Significance of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
Background Lymph node metastasis is common in patients with colorectal cancer. Its significance in patients at the time of primary colorectal surgery and later in patients who develop colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC) is unknown. Lymphatic metastasis reflects a systemic spread of ca...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Chua, Terence C. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2009 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2009 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: World Journal of Surgery - Springer-Verlag, 1996, 33(2009), 7 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 1488-1494 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:33 ; year:2009 ; number:7 ; day:02 ; month:05 ; pages:1488-1494 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s00268-009-0059-6 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR003423573 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR003423573 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230328140018.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201001s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00268-009-0059-6 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR003423573 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s00268-009-0059-6-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Chua, Terence C. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Significance of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Carcinomatosis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2009 | ||
| 520 | |a Background Lymph node metastasis is common in patients with colorectal cancer. Its significance in patients at the time of primary colorectal surgery and later in patients who develop colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC) is unknown. Lymphatic metastasis reflects a systemic spread of cancer and its implication on patients who undergo cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) for carcinomatosis needs to be studied. Methods Patients with CRPC underwent CRS and PIC according to a standardized treatment protocol in our institution. Pathology reports from the primary colorectal surgery and at the time of treatment for CRPC was retrospectively retrieved and appraised. Comparison of survival outcomes using the log-rank test was performed for patients with and without lymphatic metastasis. Results Sixty patients were treated for CRPC with CRS and PIC. At the time of colorectal surgery, patients with lymph node involvement had similar survival outcomes compared with patients without lymph node involvement (median survival: 31 months, 36 months; p = 0.9). However, when they subsequently develop peritoneal carcinomatosis and underwent treatment with CRS and PIC, patients with lymph node involvement did significantly worse (median survival: 20 months, 38 months; p = 0.003). Conclusions The results of our study suggest that lymph node metastasis in patients with CRPC is an indicator of a poor prognosis and requires further investigation and recognition. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Peritoneal Carcinomatosis |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Peritoneal Cancer Index |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Complete Cytoreduction |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Peritonectomy Procedure |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yan, Tristan D. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ng, Keh M. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhao, Jing |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Morris, David L. |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t World Journal of Surgery |d Springer-Verlag, 1996 |g 33(2009), 7 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 1488-1494 |w (DE-627)SPR003391159 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2009 |g number:7 |g day:02 |g month:05 |g pages:1488-1494 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0059-6 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 33 |j 2009 |e 7 |b 02 |c 05 |h 1488-1494 | ||
| author_variant |
t c c tc tcc t d y td tdy k m n km kmn j z jz d l m dl dlm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
chuaterencecyantristandngkehmzhaojingmor:2009----:infcnefypndmtsaiiptetwtclrcacne |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2009 |
| publishDate |
2009 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s00268-009-0059-6 doi (DE-627)SPR003423573 (SPR)s00268-009-0059-6-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Chua, Terence C. verfasserin aut Significance of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Carcinomatosis 2009 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2009 Background Lymph node metastasis is common in patients with colorectal cancer. Its significance in patients at the time of primary colorectal surgery and later in patients who develop colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC) is unknown. Lymphatic metastasis reflects a systemic spread of cancer and its implication on patients who undergo cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) for carcinomatosis needs to be studied. Methods Patients with CRPC underwent CRS and PIC according to a standardized treatment protocol in our institution. Pathology reports from the primary colorectal surgery and at the time of treatment for CRPC was retrospectively retrieved and appraised. Comparison of survival outcomes using the log-rank test was performed for patients with and without lymphatic metastasis. Results Sixty patients were treated for CRPC with CRS and PIC. At the time of colorectal surgery, patients with lymph node involvement had similar survival outcomes compared with patients without lymph node involvement (median survival: 31 months, 36 months; p = 0.9). However, when they subsequently develop peritoneal carcinomatosis and underwent treatment with CRS and PIC, patients with lymph node involvement did significantly worse (median survival: 20 months, 38 months; p = 0.003). Conclusions The results of our study suggest that lymph node metastasis in patients with CRPC is an indicator of a poor prognosis and requires further investigation and recognition. Peritoneal Carcinomatosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Peritoneal Cancer Index (dpeaa)DE-He213 Complete Cytoreduction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Peritonectomy Procedure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Yan, Tristan