Isolating Patterns in Open Reaction–Diffusion Systems
Abstract Realistic examples of reaction–diffusion phenomena governing spatial and spatiotemporal pattern formation are rarely isolated systems, either chemically or thermodynamically. However, even formulations of ‘open’ reaction–diffusion systems often neglect the role of domain boundaries. Most id...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Krause, Andrew L. [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2021 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2021 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Bulletin of mathematical biology - Springer US, 1973, 83(2021), 7 vom: 04. Juni |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:83 ; year:2021 ; number:7 ; day:04 ; month:06 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11538-021-00913-4 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC2125895315 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2125895315 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230505113225.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 230505s2021 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11538-021-00913-4 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2125895315 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s11538-021-00913-4-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |a 510 |q VZ |
084 | |a 12 |2 ssgn | ||
084 | |a BIODIV |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
084 | |a 42.00 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Krause, Andrew L. |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0001-9638-7278 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Isolating Patterns in Open Reaction–Diffusion Systems |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © The Author(s) 2021 | ||
520 | |a Abstract Realistic examples of reaction–diffusion phenomena governing spatial and spatiotemporal pattern formation are rarely isolated systems, either chemically or thermodynamically. However, even formulations of ‘open’ reaction–diffusion systems often neglect the role of domain boundaries. Most idealizations of closed reaction–diffusion systems employ no-flux boundary conditions, and often patterns will form up to, or along, these boundaries. Motivated by boundaries of patterning fields related to the emergence of spatial form in embryonic development, we propose a set of mixed boundary conditions for a two-species reaction–diffusion system which forms inhomogeneous solutions away from the boundary of the domain for a variety of different reaction kinetics, with a prescribed uniform state near the boundary. We show that these boundary conditions can be derived from a larger heterogeneous field, indicating that these conditions can arise naturally if cell signalling or other properties of the medium vary in space. We explain the basic mechanisms behind this pattern localization and demonstrate that it can capture a large range of localized patterning in one, two, and three dimensions and that this framework can be applied to systems involving more than two species. Furthermore, the boundary conditions proposed lead to more symmetrical patterns on the interior of the domain and plausibly capture more realistic boundaries in developmental systems. Finally, we show that these isolated patterns are more robust to fluctuations in initial conditions and that they allow intriguing possibilities of pattern selection via geometry, distinct from known selection mechanisms. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Pattern formation | |
650 | 4 | |a Mixed boundary conditions | |
650 | 4 | |a Open reaction–diffusion systems | |
700 | 1 | |a Klika, Václav |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Maini, Philip K. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Headon, Denis |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gaffney, Eamonn A. |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bulletin of mathematical biology |d Springer US, 1973 |g 83(2021), 7 vom: 04. Juni |w (DE-627)129391719 |w (DE-600)184905-0 |w (DE-576)014776863 |x 0092-8240 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:83 |g year:2021 |g number:7 |g day:04 |g month:06 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-021-00913-4 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-MAT | ||
912 | |a SSG-OPC-MAT | ||
936 | b | k | |a 42.00 |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 83 |j 2021 |e 7 |b 04 |c 06 |
author_variant |
a l k al alk v k vk p k m pk pkm d h dh e a g ea eag |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:00928240:2021----::sltnptenioeratod |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
bklnumber |
42.00 |
publishDate |
2021 |
allfields |
10.1007/s11538-021-00913-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2125895315 (DE-He213)s11538-021-00913-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 510 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.00 bkl Krause, Andrew L. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9638-7278 aut Isolating Patterns in Open Reaction–Diffusion Systems 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Realistic examples of reaction–diffusion phenomena governing spatial and spatiotemporal pattern formation are rarely isolated systems, either chemically or thermodynamically. However, even formulations of ‘open’ reaction–diffusion systems often neglect the role of domain boundaries. Most idealizations of closed reaction–diffusion systems employ no-flux boundary conditions, and often patterns will form up to, or along, these boundaries. Motivated by boundaries of patterning fields related to the emergence of spatial form in embryonic development, we propose a set of mixed boundary conditions for a two-species reaction–diffusion system which forms inhomogeneous solutions away from the boundary of the domain for a variety of different reaction kinetics, with a prescribed uniform state near the boundary. We show that these boundary conditions can be derived from a larger heterogeneous field, indicating that these conditions can arise naturally if cell signalling or other properties of the medium vary in space. We explain the basic mechanisms behind this pattern localization and demonstrate that it can capture a large range of localized patterning in one, two, and three dimensions and that this framework can be applied to systems involving more than two species. Furthermore, the boundary conditions proposed lead to more symmetrical patterns on the interior of the domain and plausibly capture more realistic boundaries in developmental systems. Finally, we show that these isolated patterns are more robust to fluctuations in initial conditions and that they allow intriguing possibilities of pattern selection via geometry, distinct from known selection mechanisms. Pattern formation Mixed boundary conditions Open reaction–diffusion systems Klika, Václav aut Maini, Philip K. aut Headon, Denis aut Gaffney, Eamonn A. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of mathematical biology Springer US, 1973 83(2021), 7 vom: 04. Juni (DE-627)129391719 (DE-600)184905-0 (DE-576)014776863 0092-8240 nnns volume:83 year:2021 number:7 day:04 month:06 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-021-00913-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OPC-MAT 42.00 VZ AR 83 2021 7 04 06 |
spelling |
10.1007/s11538-021-00913-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2125895315 (DE-He213)s11538-021-00913-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 510 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.00 bkl Krause, Andrew L. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9638-7278 aut Isolating Patterns in Open Reaction–Diffusion Systems 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Realistic examples of reaction–diffusion phenomena governing spatial and spatiotemporal pattern formation are rarely isolated systems, either chemically or thermodynamically. However, even formulations of ‘open’ reaction–diffusion systems often neglect the role of domain boundaries. Most idealizations of closed reaction–diffusion systems employ no-flux boundary conditions, and often patterns will form up to, or along, these boundaries. Motivated by boundaries of patterning fields related to the emergence of spatial form in embryonic development, we propose a set of mixed boundary conditions for a two-species reaction–diffusion system which forms inhomogeneous solutions away from the boundary of the domain for a variety of different reaction kinetics, with a prescribed uniform state near the boundary. We show that these boundary conditions can be derived from a larger heterogeneous field, indicating that these conditions can arise naturally if cell signalling or other properties of the medium vary in space. We explain the basic mechanisms behind this pattern localization and demonstrate that it can capture a large range of localized patterning in one, two, and three dimensions and that this framework can be applied to systems involving more than two species. Furthermore, the boundary conditions proposed lead to more symmetrical patterns on the interior of the domain and plausibly capture more realistic boundaries in developmental systems. Finally, we show that these isolated patterns are more robust to fluctuations in initial conditions and that they allow intriguing possibilities of pattern selection via geometry, distinct from known selection mechanisms. Pattern formation Mixed boundary conditions Open reaction–diffusion systems Klika, Václav aut Maini, Philip K. aut Headon, Denis aut Gaffney, Eamonn A. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of mathematical biology Springer US, 1973 83(2021), 7 vom: 04. Juni (DE-627)129391719 (DE-600)184905-0 (DE-576)014776863 0092-8240 nnns volume:83 year:2021 number:7 day:04 month:06 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-021-00913-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OPC-MAT 42.00 VZ AR 83 2021 7 04 06 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11538-021-00913-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2125895315 (DE-He213)s11538-021-00913-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 510 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.00 bkl Krause, Andrew L. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9638-7278 aut Isolating Patterns in Open Reaction–Diffusion Systems 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Realistic examples of reaction–diffusion phenomena governing spatial and spatiotemporal pattern formation are rarely isolated systems, either chemically or thermodynamically. However, even formulations of ‘open’ reaction–diffusion systems often neglect the role of domain boundaries. Most idealizations of closed reaction–diffusion systems employ no-flux boundary conditions, and often patterns will form up to, or along, these boundaries. Motivated by boundaries of patterning fields related to the emergence of spatial form in embryonic development, we propose a set of mixed boundary conditions for a two-species reaction–diffusion system which forms inhomogeneous solutions away from the boundary of the domain for a variety of different reaction kinetics, with a prescribed uniform state near the boundary. We show that these boundary conditions can be derived from a larger heterogeneous field, indicating that these conditions can arise naturally if cell signalling or other properties of the medium vary in space. We explain the basic mechanisms behind this pattern localization and demonstrate that it can capture a large range of localized patterning in one, two, and three dimensions and that this framework can be applied to systems involving more than two species. Furthermore, the boundary conditions proposed lead to more symmetrical patterns on the interior of the domain and plausibly capture more realistic boundaries in developmental systems. Finally, we show that these isolated patterns are more robust to fluctuations in initial conditions and that they allow intriguing possibilities of pattern selection via geometry, distinct from known selection mechanisms. Pattern formation Mixed boundary conditions Open reaction–diffusion systems Klika, Václav aut Maini, Philip K. aut Headon, Denis aut Gaffney, Eamonn A. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of mathematical biology Springer US, 1973 83(2021), 7 vom: 04. Juni (DE-627)129391719 (DE-600)184905-0 (DE-576)014776863 0092-8240 nnns volume:83 year:2021 number:7 day:04 month:06 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-021-00913-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OPC-MAT 42.00 VZ AR 83 2021 7 04 06 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11538-021-00913-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2125895315 (DE-He213)s11538-021-00913-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 510 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.00 bkl Krause, Andrew L. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9638-7278 aut Isolating Patterns in Open Reaction–Diffusion Systems 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Realistic examples of reaction–diffusion phenomena governing spatial and spatiotemporal pattern formation are rarely isolated systems, either chemically or thermodynamically. However, even formulations of ‘open’ reaction–diffusion systems often neglect the role of domain boundaries. Most idealizations of closed reaction–diffusion systems employ no-flux boundary conditions, and often patterns will form up to, or along, these boundaries. Motivated by boundaries of patterning fields related to the emergence of spatial form in embryonic development, we propose a set of mixed boundary conditions for a two-species reaction–diffusion system which forms inhomogeneous solutions away from the boundary of the domain for a variety of different reaction kinetics, with a prescribed uniform state near the boundary. We show that these boundary conditions can be derived from a larger heterogeneous field, indicating that these conditions can arise naturally if cell signalling or other properties of the medium vary in space. We explain the basic mechanisms behind this pattern localization and demonstrate that it can capture a large range of localized patterning in one, two, and three dimensions and that this framework can be applied to systems involving more than two species. Furthermore, the boundary conditions proposed lead to more symmetrical patterns on the interior of the domain and plausibly capture more realistic boundaries in developmental systems. Finally, we show that these isolated patterns are more robust to fluctuations in initial conditions and that they allow intriguing possibilities of pattern selection via geometry, distinct from known selection mechanisms. Pattern formation Mixed boundary conditions Open reaction–diffusion systems Klika, Václav aut Maini, Philip K. aut Headon, Denis aut Gaffney, Eamonn A. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of mathematical biology Springer US, 1973 83(2021), 7 vom: 04. Juni (DE-627)129391719 (DE-600)184905-0 (DE-576)014776863 0092-8240 nnns volume:83 year:2021 number:7 day:04 month:06 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-021-00913-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OPC-MAT 42.00 VZ AR 83 2021 7 04 06 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11538-021-00913-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2125895315 (DE-He213)s11538-021-00913-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 510 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.00 bkl Krause, Andrew L. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9638-7278 aut Isolating Patterns in Open Reaction–Diffusion Systems 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Realistic examples of reaction–diffusion phenomena governing spatial and spatiotemporal pattern formation are rarely isolated systems, either chemically or thermodynamically. However, even formulations of ‘open’ reaction–diffusion systems often neglect the role of domain boundaries. Most idealizations of closed reaction–diffusion systems employ no-flux boundary conditions, and often patterns will form up to, or along, these boundaries. Motivated by boundaries of patterning fields related to the emergence of spatial form in embryonic development, we propose a set of mixed boundary conditions for a two-species reaction–diffusion system which forms inhomogeneous solutions away from the boundary of the domain for a variety of different reaction kinetics, with a prescribed uniform state near the boundary. We show that these boundary conditions can be derived from a larger heterogeneous field, indicating that these conditions can arise naturally if cell signalling or other properties of the medium vary in space. We explain the basic mechanisms behind this pattern localization and demonstrate that it can capture a large range of localized patterning in one, two, and three dimensions and that this framework can be applied to systems involving more than two species. Furthermore, the boundary conditions proposed lead to more symmetrical patterns on the interior of the domain and plausibly capture more realistic boundaries in developmental systems. Finally, we show that these isolated patterns are more robust to fluctuations in initial conditions and that they allow intriguing possibilities of pattern selection via geometry, distinct from known selection mechanisms. Pattern formation Mixed boundary conditions Open reaction–diffusion systems Klika, Václav aut Maini, Philip K. aut Headon, Denis aut Gaffney, Eamonn A. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of mathematical biology Springer US, 1973 83(2021), 7 vom: 04. Juni (DE-627)129391719 (DE-600)184905-0 (DE-576)014776863 0092-8240 nnns volume:83 year:2021 number:7 day:04 month:06 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-021-00913-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OPC-MAT 42.00 VZ AR 83 2021 7 04 06 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Bulletin of mathematical biology 83(2021), 7 vom: 04. Juni volume:83 year:2021 number:7 day:04 month:06 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Bulletin of mathematical biology 83(2021), 7 vom: 04. Juni volume:83 year:2021 number:7 day:04 month:06 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Pattern formation Mixed boundary conditions Open reaction–diffusion systems |
dewey-raw |
570 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Bulletin of mathematical biology |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Krause, Andrew L. @@aut@@ Klika, Václav @@aut@@ Maini, Philip K. @@aut@@ Headon, Denis @@aut@@ Gaffney, Eamonn A. @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-06-04T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
129391719 |
dewey-sort |
3570 |
id |
OLC2125895315 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2125895315</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230505113225.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2021 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11538-021-00913-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2125895315</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11538-021-00913-4-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">510</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Krause, Andrew L.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-9638-7278</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Isolating Patterns in Open Reaction–Diffusion Systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Realistic examples of reaction–diffusion phenomena governing spatial and spatiotemporal pattern formation are rarely isolated systems, either chemically or thermodynamically. However, even formulations of ‘open’ reaction–diffusion systems often neglect the role of domain boundaries. Most idealizations of closed reaction–diffusion systems employ no-flux boundary conditions, and often patterns will form up to, or along, these boundaries. Motivated by boundaries of patterning fields related to the emergence of spatial form in embryonic development, we propose a set of mixed boundary conditions for a two-species reaction–diffusion system which forms inhomogeneous solutions away from the boundary of the domain for a variety of different reaction kinetics, with a prescribed uniform state near the boundary. We show that these boundary conditions can be derived from a larger heterogeneous field, indicating that these conditions can arise naturally if cell signalling or other properties of the medium vary in space. We explain the basic mechanisms behind this pattern localization and demonstrate that it can capture a large range of localized patterning in one, two, and three dimensions and that this framework can be applied to systems involving more than two species. Furthermore, the boundary conditions proposed lead to more symmetrical patterns on the interior of the domain and plausibly capture more realistic boundaries in developmental systems. Finally, we show that these isolated patterns are more robust to fluctuations in initial conditions and that they allow intriguing possibilities of pattern selection via geometry, distinct from known selection mechanisms.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pattern formation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mixed boundary conditions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Open reaction–diffusion systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Klika, Václav</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maini, Philip K.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Headon, Denis</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gaffney, Eamonn A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bulletin of mathematical biology</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">83(2021), 7 vom: 04. Juni</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129391719</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)184905-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014776863</subfield><subfield code="x">0092-8240</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:83</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">day:04</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-021-00913-4</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.00</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">83</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="b">04</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Krause, Andrew L. |
spellingShingle |
Krause, Andrew L. ddc 570 ssgn 12 fid BIODIV bkl 42.00 misc Pattern formation misc Mixed boundary conditions misc Open reaction–diffusion systems Isolating Patterns in Open Reaction–Diffusion Systems |
authorStr |
Krause, Andrew L. |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129391719 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
570 - Life sciences; biology 510 - Mathematics |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0092-8240 |
topic_title |
