On the analysis and evaluation of information retrieval models for social book search
Abstract Social Book Search (SBS) studies how the Social Web impacts book retrieval. This impact is studied in two steps. In this first step, called the baseline run, the search index having bibliographic descriptions or professional metadata and user-generated content or social metadata is searched...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Ullah, Irfan [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Multimedia tools and applications - Springer US, 1995, 82(2022), 5 vom: 27. Juli, Seite 6431-6478 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:82 ; year:2022 ; number:5 ; day:27 ; month:07 ; pages:6431-6478 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11042-022-13417-7 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2133581898 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2133581898 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230506151814.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 230506s2022 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11042-022-13417-7 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2133581898 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s11042-022-13417-7-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 070 |a 004 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Ullah, Irfan |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0003-0693-5467 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a On the analysis and evaluation of information retrieval models for social book search |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Social Book Search (SBS) studies how the Social Web impacts book retrieval. This impact is studied in two steps. In this first step, called the baseline run, the search index having bibliographic descriptions or professional metadata and user-generated content or social metadata is searched against the search queries and ranked using a retrieval model. In the second step, called re-ranking, the baseline search results are re-ordered using social metadata to see if the search relevance improves. However, this improvement in the search relevance can only be justified if the baseline run is made stronger by considering the contribution of the query, index, and retrieval model. Although the existing studies well-explored the role of query formulation and document representation, only a few considered the contribution of the retrieval models. Also, they experimented with a few retrieval models. This article fills this gap in the literature. It identifies the best retrieval model in the SBS context by experimenting with twenty-five retrieval models using the Terrier IR platform on the Amazon/LibraryThing dataset holding topic sets, relevance judgments, and a book corpus of 2.8 million records. The findings suggest that these retrieval models behave differently with changes in query and document representation. DirichletLM and InL2 are the best-performing retrieval models for a majority of the retrieval runs. The previous best-performing SBS studies would have produced better results if they had tested multiple retrieval models in selecting baseline runs. The findings confirm that the retrieval model plays a vital role in developing stronger baseline runs. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Information retrieval | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Retrieval models | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Book retrieval | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social book search | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social metadata | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Khusro, Shah |0 (orcid)0000-0002-7734-7243 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Multimedia tools and applications |d Springer US, 1995 |g 82(2022), 5 vom: 27. Juli, Seite 6431-6478 |w (DE-627)189064145 |w (DE-600)1287642-2 |w (DE-576)052842126 |x 1380-7501 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:82 |g year:2022 |g number:5 |g day:27 |g month:07 |g pages:6431-6478 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13417-7 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-MAT | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-BUB | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-MKW | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 82 |j 2022 |e 5 |b 27 |c 07 |h 6431-6478 | ||
| author_variant |
i u iu s k sk |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:13807501:2022----::nhaayiadvlainfnomtortivloes |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s11042-022-13417-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2133581898 (DE-He213)s11042-022-13417-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 070 004 VZ Ullah, Irfan verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-0693-5467 aut On the analysis and evaluation of information retrieval models for social book search 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract Social Book Search (SBS) studies how the Social Web impacts book retrieval. This impact is studied in two steps. In this first step, called the baseline run, the search index having bibliographic descriptions or professional metadata and user-generated content or social metadata is searched against the search queries and ranked using a retrieval model. In the second step, called re-ranking, the baseline search results are re-ordered using social metadata to see if the search relevance improves. However, this improvement in the search relevance can only be justified if the baseline run is made stronger by considering the contribution of the query, index, and retrieval model. Although the existing studies well-explored the role of query formulation and document representation, only a few considered the contribution of the retrieval models. Also, they experimented with a few retrieval models. This article fills this gap in the literature. It identifies the best retrieval model in the SBS context by experimenting with twenty-five retrieval models using the Terrier IR platform on the Amazon/LibraryThing dataset holding topic sets, relevance judgments, and a book corpus of 2.8 million records. The findings suggest that these retrieval models behave differently with changes in query and document representation. DirichletLM and InL2 are the best-performing retrieval models for a majority of the retrieval runs. The previous best-performing SBS studies would have produced better results if they had tested multiple retrieval models in selecting baseline runs. The findings confirm that the retrieval model plays a vital role in developing stronger baseline runs. Information retrieval Retrieval models Book retrieval Social book search Social metadata Khusro, Shah (orcid)0000-0002-7734-7243 aut Enthalten in Multimedia tools and applications Springer US, 1995 82(2022), 5 vom: 27. Juli, Seite 6431-6478 (DE-627)189064145 (DE-600)1287642-2 (DE-576)052842126 1380-7501 nnns volume:82 year:2022 number:5 