Role of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance portography in evaluating portal venous system compared with color Doppler ultrasonography
Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capability of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR portography in detecting abnormal findings associated with the portal venous system compared with the results of color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS). Materials and methods MR portography find...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Cakmak, Ozgur [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2007 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Abdominal radiology - [Boston, MA] : Springer US, 2016, 33(2007), 1 vom: 18. Apr., Seite 65-71 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:33 ; year:2007 ; number:1 ; day:18 ; month:04 ; pages:65-71 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s00261-007-9229-x |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR003184226 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR003184226 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230519155153.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201001s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00261-007-9229-x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR003184226 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s00261-007-9229-x-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Cakmak, Ozgur |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Role of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance portography in evaluating portal venous system compared with color Doppler ultrasonography |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2007 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007 | ||
| 520 | |a Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capability of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR portography in detecting abnormal findings associated with the portal venous system compared with the results of color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS). Materials and methods MR portography findings were retrospectively compared with the results of CDUS examinations in 161 patients, who were suspected of having portal venous system abnormalities. Portal venous vessels were divided into main 5 groups including the main portal vein, its left and right intrahepatic branches, splenic vein and superior mesenteric vein. Imaging findings were classified as normal, occluded, or partially thrombosed. Results of clinical and imaging follow-up examinations including CDUS, MR portography or angiography, if available, were used as a proof of final diagnosis. The potential sites of varicose veins and collateral vessels were also examined by both imaging methods. Results Vascular abnormalities were identified in 79 of 161 patients. There was a statistically significant agreement between the results of MR portography and CDUS in evaluating portal venous system (κ = 0.871, P < 0.05). The sensitivity of MR portography was slightly superior to CDUS in detecting partially thrombosis and occlusion in the main portal venous vessels. In addition, MR portograms were superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension by identifying portosystemic collaterals more adequately, and clearly demonstrated portal venous vessels that cannot be visualized at CDUS. Conclusion Results of present study indicates that contrast-enhanced 3D MR portography is well suited and superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Portal Vein |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Portal Vein Thrombosis |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Superior Mesenteric Vein |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Splenic Vein |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Varicose Vein |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Elmas, Nevra |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tamsel, Sadık |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Demirpolat, Gulgun |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sever, Ahmet |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Altunel, Ekrem |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Killi, Refik |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Abdominal radiology |d [Boston, MA] : Springer US, 2016 |g 33(2007), 1 vom: 18. Apr., Seite 65-71 |w (DE-627)847023133 |w (DE-600)2845742-0 |x 2366-0058 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2007 |g number:1 |g day:18 |g month:04 |g pages:65-71 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9229-x |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 33 |j 2007 |e 1 |b 18 |c 04 |h 65-71 | ||
| author_variant |
o c oc n e ne s t st g d gd a s as e a ea r k rk |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:23660058:2007----::oefotatnacddantceoacprorpynvlaigotleosytmoprd |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2007 |
| publishDate |
2007 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s00261-007-9229-x doi (DE-627)SPR003184226 (SPR)s00261-007-9229-x-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Cakmak, Ozgur verfasserin aut Role of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance portography in evaluating portal venous system compared with color Doppler ultrasonography 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007 Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capability of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR portography in detecting abnormal findings associated with the portal venous system compared with the results of color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS). Materials and methods MR portography findings were retrospectively compared with the results of CDUS examinations in 161 patients, who were suspected of having portal venous system abnormalities. Portal venous vessels were divided into main 5 groups including the main portal vein, its left and right intrahepatic branches, splenic vein and superior mesenteric vein. Imaging findings were classified as normal, occluded, or partially thrombosed. Results of clinical and imaging follow-up examinations including CDUS, MR portography or angiography, if available, were used as a proof of final diagnosis. The