The Pedicle Tram Flap: A Focus on Improved Aesthetic Outcome

Background The transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap technique is the most versatile and artistic procedure currently used for breast reconstruction. Several variations have been described in the past with regard to the aesthetic objectives of reconstruction and the technical steps to achieve these goals. This study aimed to analyze changes introduced by the authors to improve the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction using the pedicle TRAM flap in terms of three specific aesthetic goals: (1) better definition of the submammary fold, (2) improved reconstruction of the tail of the breast and anterior axillary wall after axillary clearance, and (3) improved projection of the lower pole of the reconstructed breast. Methods The design of the pedicle flap has been modified to accommodate four surgical scenarios: vertical orientations of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle and horizontal orientation of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle. In each of these variations, specific surgical steps were undertaken to produce extension of the flap into the axilla, better definition of the submammary fold, and folding of the flap in its lower part to increase lower pole projection. Postoperatively, standardized five-view images of the patients were taken and presented to blinded observers, who were requested to award a numeric score to the aesthetic outcome. The numeric scores then were analyzed statistically. An experimental group of 11 patients who underwent reconstruction using the modified/improved technique were compared with a control group of 17 patients who underwent reconstruction using the classic technique. The incidences of complications for the two groups were compared and analyzed as well. Results The two groups of patients were comparable in terms of their age distribution and incidences of donor site and recipient site complications. A statistically significant difference was noted between the aesthetic scores awarded to patients who underwent surgery using the improved technique and those awarded to those who underwent surgery using the classic technique (p = 0.0006). Conclusion A model is presented for statistical analysis of the aesthetic outcome for breast reconstruction using an improved TRAM flap design as compared with using a classic TRAM flap design. This model offers an evidence-based decision-making process and uses the principle of aesthetic breast surgery adapted to breast reconstruction. On the basis of this model, the authors conclude that the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction can be improved by attention to details such as better projection of the breast’s lower pole, improved sculpting of the submammary fold, and attention to filling contour deficits of the axilla after axillary clearance. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Fayman, Moshe S. [verfasserIn] Potgieter, Estelle Becker, Piet J.

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2006

Schlagwörter:	Axillary dissection Axillary tail Breast projection Breast reconstruction Submammary fold TRAM flap

Anmerkung:	© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Aesthetic plastic surgery - New York, NY : Springer, 1976, 30(2006), 3 vom: 01. Juni, Seite 301-308
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:30 ; year:2006 ; number:3 ; day:01 ; month:06 ; pages:301-308

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1007/s00266-005-0147-4

Katalog-ID:	SPR003332551

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	SPR003332551
003	DE-627
005	20230519155436.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	201001s2006 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1007/s00266-005-0147-4 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR003332551
035			\|a (SPR)s00266-005-0147-4-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Fayman, Moshe S. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	4	\|a The Pedicle Tram Flap: A Focus on Improved Aesthetic Outcome
264		1	\|c 2006
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006
520			\|a Background The transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap technique is the most versatile and artistic procedure currently used for breast reconstruction. Several variations have been described in the past with regard to the aesthetic objectives of reconstruction and the technical steps to achieve these goals. This study aimed to analyze changes introduced by the authors to improve the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction using the pedicle TRAM flap in terms of three specific aesthetic goals: (1) better definition of the submammary fold, (2) improved reconstruction of the tail of the breast and anterior axillary wall after axillary clearance, and (3) improved projection of the lower pole of the reconstructed breast. Methods The design of the pedicle flap has been modified to accommodate four surgical scenarios: vertical orientations of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle and horizontal orientation of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle. In each of these variations, specific surgical steps were undertaken to produce extension of the flap into the axilla, better definition of the submammary fold, and folding of the flap in its lower part to increase lower pole projection. Postoperatively, standardized five-view images of the patients were taken and presented to blinded observers, who were requested to award a numeric score to the aesthetic outcome. The numeric scores then were analyzed statistically. An experimental group of 11 patients who underwent reconstruction using the modified/improved technique were compared with a control group of 17 patients who underwent reconstruction using the classic technique. The incidences of complications for the two groups were compared and analyzed as well. Results The two groups of patients were comparable in terms of their age distribution and incidences of donor site and recipient site complications. A statistically significant difference was noted between the aesthetic scores awarded to patients who underwent surgery using the improved technique and those awarded to those who underwent surgery using the classic technique (p = 0.0006). Conclusion A model is presented for statistical analysis of the aesthetic outcome for breast reconstruction using an improved TRAM flap design as compared with using a classic TRAM flap design. This model offers an evidence-based decision-making process and uses the principle of aesthetic breast surgery adapted to breast reconstruction. On the basis of this model, the authors conclude that the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction can be improved by attention to details such as better projection of the breast’s lower pole, improved sculpting of the submammary fold, and attention to filling contour deficits of the axilla after axillary clearance.