day:27 month:07 pages:6431-6478 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13417-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OLC-MKW AR 82 2022 5 27 07 6431-6478 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s11042-022-13417-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2133581898 (DE-He213)s11042-022-13417-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 070 004 VZ Ullah, Irfan verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-0693-5467 aut On the analysis and evaluation of information retrieval models for social book search 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract Social Book Search (SBS) studies how the Social Web impacts book retrieval. This impact is studied in two steps. In this first step, called the baseline run, the search index having bibliographic descriptions or professional metadata and user-generated content or social metadata is searched against the search queries and ranked using a retrieval model. In the second step, called re-ranking, the baseline search results are re-ordered using social metadata to see if the search relevance improves. However, this improvement in the search relevance can only be justified if the baseline run is made stronger by considering the contribution of the query, index, and retrieval model. Although the existing studies well-explored the role of query formulation and document representation, only a few considered the contribution of the retrieval models. Also, they experimented with a few retrieval models. This article fills this gap in the literature. It identifies the best retrieval model in the SBS context by experimenting with twenty-five retrieval models using the Terrier IR platform on the Amazon/LibraryThing dataset holding topic sets, relevance judgments, and a book corpus of 2.8 million records. The findings suggest that these retrieval models behave differently with changes in query and document representation. DirichletLM and InL2 are the best-performing retrieval models for a majority of the retrieval runs. The previous best-performing SBS studies would have produced better results if they had tested multiple retrieval models in selecting baseline runs. The findings confirm that the retrieval model plays a vital role in developing stronger baseline runs. Information retrieval Retrieval models Book retrieval Social book search Social metadata Khusro, Shah (orcid)0000-0002-7734-7243 aut Enthalten in Multimedia tools and applications Springer US, 1995 82(2022), 5 vom: 27. Juli, Seite 6431-6478 (DE-627)189064145 (DE-600)1287642-2 (DE-576)052842126 1380-7501 nnns volume:82 year:2022 number:5 day:27 month:07 pages:6431-6478 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13417-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OLC-MKW AR 82 2022 5 27 07 6431-6478 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11042-022-13417-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2133581898 (DE-He213)s11042-022-13417-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 070 004 VZ Ullah, Irfan verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-0693-5467 aut On the analysis and evaluation of information retrieval models for social book search 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract Social Book Search (SBS) studies how the Social Web impacts book retrieval. This impact is studied in two steps. In this first step, called the baseline run, the search index having bibliographic descriptions or professional metadata and user-generated content or social metadata is searched against the search queries and ranked using a retrieval model. In the second step, called re-ranking, the baseline search results are re-ordered using social metadata to see if the search relevance improves. However, this improvement in the search relevance can only be justified if the baseline run is made stronger by considering the contribution of the query, index, and retrieval model. Although the existing studies well-explored the role of query formulation and document representation, only a few considered the contribution of the retrieval models. Also, they experimented with a few retrieval models. This article fills this gap in the literature. It identifies the best retrieval model in the SBS context by experimenting with twenty-five retrieval models using the Terrier IR platform on the Amazon/LibraryThing dataset holding topic sets, relevance judgments, and a book corpus of 2.8 million records. The findings suggest that these retrieval models behave differently with changes in query and document representation. DirichletLM and InL2 are the best-performing retrieval models for a majority of the retrieval runs. The previous best-performing SBS studies would have produced better results if they had tested multiple retrieval models in selecting baseline runs. The findings confirm that the retrieval model plays a vital role in developing stronger baseline runs. Information retrieval Retrieval models Book retrieval Social book search Social metadata Khusro, Shah (orcid)0000-0002-7734-7243 aut Enthalten in Multimedia tools and applications Springer US, 1995 82(2022), 5 vom: 27. Juli, Seite 6431-6478 (DE-627)189064145 (DE-600)1287642-2 (DE-576)052842126 1380-7501 nnns volume:82 year:2022 number:5 day:27 month:07 pages:6431-6478 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13417-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OLC-MKW AR 82 2022 5 27 07 6431-6478 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11042-022-13417-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2133581898 (DE-He213)s11042-022-13417-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 070 004 VZ Ullah, Irfan verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-0693-5467 aut On the analysis and evaluation of information retrieval models for social book search 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract Social Book Search (SBS) studies how the Social Web impacts book retrieval. This impact is studied in two steps. In this first step, called the baseline run, the search index having bibliographic descriptions or professional metadata and user-generated content or social metadata is searched against the search queries and ranked using a retrieval model. In the second step, called re-ranking, the baseline search results are re-ordered using social metadata to see if the search relevance improves. However, this improvement in the search relevance can only be justified if the baseline run is made stronger by considering the contribution of the query, index, and retrieval model. Although the existing studies well-explored the role of query formulation and document representation, only a few considered the contribution of the retrieval models. Also, they experimented with a few retrieval models. This article fills this gap in the literature. It identifies the best retrieval model in the SBS context by experimenting with twenty-five retrieval models using the Terrier IR platform on the Amazon/LibraryThing dataset holding topic sets, relevance