Techno-economic analysis of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass–a comparison of fermentation, thermo catalytic, and chemocatalytic technologies
Bioethanol produced from 2nd generation biomass comprising of agricultural residues and forest wastes is a viable alternate fuel. Besides fermentation and biomass gasification to syngas and its further conversion to ethanol, a direct chemocatalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into ethanol...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Devi, Asha [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2021 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Bioprocess and biosystems engineering - Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001, 44(2021), 6 vom: 04. Feb., Seite 1093-1107 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:44 ; year:2021 ; number:6 ; day:04 ; month:02 ; pages:1093-1107 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s00449-020-02504-4 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC2125659409 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2125659409 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230505104313.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 230505s2021 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00449-020-02504-4 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2125659409 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s00449-020-02504-4-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 660 |q VZ |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |a 690 |a 540 |q VZ |
084 | |a 12 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Devi, Asha |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Techno-economic analysis of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass–a comparison of fermentation, thermo catalytic, and chemocatalytic technologies |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021 | ||
520 | |a Bioethanol produced from 2nd generation biomass comprising of agricultural residues and forest wastes is a viable alternate fuel. Besides fermentation and biomass gasification to syngas and its further conversion to ethanol, a direct chemocatalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into ethanol is being investigated as a viable route which avoids the emission of greenhouse gases. In this work, a detailed configuration of chemocatalytic route is simulated and optimized for minimizing the cost of ethanol production. The economic feasibility of ethanol production through the chemocatalytic pathway is analyzed. The techno-economic analysis is conducted in terms of ethanol selectivity and ethanol production cost. The obtained results show that biomass feedstock and catalyst have major contributions to the production cost. The proposed route is found to be giving a lower ethanol selling price as compared to the well-researched routes of biomass fermentation to ethanol and biomass gasification followed by syngas conversion to ethanol. Graphic abstract | ||
650 | 4 | |a Techno-economic | |
650 | 4 | |a Chemocatalytic process | |
650 | 4 | |a Ethanol | |
650 | 4 | |a Lignocellulosic biomass | |
650 | 4 | |a Minimum ethanol selling price | |
700 | 1 | |a Niazi, Ambreen |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ramteke, Manojkumar |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Upadhyayula, Sreedevi |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioprocess and biosystems engineering |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001 |g 44(2021), 6 vom: 04. Feb., Seite 1093-1107 |w (DE-627)333469763 |w (DE-600)2056063-1 |w (DE-576)094533709 |x 1615-7591 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:44 |g year:2021 |g number:6 |g day:04 |g month:02 |g pages:1093-1107 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-020-02504-4 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-UMW | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-ARC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-CHE | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2018 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4277 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 44 |j 2021 |e 6 |b 04 |c 02 |h 1093-1107 |
author_variant |
a d ad a n an m r mr s u su |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:16157591:2021----::ehocnmcnlssftaopoutofolgoellscimsaoprsnfemnainhroaa |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
publishDate |
2021 |
allfields |
10.1007/s00449-020-02504-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2125659409 (DE-He213)s00449-020-02504-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 VZ 570 690 540 VZ 12 ssgn Devi, Asha verfasserin aut Techno-economic analysis of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass–a comparison of fermentation, thermo catalytic, and chemocatalytic technologies 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021 Bioethanol produced from 2nd generation biomass comprising of agricultural residues and forest wastes is a viable alternate fuel. Besides fermentation and biomass gasification to syngas and its further conversion to ethanol, a direct chemocatalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into ethanol is being investigated as a viable route which avoids the emission of greenhouse gases. In this work, a detailed configuration of chemocatalytic route is simulated and optimized for minimizing the cost of ethanol production. The economic feasibility of ethanol production through the chemocatalytic pathway is analyzed. The techno-economic analysis is conducted in terms of ethanol selectivity and ethanol production cost. The obtained results show that biomass feedstock and catalyst have major contributions to the production cost. The proposed route is found to be giving a lower ethanol selling price as compared to the well-researched routes of biomass fermentation to ethanol and biomass gasification followed by syngas conversion to ethanol. Graphic abstract Techno-economic Chemocatalytic process Ethanol Lignocellulosic biomass Minimum ethanol selling price Niazi, Ambreen aut Ramteke, Manojkumar aut Upadhyayula, Sreedevi aut Enthalten in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001 44(2021), 6 vom: 04. Feb., Seite 1093-1107 (DE-627)333469763 (DE-600)2056063-1 (DE-576)094533709 1615-7591 nnns volume:44 year:2021 number:6 day:04 month:02 pages:1093-1107 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-020-02504-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4277 AR 44 2021 6 04 02 1093-1107 |
