Improving social book search using structure semantics, bibliographic descriptions and social metadata
Abstract Social Book Search is an Information Retrieval (IR) approach that studies the impact of the Social Web on book retrieval. To understand this impact, it is necessary to develop a stronger classical baseline run by considering the contribution of query formulation, document representation, an...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Ullah, Irfan [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Multimedia tools and applications - Springer US, 1995, 80(2020), 4 vom: 03. Okt., Seite 5131-5172 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:80 ; year:2020 ; number:4 ; day:03 ; month:10 ; pages:5131-5172 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11042-020-09811-8 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2123206644 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2123206644 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230505071921.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 230505s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11042-020-09811-8 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2123206644 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s11042-020-09811-8-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 070 |a 004 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Ullah, Irfan |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0003-0693-5467 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Improving social book search using structure semantics, bibliographic descriptions and social metadata |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Social Book Search is an Information Retrieval (IR) approach that studies the impact of the Social Web on book retrieval. To understand this impact, it is necessary to develop a stronger classical baseline run by considering the contribution of query formulation, document representation, and retrieval model. Such a stronger baseline run can be re-ranked using metadata features from the Social Web to see if it improves the relevance of book search results over the classical IR approaches. However, existing studies neither considered collectively the contribution of the three mentioned factors in the baseline retrieval nor devised a re-ranking formula to exploit the collective impact of the metadata features in re-ranking. To fill these gaps in the literature, this research work first performs baseline retrieval by considering all three factors. For query formulation, it uses topic sets obtained from the discussion threads of LibraryThing. For book representation in indexing, it uses metadata from social websites including Amazon and LibraryThing. For the role of the retrieval model, it experiments with traditional, probabilistic, and fielded models. Second, it devises a re-ranking solution that exploits ratings, tags, reviews, and votes in reordering the baseline search results. Our best-performing retrieval methods outperform existing approaches on several topic sets and relevance judgments. The findings suggest that using all topic fields formulates the best search queries. The user-generated content gives better book representation if made part of the search index. Re-ranking the classical/baseline results improves relevance. The findings have implications for information science, IR, and Interactive IR. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Information retrieval | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Information science | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social web | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social book search | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ranking, re-ranking | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Khusro, Shah |0 (orcid)0000-0002-7734-7243 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ahmad, Ibrar |0 (orcid)0000-0001-6206-3160 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Multimedia tools and applications |d Springer US, 1995 |g 80(2020), 4 vom: 03. Okt., Seite 5131-5172 |w (DE-627)189064145 |w (DE-600)1287642-2 |w (DE-576)052842126 |x 1380-7501 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:80 |g year:2020 |g number:4 |g day:03 |g month:10 |g pages:5131-5172 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09811-8 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-MAT | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-BUB | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-MKW | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 80 |j 2020 |e 4 |b 03 |c 10 |h 5131-5172 | ||
| author_variant |
i u iu s k sk i a ia |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:13807501:2020----::mrvnscabosacuigtutrsmnisilorpidsr |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s11042-020-09811-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2123206644 (DE-He213)s11042-020-09811-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 070 004 VZ Ullah, Irfan verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-0693-5467 aut Improving social book search using structure semantics, bibliographic descriptions and social metadata 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 Abstract Social Book Search is an Information Retrieval (IR) approach that studies the impact of the Social Web on book retrieval. To understand this impact, it is necessary to develop a stronger classical baseline run by considering the contribution of query formulation, document representation, and retrieval model. Such a stronger baseline run can be re-ranked using metadata features from the Social Web to see if it improves the relevance of book search results over the classical IR approaches. However, existing studies neither considered collectively the contribution of the three mentioned factors in the baseline retrieval nor devised a re-ranking formula to exploit the collective impact of the metadata features in re-ranking. To fill these gaps in the literature, this research work first performs baseline retrieval by considering all three factors. For query