Family, geographical distance and residential (im)mobility behaviour in China
Abstract This study investigates how the residential locations of extended family members influence residential (im)mobility behaviour in the urbanizing and industrializing context of China. It engages with how residential mobility as family adaptive strategies are structured by traditional family b...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
He, Qiong [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of housing and the built environment - Springer Netherlands, 2000, 38(2022), 3 vom: 14. Dez., Seite 1457-1489 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:38 ; year:2022 ; number:3 ; day:14 ; month:12 ; pages:1457-1489 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10901-022-09979-5 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2145332219 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2145332219 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240118103959.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 240118s2022 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10901-022-09979-5 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2145332219 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10901-022-09979-5-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 690 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a He, Qiong |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0002-4753-4830 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Family, geographical distance and residential (im)mobility behaviour in China |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract This study investigates how the residential locations of extended family members influence residential (im)mobility behaviour in the urbanizing and industrializing context of China. It engages with how residential mobility as family adaptive strategies are structured by traditional family beliefs, welfare systems and structural modernization processes. For younger adults who have parents but no adult children, when they co-reside with their parents, they are more likely to move rather than staying put. But they usually move short distances within the county rather than outside the county. This mainly implies a process of moving out of the intergenerational households and establishing their independent households. The presence of their parents at the county scale also deters them from moving outside the county. These young adults seem to be bounded within the county by family ties. Besides, when they have siblings within the county, they are more likely to move outside the county than within the county; siblings near their parents may allow other siblings to move away for job and education opportunities, indicating a responsibility-sharing theory. For older adults who have young adult children but no living parents, they are more likely to move outside the county when their nearest adult child(ren) is outside the county, a strong implication of moving towards their adult children. For those who have both living parents and adult children, they are more likely to stay put or to move locally within the county, rather than moving out the county, when their parents are at the county scale. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Family | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Geography distance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Welfare regime | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Residential mobility | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Modernization | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of housing and the built environment |d Springer Netherlands, 2000 |g 38(2022), 3 vom: 14. Dez., Seite 1457-1489 |w (DE-627)317673394 |w (DE-600)2020687-2 |w (DE-576)9317673392 |x 1566-4910 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:38 |g year:2022 |g number:3 |g day:14 |g month:12 |g pages:1457-1489 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09979-5 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-UMW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-ARC | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines |q VZ |0 106423398 |0 (DE-625)106423398 |
| 936 | b | k | |a 74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung |q VZ |0 106411039 |0 (DE-625)106411039 |
| 936 | b | k | |a 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines |q VZ |0 106413708 |0 (DE-625)106413708 |
| 936 | b | k | |a 56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur |q VZ |0 106421158 |0 (DE-625)106421158 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 38 |j 2022 |e 3 |b 14 |c 12 |h 1457-1489 | ||
| author_variant |
q h qh |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:15664910:2022----::aiyegahclitnenrsdnilmoii |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
| bklnumber |
56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines 74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines 56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10901-022-09979-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2145332219 (DE-He213)s10901-022-09979-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 VZ 56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines bkl 74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung bkl 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur bkl He, Qiong verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4753-4830 aut Family, geographical distance and residential (im)mobility behaviour in China 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract This study investigates how the residential locations of extended family members influence residential (im)mobility behaviour in the urbanizing and industrializing context of China. It engages with how residential mobility as family adaptive strategies are structured by traditional family beliefs, welfare systems and structural modernization processes. For younger adults who have parents but no adult children, when they co-reside with their parents, they are more likely to move rather than staying put. But they usually move short distances within the county rather than outside the county. This mainly implies a process of moving out of the intergenerational households and establishing their independent households. The presence of their parents at the county scale also deters them from moving outside the county. These young adults seem to be bounded within the county by family ties. Besides, when they have siblings within the county, they are more likely to move outside the county than within the county; siblings near their parents may allow other siblings to move away for job and education opportunities, indicating a responsibility-sharing theory. For older adults who have young adult children but no living parents, they are more likely to move outside the county when their nearest adult child(ren) is outside the county, a strong implication of moving towards their adult children. For those who have both living parents and adult children, they are more likely to stay put or to move locally within the county, rather than moving out the county, when their parents are at the county scale. Family Geography distance Welfare regime Residential mobility Modernization Enthalten in Journal of housing and the built environment Springer Netherlands, 2000 38(2022), 3 vom: 14. Dez., Seite 1457-1489 (DE-627)317673394 (DE-600)2020687-2 (DE-576)9317673392 1566-4910 nnns volume:38 year:2022 number:3 day:14 month:12 pages:1457-1489 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09979-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC 56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines VZ 106423398 (DE-625)106423398 74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung VZ 106411039 (DE-625)106411039 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines VZ 106413708 (DE-625)106413708 56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur VZ 106421158 (DE-625)106421158 AR 38 2022 3 14 12 1457-1489 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10901-022-09979-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2145332219 (DE-He213)s10901-022-09979-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 VZ 56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines bkl 74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung bkl 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur bkl He, Qiong verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4753-4830 aut Family, geographical distance and residential (im)mobility behaviour in China 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract This study investigates how the residential locations of extended family members influence residential (im)mobility behaviour in the urbanizing and industrializing context of China. It engages with how residential mobility as family adaptive strategies are structured by traditional family beliefs, welfare systems and structural modernization processes. For younger adults who have parents but no adult children, when they co-reside with their parents, they are more likely to move rather than staying put. But they usually move short distances within the county rather than outside the county. This mainly implies a process of moving out of the intergenerational households and establishing their independent households. The presence of their parents at the county scale also deters them from moving outside the county. These young adults seem to be bounded within the county by family ties. Besides, when they have siblings within the county, they are more likely to move outside the county than within the county; siblings near their parents may allow other siblings to move away for job and education opportunities, indicating a responsibility-sharing theory. For older adults who have young adult children but no living parents, they are more likely to move outside the county when their nearest adult child(ren) is outside the county, a strong implication of moving towards their adult children. For those who have both living parents and adult children, they are more likely to stay put or to move locally within the county, rather than moving out the county, when their parents are at the county scale. Family Geography distance Welfare regime Residential mobility Modernization Enthalten in Journal of housing and the built environment Springer Netherlands, 2000 38(2022), 3 vom: 14. Dez., Seite 1457-1489 (DE-627)317673394 (DE-600)2020687-2 (DE-576)9317673392 1566-4910 nnns volume:38 year:2022 number:3 day:14 month:12 pages:1457-1489 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09979-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC 56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines VZ 106423398 (DE-625)106423398 74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung VZ 106411039 (DE-625)106411039 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines VZ 106413708 (DE-625)106413708 56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur VZ 106421158 (DE-625)106421158 AR 38 2022 3 14 12 1457-1489 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10901-022-09979-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2145332219 (DE-He213)s10901-022-09979-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 VZ 56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines bkl 74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung bkl 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur bkl He, Qiong verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4753-4830 aut Family, geographical distance and residential (im)mobility behaviour in China 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract This study investigates how the residential locations of extended family members influence residential (im)mobility behaviour in the urbanizing and industrializing context of China. It engages with how residential mobility as family adaptive strategies are structured by traditional family beliefs, welfare systems and structural modernization processes. For younger adults who have parents but no adult children, when they co-reside with their parents, they are more likely to move rather than staying put. But they usually move short distances within the county rather than outside the county. This mainly implies a process of moving out of the intergenerational households and establishing their independent households. The presence of their parents at the county scale also deters them from moving outside the county. These young adults seem to be bounded within the county by family ties. Besides, when they have siblings within the county, they are more likely to move outside the county than within the county; siblings near their parents may allow other siblings to move away for job and education opportunities, indicating a responsibility-sharing theory. For older adults who have young adult children but no living parents, they are more likely to move outside the county when their nearest adult child(ren) is outside the county, a strong implication of moving towards their adult children. For those who have both living parents and adult children, they are more likely to stay put or to move locally within the county, rather than moving out the county, when their parents are at the county scale. Family Geography distance Welfare regime Residential mobility Modernization Enthalten in Journal of housing and the built environment Springer Netherlands, 2000 38(2022), 3 vom: 14. Dez., Seite 1457-1489 (DE-627)317673394 (DE-600)2020687-2 (DE-576)9317673392 1566-4910 nnns volume:38 year:2022 number:3 day:14 month:12 pages:1457-1489 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09979-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC 56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines VZ 106423398 (DE-625)106423398 74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung VZ 106411039 (DE-625)106411039 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines VZ 106413708 (DE-625)106413708 56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur VZ 106421158 (DE-625)106421158 AR 38 2022 3 14 12 1457-1489 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10901-022-09979-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2145332219 (DE-He213)s10901-022-09979-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 VZ 56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines bkl 74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung bkl 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur bkl He, Qiong verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4753-4830 aut Family, geographical distance and residential (im)mobility behaviour in China 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract This study investigates how the residential locations of extended family members influence residential (im)mobility behaviour in the urbanizing and industrializing context of China. It engages with how residential mobility as family adaptive strategies are structured by traditional family beliefs, welfare systems and structural modernization processes. For younger adults who have parents but no adult children, when they co-reside with their parents, they are more likely to move rather than staying put. But they usually move short distances within the county rather than outside the county. This mainly implies a process of moving out