D. aut Ng, Keh M. aut Zhao, Jing aut Morris, David L. aut Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 1996 33(2009), 7 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 1488-1494 (DE-627)SPR003391159 nnns volume:33 year:2009 number:7 day:02 month:05 pages:1488-1494 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0059-6 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 33 2009 7 02 05 1488-1494 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s00268-009-0059-6 doi (DE-627)SPR003423573 (SPR)s00268-009-0059-6-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Chua, Terence C. verfasserin aut Significance of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Carcinomatosis 2009 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2009 Background Lymph node metastasis is common in patients with colorectal cancer. Its significance in patients at the time of primary colorectal surgery and later in patients who develop colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC) is unknown. Lymphatic metastasis reflects a systemic spread of cancer and its implication on patients who undergo cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) for carcinomatosis needs to be studied. Methods Patients with CRPC underwent CRS and PIC according to a standardized treatment protocol in our institution. Pathology reports from the primary colorectal surgery and at the time of treatment for CRPC was retrospectively retrieved and appraised. Comparison of survival outcomes using the log-rank test was performed for patients with and without lymphatic metastasis. Results Sixty patients were treated for CRPC with CRS and PIC. At the time of colorectal surgery, patients with lymph node involvement had similar survival outcomes compared with patients without lymph node involvement (median survival: 31 months, 36 months; p = 0.9). However, when they subsequently develop peritoneal carcinomatosis and underwent treatment with CRS and PIC, patients with lymph node involvement did significantly worse (median survival: 20 months, 38 months; p = 0.003). Conclusions The results of our study suggest that lymph node metastasis in patients with CRPC is an indicator of a poor prognosis and requires further investigation and recognition. Peritoneal Carcinomatosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Peritoneal Cancer Index (dpeaa)DE-He213 Complete Cytoreduction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Peritonectomy Procedure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Yan, Tristan D. aut Ng, Keh M. aut Zhao, Jing aut Morris, David L. aut Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 1996 33(2009), 7 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 1488-1494 (DE-627)SPR003391159 nnns volume:33 year:2009 number:7 day:02 month:05 pages:1488-1494 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0059-6 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 33 2009 7 02 05 1488-1494 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s00268-009-0059-6 doi (DE-627)SPR003423573 (SPR)s00268-009-0059-6-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Chua, Terence C. verfasserin aut Significance of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Carcinomatosis 2009 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2009 Background Lymph node metastasis is common in patients with colorectal cancer. Its significance in patients at the time of primary colorectal surgery and later in patients who develop colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC) is unknown. Lymphatic metastasis reflects a systemic spread of cancer and its implication on patients who undergo cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) for carcinomatosis needs to be studied. Methods Patients with CRPC underwent CRS and PIC according to a standardized treatment protocol in our institution. Pathology reports from the primary colorectal surgery and at the time of treatment for CRPC was retrospectively retrieved and appraised. Comparison of survival outcomes using the log-rank test was performed for patients with and without lymphatic metastasis. Results Sixty patients were treated for CRPC with CRS and PIC. At the time of colorectal surgery, patients with lymph node involvement had similar survival outcomes compared with patients without lymph node involvement (median survival: 31 months, 36 months; p = 0.9). However, when they subsequently develop peritoneal carcinomatosis and underwent treatment with CRS and PIC, patients with lymph node involvement did significantly worse (median survival: 20 months, 38 months; p = 0.003). Conclusions The results of our study suggest that lymph node metastasis in patients with CRPC is an indicator of a poor prognosis and requires further investigation and recognition. Peritoneal Carcinomatosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Peritoneal Cancer Index (dpeaa)DE-He213 Complete Cytoreduction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Peritonectomy Procedure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Yan, Tristan D. aut Ng, Keh M. aut Zhao, Jing aut Morris, David L. aut Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 1996 33(2009), 7 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 1488-1494 (DE-627)SPR003391159 nnns volume:33 year:2009 number:7 day:02 month:05 pages:1488-1494 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0059-6 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 33 2009 7 02 05 1488-1494 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s00268-009-0059-6 doi (DE-627)SPR003423573 (SPR)s00268-009-0059-6-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Chua, Terence C. verfasserin aut Significance of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Carcinomatosis 2009 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2009 Background Lymph node metastasis is common in patients with colorectal cancer. Its significance in patients at the time of primary colorectal surgery and later in patients who develop colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC) is unknown. Lymphatic metastasis reflects a systemic spread of cancer and its implication on patients who undergo cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) for carcinomatosis needs to be studied. Methods Patients with CRPC underwent CRS and PIC according to a standardized treatment protocol in our institution. Pathology reports from the primary colorectal surgery and at the time of treatment for CRPC was retrospectively retrieved and appraised. Comparison of survival