Netherlands, 1983 47(2022), 5 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 735-754 (DE-627)129640492 (DE-600)252275-5 (DE-576)015133478 0742-5627 nnns volume:47 year:2022 number:5 day:01 month:04 pages:735-754 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-022-09599-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-HSW AR 47 2022 5 01 04 735-754 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Innovative higher education 47(2022), 5 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 735-754 volume:47 year:2022 number:5 day:01 month:04 pages:735-754 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Innovative higher education 47(2022), 5 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 735-754 volume:47 year:2022 number:5 day:01 month:04 pages:735-754 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Institutional striving Pedagogical change Institutional collaboration |
| dewey-raw |
370 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Innovative higher education |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Fernández, Kathryn A. @@aut@@ Shank, Julie H. @@aut@@ Klein, Carrie @@aut@@ Lester, Jaime @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-04-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
129640492 |
| dewey-sort |
3370 |
| id |
OLC2079522647 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2079522647</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230506064153.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221220s2022 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10755-022-09599-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2079522647</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10755-022-09599-5-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">24,2</subfield><subfield code="a">5,3</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fernández, Kathryn A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-9783-5068</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Striving 2.0: Faculty Collaboration and Advocacy as Strategies for Overcoming Post-Striving Organizational Priorities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract A case study at a large, public research university was conducted to understand how post-striving environments, defined by those universities that achieved very high research activity classification, influence campus structures and practices related to faculty and organizational approaches to pedagogy, teaching, and learning. Participants explained how organizational structures, practices, and relationships affected the process of seeking to achieve very high research activity and the impact on institutional commitments to teaching and learning. Findings indicate that striving produced an unexpected early change in Carnegie designation and created organizational tensions. Outcomes expected from the literature, such as faculty divides and inequities, contrast with new but complicated opportunities as a result of the increased research activities. Faculty had to rely on relationship building and use of mission-focused and data-driven advocacy efforts to enact pedagogy change on their campuses. A major contribution of this study is an understanding of how faculty and other teaching advocates, who are focused on non-striving priorities like innovative teaching practices, employ strategies to overcome research focused striving structures and practices.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Institutional striving</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pedagogical change</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Institutional collaboration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shank, Julie H.</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-5729-0430</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Klein, Carrie</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-6462-8997</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lester, Jaime</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-5399-1157</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Innovative higher education</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1983</subfield><subfield code="g">47(2022), 5 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 735-754</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129640492</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)252275-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015133478</subfield><subfield code="x">0742-5627</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:47</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:735-754</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-022-09599-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-HSW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">47</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="c">04</subfield><subfield code="h">735-754</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Fernández, Kathryn A. |
| spellingShingle |
Fernández, Kathryn A. ddc 370 ssgn 24,2 misc Institutional striving misc Pedagogical change misc Institutional collaboration Striving 2.0: Faculty Collaboration and Advocacy as Strategies for Overcoming Post-Striving Organizational Priorities |
| authorStr |
Fernández, Kathryn A. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129640492 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
370 - Education |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0742-5627 |
| topic_title |
370 VZ 24,2 5,3 ssgn Striving 2.0: Faculty Collaboration and Advocacy as Strategies for Overcoming Post-Striving Organizational Priorities Institutional striving Pedagogical change Institutional collaboration |
| topic |
ddc 370 ssgn 24,2 misc Institutional striving misc Pedagogical change misc Institutional collaboration |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 370 ssgn 24,2 misc Institutional striving misc Pedagogical change misc Institutional collaboration |
| topic_browse |
ddc 370 ssgn 24,2 misc Institutional striving misc Pedagogical change misc Institutional collaboration |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Innovative higher education |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
129640492 |
| dewey-tens |
370 - Education |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Innovative higher education |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129640492 (DE-600)252275-5 (DE-576)015133478 |
| title |
Striving 2.0: Faculty Collaboration and Advocacy as Strategies for Overcoming Post-Striving Organizational Priorities |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2079522647 (DE-He213)s10755-022-09599-5-p |
| title_full |
Striving 2.0: Faculty Collaboration and Advocacy as Strategies for Overcoming Post-Striving Organizational Priorities |
| author_sort |
Fernández, Kathryn A. |
| journal |
Innovative higher education |
| journalStr |
Innovative higher education |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
735 |
| author_browse |
Fernández, Kathryn A. Shank, Julie H. Klein, Carrie Lester, Jaime |
| container_volume |
47 |
| class |
370 VZ 24,2 5,3 ssgn |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Fernández, Kathryn A. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10755-022-09599-5 |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0002-9783-5068 (ORCID)0000-0001-5729-0430 (ORCID)0000-0001-6462-8997 (ORCID)0000-0002-5399-1157 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0002-9783-5068 (orcid)0000-0001-5729-0430 (orcid)0000-0001-6462-8997 (orcid)0000-0002-5399-1157 |
| dewey-full |
370 |
| title_sort |
striving 2.0: faculty collaboration and advocacy as strategies for overcoming post-striving organizational priorities |
| title_auth |
Striving 2.0: Faculty Collaboration and Advocacy as Strategies for Overcoming Post-Striving Organizational Priorities |
| abstract |