judgments, and a book corpus of 2.8 million records. The findings suggest that these retrieval models behave differently with changes in query and document representation. DirichletLM and InL2 are the best-performing retrieval models for a majority of the retrieval runs. The previous best-performing SBS studies would have produced better results if they had tested multiple retrieval models in selecting baseline runs. The findings confirm that the retrieval model plays a vital role in developing stronger baseline runs. Information retrieval Retrieval models Book retrieval Social book search Social metadata Khusro, Shah (orcid)0000-0002-7734-7243 aut Enthalten in Multimedia tools and applications Springer US, 1995 82(2022), 5 vom: 27. Juli, Seite 6431-6478 (DE-627)189064145 (DE-600)1287642-2 (DE-576)052842126 1380-7501 nnns volume:82 year:2022 number:5 day:27 month:07 pages:6431-6478 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13417-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OLC-MKW AR 82 2022 5 27 07 6431-6478 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11042-022-13417-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2133581898 (DE-He213)s11042-022-13417-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 070 004 VZ Ullah, Irfan verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-0693-5467 aut On the analysis and evaluation of information retrieval models for social book search 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract Social Book Search (SBS) studies how the Social Web impacts book retrieval. This impact is studied in two steps. In this first step, called the baseline run, the search index having bibliographic descriptions or professional metadata and user-generated content or social metadata is searched against the search queries and ranked using a retrieval model. In the second step, called re-ranking, the baseline search results are re-ordered using social metadata to see if the search relevance improves. However, this improvement in the search relevance can only be justified if the baseline run is made stronger by considering the contribution of the query, index, and retrieval model. Although the existing studies well-explored the role of query formulation and document representation, only a few considered the contribution of the retrieval models. Also, they experimented with a few retrieval models. This article fills this gap in the literature. It identifies the best retrieval model in the SBS context by experimenting with twenty-five retrieval models using the Terrier IR platform on the Amazon/LibraryThing dataset holding topic sets, relevance judgments, and a book corpus of 2.8 million records. The findings suggest that these retrieval models behave differently with changes in query and document representation. DirichletLM and InL2 are the best-performing retrieval models for a majority of the retrieval runs. The previous best-performing SBS studies would have produced better results if they had tested multiple retrieval models in selecting baseline runs. The findings confirm that the retrieval model plays a vital role in developing stronger baseline runs. Information retrieval Retrieval models Book retrieval Social book search Social metadata Khusro, Shah (orcid)0000-0002-7734-7243 aut Enthalten in Multimedia tools and applications Springer US, 1995 82(2022), 5 vom: 27. Juli, Seite 6431-6478 (DE-627)189064145 (DE-600)1287642-2 (DE-576)052842126 1380-7501 nnns volume:82 year:2022 number:5 day:27 month:07 pages:6431-6478 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13417-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OLC-MKW AR 82 2022 5 27 07 6431-6478 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Multimedia tools and applications 82(2022), 5 vom: 27. Juli, Seite 6431-6478 volume:82 year:2022 number:5 day:27 month:07 pages:6431-6478 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Multimedia tools and applications 82(2022), 5 vom: 27. Juli, Seite 6431-6478 volume:82 year:2022 number:5 day:27 month:07 pages:6431-6478 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Information retrieval Retrieval models Book retrieval Social book search Social metadata |
| dewey-raw |
070 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Multimedia tools and applications |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ullah, Irfan @@aut@@ Khusro, Shah @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-07-27T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
189064145 |
| dewey-sort |
270 |
| id |
OLC2133581898 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2133581898</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230506151814.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230506s2022 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11042-022-13417-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2133581898</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11042-022-13417-7-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">070</subfield><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ullah, Irfan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-0693-5467</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">On the analysis and evaluation of information retrieval models for social book search</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Social Book Search (SBS) studies how the Social Web impacts book retrieval. This impact is studied in two steps. In this first step, called the baseline run, the search index having bibliographic descriptions or professional metadata and user-generated content or social metadata is searched against the search queries and ranked using a retrieval model. In the second step, called re-ranking, the baseline search results are re-ordered using social metadata to see if the search relevance improves. However, this improvement in the search relevance can only be justified if the baseline run is made stronger by considering the contribution of the query, index, and retrieval model. Although the existing studies well-explored the role of query formulation and document representation, only a few considered the contribution of the retrieval models. Also, they experimented with a few retrieval models. This article fills this gap in the literature. It identifies the best retrieval model in the SBS context by experimenting with twenty-five retrieval models using the Terrier IR platform on the Amazon/LibraryThing dataset holding topic sets, relevance judgments, and a book corpus of 2.8 million records. The findings suggest that these retrieval models behave differently with changes in query and document representation. DirichletLM and InL2 are the best-performing retrieval models for a majority of the retrieval runs. The previous best-performing SBS studies would have produced better results if they had tested multiple retrieval models in selecting baseline runs. The findings confirm that the retrieval model plays a vital role in developing stronger baseline runs.