Screening of post-harvest decontamination methods for cereal grains and their impact on grain quality and technological performance
Abstract Cost-effective approaches for microbial decontamination of cereals are of great industrial interest to reduce post-harvest crop losses and consumer health hazards. The objective of this study was to screen a range of 13 treatments, including physical (high hydrostatic pressure, ultrasound,...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Schmidt, Marcus [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2018 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: European food research and technology - Berlin : Springer, 1999, 245(2018), 5 vom: 05. Dez., Seite 1061-1074 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:245 ; year:2018 ; number:5 ; day:05 ; month:12 ; pages:1061-1074 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s00217-018-3210-5 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
SPR002320525 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | SPR002320525 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230519213116.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 201001s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00217-018-3210-5 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)SPR002320525 | ||
035 | |a (SPR)s00217-018-3210-5-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Schmidt, Marcus |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Screening of post-harvest decontamination methods for cereal grains and their impact on grain quality and technological performance |
264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 | ||
520 | |a Abstract Cost-effective approaches for microbial decontamination of cereals are of great industrial interest to reduce post-harvest crop losses and consumer health hazards. The objective of this study was to screen a range of 13 treatments, including physical (high hydrostatic pressure, ultrasound, vacuum packaging and microwaves with and without sodium hypochlorite), chemical (hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, acetic acid, sorbate, propionate, quaternary ammonium compounds, and cold plasma), and microbiological (lactic acid bacteria) decontamination, on artificially infected wheat prior to storage in a model system for 6 weeks. Each treatment success, compared to positive and negative controls, was evaluated based on fungal bio-mass and accumulation of 13 mycotoxins during storage. To estimate the treatments impact on grain quality and technological performance, a comprehensive flour analysis was carried out, including activities of important wheat enzymes, soluble protein distribution, and gluten characterisation. The treated grains were also used to bake whole grain breads. The breads were analysed for quality parameters such as specific loaf volume, crumb structure, and physical crumb texture. Best decontamination procedures were found to be vacuum packaging, high hydrostatic pressure, microwave, sorbate, and propionate treatments, which fully inhibited fungal development and mycotoxin production. Deterioration in grain quality for the use in baking was found due to the microwave treatment as a result of the internal heating. The comparison of traditional methods with the novel approaches revealed that the conventional methods remain superior to the novel approaches due to their simplicity and efficiency without negative impact on the grains. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Grain storage |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Fusarium culmorum |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Antifungal |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Mycotoxins |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Physical decontamination |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Chemical decontamination |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
700 | 1 | |a Zannini, Emanuele |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Arendt, Elke K. |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European food research and technology |d Berlin : Springer, 1999 |g 245(2018), 5 vom: 05. Dez., Seite 1061-1074 |w (DE-627)27012859X |w (DE-600)1476605-X |x 1438-2385 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:245 |g year:2018 |g number:5 |g day:05 |g month:12 |g pages:1061-1074 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00217-018-3210-5 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_138 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_171 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_250 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_281 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_636 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2031 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2039 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2057 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2070 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2086 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2093 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2106 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2107 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2108 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2116 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2119 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2144 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2188 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2446 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2548 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4246 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 245 |j 2018 |e 5 |b 05 |c 12 |h 1061-1074 |
author_variant |
m s ms e z ez e k a ek eka |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:14382385:2018----::cennopshreteotmntomtosocraganadhiipcoganul |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2018 |
publishDate |
2018 |
allfields |
