Choice experiments to elicit the users’ preferences for coastal erosion management: the case of Praia da Amorosa
Abstract Coastal erosion is a complex and increasingly important problem, largely due to its effects and management strategies. The current context of climate change, together with centuries of human occupation of shorelines, adds pressure for the development of sustainable coastal management polici...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Oliveira, Susana [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Nature B.V. 2020 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Environment, development and sustainability - Springer Netherlands, 1999, 23(2020), 7 vom: 15. Mai, Seite 9749-9765 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:23 ; year:2020 ; number:7 ; day:15 ; month:05 ; pages:9749-9765 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2126107124 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2126107124 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230505112007.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 230505s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2126107124 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10668-020-00768-0-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 333.7 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Oliveira, Susana |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0003-1081-5732 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Choice experiments to elicit the users’ preferences for coastal erosion management: the case of Praia da Amorosa |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Coastal erosion is a complex and increasingly important problem, largely due to its effects and management strategies. The current context of climate change, together with centuries of human occupation of shorelines, adds pressure for the development of sustainable coastal management policies, the success of which crucially depends on the consideration of all stakeholders’ perspectives. This research investigates users’ preferences over alternative options of coastal erosion management. Through the implementation of a discrete choice experiment, respondents’ preferences regarding management alternatives are elicited, and their willingness to pay for alternatives’ attributes is estimated. The results show that respondents prefer some interventions to mitigate the problem rather than no action, and prefer lighter intervention (palisades, gangways) to heavy infrastructures (rockfills, seawalls, groynes). Moreover, the results show the presence of preference heterogeneity and thus the need to use more flexible and complex models. Based on the results obtained, it is possible to drive some policy implications. First, the do-nothing option is not viable from the population’s standpoint; second, although some type of coastal erosion protection is demanded by the general population, the preferred approach is for light forms, contrary to the policy adopted in the last century, and still overwhelmingly present in the territory. Lastly, given the considerable heterogeneity in respondents’ preferences, careful consideration of the welfare impact of coastal interventions by population segments is required. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Environmental valuation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Choice experiments | |
| 650 | 4 | |a GMNL | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Preference heterogeneity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Coastal erosion management | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pinto, Lígia M. Costa |0 (orcid)0000-0001-7089-2663 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Environment, development and sustainability |d Springer Netherlands, 1999 |g 23(2020), 7 vom: 15. Mai, Seite 9749-9765 |w (DE-627)247370592 |w (DE-600)1438730-X |w (DE-576)27365103X |x 1387-585X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:23 |g year:2020 |g number:7 |g day:15 |g month:05 |g pages:9749-9765 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-GGO | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-FOR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines |q VZ |0 106413708 |0 (DE-625)106413708 |
| 936 | b | k | |a 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines |q VZ |0 106413708 |0 (DE-625)106413708 |
| 936 | b | k | |a 83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie |q VZ |0 106414925 |0 (DE-625)106414925 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 23 |j 2020 |e 7 |b 15 |c 05 |h 9749-9765 | ||
| author_variant |
s o so l m c p lmc lmcp |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:1387585X:2020----::hiexeietteiitesrpeeecsocatlrsomngm |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| bklnumber |
74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines 83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0 doi (DE-627)OLC2126107124 (DE-He213)s10668-020-00768-0-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 VZ 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie bkl Oliveira, Susana verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1081-5732 aut Choice experiments to elicit the users’ preferences for coastal erosion management: the case of Praia da Amorosa 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract Coastal erosion is a complex and increasingly important problem, largely due to its effects and management strategies. The current context of climate change, together with centuries of human occupation of shorelines, adds pressure for the development of sustainable coastal management policies, the success of which crucially depends on the consideration of all stakeholders’ perspectives. This research investigates users’ preferences over alternative options of coastal erosion management. Through the implementation of a discrete choice experiment, respondents’ preferences regarding management alternatives are elicited, and their willingness to pay for alternatives’ attributes is estimated. The results show that respondents prefer some interventions to mitigate the problem rather than no action, and prefer lighter intervention (palisades, gangways) to heavy infrastructures (rockfills, seawalls, groynes). Moreover, the results show the presence of preference heterogeneity and thus the need to use more flexible and complex models. Based on the results obtained, it is possible to drive some policy implications. First, the do-nothing option is not viable from the population’s standpoint; second, although some type of coastal erosion protection is demanded by the general population, the preferred approach is for light forms, contrary to the policy adopted in the last century, and still overwhelmingly present in the territory. Lastly, given the considerable heterogeneity in respondents’ preferences, careful consideration of the welfare impact of coastal interventions by population segments is required. Environmental valuation Choice experiments GMNL Preference heterogeneity Coastal erosion management Pinto, Lígia M. Costa (orcid)0000-0001-7089-2663 aut Enthalten in Environment, development and sustainability Springer Netherlands, 1999 23(2020), 7 vom: 15. Mai, Seite 9749-9765 (DE-627)247370592 (DE-600)1438730-X (DE-576)27365103X 1387-585X nnns volume:23 year:2020 number:7 day:15 month:05 pages:9749-9765 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-GGO SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-FOR GBV_ILN_26 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines VZ 106413708 (DE-625)106413708 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines VZ 106413708 (DE-625)106413708 83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie VZ 106414925 (DE-625)106414925 AR 23 2020 7 15 05 9749-9765 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0 doi (DE-627)OLC2126107124 (DE-He213)s10668-020-00768-0-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 VZ 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie bkl Oliveira, Susana verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1081-5732 aut Choice experiments to elicit the users’ preferences for coastal erosion management: the case of Praia da Amorosa 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract Coastal erosion is a complex and increasingly important problem, largely due to its effects and management strategies. The current context of climate change, together with centuries of human occupation of shorelines, adds pressure for the development of sustainable coastal management policies, the success of which crucially depends on the consideration of all stakeholders’ perspectives. This research investigates users’ preferences over alternative options of coastal erosion management. Through the implementation of a discrete choice experiment, respondents’ preferences regarding management alternatives are elicited, and their willingness to pay for alternatives’ attributes is estimated. The results show that respondents prefer some interventions to mitigate the problem rather than no action, and prefer lighter intervention (palisades, gangways) to heavy infrastructures (rockfills, seawalls, groynes). Moreover, the results show the presence of preference heterogeneity and thus the need to use more flexible and complex models. Based on the results obtained, it is possible to drive some policy implications. First, the do-nothing option is not viable from the population’s standpoint; second, although some type of coastal erosion protection is demanded by the general population, the preferred approach is for light forms, contrary to the policy adopted in the last century, and still overwhelmingly present in the territory. Lastly, given the considerable heterogeneity in respondents’ preferences, careful consideration of the welfare impact of coastal interventions by population segments is required. Environmental valuation Choice experiments GMNL Preference heterogeneity Coastal erosion management Pinto, Lígia M. Costa (orcid)0000-0001-7089-2663 aut Enthalten in Environment, development and sustainability Springer Netherlands, 1999 23(2020), 7 vom: 15. Mai, Seite 9749-9765 (DE-627)247370592 (DE-600)1438730-X (DE-576)27365103X 1387-585X nnns volume:23 year:2020 number:7 day:15 month:05 pages:9749-9765 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-GGO SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-FOR GBV_ILN_26 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines VZ 106413708 (DE-625)106413708 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines VZ 106413708 (DE-625)106413708 83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie VZ 106414925 (DE-625)106414925 AR 23 2020 7 15 05 9749-9765 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0 doi (DE-627)OLC2126107124 (DE-He213)s10668-020-00768-0-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 VZ 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie bkl Oliveira, Susana verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1081-5732 aut Choice experiments to elicit the users’ preferences for coastal erosion management: the case of Praia da Amorosa 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract Coastal erosion is a complex and increasingly important problem, largely due to its effects and management strategies. The current context of climate change, together with centuries of human occupation of shorelines, adds pressure for the development of sustainable coastal management policies, the success of which crucially depends on the consideration of all stakeholders’ perspectives. This research investigates users’ preferences over alternative options of coastal erosion management. Through the implementation of a discrete choice experiment, respondents’ preferences regarding management alternatives are elicited, and their willingness to pay for alternatives’ attributes is estimated. The results show that respondents prefer some interventions to mitigate the problem rather than no action, and prefer lighter intervention (palisades, gangways) to heavy infrastructures (rockfills, seawalls, groynes). Moreover, the results show the presence of preference heterogeneity and thus the need to use more flexible and complex models. Based on the results obtained, it is possible to drive some policy implications. First, the do-nothing option is not viable from the population’s