Comparison of wire-arc and powder-laser additive manufacturing for IN718 superalloy: unified consideration for selecting process parameters based on volumetric energy density
Abstract Wire-arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) as well as powder-laser additive manufacturing (PLAM) are both promising cladding additive manufacturing (AM) techniques for fabricating large IN718 superalloy parts. Correct selection of initial process parameters is an important prerequisite to ensur...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Lu, Xin [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2021 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology - Springer London, 1985, 114(2021), 5-6 vom: 30. März, Seite 1517-1531 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:114 ; year:2021 ; number:5-6 ; day:30 ; month:03 ; pages:1517-1531 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2125193736 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2125193736 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230505100245.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 230505s2021 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2125193736 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s00170-021-06990-y-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 670 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Lu, Xin |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0003-3560-3824 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of wire-arc and powder-laser additive manufacturing for IN718 superalloy: unified consideration for selecting process parameters based on volumetric energy density |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2021 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Wire-arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) as well as powder-laser additive manufacturing (PLAM) are both promising cladding additive manufacturing (AM) techniques for fabricating large IN718 superalloy parts. Correct selection of initial process parameters is an important prerequisite to ensure the success of subsequent AM stage and its dynamic adjustment. For comparing the relationship between the process parameters and their influence on the quality of WAAM and PLAM cladding beads, the relationship between the energy density and the most controllable parameters was comparatively studied from the perspective of unified energy dissipation and the weldability. The equal effective volumetric energy density can be obtained under different combinations of WAAM and PLAM parameters. The defects such as porosity formation, centerline grain boundary, and liquation cracking are mainly affected by the cladding speed, rather than the effective volumetric energy density. During WAAM and PLAM, the corresponding effective volumetric energy density range which can avoid internal and external defects is in the theoretical weldable zone of IN718 superalloy. The key to obtain a defect-free cladding bead is to properly control the energy input and its distribution. The high material utilization under equal effective power and cladding speed is the main reason why WAAM is more efficient than PLAM. According to the energy dissipation hypothesis and related formulas, different energy beam-based AM processes can be further compared under the equal energy input, which provides a basis for the selection of initial process parameters and the dynamic adjustment of main parameters. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Cladding | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Additive manufacturing | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Process parameters | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Energy density | |
| 650 | 4 | |a IN718 superalloy | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Li, Mengnie Victor |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yang, Hongbin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology |d Springer London, 1985 |g 114(2021), 5-6 vom: 30. März, Seite 1517-1531 |w (DE-627)129185299 |w (DE-600)52651-4 |w (DE-576)014456192 |x 0268-3768 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:114 |g year:2021 |g number:5-6 |g day:30 |g month:03 |g pages:1517-1531 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2018 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2333 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 114 |j 2021 |e 5-6 |b 30 |c 03 |h 1517-1531 | ||
| author_variant |
x l xl m v l mv mvl h y hy |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:02683768:2021----::oprsnfieradodraeadtvmnfcuigoi78uealynfecnieainoslcigrcs |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y doi (DE-627)OLC2125193736 (DE-He213)s00170-021-06990-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ Lu, Xin verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-3560-3824 aut Comparison of wire-arc and powder-laser additive manufacturing for IN718 superalloy: unified consideration for selecting process parameters based on volumetric energy density 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2021 Abstract Wire-arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) as well as powder-laser additive manufacturing (PLAM) are both promising cladding additive manufacturing (AM) techniques for fabricating large IN718 superalloy parts. Correct selection of initial process parameters is an important prerequisite to ensure the success of subsequent AM stage and its dynamic adjustment. For comparing the relationship between the process parameters and their influence on the quality of WAAM and PLAM cladding beads, the relationship between the energy density and the most controllable parameters was comparatively studied from the perspective of unified energy dissipation and the weldability. The equal effective volumetric