10.1007/s00217-018-3210-5 doi (DE-627)SPR002320525 (SPR)s00217-018-3210-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Schmidt, Marcus verfasserin aut Screening of post-harvest decontamination methods for cereal grains and their impact on grain quality and technological performance 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Cost-effective approaches for microbial decontamination of cereals are of great industrial interest to reduce post-harvest crop losses and consumer health hazards. The objective of this study was to screen a range of 13 treatments, including physical (high hydrostatic pressure, ultrasound, vacuum packaging and microwaves with and without sodium hypochlorite), chemical (hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, acetic acid, sorbate, propionate, quaternary ammonium compounds, and cold plasma), and microbiological (lactic acid bacteria) decontamination, on artificially infected wheat prior to storage in a model system for 6 weeks. Each treatment success, compared to positive and negative controls, was evaluated based on fungal bio-mass and accumulation of 13 mycotoxins during storage. To estimate the treatments impact on grain quality and technological performance, a comprehensive flour analysis was carried out, including activities of important wheat enzymes, soluble protein distribution, and gluten characterisation. The treated grains were also used to bake whole grain breads. The breads were analysed for quality parameters such as specific loaf volume, crumb structure, and physical crumb texture. Best decontamination procedures were found to be vacuum packaging, high hydrostatic pressure, microwave, sorbate, and propionate treatments, which fully inhibited fungal development and mycotoxin production. Deterioration in grain quality for the use in baking was found due to the microwave treatment as a result of the internal heating. The comparison of traditional methods with the novel approaches revealed that the conventional methods remain superior to the novel approaches due to their simplicity and efficiency without negative impact on the grains. Grain storage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Fusarium culmorum (dpeaa)DE-He213 Antifungal (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mycotoxins (dpeaa)DE-He213 Physical decontamination (dpeaa)DE-He213 Chemical decontamination (dpeaa)DE-He213 Zannini, Emanuele aut Arendt, Elke K. aut Enthalten in European food research and technology Berlin : Springer, 1999 245(2018), 5 vom: 05. Dez., Seite 1061-1074 (DE-627)27012859X (DE-600)1476605-X 1438-2385 nnns volume:245 year:2018 number:5 day:05 month:12 pages:1061-1074 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00217-018-3210-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 245 2018 5 05 12 1061-1074 |
spelling |
10.1007/s00217-018-3210-5 doi (DE-627)SPR002320525 (SPR)s00217-018-3210-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Schmidt, Marcus verfasserin aut Screening of post-harvest decontamination methods for cereal grains and their impact on grain quality and technological performance 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Cost-effective approaches for microbial decontamination of cereals are of great industrial interest to reduce post-harvest crop losses and consumer health hazards. The objective of this study was to screen a range of 13 treatments, including physical (high hydrostatic pressure, ultrasound, vacuum packaging and microwaves with and without sodium hypochlorite), chemical (hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, acetic acid, sorbate, propionate, quaternary ammonium compounds, and cold plasma), and microbiological (lactic acid bacteria) decontamination, on artificially infected wheat prior to storage in a model system for 6 weeks. Each treatment success, compared to positive and negative controls, was evaluated based on fungal bio-mass and accumulation of 13 mycotoxins during storage. To estimate the treatments impact on grain quality and technological performance, a comprehensive flour analysis was carried out, including activities of important wheat enzymes, soluble protein distribution, and gluten characterisation. The treated grains were also used to bake whole grain breads. The breads were analysed for quality parameters such as specific loaf volume, crumb structure, and physical crumb texture. Best decontamination procedures were found to be vacuum packaging, high hydrostatic pressure, microwave, sorbate, and propionate treatments, which fully inhibited fungal development and mycotoxin production. Deterioration in grain quality for the use in baking was found due to the microwave treatment as a result of the internal heating. The comparison of traditional methods with the novel approaches revealed that the conventional methods remain superior to the novel approaches due to their simplicity and efficiency without negative impact on the grains. Grain storage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Fusarium culmorum (dpeaa)DE-He213 Antifungal (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mycotoxins (dpeaa)DE-He213 Physical decontamination (dpeaa)DE-He213 Chemical decontamination (dpeaa)DE-He213 Zannini, Emanuele aut Arendt, Elke K. aut Enthalten in European food research and technology Berlin : Springer, 1999 245(2018), 5 vom: 05. Dez., Seite 1061-1074 (DE-627)27012859X (DE-600)1476605-X 1438-2385 nnns volume:245 year:2018 number:5 day:05 month:12 pages:1061-1074 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00217-018-3210-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 245 2018 5 05 12 1061-1074 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s00217-018-3210-5 doi (DE-627)SPR002320525 (SPR)s00217-018-3210-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Schmidt, Marcus verfasserin aut Screening of post-harvest decontamination methods for cereal grains and their impact on grain quality and technological performance 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Cost-effective approaches for microbial decontamination of cereals are of great industrial interest to reduce post-harvest crop losses and consumer health hazards. The objective of this study was to screen a range of 13 treatments, including physical (high hydrostatic pressure, ultrasound, vacuum packaging and microwaves with and without sodium hypochlorite), chemical (hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, acetic acid, sorbate, propionate, quaternary ammonium compounds, and cold plasma), and microbiological (lactic acid bacteria) decontamination, on artificially infected wheat prior to storage in a model system for 6 weeks. Each