What Explains the Gap in Welfare Use Among Immigrants and Natives?
Abstract We investigate the gap in welfare use between immigrants and natives over a 24-year period using the Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey from 1995 to 2018, spanning periods of economic recessions and recoveries, changes in welfare policy regimes, and polic...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Huang, Xiaoning [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Nature B.V. 2020 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Population research and policy review - Springer Netherlands, 1982, 40(2020), 4 vom: 29. Okt., Seite 819-860 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:40 ; year:2020 ; number:4 ; day:29 ; month:10 ; pages:819-860 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11113-020-09621-8 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2126657205 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2126657205 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230505120417.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 230505s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11113-020-09621-8 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2126657205 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s11113-020-09621-8-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 300 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 3,4 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Huang, Xiaoning |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0001-5813-5993 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a What Explains the Gap in Welfare Use Among Immigrants and Natives? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract We investigate the gap in welfare use between immigrants and natives over a 24-year period using the Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey from 1995 to 2018, spanning periods of economic recessions and recoveries, changes in welfare policy regimes, and policies towards immigrants. A novel contribution of our research is to adopt the Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition analysis to study the effects of demographic factors, macroeconomic trends and policy on welfare use gap between immigrants and natives. Our analysis leads to three main findings: one, if immigrants had the same demographic characteristics as natives their participation in means-tested programs would have been much less overall and much below those of natives. This finding holds true across broader measures of welfare receipt capturing cash and near cash programs and health insurance as well as participation in five specific safety net programs. It also holds true across periods of economic recessions and recovery. Second, we find evidence that the business cycle impacts immigrant and native welfare participation differently. Immigrant participations in Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program and State Children’s Health Insurance Program are more sensitive to the business cycle than native participations. Three, we find that changes in program eligibility explain only a modest proportion of the immigrant-native gap in welfare use. A possible explanation for this finding is that changes in eligibility rules have affected only specific immigrant populations (e.g. new immigrants) whereas our analysis pertains to all immigrants. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Welfare policy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social safety net | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Immigrant | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Recession | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kaushal, Neeraj |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Julia Shu-Huah |0 (orcid)0000-0002-6128-8242 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Population research and policy review |d Springer Netherlands, 1982 |g 40(2020), 4 vom: 29. Okt., Seite 819-860 |w (DE-627)130668141 |w (DE-600)868021-8 |w (DE-576)016213211 |x 0167-5923 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:40 |g year:2020 |g number:4 |g day:29 |g month:10 |g pages:819-860 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-020-09621-8 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-SOW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 40 |j 2020 |e 4 |b 29 |c 10 |h 819-860 | ||
| author_variant |
x h xh n k nk j s h w jsh jshw |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:01675923:2020----::htxlishgpnefruemnim |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s11113-020-09621-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2126657205 (DE-He213)s11113-020-09621-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 VZ 3,4 ssgn Huang, Xiaoning verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-5813-5993 aut What Explains the Gap in Welfare Use Among Immigrants and Natives? 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract We investigate the gap in welfare use between immigrants and natives over a 24-year period using the Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey from 1995 to 2018, spanning periods of economic recessions and recoveries, changes in welfare policy regimes, and policies towards immigrants. A novel contribution of our research is to adopt the Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition analysis to study the effects of demographic factors, macroeconomic trends and policy on welfare use gap between immigrants and natives. Our analysis leads to three main findings: one, if immigrants had the same demographic characteristics as natives their participation in means-tested programs would have been much less overall and much below those of natives. This finding holds true across broader measures of welfare receipt capturing cash and near cash programs and health insurance as well as participation in five specific safety net programs. It also holds true across periods of economic recessions and recovery. Second, we find evidence that the business cycle impacts immigrant and native welfare participation differently. Immigrant participations in Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program and State Children’s Health Insurance Program are more sensitive to the business cycle than native participations. Three, we find that changes in program eligibility explain only a modest proportion of the immigrant-native gap in welfare use. A possible explanation for this finding is that changes in eligibility rules have affected only specific immigrant populations (e.g. new immigrants) whereas our analysis pertains to all immigrants. Welfare policy Social safety net Immigrant Recession Kaushal, Neeraj aut Wang, Julia Shu-Huah (orcid)0000-0002-6128-8242 aut Enthalten in Population research and policy review Springer Netherlands, 1982 40(2020), 4 vom: 29. Okt., Seite 819-860 (DE-627)130668141 (DE-600)868021-8 (DE-576)016213211 0167-5923 nnns volume:40 year:2020 number:4 day:29 month:10 pages:819-860 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-020-09621-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-WIW AR 40 2020 4 29 10 819-860 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s11113-020-09621-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2126657205 (DE-He213)s11113-020-09621-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 VZ 3,4 ssgn Huang, Xiaoning verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-5813-5993 aut What Explains the Gap in Welfare Use Among Immigrants and Natives? 