Water spray cooling during handling of feedlot cattle
Abstract Activities involved in receiving or working (e.g., sorting, dehorning, castration, weighing, implanting, etc.) of feedlot cattle cause an increase in body temperature. During hot weather the increased body temperature may disrupt normal behaviors including eating, which can be especially de...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Brown-Brandl, Tami M. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2009 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© US Government 2009 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: International journal of biometeorology - Springer-Verlag, 1961, 54(2009), 6 vom: 04. Dez., Seite 609-616 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:54 ; year:2009 ; number:6 ; day:04 ; month:12 ; pages:609-616 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s00484-009-0282-8 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2106901801 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2106901801 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230502110825.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 230403s2009 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00484-009-0282-8 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2106901801 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s00484-009-0282-8-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |a 550 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 12 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a BIODIV |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Brown-Brandl, Tami M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Water spray cooling during handling of feedlot cattle |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © US Government 2009 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Activities involved in receiving or working (e.g., sorting, dehorning, castration, weighing, implanting, etc.) of feedlot cattle cause an increase in body temperature. During hot weather the increased body temperature may disrupt normal behaviors including eating, which can be especially detrimental to the well-being and performance of the animals. Sprinkle cooling of animals has been successfully employed within the pen; however, added moisture to the pens’ surface increases odor generation from the pen. A study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility instead of in the pen, which could potentially provide extra evaporative cooling to offset the added heat produced by activity. Sixty-four cross-bred heifers were assigned to one of eight pens on the basis of weight. On four separate occasions during hot conditions (average temperature 28.2 ± 1.9°C, 29.1 ± 2.0°C, 28.9 ± 3.0°C, and 26.8 ± 1.6°C; with the temperature ranging from 22.6 to 32.5°C during the trials), the heifers were moved from their pens to and from the working facility (a building with a scale and squeeze chute located 160–200 m away). While in the squeeze chute, four of the pens of heifers were sprinkle cooled and the remaining four pens were worked as normal. The heifers that were treated had a body temperature that peaked sooner (31.9 ± 0.63 min compared to 37.6 ± 0.62) with a lower peak body temperature (39.55 ± 0.03°C compared to 39.74 ± 0.03°C), and recovered sooner (70.5 ± 2.4 min compared to 83.2 ± 2.4 min). The treated animals also had a lower panting score, a visual assessment of level of cattle heat stress (1.1 ± 0.2 compared to 1.16 ± 0.2). The behavior measurements that were taken did not indicate a change in behavior. It was concluded that while a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility did not completely offset the increase in body temperature, it was beneficial to the animals without needing to add water to the pen surface, thus reducing the potential for odor generation. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Animal behavior | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Body temperature | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cattle | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Heat stress | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Spray cooling | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sprinkle cooling | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Eigenberg, Roger A. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nienaber, John A. |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of biometeorology |d Springer-Verlag, 1961 |g 54(2009), 6 vom: 04. Dez., Seite 609-616 |w (DE-627)12985106X |w (DE-600)280324-0 |w (DE-576)015150259 |x 0020-7128 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:54 |g year:2009 |g number:6 |g day:04 |g month:12 |g pages:609-616 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-009-0282-8 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-GEO | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-GGO | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2018 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4277 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4311 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 54 |j 2009 |e 6 |b 04 |c 12 |h 609-616 | ||
| author_variant |
t m b b tmb tmbb r a e ra rae j a n ja jan |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00207128:2009----::aesryolndrnhnlno |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2009 |
| publishDate |