treatment success, compared to positive and negative controls, was evaluated based on fungal bio-mass and accumulation of 13 mycotoxins during storage. To estimate the treatments impact on grain quality and technological performance, a comprehensive flour analysis was carried out, including activities of important wheat enzymes, soluble protein distribution, and gluten characterisation. The treated grains were also used to bake whole grain breads. The breads were analysed for quality parameters such as specific loaf volume, crumb structure, and physical crumb texture. Best decontamination procedures were found to be vacuum packaging, high hydrostatic pressure, microwave, sorbate, and propionate treatments, which fully inhibited fungal development and mycotoxin production. Deterioration in grain quality for the use in baking was found due to the microwave treatment as a result of the internal heating. The comparison of traditional methods with the novel approaches revealed that the conventional methods remain superior to the novel approaches due to their simplicity and efficiency without negative impact on the grains. Grain storage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Fusarium culmorum (dpeaa)DE-He213 Antifungal (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mycotoxins (dpeaa)DE-He213 Physical decontamination (dpeaa)DE-He213 Chemical decontamination (dpeaa)DE-He213 Zannini, Emanuele aut Arendt, Elke K. aut Enthalten in European food research and technology Berlin : Springer, 1999 245(2018), 5 vom: 05. Dez., Seite 1061-1074 (DE-627)27012859X (DE-600)1476605-X 1438-2385 nnns volume:245 year:2018 number:5 day:05 month:12 pages:1061-1074 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00217-018-3210-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 245 2018 5 05 12 1061-1074 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s00217-018-3210-5 doi (DE-627)SPR002320525 (SPR)s00217-018-3210-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Schmidt, Marcus verfasserin aut Screening of post-harvest decontamination methods for cereal grains and their impact on grain quality and technological performance 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Cost-effective approaches for microbial decontamination of cereals are of great industrial interest to reduce post-harvest crop losses and consumer health hazards. The objective of this study was to screen a range of 13 treatments, including physical (high hydrostatic pressure, ultrasound, vacuum packaging and microwaves with and without sodium hypochlorite), chemical (hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, acetic acid, sorbate, propionate, quaternary ammonium compounds, and cold plasma), and microbiological (lactic acid bacteria) decontamination, on artificially infected wheat prior to storage in a model system for 6 weeks. Each treatment success, compared to positive and negative controls, was evaluated based on fungal bio-mass and accumulation of 13 mycotoxins during storage. To estimate the treatments impact on grain quality and technological performance, a comprehensive flour analysis was carried out, including activities of important wheat enzymes, soluble protein distribution, and gluten characterisation. The treated grains were also used to bake whole grain breads. The breads were analysed for quality parameters such as specific loaf volume, crumb structure, and physical crumb texture. Best decontamination procedures were found to be vacuum packaging, high hydrostatic pressure, microwave, sorbate, and propionate treatments, which fully inhibited fungal development and mycotoxin production. Deterioration in grain quality for the use in baking was found due to the microwave treatment as a result of the internal heating. The comparison of traditional methods with the novel approaches revealed that the conventional methods remain superior to the novel approaches due to their simplicity and efficiency without negative impact on the grains. Grain storage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Fusarium culmorum (dpeaa)DE-He213 Antifungal (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mycotoxins (dpeaa)DE-He213 Physical decontamination (dpeaa)DE-He213 Chemical decontamination (dpeaa)DE-He213 Zannini, Emanuele aut Arendt, Elke K. aut Enthalten in European food research and technology Berlin : Springer, 1999 245(2018), 5 vom: 05. Dez., Seite 1061-1074 (DE-627)27012859X (DE-600)1476605-X 1438-2385 nnns volume:245 year:2018 number:5 day:05 month:12 pages:1061-1074 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00217-018-3210-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 245 2018 5 05 12 1061-1074 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s00217-018-3210-5 doi (DE-627)SPR002320525 (SPR)s00217-018-3210-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Schmidt, Marcus verfasserin aut Screening of post-harvest decontamination methods for cereal grains and their impact on grain quality and technological performance 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Cost-effective approaches for microbial decontamination of cereals are of great industrial interest to reduce post-harvest crop losses and consumer health hazards. The objective of this study was to screen a range of 13 treatments, including physical (high hydrostatic pressure, ultrasound, vacuum packaging and microwaves with and without sodium hypochlorite), chemical (hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, acetic acid, sorbate, propionate, quaternary ammonium compounds, and cold plasma), and microbiological (lactic acid bacteria) decontamination, on artificially infected wheat prior to storage in a model system for 6 weeks. Each treatment success, compared to positive and negative controls, was evaluated based on fungal bio-mass and accumulation of 13 mycotoxins during storage. To estimate the treatments impact on grain quality and technological performance, a comprehensive flour analysis was carried out, including activities of important wheat enzymes, soluble protein distribution, and gluten characterisation. The treated grains were also used to bake whole grain breads. The breads were analysed for quality parameters such as specific loaf volume, crumb structure, and physical crumb texture. Best decontamination procedures were found to be