Spatial and institutional characteristics of inland port development in China
Abstract This paper examines the spatial and institutional characteristics of the emerging trend of inland port development in China. The paper analyses a sample of 18 major inland ports in three geographical clusters, comparing observed issues with similar developments in Europe, the United States...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Monios, Jason [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2013 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Crown © 2013 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: GeoJournal - Springer Netherlands, 1977, 78(2013), 5 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 897-913 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:78 ; year:2013 ; number:5 ; day:08 ; month:02 ; pages:897-913 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2113690217 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2113690217 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503063016.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 230503s2013 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2113690217 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10708-013-9473-2-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 550 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 14 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a BIODIV |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Monios, Jason |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Spatial and institutional characteristics of inland port development in China |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Crown © 2013 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract This paper examines the spatial and institutional characteristics of the emerging trend of inland port development in China. The paper analyses a sample of 18 major inland ports in three geographical clusters, comparing observed issues with similar developments in Europe, the United States and Africa. It highlights the issues of customs clearance and intermodal transport, before an extended discussion on conflicting models of development based on the priorities of inland and port actors. The aim is first to provide a descriptive account of this development, and second to provide tentative explanations for these results by comparing the findings with similar developments in other countries. This task is aided by use of a conceptual framework drawn from the literature, in which port-driven and inland-driven inland ports are contrasted. Thus a supplementary aim of the paper is to develop the conceptual model of directional development in a new geographical context. Findings reveal the need to align development priorities of central and local governments, as well as clarifying the use of subsidies to a number of different inland ports which may potentially split economies of scale through increased competition for an overlapping hinterland. The paper demonstrates that, while in the past China’s seaports had less inland penetration compared to more mature systems, emerging trends suggest some similarities to patterns observed in more integrated networks such as Europe and North America. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Inland port | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Logistics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Freight | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Intermodal transport | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rail | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Policy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Planning | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Port authority | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Inland terminal | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Port competition | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Yuhong |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t GeoJournal |d Springer Netherlands, 1977 |g 78(2013), 5 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 897-913 |w (DE-627)13044555X |w (DE-600)715360-0 |w (DE-576)015981851 |x 0343-2521 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:78 |g year:2013 |g number:5 |g day:08 |g month:02 |g pages:897-913 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-GEO | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-GGO | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_267 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2018 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2315 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4311 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 78 |j 2013 |e 5 |b 08 |c 02 |h 897-913 | ||
| author_variant |
j m jm y w yw |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:03432521:2013----::ptaadntttoacaatrsisfnadot |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2013 |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2 doi (DE-627)OLC2113690217 (DE-He213)s10708-013-9473-2-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ 14 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Monios, Jason verfasserin aut Spatial and institutional characteristics of inland port development in China 2013 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Crown © 2013 Abstract This paper examines the spatial and institutional characteristics of the emerging trend of inland port development in China. The paper analyses a sample of 18 major inland ports in three geographical clusters, comparing observed issues with similar developments in Europe, the United States and Africa. It highlights the issues of customs clearance and intermodal transport, before an extended discussion on conflicting models of development based on the priorities of inland and port actors. The aim is first to provide a descriptive account of this development, and second to provide tentative explanations for these results by comparing the findings with similar developments in other countries. This task is aided by use of a conceptual framework drawn from the literature, in which port-driven and inland-driven inland ports are contrasted. Thus a supplementary aim of the paper is to develop the conceptual model of directional development in a new geographical context. Findings reveal the need to align development priorities of central and local governments, as well as clarifying the use of subsidies to a number of different inland ports which may potentially split economies of scale through increased competition for an overlapping hinterland. The paper demonstrates that, while in the past China’s seaports had less inland