energy density can be obtained under different combinations of WAAM and PLAM parameters. The defects such as porosity formation, centerline grain boundary, and liquation cracking are mainly affected by the cladding speed, rather than the effective volumetric energy density. During WAAM and PLAM, the corresponding effective volumetric energy density range which can avoid internal and external defects is in the theoretical weldable zone of IN718 superalloy. The key to obtain a defect-free cladding bead is to properly control the energy input and its distribution. The high material utilization under equal effective power and cladding speed is the main reason why WAAM is more efficient than PLAM. According to the energy dissipation hypothesis and related formulas, different energy beam-based AM processes can be further compared under the equal energy input, which provides a basis for the selection of initial process parameters and the dynamic adjustment of main parameters. Cladding Additive manufacturing Process parameters Energy density IN718 superalloy Li, Mengnie Victor aut Yang, Hongbin aut Enthalten in The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology Springer London, 1985 114(2021), 5-6 vom: 30. März, Seite 1517-1531 (DE-627)129185299 (DE-600)52651-4 (DE-576)014456192 0268-3768 nnns volume:114 year:2021 number:5-6 day:30 month:03 pages:1517-1531 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2333 AR 114 2021 5-6 30 03 1517-1531 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y doi (DE-627)OLC2125193736 (DE-He213)s00170-021-06990-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ Lu, Xin verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-3560-3824 aut Comparison of wire-arc and powder-laser additive manufacturing for IN718 superalloy: unified consideration for selecting process parameters based on volumetric energy density 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2021 Abstract Wire-arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) as well as powder-laser additive manufacturing (PLAM) are both promising cladding additive manufacturing (AM) techniques for fabricating large IN718 superalloy parts. Correct selection of initial process parameters is an important prerequisite to ensure the success of subsequent AM stage and its dynamic adjustment. For comparing the relationship between the process parameters and their influence on the quality of WAAM and PLAM cladding beads, the relationship between the energy density and the most controllable parameters was comparatively studied from the perspective of unified energy dissipation and the weldability. The equal effective volumetric energy density can be obtained under different combinations of WAAM and PLAM parameters. The defects such as porosity formation, centerline grain boundary, and liquation cracking are mainly affected by the cladding speed, rather than the effective volumetric energy density. During WAAM and PLAM, the corresponding effective volumetric energy density range which can avoid internal and external defects is in the theoretical weldable zone of IN718 superalloy. The key to obtain a defect-free cladding bead is to properly control the energy input and its distribution. The high material utilization under equal effective power and cladding speed is the main reason why WAAM is more efficient than PLAM. According to the energy dissipation hypothesis and related formulas, different energy beam-based AM processes can be further compared under the equal energy input, which provides a basis for the selection of initial process parameters and the dynamic adjustment of main parameters. Cladding Additive manufacturing Process parameters Energy density IN718 superalloy Li, Mengnie Victor aut Yang, Hongbin aut Enthalten in The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology Springer London, 1985 114(2021), 5-6 vom: 30. März, Seite 1517-1531 (DE-627)129185299 (DE-600)52651-4 (DE-576)014456192 0268-3768 nnns volume:114 year:2021 number:5-6 day:30 month:03 pages:1517-1531 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2333 AR 114 2021 5-6 30 03 1517-1531 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y doi (DE-627)OLC2125193736 (DE-He213)s00170-021-06990-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ Lu, Xin verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-3560-3824 aut Comparison of wire-arc and powder-laser additive manufacturing for IN718 superalloy: unified consideration for selecting process parameters based on volumetric energy density 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2021 Abstract Wire-arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) as well as powder-laser additive manufacturing (PLAM) are both promising cladding additive manufacturing (AM) techniques for fabricating large IN718 superalloy parts. Correct selection of initial process parameters is an important prerequisite to ensure the success of subsequent AM stage and its dynamic adjustment. For comparing the relationship between the process parameters and their influence on the quality of WAAM and PLAM cladding beads, the relationship between the energy density and the most controllable parameters was comparatively studied from the perspective of unified energy dissipation and the weldability. The equal effective volumetric energy density can be obtained under different combinations of WAAM and PLAM parameters. The defects such as porosity formation, centerline grain boundary, and liquation cracking are mainly affected by the cladding speed, rather than the effective volumetric energy density. During WAAM and PLAM, the corresponding effective volumetric energy density range which can avoid internal and external defects is in the theoretical weldable zone of IN718 superalloy. The key to obtain a defect-free cladding bead is to properly