2009 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s00484-009-0282-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2106901801 (DE-He213)s00484-009-0282-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 550 VZ 570 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Brown-Brandl, Tami M. verfasserin aut Water spray cooling during handling of feedlot cattle 2009 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © US Government 2009 Abstract Activities involved in receiving or working (e.g., sorting, dehorning, castration, weighing, implanting, etc.) of feedlot cattle cause an increase in body temperature. During hot weather the increased body temperature may disrupt normal behaviors including eating, which can be especially detrimental to the well-being and performance of the animals. Sprinkle cooling of animals has been successfully employed within the pen; however, added moisture to the pens’ surface increases odor generation from the pen. A study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility instead of in the pen, which could potentially provide extra evaporative cooling to offset the added heat produced by activity. Sixty-four cross-bred heifers were assigned to one of eight pens on the basis of weight. On four separate occasions during hot conditions (average temperature 28.2 ± 1.9°C, 29.1 ± 2.0°C, 28.9 ± 3.0°C, and 26.8 ± 1.6°C; with the temperature ranging from 22.6 to 32.5°C during the trials), the heifers were moved from their pens to and from the working facility (a building with a scale and squeeze chute located 160–200 m away). While in the squeeze chute, four of the pens of heifers were sprinkle cooled and the remaining four pens were worked as normal. The heifers that were treated had a body temperature that peaked sooner (31.9 ± 0.63 min compared to 37.6 ± 0.62) with a lower peak body temperature (39.55 ± 0.03°C compared to 39.74 ± 0.03°C), and recovered sooner (70.5 ± 2.4 min compared to 83.2 ± 2.4 min). The treated animals also had a lower panting score, a visual assessment of level of cattle heat stress (1.1 ± 0.2 compared to 1.16 ± 0.2). The behavior measurements that were taken did not indicate a change in behavior. It was concluded that while a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility did not completely offset the increase in body temperature, it was beneficial to the animals without needing to add water to the pen surface, thus reducing the potential for odor generation. Animal behavior Body temperature Cattle Heat stress Spray cooling Sprinkle cooling Eigenberg, Roger A. aut Nienaber, John A. aut Enthalten in International journal of biometeorology Springer-Verlag, 1961 54(2009), 6 vom: 04. Dez., Seite 609-616 (DE-627)12985106X (DE-600)280324-0 (DE-576)015150259 0020-7128 nnns volume:54 year:2009 number:6 day:04 month:12 pages:609-616 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-009-0282-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4311 AR 54 2009 6 04 12 609-616 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s00484-009-0282-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2106901801 (DE-He213)s00484-009-0282-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 550 VZ 570 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Brown-Brandl, Tami M. verfasserin aut Water spray cooling during handling of feedlot cattle 2009 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © US Government 2009 Abstract Activities involved in receiving or working (e.g., sorting, dehorning, castration, weighing, implanting, etc.) of feedlot cattle cause an increase in body temperature. During hot weather the increased body temperature may disrupt normal behaviors including eating, which can be especially detrimental to the well-being and performance of the animals. Sprinkle cooling of animals has been successfully employed within the pen; however, added moisture to the pens’ surface increases odor generation from the pen. A study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility instead of in the pen, which could potentially provide extra evaporative cooling to offset the added heat produced by activity. Sixty-four cross-bred heifers were assigned to one of eight pens on the basis of weight. On four separate occasions during hot conditions (average temperature 28.2 ± 1.9°C, 29.1 ± 2.0°C, 28.9 ± 3.0°C, and 26.8 ± 1.6°C; with the temperature ranging from 22.6 to 32.5°C during the trials), the heifers were moved from their pens to and from the working facility (a building with a scale and squeeze chute located 160–200 m away). While in the squeeze chute, four of the pens of heifers were sprinkle cooled and the remaining four pens were worked as normal. The heifers that were treated had a body temperature that peaked sooner (31.9 ± 0.63 min compared to 37.6 ± 0.62) with a lower peak body temperature (39.55 ± 0.03°C compared to 39.74 ± 0.03°C), and recovered sooner (70.5 ± 2.4 min compared to 83.2 ± 2.4 min). The treated animals also had a lower panting score, a visual assessment of level of cattle heat stress (1.1 ± 0.2 compared to 1.16 ± 0.2). The behavior measurements that were taken did not indicate a change in behavior. It was concluded that while a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility did not completely offset the increase in body temperature, it was beneficial to the animals without needing to add water to the pen surface, thus reducing the potential for odor generation. Animal behavior Body temperature Cattle Heat stress Spray cooling Sprinkle cooling Eigenberg, Roger A. aut Nienaber, John A. aut Enthalten in International journal of biometeorology Springer-Verlag, 1961 54(2009), 6 vom: 04. Dez., Seite 609-616 (DE-627)12985106X (DE-600)280324-0 (DE-576)015150259 0020-7128 nnns volume:54 year:2009 number:6 day:04 