570 510 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.00 bkl Isolating Patterns in Open Reaction–Diffusion Systems Pattern formation Mixed boundary conditions Open reaction–diffusion systems |
topic |
ddc 570 ssgn 12 fid BIODIV bkl 42.00 misc Pattern formation misc Mixed boundary conditions misc Open reaction–diffusion systems |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 570 ssgn 12 fid BIODIV bkl 42.00 misc Pattern formation misc Mixed boundary conditions misc Open reaction–diffusion systems |
topic_browse |
ddc 570 ssgn 12 fid BIODIV bkl 42.00 misc Pattern formation misc Mixed boundary conditions misc Open reaction–diffusion systems |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Bulletin of mathematical biology |
hierarchy_parent_id |
129391719 |
dewey-tens |
570 - Life sciences; biology 510 - Mathematics |
hierarchy_top_title |
Bulletin of mathematical biology |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129391719 (DE-600)184905-0 (DE-576)014776863 |
title |
Isolating Patterns in Open Reaction–Diffusion Systems |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2125895315 (DE-He213)s11538-021-00913-4-p |
title_full |
Isolating Patterns in Open Reaction–Diffusion Systems |
author_sort |
Krause, Andrew L. |
journal |
Bulletin of mathematical biology |
journalStr |
Bulletin of mathematical biology |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2021 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Krause, Andrew L. Klika, Václav Maini, Philip K. Headon, Denis Gaffney, Eamonn A. |
container_volume |
83 |
class |
570 510 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.00 bkl |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Krause, Andrew L. |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11538-021-00913-4 |
normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0001-9638-7278 |
normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0001-9638-7278 |
dewey-full |
570 510 |
title_sort |
isolating patterns in open reaction–diffusion systems |
title_auth |
Isolating Patterns in Open Reaction–Diffusion Systems |
abstract |
Abstract Realistic examples of reaction–diffusion phenomena governing spatial and spatiotemporal pattern formation are rarely isolated systems, either chemically or thermodynamically. However, even formulations of ‘open’ reaction–diffusion systems often neglect the role of domain boundaries. Most idealizations of closed reaction–diffusion systems employ no-flux boundary conditions, and often patterns will form up to, or along, these boundaries. Motivated by boundaries of patterning fields related to the emergence of spatial form in embryonic development, we propose a set of mixed boundary conditions for a two-species reaction–diffusion system which forms inhomogeneous solutions away from the boundary of the domain for a variety of different reaction kinetics, with a prescribed uniform state near the boundary. We show that these boundary conditions can be derived from a larger heterogeneous field, indicating that these conditions can arise naturally if cell signalling or other properties of the medium vary in space. We explain the basic mechanisms behind this pattern localization and demonstrate that it can capture a large range of localized patterning in one, two, and three dimensions and that this framework can be applied to systems involving more than two species. Furthermore, the boundary conditions proposed lead to more symmetrical patterns on the interior of the domain and plausibly capture more realistic boundaries in developmental systems. Finally, we show that these isolated patterns are more robust to fluctuations in initial conditions and that they allow intriguing possibilities of pattern selection via geometry, distinct from known selection mechanisms. © The Author(s) 2021 |
abstractGer |
Abstract Realistic examples of reaction–diffusion phenomena governing spatial and spatiotemporal pattern formation are rarely isolated systems, either chemically or thermodynamically. However, even formulations of ‘open’ reaction–diffusion systems often neglect the role of domain boundaries. Most idealizations of closed reaction–diffusion systems employ no-flux boundary conditions, and often patterns will form up to, or along, these boundaries. Motivated by boundaries of patterning fields related to the emergence of spatial form in embryonic development, we propose a set of mixed boundary conditions for a two-species reaction–diffusion system which forms inhomogeneous solutions away from the boundary of the domain for a variety of different reaction kinetics, with a prescribed uniform state near the boundary. We show that these boundary conditions can be derived from a larger heterogeneous field, indicating that these conditions can arise naturally if cell signalling or other properties of the medium vary in space. We explain the basic mechanisms behind this pattern localization and demonstrate that it can capture a large range of localized patterning in one, two, and three dimensions and that this framework can be applied to systems involving more than two species. Furthermore, the boundary conditions proposed lead to more symmetrical patterns on the interior of the domain and plausibly capture more realistic boundaries in developmental systems. Finally, we show that these isolated patterns are more robust to fluctuations in initial conditions and that they allow intriguing possibilities of pattern selection via geometry, distinct from known selection mechanisms. © The Author(s) 2021 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Realistic examples of reaction–diffusion phenomena governing spatial and spatiotemporal pattern formation are rarely isolated systems, either chemically or thermodynamically. However, even formulations of ‘open’ reaction–diffusion systems