Withdrawal from continuous amphetamine administration abolishes latent inhibition but leaves prepulse inhibition intact
Rationale Schizophrenia has been associated with dysregulation of dopamine (DA) transmission and impairment in a number of experimental tasks, including sensorimotor gating assessed using prepulse inhibition (PPI) and selective attention assessed using latent inhibition (LI). We have demonstrated in...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Peleg-Raibstein, Daria [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2006 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer-Verlag 2006 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Psychopharmacology - Berlin : Springer, 1959, 185(2006), 2 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 226-239 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:185 ; year:2006 ; number:2 ; day:10 ; month:02 ; pages:226-239 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s00213-005-0286-y |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR001998722 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR001998722 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230519193659.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201001s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00213-005-0286-y |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR001998722 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s00213-005-0286-y-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Peleg-Raibstein, Daria |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Withdrawal from continuous amphetamine administration abolishes latent inhibition but leaves prepulse inhibition intact |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2006 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer-Verlag 2006 | ||
| 520 | |a Rationale Schizophrenia has been associated with dysregulation of dopamine (DA) transmission and impairment in a number of experimental tasks, including sensorimotor gating assessed using prepulse inhibition (PPI) and selective attention assessed using latent inhibition (LI). We have demonstrated in previous studies that after withdrawal from escalating (ESC) dosages of amphetamine (AMPH), animals exhibited disruption of LI but no alteration of PPI. Moreover, these animals always showed behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge. Objective In this study, we were interested in testing whether a different administration schedule would elicit disruption of both LI and PPI. Methods Animals were treated with continuous AMPH release (via osmotic mini-pumps at a dosage of 10 mg $ kg^{−1} $ $ day^{−1} $ for 7 days) and tested for their performance in L and PPI during withdrawal in a drug free state. Rats received AMPH treatment during the induction phase in their home cages or in the activity chambers. Following withdrawal, the expression of behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge was tested in both cases in the activity chambers. Results Animals pretreated with AMPH from both groups did not exhibit behavioural sensitization. Withdrawal from continuous administration induced LI attenuation with no effect on PPI. Conclusions These findings are similar to what was previously found with respect to an ESC AMPH regime. The only difference between the schedules was that the ESC AMPH schedule led to behavioural sensitization whereas the continuous AMPH did not. It is suggested that the expression of sensitization may not be a prerequisite for observed LI disruption. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Latent inhibition |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Prepulse inhibition |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Withdrawal |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Amphetamine |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sensitization |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rat |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Schizophrenia |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sydekum, Esther |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Russig, Holger |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Feldon, Joram |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Psychopharmacology |d Berlin : Springer, 1959 |g 185(2006), 2 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 226-239 |w (DE-627)341342254 |w (DE-600)2066933-1 |x 1432-2072 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:185 |g year:2006 |g number:2 |g day:10 |g month:02 |g pages:226-239 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-0286-y |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_101 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_138 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_171 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_250 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_267 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_281 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_636 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2031 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2039 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2057 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2070 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2086 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2093 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2106 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2107 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2108 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2116 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2119 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2144 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2188 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2446 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2472 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2548 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4246 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4328 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4336 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 185 |j 2006 |e 2 |b 10 |c 02 |h 226-239 | ||
| author_variant |
d p r dpr e s es h r hr j f jf |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:14322072:2006----::ihrwlrmotnosmhtmnamnsrtoaoihsaetniiinul |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2006 |
| publishDate |