control the energy input and its distribution. The high material utilization under equal effective power and cladding speed is the main reason why WAAM is more efficient than PLAM. According to the energy dissipation hypothesis and related formulas, different energy beam-based AM processes can be further compared under the equal energy input, which provides a basis for the selection of initial process parameters and the dynamic adjustment of main parameters. Cladding Additive manufacturing Process parameters Energy density IN718 superalloy Li, Mengnie Victor aut Yang, Hongbin aut Enthalten in The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology Springer London, 1985 114(2021), 5-6 vom: 30. März, Seite 1517-1531 (DE-627)129185299 (DE-600)52651-4 (DE-576)014456192 0268-3768 nnns volume:114 year:2021 number:5-6 day:30 month:03 pages:1517-1531 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2333 AR 114 2021 5-6 30 03 1517-1531 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y doi (DE-627)OLC2125193736 (DE-He213)s00170-021-06990-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ Lu, Xin verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-3560-3824 aut Comparison of wire-arc and powder-laser additive manufacturing for IN718 superalloy: unified consideration for selecting process parameters based on volumetric energy density 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2021 Abstract Wire-arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) as well as powder-laser additive manufacturing (PLAM) are both promising cladding additive manufacturing (AM) techniques for fabricating large IN718 superalloy parts. Correct selection of initial process parameters is an important prerequisite to ensure the success of subsequent AM stage and its dynamic adjustment. For comparing the relationship between the process parameters and their influence on the quality of WAAM and PLAM cladding beads, the relationship between the energy density and the most controllable parameters was comparatively studied from the perspective of unified energy dissipation and the weldability. The equal effective volumetric energy density can be obtained under different combinations of WAAM and PLAM parameters. The defects such as porosity formation, centerline grain boundary, and liquation cracking are mainly affected by the cladding speed, rather than the effective volumetric energy density. During WAAM and PLAM, the corresponding effective volumetric energy density range which can avoid internal and external defects is in the theoretical weldable zone of IN718 superalloy. The key to obtain a defect-free cladding bead is to properly control the energy input and its distribution. The high material utilization under equal effective power and cladding speed is the main reason why WAAM is more efficient than PLAM. According to the energy dissipation hypothesis and related formulas, different energy beam-based AM processes can be further compared under the equal energy input, which provides a basis for the selection of initial process parameters and the dynamic adjustment of main parameters. Cladding Additive manufacturing Process parameters Energy density IN718 superalloy Li, Mengnie Victor aut Yang, Hongbin aut Enthalten in The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology Springer London, 1985 114(2021), 5-6 vom: 30. März, Seite 1517-1531 (DE-627)129185299 (DE-600)52651-4 (DE-576)014456192 0268-3768 nnns volume:114 year:2021 number:5-6 day:30 month:03 pages:1517-1531 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2333 AR 114 2021 5-6 30 03 1517-1531 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y doi (DE-627)OLC2125193736 (DE-He213)s00170-021-06990-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ Lu, Xin verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-3560-3824 aut Comparison of wire-arc and powder-laser additive manufacturing for IN718 superalloy: unified consideration for selecting process parameters based on volumetric energy density 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2021 Abstract Wire-arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) as well as powder-laser additive manufacturing (PLAM) are both promising cladding additive manufacturing (AM) techniques for fabricating large IN718 superalloy parts. Correct selection of initial process parameters is an important prerequisite to ensure the success of subsequent AM stage and its dynamic adjustment. For comparing the relationship between the process parameters and their influence on the quality of WAAM and PLAM cladding beads, the relationship between the energy density and the most controllable parameters was comparatively studied from the perspective of unified energy dissipation and the weldability. The equal effective volumetric energy density can be obtained under different combinations of WAAM and PLAM parameters. The defects such as porosity formation, centerline grain boundary, and liquation cracking are mainly affected by the cladding speed, rather than the effective volumetric energy density. During WAAM and PLAM, the corresponding effective volumetric energy density range which can avoid internal and external defects is in the theoretical weldable zone of IN718 superalloy. The key to obtain a defect-free cladding bead is to properly control the energy input and its distribution. The high material utilization under equal effective power and cladding speed is the main reason why WAAM is more efficient than PLAM. According to the energy dissipation hypothesis and related formulas, different energy beam-based AM processes can be further compared under the equal energy input, which provides a basis for the selection of initial process parameters and the dynamic adjustment of main parameters. Cladding Additive manufacturing Process parameters Energy