formulation, it uses topic sets obtained from the discussion threads of LibraryThing. For book representation in indexing, it uses metadata from social websites including Amazon and LibraryThing. For the role of the retrieval model, it experiments with traditional, probabilistic, and fielded models. Second, it devises a re-ranking solution that exploits ratings, tags, reviews, and votes in reordering the baseline search results. Our best-performing retrieval methods outperform existing approaches on several topic sets and relevance judgments. The findings suggest that using all topic fields formulates the best search queries. The user-generated content gives better book representation if made part of the search index. Re-ranking the classical/baseline results improves relevance. The findings have implications for information science, IR, and Interactive IR. Information retrieval Information science Social web Social book search Ranking, re-ranking Khusro, Shah (orcid)0000-0002-7734-7243 aut Ahmad, Ibrar (orcid)0000-0001-6206-3160 aut Enthalten in Multimedia tools and applications Springer US, 1995 80(2020), 4 vom: 03. Okt., Seite 5131-5172 (DE-627)189064145 (DE-600)1287642-2 (DE-576)052842126 1380-7501 nnns volume:80 year:2020 number:4 day:03 month:10 pages:5131-5172 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09811-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OLC-MKW AR 80 2020 4 03 10 5131-5172 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s11042-020-09811-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2123206644 (DE-He213)s11042-020-09811-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 070 004 VZ Ullah, Irfan verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-0693-5467 aut Improving social book search using structure semantics, bibliographic descriptions and social metadata 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 Abstract Social Book Search is an Information Retrieval (IR) approach that studies the impact of the Social Web on book retrieval. To understand this impact, it is necessary to develop a stronger classical baseline run by considering the contribution of query formulation, document representation, and retrieval model. Such a stronger baseline run can be re-ranked using metadata features from the Social Web to see if it improves the relevance of book search results over the classical IR approaches. However, existing studies neither considered collectively the contribution of the three mentioned factors in the baseline retrieval nor devised a re-ranking formula to exploit the collective impact of the metadata features in re-ranking. To fill these gaps in the literature, this research work first performs baseline retrieval by considering all three factors. For query formulation, it uses topic sets obtained from the discussion threads of LibraryThing. For book representation in indexing, it uses metadata from social websites including Amazon and LibraryThing. For the role of the retrieval model, it experiments with traditional, probabilistic, and fielded models. Second, it devises a re-ranking solution that exploits ratings, tags, reviews, and votes in reordering the baseline search results. Our best-performing retrieval methods outperform existing approaches on several topic sets and relevance judgments. The findings suggest that using all topic fields formulates the best search queries. The user-generated content gives better book representation if made part of the search index. Re-ranking the classical/baseline results improves relevance. The findings have implications for information science, IR, and Interactive IR. Information retrieval Information science Social web Social book search Ranking, re-ranking Khusro, Shah (orcid)0000-0002-7734-7243 aut Ahmad, Ibrar (orcid)0000-0001-6206-3160 aut Enthalten in Multimedia tools and applications Springer US, 1995 80(2020), 4 vom: 03. Okt., Seite 5131-5172 (DE-627)189064145 (DE-600)1287642-2 (DE-576)052842126 1380-7501 nnns volume:80 year:2020 number:4 day:03 month:10 pages:5131-5172 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09811-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OLC-MKW AR 80 2020 4 03 10 5131-5172 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11042-020-09811-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2123206644 (DE-He213)s11042-020-09811-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 070 004 VZ Ullah, Irfan verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-0693-5467 aut Improving social book search using structure semantics, bibliographic descriptions and social metadata 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 Abstract Social Book Search is an Information Retrieval (IR) approach that studies the impact of the Social Web on book retrieval. To understand this impact, it is necessary to develop a stronger classical baseline run by considering the contribution of query formulation, document representation, and retrieval model. Such a stronger baseline run can be re-ranked using metadata features from the Social Web to see if it improves the relevance of book search results over the classical IR approaches. However, existing studies neither considered collectively the contribution of the three mentioned factors in the baseline retrieval nor devised a re-ranking formula to exploit the collective impact of the metadata features in re-ranking. To fill these gaps in the literature, this research work first performs baseline retrieval by considering all three factors. For query formulation, it uses topic sets obtained from the discussion threads of LibraryThing. For book representation in indexing, it uses metadata from social websites including Amazon and LibraryThing. For the role of the retrieval model, it experiments with traditional, probabilistic, and fielded models. Second, it devises a re-ranking solution that exploits ratings, tags, reviews, and votes in reordering the baseline search results. Our best-performing retrieval methods outperform existing approaches on several topic sets and relevance judgments. The findings suggest that using all topic fields