spelling |
10.1007/s00449-020-02504-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2125659409 (DE-He213)s00449-020-02504-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 VZ 570 690 540 VZ 12 ssgn Devi, Asha verfasserin aut Techno-economic analysis of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass–a comparison of fermentation, thermo catalytic, and chemocatalytic technologies 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021 Bioethanol produced from 2nd generation biomass comprising of agricultural residues and forest wastes is a viable alternate fuel. Besides fermentation and biomass gasification to syngas and its further conversion to ethanol, a direct chemocatalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into ethanol is being investigated as a viable route which avoids the emission of greenhouse gases. In this work, a detailed configuration of chemocatalytic route is simulated and optimized for minimizing the cost of ethanol production. The economic feasibility of ethanol production through the chemocatalytic pathway is analyzed. The techno-economic analysis is conducted in terms of ethanol selectivity and ethanol production cost. The obtained results show that biomass feedstock and catalyst have major contributions to the production cost. The proposed route is found to be giving a lower ethanol selling price as compared to the well-researched routes of biomass fermentation to ethanol and biomass gasification followed by syngas conversion to ethanol. Graphic abstract Techno-economic Chemocatalytic process Ethanol Lignocellulosic biomass Minimum ethanol selling price Niazi, Ambreen aut Ramteke, Manojkumar aut Upadhyayula, Sreedevi aut Enthalten in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001 44(2021), 6 vom: 04. Feb., Seite 1093-1107 (DE-627)333469763 (DE-600)2056063-1 (DE-576)094533709 1615-7591 nnns volume:44 year:2021 number:6 day:04 month:02 pages:1093-1107 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-020-02504-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4277 AR 44 2021 6 04 02 1093-1107 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s00449-020-02504-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2125659409 (DE-He213)s00449-020-02504-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 VZ 570 690 540 VZ 12 ssgn Devi, Asha verfasserin aut Techno-economic analysis of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass–a comparison of fermentation, thermo catalytic, and chemocatalytic technologies 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021 Bioethanol produced from 2nd generation biomass comprising of agricultural residues and forest wastes is a viable alternate fuel. Besides fermentation and biomass gasification to syngas and its further conversion to ethanol, a direct chemocatalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into ethanol is being investigated as a viable route which avoids the emission of greenhouse gases. In this work, a detailed configuration of chemocatalytic route is simulated and optimized for minimizing the cost of ethanol production. The economic feasibility of ethanol production through the chemocatalytic pathway is analyzed. The techno-economic analysis is conducted in terms of ethanol selectivity and ethanol production cost. The obtained results show that biomass feedstock and catalyst have major contributions to the production cost. The proposed route is found to be giving a lower ethanol selling price as compared to the well-researched routes of biomass fermentation to ethanol and biomass gasification followed by syngas conversion to ethanol. Graphic abstract Techno-economic Chemocatalytic process Ethanol Lignocellulosic biomass Minimum ethanol selling price Niazi, Ambreen aut Ramteke, Manojkumar aut Upadhyayula, Sreedevi aut Enthalten in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001 44(2021), 6 vom: 04. Feb., Seite 1093-1107 (DE-627)333469763 (DE-600)2056063-1 (DE-576)094533709 1615-7591 nnns volume:44 year:2021 number:6 day:04 month:02 pages:1093-1107 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-020-02504-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4277 AR 44 2021 6 04 02 1093-1107 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s00449-020-02504-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2125659409 (DE-He213)s00449-020-02504-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 VZ 570 690 540 VZ 12 ssgn Devi, Asha verfasserin aut Techno-economic analysis of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass–a comparison of fermentation, thermo catalytic, and chemocatalytic technologies 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021 Bioethanol produced from 2nd generation biomass comprising of agricultural residues and forest wastes is a viable alternate fuel. Besides fermentation and biomass gasification to syngas and its further conversion to ethanol, a direct chemocatalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into ethanol is being investigated as a viable route which avoids the emission of greenhouse gases. In this work, a detailed configuration of chemocatalytic route is simulated and optimized for minimizing the cost of ethanol production. The economic feasibility of ethanol production through the chemocatalytic pathway is analyzed. The techno-economic analysis is conducted in terms of ethanol