2006 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s00213-005-0286-y doi (DE-627)SPR001998722 (SPR)s00213-005-0286-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Peleg-Raibstein, Daria verfasserin aut Withdrawal from continuous amphetamine administration abolishes latent inhibition but leaves prepulse inhibition intact 2006 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag 2006 Rationale Schizophrenia has been associated with dysregulation of dopamine (DA) transmission and impairment in a number of experimental tasks, including sensorimotor gating assessed using prepulse inhibition (PPI) and selective attention assessed using latent inhibition (LI). We have demonstrated in previous studies that after withdrawal from escalating (ESC) dosages of amphetamine (AMPH), animals exhibited disruption of LI but no alteration of PPI. Moreover, these animals always showed behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge. Objective In this study, we were interested in testing whether a different administration schedule would elicit disruption of both LI and PPI. Methods Animals were treated with continuous AMPH release (via osmotic mini-pumps at a dosage of 10 mg $ kg^{−1} $ $ day^{−1} $ for 7 days) and tested for their performance in L and PPI during withdrawal in a drug free state. Rats received AMPH treatment during the induction phase in their home cages or in the activity chambers. Following withdrawal, the expression of behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge was tested in both cases in the activity chambers. Results Animals pretreated with AMPH from both groups did not exhibit behavioural sensitization. Withdrawal from continuous administration induced LI attenuation with no effect on PPI. Conclusions These findings are similar to what was previously found with respect to an ESC AMPH regime. The only difference between the schedules was that the ESC AMPH schedule led to behavioural sensitization whereas the continuous AMPH did not. It is suggested that the expression of sensitization may not be a prerequisite for observed LI disruption. Latent inhibition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Prepulse inhibition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Withdrawal (dpeaa)DE-He213 Amphetamine (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sensitization (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rat (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schizophrenia (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sydekum, Esther aut Russig, Holger aut Feldon, Joram aut Enthalten in Psychopharmacology Berlin : Springer, 1959 185(2006), 2 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 226-239 (DE-627)341342254 (DE-600)2066933-1 1432-2072 nnns volume:185 year:2006 number:2 day:10 month:02 pages:226-239 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-0286-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 185 2006 2 10 02 226-239 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s00213-005-0286-y doi (DE-627)SPR001998722 (SPR)s00213-005-0286-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Peleg-Raibstein, Daria verfasserin aut Withdrawal from continuous amphetamine administration abolishes latent inhibition but leaves prepulse inhibition intact 2006 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag 2006 Rationale Schizophrenia has been associated with dysregulation of dopamine (DA) transmission and impairment in a number of experimental tasks, including sensorimotor gating assessed using prepulse inhibition (PPI) and selective attention assessed using latent inhibition (LI). We have demonstrated in previous studies that after withdrawal from escalating (ESC) dosages of amphetamine (AMPH), animals exhibited disruption of LI but no alteration of PPI. Moreover, these animals always showed behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge. Objective In this study, we were interested in testing whether a different administration schedule would elicit disruption of both LI and PPI. Methods Animals were treated with continuous AMPH release (via osmotic mini-pumps at a dosage of 10 mg $ kg^{−1} $ $ day^{−1} $ for 7 days) and tested for their performance in L and PPI during withdrawal in a drug free state. Rats received AMPH treatment during the induction phase in their home cages or in the activity chambers. Following withdrawal, the expression of behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge was tested in both cases in the activity chambers. Results Animals pretreated with AMPH from both groups did not exhibit behavioural sensitization. Withdrawal from continuous administration induced LI attenuation with no effect on PPI. Conclusions These findings are similar to what was previously found with respect to an ESC AMPH regime. The only difference between the schedules was that the ESC AMPH schedule led to behavioural sensitization whereas the continuous AMPH did not. It is suggested that the expression of sensitization may not be a prerequisite for observed LI disruption. Latent inhibition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Prepulse inhibition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Withdrawal (dpeaa)DE-He213 Amphetamine (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sensitization (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rat (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schizophrenia (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sydekum, Esther aut Russig, Holger aut Feldon, Joram aut Enthalten in Psychopharmacology Berlin : Springer, 1959 185(2006), 2 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 226-239 (DE-627)341342254 (DE-600)2066933-1 1432-2072 nnns volume:185 year:2006 number:2 day:10 month:02 pages:226-239 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-0286-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 185 2006 2 10 02 226-239 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s00213-005-0286-y doi (DE-627)SPR001998722 (SPR)s00213-005-0286-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Peleg-Raibstein, Daria verfasserin aut Withdrawal from continuous amphetamine administration abolishes latent inhibition but leaves prepulse inhibition intact 2006 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag 2006 Rationale Schizophrenia has been associated with dysregulation of dopamine (DA) transmission and impairment in a number of experimental tasks, including sensorimotor gating assessed using prepulse inhibition (PPI) and selective attention assessed using latent inhibition (LI). We have demonstrated in