formulates the best search queries. The user-generated content gives better book representation if made part of the search index. Re-ranking the classical/baseline results improves relevance. The findings have implications for information science, IR, and Interactive IR. Information retrieval Information science Social web Social book search Ranking, re-ranking Khusro, Shah (orcid)0000-0002-7734-7243 aut Ahmad, Ibrar (orcid)0000-0001-6206-3160 aut Enthalten in Multimedia tools and applications Springer US, 1995 80(2020), 4 vom: 03. Okt., Seite 5131-5172 (DE-627)189064145 (DE-600)1287642-2 (DE-576)052842126 1380-7501 nnns volume:80 year:2020 number:4 day:03 month:10 pages:5131-5172 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09811-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OLC-MKW AR 80 2020 4 03 10 5131-5172 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11042-020-09811-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2123206644 (DE-He213)s11042-020-09811-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 070 004 VZ Ullah, Irfan verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-0693-5467 aut Improving social book search using structure semantics, bibliographic descriptions and social metadata 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 Abstract Social Book Search is an Information Retrieval (IR) approach that studies the impact of the Social Web on book retrieval. To understand this impact, it is necessary to develop a stronger classical baseline run by considering the contribution of query formulation, document representation, and retrieval model. Such a stronger baseline run can be re-ranked using metadata features from the Social Web to see if it improves the relevance of book search results over the classical IR approaches. However, existing studies neither considered collectively the contribution of the three mentioned factors in the baseline retrieval nor devised a re-ranking formula to exploit the collective impact of the metadata features in re-ranking. To fill these gaps in the literature, this research work first performs baseline retrieval by considering all three factors. For query formulation, it uses topic sets obtained from the discussion threads of LibraryThing. For book representation in indexing, it uses metadata from social websites including Amazon and LibraryThing. For the role of the retrieval model, it experiments with traditional, probabilistic, and fielded models. Second, it devises a re-ranking solution that exploits ratings, tags, reviews, and votes in reordering the baseline search results. Our best-performing retrieval methods outperform existing approaches on several topic sets and relevance judgments. The findings suggest that using all topic fields formulates the best search queries. The user-generated content gives better book representation if made part of the search index. Re-ranking the classical/baseline results improves relevance. The findings have implications for information science, IR, and Interactive IR. Information retrieval Information science Social web Social book search Ranking, re-ranking Khusro, Shah (orcid)0000-0002-7734-7243 aut Ahmad, Ibrar (orcid)0000-0001-6206-3160 aut Enthalten in Multimedia tools and applications Springer US, 1995 80(2020), 4 vom: 03. Okt., Seite 5131-5172 (DE-627)189064145 (DE-600)1287642-2 (DE-576)052842126 1380-7501 nnns volume:80 year:2020 number:4 day:03 month:10 pages:5131-5172 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09811-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OLC-MKW AR 80 2020 4 03 10 5131-5172 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11042-020-09811-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2123206644 (DE-He213)s11042-020-09811-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 070 004 VZ Ullah, Irfan verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-0693-5467 aut Improving social book search using structure semantics, bibliographic descriptions and social metadata 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 Abstract Social Book Search is an Information Retrieval (IR) approach that studies the impact of the Social Web on book retrieval. To understand this impact, it is necessary to develop a stronger classical baseline run by considering the contribution of query formulation, document representation, and retrieval model. Such a stronger baseline run can be re-ranked using metadata features from the Social Web to see if it improves the relevance of book search results over the classical IR approaches. However, existing studies neither considered collectively the contribution of the three mentioned factors in the baseline retrieval nor devised a re-ranking formula to exploit the collective impact of the metadata features in re-ranking. To fill these gaps in the literature, this research work first performs baseline retrieval by considering all three factors. For query formulation, it uses topic sets obtained from the discussion threads of LibraryThing. For book representation in indexing, it uses metadata from social websites including Amazon and LibraryThing. For the role of the retrieval model, it experiments with traditional, probabilistic, and fielded models. Second, it devises a re-ranking solution that exploits ratings, tags, reviews, and votes in reordering the baseline search results. Our best-performing retrieval methods outperform existing approaches on several topic sets and relevance judgments. The findings suggest that using all topic fields formulates the best search queries. The user-generated content gives better book representation if made part of the search index. Re-ranking the classical/baseline results improves relevance. The findings have implications for information science, IR, and Interactive IR. Information retrieval Information science Social web Social book search Ranking, re-ranking Khusro, Shah (orcid)0000-0002-7734-7243 aut Ahmad, Ibrar (orcid)0000-0001-6206-3160 aut Enthalten in Multimedia tools and applications Springer US, 1995 80(2020), 4 vom: 03. Okt., Seite 5131-5172 (DE-627)189064145 (DE-600)1287642-2 (DE-576)052842126 1380-7501 nnns volume:80 year:2020 number:4 day:03 month:10 pages:5131-5172 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09811-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OLC-MKW AR 80 2020 4 03 10 5131-5172 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Multimedia tools and applications 80(2020), 4 vom: 03. Okt., Seite 5131-5172 volume:80 year:2020 number:4 day:03 month:10 pages:5131-5172 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Multimedia tools and applications 80(2020), 4 vom: 03. Okt., Seite 5131-5172 volume:80 year:2020 number:4 day:03 month:10 pages:5131-5172 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Information retrieval Information science Social web Social book search Ranking, re-ranking |