selectivity and ethanol production cost. The obtained results show that biomass feedstock and catalyst have major contributions to the production cost. The proposed route is found to be giving a lower ethanol selling price as compared to the well-researched routes of biomass fermentation to ethanol and biomass gasification followed by syngas conversion to ethanol. Graphic abstract Techno-economic Chemocatalytic process Ethanol Lignocellulosic biomass Minimum ethanol selling price Niazi, Ambreen aut Ramteke, Manojkumar aut Upadhyayula, Sreedevi aut Enthalten in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001 44(2021), 6 vom: 04. Feb., Seite 1093-1107 (DE-627)333469763 (DE-600)2056063-1 (DE-576)094533709 1615-7591 nnns volume:44 year:2021 number:6 day:04 month:02 pages:1093-1107 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-020-02504-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4277 AR 44 2021 6 04 02 1093-1107 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s00449-020-02504-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2125659409 (DE-He213)s00449-020-02504-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 VZ 570 690 540 VZ 12 ssgn Devi, Asha verfasserin aut Techno-economic analysis of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass–a comparison of fermentation, thermo catalytic, and chemocatalytic technologies 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021 Bioethanol produced from 2nd generation biomass comprising of agricultural residues and forest wastes is a viable alternate fuel. Besides fermentation and biomass gasification to syngas and its further conversion to ethanol, a direct chemocatalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into ethanol is being investigated as a viable route which avoids the emission of greenhouse gases. In this work, a detailed configuration of chemocatalytic route is simulated and optimized for minimizing the cost of ethanol production. The economic feasibility of ethanol production through the chemocatalytic pathway is analyzed. The techno-economic analysis is conducted in terms of ethanol selectivity and ethanol production cost. The obtained results show that biomass feedstock and catalyst have major contributions to the production cost. The proposed route is found to be giving a lower ethanol selling price as compared to the well-researched routes of biomass fermentation to ethanol and biomass gasification followed by syngas conversion to ethanol. Graphic abstract Techno-economic Chemocatalytic process Ethanol Lignocellulosic biomass Minimum ethanol selling price Niazi, Ambreen aut Ramteke, Manojkumar aut Upadhyayula, Sreedevi aut Enthalten in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001 44(2021), 6 vom: 04. Feb., Seite 1093-1107 (DE-627)333469763 (DE-600)2056063-1 (DE-576)094533709 1615-7591 nnns volume:44 year:2021 number:6 day:04 month:02 pages:1093-1107 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-020-02504-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4277 AR 44 2021 6 04 02 1093-1107 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering 44(2021), 6 vom: 04. Feb., Seite 1093-1107 volume:44 year:2021 number:6 day:04 month:02 pages:1093-1107 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering 44(2021), 6 vom: 04. Feb., Seite 1093-1107 volume:44 year:2021 number:6 day:04 month:02 pages:1093-1107 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Techno-economic Chemocatalytic process Ethanol Lignocellulosic biomass Minimum ethanol selling price |
dewey-raw |
660 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Bioprocess and biosystems engineering |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Devi, Asha @@aut@@ Niazi, Ambreen @@aut@@ Ramteke, Manojkumar @@aut@@ Upadhyayula, Sreedevi @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-02-04T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
333469763 |
dewey-sort |
3660 |
id |
OLC2125659409 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2125659409</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230505104313.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2021 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00449-020-02504-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2125659409</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s00449-020-02504-4-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Devi, Asha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Techno-economic analysis of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass–a comparison of fermentation, thermo catalytic, and chemocatalytic technologies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bioethanol produced from 2nd generation biomass comprising of agricultural residues and forest wastes is a viable alternate fuel. Besides fermentation and biomass gasification to syngas and its further conversion to ethanol, a direct chemocatalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into ethanol is being investigated as a viable route which avoids the emission of greenhouse gases. In this work, a detailed configuration of chemocatalytic route is simulated and optimized for minimizing the cost of ethanol production. The economic feasibility of ethanol production through the chemocatalytic pathway is analyzed. The techno-economic analysis is conducted in terms of ethanol selectivity and ethanol production cost. The obtained results show that biomass feedstock and catalyst have major contributions to the production cost. The proposed route is found to be giving a lower ethanol selling price as compared to the well-researched routes of biomass fermentation to ethanol and biomass gasification followed by syngas conversion to ethanol. Graphic abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Techno-economic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Chemocatalytic process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethanol</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lignocellulosic