A Review of Surgical Informed Consent: Past, Present, and Future. A Quest to Help Patients Make Better Decisions
Background Informed consent (IC) is a process requiring a competent doctor, adequate transfer of information, and consent of the patient. It is not just a signature on a piece of paper. Current consent processes in surgery are probably outdated and may require major changes to adjust them to modern...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Leclercq, Wouter K. G. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2010 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2010 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: World Journal of Surgery - Springer-Verlag, 1996, 34(2010), 7 vom: 07. Apr., Seite 1406-1415 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:34 ; year:2010 ; number:7 ; day:07 ; month:04 ; pages:1406-1415 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR003428842 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR003428842 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230328140034.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201001s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR003428842 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s00268-010-0542-0-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Leclercq, Wouter K. G. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Review of Surgical Informed Consent: Past, Present, and Future. A Quest to Help Patients Make Better Decisions |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s) 2010 | ||
| 520 | |a Background Informed consent (IC) is a process requiring a competent doctor, adequate transfer of information, and consent of the patient. It is not just a signature on a piece of paper. Current consent processes in surgery are probably outdated and may require major changes to adjust them to modern day legislation. A literature search may provide an opportunity for enhancing the quality of the surgical IC (SIC) process. Methods Relevant English literature obtained from PubMed, Picarta, PsycINFO, and Google between 1993 and 2009 was reviewed. Results The body of literature with respect to SIC is slim and of moderate quality. The SIC process is an underestimated part of surgery and neither surgeons nor patients sufficiently realize its importance. Surgeons are not specifically trained and lack the competence to guide patients through a legally correct SIC process. Computerized programs can support the SIC process significantly but are rarely used for this purpose. Conclusions IC should be integrated into our surgical practice. Unfortunately, a big gap exists between the theoretical/legal best practice and the daily practice of IC. An optimally informed patient will have more realistic expectations regarding a surgical procedure and its associated risks. Well-informed patients will be more satisfied and file fewer legal claims. The use of interactive computer-based programs provides opportunities to improve the SIC process. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Informed Consent Form |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Informed Consent Process |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Nazi Concentration Camp |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Adequate Informed Consent |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Flash Movie |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Keulers, Bram J. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Scheltinga, Marc R. M. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Spauwen, Paul H. M. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a van der Wilt, Gert-Jan |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t World Journal of Surgery |d Springer-Verlag, 1996 |g 34(2010), 7 vom: 07. Apr., Seite 1406-1415 |w (DE-627)SPR003391159 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:34 |g year:2010 |g number:7 |g day:07 |g month:04 |g pages:1406-1415 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 34 |j 2010 |e 7 |b 07 |c 04 |h 1406-1415 | ||
| author_variant |
w k g l wkg wkgl b j k bj bjk m r m s mrm mrms p h m s phm phms d w g j v dwgj dwgjv |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
leclercqwouterkgkeulersbramjscheltingama:2010----:rveosriaifrecnetatrsnaduueqetoepa |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2010 |
| publishDate |
2010 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0 doi (DE-627)SPR003428842 (SPR)s00268-010-0542-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Leclercq, Wouter K. G. verfasserin aut A Review of Surgical Informed Consent: Past, Present, and Future. A Quest to Help Patients Make Better Decisions 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2010 Background Informed consent (IC) is a process requiring a competent doctor, adequate transfer of information, and consent of the patient. It is not just a signature on a piece of paper. Current consent processes in surgery are probably outdated and may require major changes to adjust them to modern day legislation. A literature search may provide an opportunity for enhancing the quality of the surgical IC (SIC) process. Methods Relevant English literature obtained from PubMed, Picarta, PsycINFO, and Google between 1993 and 2009 was reviewed. Results The body of literature with respect to SIC is slim and of moderate quality. The SIC process is an underestimated part of surgery and neither surgeons nor patients sufficiently realize its importance. Surgeons are not specifically trained and lack the competence to guide patients through a legally correct SIC process. Computerized programs can support the SIC process significantly but are rarely used for this purpose. Conclusions IC should be integrated into our surgical practice. Unfortunately, a big gap exists between the theoretical/legal best practice and the daily practice of IC. An optimally informed patient will have more realistic expectations regarding a surgical procedure and its associated risks. Well-informed patients will be more satisfied and file fewer legal claims. The use of interactive computer-based programs provides opportunities to improve the