| dewey-raw |
070 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Multimedia tools and applications |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ullah, Irfan @@aut@@ Khusro, Shah @@aut@@ Ahmad, Ibrar @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-10-03T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
189064145 |
| dewey-sort |
270 |
| id |
OLC2123206644 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2123206644</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230505071921.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11042-020-09811-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2123206644</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11042-020-09811-8-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">070</subfield><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ullah, Irfan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-0693-5467</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Improving social book search using structure semantics, bibliographic descriptions and social metadata</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Social Book Search is an Information Retrieval (IR) approach that studies the impact of the Social Web on book retrieval. To understand this impact, it is necessary to develop a stronger classical baseline run by considering the contribution of query formulation, document representation, and retrieval model. Such a stronger baseline run can be re-ranked using metadata features from the Social Web to see if it improves the relevance of book search results over the classical IR approaches. However, existing studies neither considered collectively the contribution of the three mentioned factors in the baseline retrieval nor devised a re-ranking formula to exploit the collective impact of the metadata features in re-ranking. To fill these gaps in the literature, this research work first performs baseline retrieval by considering all three factors. For query formulation, it uses topic sets obtained from the discussion threads of LibraryThing. For book representation in indexing, it uses metadata from social websites including Amazon and LibraryThing. For the role of the retrieval model, it experiments with traditional, probabilistic, and fielded models. Second, it devises a re-ranking solution that exploits ratings, tags, reviews, and votes in reordering the baseline search results. Our best-performing retrieval methods outperform existing approaches on several topic sets and relevance judgments. The findings suggest that using all topic fields formulates the best search queries. The user-generated content gives better book representation if made part of the search index. Re-ranking the classical/baseline results improves relevance. The findings have implications for information science, IR, and Interactive IR.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Information retrieval</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Information science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social web</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social book search</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ranking, re-ranking</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Khusro, Shah</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-7734-7243</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ahmad, Ibrar</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-6206-3160</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Multimedia tools and applications</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1995</subfield><subfield code="g">80(2020), 4 vom: 03. Okt., Seite 5131-5172</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)189064145</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1287642-2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)052842126</subfield><subfield code="x">1380-7501</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:80</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:03</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:5131-5172</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09811-8</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-BUB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MKW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">80</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">03</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">5131-5172</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Ullah, Irfan |
| spellingShingle |
Ullah, Irfan ddc 070 misc Information retrieval misc Information science misc Social web misc Social book search misc Ranking, re-ranking Improving social book search using structure semantics, bibliographic descriptions and social metadata |
| authorStr |
Ullah, Irfan |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)189064145 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
070 - News media, journalism & publishing 004 - Data processing & computer science |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1380-7501 |
| topic_title |
070 004 VZ Improving social book search using structure semantics, bibliographic descriptions and social metadata Information retrieval Information science Social web Social book search Ranking, re-ranking |
| topic |
