Open research data, an archival challenge?
Abstract The Swedish government has decided that all research results in the form of research data and scientific publications financed with public funds should be openly accessible as far as possible. The question is whether the responsible actors and if the universities are ready to implement the...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Borgerud, Charlotte [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2020. corrected publication 2020 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Archival science - Springer Netherlands, 2001, 20(2020), 3 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 279-302 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:20 ; year:2020 ; number:3 ; day:10 ; month:02 ; pages:279-302 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2118906684 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2118906684 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230504163004.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 230504s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2118906684 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10502-020-09330-3-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 060 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 24,1 |a 8 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a 06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Borgerud, Charlotte |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0002-7510-2955 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Open research data, an archival challenge? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s) 2020. corrected publication 2020 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract The Swedish government has decided that all research results in the form of research data and scientific publications financed with public funds should be openly accessible as far as possible. The question is whether the responsible actors and if the universities are ready to implement the change. The significance of open access has amplified in Sweden. Earlier research has brought to light that the collection and preservation of research data are often surrounded by ambiguous rules and lack a comprehensive structure. For example, archiving is not given enough consideration in connection to research projects and researchers often tend to save their material on platforms that are not persistent over time. This article is based upon a qualitative research approach where 15 semi-structured interviews have been used as primarily data sources to investigate the implementation of open access of research data and scientific publications. The article investigated how Swedish universities and public authorities were working with archiving and implementation of open research data and their opinions on open access. The results displayed a lack of coordination, resources and infrastructure but also that common agreed nomenclature were missing. The management of research data was not part of an overall recordkeeping strategy. One explanation could be differences in the information culture among researchers and archivists. Social sciences theory has been combined with archival theory in order to explain the reasons to this. These have been put in relation to the principles of the open data directive. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Archival science | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Archivist | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Open data | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Open research data | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Open science | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Borglund, Erik |0 (orcid)0000-0002-2575-3653 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Archival science |d Springer Netherlands, 2001 |g 20(2020), 3 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 279-302 |w (DE-627)30292471X |w (DE-600)1492892-9 |w (DE-576)479010900 |x 1389-0166 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:20 |g year:2020 |g number:3 |g day:10 |g month:02 |g pages:279-302 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-BUB | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-BBI | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_113 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde |q VZ |0 106402633 |0 (DE-625)106402633 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 20 |j 2020 |e 3 |b 10 |c 02 |h 279-302 | ||
| author_variant |
c b cb e b eb |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:13890166:2020----::pneerhaanrhv |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| bklnumber |
06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3 doi (DE-627)OLC2118906684 (DE-He213)s10502-020-09330-3-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 060 VZ 24,1 8 ssgn 06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde bkl Borgerud, Charlotte verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-7510-2955 aut Open research data, an archival challenge? 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2020. corrected publication 2020 Abstract The Swedish government has decided that all research results in the form of research data and scientific publications financed with public funds should be openly accessible as far as possible. The question is whether the responsible actors and if the universities are ready to implement the change. The significance of open access has amplified in Sweden. Earlier research has brought to light that the collection and preservation of research data are often surrounded by ambiguous rules and lack a comprehensive structure. For example, archiving is not given enough consideration in connection to research projects and researchers often tend to save their material on platforms that are not persistent over time. This article is based upon a qualitative research approach where 15 semi-structured interviews have been used as primarily data sources to investigate the implementation of open access of research data and scientific publications. The article investigated how Swedish universities and public authorities were working with archiving and implementation of open research data and their opinions on open access. The results displayed a lack of coordination, resources and infrastructure but also that common agreed nomenclature were missing. The management of research data was not part of an overall recordkeeping strategy. One explanation could be differences in the information culture among researchers and archivists. Social sciences theory has been combined with archival theory in order to explain the reasons to this. These have been put in relation to the principles of the open data directive. Archival science Archivist Open data Open research data Open science Borglund, Erik (orcid)0000-0002-2575-3653 aut Enthalten in Archival science Springer Netherlands, 2001 20(2020), 3 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 279-302 (DE-627)30292471X (DE-600)1492892-9 (DE-576)479010900 1389-0166 nnns volume:20 year:2020 number:3 day:10 month:02 pages:279-302 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_113 GBV_ILN_4012 06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde VZ 106402633 (DE-625)106402633 AR 20 2020 3 10 02 279-302 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3 doi (DE-627)OLC2118906684 (DE-He213)s10502-020-09330-3-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 060 VZ 24,1 8 ssgn 06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde bkl Borgerud, Charlotte verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-7510-2955 aut Open research data, an archival challenge? 