penetration compared to more mature systems, emerging trends suggest some similarities to patterns observed in more integrated networks such as Europe and North America. Inland port Logistics Freight Intermodal transport Rail Policy Planning Port authority Inland terminal Port competition Wang, Yuhong aut Enthalten in GeoJournal Springer Netherlands, 1977 78(2013), 5 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 897-913 (DE-627)13044555X (DE-600)715360-0 (DE-576)015981851 0343-2521 nnns volume:78 year:2013 number:5 day:08 month:02 pages:897-913 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2315 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4325 AR 78 2013 5 08 02 897-913 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2 doi (DE-627)OLC2113690217 (DE-He213)s10708-013-9473-2-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ 14 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Monios, Jason verfasserin aut Spatial and institutional characteristics of inland port development in China 2013 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Crown © 2013 Abstract This paper examines the spatial and institutional characteristics of the emerging trend of inland port development in China. The paper analyses a sample of 18 major inland ports in three geographical clusters, comparing observed issues with similar developments in Europe, the United States and Africa. It highlights the issues of customs clearance and intermodal transport, before an extended discussion on conflicting models of development based on the priorities of inland and port actors. The aim is first to provide a descriptive account of this development, and second to provide tentative explanations for these results by comparing the findings with similar developments in other countries. This task is aided by use of a conceptual framework drawn from the literature, in which port-driven and inland-driven inland ports are contrasted. Thus a supplementary aim of the paper is to develop the conceptual model of directional development in a new geographical context. Findings reveal the need to align development priorities of central and local governments, as well as clarifying the use of subsidies to a number of different inland ports which may potentially split economies of scale through increased competition for an overlapping hinterland. The paper demonstrates that, while in the past China’s seaports had less inland penetration compared to more mature systems, emerging trends suggest some similarities to patterns observed in more integrated networks such as Europe and North America. Inland port Logistics Freight Intermodal transport Rail Policy Planning Port authority Inland terminal Port competition Wang, Yuhong aut Enthalten in GeoJournal Springer Netherlands, 1977 78(2013), 5 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 897-913 (DE-627)13044555X (DE-600)715360-0 (DE-576)015981851 0343-2521 nnns volume:78 year:2013 number:5 day:08 month:02 pages:897-913 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2315 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4325 AR 78 2013 5 08 02 897-913 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2 doi (DE-627)OLC2113690217 (DE-He213)s10708-013-9473-2-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ 14 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Monios, Jason verfasserin aut Spatial and institutional characteristics of inland port development in China 2013 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Crown © 2013 Abstract This paper examines the spatial and institutional characteristics of the emerging trend of inland port development in China. The paper analyses a sample of 18 major inland ports in three geographical clusters, comparing observed issues with similar developments in Europe, the United States and Africa. It highlights the issues of customs clearance and intermodal transport, before an extended discussion on conflicting models of development based on the priorities of inland and port actors. The aim is first to provide a descriptive account of this development, and second to provide tentative explanations for these results by comparing the findings with similar developments in other countries. This task is aided by use of a conceptual framework drawn from the literature, in which port-driven and inland-driven inland ports are contrasted. Thus a supplementary aim of the paper is to develop the conceptual model of directional development in a new geographical context. Findings reveal the need to align development priorities of central and local governments, as well as clarifying the use of subsidies to a number of different inland ports which may potentially split economies of scale through increased competition for an overlapping hinterland. The paper demonstrates that, while in the past China’s seaports had less inland penetration compared to more mature systems, emerging trends suggest some similarities to patterns observed in more integrated networks such as Europe and North America. Inland port Logistics Freight Intermodal transport Rail Policy Planning Port authority Inland terminal Port competition Wang, Yuhong aut Enthalten in GeoJournal Springer Netherlands, 1977 78(2013), 5 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 897-913 (DE-627)13044555X (DE-600)715360-0 (DE-576)015981851 0343-2521 nnns volume:78 year:2013 number:5 day:08 month:02 pages:897-913 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2315 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4325 AR 78 2013 5 08 02 897-913 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2 doi (DE-627)OLC2113690217 (DE-He213)s10708-013-9473-2-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ 14 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Monios, Jason verfasserin aut Spatial and institutional characteristics of inland port development in China 2013 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Crown © 2013 Abstract This paper examines the spatial and institutional characteristics of the emerging trend of inland port development in China. The paper analyses a sample of 18 major inland ports in three geographical clusters, comparing observed issues with similar developments in Europe, the United States and Africa. It highlights the issues of customs clearance and intermodal transport, before an extended discussion on conflicting models of development based on the priorities of inland and port actors. The aim is first to provide a descriptive account of this development, and second to provide tentative explanations for these results by comparing the findings with similar developments in other countries. This task is aided by use of