Norms of Testimony in Broad Interdisciplinarity: The Case of Quantum Mechanics in Critical Theory

Abstract While much interdisciplinarity brings together proximate fields, broad interdisciplinarity sees integration between disciplines that are perceived to be non-neighboring. This paper argues that the heterogeneity among disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity calls for stricter epistemic norm...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Jaksland, Rasmus [verfasserIn]

Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2020

Schlagwörter:	Interdisciplinarity Expert testimony Quantum mechanics Epistemic dependence Karen Barad The affective turn

Anmerkung:	© The Author(s) 2020

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Journal for general philosophy of science - Springer Netherlands, 1990, 52(2020), 1 vom: 14. Okt., Seite 35-61
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:52 ; year:2020 ; number:1 ; day:14 ; month:10 ; pages:35-61

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1007/s10838-020-09523-5

Katalog-ID:	OLC2125288567

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	OLC2125288567
003	DE-627
005	20230505101224.0
007	tu
008	230505s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1007/s10838-020-09523-5 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)OLC2125288567
035			\|a (DE-He213)s10838-020-09523-5-p
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 000 \|a 500 \|a 100 \|q VZ
082	0	4	\|a 050 \|q VZ
084			\|a 19,2 \|a 24 \|a 5,1 \|2 ssgn
084			\|a LING \|q DE-30 \|2 fid
100	1		\|a Jaksland, Rasmus \|e verfasserin \|0 (orcid)0000-0001-9531-9994 \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Norms of Testimony in Broad Interdisciplinarity: The Case of Quantum Mechanics in Critical Theory
264		1	\|c 2020
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen \|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Band \|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © The Author(s) 2020
520			\|a Abstract While much interdisciplinarity brings together proximate fields, broad interdisciplinarity sees integration between disciplines that are perceived to be non-neighboring. This paper argues that the heterogeneity among disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity calls for stricter epistemic norms of testimony for experts that act as translators between the disciplines than those suggested for intra-scientific testimony. The paper is structured around two case studies: the affective turn in social theorizing and the use of quantum mechanics in critical theory as exemplified by Vicky Kirby’s use of work by Karen Barad. These are argued to be instances of broad interdisciplinary borrowing where few translators have joint expertise in both disciplines. For most, therefore, the engagement with for instance the integration between quantum mechanics and critical theory is possible only by the aid of translators. For those without sufficient interactional expertise, however, the epistemic credentials of the translations they inevitably rely upon are inscrutable. Furthermore, any comparison between translations is challenged since translations are argued to be few due to the cognitive divergence between disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity. Consequently, the epistemic integrity of broad interdisciplinarity can only be secured through additional norms of testimony for translators. The paper proposes that (a) all translator’s testimony in broad interdisciplinarity must aim to be neutral with respect to disputed issues within the relevant disciplines and (b) any deviation from (a) must be clearly highlighted.
650		4	\|a Interdisciplinarity
650		4	\|a Expert testimony
650		4	\|a Quantum mechanics
650		4	\|a Epistemic dependence
650		4	\|a Karen Barad
650		4	\|a The affective turn
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Journal for general philosophy of science \|d Springer Netherlands, 1990 \|g 52(2020), 1 vom: 14. Okt., Seite 35-61 \|w (DE-627)130910597 \|w (DE-600)1048887-X \|w (DE-576)025001191 \|x 0925-4560 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:52 \|g year:2020 \|g number:1 \|g day:14 \|g month:10 \|g pages:35-61
856	4	1	\|u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-020-09523-5 \|z lizenzpflichtig \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_OLC
912			\|a FID-LING
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHI
912			\|a SSG-OPC-BBI
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_50
912			\|a GBV_ILN_171
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2018
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4318
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4385
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 52 \|j 2020 \|e 1 \|b 14 \|c 10 \|h 35-61