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2020. corrected publication 2020 Abstract The Swedish government has decided that all research results in the form of research data and scientific publications financed with public funds should be openly accessible as far as possible. The question is whether the responsible actors and if the universities are ready to implement the change. The significance of open access has amplified in Sweden. Earlier research has brought to light that the collection and preservation of research data are often surrounded by ambiguous rules and lack a comprehensive structure. For example, archiving is not given enough consideration in connection to research projects and researchers often tend to save their material on platforms that are not persistent over time. This article is based upon a qualitative research approach where 15 semi-structured interviews have been used as primarily data sources to investigate the implementation of open access of research data and scientific publications. The article investigated how Swedish universities and public authorities were working with archiving and implementation of open research data and their opinions on open access. The results displayed a lack of coordination, resources and infrastructure but also that common agreed nomenclature were missing. The management of research data was not part of an overall recordkeeping strategy. One explanation could be differences in the information culture among researchers and archivists. Social sciences theory has been combined with archival theory in order to explain the reasons to this. These have been put in relation to the principles of the open data directive. Archival science Archivist Open data Open research data Open science Borglund, Erik (orcid)0000-0002-2575-3653 aut Enthalten in Archival science Springer Netherlands, 2001 20(2020), 3 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 279-302 (DE-627)30292471X (DE-600)1492892-9 (DE-576)479010900 1389-0166 nnns volume:20 year:2020 number:3 day:10 month:02 pages:279-302 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_113 GBV_ILN_4012 06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde VZ 106402633 (DE-625)106402633 AR 20 2020 3 10 02 279-302 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3 doi (DE-627)OLC2118906684 (DE-He213)s10502-020-09330-3-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 060 VZ 24,1 8 ssgn 06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde bkl Borgerud, Charlotte verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-7510-2955 aut Open research data, an archival challenge? 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2020. corrected publication 2020 Abstract The Swedish government has decided that all research results in the form of research data and scientific publications financed with public funds should be openly accessible as far as possible. The question is whether the responsible actors and if the universities are ready to implement the change. The significance of open access has amplified in Sweden. Earlier research has brought to light that the collection and preservation of research data are often surrounded by ambiguous rules and lack a comprehensive structure. For example, archiving is not given enough consideration in connection to research projects and researchers often tend to save their material on platforms that are not persistent over time. This article is based upon a qualitative research approach where 15 semi-structured interviews have been used as primarily data sources to investigate the implementation of open access of research data and scientific publications. The article investigated how Swedish universities and public authorities were working with archiving and implementation of open research data and their opinions on open access. The results displayed a lack of coordination, resources and infrastructure but also that common agreed nomenclature were missing. The management of research data was not part of an overall recordkeeping strategy. One explanation could be differences in the information culture among researchers and archivists. Social sciences theory has been combined with archival theory in order to explain the reasons to this. These have been put in relation to the principles of the open data directive. Archival science Archivist Open data Open research data Open science Borglund, Erik (orcid)0000-0002-2575-3653 aut Enthalten in Archival science Springer Netherlands, 2001 20(2020), 3 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 279-302 (DE-627)30292471X (DE-600)1492892-9 (DE-576)479010900 1389-0166 nnns volume:20 year:2020 number:3 day:10 month:02 pages:279-302 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_113 GBV_ILN_4012 06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde VZ 106402633 (DE-625)106402633 AR 20 2020 3 10 02 279-302 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3 doi (DE-627)OLC2118906684 (DE-He213)s10502-020-09330-3-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 060 VZ 24,1 8 ssgn 06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde bkl Borgerud, Charlotte verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-7510-2955 aut Open research data, an archival challenge? 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2020. corrected publication 2020 Abstract The Swedish government has decided that all research results in the form of research data and scientific publications financed with public funds should be openly accessible as far as possible. The question is whether the responsible actors and if the universities are ready to implement the change. The significance of open access has amplified in Sweden. Earlier research has brought to light that the collection and preservation of research data are often surrounded by ambiguous rules and lack a comprehensive structure. For example, archiving is not given enough consideration in connection to research projects and researchers often tend to save their material on platforms that are not persistent over time. This article is based upon a qualitative research approach where 15 semi-structured interviews have been used as primarily data sources to investigate the implementation of open access of research data and scientific publications. The article investigated how Swedish