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract We investigate the gap in welfare use between immigrants and natives over a 24-year period using the Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey from 1995 to 2018, spanning periods of economic recessions and recoveries, changes in welfare policy regimes, and policies towards immigrants. A novel contribution of our research is to adopt the Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition analysis to study the effects of demographic factors, macroeconomic trends and policy on welfare use gap between immigrants and natives. Our analysis leads to three main findings: one, if immigrants had the same demographic characteristics as natives their participation in means-tested programs would have been much less overall and much below those of natives. This finding holds true across broader measures of welfare receipt capturing cash and near cash programs and health insurance as well as participation in five specific safety net programs. It also holds true across periods of economic recessions and recovery. Second, we find evidence that the business cycle impacts immigrant and native welfare participation differently. Immigrant participations in Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program and State Children’s Health Insurance Program are more sensitive to the business cycle than native participations. Three, we find that changes in program eligibility explain only a modest proportion of the immigrant-native gap in welfare use. A possible explanation for this finding is that changes in eligibility rules have affected only specific immigrant populations (e.g. new immigrants) whereas our analysis pertains to all immigrants. Welfare policy Social safety net Immigrant Recession Kaushal, Neeraj aut Wang, Julia Shu-Huah (orcid)0000-0002-6128-8242 aut Enthalten in Population research and policy review Springer Netherlands, 1982 40(2020), 4 vom: 29. Okt., Seite 819-860 (DE-627)130668141 (DE-600)868021-8 (DE-576)016213211 0167-5923 nnns volume:40 year:2020 number:4 day:29 month:10 pages:819-860 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-020-09621-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-WIW AR 40 2020 4 29 10 819-860 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11113-020-09621-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2126657205 (DE-He213)s11113-020-09621-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 VZ 3,4 ssgn Huang, Xiaoning verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-5813-5993 aut What Explains the Gap in Welfare Use Among Immigrants and Natives? 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract We investigate the gap in welfare use between immigrants and natives over a 24-year period using the Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey from 1995 to 2018, spanning periods of economic recessions and recoveries, changes in welfare policy regimes, and policies towards immigrants. A novel contribution of our research is to adopt the Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition analysis to study the effects of demographic factors, macroeconomic trends and policy on welfare use gap between immigrants and natives. Our analysis leads to three main findings: one, if immigrants had the same demographic characteristics as natives their participation in means-tested programs would have been much less overall and much below those of natives. This finding holds true across broader measures of welfare receipt capturing cash and near cash programs and health insurance as well as participation in five specific safety net programs. It also holds true across periods of economic recessions and recovery. Second, we find evidence that the business cycle impacts immigrant and native welfare participation differently. Immigrant participations in Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program and State Children’s Health Insurance Program are more sensitive to the business cycle than native participations. Three, we find that changes in program eligibility explain only a modest proportion of the immigrant-native gap in welfare use. A possible explanation for this finding is that changes in eligibility rules have affected only specific immigrant populations (e.g. new immigrants) whereas our analysis pertains to all immigrants. Welfare policy Social safety net Immigrant Recession Kaushal, Neeraj aut Wang, Julia Shu-Huah (orcid)0000-0002-6128-8242 aut Enthalten in Population research and policy review Springer Netherlands, 1982 40(2020), 4 vom: 29. Okt., Seite 819-860 (DE-627)130668141 (DE-600)868021-8 (DE-576)016213211 0167-5923 nnns volume:40 year:2020 number:4 day:29 month:10 pages:819-860 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-020-09621-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-WIW AR 40 2020 4 29 10 819-860 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11113-020-09621-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2126657205 (DE-He213)s11113-020-09621-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 VZ 3,4 ssgn Huang, Xiaoning verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-5813-5993 aut What Explains the Gap in Welfare Use Among Immigrants and Natives? 