Indexfelder

author_variant	r j rj
matchkey_str	article:09254560:2020----::omotsioynraitricpiaiyhcsoqatme
hierarchy_sort_str	2020
publishDate	2020
allfields	10.1007/s10838-020-09523-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2125288567 (DE-He213)s10838-020-09523-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 000 500 100 VZ 050 VZ 19,2 24 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid Jaksland, Rasmus verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9531-9994 aut Norms of Testimony in Broad Interdisciplinarity: The Case of Quantum Mechanics in Critical Theory 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract While much interdisciplinarity brings together proximate fields, broad interdisciplinarity sees integration between disciplines that are perceived to be non-neighboring. This paper argues that the heterogeneity among disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity calls for stricter epistemic norms of testimony for experts that act as translators between the disciplines than those suggested for intra-scientific testimony. The paper is structured around two case studies: the affective turn in social theorizing and the use of quantum mechanics in critical theory as exemplified by Vicky Kirby’s use of work by Karen Barad. These are argued to be instances of broad interdisciplinary borrowing where few translators have joint expertise in both disciplines. For most, therefore, the engagement with for instance the integration between quantum mechanics and critical theory is possible only by the aid of translators. For those without sufficient interactional expertise, however, the epistemic credentials of the translations they inevitably rely upon are inscrutable. Furthermore, any comparison between translations is challenged since translations are argued to be few due to the cognitive divergence between disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity. Consequently, the epistemic integrity of broad interdisciplinarity can only be secured through additional norms of testimony for translators. The paper proposes that (a) all translator’s testimony in broad interdisciplinarity must aim to be neutral with respect to disputed issues within the relevant disciplines and (b) any deviation from (a) must be clearly highlighted. Interdisciplinarity Expert testimony Quantum mechanics Epistemic dependence Karen Barad The affective turn Enthalten in Journal for general philosophy of science Springer Netherlands, 1990 52(2020), 1 vom: 14. Okt., Seite 35-61 (DE-627)130910597 (DE-600)1048887-X (DE-576)025001191 0925-4560 nnns volume:52 year:2020 number:1 day:14 month:10 pages:35-61 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-020-09523-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_50 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4385 AR 52 2020 1 14 10 35-61
spelling	10.1007/s10838-020-09523-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2125288567 (DE-He213)s10838-020-09523-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 000 500 100 VZ 050 VZ 19,2 24 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid Jaksland, Rasmus verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9531-9994 aut Norms of Testimony in Broad Interdisciplinarity: The Case of Quantum Mechanics in Critical Theory 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract While much interdisciplinarity brings together proximate fields, broad interdisciplinarity sees integration between disciplines that are perceived to be non-neighboring. This paper argues that the heterogeneity among disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity calls for stricter epistemic norms of testimony for experts that act as translators between the disciplines than those suggested for intra-scientific testimony. The paper is structured around two case studies: the affective turn in social theorizing and the use of quantum mechanics in critical theory as exemplified by Vicky Kirby’s use of work by Karen Barad. These are argued to be instances of broad interdisciplinary borrowing where few translators have joint expertise in both disciplines. For most, therefore, the engagement with for instance the integration between quantum mechanics and critical theory is possible only by the aid of translators. For those without sufficient interactional expertise, however, the epistemic credentials of the translations they inevitably rely upon are inscrutable. Furthermore, any comparison between translations is challenged since translations are argued to be few due to the cognitive divergence between disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity. Consequently, the epistemic integrity of broad interdisciplinarity can only be secured through additional norms of testimony for translators. The paper proposes that (a) all translator’s testimony in broad interdisciplinarity must aim to be neutral with respect to disputed issues within the relevant disciplines and (b) any deviation from (a) must be clearly highlighted. Interdisciplinarity Expert testimony Quantum mechanics Epistemic dependence Karen Barad The affective turn Enthalten in Journal for general philosophy of science Springer Netherlands, 1990 52(2020), 1 vom: 14. Okt., Seite 35-61 (DE-627)130910597 (DE-600)1048887-X (DE-576)025001191 0925-4560 nnns volume:52 year:2020 number:1 day:14 month:10 pages:35-61 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-020-09523-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_50 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4385 AR 52 2020 1 14 10 35-61