650		4	\|a Axillary dissection \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Axillary tail \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Breast projection \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Breast reconstruction \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Submammary fold \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a TRAM flap \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Potgieter, Estelle \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Becker, Piet J. \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Aesthetic plastic surgery \|d New York, NY : Springer, 1976 \|g 30(2006), 3 vom: 01. Juni, Seite 301-308 \|w (DE-627)254630758 \|w (DE-600)1462126-5 \|x 1432-5241 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:30 \|g year:2006 \|g number:3 \|g day:01 \|g month:06 \|g pages:301-308
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-005-0147-4 \|z lizenzpflichtig \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_101
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_120
912			\|a GBV_ILN_138
912			\|a GBV_ILN_150
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_171
912			\|a GBV_ILN_187
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_250
912			\|a GBV_ILN_267
912			\|a GBV_ILN_281
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_636
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_711
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2031
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2039
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2057
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2065
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2070
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2086
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2088
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2093
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2107
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2108
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2113
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2116
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2118
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2119
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2144
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2188
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2446
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2470
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2472
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2522
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2548
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4046
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4246
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 30 \|j 2006 \|e 3 \|b 01 \|c 06 \|h 301-308

Indexfelder

author_variant	m s f ms msf e p ep p j b pj pjb
matchkey_str	article:14325241:2006----::hpdcermlpfcsnmrvde
hierarchy_sort_str	2006
publishDate	2006
allfields	10.1007/s00266-005-0147-4 doi (DE-627)SPR003332551 (SPR)s00266-005-0147-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Fayman, Moshe S. verfasserin aut The Pedicle Tram Flap: A Focus on Improved Aesthetic Outcome 2006 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006 Background The transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap technique is the most versatile and artistic procedure currently used for breast reconstruction. Several variations have been described in the past with regard to the aesthetic objectives of reconstruction and the technical steps to achieve these goals. This study aimed to analyze changes introduced by the authors to improve the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction using the pedicle TRAM flap in terms of three specific aesthetic goals: (1) better definition of the submammary fold, (2) improved reconstruction of the tail of the breast and anterior axillary wall after axillary clearance, and (3) improved projection of the lower pole of the reconstructed breast. Methods The design of the pedicle flap has been modified to accommodate four surgical scenarios: vertical orientations of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle and horizontal orientation of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle. In each of these variations, specific surgical steps were undertaken to produce extension of the flap into the axilla, better definition of the submammary fold, and folding of the flap in its lower part to increase lower pole projection. Postoperatively, standardized five-view images of the patients were taken and presented to blinded observers, who were requested to award a numeric score to the aesthetic outcome. The numeric scores then were analyzed statistically. An experimental group of 11 patients who underwent reconstruction using the modified/improved technique were compared with a control group of 17 patients who underwent reconstruction using the classic technique. The incidences of complications for the two groups were compared and analyzed as well. Results The two groups of patients were comparable in terms of their age distribution and incidences of donor site and recipient site complications. A statistically significant difference was noted between the aesthetic scores awarded to patients who underwent surgery using the improved technique and those awarded to those who underwent surgery using the classic technique (p = 0.0006). Conclusion A model is presented for statistical analysis of the aesthetic outcome for breast reconstruction using an improved TRAM flap design as compared with using a classic TRAM flap design. This model offers an evidence-based decision-making process and uses the principle of aesthetic breast surgery adapted to breast reconstruction. On the basis of this model, the authors conclude that the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction can be improved by attention to details such as better projection of the breast’s lower pole, improved sculpting of the submammary fold, and attention to filling contour deficits of the axilla after axillary clearance. Axillary dissection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Axillary tail (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast projection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast reconstruction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Submammary fold (dpeaa)DE-He213 TRAM flap (dpeaa)DE-He213 Potgieter, Estelle aut Becker, Piet J. aut Enthalten in Aesthetic plastic surgery New York, NY : Springer, 1976 30(2006), 3 vom: 01. Juni, Seite 301-308 (DE-627)254630758 (DE-600)1462126-5 1432-5241 nnns volume:30 year:2006 number:3 day:01 month:06 pages:301-308 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-005-0147-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 30 2006 3 01 06 301-308