month:12 pages:609-616 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-009-0282-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4311 AR 54 2009 6 04 12 609-616 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s00484-009-0282-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2106901801 (DE-He213)s00484-009-0282-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 550 VZ 570 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Brown-Brandl, Tami M. verfasserin aut Water spray cooling during handling of feedlot cattle 2009 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © US Government 2009 Abstract Activities involved in receiving or working (e.g., sorting, dehorning, castration, weighing, implanting, etc.) of feedlot cattle cause an increase in body temperature. During hot weather the increased body temperature may disrupt normal behaviors including eating, which can be especially detrimental to the well-being and performance of the animals. Sprinkle cooling of animals has been successfully employed within the pen; however, added moisture to the pens’ surface increases odor generation from the pen. A study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility instead of in the pen, which could potentially provide extra evaporative cooling to offset the added heat produced by activity. Sixty-four cross-bred heifers were assigned to one of eight pens on the basis of weight. On four separate occasions during hot conditions (average temperature 28.2 ± 1.9°C, 29.1 ± 2.0°C, 28.9 ± 3.0°C, and 26.8 ± 1.6°C; with the temperature ranging from 22.6 to 32.5°C during the trials), the heifers were moved from their pens to and from the working facility (a building with a scale and squeeze chute located 160–200 m away). While in the squeeze chute, four of the pens of heifers were sprinkle cooled and the remaining four pens were worked as normal. The heifers that were treated had a body temperature that peaked sooner (31.9 ± 0.63 min compared to 37.6 ± 0.62) with a lower peak body temperature (39.55 ± 0.03°C compared to 39.74 ± 0.03°C), and recovered sooner (70.5 ± 2.4 min compared to 83.2 ± 2.4 min). The treated animals also had a lower panting score, a visual assessment of level of cattle heat stress (1.1 ± 0.2 compared to 1.16 ± 0.2). The behavior measurements that were taken did not indicate a change in behavior. It was concluded that while a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility did not completely offset the increase in body temperature, it was beneficial to the animals without needing to add water to the pen surface, thus reducing the potential for odor generation. Animal behavior Body temperature Cattle Heat stress Spray cooling Sprinkle cooling Eigenberg, Roger A. aut Nienaber, John A. aut Enthalten in International journal of biometeorology Springer-Verlag, 1961 54(2009), 6 vom: 04. Dez., Seite 609-616 (DE-627)12985106X (DE-600)280324-0 (DE-576)015150259 0020-7128 nnns volume:54 year:2009 number:6 day:04 month:12 pages:609-616 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-009-0282-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4311 AR 54 2009 6 04 12 609-616 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s00484-009-0282-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2106901801 (DE-He213)s00484-009-0282-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 550 VZ 570 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Brown-Brandl, Tami M. verfasserin aut Water spray cooling during handling of feedlot cattle 2009 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © US Government 2009 Abstract Activities involved in receiving or working (e.g., sorting, dehorning, castration, weighing, implanting, etc.) of feedlot cattle cause an increase in body temperature. During hot weather the increased body temperature may disrupt normal behaviors including eating, which can be especially detrimental to the well-being and performance of the animals. Sprinkle cooling of animals has been successfully employed within the pen; however, added moisture to the pens’ surface increases odor generation from the pen. A study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility instead of in the pen, which could potentially provide extra evaporative cooling to offset the added heat produced by activity. Sixty-four cross-bred heifers were assigned to one of eight pens on the basis of weight. On four separate occasions during hot conditions (average temperature 28.2 ± 1.9°C, 29.1 ± 2.0°C, 28.9 ± 3.0°C, and 26.8 ± 1.6°C; with the temperature ranging from 22.6 to 32.5°C during the trials), the heifers were moved from their pens to and from the working facility (a building with a scale and squeeze chute located 160–200 m away). While in the squeeze chute, four of the pens of heifers were sprinkle cooled and the remaining four pens were worked as normal. The heifers that were treated had a body temperature that peaked sooner (31.9 ± 0.63 min compared to 37.6 ± 0.62) with a lower peak body temperature (39.55 ± 0.03°C compared to 39.74 ± 0.03°C), and recovered sooner (70.5 ± 2.4 min compared to 83.2 ± 2.4 min). The treated animals also had a lower panting score, a visual assessment of level of cattle heat stress (1.1 ± 0.2 compared to 1.16 ± 0.2). The behavior measurements that were taken did not indicate a change in behavior. It was concluded that while a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility did not completely offset the increase in body temperature, it was beneficial to the animals without needing to add water to the pen surface, thus reducing the potential for odor