previous studies that after withdrawal from escalating (ESC) dosages of amphetamine (AMPH), animals exhibited disruption of LI but no alteration of PPI. Moreover, these animals always showed behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge. Objective In this study, we were interested in testing whether a different administration schedule would elicit disruption of both LI and PPI. Methods Animals were treated with continuous AMPH release (via osmotic mini-pumps at a dosage of 10 mg $ kg^{−1} $ $ day^{−1} $ for 7 days) and tested for their performance in L and PPI during withdrawal in a drug free state. Rats received AMPH treatment during the induction phase in their home cages or in the activity chambers. Following withdrawal, the expression of behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge was tested in both cases in the activity chambers. Results Animals pretreated with AMPH from both groups did not exhibit behavioural sensitization. Withdrawal from continuous administration induced LI attenuation with no effect on PPI. Conclusions These findings are similar to what was previously found with respect to an ESC AMPH regime. The only difference between the schedules was that the ESC AMPH schedule led to behavioural sensitization whereas the continuous AMPH did not. It is suggested that the expression of sensitization may not be a prerequisite for observed LI disruption. Latent inhibition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Prepulse inhibition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Withdrawal (dpeaa)DE-He213 Amphetamine (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sensitization (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rat (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schizophrenia (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sydekum, Esther aut Russig, Holger aut Feldon, Joram aut Enthalten in Psychopharmacology Berlin : Springer, 1959 185(2006), 2 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 226-239 (DE-627)341342254 (DE-600)2066933-1 1432-2072 nnns volume:185 year:2006 number:2 day:10 month:02 pages:226-239 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-0286-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 185 2006 2 10 02 226-239 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s00213-005-0286-y doi (DE-627)SPR001998722 (SPR)s00213-005-0286-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Peleg-Raibstein, Daria verfasserin aut Withdrawal from continuous amphetamine administration abolishes latent inhibition but leaves prepulse inhibition intact 2006 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag 2006 Rationale Schizophrenia has been associated with dysregulation of dopamine (DA) transmission and impairment in a number of experimental tasks, including sensorimotor gating assessed using prepulse inhibition (PPI) and selective attention assessed using latent inhibition (LI). We have demonstrated in previous studies that after withdrawal from escalating (ESC) dosages of amphetamine (AMPH), animals exhibited disruption of LI but no alteration of PPI. Moreover, these animals always showed behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge. Objective In this study, we were interested in testing whether a different administration schedule would elicit disruption of both LI and PPI. Methods Animals were treated with continuous AMPH release (via osmotic mini-pumps at a dosage of 10 mg $ kg^{−1} $ $ day^{−1} $ for 7 days) and tested for their performance in L and PPI during withdrawal in a drug free state. Rats received AMPH treatment during the induction phase in their home cages or in the activity chambers. Following withdrawal, the expression of behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge was tested in both cases in the activity chambers. Results Animals pretreated with AMPH from both groups did not exhibit behavioural sensitization. Withdrawal from continuous administration induced LI attenuation with no effect on PPI. Conclusions These findings are similar to what was previously found with respect to an ESC AMPH regime. The only difference between the schedules was that the ESC AMPH schedule led to behavioural sensitization whereas the continuous AMPH did not. It is suggested that the expression of sensitization may not be a prerequisite for observed LI disruption. Latent inhibition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Prepulse inhibition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Withdrawal (dpeaa)DE-He213 Amphetamine (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sensitization (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rat (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schizophrenia (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sydekum, Esther aut Russig, Holger aut Feldon, Joram aut Enthalten in Psychopharmacology Berlin : Springer, 1959 185(2006), 2 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 226-239 (DE-627)341342254 (DE-600)2066933-1 1432-2072 nnns volume:185 year:2006 number:2 day:10 month:02 pages:226-239 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-0286-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 185 2006 2 10 02 226-239 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s00213-005-0286-y doi (DE-627)SPR001998722 (SPR)s00213-005-0286-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Peleg-Raibstein, Daria verfasserin aut Withdrawal from continuous amphetamine administration abolishes latent inhibition but leaves prepulse inhibition intact 2006 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag 2006 Rationale Schizophrenia has been associated with dysregulation of dopamine (DA) transmission and impairment in a number of experimental tasks, including sensorimotor gating assessed using prepulse inhibition (PPI) and selective attention assessed using latent inhibition (LI). We have demonstrated in previous studies that after withdrawal from escalating (ESC) dosages of amphetamine (AMPH), animals exhibited disruption of LI but no alteration of PPI. Moreover, these animals always showed behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge. Objective In this study, we were interested in testing whether a different administration schedule would elicit disruption of both LI and PPI. Methods Animals were treated with continuous AMPH release (via osmotic mini-pumps at a dosage of 10 mg $ kg^{−1} $ $ day^{−1} $ for 7 days) and tested for their performance in L and PPI during withdrawal in a drug free state. Rats