potential sites of varicose veins and collateral vessels were also examined by both imaging methods. Results Vascular abnormalities were identified in 79 of 161 patients. There was a statistically significant agreement between the results of MR portography and CDUS in evaluating portal venous system (κ = 0.871, P < 0.05). The sensitivity of MR portography was slightly superior to CDUS in detecting partially thrombosis and occlusion in the main portal venous vessels. In addition, MR portograms were superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension by identifying portosystemic collaterals more adequately, and clearly demonstrated portal venous vessels that cannot be visualized at CDUS. Conclusion Results of present study indicates that contrast-enhanced 3D MR portography is well suited and superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension. Portal Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Portal Vein Thrombosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Superior Mesenteric Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Splenic Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Varicose Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Elmas, Nevra aut Tamsel, Sadık aut Demirpolat, Gulgun aut Sever, Ahmet aut Altunel, Ekrem aut Killi, Refik aut Enthalten in Abdominal radiology [Boston, MA] : Springer US, 2016 33(2007), 1 vom: 18. Apr., Seite 65-71 (DE-627)847023133 (DE-600)2845742-0 2366-0058 nnns volume:33 year:2007 number:1 day:18 month:04 pages:65-71 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9229-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2113 AR 33 2007 1 18 04 65-71 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s00261-007-9229-x doi (DE-627)SPR003184226 (SPR)s00261-007-9229-x-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Cakmak, Ozgur verfasserin aut Role of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance portography in evaluating portal venous system compared with color Doppler ultrasonography 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007 Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capability of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR portography in detecting abnormal findings associated with the portal venous system compared with the results of color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS). Materials and methods MR portography findings were retrospectively compared with the results of CDUS examinations in 161 patients, who were suspected of having portal venous system abnormalities. Portal venous vessels were divided into main 5 groups including the main portal vein, its left and right intrahepatic branches, splenic vein and superior mesenteric vein. Imaging findings were classified as normal, occluded, or partially thrombosed. Results of clinical and imaging follow-up examinations including CDUS, MR portography or angiography, if available, were used as a proof of final diagnosis. The potential sites of varicose veins and collateral vessels were also examined by both imaging methods. Results Vascular abnormalities were identified in 79 of 161 patients. There was a statistically significant agreement between the results of MR portography and CDUS in evaluating portal venous system (κ = 0.871, P < 0.05). The sensitivity of MR portography was slightly superior to CDUS in detecting partially thrombosis and occlusion in the main portal venous vessels. In addition, MR portograms were superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension by identifying portosystemic collaterals more adequately, and clearly demonstrated portal venous vessels that cannot be visualized at CDUS. Conclusion Results of present study indicates that contrast-enhanced 3D MR portography is well suited and superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension. Portal Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Portal Vein Thrombosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Superior Mesenteric Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Splenic Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Varicose Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Elmas, Nevra aut Tamsel, Sadık aut Demirpolat, Gulgun aut Sever, Ahmet aut Altunel, Ekrem aut Killi, Refik aut Enthalten in Abdominal radiology [Boston, MA] : Springer US, 2016 33(2007), 1 vom: 18. Apr., Seite 65-71 (DE-627)847023133 (DE-600)2845742-0 2366-0058 nnns volume:33 year:2007 number:1 day:18 month:04 pages:65-71 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9229-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2113 AR 33 2007 1 18 04 65-71 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s00261-007-9229-x doi (DE-627)SPR003184226 (SPR)s00261-007-9229-x-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Cakmak, Ozgur verfasserin aut Role of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance portography in evaluating portal venous system compared with color Doppler ultrasonography 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007 Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capability of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR portography in detecting abnormal findings associated with the portal venous system compared with the results of color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS). Materials and methods MR portography findings were retrospectively compared with the results of CDUS examinations in 161 patients, who were suspected of having portal venous system abnormalities. Portal venous vessels were divided into main 5 groups including the main portal vein, its left and right intrahepatic branches, splenic vein and superior mesenteric vein. Imaging findings were classified as normal, occluded, or partially thrombosed. Results of clinical and imaging follow-up examinations including CDUS, MR portography or angiography, if available, were used as a proof of final diagnosis. The potential sites of varicose veins and collateral vessels were also examined by both imaging methods. Results Vascular abnormalities were identified in 79 of 161 patients. There was a statistically significant agreement between the results of MR portography and CDUS in evaluating portal venous system (κ = 0.871, P < 0.05). The sensitivity of MR portography was slightly superior to