Use of thin-section, multidetector row helical CT images for coronal oblique reformations for optimal visualization of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament
Abstract Multidetector row computed tomography (CT) can acquire abdominal images of unprecedented thinness in a single breath-hold. This study investigated whether acquiring source axial images at 1.25 mm as opposed to 2.5 mm would result in a perceptible difference in image quality for coronal obli...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Faria, S. C. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2004 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2004 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Abdominal radiology - [Boston, MA] : Springer US, 2016, 29(2004), 2 vom: 14. Jan., Seite 231-238 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:29 ; year:2004 ; number:2 ; day:14 ; month:01 ; pages:231-238 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s00261-003-0106-y |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR003179486 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR003179486 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230519155146.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201001s2004 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00261-003-0106-y |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR003179486 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s00261-003-0106-y-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Faria, S. C. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Use of thin-section, multidetector row helical CT images for coronal oblique reformations for optimal visualization of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2004 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2004 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Multidetector row computed tomography (CT) can acquire abdominal images of unprecedented thinness in a single breath-hold. This study investigated whether acquiring source axial images at 1.25 mm as opposed to 2.5 mm would result in a perceptible difference in image quality for coronal oblique reformations. Similarly, the hypothesis that a slice pitch of 3:1 would be superior to 6:1 was evaluated. Twenty-nine CT studies were retrospectively evaluated. The images were divided into four groups: 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 6:1; and 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 6:1. Three radiologists evaluated by consensus the coronal oblique reformations for overall image quality and image quality of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament and of nodal groups. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images resulted in statistically significant better scores for overall image quality and visualization of the hepatic artery, portal vein, pancreatic duct, and nodal groups. However, a pitch of 3:1 rather than of 6:1 did not result in significant differences in ratings of image quality. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images improves image quality when creating coronal oblique reformations for abdominal anatomy. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Multidetector row computed tomographty—Multislice computed tomography—Computed tomography—Coronal oblique reformations—Imaging processing—Hepatoduodenal ligament |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tamm, E. P. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a DuBrow, R. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a David, C. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Loyer, E. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Herron, D. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sawaf, Y. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ball, G. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Silverman, P. M. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Charnsangavej, C. |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Abdominal radiology |d [Boston, MA] : Springer US, 2016 |g 29(2004), 2 vom: 14. Jan., Seite 231-238 |w (DE-627)847023133 |w (DE-600)2845742-0 |x 2366-0058 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:29 |g year:2004 |g number:2 |g day:14 |g month:01 |g pages:231-238 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-003-0106-y |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 29 |j 2004 |e 2 |b 14 |c 01 |h 231-238 | ||
| author_variant |
s c f sc scf e p t ep ept r d rd c d cd e l el d h dh y s ys g b gb p m s pm pms c c cc |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:23660058:2004----::sotiscinutdtcorweiaciaefrooaolqeeomtosootmliulztoos |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2004 |
| publishDate |
2004 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s00261-003-0106-y doi (DE-627)SPR003179486 (SPR)s00261-003-0106-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Faria, S. C. verfasserin aut Use of thin-section, multidetector row helical CT images for coronal oblique reformations for optimal visualization of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament 2004 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2004 Abstract Multidetector row computed tomography (CT) can acquire abdominal images of unprecedented thinness in a single breath-hold. This study investigated whether acquiring source axial images at 1.25 mm as opposed to 2.5 mm would result in a perceptible difference in image quality for coronal oblique reformations. Similarly, the hypothesis that a slice pitch of 3:1 would be superior to 6:1 was evaluated. Twenty-nine CT studies were retrospectively evaluated. The images were divided into four groups: 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 6:1; and 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 6:1. Three radiologists evaluated by consensus the coronal oblique reformations for overall image quality and image quality of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament and of nodal groups. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images resulted in statistically significant better scores for overall image quality and visualization of the hepatic artery, portal vein, pancreatic duct, and nodal groups. However, a pitch of 3:1 rather than of 6:1 did not result in significant differences in ratings of image quality. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images improves image quality when creating coronal oblique reformations for abdominal anatomy. Multidetector row computed tomographty—Multislice computed tomography—Computed tomography—Coronal oblique reformations—Imaging processing—Hepatoduodenal ligament (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tamm, E. P. aut DuBrow, R. aut David, C. aut Loyer, E. aut Herron, D. aut Sawaf, Y. aut Ball, G. aut Silverman, P. M. aut Charnsangavej, C. aut Enthalten in Abdominal radiology [Boston, MA] : Springer US, 2016 29(2004), 2 vom: 14. Jan., Seite 231-238 (DE-627)847023133 (DE-600)2845742-0 2366-0058 nnns volume:29 year:2004 number:2 day:14 month:01 pages:231-238 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-003-0106-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2113 AR 29 2004 2 14 01 231-238 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s00261-003-0106-y doi (DE-627)SPR003179486 (SPR)s00261-003-0106-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Faria, S. C. verfasserin aut Use of thin-section, multidetector row helical CT images for coronal oblique reformations for optimal visualization of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament 2004 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2004 Abstract Multidetector row computed tomography (CT) can acquire abdominal images of unprecedented thinness in a single breath-hold. This study investigated whether acquiring source axial images at 1.25 mm as opposed to 2.5 mm would result in a perceptible difference in image quality for coronal oblique reformations. Similarly, the hypothesis that a slice pitch of 3:1 would be superior to 6:1 was evaluated. Twenty-nine CT studies were retrospectively evaluated. The images were divided into four groups: 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 6:1; and 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 6:1. Three radiologists evaluated by consensus the coronal oblique reformations for overall image quality and image quality of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament and of nodal groups. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images resulted in statistically significant better scores for overall image quality and visualization of the hepatic artery, portal vein, pancreatic duct, and nodal groups. However, a pitch of 3:1 rather than of 6:1 did not result in significant differences in ratings of image quality. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images improves image quality when creating coronal oblique reformations for abdominal anatomy. Multidetector row computed tomographty—Multislice computed tomography—Computed tomography—Coronal oblique reformations—Imaging processing—Hepatoduodenal ligament (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tamm, E. P. aut DuBrow, R. aut David, C. aut Loyer, E. aut Herron, D. aut Sawaf, Y. aut Ball, G. aut Silverman, P. M. aut Charnsangavej, C. aut Enthalten in Abdominal radiology [Boston, MA] : Springer US, 2016 29(2004), 2 vom: 14. Jan., Seite 231-238 (DE-627)847023133 (DE-600)2845742-0 2366-0058 nnns volume:29 year:2004 number:2 day:14 month:01 pages:231-238 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-003-0106-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2113 AR 29 2004 2 14 01 231-238 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s00261-003-0106-y doi (DE-627)SPR003179486 (SPR)s00261-003-0106-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Faria, S. C. verfasserin aut Use of thin-section, multidetector row helical CT images for coronal oblique reformations for optimal visualization of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament 2004 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2004 Abstract Multidetector row computed tomography (CT) can acquire abdominal images of unprecedented thinness in a single breath-hold. This study investigated whether acquiring source axial images at 1.25 mm as opposed to 2.5 mm would result in a perceptible difference in image quality for coronal oblique reformations. Similarly, the hypothesis that a slice pitch of 3:1 would be superior to 6:1 was evaluated. Twenty-nine CT studies were retrospectively evaluated. The images were divided into four groups: 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 6:1; and 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 6:1. Three radiologists evaluated by consensus the coronal oblique reformations for overall image quality and image quality of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament and of nodal groups. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images resulted in statistically significant better scores for overall image quality and visualization of the hepatic artery, portal vein, pancreatic duct, and nodal groups. However, a pitch of 3:1 rather than of 6:1 did not result in significant differences in ratings of image quality. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images improves image quality when creating coronal oblique reformations for abdominal anatomy. Multidetector row computed tomographty—Multislice computed tomography—Computed tomography—Coronal oblique reformations—Imaging processing—Hepatoduodenal ligament (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tamm, E. P. aut DuBrow, R. aut David, C. aut Loyer, E. aut Herron, D. aut Sawaf, Y. aut Ball, G. aut Silverman, P. M. aut Charnsangavej, C. aut Enthalten in Abdominal radiology [Boston, MA] : Springer US, 2016 29(2004), 2 vom: 14. Jan., Seite 231-238 (DE-627)847023133 (DE-600)2845742-0 2366-0058 nnns volume:29 year:2004 number:2 day:14 month:01 pages:231-238 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-003-0106-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2113 AR 29 2004 2 14 01 231-238 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s00261-003-0106-y doi (DE-627)SPR003179486 (SPR)s00261-003-0106-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Faria, S. C. verfasserin aut Use of thin-section, multidetector row helical CT images for coronal oblique reformations for optimal visualization of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament 2004 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2004 Abstract Multidetector row computed tomography (CT) can acquire abdominal images of unprecedented thinness in a single breath-hold. This study investigated whether acquiring source axial images at 1.25 mm as opposed to 2.5 mm would result in a perceptible difference in image quality for coronal oblique reformations. Similarly, the hypothesis that a slice pitch of 3:1 would be superior to 6:1 was evaluated. Twenty-nine CT studies were retrospectively evaluated. The images were divided into four groups: 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 6:1; and 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 6:1. Three radiologists evaluated by consensus the coronal oblique reformations for overall image quality and image quality of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament and of nodal groups. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images resulted in statistically significant better scores for overall image quality and visualization of the hepatic artery, portal vein, pancreatic duct, and nodal groups. However, a pitch of 3:1 rather than of 6:1 did not result in significant differences in ratings of image quality. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images improves image quality when creating coronal oblique reformations for abdominal anatomy. Multidetector row computed tomographty—Multislice computed tomography—Computed tomography—Coronal oblique reformations—Imaging processing—Hepatoduodenal ligament (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tamm, E. P. aut DuBrow, R. aut David, C. aut Loyer, E. aut Herron, D. aut Sawaf, Y. aut Ball, G. aut Silverman, P. M. aut Charnsangavej, C. aut Enthalten in Abdominal radiology [Boston, MA] : Springer US, 2016 29(2004), 2 vom: 14. Jan., Seite 231-238 (DE-627)847023133 (DE-600)2845742-0 2366-0058 nnns volume:29 year:2004 number:2 day:14 month:01 pages:231-238 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-003-0106-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2113 AR 29 2004 2 14 01 231-238 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s00261-003-0106-y doi (DE-627)SPR003179486 (SPR)s00261-003-0106-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Faria, S. C. verfasserin aut Use of thin-section, multidetector row helical CT images for coronal oblique reformations for optimal visualization of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament 2004 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2004 Abstract Multidetector row computed tomography (CT) can acquire abdominal images of unprecedented thinness in a single breath-hold. This study investigated whether acquiring source axial images at 1.25 mm as opposed to 2.5 mm would result in a perceptible difference in image quality for coronal oblique reformations. Similarly, the hypothesis that a slice pitch of 3:1 would be superior to 6:1 was evaluated. Twenty-nine CT studies were retrospectively evaluated. The images were divided into four groups: 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 6:1; and 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 6:1. Three radiologists evaluated by consensus the coronal oblique reformations for overall image quality and image quality of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament and of nodal groups. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images resulted in statistically significant better scores for overall image quality and visualization of the hepatic artery, portal vein, pancreatic duct, and nodal groups. However, a pitch of 3:1 rather than of 6:1 did not result in significant differences in ratings of image quality. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images improves image quality when creating coronal oblique reformations for abdominal anatomy. Multidetector row computed tomographty—Multislice computed tomography—Computed tomography—Coronal oblique reformations—Imaging processing—Hepatoduodenal ligament (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tamm, E. P. aut DuBrow, R. aut David, C. aut Loyer, E. aut Herron, D. aut Sawaf, Y. aut Ball, G. aut Silverman, P. M. aut Charnsangavej, C. aut Enthalten in Abdominal radiology [Boston, MA] : Springer US, 2016 29(2004), 2 vom: 14. Jan., Seite 231-238 (DE-627)847023133 (DE-600)2845742-0 2366-0058 nnns volume:29 year:2004 number:2 day:14 month:01 pages:231-238 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-003-0106-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2113 AR 29 2004 2 14 01 231-238 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Abdominal radiology 29(2004), 2 vom: 14. Jan., Seite 231-238 volume:29 year:2004 number:2 day:14 month:01 pages:231-238 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Abdominal radiology 29(2004), 2 vom: 14. Jan., Seite 231-238 volume:29 year:2004 number:2 day:14 month:01 pages:231-238 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Multidetector row computed tomographty—Multislice computed tomography—Computed tomography—Coronal oblique reformations—Imaging processing—Hepatoduodenal ligament |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Abdominal radiology |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Faria, S. C. @@aut@@ Tamm, E. P. @@aut@@ DuBrow, R. @@aut@@ David, C. @@aut@@ Loyer, E. @@aut@@ Herron, D. @@aut@@ Sawaf, Y. @@aut@@ Ball, G. @@aut@@ Silverman, P. M. @@aut@@ Charnsangavej, C. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2004-01-14T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
847023133 |
| id |
SPR003179486 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR003179486</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519155146.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201001s2004 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00261-003-0106-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR003179486</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00261-003-0106-y-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Faria, S. C.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Use of thin-section, multidetector row helical CT images for coronal oblique reformations for optimal visualization of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Multidetector row computed tomography (CT) can acquire abdominal images of unprecedented thinness in a single breath-hold. This study investigated whether acquiring source axial images at 1.25 mm as opposed to 2.5 mm would result in a perceptible difference in image quality for coronal oblique reformations. Similarly, the hypothesis that a slice pitch of 3:1 would be superior to 6:1 was evaluated. Twenty-nine CT studies were retrospectively evaluated. The images were divided into four groups: 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 6:1; and 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 6:1. Three radiologists evaluated by consensus the coronal oblique reformations for overall image quality and image quality of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament and of nodal groups. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images resulted in statistically significant better scores for overall image quality and visualization of the hepatic artery, portal vein, pancreatic duct, and nodal groups. However, a pitch of 3:1 rather than of 6:1 did not result in significant differences in ratings of image quality. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images improves image quality when creating coronal oblique reformations for abdominal anatomy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Multidetector row computed tomographty—Multislice computed tomography—Computed tomography—Coronal oblique reformations—Imaging processing—Hepatoduodenal ligament</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tamm, E. P.