biomass</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Minimum ethanol selling price</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Niazi, Ambreen</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ramteke, Manojkumar</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Upadhyayula, Sreedevi</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bioprocess and biosystems engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">44(2021), 6 vom: 04. Feb., Seite 1093-1107</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)333469763</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2056063-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)094533709</subfield><subfield code="x">1615-7591</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:44</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:04</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1093-1107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-020-02504-4</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">44</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="b">04</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">1093-1107</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Devi, Asha |
spellingShingle |
Devi, Asha ddc 660 ddc 570 ssgn 12 misc Techno-economic misc Chemocatalytic process misc Ethanol misc Lignocellulosic biomass misc Minimum ethanol selling price Techno-economic analysis of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass–a comparison of fermentation, thermo catalytic, and chemocatalytic technologies |
authorStr |
Devi, Asha |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)333469763 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
660 - Chemical engineering 570 - Life sciences; biology 690 - Buildings 540 - Chemistry & allied sciences |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1615-7591 |
topic_title |
660 VZ 570 690 540 VZ 12 ssgn Techno-economic analysis of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass–a comparison of fermentation, thermo catalytic, and chemocatalytic technologies Techno-economic Chemocatalytic process Ethanol Lignocellulosic biomass Minimum ethanol selling price |
topic |
ddc 660 ddc 570 ssgn 12 misc Techno-economic misc Chemocatalytic process misc Ethanol misc Lignocellulosic biomass misc Minimum ethanol selling price |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 660 ddc 570 ssgn 12 misc Techno-economic misc Chemocatalytic process misc Ethanol misc Lignocellulosic biomass misc Minimum ethanol selling price |
topic_browse |
ddc 660 ddc 570 ssgn 12 misc Techno-economic misc Chemocatalytic process misc Ethanol misc Lignocellulosic biomass misc Minimum ethanol selling price |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Bioprocess and biosystems engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
333469763 |
dewey-tens |
660 - Chemical engineering 570 - Life sciences; biology 690 - Building & construction 540 - Chemistry |
hierarchy_top_title |
Bioprocess and biosystems engineering |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)333469763 (DE-600)2056063-1 (DE-576)094533709 |
title |
Techno-economic analysis of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass–a comparison of fermentation, thermo catalytic, and chemocatalytic technologies |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2125659409 (DE-He213)s00449-020-02504-4-p |
title_full |
Techno-economic analysis of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass–a comparison of fermentation, thermo catalytic, and chemocatalytic technologies |
author_sort |
Devi, Asha |
journal |
Bioprocess and biosystems engineering |
journalStr |
Bioprocess and biosystems engineering |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 500 - Science |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2021 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
1093 |
author_browse |
Devi, Asha Niazi, Ambreen Ramteke, Manojkumar Upadhyayula, Sreedevi |
container_volume |
44 |
class |
660 VZ 570 690 540 VZ 12 ssgn |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Devi, Asha |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s00449-020-02504-4 |
dewey-full |
660 570 690 540 |
title_sort |
techno-economic analysis of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass–a comparison of fermentation, thermo catalytic, and chemocatalytic technologies |
title_auth |
Techno-economic analysis of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass–a comparison of fermentation, thermo catalytic, and chemocatalytic technologies |
abstract |
Bioethanol produced from 2nd generation biomass comprising of agricultural residues and forest wastes is a viable alternate fuel. Besides fermentation and biomass gasification to syngas and its further conversion to ethanol, a direct chemocatalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into ethanol is being investigated as a viable route which avoids the emission of greenhouse gases. In this work, a detailed configuration of chemocatalytic route is simulated and optimized for minimizing the cost of ethanol production. The economic feasibility of ethanol production through the chemocatalytic pathway is analyzed. The techno-economic analysis is conducted in terms of ethanol selectivity and ethanol production cost. The obtained results show that biomass feedstock and catalyst have major contributions to the production cost. The proposed route is found to be giving a lower ethanol selling price as compared to the well-researched routes of biomass fermentation to ethanol and biomass gasification followed by syngas conversion to ethanol. Graphic abstract © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021 |
abstractGer |
