Inner dialogues: Negotiations unfolding between the field and one's desk
This article is concerned with the inner dialogues around ethical dilemmas and concerns which unfold somewhere between the field and one's desk. It engages self-reflexively with how the subject of research is intimately connected with particular forms of representation and posits that it is esp...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Riedke, Eva [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Unbestimmt |
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: EthnoScripts - Hamburg : Inst. für Ethnologie der Univ. Hamburg, 1999, 23(2021), 1, Seite 45-58 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:23 ; year:2021 ; number:1 ; pages:45-58 |
| DOI / URN: |
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:18-8-16629 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2145799818 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2145799818 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20241009121028.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 240722s2021 xx ||||| 00| ||und c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:18-8-16629 |2 urn | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2145799818 | ||
| 035 | |a (OLC)ER98900036v23j2021a1p45-58 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a und | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 390 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 10 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Riedke, Eva |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Inner dialogues: Negotiations unfolding between the field and one's desk |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article is concerned with the inner dialogues around ethical dilemmas and concerns which unfold somewhere between the field and one's desk. It engages self-reflexively with how the subject of research is intimately connected with particular forms of representation and posits that it is especially ethnographic research on violence that renders the inherent premises and (com)promises of representation acutely tangible. Only seldom does the ethnographic story begin and end with the arrival and departure from the field. It is rather the case that the decision 'about how to write' does not develop linearly, is subject to shifts, and is often radically decentred at different points in time. In this article, I draw on my PhD research, conducted on the outskirts of Durban, South Africa, in which I became caught up in a series of hitman killings. When two of my main interlocutors were arrested for murder, I was confronted with the demand to make my ethnographic material available for the forthcoming trial. Taking this case as point of departure, I argue that, whilst significant efforts have been made to unravel the ethical tensions that define the everyday practice of doing field research, comparatively little conceptual work is available that engages with the nature of what we are doing when we write, the significance of ethical decision making therein, and how these unfold, leaving it to be something of a black box within research practice. [Ethnography, writing, discomforts, uncomfortable reflexivity, ethical moments, South Africa] | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Südafrika |0 (DE-588)4078012-0 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Feldforschung |0 (DE-588)4016674-0 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethnologie |0 (DE-588)4078931-7 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Schreiben |0 (DE-588)4116418-0 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Textproduktion |0 (DE-588)4184945-0 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Forschungsergebnis |0 (DE-588)4136104-0 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Forschungsdaten |0 (DE-588)1098579690 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Wissenschaftsethik |0 (DE-588)4066602-5 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Unbehagen |0 (DE-588)4229519-1 | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t EthnoScripts |d Hamburg : Inst. für Ethnologie der Univ. Hamburg, 1999 |g 23(2021), 1, Seite 45-58 |w (DE-627)313037558 |w (DE-600)2012906-3 |w (DE-576)110351142 |x 1438-5244 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:23 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g pages:45-58 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-ETH | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-HSW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-ANG | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_283 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 23 |j 2021 |e 1 |h 45-58 | ||
| author_variant |
e r er |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:14385244:2021----::nedaouseoitosnodnbtenh |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| allfields |
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:18-8-16629 urn (DE-627)OLC2145799818 (OLC)ER98900036v23j2021a1p45-58 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb und 390 VZ 10 ssgn Riedke, Eva verfasserin aut Inner dialogues: Negotiations unfolding between the field and one's desk 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This article is concerned with the inner dialogues around ethical dilemmas and concerns which unfold somewhere between the field and one's desk. It engages self-reflexively with how the subject of research is intimately connected with particular forms of representation and posits that it is especially ethnographic research on violence that renders the inherent premises and (com)promises of representation acutely tangible. Only seldom does the ethnographic story begin and end with the arrival and departure from the field. It is rather the case that the decision 'about how to write' does not develop linearly, is subject to shifts, and is often radically decentred at different points in time. In this article, I draw on my PhD research, conducted