CDUS in detecting partially thrombosis and occlusion in the main portal venous vessels. In addition, MR portograms were superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension by identifying portosystemic collaterals more adequately, and clearly demonstrated portal venous vessels that cannot be visualized at CDUS. Conclusion Results of present study indicates that contrast-enhanced 3D MR portography is well suited and superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension. Portal Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Portal Vein Thrombosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Superior Mesenteric Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Splenic Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Varicose Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Elmas, Nevra aut Tamsel, Sadık aut Demirpolat, Gulgun aut Sever, Ahmet aut Altunel, Ekrem aut Killi, Refik aut Enthalten in Abdominal radiology [Boston, MA] : Springer US, 2016 33(2007), 1 vom: 18. Apr., Seite 65-71 (DE-627)847023133 (DE-600)2845742-0 2366-0058 nnns volume:33 year:2007 number:1 day:18 month:04 pages:65-71 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9229-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2113 AR 33 2007 1 18 04 65-71 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s00261-007-9229-x doi (DE-627)SPR003184226 (SPR)s00261-007-9229-x-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Cakmak, Ozgur verfasserin aut Role of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance portography in evaluating portal venous system compared with color Doppler ultrasonography 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007 Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capability of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR portography in detecting abnormal findings associated with the portal venous system compared with the results of color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS). Materials and methods MR portography findings were retrospectively compared with the results of CDUS examinations in 161 patients, who were suspected of having portal venous system abnormalities. Portal venous vessels were divided into main 5 groups including the main portal vein, its left and right intrahepatic branches, splenic vein and superior mesenteric vein. Imaging findings were classified as normal, occluded, or partially thrombosed. Results of clinical and imaging follow-up examinations including CDUS, MR portography or angiography, if available, were used as a proof of final diagnosis. The potential sites of varicose veins and collateral vessels were also examined by both imaging methods. Results Vascular abnormalities were identified in 79 of 161 patients. There was a statistically significant agreement between the results of MR portography and CDUS in evaluating portal venous system (κ = 0.871, P < 0.05). The sensitivity of MR portography was slightly superior to CDUS in detecting partially thrombosis and occlusion in the main portal venous vessels. In addition, MR portograms were superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension by identifying portosystemic collaterals more adequately, and clearly demonstrated portal venous vessels that cannot be visualized at CDUS. Conclusion Results of present study indicates that contrast-enhanced 3D MR portography is well suited and superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension. Portal Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Portal Vein Thrombosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Superior Mesenteric Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Splenic Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Varicose Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Elmas, Nevra aut Tamsel, Sadık aut Demirpolat, Gulgun aut Sever, Ahmet aut Altunel, Ekrem aut Killi, Refik aut Enthalten in Abdominal radiology [Boston, MA] : Springer US, 2016 33(2007), 1 vom: 18. Apr., Seite 65-71 (DE-627)847023133 (DE-600)2845742-0 2366-0058 nnns volume:33 year:2007 number:1 day:18 month:04 pages:65-71 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9229-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2113 AR 33 2007 1 18 04 65-71 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s00261-007-9229-x doi (DE-627)SPR003184226 (SPR)s00261-007-9229-x-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Cakmak, Ozgur verfasserin aut Role of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance portography in evaluating portal venous system compared with color Doppler ultrasonography 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007 Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capability of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR portography in detecting abnormal findings associated with the portal venous system compared with the results of color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS). Materials and methods MR portography findings were retrospectively compared with the results of CDUS examinations in 161 patients, who were suspected of having portal venous system abnormalities. Portal venous vessels were divided into main 5 groups including the main portal vein, its left and right intrahepatic branches, splenic vein and superior mesenteric vein. Imaging findings were classified as normal, occluded, or partially thrombosed. Results of clinical and imaging follow-up examinations including CDUS, MR portography or angiography, if available, were used as a proof of final diagnosis. The potential sites of varicose veins and collateral vessels were also examined by both imaging methods. Results Vascular abnormalities were identified in 79 of 161 patients. There was a statistically significant agreement between the results of MR portography and CDUS in evaluating portal venous system (κ = 0.871, P < 0.05). The sensitivity of MR portography was slightly superior to CDUS in detecting partially thrombosis and occlusion in the main portal venous vessels. In addition, MR portograms were superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension by identifying portosystemic collaterals more adequately, and clearly demonstrated portal venous vessels that cannot be visualized at CDUS. Conclusion Results of present study indicates that contrast-enhanced 