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract We investigate the gap in welfare use between immigrants and natives over a 24-year period using the Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey from 1995 to 2018, spanning periods of economic recessions and recoveries, changes in welfare policy regimes, and policies towards immigrants. A novel contribution of our research is to adopt the Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition analysis to study the effects of demographic factors, macroeconomic trends and policy on welfare use gap between immigrants and natives. Our analysis leads to three main findings: one, if immigrants had the same demographic characteristics as natives their participation in means-tested programs would have been much less overall and much below those of natives. This finding holds true across broader measures of welfare receipt capturing cash and near cash programs and health insurance as well as participation in five specific safety net programs. It also holds true across periods of economic recessions and recovery. Second, we find evidence that the business cycle impacts immigrant and native welfare participation differently. Immigrant participations in Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program and State Children’s Health Insurance Program are more sensitive to the business cycle than native participations. Three, we find that changes in program eligibility explain only a modest proportion of the immigrant-native gap in welfare use. A possible explanation for this finding is that changes in eligibility rules have affected only specific immigrant populations (e.g. new immigrants) whereas our analysis pertains to all immigrants. Welfare policy Social safety net Immigrant Recession Kaushal, Neeraj aut Wang, Julia Shu-Huah (orcid)0000-0002-6128-8242 aut Enthalten in Population research and policy review Springer Netherlands, 1982 40(2020), 4 vom: 29. Okt., Seite 819-860 (DE-627)130668141 (DE-600)868021-8 (DE-576)016213211 0167-5923 nnns volume:40 year:2020 number:4 day:29 month:10 pages:819-860 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-020-09621-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-WIW AR 40 2020 4 29 10 819-860 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11113-020-09621-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2126657205 (DE-He213)s11113-020-09621-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 VZ 3,4 ssgn Huang, Xiaoning verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-5813-5993 aut What Explains the Gap in Welfare Use Among Immigrants and Natives? 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract We investigate the gap in welfare use between immigrants and natives over a 24-year period using the Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey from 1995 to 2018, spanning periods of economic recessions and recoveries, changes in welfare policy regimes, and policies towards immigrants. A novel contribution of our research is to adopt the Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition analysis to study the effects of demographic factors, macroeconomic trends and policy on welfare use gap between immigrants and natives. Our analysis leads to three main findings: one, if immigrants had the same demographic characteristics as natives their participation in means-tested programs would have been much less overall and much below those of natives. This finding holds true across broader measures of welfare receipt capturing cash and near cash programs and health insurance as well as participation in five specific safety net programs. It also holds true across periods of economic recessions and recovery. Second, we find evidence that the business cycle impacts immigrant and native welfare participation differently. Immigrant participations in Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program and State Children’s Health Insurance Program are more sensitive to the business cycle than native participations. Three, we find that changes in program eligibility explain only a modest proportion of the immigrant-native gap in welfare use. A possible explanation for this finding is that changes in eligibility rules have affected only specific immigrant populations (e.g. new immigrants) whereas our analysis pertains to all immigrants. Welfare policy Social safety net Immigrant Recession Kaushal, Neeraj aut Wang, Julia Shu-Huah (orcid)0000-0002-6128-8242 aut Enthalten in Population research and policy review Springer Netherlands, 1982 40(2020), 4 vom: 29. Okt., Seite 819-860 (DE-627)130668141 (DE-600)868021-8 (DE-576)016213211 0167-5923 nnns volume:40 year:2020 number:4 day:29 month:10 pages:819-860 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-020-09621-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-WIW AR 40 2020 4 29 10 819-860 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Population research and policy review 40(2020), 4 vom: 29. Okt., Seite 819-860 volume:40 year:2020 number:4 day:29 month:10 pages:819-860 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Population research and policy review 40(2020), 4 vom: 29. Okt., Seite 819-860 volume:40 year:2020 number:4 day:29 month:10 pages:819-860 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Welfare policy Social safety net Immigrant Recession |
| dewey-raw |
300 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Population research and policy review |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Huang, Xiaoning @@aut@@ Kaushal, Neeraj @@aut@@ Wang, Julia Shu-Huah @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-10-29T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
130668141 |
| dewey-sort |
3300 |
| id |
OLC2126657205 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2126657205</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230505120417.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11113-020-09621-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2126657205</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11113-020-09621-8-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3,4</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Xiaoning</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-5813-5993</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">What Explains the Gap in Welfare Use Among Immigrants and Natives?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Nature B.V. 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract We investigate the gap in welfare use between immigrants and natives over a 24-year period using the Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey from 1995 to 2018, spanning periods of economic recessions and recoveries, changes in welfare policy regimes, and policies towards immigrants. A novel contribution of our research is to adopt the Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition analysis to study the effects of demographic factors, macroeconomic trends and policy on welfare use gap between immigrants and natives. Our analysis leads to three main findings: one, if immigrants had the same demographic characteristics as natives their participation in means-tested programs would have been much less overall and much below those of natives. This finding holds true across broader measures of welfare receipt capturing cash and near cash programs and health insurance as well as participation in five specific safety net programs. It also holds true across periods of economic recessions and recovery. Second, we find evidence that the business cycle impacts immigrant and native welfare participation differently. Immigrant participations in Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program and State Children’s Health Insurance Program are more sensitive to the business cycle than native participations. Three, we find that changes in program eligibility explain only a modest proportion of the immigrant-native gap in welfare use. A possible explanation for this finding is that changes in eligibility rules have affected only specific immigrant populations (e.g. new immigrants) whereas our analysis pertains to all immigrants.