of the intergenerational households and establishing their independent households. The presence of their parents at the county scale also deters them from moving outside the county. These young adults seem to be bounded within the county by family ties. Besides, when they have siblings within the county, they are more likely to move outside the county than within the county; siblings near their parents may allow other siblings to move away for job and education opportunities, indicating a responsibility-sharing theory. For older adults who have young adult children but no living parents, they are more likely to move outside the county when their nearest adult child(ren) is outside the county, a strong implication of moving towards their adult children. For those who have both living parents and adult children, they are more likely to stay put or to move locally within the county, rather than moving out the county, when their parents are at the county scale. Family Geography distance Welfare regime Residential mobility Modernization Enthalten in Journal of housing and the built environment Springer Netherlands, 2000 38(2022), 3 vom: 14. Dez., Seite 1457-1489 (DE-627)317673394 (DE-600)2020687-2 (DE-576)9317673392 1566-4910 nnns volume:38 year:2022 number:3 day:14 month:12 pages:1457-1489 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09979-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC 56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines VZ 106423398 (DE-625)106423398 74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung VZ 106411039 (DE-625)106411039 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines VZ 106413708 (DE-625)106413708 56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur VZ 106421158 (DE-625)106421158 AR 38 2022 3 14 12 1457-1489 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10901-022-09979-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2145332219 (DE-He213)s10901-022-09979-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 VZ 56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines bkl 74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung bkl 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur bkl He, Qiong verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4753-4830 aut Family, geographical distance and residential (im)mobility behaviour in China 2022 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract This study investigates how the residential locations of extended family members influence residential (im)mobility behaviour in the urbanizing and industrializing context of China. It engages with how residential mobility as family adaptive strategies are structured by traditional family beliefs, welfare systems and structural modernization processes. For younger adults who have parents but no adult children, when they co-reside with their parents, they are more likely to move rather than staying put. But they usually move short distances within the county rather than outside the county. This mainly implies a process of moving out of the intergenerational households and establishing their independent households. The presence of their parents at the county scale also deters them from moving outside the county. These young adults seem to be bounded within the county by family ties. Besides, when they have siblings within the county, they are more likely to move outside the county than within the county; siblings near their parents may allow other siblings to move away for job and education opportunities, indicating a responsibility-sharing theory. For older adults who have young adult children but no living parents, they are more likely to move outside the county when their nearest adult child(ren) is outside the county, a strong implication of moving towards their adult children. For those who have both living parents and adult children, they are more likely to stay put or to move locally within the county, rather than moving out the county, when their parents are at the county scale. Family Geography distance Welfare regime Residential mobility Modernization Enthalten in Journal of housing and the built environment Springer Netherlands, 2000 38(2022), 3 vom: 14. Dez., Seite 1457-1489 (DE-627)317673394 (DE-600)2020687-2 (DE-576)9317673392 1566-4910 nnns volume:38 year:2022 number:3 day:14 month:12 pages:1457-1489 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09979-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC 56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines VZ 106423398 (DE-625)106423398 74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung VZ 106411039 (DE-625)106411039 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines VZ 106413708 (DE-625)106413708 56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur VZ 106421158 (DE-625)106421158 AR 38 2022 3 14 12 1457-1489 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Journal of housing and the built environment 38(2022), 3 vom: 14. Dez., Seite 1457-1489 volume:38 year:2022 number:3 day:14 month:12 pages:1457-1489 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of housing and the built environment 38(2022), 3 vom: 14. Dez., Seite 1457-1489 volume:38 year:2022 number:3 day:14 month:12 pages:1457-1489 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Family Geography distance Welfare regime Residential mobility Modernization |
| dewey-raw |
690 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Journal of housing and the built environment |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
He, Qiong @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-12-14T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
317673394 |
| dewey-sort |
3690 |
| id |
OLC2145332219 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2145332219</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240118103959.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240118s2022 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10901-022-09979-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2145332219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10901-022-09979-5-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">He, Qiong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-4753-4830</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Family, geographical distance and residential (im)mobility behaviour in China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This study investigates how the residential locations of extended family members influence residential (im)mobility behaviour in the urbanizing and industrializing context of China. It engages with how residential mobility as family adaptive strategies are structured by traditional family beliefs, welfare systems and structural modernization processes. For younger adults who have parents but no adult children, when they co-reside with their parents, they are more likely to move rather than staying put. But they usually move short distances within the county rather than outside the county. This mainly implies a process of moving out of the intergenerational households and establishing their independent households. The presence of their parents at the county scale also deters them from moving outside the county. These young adults seem to be bounded within the county by family ties. Besides, when they have siblings within the county, they are more likely to move outside the county than within the county; siblings near their parents may allow other siblings to move away for job and education opportunities, indicating a responsibility-sharing theory. For older adults who have young adult children but no living parents, they are more likely to move outside the county when their nearest adult child(ren) is outside the county, a strong implication of moving towards their adult children. For those who have both living parents and adult children, they are more likely to stay put or to move locally within the county, rather than moving out the county, when their parents are at the county scale.