density IN718 superalloy Li, Mengnie Victor aut Yang, Hongbin aut Enthalten in The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology Springer London, 1985 114(2021), 5-6 vom: 30. März, Seite 1517-1531 (DE-627)129185299 (DE-600)52651-4 (DE-576)014456192 0268-3768 nnns volume:114 year:2021 number:5-6 day:30 month:03 pages:1517-1531 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2333 AR 114 2021 5-6 30 03 1517-1531 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology 114(2021), 5-6 vom: 30. März, Seite 1517-1531 volume:114 year:2021 number:5-6 day:30 month:03 pages:1517-1531 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology 114(2021), 5-6 vom: 30. März, Seite 1517-1531 volume:114 year:2021 number:5-6 day:30 month:03 pages:1517-1531 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Cladding Additive manufacturing Process parameters Energy density IN718 superalloy |
| dewey-raw |
670 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Lu, Xin @@aut@@ Li, Mengnie Victor @@aut@@ Yang, Hongbin @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-03-30T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
129185299 |
| dewey-sort |
3670 |
| id |
OLC2125193736 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2125193736</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230505100245.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2021 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2125193736</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s00170-021-06990-y-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lu, Xin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-3560-3824</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of wire-arc and powder-laser additive manufacturing for IN718 superalloy: unified consideration for selecting process parameters based on volumetric energy density</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Wire-arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) as well as powder-laser additive manufacturing (PLAM) are both promising cladding additive manufacturing (AM) techniques for fabricating large IN718 superalloy parts. Correct selection of initial process parameters is an important prerequisite to ensure the success of subsequent AM stage and its dynamic adjustment. For comparing the relationship between the process parameters and their influence on the quality of WAAM and PLAM cladding beads, the relationship between the energy density and the most controllable parameters was comparatively studied from the perspective of unified energy dissipation and the weldability. The equal effective volumetric energy density can be obtained under different combinations of WAAM and PLAM parameters. The defects such as porosity formation, centerline grain boundary, and liquation cracking are mainly affected by the cladding speed, rather than the effective volumetric energy density. During WAAM and PLAM, the corresponding effective volumetric energy density range which can avoid internal and external defects is in the theoretical weldable zone of IN718 superalloy. The key to obtain a defect-free cladding bead is to properly control the energy input and its distribution. The high material utilization under equal effective power and cladding speed is the main reason why WAAM is more efficient than PLAM. According to the energy dissipation hypothesis and related formulas, different energy beam-based AM processes can be further compared under the equal energy input, which provides a basis for the selection of initial process parameters and the dynamic adjustment of main parameters.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cladding</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Additive manufacturing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Process parameters</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Energy density</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">IN718 superalloy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Mengnie Victor</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yang, Hongbin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer London, 1985</subfield><subfield code="g">114(2021), 5-6 vom: 30. März, Seite 1517-1531</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129185299</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)52651-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014456192</subfield><subfield code="x">0268-3768</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:114</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5-6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:30</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1517-1531</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">114</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">5-6</subfield><subfield code="b">30</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">1517-1531</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Lu, Xin |
| spellingShingle |
Lu, Xin ddc 670 misc Cladding misc Additive manufacturing misc Process parameters misc Energy density misc IN718 superalloy Comparison of wire-arc and powder-laser additive manufacturing for IN718 superalloy: unified consideration for selecting process parameters based on volumetric energy density |
| authorStr |
Lu, Xin |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129185299 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
670 - Manufacturing |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0268-3768 |
| topic_title |
670 VZ Comparison of wire-arc and powder-laser additive manufacturing for IN718 superalloy: unified consideration for selecting process parameters based on volumetric energy density Cladding Additive manufacturing Process parameters Energy density IN718 superalloy |
| topic |