3D MR portography is well suited and superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension. Portal Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Portal Vein Thrombosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Superior Mesenteric Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Splenic Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Varicose Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Elmas, Nevra aut Tamsel, Sadık aut Demirpolat, Gulgun aut Sever, Ahmet aut Altunel, Ekrem aut Killi, Refik aut Enthalten in Abdominal radiology [Boston, MA] : Springer US, 2016 33(2007), 1 vom: 18. Apr., Seite 65-71 (DE-627)847023133 (DE-600)2845742-0 2366-0058 nnns volume:33 year:2007 number:1 day:18 month:04 pages:65-71 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9229-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2113 AR 33 2007 1 18 04 65-71 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Abdominal radiology 33(2007), 1 vom: 18. Apr., Seite 65-71 volume:33 year:2007 number:1 day:18 month:04 pages:65-71 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Abdominal radiology 33(2007), 1 vom: 18. Apr., Seite 65-71 volume:33 year:2007 number:1 day:18 month:04 pages:65-71 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Portal Vein Portal Vein Thrombosis Superior Mesenteric Vein Splenic Vein Varicose Vein |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Abdominal radiology |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Cakmak, Ozgur @@aut@@ Elmas, Nevra @@aut@@ Tamsel, Sadık @@aut@@ Demirpolat, Gulgun @@aut@@ Sever, Ahmet @@aut@@ Altunel, Ekrem @@aut@@ Killi, Refik @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2007-04-18T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
847023133 |
| id |
SPR003184226 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR003184226</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519155153.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201001s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00261-007-9229-x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR003184226</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00261-007-9229-x-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cakmak, Ozgur</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Role of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance portography in evaluating portal venous system compared with color Doppler ultrasonography</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capability of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR portography in detecting abnormal findings associated with the portal venous system compared with the results of color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS). Materials and methods MR portography findings were retrospectively compared with the results of CDUS examinations in 161 patients, who were suspected of having portal venous system abnormalities. Portal venous vessels were divided into main 5 groups including the main portal vein, its left and right intrahepatic branches, splenic vein and superior mesenteric vein. Imaging findings were classified as normal, occluded, or partially thrombosed. Results of clinical and imaging follow-up examinations including CDUS, MR portography or angiography, if available, were used as a proof of final diagnosis. The potential sites of varicose veins and collateral vessels were also examined by both imaging methods. Results Vascular abnormalities were identified in 79 of 161 patients. There was a statistically significant agreement between the results of MR portography and CDUS in evaluating portal venous system (κ = 0.871, P < 0.05). The sensitivity of MR portography was slightly superior to CDUS in detecting partially thrombosis and occlusion in the main portal venous vessels. In addition, MR portograms were superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension by identifying portosystemic collaterals more adequately, and clearly demonstrated portal venous vessels that cannot be visualized at CDUS. Conclusion Results of present study indicates that contrast-enhanced 3D MR portography is well suited and superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Portal Vein</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Portal Vein Thrombosis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Superior Mesenteric Vein</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Splenic Vein</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Varicose Vein</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elmas, Nevra</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tamsel, Sadık</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Demirpolat, Gulgun</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sever, Ahmet</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Altunel, Ekrem</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Killi, Refik</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Abdominal radiology</subfield><subfield code="d">[Boston, MA] : Springer US, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">33(2007), 1 vom: 18. Apr., Seite 65-71</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)847023133</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2845742-0</subfield><subfield code="x">2366-0058</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:33</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2007</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:18</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:65-71</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9229-x</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">33</subfield><subfield code="j">2007</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">18</subfield><subfield code="c">04</subfield><subfield code="h">65-71</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Cakmak, Ozgur |
| spellingShingle |
Cakmak, Ozgur misc Portal Vein misc Portal Vein Thrombosis misc Superior Mesenteric Vein misc Splenic Vein misc Varicose Vein Role of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance portography in evaluating portal venous system compared with color Doppler ultrasonography |
| authorStr |
Cakmak, Ozgur |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)847023133 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