allfields_unstemmed	10.1007/s10838-020-09523-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2125288567 (DE-He213)s10838-020-09523-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 000 500 100 VZ 050 VZ 19,2 24 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid Jaksland, Rasmus verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9531-9994 aut Norms of Testimony in Broad Interdisciplinarity: The Case of Quantum Mechanics in Critical Theory 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract While much interdisciplinarity brings together proximate fields, broad interdisciplinarity sees integration between disciplines that are perceived to be non-neighboring. This paper argues that the heterogeneity among disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity calls for stricter epistemic norms of testimony for experts that act as translators between the disciplines than those suggested for intra-scientific testimony. The paper is structured around two case studies: the affective turn in social theorizing and the use of quantum mechanics in critical theory as exemplified by Vicky Kirby’s use of work by Karen Barad. These are argued to be instances of broad interdisciplinary borrowing where few translators have joint expertise in both disciplines. For most, therefore, the engagement with for instance the integration between quantum mechanics and critical theory is possible only by the aid of translators. For those without sufficient interactional expertise, however, the epistemic credentials of the translations they inevitably rely upon are inscrutable. Furthermore, any comparison between translations is challenged since translations are argued to be few due to the cognitive divergence between disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity. Consequently, the epistemic integrity of broad interdisciplinarity can only be secured through additional norms of testimony for translators. The paper proposes that (a) all translator’s testimony in broad interdisciplinarity must aim to be neutral with respect to disputed issues within the relevant disciplines and (b) any deviation from (a) must be clearly highlighted. Interdisciplinarity Expert testimony Quantum mechanics Epistemic dependence Karen Barad The affective turn Enthalten in Journal for general philosophy of science Springer Netherlands, 1990 52(2020), 1 vom: 14. Okt., Seite 35-61 (DE-627)130910597 (DE-600)1048887-X (DE-576)025001191 0925-4560 nnns volume:52 year:2020 number:1 day:14 month:10 pages:35-61 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-020-09523-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_50 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4385 AR 52 2020 1 14 10 35-61
allfieldsGer	10.1007/s10838-020-09523-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2125288567 (DE-He213)s10838-020-09523-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 000 500 100 VZ 050 VZ 19,2 24 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid Jaksland, Rasmus verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9531-9994 aut Norms of Testimony in Broad Interdisciplinarity: The Case of Quantum Mechanics in Critical Theory 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract While much interdisciplinarity brings together proximate fields, broad interdisciplinarity sees integration between disciplines that are perceived to be non-neighboring. This paper argues that the heterogeneity among disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity calls for stricter epistemic norms of testimony for experts that act as translators between the disciplines than those suggested for intra-scientific testimony. The paper is structured around two case studies: the affective turn in social theorizing and the use of quantum mechanics in critical theory as exemplified by Vicky Kirby’s use of work by Karen Barad. These are argued to be instances of broad interdisciplinary borrowing where few translators have joint expertise in both disciplines. For most, therefore, the engagement with for instance the integration between quantum mechanics and critical theory is possible only by the aid of translators. For those without sufficient interactional expertise, however, the epistemic credentials of the translations they inevitably rely upon are inscrutable. Furthermore, any comparison between translations is challenged since translations are argued to be few due to the cognitive divergence between disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity. Consequently, the epistemic integrity of broad interdisciplinarity can only be secured through additional norms of testimony for translators. The paper proposes that (a) all translator’s testimony in broad interdisciplinarity must aim to be neutral with respect to disputed issues within the relevant disciplines and (b) any deviation from (a) must be clearly highlighted. Interdisciplinarity Expert testimony Quantum mechanics Epistemic dependence Karen Barad The affective turn Enthalten in Journal for general philosophy of science Springer Netherlands, 1990 52(2020), 1 vom: 14. Okt., Seite 35-61 (DE-627)130910597 (DE-600)1048887-X (DE-576)025001191 0925-4560 nnns volume:52 year:2020 number:1 day:14 month:10 pages:35-61 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-020-09523-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_50 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4385 AR 52 2020 1 14 10 35-61
allfieldsSound	10.1007/s10838-020-09523-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2125288567 (DE-He213)s10838-020-09523-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 000 500 100 VZ 050 VZ 19,2 24 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid Jaksland, Rasmus verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9531-9994 aut Norms of Testimony in Broad Interdisciplinarity: The Case of Quantum Mechanics in Critical Theory 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract While much interdisciplinarity brings together proximate fields, broad interdisciplinarity sees integration between disciplines that are perceived to be non-neighboring. This paper argues that the heterogeneity among disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity calls for stricter epistemic norms of testimony for experts that act as translators between the disciplines than those suggested for intra-scientific testimony. The paper is structured around two case studies: the affective turn in social theorizing and the use of quantum mechanics in critical theory as exemplified by Vicky Kirby’s use of work by Karen Barad. These are argued to be instances of broad interdisciplinary borrowing where few translators have joint expertise in both disciplines. For most, therefore, the engagement with for instance the integration between quantum mechanics and critical theory is possible only by the aid of translators. For those without sufficient interactional expertise, however, the epistemic credentials of the translations they inevitably rely upon are inscrutable. Furthermore, any comparison between translations is challenged since translations are argued to be few due to the