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Family</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geography distance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Welfare regime</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Residential mobility</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Modernization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of housing and the built environment</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 2000</subfield><subfield code="g">38(2022), 3 vom: 14. Dez., Seite 1457-1489</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)317673394</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2020687-2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)9317673392</subfield><subfield code="x">1566-4910</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:38</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:14</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1457-1489</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09979-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="0">106423398</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)106423398</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="0">106411039</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)106411039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="0">106413708</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)106413708</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="0">106421158</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)106421158</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">38</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">14</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">1457-1489</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
He, Qiong |
| spellingShingle |
He, Qiong ddc 690 bkl 56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines bkl 74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung bkl 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur misc Family misc Geography distance misc Welfare regime misc Residential mobility misc Modernization Family, geographical distance and residential (im)mobility behaviour in China |
| authorStr |
He, Qiong |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)317673394 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
690 - Buildings |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1566-4910 |
| topic_title |
690 VZ 56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines bkl 74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung bkl 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur bkl Family, geographical distance and residential (im)mobility behaviour in China Family Geography distance Welfare regime Residential mobility Modernization |
| topic |
ddc 690 bkl 56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines bkl 74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung bkl 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur misc Family misc Geography distance misc Welfare regime misc Residential mobility misc Modernization |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 690 bkl 56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines bkl 74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung bkl 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur misc Family misc Geography distance misc Welfare regime misc Residential mobility misc Modernization |
| topic_browse |
ddc 690 bkl 56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines bkl 74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung bkl 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur misc Family misc Geography distance misc Welfare regime misc Residential mobility misc Modernization |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of housing and the built environment |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
317673394 |
| dewey-tens |
690 - Building & construction |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of housing and the built environment |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)317673394 (DE-600)2020687-2 (DE-576)9317673392 |
| title |
Family, geographical distance and residential (im)mobility behaviour in China |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2145332219 (DE-He213)s10901-022-09979-5-p |
| title_full |
Family, geographical distance and residential (im)mobility behaviour in China |
| author_sort |
He, Qiong |
| journal |
Journal of housing and the built environment |
| journalStr |
Journal of housing and the built environment |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1457 |
| author_browse |
He, Qiong |
| container_volume |
38 |
| class |
690 VZ 56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines bkl 74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung bkl 74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines bkl 56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
He, Qiong |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10901-022-09979-5 |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0002-4753-4830 106423398 106411039 106413708 106421158 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0002-4753-4830 106423398 (DE-625)106423398 106411039 (DE-625)106411039 106413708 (DE-625)106413708 106421158 (DE-625)106421158 |
| dewey-full |
690 |
| title_sort |
family, geographical distance and residential (im)mobility behaviour in china |
| title_auth |
Family, geographical distance and residential (im)mobility behaviour in China |
| abstract |
Abstract This study investigates how the residential locations of extended family members influence residential (im)mobility behaviour in the urbanizing and industrializing context of China. It engages with how residential mobility as family adaptive strategies are structured by traditional family beliefs, welfare systems and structural modernization processes. For younger adults who have parents but no adult children, when they co-reside with their parents, they are more likely to move rather than staying put. But they usually move short distances within the county rather than outside the county. This mainly implies a process of moving out of the intergenerational households and establishing their independent households. The presence of their parents at the county scale also deters them from moving outside the county. These young adults seem to be bounded within the county by family ties. Besides, when they have siblings within the county, they are more likely to move outside the county than within the county; siblings near their parents may allow other siblings to move away for job and education opportunities, indicating a responsibility-sharing theory. For older adults who have young adult children but no living parents, they are more likely to move outside the county when their nearest adult child(ren) is outside the county, a strong implication of moving towards their adult children. For those who have both living parents and adult children, they are more likely to stay put or to move locally within the county, rather than moving out the county, when their parents are at the county scale. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
| abstractGer |