spelling	10.1007/s00266-005-0147-4 doi (DE-627)SPR003332551 (SPR)s00266-005-0147-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Fayman, Moshe S. verfasserin aut The Pedicle Tram Flap: A Focus on Improved Aesthetic Outcome 2006 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006 Background The transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap technique is the most versatile and artistic procedure currently used for breast reconstruction. Several variations have been described in the past with regard to the aesthetic objectives of reconstruction and the technical steps to achieve these goals. This study aimed to analyze changes introduced by the authors to improve the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction using the pedicle TRAM flap in terms of three specific aesthetic goals: (1) better definition of the submammary fold, (2) improved reconstruction of the tail of the breast and anterior axillary wall after axillary clearance, and (3) improved projection of the lower pole of the reconstructed breast. Methods The design of the pedicle flap has been modified to accommodate four surgical scenarios: vertical orientations of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle and horizontal orientation of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle. In each of these variations, specific surgical steps were undertaken to produce extension of the flap into the axilla, better definition of the submammary fold, and folding of the flap in its lower part to increase lower pole projection. Postoperatively, standardized five-view images of the patients were taken and presented to blinded observers, who were requested to award a numeric score to the aesthetic outcome. The numeric scores then were analyzed statistically. An experimental group of 11 patients who underwent reconstruction using the modified/improved technique were compared with a control group of 17 patients who underwent reconstruction using the classic technique. The incidences of complications for the two groups were compared and analyzed as well. Results The two groups of patients were comparable in terms of their age distribution and incidences of donor site and recipient site complications. A statistically significant difference was noted between the aesthetic scores awarded to patients who underwent surgery using the improved technique and those awarded to those who underwent surgery using the classic technique (p = 0.0006). Conclusion A model is presented for statistical analysis of the aesthetic outcome for breast reconstruction using an improved TRAM flap design as compared with using a classic TRAM flap design. This model offers an evidence-based decision-making process and uses the principle of aesthetic breast surgery adapted to breast reconstruction. On the basis of this model, the authors conclude that the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction can be improved by attention to details such as better projection of the breast’s lower pole, improved sculpting of the submammary fold, and attention to filling contour deficits of the axilla after axillary clearance. Axillary dissection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Axillary tail (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast projection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast reconstruction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Submammary fold (dpeaa)DE-He213 TRAM flap (dpeaa)DE-He213 Potgieter, Estelle aut Becker, Piet J. aut Enthalten in Aesthetic plastic surgery New York, NY : Springer, 1976 30(2006), 3 vom: 01. Juni, Seite 301-308 (DE-627)254630758 (DE-600)1462126-5 1432-5241 nnns volume:30 year:2006 number:3 day:01 month:06 pages:301-308 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-005-0147-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 30 2006 3 01 06 301-308
allfields_unstemmed	10.1007/s00266-005-0147-4 doi (DE-627)SPR003332551 (SPR)s00266-005-0147-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Fayman, Moshe S. verfasserin aut The Pedicle Tram Flap: A Focus on Improved Aesthetic Outcome 2006 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006 Background The transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap technique is the most versatile and artistic procedure currently used for breast reconstruction. Several variations have been described in the past with regard to the aesthetic objectives of reconstruction and the technical steps to achieve these goals. This study aimed to analyze changes introduced by the authors to improve the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction using the pedicle TRAM flap in terms of three specific aesthetic goals: (1) better definition of the submammary fold, (2) improved reconstruction of the tail of the breast and anterior axillary wall after axillary clearance, and (3) improved projection of the lower pole of the reconstructed breast. Methods The design of the pedicle flap has been modified to accommodate four surgical scenarios: vertical orientations of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle and horizontal orientation of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle. In each of these variations, specific