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DuBrow, R.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">David, C.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Loyer, E.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Herron, D.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sawaf, Y.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ball, G.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Silverman, P. M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Charnsangavej, C.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Abdominal radiology</subfield><subfield code="d">[Boston, MA] : Springer US, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">29(2004), 2 vom: 14. Jan., Seite 231-238</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)847023133</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2845742-0</subfield><subfield code="x">2366-0058</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:29</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2004</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:14</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:231-238</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-003-0106-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">29</subfield><subfield code="j">2004</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">14</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">231-238</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Faria, S. C. |
| spellingShingle |
Faria, S. C. misc Multidetector row computed tomographty—Multislice computed tomography—Computed tomography—Coronal oblique reformations—Imaging processing—Hepatoduodenal ligament Use of thin-section, multidetector row helical CT images for coronal oblique reformations for optimal visualization of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament |
| authorStr |
Faria, S. C. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)847023133 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
2366-0058 |
| topic_title |
Use of thin-section, multidetector row helical CT images for coronal oblique reformations for optimal visualization of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament Multidetector row computed tomographty—Multislice computed tomography—Computed tomography—Coronal oblique reformations—Imaging processing—Hepatoduodenal ligament (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Multidetector row computed tomographty—Multislice computed tomography—Computed tomography—Coronal oblique reformations—Imaging processing—Hepatoduodenal ligament |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Multidetector row computed tomographty—Multislice computed tomography—Computed tomography—Coronal oblique reformations—Imaging processing—Hepatoduodenal ligament |
| topic_browse |
misc Multidetector row computed tomographty—Multislice computed tomography—Computed tomography—Coronal oblique reformations—Imaging processing—Hepatoduodenal ligament |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Abdominal radiology |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
847023133 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Abdominal radiology |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)847023133 (DE-600)2845742-0 |
| title |
Use of thin-section, multidetector row helical CT images for coronal oblique reformations for optimal visualization of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR003179486 (SPR)s00261-003-0106-y-e |
| title_full |
Use of thin-section, multidetector row helical CT images for coronal oblique reformations for optimal visualization of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament |
| author_sort |
Faria, S. C. |
| journal |
Abdominal radiology |
| journalStr |
Abdominal radiology |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2004 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
231 |
| author_browse |
Faria, S. C. Tamm, E. P. DuBrow, R. David, C. Loyer, E. Herron, D. Sawaf, Y. Ball, G. Silverman, P. M. Charnsangavej, C. |
| container_volume |
29 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Faria, S. C. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s00261-003-0106-y |
| title_sort |
use of thin-section, multidetector row helical ct images for coronal oblique reformations for optimal visualization of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament |
| title_auth |
Use of thin-section, multidetector row helical CT images for coronal oblique reformations for optimal visualization of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament |
| abstract |
Abstract Multidetector row computed tomography (CT) can acquire abdominal images of unprecedented thinness in a single breath-hold. This study investigated whether acquiring source axial images at 1.25 mm as opposed to 2.5 mm would result in a perceptible difference in image quality for coronal oblique reformations. Similarly, the hypothesis that a slice pitch of 3:1 would be superior to 6:1 was evaluated. Twenty-nine CT studies were retrospectively evaluated. The images were divided into four groups: 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 6:1; and 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 6:1. Three radiologists evaluated by consensus the coronal oblique reformations for overall image quality and image quality of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament and of nodal groups. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images resulted in statistically significant better scores for overall image quality and visualization of the hepatic artery, portal vein, pancreatic duct, and nodal groups. However, a pitch of 3:1 rather than of 6:1 did not result in significant differences in ratings of image quality. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images improves image quality when creating coronal oblique reformations for abdominal anatomy. © Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2004 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Multidetector row computed tomography (CT) can acquire abdominal images of unprecedented thinness in a single breath-hold. This study investigated whether acquiring source axial images at 1.25 mm as opposed to 2.5 mm would result in a perceptible difference in image quality for coronal oblique reformations. Similarly, the hypothesis that a slice pitch of 3:1 would be superior to 6:1 was evaluated. Twenty-nine CT studies were retrospectively evaluated. The images were divided into four groups: 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 6:1; and 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 6:1. Three radiologists evaluated by consensus the coronal oblique reformations for overall image quality and image quality of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament and of nodal groups. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images resulted in statistically significant better scores for overall image quality and visualization of the hepatic artery, portal vein, pancreatic duct, and nodal groups. However, a pitch of 3:1 rather than of 6:1 did not result in significant differences in ratings of image quality. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images improves image quality when creating coronal oblique reformations for abdominal anatomy. © Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2004 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Multidetector row computed tomography (CT) can acquire abdominal images of unprecedented thinness in a single breath-hold. This study investigated whether acquiring source axial images at 1.25 mm as opposed to 2.5 mm would result in a perceptible difference in image quality for coronal oblique reformations. Similarly, the hypothesis that a slice pitch of 3:1 would be superior to 6:1 was evaluated. Twenty-nine CT studies were retrospectively evaluated. The images were divided into four groups: 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 6:1; and 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 6:1. Three radiologists evaluated by consensus the coronal oblique reformations for overall image quality and image quality of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament and of nodal groups. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images resulted in statistically significant better scores for overall image quality and visualization of the hepatic artery, portal vein, pancreatic duct, and nodal groups. However, a pitch of 3:1 rather than of 6:1 did not result in significant differences in ratings of image quality. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images improves image quality when creating coronal oblique reformations for abdominal anatomy. © Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2004 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2113 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Use of thin-section, multidetector row helical CT images for coronal oblique reformations for optimal visualization of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-003-0106-y |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Tamm, E. P. DuBrow, R. David, C. Loyer, E. Herron, D. Sawaf, Y. Ball, G. Silverman, P. M. Charnsangavej, C. |
| author2Str |
Tamm, E. P. DuBrow, R. David, C. Loyer, E. Herron, D. Sawaf, Y. Ball, G. Silverman, P. M. Charnsangavej, C. |
| ppnlink |
847023133 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s00261-003-0106-y |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T17:50:06.407Z |
| _version_ |
1803581135424323584 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR003179486</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519155146.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201001s2004 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00261-003-0106-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR003179486</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00261-003-0106-y-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Faria, S. C.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Use of thin-section, multidetector row helical CT images for coronal oblique reformations for optimal visualization of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Multidetector row computed tomography (CT) can acquire abdominal images of unprecedented thinness in a single breath-hold. This study investigated whether acquiring source axial images at 1.25 mm as opposed to 2.5 mm would result in a perceptible difference in image quality for coronal oblique reformations. Similarly, the hypothesis that a slice pitch of 3:1 would be superior to 6:1 was evaluated. Twenty-nine CT studies were retrospectively evaluated. The images were divided into four groups: 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 3:1; 1.25-mm axial images, pitch 6:1; and 2.5-mm axial images, pitch 6:1. Three radiologists evaluated by consensus the coronal oblique reformations for overall image quality and image quality of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament and of nodal groups. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images resulted in statistically significant better scores for overall image quality and visualization of the hepatic artery, portal vein, pancreatic duct, and nodal groups. However, a pitch of 3:1 rather than of 6:1 did not result in significant differences in ratings of image quality. Use of 1.25-mm rather than of 2.5-mm source axial images improves image quality when creating coronal oblique reformations for abdominal anatomy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Multidetector row computed tomographty—Multislice computed tomography—Computed tomography—Coronal oblique reformations—Imaging processing—Hepatoduodenal ligament</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tamm, E. P.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DuBrow, R.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">David, C.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Loyer, E.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Herron, D.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sawaf, Y.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ball, G.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Silverman, P. M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Charnsangavej, C.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Abdominal radiology</subfield><subfield code="d">[Boston, MA] : Springer US, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">29(2004), 2 vom: 14. Jan., Seite 231-238</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)847023133</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2845742-0</subfield><subfield code="x">2366-0058</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:29</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2004</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:14</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:231-238</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-003-0106-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">29</subfield><subfield code="j">2004</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">14</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">231-238</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4008036 |