Soil carbon sequestration as a climate strategy: what do farmers think?
Abstract Countries and companies with net-zero emissions targets are considering carbon removal strategies to compensate for remaining greenhouse gas emissions. Soil carbon sequestration is one such carbon removal strategy, and policy and corporate interest is growing in figuring out how to motivate...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Buck, Holly Jean [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2022 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Biogeochemistry - Springer International Publishing, 1984, 161(2022), 1 vom: 30. Aug., Seite 59-70 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:161 ; year:2022 ; number:1 ; day:30 ; month:08 ; pages:59-70 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2079710370 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2079710370 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230516084258.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 221221s2022 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2079710370 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10533-022-00948-2-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 540 |a 550 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 13 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Buck, Holly Jean |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0001-8940-1238 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Soil carbon sequestration as a climate strategy: what do farmers think? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s) 2022 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Countries and companies with net-zero emissions targets are considering carbon removal strategies to compensate for remaining greenhouse gas emissions. Soil carbon sequestration is one such carbon removal strategy, and policy and corporate interest is growing in figuring out how to motivate farmers to sequester more carbon. But how do farmers in various cultural and geographic contexts view soil carbon sequestration as a climate mitigation or carbon removal strategy? This article systematically reviews the empirical social science literature on farmer adoption of soil carbon sequestration practices and participation in carbon markets or programs. The article finds thirty-seven studies over the past decade that involve empirical research with soil carbon sequestering practices in a climate context, with just over a quarter of those focusing on the Global South. A central finding is co-benefits are a strong motivator for adoption, especially given minimal carbon policies and low carbon prices. Other themes in the literature include educational and cultural barriers to adoption, the difference between developing and developed world contexts, and policy preferences among farmers for soil carbon sequestration incentives. However, we argue that given the rising profile of technical potentials and carbon credits, this peer-reviewed literature on the social aspects of scaling soil carbon sequestration is quite limited. We discuss why the social science literature is so small, and what this research gap means for efforts to achieve higher levels of soil carbon sequestration. We conclude with a ten-point social science research agenda for social science on soil carbon—and some cautions about centering carbon too strongly in research and policy. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Soil carbon | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Farmers | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Adoption | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Carbon removal | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Negative emissions | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social science | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Palumbo-Compton, Alexis |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Biogeochemistry |d Springer International Publishing, 1984 |g 161(2022), 1 vom: 30. Aug., Seite 59-70 |w (DE-627)12916786X |w (DE-600)50671-0 |w (DE-576)014454904 |x 0168-2563 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:161 |g year:2022 |g number:1 |g day:30 |g month:08 |g pages:59-70 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-CHE | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-GEO | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-FOR | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-GGO | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 161 |j 2022 |e 1 |b 30 |c 08 |h 59-70 | ||
| author_variant |
h j b hj hjb a p c apc |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:01682563:2022----::olabneusrtoaalmtsrtgw |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2 doi (DE-627)OLC2079710370 (DE-He213)s10533-022-00948-2-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 550 VZ 13 ssgn Buck, Holly Jean verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-8940-1238 aut Soil carbon sequestration as a climate strategy: what do farmers think? 