cognitive divergence between disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity. Consequently, the epistemic integrity of broad interdisciplinarity can only be secured through additional norms of testimony for translators. The paper proposes that (a) all translator’s testimony in broad interdisciplinarity must aim to be neutral with respect to disputed issues within the relevant disciplines and (b) any deviation from (a) must be clearly highlighted. Interdisciplinarity Expert testimony Quantum mechanics Epistemic dependence Karen Barad The affective turn Enthalten in Journal for general philosophy of science Springer Netherlands, 1990 52(2020), 1 vom: 14. Okt., Seite 35-61 (DE-627)130910597 (DE-600)1048887-X (DE-576)025001191 0925-4560 nnns volume:52 year:2020 number:1 day:14 month:10 pages:35-61 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-020-09523-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_50 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4385 AR 52 2020 1 14 10 35-61
language	English
source	Enthalten in Journal for general philosophy of science 52(2020), 1 vom: 14. Okt., Seite 35-61 volume:52 year:2020 number:1 day:14 month:10 pages:35-61
sourceStr	Enthalten in Journal for general philosophy of science 52(2020), 1 vom: 14. Okt., Seite 35-61 volume:52 year:2020 number:1 day:14 month:10 pages:35-61
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Interdisciplinarity Expert testimony Quantum mechanics Epistemic dependence Karen Barad The affective turn
dewey-raw	000
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Journal for general philosophy of science
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Jaksland, Rasmus @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2020-10-14T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	130910597
dewey-sort	0
id	OLC2125288567
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2125288567</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230505101224.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10838-020-09523-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2125288567</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10838-020-09523-5-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">000</subfield><subfield code="a">500</subfield><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">050</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">19,2</subfield><subfield code="a">24</subfield><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jaksland, Rasmus</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-9531-9994</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Norms of Testimony in Broad Interdisciplinarity: The Case of Quantum Mechanics in Critical Theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract While much interdisciplinarity brings together proximate fields, broad interdisciplinarity sees integration between disciplines that are perceived to be non-neighboring. This paper argues that the heterogeneity among disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity calls for stricter epistemic norms of testimony for experts that act as translators between the disciplines than those suggested for intra-scientific testimony. The paper is structured around two case studies: the affective turn in social theorizing and the use of quantum mechanics in critical theory as exemplified by Vicky Kirby’s use of work by Karen Barad. These are argued to be instances of broad interdisciplinary borrowing where few translators have joint expertise in both disciplines. For most, therefore, the engagement with for instance the integration between quantum mechanics and critical theory is possible only by the aid of translators. For those without sufficient interactional expertise, however, the epistemic credentials of the translations they inevitably rely upon are inscrutable. Furthermore, any comparison between translations is challenged since translations are argued to be few due to the cognitive divergence between disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity. Consequently, the epistemic integrity of broad interdisciplinarity can only be secured through additional norms of testimony for translators. The paper proposes that (a) all translator’s testimony in broad interdisciplinarity must aim to be neutral with respect to disputed issues within the relevant disciplines and (b) any deviation from (a) must be clearly highlighted.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Interdisciplinarity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Expert testimony</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Quantum mechanics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Epistemic dependence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Karen Barad</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The affective turn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal for general philosophy of science</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1990</subfield><subfield code="g">52(2020), 1 vom: 14. Okt., Seite 35-61</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130910597</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1048887-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)025001191</subfield><subfield code="x">0925-4560</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:52</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:14</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:35-61</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-020-09523-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-BBI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_50</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4385</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">52</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">14</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">35-61</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Jaksland, Rasmus
spellingShingle	Jaksland, Rasmus ddc 000 ddc 050 ssgn 19,2 fid LING misc Interdisciplinarity misc Expert testimony misc Quantum mechanics misc Epistemic dependence misc Karen Barad misc The affective turn Norms of Testimony in Broad Interdisciplinarity: The Case of Quantum Mechanics in Critical Theory
authorStr	Jaksland, Rasmus
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)130910597