Abstract A case study at a large, public research university was conducted to understand how post-striving environments, defined by those universities that achieved very high research activity classification, influence campus structures and practices related to faculty and organizational approaches to pedagogy, teaching, and learning. Participants explained how organizational structures, practices, and relationships affected the process of seeking to achieve very high research activity and the impact on institutional commitments to teaching and learning. Findings indicate that striving produced an unexpected early change in Carnegie designation and created organizational tensions. Outcomes expected from the literature, such as faculty divides and inequities, contrast with new but complicated opportunities as a result of the increased research activities. Faculty had to rely on relationship building and use of mission-focused and data-driven advocacy efforts to enact pedagogy change on their campuses. A major contribution of this study is an understanding of how faculty and other teaching advocates, who are focused on non-striving priorities like innovative teaching practices, employ strategies to overcome research focused striving structures and practices. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract A case study at a large, public research university was conducted to understand how post-striving environments, defined by those universities that achieved very high research activity classification, influence campus structures and practices related to faculty and organizational approaches to pedagogy, teaching, and learning. Participants explained how organizational structures, practices, and relationships affected the process of seeking to achieve very high research activity and the impact on institutional commitments to teaching and learning. Findings indicate that striving produced an unexpected early change in Carnegie designation and created organizational tensions. Outcomes expected from the literature, such as faculty divides and inequities, contrast with new but complicated opportunities as a result of the increased research activities. Faculty had to rely on relationship building and use of mission-focused and data-driven advocacy efforts to enact pedagogy change on their campuses. A major contribution of this study is an understanding of how faculty and other teaching advocates, who are focused on non-striving priorities like innovative teaching practices, employ strategies to overcome research focused striving structures and practices. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract A case study at a large, public research university was conducted to understand how post-striving environments, defined by those universities that achieved very high research activity classification, influence campus structures and practices related to faculty and organizational approaches to pedagogy, teaching, and learning. Participants explained how organizational structures, practices, and relationships affected the process of seeking to achieve very high research activity and the impact on institutional commitments to teaching and learning. Findings indicate that striving produced an unexpected early change in Carnegie designation and created organizational tensions. Outcomes expected from the literature, such as faculty divides and inequities, contrast with new but complicated opportunities as a result of the increased research activities. Faculty had to rely on relationship building and use of mission-focused and data-driven advocacy efforts to enact pedagogy change on their campuses. A major contribution of this study is an understanding of how faculty and other teaching advocates, who are focused on non-striving priorities like innovative teaching practices, employ strategies to overcome research focused striving structures and practices. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-HSW |
| container_issue |
5 |
| title_short |
Striving 2.0: Faculty Collaboration and Advocacy as Strategies for Overcoming Post-Striving Organizational Priorities |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-022-09599-5 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Shank, Julie H. Klein, Carrie Lester, Jaime |
| author2Str |
Shank, Julie H. Klein, Carrie Lester, Jaime |
| ppnlink |
129640492 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10755-022-09599-5 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T01:14:03.227Z |
| _version_ |
1803609066152394752 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2079522647</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230506064153.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221220s2022 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10755-022-09599-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2079522647</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10755-022-09599-5-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">24,2</subfield><subfield code="a">5,3</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fernández, Kathryn A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-9783-5068</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Striving 2.0: Faculty Collaboration and Advocacy as Strategies for Overcoming Post-Striving Organizational Priorities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract A case study at a large, public research university was conducted to understand how post-striving environments, defined by those universities that achieved very high research activity classification, influence campus structures and practices related to faculty and organizational approaches to pedagogy, teaching, and learning. Participants explained how organizational structures, practices, and relationships affected the process of seeking to achieve very high research activity and the impact on institutional commitments to teaching and learning. Findings indicate that striving produced an unexpected early change in Carnegie designation and created organizational tensions. Outcomes expected from the literature, such as faculty divides and inequities, contrast with new but complicated opportunities as a result of the increased research activities. Faculty had to rely on relationship building and use of mission-focused and data-driven advocacy efforts to enact pedagogy change on their campuses. A major contribution of this study is an understanding of how faculty and other teaching advocates, who are focused on non-striving priorities like innovative teaching practices, employ strategies to overcome research focused striving structures and practices.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Institutional striving</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pedagogical change</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Institutional collaboration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shank, Julie H.</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-5729-0430</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Klein, Carrie</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-6462-8997</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lester, Jaime</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-5399-1157</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Innovative higher education</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1983</subfield><subfield code="g">47(2022), 5 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 735-754</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129640492</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)252275-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015133478</subfield><subfield code="x">0742-5627</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:47</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:735-754</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-022-09599-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-HSW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">47</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="c">04</subfield><subfield code="h">735-754</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399688 |