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2022 Abstract Countries and companies with net-zero emissions targets are considering carbon removal strategies to compensate for remaining greenhouse gas emissions. Soil carbon sequestration is one such carbon removal strategy, and policy and corporate interest is growing in figuring out how to motivate farmers to sequester more carbon. But how do farmers in various cultural and geographic contexts view soil carbon sequestration as a climate mitigation or carbon removal strategy? This article systematically reviews the empirical social science literature on farmer adoption of soil carbon sequestration practices and participation in carbon markets or programs. The article finds thirty-seven studies over the past decade that involve empirical research with soil carbon sequestering practices in a climate context, with just over a quarter of those focusing on the Global South. A central finding is co-benefits are a strong motivator for adoption, especially given minimal carbon policies and low carbon prices. Other themes in the literature include educational and cultural barriers to adoption, the difference between developing and developed world contexts, and policy preferences among farmers for soil carbon sequestration incentives. However, we argue that given the rising profile of technical potentials and carbon credits, this peer-reviewed literature on the social aspects of scaling soil carbon sequestration is quite limited. We discuss why the social science literature is so small, and what this research gap means for efforts to achieve higher levels of soil carbon sequestration. We conclude with a ten-point social science research agenda for social science on soil carbon—and some cautions about centering carbon too strongly in research and policy. Soil carbon Farmers Adoption Carbon removal Negative emissions Social science Palumbo-Compton, Alexis aut Enthalten in Biogeochemistry Springer International Publishing, 1984 161(2022), 1 vom: 30. Aug., Seite 59-70 (DE-627)12916786X (DE-600)50671-0 (DE-576)014454904 0168-2563 nnns volume:161 year:2022 number:1 day:30 month:08 pages:59-70 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_70 AR 161 2022 1 30 08 59-70 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2 doi (DE-627)OLC2079710370 (DE-He213)s10533-022-00948-2-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 550 VZ 13 ssgn Buck, Holly Jean verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-8940-1238 aut Soil carbon sequestration as a climate strategy: what do farmers think? 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2022 Abstract Countries and companies with net-zero emissions targets are considering carbon removal strategies to compensate for remaining greenhouse gas emissions. Soil carbon sequestration is one such carbon removal strategy, and policy and corporate interest is growing in figuring out how to motivate farmers to sequester more carbon. But how do farmers in various cultural and geographic contexts view soil carbon sequestration as a climate mitigation or carbon removal strategy? This article systematically reviews the empirical social science literature on farmer adoption of soil carbon sequestration practices and participation in carbon markets or programs. The article finds thirty-seven studies over the past decade that involve empirical research with soil carbon sequestering practices in a climate context, with just over a quarter of those focusing on the Global South. A central finding is co-benefits are a strong motivator for adoption, especially given minimal carbon policies and low carbon prices. Other themes in the literature include educational and cultural barriers to adoption, the difference between developing and developed world contexts, and policy preferences among farmers for soil carbon sequestration incentives. However, we argue that given the rising profile of technical potentials and carbon credits, this peer-reviewed literature on the social aspects of scaling soil carbon sequestration is quite limited. We discuss why the social science literature is so small, and what this research gap means for efforts to achieve higher levels of soil carbon sequestration. We conclude with a ten-point social science research agenda for social science on soil carbon—and some cautions about centering carbon too strongly in research and policy. Soil carbon Farmers Adoption Carbon removal Negative emissions Social science Palumbo-Compton, Alexis aut Enthalten in Biogeochemistry Springer International Publishing, 1984 161(2022), 1 vom: 30. Aug., Seite 59-70 (DE-627)12916786X (DE-600)50671-0 (DE-576)014454904 0168-2563 nnns volume:161 year:2022 number:1 day:30 month:08 pages:59-70 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_70 AR 161 2022 1 30 08 59-70 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2 doi (DE-627)OLC2079710370 (DE-He213)s10533-022-00948-2-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 550 VZ 13 ssgn Buck, Holly Jean verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-8940-1238 aut Soil carbon sequestration as a climate strategy: what do farmers think? 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2022 Abstract Countries and companies with net-zero emissions targets are considering carbon removal strategies to compensate for remaining greenhouse gas emissions. Soil carbon sequestration is one such carbon removal strategy, and policy and corporate interest is growing in figuring out how to motivate farmers to sequester more carbon. But how do farmers in various cultural and geographic contexts view soil carbon sequestration as a climate mitigation or carbon removal strategy? This article systematically reviews the empirical social science literature on farmer adoption of soil carbon sequestration practices and participation in carbon markets or programs. The article finds thirty-seven studies over the past decade that involve empirical research with soil carbon sequestering practices in a climate context, with just over a quarter of those focusing on the Global South. A central finding is co-benefits are a strong motivator for adoption, especially given minimal carbon policies and low carbon prices. Other themes in the literature include educational and cultural barriers to adoption, the difference between developing and developed world contexts, and