received AMPH treatment during the induction phase in their home cages or in the activity chambers. Following withdrawal, the expression of behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge was tested in both cases in the activity chambers. Results Animals pretreated with AMPH from both groups did not exhibit behavioural sensitization. Withdrawal from continuous administration induced LI attenuation with no effect on PPI. Conclusions These findings are similar to what was previously found with respect to an ESC AMPH regime. The only difference between the schedules was that the ESC AMPH schedule led to behavioural sensitization whereas the continuous AMPH did not. It is suggested that the expression of sensitization may not be a prerequisite for observed LI disruption. Latent inhibition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Prepulse inhibition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Withdrawal (dpeaa)DE-He213 Amphetamine (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sensitization (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rat (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schizophrenia (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sydekum, Esther aut Russig, Holger aut Feldon, Joram aut Enthalten in Psychopharmacology Berlin : Springer, 1959 185(2006), 2 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 226-239 (DE-627)341342254 (DE-600)2066933-1 1432-2072 nnns volume:185 year:2006 number:2 day:10 month:02 pages:226-239 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-0286-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 185 2006 2 10 02 226-239 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Psychopharmacology 185(2006), 2 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 226-239 volume:185 year:2006 number:2 day:10 month:02 pages:226-239 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Psychopharmacology 185(2006), 2 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 226-239 volume:185 year:2006 number:2 day:10 month:02 pages:226-239 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Latent inhibition Prepulse inhibition Withdrawal Amphetamine Sensitization Rat Schizophrenia |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Psychopharmacology |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Peleg-Raibstein, Daria @@aut@@ Sydekum, Esther @@aut@@ Russig, Holger @@aut@@ Feldon, Joram @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2006-02-10T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
341342254 |
| id |
SPR001998722 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR001998722</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519193659.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201001s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00213-005-0286-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR001998722</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00213-005-0286-y-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Peleg-Raibstein, Daria</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Withdrawal from continuous amphetamine administration abolishes latent inhibition but leaves prepulse inhibition intact</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer-Verlag 2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rationale Schizophrenia has been associated with dysregulation of dopamine (DA) transmission and impairment in a number of experimental tasks, including sensorimotor gating assessed using prepulse inhibition (PPI) and selective attention assessed using latent inhibition (LI). We have demonstrated in previous studies that after withdrawal from escalating (ESC) dosages of amphetamine (AMPH), animals exhibited disruption of LI but no alteration of PPI. Moreover, these animals always showed behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge. Objective In this study, we were interested in testing whether a different administration schedule would elicit disruption of both LI and PPI. Methods Animals were treated with continuous AMPH release (via osmotic mini-pumps at a dosage of 10 mg $ kg^{−1} $ $ day^{−1} $ for 7 days) and tested for their performance in L and PPI during withdrawal in a drug free state. Rats received AMPH treatment during the induction phase in their home cages or in the activity chambers. Following withdrawal, the expression of behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge was tested in both cases in the activity chambers. Results Animals pretreated with AMPH from both groups did not exhibit behavioural sensitization. Withdrawal from continuous administration induced LI attenuation with no effect on PPI. Conclusions These findings are similar to what was previously found with respect to an ESC AMPH regime. The only difference between the schedules was that the ESC AMPH schedule led to behavioural sensitization whereas the continuous AMPH did not. It is suggested that the expression of sensitization may not be a prerequisite for observed LI disruption.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Latent inhibition</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Prepulse inhibition</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Withdrawal</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Amphetamine</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sensitization</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rat</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Schizophrenia</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sydekum, Esther</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Russig, Holger</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Feldon, Joram</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Psychopharmacology</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 1959</subfield><subfield code="g">185(2006), 2 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 226-239</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)341342254</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2066933-1</subfield><subfield code="x">1432-2072</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:185</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2006</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:10</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:226-239</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-0286-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2070</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">185</subfield><subfield code="j">2006</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">10</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">226-239</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Peleg-Raibstein, Daria |