vacuum packaging, high hydrostatic pressure, microwave, sorbate, and propionate treatments, which fully inhibited fungal development and mycotoxin production. Deterioration in grain quality for the use in baking was found due to the microwave treatment as a result of the internal heating. The comparison of traditional methods with the novel approaches revealed that the conventional methods remain superior to the novel approaches due to their simplicity and efficiency without negative impact on the grains. Grain storage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Fusarium culmorum (dpeaa)DE-He213 Antifungal (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mycotoxins (dpeaa)DE-He213 Physical decontamination (dpeaa)DE-He213 Chemical decontamination (dpeaa)DE-He213 Zannini, Emanuele aut Arendt, Elke K. aut Enthalten in European food research and technology Berlin : Springer, 1999 245(2018), 5 vom: 05. Dez., Seite 1061-1074 (DE-627)27012859X (DE-600)1476605-X 1438-2385 nnns volume:245 year:2018 number:5 day:05 month:12 pages:1061-1074 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00217-018-3210-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 245 2018 5 05 12 1061-1074 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in European food research and technology 245(2018), 5 vom: 05. Dez., Seite 1061-1074 volume:245 year:2018 number:5 day:05 month:12 pages:1061-1074 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in European food research and technology 245(2018), 5 vom: 05. Dez., Seite 1061-1074 volume:245 year:2018 number:5 day:05 month:12 pages:1061-1074 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Grain storage Fusarium culmorum Antifungal Mycotoxins Physical decontamination Chemical decontamination |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
European food research and technology |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Schmidt, Marcus @@aut@@ Zannini, Emanuele @@aut@@ Arendt, Elke K. @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-12-05T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
27012859X |
id |
SPR002320525 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR002320525</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519213116.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201001s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00217-018-3210-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR002320525</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00217-018-3210-5-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schmidt, Marcus</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Screening of post-harvest decontamination methods for cereal grains and their impact on grain quality and technological performance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Cost-effective approaches for microbial decontamination of cereals are of great industrial interest to reduce post-harvest crop losses and consumer health hazards. The objective of this study was to screen a range of 13 treatments, including physical (high hydrostatic pressure, ultrasound, vacuum packaging and microwaves with and without sodium hypochlorite), chemical (hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, acetic acid, sorbate, propionate, quaternary ammonium compounds, and cold plasma), and microbiological (lactic acid bacteria) decontamination, on artificially infected wheat prior to storage in a model system for 6 weeks. Each treatment success, compared to positive and negative controls, was evaluated based on fungal bio-mass and accumulation of 13 mycotoxins during storage. To estimate the treatments impact on grain quality and technological performance, a comprehensive flour analysis was carried out, including activities of important wheat enzymes, soluble protein distribution, and gluten characterisation. The treated grains were also used to bake whole grain breads. The breads were analysed for quality parameters such as specific loaf volume, crumb structure, and physical crumb texture. Best decontamination procedures were found to be vacuum packaging, high hydrostatic pressure, microwave, sorbate, and propionate treatments, which fully inhibited fungal development and mycotoxin production. Deterioration in grain quality for the use in baking was found due to the microwave treatment as a result of the internal heating. The comparison of traditional methods with the novel approaches revealed that the conventional methods remain superior to the novel approaches due to their simplicity and efficiency without negative impact on the grains.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Grain storage</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fusarium culmorum</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Antifungal</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mycotoxins</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Physical decontamination</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Chemical decontamination</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zannini, Emanuele</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arendt, Elke K.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">European food research and technology</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 1999</subfield><subfield code="g">245(2018), 5 vom: 05. Dez., Seite 1061-1074</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)27012859X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1476605-X</subfield><subfield code="x">1438-2385</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:245</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:05</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1061-1074</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00217-018-3210-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2070</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">245</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">05</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">1061-1074</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Schmidt, Marcus |
spellingShingle |
Schmidt, Marcus misc Grain storage misc Fusarium culmorum misc Antifungal misc Mycotoxins misc Physical decontamination misc Chemical decontamination Screening of post-harvest decontamination methods for cereal grains and their impact on grain quality and technological performance |