policy preferences among farmers for soil carbon sequestration incentives. However, we argue that given the rising profile of technical potentials and carbon credits, this peer-reviewed literature on the social aspects of scaling soil carbon sequestration is quite limited. We discuss why the social science literature is so small, and what this research gap means for efforts to achieve higher levels of soil carbon sequestration. We conclude with a ten-point social science research agenda for social science on soil carbon—and some cautions about centering carbon too strongly in research and policy. Soil carbon Farmers Adoption Carbon removal Negative emissions Social science Palumbo-Compton, Alexis aut Enthalten in Biogeochemistry Springer International Publishing, 1984 161(2022), 1 vom: 30. Aug., Seite 59-70 (DE-627)12916786X (DE-600)50671-0 (DE-576)014454904 0168-2563 nnns volume:161 year:2022 number:1 day:30 month:08 pages:59-70 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_70 AR 161 2022 1 30 08 59-70 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2 doi (DE-627)OLC2079710370 (DE-He213)s10533-022-00948-2-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 550 VZ 13 ssgn Buck, Holly Jean verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-8940-1238 aut Soil carbon sequestration as a climate strategy: what do farmers think? 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2022 Abstract Countries and companies with net-zero emissions targets are considering carbon removal strategies to compensate for remaining greenhouse gas emissions. Soil carbon sequestration is one such carbon removal strategy, and policy and corporate interest is growing in figuring out how to motivate farmers to sequester more carbon. But how do farmers in various cultural and geographic contexts view soil carbon sequestration as a climate mitigation or carbon removal strategy? This article systematically reviews the empirical social science literature on farmer adoption of soil carbon sequestration practices and participation in carbon markets or programs. The article finds thirty-seven studies over the past decade that involve empirical research with soil carbon sequestering practices in a climate context, with just over a quarter of those focusing on the Global South. A central finding is co-benefits are a strong motivator for adoption, especially given minimal carbon policies and low carbon prices. Other themes in the literature include educational and cultural barriers to adoption, the difference between developing and developed world contexts, and policy preferences among farmers for soil carbon sequestration incentives. However, we argue that given the rising profile of technical potentials and carbon credits, this peer-reviewed literature on the social aspects of scaling soil carbon sequestration is quite limited. We discuss why the social science literature is so small, and what this research gap means for efforts to achieve higher levels of soil carbon sequestration. We conclude with a ten-point social science research agenda for social science on soil carbon—and some cautions about centering carbon too strongly in research and policy. Soil carbon Farmers Adoption Carbon removal Negative emissions Social science Palumbo-Compton, Alexis aut Enthalten in Biogeochemistry Springer International Publishing, 1984 161(2022), 1 vom: 30. Aug., Seite 59-70 (DE-627)12916786X (DE-600)50671-0 (DE-576)014454904 0168-2563 nnns volume:161 year:2022 number:1 day:30 month:08 pages:59-70 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_70 AR 161 2022 1 30 08 59-70 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2 doi (DE-627)OLC2079710370 (DE-He213)s10533-022-00948-2-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 550 VZ 13 ssgn Buck, Holly Jean verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-8940-1238 aut Soil carbon sequestration as a climate strategy: what do farmers think? 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2022 Abstract Countries and companies with net-zero emissions targets are considering carbon removal strategies to compensate for remaining greenhouse gas emissions. Soil carbon sequestration is one such carbon removal strategy, and policy and corporate interest is growing in figuring out how to motivate farmers to sequester more carbon. But how do farmers in various cultural and geographic contexts view soil carbon sequestration as a climate mitigation or carbon removal strategy? This article systematically reviews the empirical social science literature on farmer adoption of soil carbon sequestration practices and participation in carbon markets or programs. The article finds thirty-seven studies over the past decade that involve empirical research with soil carbon sequestering practices in a climate context, with just over a quarter of those focusing on the Global South. A central finding is co-benefits are a strong motivator for adoption, especially given minimal carbon policies and low carbon prices. Other themes in the literature include educational and cultural barriers to adoption, the difference between developing and developed world contexts, and policy preferences among farmers for soil carbon sequestration incentives. However, we argue that given the rising profile of technical potentials and carbon credits, this peer-reviewed literature on the social aspects of scaling soil carbon sequestration is quite limited. We discuss why the social science literature is so small, and what this research gap means for efforts to achieve higher levels of soil carbon sequestration. We conclude with a ten-point social science research agenda for social science on soil carbon—and some cautions about centering