a conceptual framework drawn from the literature, in which port-driven and inland-driven inland ports are contrasted. Thus a supplementary aim of the paper is to develop the conceptual model of directional development in a new geographical context. Findings reveal the need to align development priorities of central and local governments, as well as clarifying the use of subsidies to a number of different inland ports which may potentially split economies of scale through increased competition for an overlapping hinterland. The paper demonstrates that, while in the past China’s seaports had less inland penetration compared to more mature systems, emerging trends suggest some similarities to patterns observed in more integrated networks such as Europe and North America. Inland port Logistics Freight Intermodal transport Rail Policy Planning Port authority Inland terminal Port competition Wang, Yuhong aut Enthalten in GeoJournal Springer Netherlands, 1977 78(2013), 5 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 897-913 (DE-627)13044555X (DE-600)715360-0 (DE-576)015981851 0343-2521 nnns volume:78 year:2013 number:5 day:08 month:02 pages:897-913 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2315 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4325 AR 78 2013 5 08 02 897-913 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2 doi (DE-627)OLC2113690217 (DE-He213)s10708-013-9473-2-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ 14 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Monios, Jason verfasserin aut Spatial and institutional characteristics of inland port development in China 2013 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Crown © 2013 Abstract This paper examines the spatial and institutional characteristics of the emerging trend of inland port development in China. The paper analyses a sample of 18 major inland ports in three geographical clusters, comparing observed issues with similar developments in Europe, the United States and Africa. It highlights the issues of customs clearance and intermodal transport, before an extended discussion on conflicting models of development based on the priorities of inland and port actors. The aim is first to provide a descriptive account of this development, and second to provide tentative explanations for these results by comparing the findings with similar developments in other countries. This task is aided by use of a conceptual framework drawn from the literature, in which port-driven and inland-driven inland ports are contrasted. Thus a supplementary aim of the paper is to develop the conceptual model of directional development in a new geographical context. Findings reveal the need to align development priorities of central and local governments, as well as clarifying the use of subsidies to a number of different inland ports which may potentially split economies of scale through increased competition for an overlapping hinterland. The paper demonstrates that, while in the past China’s seaports had less inland penetration compared to more mature systems, emerging trends suggest some similarities to patterns observed in more integrated networks such as Europe and North America. Inland port Logistics Freight Intermodal transport Rail Policy Planning Port authority Inland terminal Port competition Wang, Yuhong aut Enthalten in GeoJournal Springer Netherlands, 1977 78(2013), 5 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 897-913 (DE-627)13044555X (DE-600)715360-0 (DE-576)015981851 0343-2521 nnns volume:78 year:2013 number:5 day:08 month:02 pages:897-913 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2315 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4325 AR 78 2013 5 08 02 897-913 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in GeoJournal 78(2013), 5 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 897-913 volume:78 year:2013 number:5 day:08 month:02 pages:897-913 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in GeoJournal 78(2013), 5 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 897-913 volume:78 year:2013 number:5 day:08 month:02 pages:897-913 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Inland port Logistics Freight Intermodal transport Rail Policy Planning Port authority Inland terminal Port competition |
| dewey-raw |
550 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
GeoJournal |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Monios, Jason @@aut@@ Wang, Yuhong @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2013-02-08T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
13044555X |
| dewey-sort |
3550 |
| id |
OLC2113690217 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2113690217</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503063016.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230503s2013 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2113690217</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10708-013-9473-2-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">14</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Monios, Jason</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Spatial and institutional characteristics of inland port development in China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Crown © 2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This paper examines the spatial and institutional characteristics of the emerging trend of inland port development in China. The paper analyses a sample of 18 major inland ports in three geographical clusters, comparing observed issues with similar developments in Europe, the United States and Africa. It highlights the issues of customs clearance and intermodal transport, before an extended discussion on conflicting models of development based on the priorities of inland and port actors. The aim is first to provide a descriptive account of this development, and second to provide tentative explanations for these results by comparing the findings with similar developments in other countries. This task is aided by use of a conceptual framework drawn from the literature, in which port-driven and inland-driven inland ports are contrasted. Thus a supplementary aim of the paper is to develop the conceptual model of directional development in a new geographical context. Findings reveal the need to align development priorities of central and local governments, as well as clarifying the use of subsidies to a number of different inland ports which may potentially split economies of scale through increased competition for an overlapping hinterland. The paper demonstrates that, while in the past China’s seaports had less inland penetration compared to more mature systems, emerging trends suggest some similarities to patterns observed in more integrated networks such as Europe and North America.