format	Article
dewey-ones	000 - Computer science, information & general works 500 - Natural sciences & mathematics 100 - Philosophy & psychology 050 - General serial publications
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	OLC
remote_str	false
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0925-4560
topic_title	000 500 100 VZ 050 VZ 19,2 24 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid Norms of Testimony in Broad Interdisciplinarity: The Case of Quantum Mechanics in Critical Theory Interdisciplinarity Expert testimony Quantum mechanics Epistemic dependence Karen Barad The affective turn
topic	ddc 000 ddc 050 ssgn 19,2 fid LING misc Interdisciplinarity misc Expert testimony misc Quantum mechanics misc Epistemic dependence misc Karen Barad misc The affective turn
topic_unstemmed	ddc 000 ddc 050 ssgn 19,2 fid LING misc Interdisciplinarity misc Expert testimony misc Quantum mechanics misc Epistemic dependence misc Karen Barad misc The affective turn
topic_browse	ddc 000 ddc 050 ssgn 19,2 fid LING misc Interdisciplinarity misc Expert testimony misc Quantum mechanics misc Epistemic dependence misc Karen Barad misc The affective turn
format_facet	Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	nc
hierarchy_parent_title	Journal for general philosophy of science
hierarchy_parent_id	130910597
dewey-tens	000 - Computer science, knowledge & systems 500 - Science 100 - Philosophy 050 - Magazines, journals & serials
hierarchy_top_title	Journal for general philosophy of science
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)130910597 (DE-600)1048887-X (DE-576)025001191
title	Norms of Testimony in Broad Interdisciplinarity: The Case of Quantum Mechanics in Critical Theory
ctrlnum	(DE-627)OLC2125288567 (DE-He213)s10838-020-09523-5-p
title_full	Norms of Testimony in Broad Interdisciplinarity: The Case of Quantum Mechanics in Critical Theory
author_sort	Jaksland, Rasmus
journal	Journal for general philosophy of science
journalStr	Journal for general philosophy of science
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	000 - Computer science, information & general works 500 - Science 100 - Philosophy & psychology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2020
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	35
author_browse	Jaksland, Rasmus
container_volume	52
class	000 500 100 VZ 050 VZ 19,2 24 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid
format_se	Aufsätze
author-letter	Jaksland, Rasmus
doi_str_mv	10.1007/s10838-020-09523-5
normlink	(ORCID)0000-0001-9531-9994
normlink_prefix_str_mv	(orcid)0000-0001-9531-9994
dewey-full	000 500 100 050
title_sort	norms of testimony in broad interdisciplinarity: the case of quantum mechanics in critical theory
title_auth	Norms of Testimony in Broad Interdisciplinarity: The Case of Quantum Mechanics in Critical Theory
abstract	Abstract While much interdisciplinarity brings together proximate fields, broad interdisciplinarity sees integration between disciplines that are perceived to be non-neighboring. This paper argues that the heterogeneity among disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity calls for stricter epistemic norms of testimony for experts that act as translators between the disciplines than those suggested for intra-scientific testimony. The paper is structured around two case studies: the affective turn in social theorizing and the use of quantum mechanics in critical theory as exemplified by Vicky Kirby’s use of work by Karen Barad. These are argued to be instances of broad interdisciplinary borrowing where few translators have joint expertise in both disciplines. For most, therefore, the engagement with for instance the integration between quantum mechanics and critical theory is possible only by the aid of translators. For those without sufficient interactional expertise, however, the epistemic credentials of the translations they inevitably rely upon are inscrutable. Furthermore, any comparison between translations is challenged since translations are argued to be few due to the cognitive divergence between disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity. Consequently, the epistemic integrity of broad interdisciplinarity can only be secured through additional norms of testimony for translators. The paper proposes that (a) all translator’s testimony in broad interdisciplinarity must aim to be neutral with respect to disputed issues within the relevant disciplines and (b) any deviation from (a) must be clearly highlighted. © The Author(s) 2020
abstractGer	Abstract While much interdisciplinarity brings together proximate fields, broad interdisciplinarity sees integration between disciplines that are perceived to be non-neighboring. This paper argues that the heterogeneity among disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity calls for stricter epistemic norms of testimony for experts that act as translators between the disciplines than those suggested for intra-scientific testimony. The paper is structured around two case studies: the affective turn in social theorizing and the use of quantum mechanics in critical theory as exemplified by Vicky Kirby’s use of work by Karen Barad. These are argued to be instances of broad interdisciplinary borrowing where few translators have joint expertise in both disciplines. For most, therefore, the engagement with for instance the integration between quantum mechanics and critical theory is possible only by the aid of translators. For those without sufficient interactional expertise, however, the epistemic credentials of the translations they inevitably rely upon are inscrutable. Furthermore, any comparison between translations is challenged since translations are argued to be few due to the cognitive divergence between disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity. Consequently, the epistemic integrity of broad interdisciplinarity can only be secured through additional norms of testimony for translators. The paper proposes that (a) all translator’s testimony in broad interdisciplinarity must aim to be neutral with respect to disputed issues within the relevant disciplines and (b) any deviation from (a) must be clearly highlighted. © The Author(s) 2020