universities and public authorities were working with archiving and implementation of open research data and their opinions on open access. The results displayed a lack of coordination, resources and infrastructure but also that common agreed nomenclature were missing. The management of research data was not part of an overall recordkeeping strategy. One explanation could be differences in the information culture among researchers and archivists. Social sciences theory has been combined with archival theory in order to explain the reasons to this. These have been put in relation to the principles of the open data directive. Archival science Archivist Open data Open research data Open science Borglund, Erik (orcid)0000-0002-2575-3653 aut Enthalten in Archival science Springer Netherlands, 2001 20(2020), 3 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 279-302 (DE-627)30292471X (DE-600)1492892-9 (DE-576)479010900 1389-0166 nnns volume:20 year:2020 number:3 day:10 month:02 pages:279-302 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_113 GBV_ILN_4012 06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde VZ 106402633 (DE-625)106402633 AR 20 2020 3 10 02 279-302 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3 doi (DE-627)OLC2118906684 (DE-He213)s10502-020-09330-3-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 060 VZ 24,1 8 ssgn 06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde bkl Borgerud, Charlotte verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-7510-2955 aut Open research data, an archival challenge? 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2020. corrected publication 2020 Abstract The Swedish government has decided that all research results in the form of research data and scientific publications financed with public funds should be openly accessible as far as possible. The question is whether the responsible actors and if the universities are ready to implement the change. The significance of open access has amplified in Sweden. Earlier research has brought to light that the collection and preservation of research data are often surrounded by ambiguous rules and lack a comprehensive structure. For example, archiving is not given enough consideration in connection to research projects and researchers often tend to save their material on platforms that are not persistent over time. This article is based upon a qualitative research approach where 15 semi-structured interviews have been used as primarily data sources to investigate the implementation of open access of research data and scientific publications. The article investigated how Swedish universities and public authorities were working with archiving and implementation of open research data and their opinions on open access. The results displayed a lack of coordination, resources and infrastructure but also that common agreed nomenclature were missing. The management of research data was not part of an overall recordkeeping strategy. One explanation could be differences in the information culture among researchers and archivists. Social sciences theory has been combined with archival theory in order to explain the reasons to this. These have been put in relation to the principles of the open data directive. Archival science Archivist Open data Open research data Open science Borglund, Erik (orcid)0000-0002-2575-3653 aut Enthalten in Archival science Springer Netherlands, 2001 20(2020), 3 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 279-302 (DE-627)30292471X (DE-600)1492892-9 (DE-576)479010900 1389-0166 nnns volume:20 year:2020 number:3 day:10 month:02 pages:279-302 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_113 GBV_ILN_4012 06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde VZ 106402633 (DE-625)106402633 AR 20 2020 3 10 02 279-302 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Archival science 20(2020), 3 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 279-302 volume:20 year:2020 number:3 day:10 month:02 pages:279-302 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Archival science 20(2020), 3 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 279-302 volume:20 year:2020 number:3 day:10 month:02 pages:279-302 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Archival science Archivist Open data Open research data Open science |
| dewey-raw |
060 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Archival science |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Borgerud, Charlotte @@aut@@ Borglund, Erik @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-02-10T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
30292471X |
| dewey-sort |
260 |
| id |
OLC2118906684 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2118906684</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504163004.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230504s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2118906684</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10502-020-09330-3-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">060</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">24,1</subfield><subfield code="a">8</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Borgerud, Charlotte</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-7510-2955</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Open research data, an archival challenge?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2020. corrected publication 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The Swedish government has decided that all research results in the form of research data and scientific publications financed with public funds should be openly accessible as far as possible. The question is whether the responsible actors and if the universities are ready to implement the change. The significance of open access has amplified in Sweden. Earlier research has brought to light that the collection and preservation of research data are often surrounded by ambiguous rules and lack a comprehensive structure. For example, archiving is not given enough consideration in connection to research projects and researchers often tend to save their material on platforms that are not persistent over time. This article is based upon a qualitative research approach where 15 semi-structured interviews have been used as primarily data sources to investigate the implementation of open access of research data and scientific publications. The article investigated how Swedish universities and public authorities were working with archiving and implementation of open research data and their opinions on open access. The results displayed a lack of coordination, resources and infrastructure but also that common agreed nomenclature were missing. The management of research data was not part of an overall recordkeeping strategy. One explanation could be differences in the information culture among researchers and archivists. Social sciences theory has been combined with archival theory in order to explain the reasons to this. These have been put in relation to the principles of the open data directive.