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Inland port</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Logistics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Freight</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intermodal transport</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rail</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Port authority</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Inland terminal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Port competition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Yuhong</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">GeoJournal</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1977</subfield><subfield code="g">78(2013), 5 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 897-913</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)13044555X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)715360-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015981851</subfield><subfield code="x">0343-2521</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:78</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:08</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:897-913</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2315</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4311</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">78</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">08</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">897-913</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Monios, Jason |
| spellingShingle |
Monios, Jason ddc 550 ssgn 14 fid BIODIV misc Inland port misc Logistics misc Freight misc Intermodal transport misc Rail misc Policy misc Planning misc Port authority misc Inland terminal misc Port competition Spatial and institutional characteristics of inland port development in China |
| authorStr |
Monios, Jason |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)13044555X |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
550 - Earth sciences |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0343-2521 |
| topic_title |
550 VZ 14 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Spatial and institutional characteristics of inland port development in China Inland port Logistics Freight Intermodal transport Rail Policy Planning Port authority Inland terminal Port competition |
| topic |
ddc 550 ssgn 14 fid BIODIV misc Inland port misc Logistics misc Freight misc Intermodal transport misc Rail misc Policy misc Planning misc Port authority misc Inland terminal misc Port competition |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 550 ssgn 14 fid BIODIV misc Inland port misc Logistics misc Freight misc Intermodal transport misc Rail misc Policy misc Planning misc Port authority misc Inland terminal misc Port competition |
| topic_browse |
ddc 550 ssgn 14 fid BIODIV misc Inland port misc Logistics misc Freight misc Intermodal transport misc Rail misc Policy misc Planning misc Port authority misc Inland terminal misc Port competition |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
GeoJournal |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
13044555X |
| dewey-tens |
550 - Earth sciences & geology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
GeoJournal |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)13044555X (DE-600)715360-0 (DE-576)015981851 |
| title |
Spatial and institutional characteristics of inland port development in China |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2113690217 (DE-He213)s10708-013-9473-2-p |
| title_full |
Spatial and institutional characteristics of inland port development in China |
| author_sort |
Monios, Jason |
| journal |
GeoJournal |
| journalStr |
GeoJournal |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2013 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
897 |
| author_browse |
Monios, Jason Wang, Yuhong |
| container_volume |
78 |
| class |
550 VZ 14 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Monios, Jason |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2 |
| dewey-full |
550 |
| title_sort |
spatial and institutional characteristics of inland port development in china |
| title_auth |
Spatial and institutional characteristics of inland port development in China |
| abstract |
Abstract This paper examines the spatial and institutional characteristics of the emerging trend of inland port development in China. The paper analyses a sample of 18 major inland ports in three geographical clusters, comparing observed issues with similar developments in Europe, the United States and Africa. It highlights the issues of customs clearance and intermodal transport, before an extended discussion on conflicting models of development based on the priorities of inland and port actors. The aim is first to provide a descriptive account of this development, and second to provide tentative explanations for these results by comparing the findings with similar developments in other countries. This task is aided by use of a conceptual framework drawn from the literature, in which port-driven and inland-driven inland ports are contrasted. Thus a supplementary aim of the paper is to develop the conceptual model of directional development in a new geographical context. Findings reveal the need to align development priorities of central and local governments, as well as clarifying the use of subsidies to a number of different inland ports which may potentially split economies of scale through increased competition for an overlapping hinterland. The paper demonstrates that, while in the past China’s seaports had less inland penetration compared to more mature systems, emerging trends suggest some similarities to patterns observed in more integrated networks such as Europe and North America. © Crown © 2013 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract This paper examines the spatial and institutional characteristics of the emerging trend of inland port development in China. The paper analyses a sample of 18 major inland ports in three geographical clusters, comparing observed issues with similar developments in Europe, the United States and Africa. It highlights the issues of customs clearance and intermodal transport, before an extended discussion on conflicting models of development based on the priorities of inland and port actors. The aim is first to provide a descriptive account of this development, and second to provide tentative explanations for these results