Bioethanol produced from 2nd generation biomass comprising of agricultural residues and forest wastes is a viable alternate fuel. Besides fermentation and biomass gasification to syngas and its further conversion to ethanol, a direct chemocatalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into ethanol is being investigated as a viable route which avoids the emission of greenhouse gases. In this work, a detailed configuration of chemocatalytic route is simulated and optimized for minimizing the cost of ethanol production. The economic feasibility of ethanol production through the chemocatalytic pathway is analyzed. The techno-economic analysis is conducted in terms of ethanol selectivity and ethanol production cost. The obtained results show that biomass feedstock and catalyst have major contributions to the production cost. The proposed route is found to be giving a lower ethanol selling price as compared to the well-researched routes of biomass fermentation to ethanol and biomass gasification followed by syngas conversion to ethanol. Graphic abstract © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Bioethanol produced from 2nd generation biomass comprising of agricultural residues and forest wastes is a viable alternate fuel. Besides fermentation and biomass gasification to syngas and its further conversion to ethanol, a direct chemocatalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into ethanol is being investigated as a viable route which avoids the emission of greenhouse gases. In this work, a detailed configuration of chemocatalytic route is simulated and optimized for minimizing the cost of ethanol production. The economic feasibility of ethanol production through the chemocatalytic pathway is analyzed. The techno-economic analysis is conducted in terms of ethanol selectivity and ethanol production cost. The obtained results show that biomass feedstock and catalyst have major contributions to the production cost. The proposed route is found to be giving a lower ethanol selling price as compared to the well-researched routes of biomass fermentation to ethanol and biomass gasification followed by syngas conversion to ethanol. Graphic abstract © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4277 |
container_issue |
6 |
title_short |
Techno-economic analysis of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass–a comparison of fermentation, thermo catalytic, and chemocatalytic technologies |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-020-02504-4 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Niazi, Ambreen Ramteke, Manojkumar Upadhyayula, Sreedevi |
author2Str |
Niazi, Ambreen Ramteke, Manojkumar Upadhyayula, Sreedevi |
ppnlink |
333469763 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s00449-020-02504-4 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T04:27:05.595Z |
_version_ |
1803621211142356992 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2125659409</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230505104313.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2021 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00449-020-02504-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2125659409</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s00449-020-02504-4-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Devi, Asha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Techno-economic analysis of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass–a comparison of fermentation, thermo catalytic, and chemocatalytic technologies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bioethanol produced from 2nd generation biomass comprising of agricultural residues and forest wastes is a viable alternate fuel. Besides fermentation and biomass gasification to syngas and its further conversion to ethanol, a direct chemocatalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into ethanol is being investigated as a viable route which avoids the emission of greenhouse gases. In this work, a detailed configuration of chemocatalytic route is simulated and optimized for minimizing the cost of ethanol production. The economic feasibility of ethanol production through the chemocatalytic pathway is analyzed. The techno-economic analysis is conducted in terms of ethanol selectivity and ethanol production cost. The obtained results show that biomass feedstock and catalyst have major contributions to the production cost. The proposed route is found to be giving a lower ethanol selling price as compared to the well-researched routes of biomass fermentation to ethanol and biomass gasification followed by syngas conversion to ethanol. Graphic abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Techno-economic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Chemocatalytic process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethanol</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lignocellulosic biomass</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Minimum ethanol selling price</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Niazi, Ambreen</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ramteke, Manojkumar</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Upadhyayula, Sreedevi</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bioprocess and biosystems engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">44(2021), 6 vom: 04. Feb., Seite 1093-1107</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)333469763</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2056063-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)094533709</subfield><subfield code="x">1615-7591</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:44</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:04</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1093-1107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-020-02504-4</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">44</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="b">04</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">1093-1107</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399295 |