surgical steps were undertaken to produce extension of the flap into the axilla, better definition of the submammary fold, and folding of the flap in its lower part to increase lower pole projection. Postoperatively, standardized five-view images of the patients were taken and presented to blinded observers, who were requested to award a numeric score to the aesthetic outcome. The numeric scores then were analyzed statistically. An experimental group of 11 patients who underwent reconstruction using the modified/improved technique were compared with a control group of 17 patients who underwent reconstruction using the classic technique. The incidences of complications for the two groups were compared and analyzed as well. Results The two groups of patients were comparable in terms of their age distribution and incidences of donor site and recipient site complications. A statistically significant difference was noted between the aesthetic scores awarded to patients who underwent surgery using the improved technique and those awarded to those who underwent surgery using the classic technique (p = 0.0006). Conclusion A model is presented for statistical analysis of the aesthetic outcome for breast reconstruction using an improved TRAM flap design as compared with using a classic TRAM flap design. This model offers an evidence-based decision-making process and uses the principle of aesthetic breast surgery adapted to breast reconstruction. On the basis of this model, the authors conclude that the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction can be improved by attention to details such as better projection of the breast’s lower pole, improved sculpting of the submammary fold, and attention to filling contour deficits of the axilla after axillary clearance. Axillary dissection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Axillary tail (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast projection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast reconstruction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Submammary fold (dpeaa)DE-He213 TRAM flap (dpeaa)DE-He213 Potgieter, Estelle aut Becker, Piet J. aut Enthalten in Aesthetic plastic surgery New York, NY : Springer, 1976 30(2006), 3 vom: 01. Juni, Seite 301-308 (DE-627)254630758 (DE-600)1462126-5 1432-5241 nnns volume:30 year:2006 number:3 day:01 month:06 pages:301-308 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-005-0147-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 30 2006 3 01 06 301-308
allfieldsGer	10.1007/s00266-005-0147-4 doi (DE-627)SPR003332551 (SPR)s00266-005-0147-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Fayman, Moshe S. verfasserin aut The Pedicle Tram Flap: A Focus on Improved Aesthetic Outcome 2006 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006 Background The transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap technique is the most versatile and artistic procedure currently used for breast reconstruction. Several variations have been described in the past with regard to the aesthetic objectives of reconstruction and the technical steps to achieve these goals. This study aimed to analyze changes introduced by the authors to improve the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction using the pedicle TRAM flap in terms of three specific aesthetic goals: (1) better definition of the submammary fold, (2) improved reconstruction of the tail of the breast and anterior axillary wall after axillary clearance, and (3) improved projection of the lower pole of the reconstructed breast. Methods The design of the pedicle flap has been modified to accommodate four surgical scenarios: vertical orientations of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle and horizontal orientation of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle. In each of these variations, specific surgical steps were undertaken to produce extension of the flap into the axilla, better definition of the submammary fold, and folding of the flap in its lower part to increase lower pole projection. Postoperatively, standardized five-view images of the patients were taken and presented to blinded observers, who were requested to award a numeric score to the aesthetic outcome. The numeric scores then were analyzed statistically. An experimental group of 11 patients who underwent reconstruction using the modified/improved technique were compared with a control group of 17 patients who underwent reconstruction using the classic technique. The incidences of complications for the two groups were compared and analyzed as well. Results The two groups of patients were comparable in terms of their age distribution and incidences of donor site and recipient site complications. A statistically significant difference was noted between the aesthetic scores awarded to patients who underwent surgery using the improved technique and those awarded to those who underwent surgery using the classic technique (p = 0.0006). Conclusion A model is presented for statistical analysis of the aesthetic outcome for breast reconstruction using an improved TRAM flap design as compared with using a classic TRAM flap design. This model offers an evidence-based decision-making process and uses the principle of aesthetic breast surgery adapted to breast reconstruction. On the basis of this model, the authors conclude that the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction can be improved by attention to details such as better projection of the breast’s lower pole, improved sculpting of the submammary fold, and attention to filling contour deficits of the axilla after axillary clearance. Axillary dissection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Axillary tail (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast projection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast reconstruction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Submammary fold (dpeaa)DE-He213 TRAM flap (dpeaa)DE-He213 Potgieter, Estelle aut Becker, Piet J. aut Enthalten in Aesthetic plastic surgery New York, NY : Springer, 1976 30(2006), 3 vom: 01. Juni, Seite 301-308 (DE-627)254630758 (DE-600)1462126-5 1432-5241 nnns volume:30 year:2006 number:3 day:01 month:06 pages:301-308 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-005-0147-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 30 2006 3 01 06 301-308