on the outskirts of Durban, South Africa, in which I became caught up in a series of hitman killings. When two of my main interlocutors were arrested for murder, I was confronted with the demand to make my ethnographic material available for the forthcoming trial. Taking this case as point of departure, I argue that, whilst significant efforts have been made to unravel the ethical tensions that define the everyday practice of doing field research, comparatively little conceptual work is available that engages with the nature of what we are doing when we write, the significance of ethical decision making therein, and how these unfold, leaving it to be something of a black box within research practice. [Ethnography, writing, discomforts, uncomfortable reflexivity, ethical moments, South Africa] Südafrika (DE-588)4078012-0 Feldforschung (DE-588)4016674-0 Ethnologie (DE-588)4078931-7 Schreiben (DE-588)4116418-0 Textproduktion (DE-588)4184945-0 Forschungsergebnis (DE-588)4136104-0 Forschungsdaten (DE-588)1098579690 Wissenschaftsethik (DE-588)4066602-5 Unbehagen (DE-588)4229519-1 Enthalten in EthnoScripts Hamburg : Inst. für Ethnologie der Univ. Hamburg, 1999 23(2021), 1, Seite 45-58 (DE-627)313037558 (DE-600)2012906-3 (DE-576)110351142 1438-5244 nnns volume:23 year:2021 number:1 pages:45-58 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-ETH SSG-OLC-HSW SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_283 AR 23 2021 1 45-58 |
| spelling |
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:18-8-16629 urn (DE-627)OLC2145799818 (OLC)ER98900036v23j2021a1p45-58 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb und 390 VZ 10 ssgn Riedke, Eva verfasserin aut Inner dialogues: Negotiations unfolding between the field and one's desk 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This article is concerned with the inner dialogues around ethical dilemmas and concerns which unfold somewhere between the field and one's desk. It engages self-reflexively with how the subject of research is intimately connected with particular forms of representation and posits that it is especially ethnographic research on violence that renders the inherent premises and (com)promises of representation acutely tangible. Only seldom does the ethnographic story begin and end with the arrival and departure from the field. It is rather the case that the decision 'about how to write' does not develop linearly, is subject to shifts, and is often radically decentred at different points in time. In this article, I draw on my PhD research, conducted on the outskirts of Durban, South Africa, in which I became caught up in a series of hitman killings. When two of my main interlocutors were arrested for murder, I was confronted with the demand to make my ethnographic material available for the forthcoming trial. Taking this case as point of departure, I argue that, whilst significant efforts have been made to unravel the ethical tensions that define the everyday practice of doing field research, comparatively little conceptual work is available that engages with the nature of what we are doing when we write, the significance of ethical decision making therein, and how these unfold, leaving it to be something of a black box within research practice. [Ethnography, writing, discomforts, uncomfortable reflexivity, ethical moments, South Africa] Südafrika (DE-588)4078012-0 Feldforschung (DE-588)4016674-0 Ethnologie (DE-588)4078931-7 Schreiben (DE-588)4116418-0 Textproduktion (DE-588)4184945-0 Forschungsergebnis (DE-588)4136104-0 Forschungsdaten (DE-588)1098579690 Wissenschaftsethik (DE-588)4066602-5 Unbehagen (DE-588)4229519-1 Enthalten in EthnoScripts Hamburg : Inst. für Ethnologie der Univ. Hamburg, 1999 23(2021), 1, Seite 45-58 (DE-627)313037558 (DE-600)2012906-3 (DE-576)110351142 1438-5244 nnns volume:23 year:2021 number:1 pages:45-58 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-ETH SSG-OLC-HSW SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_283 AR 23 2021 1 45-58 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:18-8-16629 urn (DE-627)OLC2145799818 (OLC)ER98900036v23j2021a1p45-58 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb und 390 VZ 10 ssgn Riedke, Eva verfasserin aut Inner dialogues: Negotiations unfolding between the field and one's desk 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This article is concerned with the inner dialogues around ethical dilemmas and concerns which unfold somewhere between the field and one's desk. It engages self-reflexively with how the subject of research is intimately connected with particular forms of representation and posits that it is especially ethnographic research on violence that renders the inherent premises and (com)promises of representation acutely tangible. Only seldom does the ethnographic story begin and end with the arrival and departure from the field. It is rather the case that the decision 'about how to write' does not develop linearly, is subject to shifts, and is often radically decentred at different points in time. In this article, I draw on my PhD research, conducted on the outskirts of Durban, South Africa, in which I became caught up in a series of hitman killings. When two of my main interlocutors were arrested for murder, I was confronted with the demand to make my ethnographic material available for the forthcoming trial. Taking this case as point of departure, I argue that, whilst significant efforts have been made to unravel the ethical tensions that define the everyday practice of doing field research, comparatively little conceptual work is available that engages with the nature of what we are doing when we write, the significance of ethical decision making therein, and how these unfold, leaving it to be something of a black box within research practice. [Ethnography, writing, discomforts, uncomfortable reflexivity, ethical moments, South Africa] Südafrika (DE-588)4078012-0 Feldforschung (DE-588)4016674-0 Ethnologie (DE-588)4078931-7 Schreiben (DE-588)4116418-0 Textproduktion (DE-588)4184945-0 Forschungsergebnis (DE-588)4136104-0 Forschungsdaten (DE-588)1098579690 Wissenschaftsethik (DE-588)4066602-5 Unbehagen (DE-588)4229519-1 Enthalten in EthnoScripts Hamburg : Inst. für Ethnologie der Univ. Hamburg, 1999 23(2021), 1, Seite 45-58 (DE-627)313037558 (DE-600)2012906-3 (DE-576)110351142 1438-5244 nnns volume:23 year:2021 number:1 pages:45-58 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-ETH SSG-OLC-HSW SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_283 AR 23 2021 1 45-58 |