outcomes using the log-rank test was performed for patients with and without lymphatic metastasis. Results Sixty patients were treated for CRPC with CRS and PIC. At the time of colorectal surgery, patients with lymph node involvement had similar survival outcomes compared with patients without lymph node involvement (median survival: 31 months, 36 months; p = 0.9). However, when they subsequently develop peritoneal carcinomatosis and underwent treatment with CRS and PIC, patients with lymph node involvement did significantly worse (median survival: 20 months, 38 months; p = 0.003). Conclusions The results of our study suggest that lymph node metastasis in patients with CRPC is an indicator of a poor prognosis and requires further investigation and recognition. Peritoneal Carcinomatosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Peritoneal Cancer Index (dpeaa)DE-He213 Complete Cytoreduction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Peritonectomy Procedure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Yan, Tristan D. aut Ng, Keh M. aut Zhao, Jing aut Morris, David L. aut Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 1996 33(2009), 7 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 1488-1494 (DE-627)SPR003391159 nnns volume:33 year:2009 number:7 day:02 month:05 pages:1488-1494 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0059-6 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 33 2009 7 02 05 1488-1494 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s00268-009-0059-6 doi (DE-627)SPR003423573 (SPR)s00268-009-0059-6-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Chua, Terence C. verfasserin aut Significance of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Carcinomatosis 2009 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2009 Background Lymph node metastasis is common in patients with colorectal cancer. Its significance in patients at the time of primary colorectal surgery and later in patients who develop colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC) is unknown. Lymphatic metastasis reflects a systemic spread of cancer and its implication on patients who undergo cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) for carcinomatosis needs to be studied. Methods Patients with CRPC underwent CRS and PIC according to a standardized treatment protocol in our institution. Pathology reports from the primary colorectal surgery and at the time of treatment for CRPC was retrospectively retrieved and appraised. Comparison of survival outcomes using the log-rank test was performed for patients with and without lymphatic metastasis. Results Sixty patients were treated for CRPC with CRS and PIC. At the time of colorectal surgery, patients with lymph node involvement had similar survival outcomes compared with patients without lymph node involvement (median survival: 31 months, 36 months; p = 0.9). However, when they subsequently develop peritoneal carcinomatosis and underwent treatment with CRS and PIC, patients with lymph node involvement did significantly worse (median survival: 20 months, 38 months; p = 0.003). Conclusions The results of our study suggest that lymph node metastasis in patients with CRPC is an indicator of a poor prognosis and requires further investigation and recognition. Peritoneal Carcinomatosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Peritoneal Cancer Index (dpeaa)DE-He213 Complete Cytoreduction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Peritonectomy Procedure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Yan, Tristan D. aut Ng, Keh M. aut Zhao, Jing aut Morris, David L. aut Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 1996 33(2009), 7 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 1488-1494 (DE-627)SPR003391159 nnns volume:33 year:2009 number:7 day:02 month:05 pages:1488-1494 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0059-6 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 33 2009 7 02 05 1488-1494 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery 33(2009), 7 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 1488-1494 volume:33 year:2009 number:7 day:02 month:05 pages:1488-1494 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery 33(2009), 7 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 1488-1494 volume:33 year:2009 number:7 day:02 month:05 pages:1488-1494 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Peritoneal Cancer Index Complete Cytoreduction Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Peritonectomy Procedure |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
World Journal of Surgery |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Chua, Terence C. @@aut@@ Yan, Tristan D. @@aut@@ Ng, Keh M. @@aut@@ Zhao, Jing @@aut@@ Morris, David L. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2009-05-02T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR003391159 |
| id |
SPR003423573 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR003423573</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328140018.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201001s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00268-009-0059-6</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR003423573</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00268-009-0059-6-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chua, Terence C.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Significance of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Carcinomatosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Lymph node metastasis is common in patients with colorectal cancer. Its significance in patients at the time of primary colorectal surgery and later in patients who develop colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC) is unknown. Lymphatic metastasis reflects a systemic spread of cancer and its implication on patients who undergo cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) for carcinomatosis needs to be studied. Methods Patients with CRPC underwent CRS and PIC according to a standardized treatment protocol in our institution. Pathology reports from the primary colorectal surgery and at the time of treatment for CRPC was retrospectively retrieved and appraised. Comparison of survival outcomes using the log-rank test was performed for patients with and without lymphatic metastasis. Results Sixty patients were treated for CRPC with CRS and PIC. At the time of colorectal surgery, patients with lymph node involvement had similar survival outcomes compared with patients without lymph node involvement (median survival: 31 months, 36 months; p = 0.9). However, when they subsequently develop peritoneal carcinomatosis and underwent treatment with CRS and PIC, patients with lymph node involvement did significantly worse (median survival: 20 months, 38 months; p = 0.003). Conclusions The results of our study suggest that lymph node metastasis in patients with CRPC is an indicator of a poor prognosis and requires further investigation and recognition.