generation. Animal behavior Body temperature Cattle Heat stress Spray cooling Sprinkle cooling Eigenberg, Roger A. aut Nienaber, John A. aut Enthalten in International journal of biometeorology Springer-Verlag, 1961 54(2009), 6 vom: 04. Dez., Seite 609-616 (DE-627)12985106X (DE-600)280324-0 (DE-576)015150259 0020-7128 nnns volume:54 year:2009 number:6 day:04 month:12 pages:609-616 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-009-0282-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4311 AR 54 2009 6 04 12 609-616 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s00484-009-0282-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2106901801 (DE-He213)s00484-009-0282-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 550 VZ 570 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Brown-Brandl, Tami M. verfasserin aut Water spray cooling during handling of feedlot cattle 2009 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © US Government 2009 Abstract Activities involved in receiving or working (e.g., sorting, dehorning, castration, weighing, implanting, etc.) of feedlot cattle cause an increase in body temperature. During hot weather the increased body temperature may disrupt normal behaviors including eating, which can be especially detrimental to the well-being and performance of the animals. Sprinkle cooling of animals has been successfully employed within the pen; however, added moisture to the pens’ surface increases odor generation from the pen. A study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility instead of in the pen, which could potentially provide extra evaporative cooling to offset the added heat produced by activity. Sixty-four cross-bred heifers were assigned to one of eight pens on the basis of weight. On four separate occasions during hot conditions (average temperature 28.2 ± 1.9°C, 29.1 ± 2.0°C, 28.9 ± 3.0°C, and 26.8 ± 1.6°C; with the temperature ranging from 22.6 to 32.5°C during the trials), the heifers were moved from their pens to and from the working facility (a building with a scale and squeeze chute located 160–200 m away). While in the squeeze chute, four of the pens of heifers were sprinkle cooled and the remaining four pens were worked as normal. The heifers that were treated had a body temperature that peaked sooner (31.9 ± 0.63 min compared to 37.6 ± 0.62) with a lower peak body temperature (39.55 ± 0.03°C compared to 39.74 ± 0.03°C), and recovered sooner (70.5 ± 2.4 min compared to 83.2 ± 2.4 min). The treated animals also had a lower panting score, a visual assessment of level of cattle heat stress (1.1 ± 0.2 compared to 1.16 ± 0.2). The behavior measurements that were taken did not indicate a change in behavior. It was concluded that while a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility did not completely offset the increase in body temperature, it was beneficial to the animals without needing to add water to the pen surface, thus reducing the potential for odor generation. Animal behavior Body temperature Cattle Heat stress Spray cooling Sprinkle cooling Eigenberg, Roger A. aut Nienaber, John A. aut Enthalten in International journal of biometeorology Springer-Verlag, 1961 54(2009), 6 vom: 04. Dez., Seite 609-616 (DE-627)12985106X (DE-600)280324-0 (DE-576)015150259 0020-7128 nnns volume:54 year:2009 number:6 day:04 month:12 pages:609-616 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-009-0282-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4311 AR 54 2009 6 04 12 609-616 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in International journal of biometeorology 54(2009), 6 vom: 04. Dez., Seite 609-616 volume:54 year:2009 number:6 day:04 month:12 pages:609-616 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in International journal of biometeorology 54(2009), 6 vom: 04. Dez., Seite 609-616 volume:54 year:2009 number:6 day:04 month:12 pages:609-616 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Animal behavior Body temperature Cattle Heat stress Spray cooling Sprinkle cooling |
| dewey-raw |
570 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
International journal of biometeorology |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Brown-Brandl, Tami M. @@aut@@ Eigenberg, Roger A. @@aut@@ Nienaber, John A. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2009-12-04T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
12985106X |
| dewey-sort |
3570 |
| id |
OLC2106901801 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2106901801</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502110825.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230403s2009 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00484-009-0282-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2106901801</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s00484-009-0282-8-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brown-Brandl, Tami M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Water spray cooling during handling of feedlot cattle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© US Government 2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Activities involved in receiving or working (e.g., sorting, dehorning, castration, weighing, implanting, etc.) of feedlot cattle cause an increase in body temperature. During hot weather the increased body temperature may disrupt normal behaviors including eating, which can be especially detrimental to the well-being and performance of the animals. Sprinkle cooling of animals has been successfully employed within the pen; however, added moisture to the pens’ surface