Abstract This study investigates how the residential locations of extended family members influence residential (im)mobility behaviour in the urbanizing and industrializing context of China. It engages with how residential mobility as family adaptive strategies are structured by traditional family beliefs, welfare systems and structural modernization processes. For younger adults who have parents but no adult children, when they co-reside with their parents, they are more likely to move rather than staying put. But they usually move short distances within the county rather than outside the county. This mainly implies a process of moving out of the intergenerational households and establishing their independent households. The presence of their parents at the county scale also deters them from moving outside the county. These young adults seem to be bounded within the county by family ties. Besides, when they have siblings within the county, they are more likely to move outside the county than within the county; siblings near their parents may allow other siblings to move away for job and education opportunities, indicating a responsibility-sharing theory. For older adults who have young adult children but no living parents, they are more likely to move outside the county when their nearest adult child(ren) is outside the county, a strong implication of moving towards their adult children. For those who have both living parents and adult children, they are more likely to stay put or to move locally within the county, rather than moving out the county, when their parents are at the county scale. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract This study investigates how the residential locations of extended family members influence residential (im)mobility behaviour in the urbanizing and industrializing context of China. It engages with how residential mobility as family adaptive strategies are structured by traditional family beliefs, welfare systems and structural modernization processes. For younger adults who have parents but no adult children, when they co-reside with their parents, they are more likely to move rather than staying put. But they usually move short distances within the county rather than outside the county. This mainly implies a process of moving out of the intergenerational households and establishing their independent households. The presence of their parents at the county scale also deters them from moving outside the county. These young adults seem to be bounded within the county by family ties. Besides, when they have siblings within the county, they are more likely to move outside the county than within the county; siblings near their parents may allow other siblings to move away for job and education opportunities, indicating a responsibility-sharing theory. For older adults who have young adult children but no living parents, they are more likely to move outside the county when their nearest adult child(ren) is outside the county, a strong implication of moving towards their adult children. For those who have both living parents and adult children, they are more likely to stay put or to move locally within the county, rather than moving out the county, when their parents are at the county scale. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Family, geographical distance and residential (im)mobility behaviour in China |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09979-5 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
317673394 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10901-022-09979-5 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T02:47:03.049Z |
| _version_ |
1803614917020876800 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2145332219</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240118103959.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240118s2022 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10901-022-09979-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2145332219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10901-022-09979-5-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">He, Qiong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-4753-4830</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Family, geographical distance and residential (im)mobility behaviour in China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This study investigates how the residential locations of extended family members influence residential (im)mobility behaviour in the urbanizing and industrializing context of China. It engages with how residential mobility as family adaptive strategies are structured by traditional family beliefs, welfare systems and structural modernization processes. For younger adults who have parents but no adult children, when they co-reside with their parents, they are more likely to move rather than staying put. But they usually move short distances within the county rather than outside the county. This mainly implies a process of moving out of the intergenerational households and establishing their independent households. The presence of their parents at the county scale also deters them from moving outside the county. These young adults seem to be bounded within the county by family ties. Besides, when they have siblings within the county, they are more likely to move outside the county than within the county; siblings near their parents may allow other siblings to move away for job and education opportunities, indicating a responsibility-sharing theory. For older adults who have young adult children but no living parents, they are more likely to move outside the county when their nearest adult child(ren) is outside the county, a strong implication of moving towards their adult children. For those who have both living parents and adult children, they are more likely to stay put or to move locally within the county, rather than moving out the county, when their parents are at the county scale.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Family</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geography distance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Welfare regime</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Residential mobility</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Modernization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of housing and the built environment</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 2000</subfield><subfield code="g">38(2022), 3 vom: 14. Dez., Seite 1457-1489</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)317673394</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2020687-2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)9317673392</subfield><subfield code="x">1566-4910</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:38</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:14</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1457-1489</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09979-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="0">106423398</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)106423398</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="0">106411039</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)106411039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="0">106413708</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)106413708</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="0">106421158</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)106421158</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">38</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">14</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">1457-1489</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4019136 |