carbon too strongly in research and policy. Soil carbon Farmers Adoption Carbon removal Negative emissions Social science Palumbo-Compton, Alexis aut Enthalten in Biogeochemistry Springer International Publishing, 1984 161(2022), 1 vom: 30. Aug., Seite 59-70 (DE-627)12916786X (DE-600)50671-0 (DE-576)014454904 0168-2563 nnns volume:161 year:2022 number:1 day:30 month:08 pages:59-70 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_70 AR 161 2022 1 30 08 59-70 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Biogeochemistry 161(2022), 1 vom: 30. Aug., Seite 59-70 volume:161 year:2022 number:1 day:30 month:08 pages:59-70 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Biogeochemistry 161(2022), 1 vom: 30. Aug., Seite 59-70 volume:161 year:2022 number:1 day:30 month:08 pages:59-70 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Soil carbon Farmers Adoption Carbon removal Negative emissions Social science |
| dewey-raw |
540 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Biogeochemistry |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Buck, Holly Jean @@aut@@ Palumbo-Compton, Alexis @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-08-30T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
12916786X |
| dewey-sort |
3540 |
| id |
OLC2079710370 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2079710370</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230516084258.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221221s2022 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2079710370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10533-022-00948-2-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">13</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Buck, Holly Jean</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-8940-1238</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Soil carbon sequestration as a climate strategy: what do farmers think?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Countries and companies with net-zero emissions targets are considering carbon removal strategies to compensate for remaining greenhouse gas emissions. Soil carbon sequestration is one such carbon removal strategy, and policy and corporate interest is growing in figuring out how to motivate farmers to sequester more carbon. But how do farmers in various cultural and geographic contexts view soil carbon sequestration as a climate mitigation or carbon removal strategy? This article systematically reviews the empirical social science literature on farmer adoption of soil carbon sequestration practices and participation in carbon markets or programs. The article finds thirty-seven studies over the past decade that involve empirical research with soil carbon sequestering practices in a climate context, with just over a quarter of those focusing on the Global South. A central finding is co-benefits are a strong motivator for adoption, especially given minimal carbon policies and low carbon prices. Other themes in the literature include educational and cultural barriers to adoption, the difference between developing and developed world contexts, and policy preferences among farmers for soil carbon sequestration incentives. However, we argue that given the rising profile of technical potentials and carbon credits, this peer-reviewed literature on the social aspects of scaling soil carbon sequestration is quite limited. We discuss why the social science literature is so small, and what this research gap means for efforts to achieve higher levels of soil carbon sequestration. We conclude with a ten-point social science research agenda for social science on soil carbon—and some cautions about centering carbon too strongly in research and policy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Soil carbon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Farmers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Adoption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Carbon removal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Negative emissions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Palumbo-Compton, Alexis</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Biogeochemistry</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer International Publishing, 1984</subfield><subfield code="g">161(2022), 1 vom: 30. Aug., Seite 59-70</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)12916786X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)50671-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014454904</subfield><subfield code="x">0168-2563</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:161</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:30</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:59-70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">161</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">30</subfield><subfield code="c">08</subfield><subfield code="h">59-70</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Buck, Holly Jean |
| spellingShingle |
Buck, Holly Jean ddc 540 ssgn 13 misc Soil carbon misc Farmers misc Adoption misc Carbon removal misc Negative emissions misc Social science Soil carbon sequestration as a climate strategy: what do farmers think? |
| authorStr |
Buck, Holly Jean |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)12916786X |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
540 - Chemistry & allied sciences 550 - Earth sciences |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0168-2563 |
| topic_title |
540 550 VZ 13 ssgn Soil carbon sequestration as a climate strategy: what do farmers think? Soil carbon Farmers Adoption Carbon removal Negative emissions Social science |