standpoint; second, although some type of coastal erosion protection is demanded by the general population, the preferred approach is for light forms, contrary to the policy adopted in the last century, and still overwhelmingly present in the territory. Lastly, given the considerable heterogeneity in respondents’ preferences, careful consideration of the welfare impact of coastal interventions by population segments is required. Environmental valuation Choice experiments GMNL Preference heterogeneity Coastal erosion management Pinto, Lígia M. Costa (orcid)0000-0001-7089-2663 aut Enthalten in Environment, development and sustainability Springer Netherlands, 1999 23(2020), 7 vom: 15. Mai, Seite 9749-9765 (DE-627)247370592 (DE-600)1438730-X (DE-576)27365103X 1387-585X nnns volume:23 year:2020 number:7 day:15 month:05 pages:9749-9765 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-GGO SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-FOR GBV_ILN_26 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines VZ 106413708 (DE-625)106413708 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines VZ 106413708 (DE-625)106413708 83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie VZ 106414925 (DE-625)106414925 AR 23 2020 7 15 05 9749-9765 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0 doi (DE-627)OLC2126107124 (DE-He213)s10668-020-00768-0-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 VZ 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie bkl Oliveira, Susana verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1081-5732 aut Choice experiments to elicit the users’ preferences for coastal erosion management: the case of Praia da Amorosa 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract Coastal erosion is a complex and increasingly important problem, largely due to its effects and management strategies. The current context of climate change, together with centuries of human occupation of shorelines, adds pressure for the development of sustainable coastal management policies, the success of which crucially depends on the consideration of all stakeholders’ perspectives. This research investigates users’ preferences over alternative options of coastal erosion management. Through the implementation of a discrete choice experiment, respondents’ preferences regarding management alternatives are elicited, and their willingness to pay for alternatives’ attributes is estimated. The results show that respondents prefer some interventions to mitigate the problem rather than no action, and prefer lighter intervention (palisades, gangways) to heavy infrastructures (rockfills, seawalls, groynes). Moreover, the results show the presence of preference heterogeneity and thus the need to use more flexible and complex models. Based on the results obtained, it is possible to drive some policy implications. First, the do-nothing option is not viable from the population’s standpoint; second, although some type of coastal erosion protection is demanded by the general population, the preferred approach is for light forms, contrary to the policy adopted in the last century, and still overwhelmingly present in the territory. Lastly, given the considerable heterogeneity in respondents’ preferences, careful consideration of the welfare impact of coastal interventions by population segments is required. Environmental valuation Choice experiments GMNL Preference heterogeneity Coastal erosion management Pinto, Lígia M. Costa (orcid)0000-0001-7089-2663 aut Enthalten in Environment, development and sustainability Springer Netherlands, 1999 23(2020), 7 vom: 15. Mai, Seite 9749-9765 (DE-627)247370592 (DE-600)1438730-X (DE-576)27365103X 1387-585X nnns volume:23 year:2020 number:7 day:15 month:05 pages:9749-9765 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-GGO SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-FOR GBV_ILN_26 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines VZ 106413708 (DE-625)106413708 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines VZ 106413708 (DE-625)106413708 83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie VZ 106414925 (DE-625)106414925 AR 23 2020 7 15 05 9749-9765 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0 doi (DE-627)OLC2126107124 (DE-He213)s10668-020-00768-0-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 VZ 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie bkl Oliveira, Susana verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1081-5732 aut Choice experiments to elicit the users’ preferences for coastal erosion management: the case of Praia da Amorosa 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract Coastal erosion is a complex and increasingly important problem, largely due to its effects and management strategies. The current context of climate change, together with centuries of human occupation of shorelines, adds pressure for the development of sustainable coastal management policies, the success of which crucially depends on the consideration of all stakeholders’ perspectives. This research investigates users’ preferences over alternative options of coastal erosion management. Through the implementation of a discrete choice experiment, respondents’ preferences regarding management alternatives are elicited, and their willingness to pay for alternatives’ attributes is estimated. The results show that respondents prefer some interventions to mitigate the problem rather than no action, and prefer lighter intervention (palisades, gangways) to heavy infrastructures (rockfills, seawalls, groynes). Moreover, the results show the presence of preference heterogeneity and thus the need to use more flexible and complex models. Based on the results obtained, it is possible to drive some policy implications. First, the do-nothing option is not viable from the population’s standpoint; second, although some type of coastal erosion protection is demanded by the general population, the preferred approach is for light forms, contrary to the policy adopted in the last century, and still overwhelmingly present in the territory. Lastly, given the considerable heterogeneity in respondents’ preferences, careful consideration of the welfare impact