| allfieldsGer |
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:18-8-16629 urn (DE-627)OLC2145799818 (OLC)ER98900036v23j2021a1p45-58 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb und 390 VZ 10 ssgn Riedke, Eva verfasserin aut Inner dialogues: Negotiations unfolding between the field and one's desk 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This article is concerned with the inner dialogues around ethical dilemmas and concerns which unfold somewhere between the field and one's desk. It engages self-reflexively with how the subject of research is intimately connected with particular forms of representation and posits that it is especially ethnographic research on violence that renders the inherent premises and (com)promises of representation acutely tangible. Only seldom does the ethnographic story begin and end with the arrival and departure from the field. It is rather the case that the decision 'about how to write' does not develop linearly, is subject to shifts, and is often radically decentred at different points in time. In this article, I draw on my PhD research, conducted on the outskirts of Durban, South Africa, in which I became caught up in a series of hitman killings. When two of my main interlocutors were arrested for murder, I was confronted with the demand to make my ethnographic material available for the forthcoming trial. Taking this case as point of departure, I argue that, whilst significant efforts have been made to unravel the ethical tensions that define the everyday practice of doing field research, comparatively little conceptual work is available that engages with the nature of what we are doing when we write, the significance of ethical decision making therein, and how these unfold, leaving it to be something of a black box within research practice. [Ethnography, writing, discomforts, uncomfortable reflexivity, ethical moments, South Africa] Südafrika (DE-588)4078012-0 Feldforschung (DE-588)4016674-0 Ethnologie (DE-588)4078931-7 Schreiben (DE-588)4116418-0 Textproduktion (DE-588)4184945-0 Forschungsergebnis (DE-588)4136104-0 Forschungsdaten (DE-588)1098579690 Wissenschaftsethik (DE-588)4066602-5 Unbehagen (DE-588)4229519-1 Enthalten in EthnoScripts Hamburg : Inst. für Ethnologie der Univ. Hamburg, 1999 23(2021), 1, Seite 45-58 (DE-627)313037558 (DE-600)2012906-3 (DE-576)110351142 1438-5244 nnns volume:23 year:2021 number:1 pages:45-58 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-ETH SSG-OLC-HSW SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_283 AR 23 2021 1 45-58 |
| allfieldsSound |
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:18-8-16629 urn (DE-627)OLC2145799818 (OLC)ER98900036v23j2021a1p45-58 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb und 390 VZ 10 ssgn Riedke, Eva verfasserin aut Inner dialogues: Negotiations unfolding between the field and one's desk 2021 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This article is concerned with the inner dialogues around ethical dilemmas and concerns which unfold somewhere between the field and one's desk. It engages self-reflexively with how the subject of research is intimately connected with particular forms of representation and posits that it is especially ethnographic research on violence that renders the inherent premises and (com)promises of representation acutely tangible. Only seldom does the ethnographic story begin and end with the arrival and departure from the field. It is rather the case that the decision 'about how to write' does not develop linearly, is subject to shifts, and is often radically decentred at different points in time. In this article, I draw on my PhD research, conducted on the outskirts of Durban, South Africa, in which I became caught up in a series of hitman killings. When two of my main interlocutors were arrested for murder, I was confronted with the demand to make my ethnographic material available for the forthcoming trial. Taking this case as point of departure, I argue that, whilst significant efforts have been made to unravel the ethical tensions that define the everyday practice of doing field research, comparatively little conceptual work is available that engages with the nature of what we are doing when we write, the significance of ethical decision making therein, and how these unfold, leaving it to be something of a black box within research practice. [Ethnography, writing, discomforts, uncomfortable reflexivity, ethical moments, South Africa] Südafrika (DE-588)4078012-0 Feldforschung (DE-588)4016674-0 Ethnologie (DE-588)4078931-7 Schreiben (DE-588)4116418-0 Textproduktion (DE-588)4184945-0 Forschungsergebnis (DE-588)4136104-0 Forschungsdaten (DE-588)1098579690 Wissenschaftsethik (DE-588)4066602-5 Unbehagen (DE-588)4229519-1 Enthalten in EthnoScripts Hamburg : Inst. für Ethnologie der Univ. Hamburg, 1999 23(2021), 1, Seite 45-58 (DE-627)313037558 (DE-600)2012906-3 (DE-576)110351142 1438-5244 nnns volume:23 year:2021 number:1 pages:45-58 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-ETH SSG-OLC-HSW SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_283 AR 23 2021 1 45-58 |
| language |
Undetermined |
| source |
Enthalten in EthnoScripts 23(2021), 1, Seite 45-58 volume:23 year:2021 number:1 pages:45-58 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in EthnoScripts 23(2021), 1, Seite 45-58 volume:23 year:2021 number:1 pages:45-58 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Südafrika Feldforschung Ethnologie Schreiben Textproduktion Forschungsergebnis Forschungsdaten Wissenschaftsethik Unbehagen |