SIC process. Informed Consent Form (dpeaa)DE-He213 Informed Consent Process (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nazi Concentration Camp (dpeaa)DE-He213 Adequate Informed Consent (dpeaa)DE-He213 Flash Movie (dpeaa)DE-He213 Keulers, Bram J. aut Scheltinga, Marc R. M. aut Spauwen, Paul H. M. aut van der Wilt, Gert-Jan aut Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 1996 34(2010), 7 vom: 07. Apr., Seite 1406-1415 (DE-627)SPR003391159 nnns volume:34 year:2010 number:7 day:07 month:04 pages:1406-1415 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 34 2010 7 07 04 1406-1415 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0 doi (DE-627)SPR003428842 (SPR)s00268-010-0542-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Leclercq, Wouter K. G. verfasserin aut A Review of Surgical Informed Consent: Past, Present, and Future. A Quest to Help Patients Make Better Decisions 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2010 Background Informed consent (IC) is a process requiring a competent doctor, adequate transfer of information, and consent of the patient. It is not just a signature on a piece of paper. Current consent processes in surgery are probably outdated and may require major changes to adjust them to modern day legislation. A literature search may provide an opportunity for enhancing the quality of the surgical IC (SIC) process. Methods Relevant English literature obtained from PubMed, Picarta, PsycINFO, and Google between 1993 and 2009 was reviewed. Results The body of literature with respect to SIC is slim and of moderate quality. The SIC process is an underestimated part of surgery and neither surgeons nor patients sufficiently realize its importance. Surgeons are not specifically trained and lack the competence to guide patients through a legally correct SIC process. Computerized programs can support the SIC process significantly but are rarely used for this purpose. Conclusions IC should be integrated into our surgical practice. Unfortunately, a big gap exists between the theoretical/legal best practice and the daily practice of IC. An optimally informed patient will have more realistic expectations regarding a surgical procedure and its associated risks. Well-informed patients will be more satisfied and file fewer legal claims. The use of interactive computer-based programs provides opportunities to improve the SIC process. Informed Consent Form (dpeaa)DE-He213 Informed Consent Process (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nazi Concentration Camp (dpeaa)DE-He213 Adequate Informed Consent (dpeaa)DE-He213 Flash Movie (dpeaa)DE-He213 Keulers, Bram J. aut Scheltinga, Marc R. M. aut Spauwen, Paul H. M. aut van der Wilt, Gert-Jan aut Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 1996 34(2010), 7 vom: 07. Apr., Seite 1406-1415 (DE-627)SPR003391159 nnns volume:34 year:2010 number:7 day:07 month:04 pages:1406-1415 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 34 2010 7 07 04 1406-1415 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0 doi (DE-627)SPR003428842 (SPR)s00268-010-0542-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Leclercq, Wouter K. G. verfasserin aut A Review of Surgical Informed Consent: Past, Present, and Future. A Quest to Help Patients Make Better Decisions 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2010 Background Informed consent (IC) is a process requiring a competent doctor, adequate transfer of information, and consent of the patient. It is not just a signature on a piece of paper. Current consent processes in surgery are probably outdated and may require major changes to adjust them to modern day legislation. A literature search may provide an opportunity for enhancing the quality of the surgical IC (SIC) process. Methods Relevant English literature obtained from PubMed, Picarta, PsycINFO, and Google between 1993 and 2009 was reviewed. Results The body of literature with respect to SIC is slim and of moderate quality. The SIC process is an underestimated part of surgery and neither surgeons nor patients sufficiently realize its importance. Surgeons are not specifically trained and lack the competence to guide patients through a legally correct SIC process. Computerized programs can support the SIC process significantly but are rarely used for this purpose. Conclusions IC should be integrated into our surgical practice. Unfortunately, a big gap exists between the theoretical/legal best practice and the daily practice of IC. An optimally informed patient will have more realistic expectations regarding a surgical procedure and its associated risks. Well-informed patients will be more satisfied and file fewer legal claims. The use of interactive computer-based programs provides opportunities to improve the SIC process. Informed Consent Form (dpeaa)DE-He213 Informed Consent Process (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nazi Concentration Camp (dpeaa)DE-He213 Adequate Informed Consent (dpeaa)DE-He213 Flash Movie (dpeaa)DE-He213 Keulers, Bram J. aut Scheltinga, Marc R. M. aut Spauwen, Paul H. M. aut van der Wilt, Gert-Jan aut Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 1996 34(2010), 7 vom: 07. Apr., Seite 1406-1415 (DE-627)SPR003391159 nnns volume:34 year:2010 number:7 day:07 month:04 pages:1406-1415 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 34 2010 7 07 04 1406-1415 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0 doi (DE-627)SPR003428842 (SPR)s00268-010-0542-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Leclercq, Wouter K. G. verfasserin aut A Review of Surgical Informed Consent: Past, Present, and Future. A Quest to Help Patients Make Better Decisions 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2010 Background Informed consent (IC) is a process requiring a competent doctor, adequate transfer of information, and consent of the patient. It is not just a signature on a piece of paper. Current consent processes in surgery are probably outdated and may require major changes to adjust them to modern day legislation. A literature search may provide an opportunity for enhancing the quality of the surgical IC (SIC) process. Methods Relevant