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Welfare policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social safety net</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Immigrant</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recession</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kaushal, Neeraj</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Julia Shu-Huah</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-6128-8242</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Population research and policy review</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1982</subfield><subfield code="g">40(2020), 4 vom: 29. Okt., Seite 819-860</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130668141</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)868021-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)016213211</subfield><subfield code="x">0167-5923</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:40</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:29</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:819-860</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-020-09621-8</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SOW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">40</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">29</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">819-860</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Huang, Xiaoning |
| spellingShingle |
Huang, Xiaoning ddc 300 ssgn 3,4 misc Welfare policy misc Social safety net misc Immigrant misc Recession What Explains the Gap in Welfare Use Among Immigrants and Natives? |
| authorStr |
Huang, Xiaoning |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130668141 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
300 - Social sciences |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0167-5923 |
| topic_title |
300 VZ 3,4 ssgn What Explains the Gap in Welfare Use Among Immigrants and Natives? Welfare policy Social safety net Immigrant Recession |
| topic |
ddc 300 ssgn 3,4 misc Welfare policy misc Social safety net misc Immigrant misc Recession |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 300 ssgn 3,4 misc Welfare policy misc Social safety net misc Immigrant misc Recession |
| topic_browse |
ddc 300 ssgn 3,4 misc Welfare policy misc Social safety net misc Immigrant misc Recession |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Population research and policy review |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
130668141 |
| dewey-tens |
300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Population research and policy review |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130668141 (DE-600)868021-8 (DE-576)016213211 |
| title |
What Explains the Gap in Welfare Use Among Immigrants and Natives? |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2126657205 (DE-He213)s11113-020-09621-8-p |
| title_full |
What Explains the Gap in Welfare Use Among Immigrants and Natives? |
| author_sort |
Huang, Xiaoning |
| journal |
Population research and policy review |
| journalStr |
Population research and policy review |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
819 |
| author_browse |
Huang, Xiaoning Kaushal, Neeraj Wang, Julia Shu-Huah |
| container_volume |
40 |
| class |
300 VZ 3,4 ssgn |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Huang, Xiaoning |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11113-020-09621-8 |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0001-5813-5993 (ORCID)0000-0002-6128-8242 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0001-5813-5993 (orcid)0000-0002-6128-8242 |
| dewey-full |
300 |
| title_sort |
what explains the gap in welfare use among immigrants and natives? |
| title_auth |
What Explains the Gap in Welfare Use Among Immigrants and Natives? |
| abstract |
Abstract We investigate the gap in welfare use between immigrants and natives over a 24-year period using the Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey from 1995 to 2018, spanning periods of economic recessions and recoveries, changes in welfare policy regimes, and policies towards immigrants. A novel contribution of our research is to adopt the Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition analysis to study the effects of demographic factors, macroeconomic trends and policy on welfare use gap between immigrants and natives. Our analysis leads to three main findings: one, if immigrants had the same demographic characteristics as natives their participation in means-tested programs would have been much less overall and much below those of natives. This finding holds true across broader measures of welfare receipt capturing cash and near cash programs and health insurance as well as participation in five specific safety net programs. It also holds true across periods of economic recessions and recovery. Second, we find evidence that the business cycle impacts immigrant and native welfare participation differently. Immigrant participations in Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program and State Children’s Health Insurance Program are more sensitive to the business cycle than native participations. Three, we find that changes in program eligibility explain only a modest proportion of the immigrant-native gap in welfare use. A possible explanation for this finding is that changes in eligibility rules have affected only specific immigrant populations (e.g. new immigrants) whereas our analysis pertains to all immigrants. © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract We investigate the gap in welfare use between immigrants and natives over a 24-year period using the Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey from 1995 to 2018, spanning periods of economic recessions and recoveries, changes in welfare policy regimes, and policies towards immigrants. A novel contribution of our research is to adopt the Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition analysis to study the effects of demographic factors, macroeconomic trends and policy on welfare use gap between immigrants and natives. Our analysis leads to three main findings: one, if immigrants had the same demographic characteristics as natives their participation in means-tested programs would have been much less overall and much below those of natives. This finding holds true across broader measures of welfare receipt capturing cash and near cash programs and health insurance as well as participation in five specific safety net programs. It also holds true