| spellingShingle |
Peleg-Raibstein, Daria misc Latent inhibition misc Prepulse inhibition misc Withdrawal misc Amphetamine misc Sensitization misc Rat misc Schizophrenia Withdrawal from continuous amphetamine administration abolishes latent inhibition but leaves prepulse inhibition intact |
| authorStr |
Peleg-Raibstein, Daria |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)341342254 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1432-2072 |
| topic_title |
Withdrawal from continuous amphetamine administration abolishes latent inhibition but leaves prepulse inhibition intact Latent inhibition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Prepulse inhibition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Withdrawal (dpeaa)DE-He213 Amphetamine (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sensitization (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rat (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schizophrenia (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Latent inhibition misc Prepulse inhibition misc Withdrawal misc Amphetamine misc Sensitization misc Rat misc Schizophrenia |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Latent inhibition misc Prepulse inhibition misc Withdrawal misc Amphetamine misc Sensitization misc Rat misc Schizophrenia |
| topic_browse |
misc Latent inhibition misc Prepulse inhibition misc Withdrawal misc Amphetamine misc Sensitization misc Rat misc Schizophrenia |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Psychopharmacology |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
341342254 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Psychopharmacology |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)341342254 (DE-600)2066933-1 |
| title |
Withdrawal from continuous amphetamine administration abolishes latent inhibition but leaves prepulse inhibition intact |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR001998722 (SPR)s00213-005-0286-y-e |
| title_full |
Withdrawal from continuous amphetamine administration abolishes latent inhibition but leaves prepulse inhibition intact |
| author_sort |
Peleg-Raibstein, Daria |
| journal |
Psychopharmacology |
| journalStr |
Psychopharmacology |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2006 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
226 |
| author_browse |
Peleg-Raibstein, Daria Sydekum, Esther Russig, Holger Feldon, Joram |
| container_volume |
185 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Peleg-Raibstein, Daria |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s00213-005-0286-y |
| title_sort |
withdrawal from continuous amphetamine administration abolishes latent inhibition but leaves prepulse inhibition intact |
| title_auth |
Withdrawal from continuous amphetamine administration abolishes latent inhibition but leaves prepulse inhibition intact |
| abstract |
Rationale Schizophrenia has been associated with dysregulation of dopamine (DA) transmission and impairment in a number of experimental tasks, including sensorimotor gating assessed using prepulse inhibition (PPI) and selective attention assessed using latent inhibition (LI). We have demonstrated in previous studies that after withdrawal from escalating (ESC) dosages of amphetamine (AMPH), animals exhibited disruption of LI but no alteration of PPI. Moreover, these animals always showed behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge. Objective In this study, we were interested in testing whether a different administration schedule would elicit disruption of both LI and PPI. Methods Animals were treated with continuous AMPH release (via osmotic mini-pumps at a dosage of 10 mg $ kg^{−1} $ $ day^{−1} $ for 7 days) and tested for their performance in L and PPI during withdrawal in a drug free state. Rats received AMPH treatment during the induction phase in their home cages or in the activity chambers. Following withdrawal, the expression of behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge was tested in both cases in the activity chambers. Results Animals pretreated with AMPH from both groups did not exhibit behavioural sensitization. Withdrawal from continuous administration induced LI attenuation with no effect on PPI. Conclusions These findings are similar to what was previously found with respect to an ESC AMPH regime. The only difference between the schedules was that the ESC AMPH schedule led to behavioural sensitization whereas the continuous AMPH did not. It is suggested that the expression of sensitization may not be a prerequisite for observed LI disruption. © Springer-Verlag 2006 |
| abstractGer |
Rationale Schizophrenia has been associated with dysregulation of dopamine (DA) transmission and impairment in a number of experimental tasks, including sensorimotor gating assessed using prepulse inhibition (PPI) and selective attention assessed using latent inhibition (LI). We have demonstrated in previous studies that after withdrawal from escalating (ESC) dosages of amphetamine (AMPH), animals exhibited disruption of LI but no alteration of PPI. Moreover, these animals always showed behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge. Objective In this study, we were interested in testing whether a different administration schedule would elicit disruption of both LI and PPI. Methods Animals were treated with continuous AMPH release (via osmotic mini-pumps at a dosage of 10 mg $ kg^{−1} $ $ day^{−1} $ for 7 days) and tested for their performance in L and PPI during withdrawal in a drug free state. Rats received AMPH treatment during the induction phase in their home cages or in the activity chambers. Following withdrawal, the expression of behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge was tested in both cases in the activity chambers. Results Animals pretreated with AMPH from both groups did not exhibit behavioural sensitization. Withdrawal from continuous administration induced LI attenuation with no effect on PPI. Conclusions These findings are similar to what was previously found with respect to an ESC AMPH regime. The only difference between the schedules was that the ESC AMPH schedule led to behavioural sensitization whereas the continuous AMPH did not. It is suggested that the expression of sensitization may not be a prerequisite for observed