2366-0058 |
| topic_title |
Role of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance portography in evaluating portal venous system compared with color Doppler ultrasonography Portal Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Portal Vein Thrombosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Superior Mesenteric Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Splenic Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 Varicose Vein (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Portal Vein misc Portal Vein Thrombosis misc Superior Mesenteric Vein misc Splenic Vein misc Varicose Vein |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Portal Vein misc Portal Vein Thrombosis misc Superior Mesenteric Vein misc Splenic Vein misc Varicose Vein |
| topic_browse |
misc Portal Vein misc Portal Vein Thrombosis misc Superior Mesenteric Vein misc Splenic Vein misc Varicose Vein |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Abdominal radiology |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
847023133 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Abdominal radiology |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)847023133 (DE-600)2845742-0 |
| title |
Role of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance portography in evaluating portal venous system compared with color Doppler ultrasonography |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR003184226 (SPR)s00261-007-9229-x-e |
| title_full |
Role of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance portography in evaluating portal venous system compared with color Doppler ultrasonography |
| author_sort |
Cakmak, Ozgur |
| journal |
Abdominal radiology |
| journalStr |
Abdominal radiology |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2007 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
65 |
| author_browse |
Cakmak, Ozgur Elmas, Nevra Tamsel, Sadık Demirpolat, Gulgun Sever, Ahmet Altunel, Ekrem Killi, Refik |
| container_volume |
33 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Cakmak, Ozgur |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s00261-007-9229-x |
| title_sort |
role of contrast-enhanced 3d magnetic resonance portography in evaluating portal venous system compared with color doppler ultrasonography |
| title_auth |
Role of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance portography in evaluating portal venous system compared with color Doppler ultrasonography |
| abstract |
Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capability of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR portography in detecting abnormal findings associated with the portal venous system compared with the results of color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS). Materials and methods MR portography findings were retrospectively compared with the results of CDUS examinations in 161 patients, who were suspected of having portal venous system abnormalities. Portal venous vessels were divided into main 5 groups including the main portal vein, its left and right intrahepatic branches, splenic vein and superior mesenteric vein. Imaging findings were classified as normal, occluded, or partially thrombosed. Results of clinical and imaging follow-up examinations including CDUS, MR portography or angiography, if available, were used as a proof of final diagnosis. The potential sites of varicose veins and collateral vessels were also examined by both imaging methods. Results Vascular abnormalities were identified in 79 of 161 patients. There was a statistically significant agreement between the results of MR portography and CDUS in evaluating portal venous system (κ = 0.871, P < 0.05). The sensitivity of MR portography was slightly superior to CDUS in detecting partially thrombosis and occlusion in the main portal venous vessels. In addition, MR portograms were superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension by identifying portosystemic collaterals more adequately, and clearly demonstrated portal venous vessels that cannot be visualized at CDUS. Conclusion Results of present study indicates that contrast-enhanced 3D MR portography is well suited and superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007 |
| abstractGer |
Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capability of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR portography in detecting abnormal findings associated with the portal venous system compared with the results of color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS). Materials and methods MR portography findings were retrospectively compared with the results of CDUS examinations in 161 patients, who were suspected of having portal venous system abnormalities. Portal venous vessels were divided into main 5 groups including the main portal vein, its left and right intrahepatic branches, splenic vein and superior mesenteric vein. Imaging findings were classified as normal, occluded, or partially thrombosed. Results of clinical and imaging follow-up examinations including CDUS, MR portography or angiography, if available, were used as a proof of final diagnosis. The potential sites of varicose veins and collateral vessels were also examined by both imaging methods. Results Vascular abnormalities were identified in 79 of 161 patients. There was a statistically significant agreement between the results of MR portography and CDUS in evaluating portal venous system (κ = 0.871, P < 0.05). The sensitivity of MR portography was slightly superior to CDUS in detecting partially thrombosis and occlusion in the main portal venous vessels. In addition, MR portograms were superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension by identifying portosystemic collaterals more adequately, and clearly demonstrated portal venous vessels that cannot be visualized at CDUS. Conclusion Results of present study indicates that contrast-enhanced 3D MR portography is well suited and superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capability of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR portography in detecting abnormal findings associated with the portal venous system compared with the results of color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS). Materials and methods MR