of coastal interventions by population segments is required. Environmental valuation Choice experiments GMNL Preference heterogeneity Coastal erosion management Pinto, Lígia M. Costa (orcid)0000-0001-7089-2663 aut Enthalten in Environment, development and sustainability Springer Netherlands, 1999 23(2020), 7 vom: 15. Mai, Seite 9749-9765 (DE-627)247370592 (DE-600)1438730-X (DE-576)27365103X 1387-585X nnns volume:23 year:2020 number:7 day:15 month:05 pages:9749-9765 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-GGO SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-FOR GBV_ILN_26 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines VZ 106413708 (DE-625)106413708 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines VZ 106413708 (DE-625)106413708 83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie VZ 106414925 (DE-625)106414925 AR 23 2020 7 15 05 9749-9765 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Environment, development and sustainability 23(2020), 7 vom: 15. Mai, Seite 9749-9765 volume:23 year:2020 number:7 day:15 month:05 pages:9749-9765 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Environment, development and sustainability 23(2020), 7 vom: 15. Mai, Seite 9749-9765 volume:23 year:2020 number:7 day:15 month:05 pages:9749-9765 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Environmental valuation Choice experiments GMNL Preference heterogeneity Coastal erosion management |
| dewey-raw |
333.7 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Environment, development and sustainability |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Oliveira, Susana @@aut@@ Pinto, Lígia M. Costa @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-05-15T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
247370592 |
| dewey-sort |
3333.7 |
| id |
OLC2126107124 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2126107124</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230505112007.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2126107124</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10668-020-00768-0-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oliveira, Susana</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-1081-5732</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Choice experiments to elicit the users’ preferences for coastal erosion management: the case of Praia da Amorosa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Nature B.V. 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Coastal erosion is a complex and increasingly important problem, largely due to its effects and management strategies. The current context of climate change, together with centuries of human occupation of shorelines, adds pressure for the development of sustainable coastal management policies, the success of which crucially depends on the consideration of all stakeholders’ perspectives. This research investigates users’ preferences over alternative options of coastal erosion management. Through the implementation of a discrete choice experiment, respondents’ preferences regarding management alternatives are elicited, and their willingness to pay for alternatives’ attributes is estimated. The results show that respondents prefer some interventions to mitigate the problem rather than no action, and prefer lighter intervention (palisades, gangways) to heavy infrastructures (rockfills, seawalls, groynes). Moreover, the results show the presence of preference heterogeneity and thus the need to use more flexible and complex models. Based on the results obtained, it is possible to drive some policy implications. First, the do-nothing option is not viable from the population’s standpoint; second, although some type of coastal erosion protection is demanded by the general population, the preferred approach is for light forms, contrary to the policy adopted in the last century, and still overwhelmingly present in the territory. Lastly, given the considerable heterogeneity in respondents’ preferences, careful consideration of the welfare impact of coastal interventions by population segments is required.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environmental valuation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Choice experiments</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">GMNL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Preference heterogeneity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Coastal erosion management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pinto, Lígia M. Costa</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-7089-2663</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Environment, development and sustainability</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1999</subfield><subfield code="g">23(2020), 7 vom: 15. Mai, Seite 9749-9765</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)247370592</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1438730-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)27365103X</subfield><subfield code="x">1387-585X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:23</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:9749-9765</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="0">106413708</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)106413708</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="0">106413708</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)106413708</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="0">106414925</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)106414925</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">23</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">9749-9765</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Oliveira, Susana |
| spellingShingle |
Oliveira, Susana ddc 333.7 bkl 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie misc Environmental valuation misc Choice experiments misc GMNL misc Preference heterogeneity misc Coastal erosion management Choice experiments to elicit the users’ preferences for coastal erosion management: the case of Praia da Amorosa |
| authorStr |