| dewey-raw |
390 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
EthnoScripts |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Riedke, Eva @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
313037558 |
| dewey-sort |
3390 |
| id |
OLC2145799818 |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2145799818</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241009121028.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240722s2021 xx ||||| 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:18-8-16629</subfield><subfield code="2">urn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2145799818</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OLC)ER98900036v23j2021a1p45-58</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">und</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">390</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Riedke, Eva</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Inner dialogues: Negotiations unfolding between the field and one's desk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article is concerned with the inner dialogues around ethical dilemmas and concerns which unfold somewhere between the field and one's desk. It engages self-reflexively with how the subject of research is intimately connected with particular forms of representation and posits that it is especially ethnographic research on violence that renders the inherent premises and (com)promises of representation acutely tangible. Only seldom does the ethnographic story begin and end with the arrival and departure from the field. It is rather the case that the decision 'about how to write' does not develop linearly, is subject to shifts, and is often radically decentred at different points in time. In this article, I draw on my PhD research, conducted on the outskirts of Durban, South Africa, in which I became caught up in a series of hitman killings. When two of my main interlocutors were arrested for murder, I was confronted with the demand to make my ethnographic material available for the forthcoming trial. Taking this case as point of departure, I argue that, whilst significant efforts have been made to unravel the ethical tensions that define the everyday practice of doing field research, comparatively little conceptual work is available that engages with the nature of what we are doing when we write, the significance of ethical decision making therein, and how these unfold, leaving it to be something of a black box within research practice. [Ethnography, writing, discomforts, uncomfortable reflexivity, ethical moments, South Africa]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Südafrika</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078012-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Feldforschung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4016674-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethnologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078931-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Schreiben</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4116418-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Textproduktion</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4184945-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Forschungsergebnis</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4136104-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Forschungsdaten</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1098579690</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wissenschaftsethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066602-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Unbehagen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4229519-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">EthnoScripts</subfield><subfield code="d">Hamburg : Inst. für Ethnologie der Univ. Hamburg, 1999</subfield><subfield code="g">23(2021), 1, Seite 45-58</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)313037558</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2012906-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)110351142</subfield><subfield code="x">1438-5244</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:23</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:45-58</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ETH</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-HSW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-ANG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_283</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">23</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">45-58</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Riedke, Eva |
| spellingShingle |
Riedke, Eva ddc 390 ssgn 10 misc Südafrika misc Feldforschung misc Ethnologie misc Schreiben misc Textproduktion misc Forschungsergebnis misc Forschungsdaten misc Wissenschaftsethik misc Unbehagen Inner dialogues: Negotiations unfolding between the field and one's desk |
| authorStr |
Riedke, Eva |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)313037558 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
390 - Customs, etiquette & folklore |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1438-5244 |
| topic_title |
390 VZ 10 ssgn Inner dialogues: Negotiations unfolding between the field and one's desk Südafrika (DE-588)4078012-0 Feldforschung (DE-588)4016674-0 Ethnologie (DE-588)4078931-7 Schreiben (DE-588)4116418-0 Textproduktion (DE-588)4184945-0 Forschungsergebnis (DE-588)4136104-0 Forschungsdaten (DE-588)1098579690 Wissenschaftsethik (DE-588)4066602-5 Unbehagen (DE-588)4229519-1 |
| topic |