authorStr |
Schmidt, Marcus |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)27012859X |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
springer |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1438-2385 |
topic_title |
Screening of post-harvest decontamination methods for cereal grains and their impact on grain quality and technological performance Grain storage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Fusarium culmorum (dpeaa)DE-He213 Antifungal (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mycotoxins (dpeaa)DE-He213 Physical decontamination (dpeaa)DE-He213 Chemical decontamination (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
topic |
misc Grain storage misc Fusarium culmorum misc Antifungal misc Mycotoxins misc Physical decontamination misc Chemical decontamination |
topic_unstemmed |
misc Grain storage misc Fusarium culmorum misc Antifungal misc Mycotoxins misc Physical decontamination misc Chemical decontamination |
topic_browse |
misc Grain storage misc Fusarium culmorum misc Antifungal misc Mycotoxins misc Physical decontamination misc Chemical decontamination |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
European food research and technology |
hierarchy_parent_id |
27012859X |
hierarchy_top_title |
European food research and technology |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)27012859X (DE-600)1476605-X |
title |
Screening of post-harvest decontamination methods for cereal grains and their impact on grain quality and technological performance |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR002320525 (SPR)s00217-018-3210-5-e |
title_full |
Screening of post-harvest decontamination methods for cereal grains and their impact on grain quality and technological performance |
author_sort |
Schmidt, Marcus |
journal |
European food research and technology |
journalStr |
European food research and technology |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2018 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
1061 |
author_browse |
Schmidt, Marcus Zannini, Emanuele Arendt, Elke K. |
container_volume |
245 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Schmidt, Marcus |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s00217-018-3210-5 |
title_sort |
screening of post-harvest decontamination methods for cereal grains and their impact on grain quality and technological performance |
title_auth |
Screening of post-harvest decontamination methods for cereal grains and their impact on grain quality and technological performance |
abstract |
Abstract Cost-effective approaches for microbial decontamination of cereals are of great industrial interest to reduce post-harvest crop losses and consumer health hazards. The objective of this study was to screen a range of 13 treatments, including physical (high hydrostatic pressure, ultrasound, vacuum packaging and microwaves with and without sodium hypochlorite), chemical (hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, acetic acid, sorbate, propionate, quaternary ammonium compounds, and cold plasma), and microbiological (lactic acid bacteria) decontamination, on artificially infected wheat prior to storage in a model system for 6 weeks. Each treatment success, compared to positive and negative controls, was evaluated based on fungal bio-mass and accumulation of 13 mycotoxins during storage. To estimate the treatments impact on grain quality and technological performance, a comprehensive flour analysis was carried out, including activities of important wheat enzymes, soluble protein distribution, and gluten characterisation. The treated grains were also used to bake whole grain breads. The breads were analysed for quality parameters such as specific loaf volume, crumb structure, and physical crumb texture. Best decontamination procedures were found to be vacuum packaging, high hydrostatic pressure, microwave, sorbate, and propionate treatments, which fully inhibited fungal development and mycotoxin production. Deterioration in grain quality for the use in baking was found due to the microwave treatment as a result of the internal heating. The comparison of traditional methods with the novel approaches revealed that the conventional methods remain superior to the novel approaches due to their simplicity and efficiency without negative impact on the grains. © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 |
abstractGer |
Abstract Cost-effective approaches for microbial decontamination of cereals are of great industrial interest to reduce post-harvest crop losses and consumer health hazards. The objective of this study was to screen a range of 13 treatments, including physical (high hydrostatic pressure, ultrasound, vacuum packaging and microwaves with and without sodium hypochlorite), chemical (hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, acetic acid, sorbate, propionate, quaternary ammonium compounds, and cold plasma), and microbiological (lactic acid bacteria) decontamination, on artificially infected wheat prior to storage in a model system for 6 weeks. Each treatment success, compared to positive and negative controls, was evaluated based on fungal bio-mass and accumulation of 13 mycotoxins during storage. To estimate the treatments impact on grain quality and technological performance, a comprehensive flour analysis was carried out, including activities of important wheat enzymes, soluble protein distribution, and gluten characterisation. The treated grains were also used to bake whole grain breads. The breads were analysed for quality parameters such as specific loaf volume, crumb structure, and physical crumb texture. Best decontamination procedures were found to be vacuum packaging, high hydrostatic pressure, microwave, sorbate, and propionate treatments, which fully inhibited fungal development and mycotoxin production. Deterioration in grain quality for the use in baking was found due to the microwave treatment as a result of the internal heating. The comparison of traditional methods with the novel approaches revealed that the conventional methods remain superior to the novel approaches due to their simplicity and efficiency without negative impact on the grains. © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Cost-effective approaches