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Archival science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Archivist</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Open data</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Open research data</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Open science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Borglund, Erik</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-2575-3653</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Archival science</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">20(2020), 3 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 279-302</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)30292471X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1492892-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)479010900</subfield><subfield code="x">1389-0166</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:20</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:10</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:279-302</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-BUB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-BBI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="0">106402633</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)106402633</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">20</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">10</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">279-302</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Borgerud, Charlotte |
| spellingShingle |
Borgerud, Charlotte ddc 060 ssgn 24,1 bkl 06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde misc Archival science misc Archivist misc Open data misc Open research data misc Open science Open research data, an archival challenge? |
| authorStr |
Borgerud, Charlotte |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)30292471X |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
060 - General organizations & museum science |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1389-0166 |
| topic_title |
060 VZ 24,1 8 ssgn 06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde bkl Open research data, an archival challenge? Archival science Archivist Open data Open research data Open science |
| topic |
ddc 060 ssgn 24,1 bkl 06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde misc Archival science misc Archivist misc Open data misc Open research data misc Open science |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 060 ssgn 24,1 bkl 06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde misc Archival science misc Archivist misc Open data misc Open research data misc Open science |
| topic_browse |
ddc 060 ssgn 24,1 bkl 06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde misc Archival science misc Archivist misc Open data misc Open research data misc Open science |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Archival science |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
30292471X |
| dewey-tens |
060 - Associations, organizations & museums |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Archival science |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)30292471X (DE-600)1492892-9 (DE-576)479010900 |
| title |
Open research data, an archival challenge? |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2118906684 (DE-He213)s10502-020-09330-3-p |
| title_full |
Open research data, an archival challenge? |
| author_sort |
Borgerud, Charlotte |
| journal |
Archival science |
| journalStr |
Archival science |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
000 - Computer science, information & general works |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
279 |
| author_browse |
Borgerud, Charlotte Borglund, Erik |
| container_volume |
20 |
| class |
060 VZ 24,1 8 ssgn 06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Borgerud, Charlotte |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3 |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0002-7510-2955 (ORCID)0000-0002-2575-3653 106402633 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0002-7510-2955 (orcid)0000-0002-2575-3653 106402633 (DE-625)106402633 |
| dewey-full |
060 |
| title_sort |
open research data, an archival challenge? |
| title_auth |
Open research data, an archival challenge? |
| abstract |
Abstract The Swedish government has decided that all research results in the form of research data and scientific publications financed with public funds should be openly accessible as far as possible. The question is whether the responsible actors and if the universities are ready to implement the change. The significance of open access has amplified in Sweden. Earlier research has brought to light that the collection and preservation of research data are often surrounded by ambiguous rules and lack a comprehensive structure. For example, archiving is not given enough consideration in connection to research projects and researchers often tend to save their material on platforms that are not persistent over time. This article is based upon a qualitative research approach where 15 semi-structured interviews have been used as primarily data sources to investigate the implementation of open access of research data and scientific publications. The article investigated how Swedish universities and public authorities were working with archiving and implementation of open research data and their opinions on open access. The results displayed a lack of coordination, resources and infrastructure but also that common agreed nomenclature were missing. The management of research data was not part of an overall recordkeeping strategy. One explanation could be differences in the information culture among researchers and archivists. Social sciences theory has been combined with archival theory in order to explain the reasons to this. These have been put in relation to the principles of the open data directive. © The Author(s) 2020. corrected publication 2020 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract The Swedish government has decided that all research results in the form of research data and scientific publications financed with public funds should be openly accessible as far as possible. The question is whether the responsible actors and if the universities are ready to implement the change. The significance of open access has amplified in Sweden. Earlier research has brought to light that the collection and preservation of research data are often surrounded by ambiguous rules and lack a comprehensive structure. For example, archiving is not given enough consideration in connection to research projects and researchers often tend to save their material on platforms that are not persistent over time. This article is based upon a qualitative research approach where 15 semi-structured interviews have been used