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Information retrieval</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Retrieval models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Book retrieval</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social book search</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social metadata</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Khusro, Shah</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-7734-7243</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Multimedia tools and applications</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1995</subfield><subfield code="g">82(2022), 5 vom: 27. Juli, Seite 6431-6478</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)189064145</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1287642-2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)052842126</subfield><subfield code="x">1380-7501</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:82</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:27</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:6431-6478</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13417-7</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-BUB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MKW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">82</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">27</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield><subfield code="h">6431-6478</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Ullah, Irfan |
| spellingShingle |
Ullah, Irfan ddc 070 misc Information retrieval misc Retrieval models misc Book retrieval misc Social book search misc Social metadata On the analysis and evaluation of information retrieval models for social book search |
| authorStr |
Ullah, Irfan |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)189064145 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
070 - News media, journalism & publishing 004 - Data processing & computer science |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1380-7501 |
| topic_title |
070 004 VZ On the analysis and evaluation of information retrieval models for social book search Information retrieval Retrieval models Book retrieval Social book search Social metadata |
| topic |
ddc 070 misc Information retrieval misc Retrieval models misc Book retrieval misc Social book search misc Social metadata |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 070 misc Information retrieval misc Retrieval models misc Book retrieval misc Social book search misc Social metadata |
| topic_browse |
ddc 070 misc Information retrieval misc Retrieval models misc Book retrieval misc Social book search misc Social metadata |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Multimedia tools and applications |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
189064145 |
| dewey-tens |
070 - News media, journalism & publishing 000 - Computer science, knowledge & systems |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Multimedia tools and applications |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)189064145 (DE-600)1287642-2 (DE-576)052842126 |
| title |
On the analysis and evaluation of information retrieval models for social book search |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2133581898 (DE-He213)s11042-022-13417-7-p |
| title_full |
On the analysis and evaluation of information retrieval models for social book search |
| author_sort |
Ullah, Irfan |
| journal |
Multimedia tools and applications |
| journalStr |
Multimedia tools and applications |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
000 - Computer science, information & general works |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
6431 |
| author_browse |
Ullah, Irfan Khusro, Shah |
| container_volume |
82 |
| class |
070 004 VZ |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Ullah, Irfan |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11042-022-13417-7 |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0003-0693-5467 (ORCID)0000-0002-7734-7243 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0003-0693-5467 (orcid)0000-0002-7734-7243 |
| dewey-full |
070 004 |
| title_sort |
on the analysis and evaluation of information retrieval models for social book search |
| title_auth |
On the analysis and evaluation of information retrieval models for social book search |
| abstract |
Abstract Social Book Search (SBS) studies how the Social Web impacts book retrieval. This impact is studied in two steps. In this first step, called the baseline run, the search index having bibliographic descriptions or professional metadata and user-generated content or social metadata is searched against the search queries and ranked using a retrieval model. In the second step, called re-ranking, the baseline search results are re-ordered using social metadata to see if the search relevance improves. However, this improvement in the search relevance can only be justified if the baseline run is made stronger by considering the contribution of the query, index, and retrieval model. Although the existing studies well-explored the role of query formulation and document representation, only a few considered the contribution of the retrieval models. Also, they experimented with a few retrieval models. This article fills this gap in the literature. It identifies the best retrieval model in the SBS context by experimenting with twenty-five retrieval models using the Terrier IR platform on the Amazon/LibraryThing dataset holding topic sets, relevance judgments, and a book corpus of 2.8 million records. The findings suggest that these retrieval models behave differently with changes in query and document representation. DirichletLM and InL2 are the best-performing retrieval models for a majority of the retrieval runs. The previous best-performing SBS studies would have produced better results if they had tested multiple retrieval models in selecting baseline runs. The findings confirm that the retrieval model plays a vital role in developing stronger baseline runs. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Social Book Search (SBS) studies how the Social Web impacts book retrieval. This impact is studied in two steps. In this first step, called the baseline run, the search index having bibliographic descriptions or professional metadata and user-generated content or social metadata is searched against the search queries and ranked using a retrieval model. In the second step, called re-ranking, the baseline search results are re-ordered using social metadata to see if the search relevance improves. However, this improvement in the search relevance can only be justified if the baseline run is made stronger by considering the contribution of the query, index, and retrieval model. Although the existing studies well-explored the role of query formulation and document representation, only a few considered the contribution of the retrieval models. Also, they experimented with a few retrieval models. This article fills this gap in the literature. It identifies the best retrieval model in the SBS context by experimenting with twenty-five retrieval models using the Terrier IR platform on the Amazon/LibraryThing dataset holding topic sets, relevance judgments, and a book corpus of 2.8 million records. The findings suggest that these retrieval models behave differently with changes in query and document representation. DirichletLM and InL2 are the best-performing retrieval models for a majority of the retrieval runs. The previous best-performing SBS studies would have produced better results if they had tested multiple retrieval models in selecting baseline runs. The findings confirm that the retrieval model plays a vital role in developing stronger baseline runs. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Social Book Search (SBS) studies how the Social Web impacts book retrieval. This impact is studied in two steps. In this first step, called the baseline run, the search index having bibliographic descriptions or professional metadata and user-generated content or social metadata is searched against the search queries and ranked using a retrieval model. In the second step, called re-ranking, the baseline search results are re-ordered using social metadata to see if the search relevance improves. However, this improvement in the search relevance can only be justified if the baseline run is made stronger by considering the contribution of the query, index, and retrieval model. Although the existing studies well-explored the role of query formulation and document representation, only a few considered the contribution of the retrieval models. Also, they experimented with a few retrieval models. This article fills this gap in the literature. It identifies the best retrieval model in the SBS context by experimenting with twenty-five retrieval models using the Terrier IR platform on the Amazon/LibraryThing dataset holding topic sets, relevance judgments, and a book corpus of 2.8 million records. The findings suggest that these retrieval models behave differently with changes in query and document representation. DirichletLM and InL2 are the best-performing retrieval models for a majority of the retrieval runs. The previous best-performing SBS studies would have produced better results if they had tested multiple retrieval models in selecting baseline runs. The findings confirm that the retrieval model plays a vital role in developing stronger baseline runs. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OLC-MKW |
| container_issue |
5 |
| title_short |
On the analysis and evaluation of information retrieval models for social book search |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13417-7 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Khusro, Shah |
| author2Str |
Khusro, Shah |
| ppnlink |
189064145 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s11042-022-13417-7 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T20:19:02.237Z |
| _version_ |
1803590505320153088 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2133581898</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230506151814.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230506s2022 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11042-022-13417-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2133581898</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11042-022-13417-7-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">070</subfield><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ullah, Irfan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-0693-5467</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">On the analysis and evaluation of information retrieval models for social book search</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Social Book Search (SBS) studies how the Social Web impacts book retrieval. This impact is studied in two steps. In this first step, called the baseline run, the search index having bibliographic descriptions or professional metadata and user-generated content or social metadata is searched against the search queries and ranked using a retrieval model. In the second step, called re-ranking, the baseline search results are re-ordered using social metadata to see if the search relevance improves. However, this improvement in the search relevance can only be justified if the baseline run is made stronger by considering the contribution of the query, index, and retrieval model. Although the existing studies well-explored the role of query formulation and document representation, only a few considered the contribution of the retrieval models. Also, they experimented with a few retrieval models. This article fills this gap in the literature. It identifies the best retrieval model in the SBS context by experimenting with twenty-five retrieval models using the Terrier IR platform on the Amazon/LibraryThing dataset holding topic sets, relevance judgments, and a book corpus of 2.8 million records. The findings suggest that these retrieval models behave differently with changes in query and document representation. DirichletLM and InL2 are the best-performing retrieval models for a majority of the retrieval runs. The previous best-performing SBS studies would have produced better results if they had tested multiple retrieval models in selecting baseline runs. The findings confirm that the retrieval model plays a vital role in developing stronger baseline runs.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Information retrieval</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Retrieval models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Book retrieval</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social book search</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social metadata</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Khusro, Shah</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-7734-7243</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Multimedia tools and applications</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1995</subfield><subfield code="g">82(2022), 5 vom: 27. Juli, Seite 6431-6478</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)189064145</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1287642-2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)052842126</subfield><subfield code="x">1380-7501</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:82</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:27</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:6431-6478</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13417-7</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-BUB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MKW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">82</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">27</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield><subfield code="h">6431-6478</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3998795 |