allfieldsSound	10.1007/s00266-005-0147-4 doi (DE-627)SPR003332551 (SPR)s00266-005-0147-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Fayman, Moshe S. verfasserin aut The Pedicle Tram Flap: A Focus on Improved Aesthetic Outcome 2006 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006 Background The transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap technique is the most versatile and artistic procedure currently used for breast reconstruction. Several variations have been described in the past with regard to the aesthetic objectives of reconstruction and the technical steps to achieve these goals. This study aimed to analyze changes introduced by the authors to improve the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction using the pedicle TRAM flap in terms of three specific aesthetic goals: (1) better definition of the submammary fold, (2) improved reconstruction of the tail of the breast and anterior axillary wall after axillary clearance, and (3) improved projection of the lower pole of the reconstructed breast. Methods The design of the pedicle flap has been modified to accommodate four surgical scenarios: vertical orientations of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle and horizontal orientation of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle. In each of these variations, specific surgical steps were undertaken to produce extension of the flap into the axilla, better definition of the submammary fold, and folding of the flap in its lower part to increase lower pole projection. Postoperatively, standardized five-view images of the patients were taken and presented to blinded observers, who were requested to award a numeric score to the aesthetic outcome. The numeric scores then were analyzed statistically. An experimental group of 11 patients who underwent reconstruction using the modified/improved technique were compared with a control group of 17 patients who underwent reconstruction using the classic technique. The incidences of complications for the two groups were compared and analyzed as well. Results The two groups of patients were comparable in terms of their age distribution and incidences of donor site and recipient site complications. A statistically significant difference was noted between the aesthetic scores awarded to patients who underwent surgery using the improved technique and those awarded to those who underwent surgery using the classic technique (p = 0.0006). Conclusion A model is presented for statistical analysis of the aesthetic outcome for breast reconstruction using an improved TRAM flap design as compared with using a classic TRAM flap design. This model offers an evidence-based decision-making process and uses the principle of aesthetic breast surgery adapted to breast reconstruction. On the basis of this model, the authors conclude that the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction can be improved by attention to details such as better projection of the breast’s lower pole, improved sculpting of the submammary fold, and attention to filling contour deficits of the axilla after axillary clearance. Axillary dissection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Axillary tail (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast projection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast reconstruction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Submammary fold (dpeaa)DE-He213 TRAM flap (dpeaa)DE-He213 Potgieter, Estelle aut Becker, Piet J. aut Enthalten in Aesthetic plastic surgery New York, NY : Springer, 1976 30(2006), 3 vom: 01. Juni, Seite 301-308 (DE-627)254630758 (DE-600)1462126-5 1432-5241 nnns volume:30 year:2006 number:3 day:01 month:06 pages:301-308 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-005-0147-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 30 2006 3 01 06 301-308
language	English
source	Enthalten in Aesthetic plastic surgery 30(2006), 3 vom: 01. Juni, Seite 301-308 volume:30 year:2006 number:3 day:01 month:06 pages:301-308
sourceStr	Enthalten in Aesthetic plastic surgery 30(2006), 3 vom: 01. Juni, Seite 301-308 volume:30 year:2006 number:3 day:01 month:06 pages:301-308
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Axillary dissection Axillary tail Breast projection Breast reconstruction Submammary fold TRAM flap
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Aesthetic plastic surgery
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Fayman, Moshe S. @@aut@@ Potgieter, Estelle @@aut@@ Becker, Piet J. @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2006-06-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	254630758
id	SPR003332551
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR003332551</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519155436.