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Peritoneal Carcinomatosis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Peritoneal Cancer Index</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Complete Cytoreduction</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Peritonectomy Procedure</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yan, Tristan D.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ng, Keh M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhao, Jing</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Morris, David L.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">World Journal of Surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">33(2009), 7 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 1488-1494</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR003391159</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:33</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2009</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1488-1494</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0059-6</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">33</subfield><subfield code="j">2009</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">1488-1494</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Chua, Terence C. |
| spellingShingle |
Chua, Terence C. misc Peritoneal Carcinomatosis misc Peritoneal Cancer Index misc Complete Cytoreduction misc Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy misc Peritonectomy Procedure Significance of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Carcinomatosis |
| authorStr |
Chua, Terence C. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR003391159 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Significance of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Peritoneal Carcinomatosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Peritoneal Cancer Index (dpeaa)DE-He213 Complete Cytoreduction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Peritonectomy Procedure (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Peritoneal Carcinomatosis misc Peritoneal Cancer Index misc Complete Cytoreduction misc Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy misc Peritonectomy Procedure |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Peritoneal Carcinomatosis misc Peritoneal Cancer Index misc Complete Cytoreduction misc Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy misc Peritonectomy Procedure |
| topic_browse |
misc Peritoneal Carcinomatosis misc Peritoneal Cancer Index misc Complete Cytoreduction misc Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy misc Peritonectomy Procedure |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
World Journal of Surgery |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR003391159 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
World Journal of Surgery |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR003391159 |
| title |
Significance of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Carcinomatosis |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR003423573 (SPR)s00268-009-0059-6-e |
| title_full |
Significance of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Carcinomatosis |
| author_sort |
Chua, Terence C. |
| journal |
World Journal of Surgery |
| journalStr |
World Journal of Surgery |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2009 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1488 |
| author_browse |
Chua, Terence C. Yan, Tristan D. Ng, Keh M. Zhao, Jing Morris, David L. |
| container_volume |
33 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Chua, Terence C. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s00268-009-0059-6 |
| title_sort |
significance of lymph node metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis |
| title_auth |
Significance of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Carcinomatosis |
| abstract |
Background Lymph node metastasis is common in patients with colorectal cancer. Its significance in patients at the time of primary colorectal surgery and later in patients who develop colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC) is unknown. Lymphatic metastasis reflects a systemic spread of cancer and its implication on patients who undergo cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) for carcinomatosis needs to be studied. Methods Patients with CRPC underwent CRS and PIC according to a standardized treatment protocol in our institution. Pathology reports from the primary colorectal surgery and at the time of treatment for CRPC was retrospectively retrieved and appraised. Comparison of survival outcomes using the log-rank test was performed for patients with and without lymphatic metastasis. Results Sixty patients were treated for CRPC with CRS and PIC. At the time of colorectal surgery, patients with lymph node involvement had similar survival outcomes compared with patients without lymph node involvement (median survival: 31 months, 36 months; p = 0.9). However, when they subsequently develop peritoneal carcinomatosis and underwent treatment with CRS and PIC, patients with lymph node involvement did significantly worse (median survival: 20 months, 38 months; p = 0.003). Conclusions The results of our study suggest that lymph node metastasis in patients with CRPC is an indicator of a poor prognosis and requires further investigation and recognition. © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2009 |
| abstractGer |