| topic |
ddc 540 ssgn 13 misc Soil carbon misc Farmers misc Adoption misc Carbon removal misc Negative emissions misc Social science |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 540 ssgn 13 misc Soil carbon misc Farmers misc Adoption misc Carbon removal misc Negative emissions misc Social science |
| topic_browse |
ddc 540 ssgn 13 misc Soil carbon misc Farmers misc Adoption misc Carbon removal misc Negative emissions misc Social science |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Biogeochemistry |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
12916786X |
| dewey-tens |
540 - Chemistry 550 - Earth sciences & geology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Biogeochemistry |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)12916786X (DE-600)50671-0 (DE-576)014454904 |
| title |
Soil carbon sequestration as a climate strategy: what do farmers think? |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2079710370 (DE-He213)s10533-022-00948-2-p |
| title_full |
Soil carbon sequestration as a climate strategy: what do farmers think? |
| author_sort |
Buck, Holly Jean |
| journal |
Biogeochemistry |
| journalStr |
Biogeochemistry |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
59 |
| author_browse |
Buck, Holly Jean Palumbo-Compton, Alexis |
| container_volume |
161 |
| class |
540 550 VZ 13 ssgn |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Buck, Holly Jean |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2 |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0001-8940-1238 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0001-8940-1238 |
| dewey-full |
540 550 |
| title_sort |
soil carbon sequestration as a climate strategy: what do farmers think? |
| title_auth |
Soil carbon sequestration as a climate strategy: what do farmers think? |
| abstract |
Abstract Countries and companies with net-zero emissions targets are considering carbon removal strategies to compensate for remaining greenhouse gas emissions. Soil carbon sequestration is one such carbon removal strategy, and policy and corporate interest is growing in figuring out how to motivate farmers to sequester more carbon. But how do farmers in various cultural and geographic contexts view soil carbon sequestration as a climate mitigation or carbon removal strategy? This article systematically reviews the empirical social science literature on farmer adoption of soil carbon sequestration practices and participation in carbon markets or programs. The article finds thirty-seven studies over the past decade that involve empirical research with soil carbon sequestering practices in a climate context, with just over a quarter of those focusing on the Global South. A central finding is co-benefits are a strong motivator for adoption, especially given minimal carbon policies and low carbon prices. Other themes in the literature include educational and cultural barriers to adoption, the difference between developing and developed world contexts, and policy preferences among farmers for soil carbon sequestration incentives. However, we argue that given the rising profile of technical potentials and carbon credits, this peer-reviewed literature on the social aspects of scaling soil carbon sequestration is quite limited. We discuss why the social science literature is so small, and what this research gap means for efforts to achieve higher levels of soil carbon sequestration. We conclude with a ten-point social science research agenda for social science on soil carbon—and some cautions about centering carbon too strongly in research and policy. © The Author(s) 2022 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Countries and companies with net-zero emissions targets are considering carbon removal strategies to compensate for remaining greenhouse gas emissions. Soil carbon sequestration is one such carbon removal strategy, and policy and corporate interest is growing in figuring out how to motivate farmers to sequester more carbon. But how do farmers in various cultural and geographic contexts view soil carbon sequestration as a climate mitigation or carbon removal strategy? This article systematically reviews the empirical social science literature on farmer adoption of soil carbon sequestration practices and participation in carbon markets or programs. The article finds thirty-seven studies over the past decade that involve empirical research with soil carbon sequestering practices in a climate context, with just over a quarter of those focusing on the Global South. A central finding is co-benefits are a strong motivator for adoption, especially given minimal carbon policies and low carbon prices. Other themes in the literature include educational and cultural barriers to adoption, the difference between developing and developed world contexts, and policy preferences among farmers for soil carbon sequestration incentives. However, we argue that given the rising profile of technical potentials and carbon credits, this peer-reviewed literature on the social aspects of scaling soil carbon sequestration is quite limited. We discuss why the social science literature is so small, and what this research gap means for efforts to achieve higher levels of soil carbon sequestration. We conclude with a ten-point social science research agenda for social science on soil carbon—and some cautions about centering carbon too strongly in research and policy. © The Author(s) 2022 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Countries and companies with net-zero emissions targets are considering carbon removal strategies to compensate for remaining greenhouse gas emissions. Soil carbon sequestration is one such carbon removal strategy, and