ddc 390 ssgn 10 misc Südafrika misc Feldforschung misc Ethnologie misc Schreiben misc Textproduktion misc Forschungsergebnis misc Forschungsdaten misc Wissenschaftsethik misc Unbehagen |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 390 ssgn 10 misc Südafrika misc Feldforschung misc Ethnologie misc Schreiben misc Textproduktion misc Forschungsergebnis misc Forschungsdaten misc Wissenschaftsethik misc Unbehagen |
| topic_browse |
ddc 390 ssgn 10 misc Südafrika misc Feldforschung misc Ethnologie misc Schreiben misc Textproduktion misc Forschungsergebnis misc Forschungsdaten misc Wissenschaftsethik misc Unbehagen |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
EthnoScripts |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
313037558 |
| dewey-tens |
390 - Customs, etiquette & folklore |
| hierarchy_top_title |
EthnoScripts |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)313037558 (DE-600)2012906-3 (DE-576)110351142 |
| normlinkwithrole_str_mv |
(DE-588)4078012-0@@650@@ (DE-588)4016674-0@@650@@ (DE-588)4078931-7@@650@@ (DE-588)4116418-0@@650@@ (DE-588)4184945-0@@650@@ (DE-588)4136104-0@@650@@ (DE-588)1098579690@@650@@ (DE-588)4066602-5@@650@@ (DE-588)4229519-1@@650@@ |
| title |
Inner dialogues: Negotiations unfolding between the field and one's desk |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2145799818 (OLC)ER98900036v23j2021a1p45-58 |
| title_full |
Inner dialogues: Negotiations unfolding between the field and one's desk |
| author_sort |
Riedke, Eva |
| journal |
EthnoScripts |
| journalStr |
EthnoScripts |
| lang_code |
und |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
45 |
| author_browse |
Riedke, Eva |
| container_volume |
23 |
| class |
390 VZ 10 ssgn |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Riedke, Eva |
| normlink |
4078012-0 4016674-0 4078931-7 4116418-0 4184945-0 4136104-0 1098579690 4066602-5 4229519-1 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(DE-588)4078012-0 (DE-588)4016674-0 (DE-588)4078931-7 (DE-588)4116418-0 (DE-588)4184945-0 (DE-588)4136104-0 (DE-588)1098579690 (DE-588)4066602-5 (DE-588)4229519-1 |
| dewey-full |
390 |
| title_sort |
inner dialogues: negotiations unfolding between the field and one's desk |
| title_auth |
Inner dialogues: Negotiations unfolding between the field and one's desk |
| abstract |
This article is concerned with the inner dialogues around ethical dilemmas and concerns which unfold somewhere between the field and one's desk. It engages self-reflexively with how the subject of research is intimately connected with particular forms of representation and posits that it is especially ethnographic research on violence that renders the inherent premises and (com)promises of representation acutely tangible. Only seldom does the ethnographic story begin and end with the arrival and departure from the field. It is rather the case that the decision 'about how to write' does not develop linearly, is subject to shifts, and is often radically decentred at different points in time. In this article, I draw on my PhD research, conducted on the outskirts of Durban, South Africa, in which I became caught up in a series of hitman killings. When two of my main interlocutors were arrested for murder, I was confronted with the demand to make my ethnographic material available for the forthcoming trial. Taking this case as point of departure, I argue that, whilst significant efforts have been made to unravel the ethical tensions that define the everyday practice of doing field research, comparatively little conceptual work is available that engages with the nature of what we are doing when we write, the significance of ethical decision making therein, and how these unfold, leaving it to be something of a black box within research practice. [Ethnography, writing, discomforts, uncomfortable reflexivity, ethical moments, South Africa] |
| abstractGer |
This article is concerned with the inner dialogues around ethical dilemmas and concerns which unfold somewhere between the field and one's desk. It engages self-reflexively with how the subject of research is intimately connected with particular forms of representation and posits that it is especially ethnographic research on violence that renders the inherent premises and (com)promises of representation acutely tangible. Only seldom does the ethnographic story begin and end with the arrival and departure from the field. It is rather the case that the decision 'about how to write' does not develop linearly, is subject to shifts, and is often radically decentred at different points in time. In this article, I draw on my PhD research, conducted on the outskirts of Durban, South Africa, in which I became caught up in a series of hitman killings. When two of my main interlocutors were arrested for murder, I was confronted with the demand to make my ethnographic material available for the forthcoming trial. Taking this case as point of departure, I argue that, whilst significant efforts have been made to unravel the ethical tensions that define the everyday practice of doing field research, comparatively little conceptual work is available that engages with the nature of what we are doing when we write, the significance of ethical decision making therein, and how these unfold, leaving it to be something of a black box within research practice. [Ethnography, writing, discomforts, uncomfortable reflexivity, ethical moments, South Africa] |
| abstract_unstemmed |
