Cheating in university exams: the relevance of social factors
Abstract We implemented an online anonymous survey targeted to current and former students, where the interviewed indicate whether and to what extent they cheated during written university examinations. We find that 61% of respondents have cheated once or more. Cheaters are more likely to report tha...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Bucciol, Alessandro [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: International review of economics - Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007, 67(2020), 3 vom: 02. Jan., Seite 319-338 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:67 ; year:2020 ; number:3 ; day:02 ; month:01 ; pages:319-338 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC211900398X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC211900398X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230504163619.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 230504s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC211900398X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s12232-019-00343-8-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 330 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 330 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Bucciol, Alessandro |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0001-8163-7617 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Cheating in university exams: the relevance of social factors |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract We implemented an online anonymous survey targeted to current and former students, where the interviewed indicate whether and to what extent they cheated during written university examinations. We find that 61% of respondents have cheated once or more. Cheaters are more likely to report that their classmates and friends cheated and that in general people can be trusted. Two different cheating styles emerge: ‘social cheaters,’ who self-report that they have violated the rules interacting with others; ‘individualistic’ cheaters, who self-report that they have used prohibited materials. Only social cheaters exhibit higher levels of trust compared to individualistic cheaters. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Academic dishonesty | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Honesty | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Trust | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Online survey | |
| 650 | 4 | |a College students | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cicognani, Simona |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Montinari, Natalia |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International review of economics |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007 |g 67(2020), 3 vom: 02. Jan., Seite 319-338 |w (DE-627)54610715X |w (DE-600)2390807-5 |w (DE-576)286023334 |x 1865-1704 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:67 |g year:2020 |g number:3 |g day:02 |g month:01 |g pages:319-338 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-IBL | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_267 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2018 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 67 |j 2020 |e 3 |b 02 |c 01 |h 319-338 | ||
| author_variant |
a b ab s c sc n m nm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:18651704:2020----::haignnvriyxmteeeaco |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8 doi (DE-627)OLC211900398X (DE-He213)s12232-019-00343-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ 330 VZ Bucciol, Alessandro verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-8163-7617 aut Cheating in university exams: the relevance of social factors 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020 Abstract We implemented an online anonymous survey targeted to current and former students, where the interviewed indicate whether and to what extent they cheated during written university examinations. We find that 61% of respondents have cheated once or more. Cheaters are more likely to report that their classmates and friends cheated and that in general people can be trusted. Two different cheating styles emerge: ‘social cheaters,’ who self-report that they have violated the rules interacting with others; ‘individualistic’ cheaters, who self-report that they have used prohibited materials. Only social cheaters exhibit higher levels of trust compared to individualistic cheaters. Academic dishonesty Honesty Trust Online survey College students Cicognani, Simona aut Montinari, Natalia aut Enthalten in International review of economics Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007 67(2020), 3 vom: 02. Jan., Seite 319-338 (DE-627)54610715X (DE-600)2390807-5 (DE-576)286023334 1865-1704 nnns volume:67 year:2020 number:3 day:02 month:01 pages:319-338 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2018 AR 67 2020 3 02 01 319-338 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8 doi (DE-627)OLC211900398X (DE-He213)s12232-019-00343-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ 330 VZ Bucciol, Alessandro verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-8163-7617 aut Cheating in university exams: the relevance of social factors 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020 Abstract We implemented an online anonymous survey targeted to current and former students, where the interviewed indicate whether and to what extent they cheated during written university examinations. We find that 61% of respondents have cheated once or more. Cheaters are more likely to report that their classmates and friends cheated and that in general people can be trusted. Two different cheating styles emerge: ‘social cheaters,’ who self-report that they have violated the rules interacting with others; ‘individualistic’ cheaters, who self-report that they have used prohibited materials. Only social cheaters exhibit higher levels of trust compared to individualistic cheaters. Academic dishonesty Honesty Trust Online survey College students Cicognani, Simona aut Montinari, Natalia aut Enthalten in International review of economics Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007 67(2020), 3 vom: 02. Jan., Seite 319-338 (DE-627)54610715X (DE-600)2390807-5 (DE-576)286023334 1865-1704 nnns volume:67 year:2020 number:3 day:02 month:01 pages:319-338 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2018 AR 67 2020 3 02 01 319-338 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8 doi (DE-627)OLC211900398X (DE-He213)s12232-019-00343-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ 330 VZ Bucciol, Alessandro verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-8163-7617 aut Cheating in university exams: the relevance of social factors 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020 Abstract We implemented an online anonymous survey targeted to current and former students, where the interviewed indicate whether and to what extent they cheated during written university examinations. We find that 61% of respondents have cheated once or more. Cheaters are more likely to report that their classmates and friends cheated and that in general people can be trusted. Two different cheating styles emerge: ‘social cheaters,’ who self-report that they have violated the rules interacting with others; ‘individualistic’ cheaters, who self-report that they have used prohibited materials. Only social cheaters exhibit higher levels of trust compared to individualistic cheaters. Academic dishonesty Honesty Trust Online survey College students Cicognani, Simona aut Montinari, Natalia aut Enthalten in International review of economics Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007 67(2020), 3 vom: 02. Jan., Seite 319-338 (DE-627)54610715X (DE-600)2390807-5 (DE-576)286023334 1865-1704 nnns volume:67 year:2020 number:3 day:02 month:01 pages:319-338 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2018 AR 67 2020 3 02 01 319-338 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8 doi (DE-627)OLC211900398X (DE-He213)s12232-019-00343-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ 330 VZ Bucciol, Alessandro verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-8163-7617 aut Cheating in university exams: the relevance of social factors 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020 Abstract We implemented an online anonymous survey targeted to current and former students, where the interviewed indicate whether and to what extent they cheated during written university examinations. We find that 61% of respondents have cheated once or more. Cheaters are more likely to report that their classmates and friends cheated and that in general people can be trusted. Two different cheating styles emerge: ‘social cheaters,’ who self-report that they have violated the rules interacting with others; ‘individualistic’ cheaters, who self-report that they have used prohibited materials. Only social cheaters exhibit higher levels of trust compared to individualistic cheaters. Academic dishonesty Honesty Trust Online survey College students Cicognani, Simona aut Montinari, Natalia aut Enthalten in International review of economics Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007 67(2020), 3 vom: 02. Jan., Seite 319-338 (DE-627)54610715X (DE-600)2390807-5 (DE-576)286023334 1865-1704 nnns volume:67 year:2020 number:3 day:02 month:01 pages:319-338 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2018 AR 67 2020 3 02 01 319-338 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8 doi (DE-627)OLC211900398X (DE-He213)s12232-019-00343-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ 330 VZ Bucciol, Alessandro verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-8163-7617 aut Cheating in university exams: the relevance of social factors 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020 Abstract We implemented an online anonymous survey targeted to current and former students, where the interviewed indicate whether and to what extent they cheated during written university examinations. We find that 61% of respondents have cheated once or more. Cheaters are more likely to report that their classmates and friends cheated and that in general people can be trusted. Two different cheating styles emerge: ‘social cheaters,’ who self-report that they have violated the rules interacting with others; ‘individualistic’ cheaters, who self-report that they have used prohibited materials. Only social cheaters exhibit higher levels of trust compared to individualistic cheaters. Academic dishonesty Honesty Trust Online survey College students Cicognani, Simona aut Montinari, Natalia aut Enthalten in International review of economics Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007 67(2020), 3 vom: 02. Jan., Seite 319-338 (DE-627)54610715X (DE-600)2390807-5 (DE-576)286023334 1865-1704 nnns volume:67 year:2020 number:3 day:02 month:01 pages:319-338 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2018 AR 67 2020 3 02 01 319-338 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in International review of economics 67(2020), 3 vom: 02. Jan., Seite 319-338 volume:67 year:2020 number:3 day:02 month:01 pages:319-338 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in International review of economics 67(2020), 3 vom: 02. Jan., Seite 319-338 volume:67 year:2020 number:3 day:02 month:01 pages:319-338 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Academic dishonesty Honesty Trust Online survey College students |
| dewey-raw |
330 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
International review of economics |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Bucciol, Alessandro @@aut@@ Cicognani, Simona @@aut@@ Montinari, Natalia @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-02T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
54610715X |
| dewey-sort |
3330 |
| id |
OLC211900398X |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC211900398X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504163619.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230504s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC211900398X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s12232-019-00343-8-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bucciol, Alessandro</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-8163-7617</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cheating in university exams: the relevance of social factors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract We implemented an online anonymous survey targeted to current and former students, where the interviewed indicate whether and to what extent they cheated during written university examinations. We find that 61% of respondents have cheated once or more. Cheaters are more likely to report that their classmates and friends cheated and that in general people can be trusted. Two different cheating styles emerge: ‘social cheaters,’ who self-report that they have violated the rules interacting with others; ‘individualistic’ cheaters, who self-report that they have used prohibited materials. Only social cheaters exhibit higher levels of trust compared to individualistic cheaters.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Academic dishonesty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Honesty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trust</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Online survey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">College students</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cicognani, Simona</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Montinari, Natalia</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International review of economics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007</subfield><subfield code="g">67(2020), 3 vom: 02. Jan., Seite 319-338</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)54610715X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2390807-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)286023334</subfield><subfield code="x">1865-1704</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:67</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:319-338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">67</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">319-338</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Bucciol, Alessandro |
| spellingShingle |
Bucciol, Alessandro ddc 330 misc Academic dishonesty misc Honesty misc Trust misc Online survey misc College students Cheating in university exams: the relevance of social factors |