increases odor generation from the pen. A study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility instead of in the pen, which could potentially provide extra evaporative cooling to offset the added heat produced by activity. Sixty-four cross-bred heifers were assigned to one of eight pens on the basis of weight. On four separate occasions during hot conditions (average temperature 28.2 ± 1.9°C, 29.1 ± 2.0°C, 28.9 ± 3.0°C, and 26.8 ± 1.6°C; with the temperature ranging from 22.6 to 32.5°C during the trials), the heifers were moved from their pens to and from the working facility (a building with a scale and squeeze chute located 160–200 m away). While in the squeeze chute, four of the pens of heifers were sprinkle cooled and the remaining four pens were worked as normal. The heifers that were treated had a body temperature that peaked sooner (31.9 ± 0.63 min compared to 37.6 ± 0.62) with a lower peak body temperature (39.55 ± 0.03°C compared to 39.74 ± 0.03°C), and recovered sooner (70.5 ± 2.4 min compared to 83.2 ± 2.4 min). The treated animals also had a lower panting score, a visual assessment of level of cattle heat stress (1.1 ± 0.2 compared to 1.16 ± 0.2). The behavior measurements that were taken did not indicate a change in behavior. It was concluded that while a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility did not completely offset the increase in body temperature, it was beneficial to the animals without needing to add water to the pen surface, thus reducing the potential for odor generation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Animal behavior</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Body temperature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cattle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Heat stress</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Spray cooling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sprinkle cooling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eigenberg, Roger A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nienaber, John A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of biometeorology</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1961</subfield><subfield code="g">54(2009), 6 vom: 04. Dez., Seite 609-616</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)12985106X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)280324-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015150259</subfield><subfield code="x">0020-7128</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:54</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2009</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:04</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:609-616</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-009-0282-8</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4311</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">54</subfield><subfield code="j">2009</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="b">04</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">609-616</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Brown-Brandl, Tami M. |
| spellingShingle |
Brown-Brandl, Tami M. ddc 570 ssgn 12 fid BIODIV misc Animal behavior misc Body temperature misc Cattle misc Heat stress misc Spray cooling misc Sprinkle cooling Water spray cooling during handling of feedlot cattle |
| authorStr |
Brown-Brandl, Tami M. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)12985106X |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
570 - Life sciences; biology 550 - Earth sciences |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0020-7128 |
| topic_title |
570 550 VZ 570 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Water spray cooling during handling of feedlot cattle Animal behavior Body temperature Cattle Heat stress Spray cooling Sprinkle cooling |
| topic |
ddc 570 ssgn 12 fid BIODIV misc Animal behavior misc Body temperature misc Cattle misc Heat stress misc Spray cooling misc Sprinkle cooling |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 570 ssgn 12 fid BIODIV misc Animal behavior misc Body temperature misc Cattle misc Heat stress misc Spray cooling misc Sprinkle cooling |
| topic_browse |
ddc 570 ssgn 12 fid BIODIV misc Animal behavior misc Body temperature misc Cattle misc Heat stress misc Spray cooling misc Sprinkle cooling |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
International journal of biometeorology |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
12985106X |
| dewey-tens |
570 - Life sciences; biology 550 - Earth sciences & geology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
International journal of biometeorology |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)12985106X (DE-600)280324-0 (DE-576)015150259 |
| title |
Water spray cooling during handling of feedlot cattle |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2106901801 (DE-He213)s00484-009-0282-8-p |
| title_full |
Water spray cooling during handling of feedlot cattle |
| author_sort |
Brown-Brandl, Tami M. |
| journal |
International journal of biometeorology |
| journalStr |
International journal of biometeorology |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2009 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
609 |
| author_browse |
Brown-Brandl, Tami M. Eigenberg, Roger A. Nienaber, John A. |
| container_volume |
54 |
| class |
570 550 VZ 570 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Brown-Brandl, Tami M. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s00484-009-0282-8 |
| dewey-full |
570 550 |