across periods of economic recessions and recovery. Second, we find evidence that the business cycle impacts immigrant and native welfare participation differently. Immigrant participations in Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program and State Children’s Health Insurance Program are more sensitive to the business cycle than native participations. Three, we find that changes in program eligibility explain only a modest proportion of the immigrant-native gap in welfare use. A possible explanation for this finding is that changes in eligibility rules have affected only specific immigrant populations (e.g. new immigrants) whereas our analysis pertains to all immigrants. © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract We investigate the gap in welfare use between immigrants and natives over a 24-year period using the Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey from 1995 to 2018, spanning periods of economic recessions and recoveries, changes in welfare policy regimes, and policies towards immigrants. A novel contribution of our research is to adopt the Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition analysis to study the effects of demographic factors, macroeconomic trends and policy on welfare use gap between immigrants and natives. Our analysis leads to three main findings: one, if immigrants had the same demographic characteristics as natives their participation in means-tested programs would have been much less overall and much below those of natives. This finding holds true across broader measures of welfare receipt capturing cash and near cash programs and health insurance as well as participation in five specific safety net programs. It also holds true across periods of economic recessions and recovery. Second, we find evidence that the business cycle impacts immigrant and native welfare participation differently. Immigrant participations in Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program and State Children’s Health Insurance Program are more sensitive to the business cycle than native participations. Three, we find that changes in program eligibility explain only a modest proportion of the immigrant-native gap in welfare use. A possible explanation for this finding is that changes in eligibility rules have affected only specific immigrant populations (e.g. new immigrants) whereas our analysis pertains to all immigrants. © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-WIW |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
What Explains the Gap in Welfare Use Among Immigrants and Natives? |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-020-09621-8 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Kaushal, Neeraj Wang, Julia Shu-Huah |
| author2Str |
Kaushal, Neeraj Wang, Julia Shu-Huah |
| ppnlink |
130668141 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s11113-020-09621-8 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T07:53:45.334Z |
| _version_ |
1803634213216321536 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2126657205</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230505120417.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11113-020-09621-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2126657205</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11113-020-09621-8-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3,4</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Xiaoning</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-5813-5993</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">What Explains the Gap in Welfare Use Among Immigrants and Natives?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Nature B.V. 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract We investigate the gap in welfare use between immigrants and natives over a 24-year period using the Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey from 1995 to 2018, spanning periods of economic recessions and recoveries, changes in welfare policy regimes, and policies towards immigrants. A novel contribution of our research is to adopt the Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition analysis to study the effects of demographic factors, macroeconomic trends and policy on welfare use gap between immigrants and natives. Our analysis leads to three main findings: one, if immigrants had the same demographic characteristics as natives their participation in means-tested programs would have been much less overall and much below those of natives. This finding holds true across broader measures of welfare receipt capturing cash and near cash programs and health insurance as well as participation in five specific safety net programs. It also holds true across periods of economic recessions and recovery. Second, we find evidence that the business cycle impacts immigrant and native welfare participation differently. Immigrant participations in Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program and State Children’s Health Insurance Program are more sensitive to the business cycle than native participations. Three, we find that changes in program eligibility explain only a modest proportion of the immigrant-native gap in welfare use. A possible explanation for this finding is that changes in eligibility rules have affected only specific immigrant populations (e.g. new immigrants) whereas our analysis pertains to all immigrants.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Welfare policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social safety net</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Immigrant</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recession</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kaushal, Neeraj</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Julia Shu-Huah</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-6128-8242</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Population research and policy review</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1982</subfield><subfield code="g">40(2020), 4 vom: 29. Okt., Seite 819-860</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130668141</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)868021-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)016213211</subfield><subfield code="x">0167-5923</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:40</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:29</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:819-860</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-020-09621-8</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SOW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">40</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">29</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">819-860</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398529 |