by comparing the findings with similar developments in other countries. This task is aided by use of a conceptual framework drawn from the literature, in which port-driven and inland-driven inland ports are contrasted. Thus a supplementary aim of the paper is to develop the conceptual model of directional development in a new geographical context. Findings reveal the need to align development priorities of central and local governments, as well as clarifying the use of subsidies to a number of different inland ports which may potentially split economies of scale through increased competition for an overlapping hinterland. The paper demonstrates that, while in the past China’s seaports had less inland penetration compared to more mature systems, emerging trends suggest some similarities to patterns observed in more integrated networks such as Europe and North America. © Crown © 2013 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract This paper examines the spatial and institutional characteristics of the emerging trend of inland port development in China. The paper analyses a sample of 18 major inland ports in three geographical clusters, comparing observed issues with similar developments in Europe, the United States and Africa. It highlights the issues of customs clearance and intermodal transport, before an extended discussion on conflicting models of development based on the priorities of inland and port actors. The aim is first to provide a descriptive account of this development, and second to provide tentative explanations for these results by comparing the findings with similar developments in other countries. This task is aided by use of a conceptual framework drawn from the literature, in which port-driven and inland-driven inland ports are contrasted. Thus a supplementary aim of the paper is to develop the conceptual model of directional development in a new geographical context. Findings reveal the need to align development priorities of central and local governments, as well as clarifying the use of subsidies to a number of different inland ports which may potentially split economies of scale through increased competition for an overlapping hinterland. The paper demonstrates that, while in the past China’s seaports had less inland penetration compared to more mature systems, emerging trends suggest some similarities to patterns observed in more integrated networks such as Europe and North America. © Crown © 2013 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2315 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4325 |
| container_issue |
5 |
| title_short |
Spatial and institutional characteristics of inland port development in China |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Wang, Yuhong |
| author2Str |
Wang, Yuhong |
| ppnlink |
13044555X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T21:30:34.081Z |
| _version_ |
1803595005643718656 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2113690217</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503063016.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230503s2013 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2113690217</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10708-013-9473-2-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">14</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Monios, Jason</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Spatial and institutional characteristics of inland port development in China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Crown © 2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This paper examines the spatial and institutional characteristics of the emerging trend of inland port development in China. The paper analyses a sample of 18 major inland ports in three geographical clusters, comparing observed issues with similar developments in Europe, the United States and Africa. It highlights the issues of customs clearance and intermodal transport, before an extended discussion on conflicting models of development based on the priorities of inland and port actors. The aim is first to provide a descriptive account of this development, and second to provide tentative explanations for these results by comparing the findings with similar developments in other countries. This task is aided by use of a conceptual framework drawn from the literature, in which port-driven and inland-driven inland ports are contrasted. Thus a supplementary aim of the paper is to develop the conceptual model of directional development in a new geographical context. Findings reveal the need to align development priorities of central and local governments, as well as clarifying the use of subsidies to a number of different inland ports which may potentially split economies of scale through increased competition for an overlapping hinterland. The paper demonstrates that, while in the past China’s seaports had less inland penetration compared to more mature systems, emerging trends suggest some similarities to patterns observed in more integrated networks such as Europe and North America.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Inland port</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Logistics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Freight</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intermodal transport</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rail</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Port authority</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Inland terminal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Port competition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Yuhong</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">GeoJournal</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1977</subfield><subfield code="g">78(2013), 5 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 897-913</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)13044555X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)715360-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015981851</subfield><subfield code="x">0343-2521</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:78</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:08</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:897-913</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2315</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4311</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">78</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">08</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">897-913</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399168 |