| title_sort |
water spray cooling during handling of feedlot cattle |
| title_auth |
Water spray cooling during handling of feedlot cattle |
| abstract |
Abstract Activities involved in receiving or working (e.g., sorting, dehorning, castration, weighing, implanting, etc.) of feedlot cattle cause an increase in body temperature. During hot weather the increased body temperature may disrupt normal behaviors including eating, which can be especially detrimental to the well-being and performance of the animals. Sprinkle cooling of animals has been successfully employed within the pen; however, added moisture to the pens’ surface increases odor generation from the pen. A study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility instead of in the pen, which could potentially provide extra evaporative cooling to offset the added heat produced by activity. Sixty-four cross-bred heifers were assigned to one of eight pens on the basis of weight. On four separate occasions during hot conditions (average temperature 28.2 ± 1.9°C, 29.1 ± 2.0°C, 28.9 ± 3.0°C, and 26.8 ± 1.6°C; with the temperature ranging from 22.6 to 32.5°C during the trials), the heifers were moved from their pens to and from the working facility (a building with a scale and squeeze chute located 160–200 m away). While in the squeeze chute, four of the pens of heifers were sprinkle cooled and the remaining four pens were worked as normal. The heifers that were treated had a body temperature that peaked sooner (31.9 ± 0.63 min compared to 37.6 ± 0.62) with a lower peak body temperature (39.55 ± 0.03°C compared to 39.74 ± 0.03°C), and recovered sooner (70.5 ± 2.4 min compared to 83.2 ± 2.4 min). The treated animals also had a lower panting score, a visual assessment of level of cattle heat stress (1.1 ± 0.2 compared to 1.16 ± 0.2). The behavior measurements that were taken did not indicate a change in behavior. It was concluded that while a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility did not completely offset the increase in body temperature, it was beneficial to the animals without needing to add water to the pen surface, thus reducing the potential for odor generation. © US Government 2009 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Activities involved in receiving or working (e.g., sorting, dehorning, castration, weighing, implanting, etc.) of feedlot cattle cause an increase in body temperature. During hot weather the increased body temperature may disrupt normal behaviors including eating, which can be especially detrimental to the well-being and performance of the animals. Sprinkle cooling of animals has been successfully employed within the pen; however, added moisture to the pens’ surface increases odor generation from the pen. A study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility instead of in the pen, which could potentially provide extra evaporative cooling to offset the added heat produced by activity. Sixty-four cross-bred heifers were assigned to one of eight pens on the basis of weight. On four separate occasions during hot conditions (average temperature 28.2 ± 1.9°C, 29.1 ± 2.0°C, 28.9 ± 3.0°C, and 26.8 ± 1.6°C; with the temperature ranging from 22.6 to 32.5°C during the trials), the heifers were moved from their pens to and from the working facility (a building with a scale and squeeze chute located 160–200 m away). While in the squeeze chute, four of the pens of heifers were sprinkle cooled and the remaining four pens were worked as normal. The heifers that were treated had a body temperature that peaked sooner (31.9 ± 0.63 min compared to 37.6 ± 0.62) with a lower peak body temperature (39.55 ± 0.03°C compared to 39.74 ± 0.03°C), and recovered sooner (70.5 ± 2.4 min compared to 83.2 ± 2.4 min). The treated animals also had a lower panting score, a visual assessment of level of cattle heat stress (1.1 ± 0.2 compared to 1.16 ± 0.2). The behavior measurements that were taken did not indicate a change in behavior. It was concluded that while a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility did not completely offset the increase in body temperature, it was beneficial to the animals without needing to add water to the pen surface, thus reducing the potential for odor generation. © US Government 2009 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Activities involved in receiving or working (e.g., sorting, dehorning, castration, weighing, implanting, etc.) of feedlot cattle cause an increase in body temperature. During hot weather the increased body temperature may disrupt normal behaviors including eating, which can be especially detrimental to the well-being and performance of the animals. Sprinkle cooling of animals has been successfully employed within the pen; however, added moisture to the pens’ surface increases odor generation from the pen. A study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility instead of in the pen, which could potentially provide extra evaporative cooling to offset the added heat produced by activity. Sixty-four cross-bred heifers were assigned to one of eight pens on the basis of weight. On four separate occasions during hot conditions (average temperature 28.2 ± 1.9°C, 29.1 ± 2.0°C, 28.9 ± 3.0°C, and 26.8 ± 1.6°C; with the temperature ranging from 22.6 to 32.5°C during the trials), the heifers were moved from their pens to and from the working facility (a building with a scale and squeeze chute located 160–200 m away). While in the squeeze chute, four of the pens of heifers were sprinkle cooled and the remaining four pens were worked as normal. The heifers that were treated had a body temperature that peaked sooner (31.9 ± 0.63 min compared to 37.6 ± 0.62) with a lower peak body temperature (39.55 ± 0.03°C compared to 39.74 ± 0.03°C), and recovered sooner (70.5 ± 2.4 min compared to 83.2 ± 2.4 min). The treated animals also had a lower panting score, a visual assessment of level of cattle heat stress (1.1 ± 0.2 compared to 1.16 ± 0.2). The behavior measurements that were taken did not indicate a change in behavior. It was concluded that while a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility did not completely offset the increase in body temperature, it was beneficial to the animals without needing to add water to the pen surface, thus reducing the potential for odor generation. © US Government 2009 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4311 |