Background Lymph node metastasis is common in patients with colorectal cancer. Its significance in patients at the time of primary colorectal surgery and later in patients who develop colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC) is unknown. Lymphatic metastasis reflects a systemic spread of cancer and its implication on patients who undergo cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) for carcinomatosis needs to be studied. Methods Patients with CRPC underwent CRS and PIC according to a standardized treatment protocol in our institution. Pathology reports from the primary colorectal surgery and at the time of treatment for CRPC was retrospectively retrieved and appraised. Comparison of survival outcomes using the log-rank test was performed for patients with and without lymphatic metastasis. Results Sixty patients were treated for CRPC with CRS and PIC. At the time of colorectal surgery, patients with lymph node involvement had similar survival outcomes compared with patients without lymph node involvement (median survival: 31 months, 36 months; p = 0.9). However, when they subsequently develop peritoneal carcinomatosis and underwent treatment with CRS and PIC, patients with lymph node involvement did significantly worse (median survival: 20 months, 38 months; p = 0.003). Conclusions The results of our study suggest that lymph node metastasis in patients with CRPC is an indicator of a poor prognosis and requires further investigation and recognition. © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2009 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Background Lymph node metastasis is common in patients with colorectal cancer. Its significance in patients at the time of primary colorectal surgery and later in patients who develop colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC) is unknown. Lymphatic metastasis reflects a systemic spread of cancer and its implication on patients who undergo cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) for carcinomatosis needs to be studied. Methods Patients with CRPC underwent CRS and PIC according to a standardized treatment protocol in our institution. Pathology reports from the primary colorectal surgery and at the time of treatment for CRPC was retrospectively retrieved and appraised. Comparison of survival outcomes using the log-rank test was performed for patients with and without lymphatic metastasis. Results Sixty patients were treated for CRPC with CRS and PIC. At the time of colorectal surgery, patients with lymph node involvement had similar survival outcomes compared with patients without lymph node involvement (median survival: 31 months, 36 months; p = 0.9). However, when they subsequently develop peritoneal carcinomatosis and underwent treatment with CRS and PIC, patients with lymph node involvement did significantly worse (median survival: 20 months, 38 months; p = 0.003). Conclusions The results of our study suggest that lymph node metastasis in patients with CRPC is an indicator of a poor prognosis and requires further investigation and recognition. © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2009 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
7 |
| title_short |
Significance of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Carcinomatosis |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0059-6 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Yan, Tristan D. Ng, Keh M. Zhao, Jing Morris, David L. |
| author2Str |
Yan, Tristan D. Ng, Keh M. Zhao, Jing Morris, David L. |
| ppnlink |
SPR003391159 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s00268-009-0059-6 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T19:25:25.443Z |
| _version_ |
1803587132267167744 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR003423573</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328140018.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201001s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00268-009-0059-6</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR003423573</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00268-009-0059-6-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chua, Terence C.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Significance of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Carcinomatosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Lymph node metastasis is common in patients with colorectal cancer. Its significance in patients at the time of primary colorectal surgery and later in patients who develop colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC) is unknown. Lymphatic metastasis reflects a systemic spread of cancer and its implication on patients who undergo cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) for carcinomatosis needs to be studied. Methods Patients with CRPC underwent CRS and PIC according to a standardized treatment protocol in our institution. Pathology reports from the primary colorectal surgery and at the time of treatment for CRPC was retrospectively retrieved and appraised. Comparison of survival outcomes using the log-rank test was performed for patients with and without lymphatic metastasis. Results Sixty patients were treated for CRPC with CRS and PIC. At the time of colorectal surgery, patients with lymph node involvement had similar survival outcomes compared with patients without lymph node involvement (median survival: 31 months, 36 months; p = 0.9). However, when they subsequently develop peritoneal carcinomatosis and underwent treatment with CRS and PIC, patients with lymph node involvement did significantly worse (median survival: 20 months, 38 months; p = 0.003). Conclusions The results of our study suggest that lymph node metastasis in patients with CRPC is an indicator of a poor prognosis and requires further investigation and recognition.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Peritoneal Carcinomatosis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Peritoneal Cancer Index</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Complete Cytoreduction</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Peritonectomy Procedure</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yan, Tristan D.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ng, Keh M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhao, Jing</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Morris, David L.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">World Journal of Surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">33(2009), 7 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 1488-1494</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR003391159</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:33</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2009</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1488-1494</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0059-6</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">33</subfield><subfield code="j">2009</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">1488-1494</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4028063 |