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201001s2006 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00266-005-0147-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR003332551</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00266-005-0147-4-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fayman, Moshe S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Pedicle Tram Flap: A Focus on Improved Aesthetic Outcome</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background The transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap technique is the most versatile and artistic procedure currently used for breast reconstruction. Several variations have been described in the past with regard to the aesthetic objectives of reconstruction and the technical steps to achieve these goals. This study aimed to analyze changes introduced by the authors to improve the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction using the pedicle TRAM flap in terms of three specific aesthetic goals: (1) better definition of the submammary fold, (2) improved reconstruction of the tail of the breast and anterior axillary wall after axillary clearance, and (3) improved projection of the lower pole of the reconstructed breast. Methods The design of the pedicle flap has been modified to accommodate four surgical scenarios: vertical orientations of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle and horizontal orientation of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle. In each of these variations, specific surgical steps were undertaken to produce extension of the flap into the axilla, better definition of the submammary fold, and folding of the flap in its lower part to increase lower pole projection. Postoperatively, standardized five-view images of the patients were taken and presented to blinded observers, who were requested to award a numeric score to the aesthetic outcome. The numeric scores then were analyzed statistically. An experimental group of 11 patients who underwent reconstruction using the modified/improved technique were compared with a control group of 17 patients who underwent reconstruction using the classic technique. The incidences of complications for the two groups were compared and analyzed as well. Results The two groups of patients were comparable in terms of their age distribution and incidences of donor site and recipient site complications. A statistically significant difference was noted between the aesthetic scores awarded to patients who underwent surgery using the improved technique and those awarded to those who underwent surgery using the classic technique (p = 0.0006). Conclusion A model is presented for statistical analysis of the aesthetic outcome for breast reconstruction using an improved TRAM flap design as compared with using a classic TRAM flap design. This model offers an evidence-based decision-making process and uses the principle of aesthetic breast surgery adapted to breast reconstruction. On the basis of this model, the authors conclude that the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction can be improved by attention to details such as better projection of the breast’s lower pole, improved sculpting of the submammary fold, and attention to filling contour deficits of the axilla after axillary clearance.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Axillary dissection</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Axillary tail</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Breast projection</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Breast reconstruction</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Submammary fold</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">TRAM flap</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Potgieter, Estelle</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Becker, Piet J.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Aesthetic plastic surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Springer, 1976</subfield><subfield code="g">30(2006), 3 vom: 01. Juni, Seite 301-308</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)254630758</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1462126-5</subfield><subfield code="x">1432-5241</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:30</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2006</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:301-308</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-005-0147-4</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_711</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2070</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">30</subfield><subfield code="j">2006</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">301-308</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Fayman, Moshe S.
spellingShingle	Fayman, Moshe S. misc Axillary dissection misc Axillary tail misc Breast projection misc Breast reconstruction misc Submammary fold misc TRAM flap The Pedicle Tram Flap: A Focus on Improved Aesthetic Outcome
authorStr	Fayman, Moshe S.
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)254630758
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1432-5241
topic_title	The Pedicle Tram Flap: A Focus on Improved Aesthetic Outcome Axillary dissection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Axillary tail (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast projection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast reconstruction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Submammary fold (dpeaa)DE-He213 TRAM flap (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	misc Axillary dissection misc Axillary tail misc Breast projection misc Breast reconstruction misc Submammary fold misc TRAM flap
topic_unstemmed	misc Axillary dissection misc Axillary tail misc Breast projection misc Breast reconstruction misc Submammary fold misc TRAM flap
topic_browse	misc Axillary dissection misc Axillary tail misc Breast projection misc Breast reconstruction misc Submammary fold misc TRAM flap
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Aesthetic plastic surgery
hierarchy_parent_id	254630758
hierarchy_top_title	Aesthetic plastic surgery
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)254630758 (DE-600)1462126-5
title	The Pedicle Tram Flap: A Focus on Improved Aesthetic Outcome
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR003332551 (SPR)s00266-005-0147-4-e
title_full	The Pedicle Tram Flap: A Focus on Improved Aesthetic Outcome
author_sort	Fayman, Moshe S.
journal	Aesthetic plastic surgery
journalStr	Aesthetic plastic surgery
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2006
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	301
author_browse	Fayman, Moshe S. Potgieter, Estelle Becker, Piet J.
container_volume	30
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Fayman, Moshe S.