| container_issue |
6 |
| title_short |
Water spray cooling during handling of feedlot cattle |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-009-0282-8 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Eigenberg, Roger A. Nienaber, John A. |
| author2Str |
Eigenberg, Roger A. Nienaber, John A. |
| ppnlink |
12985106X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s00484-009-0282-8 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T08:21:34.288Z |
| _version_ |
1803635963245625344 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2106901801</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502110825.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230403s2009 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00484-009-0282-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2106901801</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s00484-009-0282-8-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brown-Brandl, Tami M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Water spray cooling during handling of feedlot cattle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© US Government 2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Activities involved in receiving or working (e.g., sorting, dehorning, castration, weighing, implanting, etc.) of feedlot cattle cause an increase in body temperature. During hot weather the increased body temperature may disrupt normal behaviors including eating, which can be especially detrimental to the well-being and performance of the animals. Sprinkle cooling of animals has been successfully employed within the pen; however, added moisture to the pens’ surface increases odor generation from the pen. A study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility instead of in the pen, which could potentially provide extra evaporative cooling to offset the added heat produced by activity. Sixty-four cross-bred heifers were assigned to one of eight pens on the basis of weight. On four separate occasions during hot conditions (average temperature 28.2 ± 1.9°C, 29.1 ± 2.0°C, 28.9 ± 3.0°C, and 26.8 ± 1.6°C; with the temperature ranging from 22.6 to 32.5°C during the trials), the heifers were moved from their pens to and from the working facility (a building with a scale and squeeze chute located 160–200 m away). While in the squeeze chute, four of the pens of heifers were sprinkle cooled and the remaining four pens were worked as normal. The heifers that were treated had a body temperature that peaked sooner (31.9 ± 0.63 min compared to 37.6 ± 0.62) with a lower peak body temperature (39.55 ± 0.03°C compared to 39.74 ± 0.03°C), and recovered sooner (70.5 ± 2.4 min compared to 83.2 ± 2.4 min). The treated animals also had a lower panting score, a visual assessment of level of cattle heat stress (1.1 ± 0.2 compared to 1.16 ± 0.2). The behavior measurements that were taken did not indicate a change in behavior. It was concluded that while a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility did not completely offset the increase in body temperature, it was beneficial to the animals without needing to add water to the pen surface, thus reducing the potential for odor generation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Animal behavior</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Body temperature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cattle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Heat stress</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Spray cooling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sprinkle cooling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eigenberg, Roger A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nienaber, John A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of biometeorology</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1961</subfield><subfield code="g">54(2009), 6 vom: 04. Dez., Seite 609-616</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)12985106X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)280324-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015150259</subfield><subfield code="x">0020-7128</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:54</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2009</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:04</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:609-616</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-009-0282-8</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4311</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">54</subfield><subfield code="j">2009</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="b">04</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">609-616</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399276 |