ddc 070 misc Information retrieval misc Information science misc Social web misc Social book search misc Ranking, re-ranking |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 070 misc Information retrieval misc Information science misc Social web misc Social book search misc Ranking, re-ranking |
| topic_browse |
ddc 070 misc Information retrieval misc Information science misc Social web misc Social book search misc Ranking, re-ranking |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Multimedia tools and applications |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
189064145 |
| dewey-tens |
070 - News media, journalism & publishing 000 - Computer science, knowledge & systems |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Multimedia tools and applications |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)189064145 (DE-600)1287642-2 (DE-576)052842126 |
| title |
Improving social book search using structure semantics, bibliographic descriptions and social metadata |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2123206644 (DE-He213)s11042-020-09811-8-p |
| title_full |
Improving social book search using structure semantics, bibliographic descriptions and social metadata |
| author_sort |
Ullah, Irfan |
| journal |
Multimedia tools and applications |
| journalStr |
Multimedia tools and applications |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
000 - Computer science, information & general works |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
5131 |
| author_browse |
Ullah, Irfan Khusro, Shah Ahmad, Ibrar |
| container_volume |
80 |
| class |
070 004 VZ |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Ullah, Irfan |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11042-020-09811-8 |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0003-0693-5467 (ORCID)0000-0002-7734-7243 (ORCID)0000-0001-6206-3160 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0003-0693-5467 (orcid)0000-0002-7734-7243 (orcid)0000-0001-6206-3160 |
| dewey-full |
070 004 |
| title_sort |
improving social book search using structure semantics, bibliographic descriptions and social metadata |
| title_auth |
Improving social book search using structure semantics, bibliographic descriptions and social metadata |
| abstract |
Abstract Social Book Search is an Information Retrieval (IR) approach that studies the impact of the Social Web on book retrieval. To understand this impact, it is necessary to develop a stronger classical baseline run by considering the contribution of query formulation, document representation, and retrieval model. Such a stronger baseline run can be re-ranked using metadata features from the Social Web to see if it improves the relevance of book search results over the classical IR approaches. However, existing studies neither considered collectively the contribution of the three mentioned factors in the baseline retrieval nor devised a re-ranking formula to exploit the collective impact of the metadata features in re-ranking. To fill these gaps in the literature, this research work first performs baseline retrieval by considering all three factors. For query formulation, it uses topic sets obtained from the discussion threads of LibraryThing. For book representation in indexing, it uses metadata from social websites including Amazon and LibraryThing. For the role of the retrieval model, it experiments with traditional, probabilistic, and fielded models. Second, it devises a re-ranking solution that exploits ratings, tags, reviews, and votes in reordering the baseline search results. Our best-performing retrieval methods outperform existing approaches on several topic sets and relevance judgments. The findings suggest that using all topic fields formulates the best search queries. The user-generated content gives better book representation if made part of the search index. Re-ranking the classical/baseline results improves relevance. The findings have implications for information science, IR, and Interactive IR. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Social Book Search is an Information Retrieval (IR) approach that studies the impact of the Social Web on book retrieval. To understand this impact, it is necessary to develop a stronger classical baseline run by considering the contribution of query formulation, document representation, and retrieval model. Such a stronger baseline run can be re-ranked using metadata features from the Social Web to see if it improves the relevance of book search results over the classical IR approaches. However, existing studies neither considered collectively the contribution of the three mentioned factors in the baseline retrieval nor devised a re-ranking formula to exploit the collective impact of the metadata features in re-ranking. To fill these gaps in the literature, this research work first performs baseline retrieval by considering all three factors. For query formulation, it uses topic sets obtained from the discussion threads of LibraryThing. For book representation in indexing, it uses metadata from social websites including Amazon and LibraryThing. For the role of the retrieval model, it experiments with traditional, probabilistic, and fielded models. Second, it devises a re-ranking solution that exploits ratings, tags, reviews, and votes in reordering the baseline search results. Our best-performing retrieval methods outperform existing approaches on several topic sets and relevance judgments. The findings suggest that using all topic fields formulates the best search queries. The user-generated content gives better book representation if made part of the search index. Re-ranking the classical/baseline results improves relevance. The findings have implications for information science, IR, and Interactive IR. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Social Book Search is an Information Retrieval (IR) approach that studies the impact of the Social Web on book retrieval. To understand this impact, it is necessary to develop a stronger classical baseline run by considering the contribution of query formulation, document representation, and retrieval model. Such a stronger baseline run can be re-ranked using metadata features from the Social Web to see if it improves the relevance of book search results over the classical IR approaches. However, existing studies neither considered collectively the contribution of the three mentioned factors in the baseline retrieval nor devised a re-ranking formula to exploit the collective impact of the metadata features in re-ranking. To fill these gaps in the literature, this research work first performs baseline retrieval by considering all three factors. For query formulation, it uses topic sets obtained from the discussion threads of LibraryThing. For book representation in indexing, it uses metadata from social websites including Amazon and LibraryThing. For the role of the retrieval model, it experiments with traditional, probabilistic, and fielded models. Second, it devises a re-ranking solution that exploits ratings, tags, reviews, and votes in reordering the baseline search results. Our best-performing retrieval methods outperform existing approaches on several topic sets and relevance judgments. The findings suggest that using all topic fields formulates the best search queries. The user-generated content gives better book representation if made part of the search index. Re-ranking the classical/baseline results improves relevance. The findings have implications for information science, IR, and Interactive IR. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OLC-MKW |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
Improving social book search using structure semantics, bibliographic descriptions and social metadata |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09811-8 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Khusro, Shah Ahmad, Ibrar |
| author2Str |
Khusro, Shah Ahmad, Ibrar |
| ppnlink |
189064145 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s11042-020-09811-8 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T16:57:24.921Z |
| _version_ |
1803577820372271104 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2123206644</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230505071921.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11042-020-09811-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2123206644</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11042-020-09811-8-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">070</subfield><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ullah, Irfan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-0693-5467</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Improving social book search using structure semantics, bibliographic descriptions and social metadata</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Social Book Search is an Information Retrieval (IR) approach that studies the impact of the Social Web on book retrieval. To understand this impact, it is necessary to develop a stronger classical baseline run by considering the contribution of query formulation, document representation, and retrieval model. Such a stronger baseline run can be re-ranked using metadata features from the Social Web to see if it improves the relevance of book search results over the classical IR approaches. However, existing studies neither considered collectively the contribution of the three mentioned factors in the baseline retrieval nor devised a re-ranking formula to exploit the collective impact of the metadata features in re-ranking. To fill these gaps in the literature, this research work first performs baseline retrieval by considering all three factors. For query formulation, it uses topic sets obtained from the discussion threads of LibraryThing. For book representation in indexing, it uses metadata from social websites including Amazon and LibraryThing. For the role of the retrieval model, it experiments with traditional, probabilistic, and fielded models. Second, it devises a re-ranking solution that exploits ratings, tags, reviews, and votes in reordering the baseline search results. Our best-performing retrieval methods outperform existing approaches on several topic sets and relevance judgments. The findings suggest that using all topic fields formulates the best search queries. The user-generated content gives better book representation if made part of the search index. Re-ranking the classical/baseline results improves relevance. The findings have implications for information science, IR, and Interactive IR.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Information retrieval</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Information science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social web</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social book search</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ranking, re-ranking</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Khusro, Shah</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-7734-7243</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ahmad, Ibrar</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-6206-3160</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Multimedia tools and applications</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1995</subfield><subfield code="g">80(2020), 4 vom: 03. Okt., Seite 5131-5172</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)189064145</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1287642-2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)052842126</subfield><subfield code="x">1380-7501</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:80</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:03</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:5131-5172</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09811-8</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-BUB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MKW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">80</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">03</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">5131-5172</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398526 |