abstract_unstemmed	Abstract While much interdisciplinarity brings together proximate fields, broad interdisciplinarity sees integration between disciplines that are perceived to be non-neighboring. This paper argues that the heterogeneity among disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity calls for stricter epistemic norms of testimony for experts that act as translators between the disciplines than those suggested for intra-scientific testimony. The paper is structured around two case studies: the affective turn in social theorizing and the use of quantum mechanics in critical theory as exemplified by Vicky Kirby’s use of work by Karen Barad. These are argued to be instances of broad interdisciplinary borrowing where few translators have joint expertise in both disciplines. For most, therefore, the engagement with for instance the integration between quantum mechanics and critical theory is possible only by the aid of translators. For those without sufficient interactional expertise, however, the epistemic credentials of the translations they inevitably rely upon are inscrutable. Furthermore, any comparison between translations is challenged since translations are argued to be few due to the cognitive divergence between disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity. Consequently, the epistemic integrity of broad interdisciplinarity can only be secured through additional norms of testimony for translators. The paper proposes that (a) all translator’s testimony in broad interdisciplinarity must aim to be neutral with respect to disputed issues within the relevant disciplines and (b) any deviation from (a) must be clearly highlighted. © The Author(s) 2020
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_50 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4385
container_issue	1
title_short	Norms of Testimony in Broad Interdisciplinarity: The Case of Quantum Mechanics in Critical Theory
url	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-020-09523-5
remote_bool	false
ppnlink	130910597
mediatype_str_mv	n
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1007/s10838-020-09523-5
up_date	2024-07-04T03:11:56.074Z
_version_	1803616482586787841
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2125288567</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230505101224.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10838-020-09523-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2125288567</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10838-020-09523-5-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">000</subfield><subfield code="a">500</subfield><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">050</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">19,2</subfield><subfield code="a">24</subfield><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jaksland, Rasmus</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-9531-9994</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Norms of Testimony in Broad Interdisciplinarity: The Case of Quantum Mechanics in Critical Theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract While much interdisciplinarity brings together proximate fields, broad interdisciplinarity sees integration between disciplines that are perceived to be non-neighboring. This paper argues that the heterogeneity among disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity calls for stricter epistemic norms of testimony for experts that act as translators between the disciplines than those suggested for intra-scientific testimony. The paper is structured around two case studies: the affective turn in social theorizing and the use of quantum mechanics in critical theory as exemplified by Vicky Kirby’s use of work by Karen Barad. These are argued to be instances of broad interdisciplinary borrowing where few translators have joint expertise in both disciplines. For most, therefore, the engagement with for instance the integration between quantum mechanics and critical theory is possible only by the aid of translators. For those without sufficient interactional expertise, however, the epistemic credentials of the translations they inevitably rely upon are inscrutable. Furthermore, any comparison between translations is challenged since translations are argued to be few due to the cognitive divergence between disciplines in broad interdisciplinarity. Consequently, the epistemic integrity of broad interdisciplinarity can only be secured through additional norms of testimony for translators. The paper proposes that (a) all translator’s testimony in broad interdisciplinarity must aim to be neutral with respect to disputed issues within the relevant disciplines and (b) any deviation from (a) must be clearly highlighted.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Interdisciplinarity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Expert testimony</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Quantum mechanics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Epistemic dependence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Karen Barad</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The affective turn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal for general philosophy of science</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1990</subfield><subfield code="g">52(2020), 1 vom: 14. Okt., Seite 35-61</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130910597</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1048887-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)025001191</subfield><subfield code="x">0925-4560</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:52</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:14</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:35-61</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-020-09523-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-BBI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_50</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4385</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">52</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">14</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">35-61</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3994036

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Norms of Testimony in Broad Interdisciplinarity: The Case of Quantum Mechanics in Critical Theory

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?