often neglect the role of domain boundaries. Most idealizations of closed reaction–diffusion systems employ no-flux boundary conditions, and often patterns will form up to, or along, these boundaries. Motivated by boundaries of patterning fields related to the emergence of spatial form in embryonic development, we propose a set of mixed boundary conditions for a two-species reaction–diffusion system which forms inhomogeneous solutions away from the boundary of the domain for a variety of different reaction kinetics, with a prescribed uniform state near the boundary. We show that these boundary conditions can be derived from a larger heterogeneous field, indicating that these conditions can arise naturally if cell signalling or other properties of the medium vary in space. We explain the basic mechanisms behind this pattern localization and demonstrate that it can capture a large range of localized patterning in one, two, and three dimensions and that this framework can be applied to systems involving more than two species. Furthermore, the boundary conditions proposed lead to more symmetrical patterns on the interior of the domain and plausibly capture more realistic boundaries in developmental systems. Finally, we show that these isolated patterns are more robust to fluctuations in initial conditions and that they allow intriguing possibilities of pattern selection via geometry, distinct from known selection mechanisms. © The Author(s) 2021 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OPC-MAT |
container_issue |
7 |
title_short |
Isolating Patterns in Open Reaction–Diffusion Systems |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-021-00913-4 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Klika, Václav Maini, Philip K. Headon, Denis Gaffney, Eamonn A. |
author2Str |
Klika, Václav Maini, Philip K. Headon, Denis Gaffney, Eamonn A. |
ppnlink |
129391719 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s11538-021-00913-4 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T05:14:53.913Z |
_version_ |
1803624218784432128 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2125895315</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230505113225.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2021 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11538-021-00913-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2125895315</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11538-021-00913-4-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">510</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Krause, Andrew L.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-9638-7278</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Isolating Patterns in Open Reaction–Diffusion Systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Realistic examples of reaction–diffusion phenomena governing spatial and spatiotemporal pattern formation are rarely isolated systems, either chemically or thermodynamically. However, even formulations of ‘open’ reaction–diffusion systems often neglect the role of domain boundaries. Most idealizations of closed reaction–diffusion systems employ no-flux boundary conditions, and often patterns will form up to, or along, these boundaries. Motivated by boundaries of patterning fields related to the emergence of spatial form in embryonic development, we propose a set of mixed boundary conditions for a two-species reaction–diffusion system which forms inhomogeneous solutions away from the boundary of the domain for a variety of different reaction kinetics, with a prescribed uniform state near the boundary. We show that these boundary conditions can be derived from a larger heterogeneous field, indicating that these conditions can arise naturally if cell signalling or other properties of the medium vary in space. We explain the basic mechanisms behind this pattern localization and demonstrate that it can capture a large range of localized patterning in one, two, and three dimensions and that this framework can be applied to systems involving more than two species. Furthermore, the boundary conditions proposed lead to more symmetrical patterns on the interior of the domain and plausibly capture more realistic boundaries in developmental systems. Finally, we show that these isolated patterns are more robust to fluctuations in initial conditions and that they allow intriguing possibilities of pattern selection via geometry, distinct from known selection mechanisms.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pattern formation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mixed boundary conditions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Open reaction–diffusion systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Klika, Václav</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maini, Philip K.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Headon, Denis</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gaffney, Eamonn A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bulletin of mathematical biology</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">83(2021), 7 vom: 04. Juni</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129391719</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)184905-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014776863</subfield><subfield code="x">0092-8240</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:83</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">day:04</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-021-00913-4</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.00</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">83</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="b">04</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4018154 |