Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims

Abstract Consider the following nine rules for adjudicating conflicting claims: the proportional, constrained equal awards, constrained equal losses, Talmud, Piniles’, constrained egalitarian, adjusted proportional, random arrival, and minimal overlap rules. For each pair of rules in this list, we e...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Autor*in:

Bosmans, Kristof [verfasserIn]

Lauwers, Luc

Format:

E-Artikel

Sprache:

Englisch

Erschienen:

2011

Schlagwörter:

Claims problem

Bankruptcy

Taxation

Lorenz dominance

Proportional rule

Constrained equal awards rule

Constrained equal losses rule

Talmud rule

Piniles’ rule

Constrained egalitarian rule

Adjusted proportional rule

Random arrival rule

Minimal overlap rule

Anmerkung:

© The Author(s) 2011

Übergeordnetes Werk:

Enthalten in: International journal of game theory - Berlin : Springer, 1971, 40(2011), 4 vom: 05. Jan., Seite 791-807

Übergeordnetes Werk:

volume:40 ; year:2011 ; number:4 ; day:05 ; month:01 ; pages:791-807

Links:

Volltext

DOI / URN:

10.1007/s00182-010-0269-z

Katalog-ID:

SPR001543563

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!