LI disruption. © Springer-Verlag 2006 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Rationale Schizophrenia has been associated with dysregulation of dopamine (DA) transmission and impairment in a number of experimental tasks, including sensorimotor gating assessed using prepulse inhibition (PPI) and selective attention assessed using latent inhibition (LI). We have demonstrated in previous studies that after withdrawal from escalating (ESC) dosages of amphetamine (AMPH), animals exhibited disruption of LI but no alteration of PPI. Moreover, these animals always showed behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge. Objective In this study, we were interested in testing whether a different administration schedule would elicit disruption of both LI and PPI. Methods Animals were treated with continuous AMPH release (via osmotic mini-pumps at a dosage of 10 mg $ kg^{−1} $ $ day^{−1} $ for 7 days) and tested for their performance in L and PPI during withdrawal in a drug free state. Rats received AMPH treatment during the induction phase in their home cages or in the activity chambers. Following withdrawal, the expression of behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge was tested in both cases in the activity chambers. Results Animals pretreated with AMPH from both groups did not exhibit behavioural sensitization. Withdrawal from continuous administration induced LI attenuation with no effect on PPI. Conclusions These findings are similar to what was previously found with respect to an ESC AMPH regime. The only difference between the schedules was that the ESC AMPH schedule led to behavioural sensitization whereas the continuous AMPH did not. It is suggested that the expression of sensitization may not be a prerequisite for observed LI disruption. © Springer-Verlag 2006 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Withdrawal from continuous amphetamine administration abolishes latent inhibition but leaves prepulse inhibition intact |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-0286-y |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Sydekum, Esther Russig, Holger Feldon, Joram |
| author2Str |
Sydekum, Esther Russig, Holger Feldon, Joram |
| ppnlink |
341342254 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s00213-005-0286-y |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T01:20:15.423Z |
| _version_ |
1803609456433430528 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR001998722</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519193659.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201001s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00213-005-0286-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR001998722</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00213-005-0286-y-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Peleg-Raibstein, Daria</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Withdrawal from continuous amphetamine administration abolishes latent inhibition but leaves prepulse inhibition intact</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer-Verlag 2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rationale Schizophrenia has been associated with dysregulation of dopamine (DA) transmission and impairment in a number of experimental tasks, including sensorimotor gating assessed using prepulse inhibition (PPI) and selective attention assessed using latent inhibition (LI). We have demonstrated in previous studies that after withdrawal from escalating (ESC) dosages of amphetamine (AMPH), animals exhibited disruption of LI but no alteration of PPI. Moreover, these animals always showed behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge. Objective In this study, we were interested in testing whether a different administration schedule would elicit disruption of both LI and PPI. Methods Animals were treated with continuous AMPH release (via osmotic mini-pumps at a dosage of 10 mg $ kg^{−1} $ $ day^{−1} $ for 7 days) and tested for their performance in L and PPI during withdrawal in a drug free state. Rats received AMPH treatment during the induction phase in their home cages or in the activity chambers. Following withdrawal, the expression of behavioural sensitization to an AMPH challenge was tested in both cases in the activity chambers. Results Animals pretreated with AMPH from both groups did not exhibit behavioural sensitization. Withdrawal from continuous administration induced LI attenuation with no effect on PPI. Conclusions These findings are similar to what was previously found with respect to an ESC AMPH regime. The only difference between the schedules was that the ESC AMPH schedule led to behavioural sensitization whereas the continuous AMPH did not. It is suggested that the expression of sensitization may not be a prerequisite for observed LI disruption.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Latent inhibition</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Prepulse inhibition</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Withdrawal</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Amphetamine</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sensitization</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rat</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Schizophrenia</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sydekum, Esther</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Russig, Holger</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Feldon, Joram</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Psychopharmacology</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 1959</subfield><subfield code="g">185(2006), 2 vom: 10. Feb., Seite 226-239</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)341342254</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2066933-1</subfield><subfield code="x">1432-2072</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:185</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2006</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:10</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:226-239</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-0286-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2070</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">185</subfield><subfield code="j">2006</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">10</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">226-239</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.401518 |