| authorStr |
Bucciol, Alessandro |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)54610715X |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
330 - Economics |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1865-1704 |
| topic_title |
330 VZ Cheating in university exams: the relevance of social factors Academic dishonesty Honesty Trust Online survey College students |
| topic |
ddc 330 misc Academic dishonesty misc Honesty misc Trust misc Online survey misc College students |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 330 misc Academic dishonesty misc Honesty misc Trust misc Online survey misc College students |
| topic_browse |
ddc 330 misc Academic dishonesty misc Honesty misc Trust misc Online survey misc College students |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
International review of economics |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
54610715X |
| dewey-tens |
330 - Economics |
| hierarchy_top_title |
International review of economics |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)54610715X (DE-600)2390807-5 (DE-576)286023334 |
| title |
Cheating in university exams: the relevance of social factors |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC211900398X (DE-He213)s12232-019-00343-8-p |
| title_full |
Cheating in university exams: the relevance of social factors |
| author_sort |
Bucciol, Alessandro |
| journal |
International review of economics |
| journalStr |
International review of economics |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
319 |
| author_browse |
Bucciol, Alessandro Cicognani, Simona Montinari, Natalia |
| container_volume |
67 |
| class |
330 VZ |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Bucciol, Alessandro |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8 |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0001-8163-7617 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0001-8163-7617 |
| dewey-full |
330 |
| title_sort |
cheating in university exams: the relevance of social factors |
| title_auth |
Cheating in university exams: the relevance of social factors |
| abstract |
Abstract We implemented an online anonymous survey targeted to current and former students, where the interviewed indicate whether and to what extent they cheated during written university examinations. We find that 61% of respondents have cheated once or more. Cheaters are more likely to report that their classmates and friends cheated and that in general people can be trusted. Two different cheating styles emerge: ‘social cheaters,’ who self-report that they have violated the rules interacting with others; ‘individualistic’ cheaters, who self-report that they have used prohibited materials. Only social cheaters exhibit higher levels of trust compared to individualistic cheaters. © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract We implemented an online anonymous survey targeted to current and former students, where the interviewed indicate whether and to what extent they cheated during written university examinations. We find that 61% of respondents have cheated once or more. Cheaters are more likely to report that their classmates and friends cheated and that in general people can be trusted. Two different cheating styles emerge: ‘social cheaters,’ who self-report that they have violated the rules interacting with others; ‘individualistic’ cheaters, who self-report that they have used prohibited materials. Only social cheaters exhibit higher levels of trust compared to individualistic cheaters. © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract We implemented an online anonymous survey targeted to current and former students, where the interviewed indicate whether and to what extent they cheated during written university examinations. We find that 61% of respondents have cheated once or more. Cheaters are more likely to report that their classmates and friends cheated and that in general people can be trusted. Two different cheating styles emerge: ‘social cheaters,’ who self-report that they have violated the rules interacting with others; ‘individualistic’ cheaters, who self-report that they have used prohibited materials. Only social cheaters exhibit higher levels of trust compared to individualistic cheaters. © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2018 |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Cheating in university exams: the relevance of social factors |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Cicognani, Simona Montinari, Natalia |
| author2Str |
Cicognani, Simona Montinari, Natalia |
| ppnlink |
54610715X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T22:45:26.039Z |
| _version_ |
1803599715804119041 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC211900398X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504163619.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230504s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC211900398X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s12232-019-00343-8-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bucciol, Alessandro</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-8163-7617</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cheating in university exams: the relevance of social factors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract We implemented an online anonymous survey targeted to current and former students, where the interviewed indicate whether and to what extent they cheated during written university examinations. We find that 61% of respondents have cheated once or more. Cheaters are more likely to report that their classmates and friends cheated and that in general people can be trusted. Two different cheating styles emerge: ‘social cheaters,’ who self-report that they have violated the rules interacting with others; ‘individualistic’ cheaters, who self-report that they have used prohibited materials. Only social cheaters exhibit higher levels of trust compared to individualistic cheaters.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Academic dishonesty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Honesty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trust</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Online survey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">College students</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cicognani, Simona</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Montinari, Natalia</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International review of economics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007</subfield><subfield code="g">67(2020), 3 vom: 02. Jan., Seite 319-338</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)54610715X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2390807-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)286023334</subfield><subfield code="x">1865-1704</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:67</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:319-338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">67</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">319-338</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399868 |