doi_str_mv	10.1007/s00266-005-0147-4
title_sort	pedicle tram flap: a focus on improved aesthetic outcome
title_auth	The Pedicle Tram Flap: A Focus on Improved Aesthetic Outcome
abstract	Background The transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap technique is the most versatile and artistic procedure currently used for breast reconstruction. Several variations have been described in the past with regard to the aesthetic objectives of reconstruction and the technical steps to achieve these goals. This study aimed to analyze changes introduced by the authors to improve the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction using the pedicle TRAM flap in terms of three specific aesthetic goals: (1) better definition of the submammary fold, (2) improved reconstruction of the tail of the breast and anterior axillary wall after axillary clearance, and (3) improved projection of the lower pole of the reconstructed breast. Methods The design of the pedicle flap has been modified to accommodate four surgical scenarios: vertical orientations of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle and horizontal orientation of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle. In each of these variations, specific surgical steps were undertaken to produce extension of the flap into the axilla, better definition of the submammary fold, and folding of the flap in its lower part to increase lower pole projection. Postoperatively, standardized five-view images of the patients were taken and presented to blinded observers, who were requested to award a numeric score to the aesthetic outcome. The numeric scores then were analyzed statistically. An experimental group of 11 patients who underwent reconstruction using the modified/improved technique were compared with a control group of 17 patients who underwent reconstruction using the classic technique. The incidences of complications for the two groups were compared and analyzed as well. Results The two groups of patients were comparable in terms of their age distribution and incidences of donor site and recipient site complications. A statistically significant difference was noted between the aesthetic scores awarded to patients who underwent surgery using the improved technique and those awarded to those who underwent surgery using the classic technique (p = 0.0006). Conclusion A model is presented for statistical analysis of the aesthetic outcome for breast reconstruction using an improved TRAM flap design as compared with using a classic TRAM flap design. This model offers an evidence-based decision-making process and uses the principle of aesthetic breast surgery adapted to breast reconstruction. On the basis of this model, the authors conclude that the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction can be improved by attention to details such as better projection of the breast’s lower pole, improved sculpting of the submammary fold, and attention to filling contour deficits of the axilla after axillary clearance. © Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006
abstractGer	Background The transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap technique is the most versatile and artistic procedure currently used for breast reconstruction. Several variations have been described in the past with regard to the aesthetic objectives of reconstruction and the technical steps to achieve these goals. This study aimed to analyze changes introduced by the authors to improve the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction using the pedicle TRAM flap in terms of three specific aesthetic goals: (1) better definition of the submammary fold, (2) improved reconstruction of the tail of the breast and anterior axillary wall after axillary clearance, and (3) improved projection of the lower pole of the reconstructed breast. Methods The design of the pedicle flap has been modified to accommodate four surgical scenarios: vertical orientations of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle and horizontal orientation of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle. In each of these variations, specific surgical steps were undertaken to produce extension of the flap into the axilla, better definition of the submammary fold, and folding of the flap in its lower part to increase lower pole projection. Postoperatively, standardized five-view images of the patients were taken and presented to blinded observers, who were requested to award a numeric score to the aesthetic outcome. The numeric scores then were analyzed statistically. An experimental group of 11 patients who underwent reconstruction using the modified/improved technique were compared with a control group of 17 patients who underwent reconstruction using the classic technique. The incidences of complications for the two groups were compared and analyzed as well. Results The two groups of patients were comparable in terms of their age distribution and incidences of donor site and recipient site complications. A statistically significant difference was noted between the aesthetic scores awarded to patients who underwent surgery using the improved technique and those awarded to those who underwent surgery using the classic technique (p = 0.0006). Conclusion A model is presented for statistical analysis of the aesthetic outcome for breast reconstruction using an improved TRAM flap design as compared with using a classic TRAM flap design. This model offers an evidence-based decision-making process and uses the principle of aesthetic breast surgery adapted to breast reconstruction. On the basis of this model, the authors conclude that the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction can be improved by attention to details such as better projection of the breast’s lower pole, improved sculpting of the submammary fold, and attention to filling contour deficits of the axilla after axillary clearance. © Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006
abstract_unstemmed	Background The transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap technique is the most versatile and artistic procedure currently used for breast reconstruction. Several variations have been described in the past with regard to the aesthetic objectives of reconstruction and the technical steps to achieve these goals. This study aimed to analyze changes introduced by the authors to improve the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction using the pedicle TRAM flap in terms of three specific aesthetic goals: (1) better definition of the submammary fold, (2) improved reconstruction of the tail of the breast and anterior axillary wall after axillary clearance, and (3) improved projection of the lower pole of the reconstructed breast. Methods The design of the pedicle flap has been modified to accommodate four surgical scenarios: vertical orientations of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle and horizontal orientation of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle. In each of these variations, specific surgical steps were undertaken to produce extension of the flap into the axilla, better definition of the submammary fold, and folding of the flap in its lower part to increase lower pole projection. Postoperatively, standardized five-view images of the patients were taken and presented to blinded observers, who were requested to award a numeric score to the aesthetic outcome. The numeric scores then were analyzed statistically. An experimental group of 11 patients who underwent reconstruction using the modified/improved technique were compared with a control group of 17 patients who underwent reconstruction using the classic technique. The incidences of complications for the two groups were compared and analyzed as well. Results The two groups of patients were comparable in terms of their age distribution and incidences of donor site and recipient site complications. A statistically significant difference was noted between the aesthetic scores awarded to patients who underwent surgery using the improved technique and those awarded to those who underwent surgery using the classic technique (p = 0.0006). Conclusion A model is presented for statistical analysis of the aesthetic outcome for breast reconstruction using an improved TRAM flap design as compared with using a classic TRAM flap design. This model offers an evidence-based decision-making process and uses the principle of aesthetic breast surgery adapted to breast reconstruction. On the basis of this model, the authors conclude that the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction can be improved by attention to details such as better projection of the breast’s lower pole, improved sculpting of the submammary fold, and attention to filling contour deficits of the axilla after axillary clearance. © Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	3
title_short	The Pedicle Tram Flap: A Focus on Improved Aesthetic Outcome
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-005-0147-4
remote_bool	true
author2	Potgieter, Estelle Becker, Piet J.