for microbial decontamination of cereals are of great industrial interest to reduce post-harvest crop losses and consumer health hazards. The objective of this study was to screen a range of 13 treatments, including physical (high hydrostatic pressure, ultrasound, vacuum packaging and microwaves with and without sodium hypochlorite), chemical (hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, acetic acid, sorbate, propionate, quaternary ammonium compounds, and cold plasma), and microbiological (lactic acid bacteria) decontamination, on artificially infected wheat prior to storage in a model system for 6 weeks. Each treatment success, compared to positive and negative controls, was evaluated based on fungal bio-mass and accumulation of 13 mycotoxins during storage. To estimate the treatments impact on grain quality and technological performance, a comprehensive flour analysis was carried out, including activities of important wheat enzymes, soluble protein distribution, and gluten characterisation. The treated grains were also used to bake whole grain breads. The breads were analysed for quality parameters such as specific loaf volume, crumb structure, and physical crumb texture. Best decontamination procedures were found to be vacuum packaging, high hydrostatic pressure, microwave, sorbate, and propionate treatments, which fully inhibited fungal development and mycotoxin production. Deterioration in grain quality for the use in baking was found due to the microwave treatment as a result of the internal heating. The comparison of traditional methods with the novel approaches revealed that the conventional methods remain superior to the novel approaches due to their simplicity and efficiency without negative impact on the grains. © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
5 |
title_short |
Screening of post-harvest decontamination methods for cereal grains and their impact on grain quality and technological performance |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00217-018-3210-5 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Zannini, Emanuele Arendt, Elke K. |
author2Str |
Zannini, Emanuele Arendt, Elke K. |
ppnlink |
27012859X |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s00217-018-3210-5 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T02:37:28.928Z |
_version_ |
1803614315009277952 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR002320525</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519213116.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201001s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00217-018-3210-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR002320525</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00217-018-3210-5-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schmidt, Marcus</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Screening of post-harvest decontamination methods for cereal grains and their impact on grain quality and technological performance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Cost-effective approaches for microbial decontamination of cereals are of great industrial interest to reduce post-harvest crop losses and consumer health hazards. The objective of this study was to screen a range of 13 treatments, including physical (high hydrostatic pressure, ultrasound, vacuum packaging and microwaves with and without sodium hypochlorite), chemical (hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, acetic acid, sorbate, propionate, quaternary ammonium compounds, and cold plasma), and microbiological (lactic acid bacteria) decontamination, on artificially infected wheat prior to storage in a model system for 6 weeks. Each treatment success, compared to positive and negative controls, was evaluated based on fungal bio-mass and accumulation of 13 mycotoxins during storage. To estimate the treatments impact on grain quality and technological performance, a comprehensive flour analysis was carried out, including activities of important wheat enzymes, soluble protein distribution, and gluten characterisation. The treated grains were also used to bake whole grain breads. The breads were analysed for quality parameters such as specific loaf volume, crumb structure, and physical crumb texture. Best decontamination procedures were found to be vacuum packaging, high hydrostatic pressure, microwave, sorbate, and propionate treatments, which fully inhibited fungal development and mycotoxin production. Deterioration in grain quality for the use in baking was found due to the microwave treatment as a result of the internal heating. The comparison of traditional methods with the novel approaches revealed that the conventional methods remain superior to the novel approaches due to their simplicity and efficiency without negative impact on the grains.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Grain storage</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fusarium culmorum</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Antifungal</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mycotoxins</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Physical decontamination</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Chemical decontamination</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zannini, Emanuele</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arendt, Elke K.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">European food research and technology</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 1999</subfield><subfield code="g">245(2018), 5 vom: 05. Dez., Seite 1061-1074</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)27012859X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1476605-X</subfield><subfield code="x">1438-2385</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:245</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:05</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1061-1074</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00217-018-3210-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2070</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">245</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">05</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">1061-1074</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.400488 |