This article is concerned with the inner dialogues around ethical dilemmas and concerns which unfold somewhere between the field and one's desk. It engages self-reflexively with how the subject of research is intimately connected with particular forms of representation and posits that it is especially ethnographic research on violence that renders the inherent premises and (com)promises of representation acutely tangible. Only seldom does the ethnographic story begin and end with the arrival and departure from the field. It is rather the case that the decision 'about how to write' does not develop linearly, is subject to shifts, and is often radically decentred at different points in time. In this article, I draw on my PhD research, conducted on the outskirts of Durban, South Africa, in which I became caught up in a series of hitman killings. When two of my main interlocutors were arrested for murder, I was confronted with the demand to make my ethnographic material available for the forthcoming trial. Taking this case as point of departure, I argue that, whilst significant efforts have been made to unravel the ethical tensions that define the everyday practice of doing field research, comparatively little conceptual work is available that engages with the nature of what we are doing when we write, the significance of ethical decision making therein, and how these unfold, leaving it to be something of a black box within research practice. [Ethnography, writing, discomforts, uncomfortable reflexivity, ethical moments, South Africa] |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-ETH SSG-OLC-HSW SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_283 |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Inner dialogues: Negotiations unfolding between the field and one's desk |
| rolewithnormlink_str_mv |
@@650@@(DE-588)4078012-0 @@650@@(DE-588)4016674-0 @@650@@(DE-588)4078931-7 @@650@@(DE-588)4116418-0 @@650@@(DE-588)4184945-0 @@650@@(DE-588)4136104-0 @@650@@(DE-588)1098579690 @@650@@(DE-588)4066602-5 @@650@@(DE-588)4229519-1 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
313037558 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| up_date |
2024-10-09T23:08:22.486Z |
| _version_ |
1812479661821657088 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2145799818</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241009121028.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240722s2021 xx ||||| 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:18-8-16629</subfield><subfield code="2">urn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2145799818</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OLC)ER98900036v23j2021a1p45-58</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">und</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">390</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Riedke, Eva</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Inner dialogues: Negotiations unfolding between the field and one's desk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article is concerned with the inner dialogues around ethical dilemmas and concerns which unfold somewhere between the field and one's desk. It engages self-reflexively with how the subject of research is intimately connected with particular forms of representation and posits that it is especially ethnographic research on violence that renders the inherent premises and (com)promises of representation acutely tangible. Only seldom does the ethnographic story begin and end with the arrival and departure from the field. It is rather the case that the decision 'about how to write' does not develop linearly, is subject to shifts, and is often radically decentred at different points in time. In this article, I draw on my PhD research, conducted on the outskirts of Durban, South Africa, in which I became caught up in a series of hitman killings. When two of my main interlocutors were arrested for murder, I was confronted with the demand to make my ethnographic material available for the forthcoming trial. Taking this case as point of departure, I argue that, whilst significant efforts have been made to unravel the ethical tensions that define the everyday practice of doing field research, comparatively little conceptual work is available that engages with the nature of what we are doing when we write, the significance of ethical decision making therein, and how these unfold, leaving it to be something of a black box within research practice. [Ethnography, writing, discomforts, uncomfortable reflexivity, ethical moments, South Africa]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Südafrika</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078012-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Feldforschung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4016674-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethnologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078931-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Schreiben</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4116418-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Textproduktion</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4184945-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Forschungsergebnis</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4136104-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Forschungsdaten</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1098579690</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wissenschaftsethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066602-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Unbehagen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4229519-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">EthnoScripts</subfield><subfield code="d">Hamburg : Inst. für Ethnologie der Univ. Hamburg, 1999</subfield><subfield code="g">23(2021), 1, Seite 45-58</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)313037558</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2012906-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)110351142</subfield><subfield code="x">1438-5244</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:23</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:45-58</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ETH</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-HSW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-ANG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_283</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">23</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">45-58</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.0139503 |