policy and corporate interest is growing in figuring out how to motivate farmers to sequester more carbon. But how do farmers in various cultural and geographic contexts view soil carbon sequestration as a climate mitigation or carbon removal strategy? This article systematically reviews the empirical social science literature on farmer adoption of soil carbon sequestration practices and participation in carbon markets or programs. The article finds thirty-seven studies over the past decade that involve empirical research with soil carbon sequestering practices in a climate context, with just over a quarter of those focusing on the Global South. A central finding is co-benefits are a strong motivator for adoption, especially given minimal carbon policies and low carbon prices. Other themes in the literature include educational and cultural barriers to adoption, the difference between developing and developed world contexts, and policy preferences among farmers for soil carbon sequestration incentives. However, we argue that given the rising profile of technical potentials and carbon credits, this peer-reviewed literature on the social aspects of scaling soil carbon sequestration is quite limited. We discuss why the social science literature is so small, and what this research gap means for efforts to achieve higher levels of soil carbon sequestration. We conclude with a ten-point social science research agenda for social science on soil carbon—and some cautions about centering carbon too strongly in research and policy. © The Author(s) 2022 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_70 |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Soil carbon sequestration as a climate strategy: what do farmers think? |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Palumbo-Compton, Alexis |
| author2Str |
Palumbo-Compton, Alexis |
| ppnlink |
12916786X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T01:51:35.976Z |
| _version_ |
1803611428331978752 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2079710370</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230516084258.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221221s2022 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2079710370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10533-022-00948-2-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">13</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Buck, Holly Jean</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-8940-1238</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Soil carbon sequestration as a climate strategy: what do farmers think?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Countries and companies with net-zero emissions targets are considering carbon removal strategies to compensate for remaining greenhouse gas emissions. Soil carbon sequestration is one such carbon removal strategy, and policy and corporate interest is growing in figuring out how to motivate farmers to sequester more carbon. But how do farmers in various cultural and geographic contexts view soil carbon sequestration as a climate mitigation or carbon removal strategy? This article systematically reviews the empirical social science literature on farmer adoption of soil carbon sequestration practices and participation in carbon markets or programs. The article finds thirty-seven studies over the past decade that involve empirical research with soil carbon sequestering practices in a climate context, with just over a quarter of those focusing on the Global South. A central finding is co-benefits are a strong motivator for adoption, especially given minimal carbon policies and low carbon prices. Other themes in the literature include educational and cultural barriers to adoption, the difference between developing and developed world contexts, and policy preferences among farmers for soil carbon sequestration incentives. However, we argue that given the rising profile of technical potentials and carbon credits, this peer-reviewed literature on the social aspects of scaling soil carbon sequestration is quite limited. We discuss why the social science literature is so small, and what this research gap means for efforts to achieve higher levels of soil carbon sequestration. We conclude with a ten-point social science research agenda for social science on soil carbon—and some cautions about centering carbon too strongly in research and policy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Soil carbon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Farmers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Adoption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Carbon removal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Negative emissions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Palumbo-Compton, Alexis</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Biogeochemistry</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer International Publishing, 1984</subfield><subfield code="g">161(2022), 1 vom: 30. Aug., Seite 59-70</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)12916786X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)50671-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014454904</subfield><subfield code="x">0168-2563</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:161</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:30</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:59-70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">161</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">30</subfield><subfield code="c">08</subfield><subfield code="h">59-70</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.40141 |