Oliveira, Susana |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)247370592 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
333 - Economics of land & energy |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1387-585X |
| topic_title |
333.7 VZ 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie bkl Choice experiments to elicit the users’ preferences for coastal erosion management: the case of Praia da Amorosa Environmental valuation Choice experiments GMNL Preference heterogeneity Coastal erosion management |
| topic |
ddc 333.7 bkl 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie misc Environmental valuation misc Choice experiments misc GMNL misc Preference heterogeneity misc Coastal erosion management |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 333.7 bkl 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie misc Environmental valuation misc Choice experiments misc GMNL misc Preference heterogeneity misc Coastal erosion management |
| topic_browse |
ddc 333.7 bkl 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie misc Environmental valuation misc Choice experiments misc GMNL misc Preference heterogeneity misc Coastal erosion management |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Environment, development and sustainability |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
247370592 |
| dewey-tens |
330 - Economics |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Environment, development and sustainability |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)247370592 (DE-600)1438730-X (DE-576)27365103X |
| title |
Choice experiments to elicit the users’ preferences for coastal erosion management: the case of Praia da Amorosa |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2126107124 (DE-He213)s10668-020-00768-0-p |
| title_full |
Choice experiments to elicit the users’ preferences for coastal erosion management: the case of Praia da Amorosa |
| author_sort |
Oliveira, Susana |
| journal |
Environment, development and sustainability |
| journalStr |
Environment, development and sustainability |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
9749 |
| author_browse |
Oliveira, Susana Pinto, Lígia M. Costa |
| container_volume |
23 |
| class |
333.7 VZ 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Oliveira, Susana |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0 |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0003-1081-5732 (ORCID)0000-0001-7089-2663 106413708 106414925 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0003-1081-5732 (orcid)0000-0001-7089-2663 106413708 (DE-625)106413708 106414925 (DE-625)106414925 |
| dewey-full |
333.7 |
| title_sort |
choice experiments to elicit the users’ preferences for coastal erosion management: the case of praia da amorosa |
| title_auth |
Choice experiments to elicit the users’ preferences for coastal erosion management: the case of Praia da Amorosa |
| abstract |
Abstract Coastal erosion is a complex and increasingly important problem, largely due to its effects and management strategies. The current context of climate change, together with centuries of human occupation of shorelines, adds pressure for the development of sustainable coastal management policies, the success of which crucially depends on the consideration of all stakeholders’ perspectives. This research investigates users’ preferences over alternative options of coastal erosion management. Through the implementation of a discrete choice experiment, respondents’ preferences regarding management alternatives are elicited, and their willingness to pay for alternatives’ attributes is estimated. The results show that respondents prefer some interventions to mitigate the problem rather than no action, and prefer lighter intervention (palisades, gangways) to heavy infrastructures (rockfills, seawalls, groynes). Moreover, the results show the presence of preference heterogeneity and thus the need to use more flexible and complex models. Based on the results obtained, it is possible to drive some policy implications. First, the do-nothing option is not viable from the population’s standpoint; second, although some type of coastal erosion protection is demanded by the general population, the preferred approach is for light forms, contrary to the policy adopted in the last century, and still overwhelmingly present in the territory. Lastly, given the considerable heterogeneity in respondents’ preferences, careful consideration of the welfare impact of coastal interventions by population segments is required. © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Coastal erosion is a complex and increasingly important problem, largely due to its effects and management strategies. The current context of climate change, together with centuries of human occupation of shorelines, adds pressure for the development of sustainable coastal management policies, the success of which crucially depends on the consideration of all stakeholders’ perspectives. This research investigates users’ preferences over alternative options of coastal erosion management. Through the implementation of a discrete choice experiment, respondents’ preferences regarding management alternatives are elicited, and their willingness to pay for alternatives’ attributes is estimated. The results show that respondents prefer some interventions to mitigate the problem rather than no action, and prefer lighter intervention (palisades, gangways) to heavy infrastructures (rockfills, seawalls, groynes). Moreover, the results show the presence of preference heterogeneity and thus the need to use more flexible and complex models. Based on the results obtained, it is possible to drive some policy implications. First, the do-nothing option is not viable from the population’s standpoint; second, although some type of coastal erosion protection is demanded by the general population, the preferred approach is for light forms, contrary to the policy adopted in the last century, and still overwhelmingly present in the territory. Lastly, given the considerable heterogeneity in respondents’ preferences, careful consideration of the welfare impact of coastal interventions by population segments is required. © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Coastal erosion is a complex and increasingly important problem, largely due to its effects and management strategies. The current context of climate change, together with centuries of human occupation of shorelines, adds pressure for the development of sustainable coastal management policies, the success of which crucially depends on the consideration of all stakeholders’ perspectives. This research investigates users’ preferences over alternative options of coastal erosion management. Through the implementation of a discrete choice experiment, respondents’ preferences regarding management alternatives are elicited, and their willingness to pay for alternatives’ attributes is estimated. The results show that respondents prefer some interventions to mitigate the problem rather than no action, and prefer lighter intervention (palisades, gangways) to heavy infrastructures (rockfills, seawalls, groynes). Moreover, the results show the presence of preference heterogeneity and thus the need to use more flexible and complex models. Based on the results obtained, it is possible to drive some policy implications. First, the do-nothing option is not viable from the population’s standpoint; second, although some type of coastal erosion protection is demanded by the general population, the preferred approach is for light forms, contrary to the policy adopted in the last century, and still overwhelmingly present in the territory. Lastly, given the considerable heterogeneity in respondents’ preferences, careful consideration of the welfare impact of coastal interventions by population segments is required. © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-GGO SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-FOR GBV_ILN_26 |
| container_issue |
7 |
| title_short |
Choice experiments to elicit the users’ preferences for coastal erosion management: the case of Praia da Amorosa |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Pinto, Lígia M. Costa |
| author2Str |
Pinto, Lígia M. Costa |
| ppnlink |
247370592 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T05:57:03.364Z |
| _version_ |
1803626871107092480 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2126107124</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230505112007.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2126107124</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10668-020-00768-0-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oliveira, Susana</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-1081-5732</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Choice experiments to elicit the users’ preferences for coastal erosion management: the case of Praia da Amorosa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Nature B.V. 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Coastal erosion is a complex and increasingly important problem, largely due to its effects and management strategies. The current context of climate change, together with centuries of human occupation of shorelines, adds pressure for the development of sustainable coastal management policies, the success of which crucially depends on the consideration of all stakeholders’ perspectives. This research investigates users’ preferences over alternative options of coastal erosion management. Through the implementation of a discrete choice experiment, respondents’ preferences regarding management alternatives are elicited, and their willingness to pay for alternatives’ attributes is estimated. The results show that respondents prefer some interventions to mitigate the problem rather than no action, and prefer lighter intervention (palisades, gangways) to heavy infrastructures (rockfills, seawalls, groynes). Moreover, the results show the presence of preference heterogeneity and thus the need to use more flexible and complex models. Based on the results obtained, it is possible to drive some policy implications. First, the do-nothing option is not viable from the population’s standpoint; second, although some type of coastal erosion protection is demanded by the general population, the preferred approach is for light forms, contrary to the policy adopted in the last century, and still overwhelmingly present in the territory. Lastly, given the considerable heterogeneity in respondents’ preferences, careful consideration of the welfare impact of coastal interventions by population segments is required.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environmental valuation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Choice experiments</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">GMNL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Preference heterogeneity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Coastal erosion management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pinto, Lígia M. Costa</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-7089-2663</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Environment, development and sustainability</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1999</subfield><subfield code="g">23(2020), 7 vom: 15. Mai, Seite 9749-9765</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)247370592</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1438730-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)27365103X</subfield><subfield code="x">1387-585X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:23</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:9749-9765</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="0">106413708</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)106413708</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="0">106413708</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)106413708</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">83.46$jEntwicklungsökonomie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="0">106414925</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)106414925</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">23</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">9749-9765</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.401513 |