ddc 670 misc Cladding misc Additive manufacturing misc Process parameters misc Energy density misc IN718 superalloy |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 670 misc Cladding misc Additive manufacturing misc Process parameters misc Energy density misc IN718 superalloy |
| topic_browse |
ddc 670 misc Cladding misc Additive manufacturing misc Process parameters misc Energy density misc IN718 superalloy |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
129185299 |
| dewey-tens |
670 - Manufacturing |
| hierarchy_top_title |
The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129185299 (DE-600)52651-4 (DE-576)014456192 |
| title |
Comparison of wire-arc and powder-laser additive manufacturing for IN718 superalloy: unified consideration for selecting process parameters based on volumetric energy density |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2125193736 (DE-He213)s00170-021-06990-y-p |
| title_full |
Comparison of wire-arc and powder-laser additive manufacturing for IN718 superalloy: unified consideration for selecting process parameters based on volumetric energy density |
| author_sort |
Lu, Xin |
| journal |
The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology |
| journalStr |
The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1517 |
| author_browse |
Lu, Xin Li, Mengnie Victor Yang, Hongbin |
| container_volume |
114 |
| class |
670 VZ |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Lu, Xin |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0003-3560-3824 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0003-3560-3824 |
| dewey-full |
670 |
| title_sort |
comparison of wire-arc and powder-laser additive manufacturing for in718 superalloy: unified consideration for selecting process parameters based on volumetric energy density |
| title_auth |
Comparison of wire-arc and powder-laser additive manufacturing for IN718 superalloy: unified consideration for selecting process parameters based on volumetric energy density |
| abstract |
Abstract Wire-arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) as well as powder-laser additive manufacturing (PLAM) are both promising cladding additive manufacturing (AM) techniques for fabricating large IN718 superalloy parts. Correct selection of initial process parameters is an important prerequisite to ensure the success of subsequent AM stage and its dynamic adjustment. For comparing the relationship between the process parameters and their influence on the quality of WAAM and PLAM cladding beads, the relationship between the energy density and the most controllable parameters was comparatively studied from the perspective of unified energy dissipation and the weldability. The equal effective volumetric energy density can be obtained under different combinations of WAAM and PLAM parameters. The defects such as porosity formation, centerline grain boundary, and liquation cracking are mainly affected by the cladding speed, rather than the effective volumetric energy density. During WAAM and PLAM, the corresponding effective volumetric energy density range which can avoid internal and external defects is in the theoretical weldable zone of IN718 superalloy. The key to obtain a defect-free cladding bead is to properly control the energy input and its distribution. The high material utilization under equal effective power and cladding speed is the main reason why WAAM is more efficient than PLAM. According to the energy dissipation hypothesis and related formulas, different energy beam-based AM processes can be further compared under the equal energy input, which provides a basis for the selection of initial process parameters and the dynamic adjustment of main parameters. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2021 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Wire-arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) as well as powder-laser additive manufacturing (PLAM) are both promising cladding additive manufacturing (AM) techniques for fabricating large IN718 superalloy parts. Correct selection of initial process parameters is an important prerequisite to ensure the success of subsequent AM stage and its dynamic adjustment. For comparing the relationship between the process parameters and their influence on the quality of WAAM and PLAM cladding beads, the relationship between the energy density and the most controllable parameters was comparatively studied from the perspective of unified energy dissipation and the weldability. The equal effective volumetric energy density can be obtained under different combinations of WAAM and PLAM parameters. The defects such as porosity formation, centerline grain boundary, and liquation cracking are mainly affected by the cladding speed, rather than the effective volumetric energy density. During WAAM and PLAM, the corresponding effective volumetric energy density range which can avoid internal and external defects is in the theoretical weldable zone of IN718 superalloy. The key to obtain a defect-free cladding bead is to properly control the energy input and its distribution. The high material utilization under equal effective power and cladding speed is the main reason why WAAM is more efficient than PLAM. According to the energy dissipation hypothesis and related formulas, different energy beam-based AM processes can be further compared under the equal energy input, which provides a basis for the selection of initial process parameters and the dynamic adjustment of main parameters. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2021 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Wire-arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) as well as powder-laser additive manufacturing (PLAM) are both promising cladding additive manufacturing (AM) techniques for fabricating large IN718 superalloy parts. Correct selection of initial process parameters is an important prerequisite to ensure the success of subsequent AM stage and its dynamic adjustment. For comparing the relationship between the process parameters and their influence on the quality of WAAM and PLAM cladding beads, the relationship between the energy density and the most controllable parameters was comparatively studied from the perspective of unified energy dissipation and the weldability. The equal effective volumetric energy density can be obtained under different combinations of WAAM and PLAM parameters. The defects such as porosity formation, centerline grain boundary, and liquation cracking are mainly affected by the cladding speed, rather than the effective volumetric energy density. During WAAM and PLAM, the corresponding effective volumetric energy density range which can avoid internal and external defects is in the theoretical weldable zone of IN718 superalloy. The key to obtain a defect-free cladding bead is to properly control the energy input and its distribution. The high material utilization under equal effective power and cladding speed is the main reason why WAAM is more efficient than PLAM. According to the energy dissipation hypothesis and related formulas, different energy beam-based AM processes can be further compared under the equal energy input, which provides a basis for the selection of initial process parameters and the dynamic adjustment of main parameters. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2021 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2333 |
| container_issue |
5-6 |
| title_short |
Comparison of wire-arc and powder-laser additive manufacturing for IN718 superalloy: unified consideration for selecting process parameters based on volumetric energy density |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Li, Mengnie Victor Yang, Hongbin |
| author2Str |
Li, Mengnie Victor Yang, Hongbin |
| ppnlink |
129185299 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T02:52:06.278Z |
| _version_ |
1803615234990014464 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2125193736</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230505100245.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2021 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2125193736</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s00170-021-06990-y-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lu, Xin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-3560-3824</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of wire-arc and powder-laser additive manufacturing for IN718 superalloy: unified consideration for selecting process parameters based on volumetric energy density</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Wire-arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) as well as powder-laser additive manufacturing (PLAM) are both promising cladding additive manufacturing (AM) techniques for fabricating large IN718 superalloy parts. Correct selection of initial process parameters is an important prerequisite to ensure the success of subsequent AM stage and its dynamic adjustment. For comparing the relationship between the process parameters and their influence on the quality of WAAM and PLAM cladding beads, the relationship between the energy density and the most controllable parameters was comparatively studied from the perspective of unified energy dissipation and the weldability. The equal effective volumetric energy density can be obtained under different combinations of WAAM and PLAM parameters. The defects such as porosity formation, centerline grain boundary, and liquation cracking are mainly affected by the cladding speed, rather than the effective volumetric energy density. During WAAM and PLAM, the corresponding effective volumetric energy density range which can avoid internal and external defects is in the theoretical weldable zone of IN718 superalloy. The key to obtain a defect-free cladding bead is to properly control the energy input and its distribution. The high material utilization under equal effective power and cladding speed is the main reason why WAAM is more efficient than PLAM. According to the energy dissipation hypothesis and related formulas, different energy beam-based AM processes can be further compared under the equal energy input, which provides a basis for the selection of initial process parameters and the dynamic adjustment of main parameters.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cladding</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Additive manufacturing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Process parameters</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Energy density</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">IN718 superalloy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Mengnie Victor</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yang, Hongbin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer London, 1985</subfield><subfield code="g">114(2021), 5-6 vom: 30. März, Seite 1517-1531</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129185299</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)52651-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014456192</subfield><subfield code="x">0268-3768</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:114</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5-6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:30</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1517-1531</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">114</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">5-6</subfield><subfield code="b">30</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">1517-1531</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4017506 |