portography findings were retrospectively compared with the results of CDUS examinations in 161 patients, who were suspected of having portal venous system abnormalities. Portal venous vessels were divided into main 5 groups including the main portal vein, its left and right intrahepatic branches, splenic vein and superior mesenteric vein. Imaging findings were classified as normal, occluded, or partially thrombosed. Results of clinical and imaging follow-up examinations including CDUS, MR portography or angiography, if available, were used as a proof of final diagnosis. The potential sites of varicose veins and collateral vessels were also examined by both imaging methods. Results Vascular abnormalities were identified in 79 of 161 patients. There was a statistically significant agreement between the results of MR portography and CDUS in evaluating portal venous system (κ = 0.871, P < 0.05). The sensitivity of MR portography was slightly superior to CDUS in detecting partially thrombosis and occlusion in the main portal venous vessels. In addition, MR portograms were superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension by identifying portosystemic collaterals more adequately, and clearly demonstrated portal venous vessels that cannot be visualized at CDUS. Conclusion Results of present study indicates that contrast-enhanced 3D MR portography is well suited and superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2113 |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Role of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance portography in evaluating portal venous system compared with color Doppler ultrasonography |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9229-x |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Elmas, Nevra Tamsel, Sadık Demirpolat, Gulgun Sever, Ahmet Altunel, Ekrem Killi, Refik |
| author2Str |
Elmas, Nevra Tamsel, Sadık Demirpolat, Gulgun Sever, Ahmet Altunel, Ekrem Killi, Refik |
| ppnlink |
847023133 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s00261-007-9229-x |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T17:51:19.921Z |
| _version_ |
1803581212509339648 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR003184226</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519155153.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201001s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00261-007-9229-x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR003184226</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00261-007-9229-x-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cakmak, Ozgur</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Role of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance portography in evaluating portal venous system compared with color Doppler ultrasonography</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capability of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR portography in detecting abnormal findings associated with the portal venous system compared with the results of color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS). Materials and methods MR portography findings were retrospectively compared with the results of CDUS examinations in 161 patients, who were suspected of having portal venous system abnormalities. Portal venous vessels were divided into main 5 groups including the main portal vein, its left and right intrahepatic branches, splenic vein and superior mesenteric vein. Imaging findings were classified as normal, occluded, or partially thrombosed. Results of clinical and imaging follow-up examinations including CDUS, MR portography or angiography, if available, were used as a proof of final diagnosis. The potential sites of varicose veins and collateral vessels were also examined by both imaging methods. Results Vascular abnormalities were identified in 79 of 161 patients. There was a statistically significant agreement between the results of MR portography and CDUS in evaluating portal venous system (κ = 0.871, P < 0.05). The sensitivity of MR portography was slightly superior to CDUS in detecting partially thrombosis and occlusion in the main portal venous vessels. In addition, MR portograms were superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension by identifying portosystemic collaterals more adequately, and clearly demonstrated portal venous vessels that cannot be visualized at CDUS. Conclusion Results of present study indicates that contrast-enhanced 3D MR portography is well suited and superior to CDUS in the management of patients with portal hypertension.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Portal Vein</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Portal Vein Thrombosis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Superior Mesenteric Vein</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Splenic Vein</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Varicose Vein</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elmas, Nevra</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tamsel, Sadık</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Demirpolat, Gulgun</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sever, Ahmet</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Altunel, Ekrem</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Killi, Refik</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Abdominal radiology</subfield><subfield code="d">[Boston, MA] : Springer US, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">33(2007), 1 vom: 18. Apr., Seite 65-71</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)847023133</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2845742-0</subfield><subfield code="x">2366-0058</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:33</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2007</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:18</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:65-71</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9229-x</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">33</subfield><subfield code="j">2007</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">18</subfield><subfield code="c">04</subfield><subfield code="h">65-71</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4032135 |