author2Str	Potgieter, Estelle Becker, Piet J.
ppnlink	254630758
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1007/s00266-005-0147-4
up_date	2024-07-03T18:52:22.917Z
_version_	1803585053439033344
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR003332551</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519155436.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201001s2006 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00266-005-0147-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR003332551</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00266-005-0147-4-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fayman, Moshe S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Pedicle Tram Flap: A Focus on Improved Aesthetic Outcome</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background The transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap technique is the most versatile and artistic procedure currently used for breast reconstruction. Several variations have been described in the past with regard to the aesthetic objectives of reconstruction and the technical steps to achieve these goals. This study aimed to analyze changes introduced by the authors to improve the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction using the pedicle TRAM flap in terms of three specific aesthetic goals: (1) better definition of the submammary fold, (2) improved reconstruction of the tail of the breast and anterior axillary wall after axillary clearance, and (3) improved projection of the lower pole of the reconstructed breast. Methods The design of the pedicle flap has been modified to accommodate four surgical scenarios: vertical orientations of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle and horizontal orientation of the flap with either an ipsi or contralateral pedicle. In each of these variations, specific surgical steps were undertaken to produce extension of the flap into the axilla, better definition of the submammary fold, and folding of the flap in its lower part to increase lower pole projection. Postoperatively, standardized five-view images of the patients were taken and presented to blinded observers, who were requested to award a numeric score to the aesthetic outcome. The numeric scores then were analyzed statistically. An experimental group of 11 patients who underwent reconstruction using the modified/improved technique were compared with a control group of 17 patients who underwent reconstruction using the classic technique. The incidences of complications for the two groups were compared and analyzed as well. Results The two groups of patients were comparable in terms of their age distribution and incidences of donor site and recipient site complications. A statistically significant difference was noted between the aesthetic scores awarded to patients who underwent surgery using the improved technique and those awarded to those who underwent surgery using the classic technique (p = 0.0006). Conclusion A model is presented for statistical analysis of the aesthetic outcome for breast reconstruction using an improved TRAM flap design as compared with using a classic TRAM flap design. This model offers an evidence-based decision-making process and uses the principle of aesthetic breast surgery adapted to breast reconstruction. On the basis of this model, the authors conclude that the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction can be improved by attention to details such as better projection of the breast’s lower pole, improved sculpting of the submammary fold, and attention to filling contour deficits of the axilla after axillary clearance.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Axillary dissection</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Axillary tail</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Breast projection</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Breast reconstruction</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Submammary fold</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">TRAM flap</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Potgieter, Estelle</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Becker, Piet J.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Aesthetic plastic surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Springer, 1976</subfield><subfield code="g">30(2006), 3 vom: 01. Juni, Seite 301-308</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)254630758</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1462126-5</subfield><subfield code="x">1432-5241</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:30</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2006</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:301-308</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-005-0147-4</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_711</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2070</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">30</subfield><subfield code="j">2006</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">301-308</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4003525

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

The Pedicle Tram Flap: A Focus on Improved Aesthetic Outcome

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?