as primarily data sources to investigate the implementation of open access of research data and scientific publications. The article investigated how Swedish universities and public authorities were working with archiving and implementation of open research data and their opinions on open access. The results displayed a lack of coordination, resources and infrastructure but also that common agreed nomenclature were missing. The management of research data was not part of an overall recordkeeping strategy. One explanation could be differences in the information culture among researchers and archivists. Social sciences theory has been combined with archival theory in order to explain the reasons to this. These have been put in relation to the principles of the open data directive. © The Author(s) 2020. corrected publication 2020 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract The Swedish government has decided that all research results in the form of research data and scientific publications financed with public funds should be openly accessible as far as possible. The question is whether the responsible actors and if the universities are ready to implement the change. The significance of open access has amplified in Sweden. Earlier research has brought to light that the collection and preservation of research data are often surrounded by ambiguous rules and lack a comprehensive structure. For example, archiving is not given enough consideration in connection to research projects and researchers often tend to save their material on platforms that are not persistent over time. This article is based upon a qualitative research approach where 15 semi-structured interviews have been used as primarily data sources to investigate the implementation of open access of research data and scientific publications. The article investigated how Swedish universities and public authorities were working with archiving and implementation of open research data and their opinions on open access. The results displayed a lack of coordination, resources and infrastructure but also that common agreed nomenclature were missing. The management of research data was not part of an overall recordkeeping strategy. One explanation could be differences in the information culture among researchers and archivists. Social sciences theory has been combined with archival theory in order to explain the reasons to this. These have been put in relation to the principles of the open data directive. © The Author(s) 2020. corrected publication 2020 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_113 GBV_ILN_4012 |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Open research data, an archival challenge? |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Borglund, Erik |
| author2Str |
Borglund, Erik |
| ppnlink |
30292471X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T22:11:31.916Z |
| _version_ |
1803597582873657344 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2118906684</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504163004.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230504s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2118906684</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10502-020-09330-3-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">060</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">24,1</subfield><subfield code="a">8</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Borgerud, Charlotte</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-7510-2955</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Open research data, an archival challenge?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2020. corrected publication 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The Swedish government has decided that all research results in the form of research data and scientific publications financed with public funds should be openly accessible as far as possible. The question is whether the responsible actors and if the universities are ready to implement the change. The significance of open access has amplified in Sweden. Earlier research has brought to light that the collection and preservation of research data are often surrounded by ambiguous rules and lack a comprehensive structure. For example, archiving is not given enough consideration in connection to research projects and researchers often tend to save their material on platforms that are not persistent over time. This article is based upon a qualitative research approach where 15 semi-structured interviews have been used as primarily data sources to investigate the implementation of open access of research data and scientific publications. The article investigated how Swedish universities and public authorities were working with archiving and implementation of open research data and their opinions on open access. The results displayed a lack of coordination, resources and infrastructure but also that common agreed nomenclature were missing. The management of research data was not part of an overall recordkeeping strategy. One explanation could be differences in the information culture among researchers and archivists. Social sciences theory has been combined with archival theory in order to explain the reasons to this. These have been put in relation to the principles of the open data directive.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Archival science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Archivist</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Open data</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Open research data</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Open science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Borglund, Erik</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-2575-3653</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Archival science</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">20(2020), 3 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 279-302</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)30292471X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1492892-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)479010900</subfield><subfield code="x">1389-0166</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:20</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:10</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:279-302</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-BUB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-BBI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">06.90$jArchive$jArchivkunde</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="0">106402633</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)106402633</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">20</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">10</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">279-302</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.402815 |