English literature obtained from PubMed, Picarta, PsycINFO, and Google between 1993 and 2009 was reviewed. Results The body of literature with respect to SIC is slim and of moderate quality. The SIC process is an underestimated part of surgery and neither surgeons nor patients sufficiently realize its importance. Surgeons are not specifically trained and lack the competence to guide patients through a legally correct SIC process. Computerized programs can support the SIC process significantly but are rarely used for this purpose. Conclusions IC should be integrated into our surgical practice. Unfortunately, a big gap exists between the theoretical/legal best practice and the daily practice of IC. An optimally informed patient will have more realistic expectations regarding a surgical procedure and its associated risks. Well-informed patients will be more satisfied and file fewer legal claims. The use of interactive computer-based programs provides opportunities to improve the SIC process. Informed Consent Form (dpeaa)DE-He213 Informed Consent Process (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nazi Concentration Camp (dpeaa)DE-He213 Adequate Informed Consent (dpeaa)DE-He213 Flash Movie (dpeaa)DE-He213 Keulers, Bram J. aut Scheltinga, Marc R. M. aut Spauwen, Paul H. M. aut van der Wilt, Gert-Jan aut Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 1996 34(2010), 7 vom: 07. Apr., Seite 1406-1415 (DE-627)SPR003391159 nnns volume:34 year:2010 number:7 day:07 month:04 pages:1406-1415 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 34 2010 7 07 04 1406-1415 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0 doi (DE-627)SPR003428842 (SPR)s00268-010-0542-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Leclercq, Wouter K. G. verfasserin aut A Review of Surgical Informed Consent: Past, Present, and Future. A Quest to Help Patients Make Better Decisions 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2010 Background Informed consent (IC) is a process requiring a competent doctor, adequate transfer of information, and consent of the patient. It is not just a signature on a piece of paper. Current consent processes in surgery are probably outdated and may require major changes to adjust them to modern day legislation. A literature search may provide an opportunity for enhancing the quality of the surgical IC (SIC) process. Methods Relevant English literature obtained from PubMed, Picarta, PsycINFO, and Google between 1993 and 2009 was reviewed. Results The body of literature with respect to SIC is slim and of moderate quality. The SIC process is an underestimated part of surgery and neither surgeons nor patients sufficiently realize its importance. Surgeons are not specifically trained and lack the competence to guide patients through a legally correct SIC process. Computerized programs can support the SIC process significantly but are rarely used for this purpose. Conclusions IC should be integrated into our surgical practice. Unfortunately, a big gap exists between the theoretical/legal best practice and the daily practice of IC. An optimally informed patient will have more realistic expectations regarding a surgical procedure and its associated risks. Well-informed patients will be more satisfied and file fewer legal claims. The use of interactive computer-based programs provides opportunities to improve the SIC process. Informed Consent Form (dpeaa)DE-He213 Informed Consent Process (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nazi Concentration Camp (dpeaa)DE-He213 Adequate Informed Consent (dpeaa)DE-He213 Flash Movie (dpeaa)DE-He213 Keulers, Bram J. aut Scheltinga, Marc R. M. aut Spauwen, Paul H. M. aut van der Wilt, Gert-Jan aut Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 1996 34(2010), 7 vom: 07. Apr., Seite 1406-1415 (DE-627)SPR003391159 nnns volume:34 year:2010 number:7 day:07 month:04 pages:1406-1415 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 34 2010 7 07 04 1406-1415 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery 34(2010), 7 vom: 07. Apr., Seite 1406-1415 volume:34 year:2010 number:7 day:07 month:04 pages:1406-1415 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery 34(2010), 7 vom: 07. Apr., Seite 1406-1415 volume:34 year:2010 number:7 day:07 month:04 pages:1406-1415 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Informed Consent Form Informed Consent Process Nazi Concentration Camp Adequate Informed Consent Flash Movie |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
World Journal of Surgery |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Leclercq, Wouter K. G. @@aut@@ Keulers, Bram J. @@aut@@ Scheltinga, Marc R. M. @@aut@@ Spauwen, Paul H. M. @@aut@@ van der Wilt, Gert-Jan @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2010-04-07T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR003391159 |
| id |
SPR003428842 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR003428842</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328140034.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201001s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR003428842</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00268-010-0542-0-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Leclercq, Wouter K. G.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A Review of Surgical Informed Consent: Past, Present, and Future. A Quest to Help Patients Make Better Decisions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Informed consent (IC) is a process requiring a competent doctor, adequate transfer of information, and consent of the patient. It is not just a signature on a piece of paper. Current consent processes in surgery are probably outdated and may require major changes to adjust them to modern day legislation. A literature search may provide an opportunity for enhancing the quality of the surgical IC (SIC) process. Methods Relevant English literature obtained from PubMed, Picarta, PsycINFO, and Google between 1993 and 2009 was reviewed. Results The body of literature with respect to SIC is slim and of moderate quality. The SIC process is an underestimated part of surgery and neither surgeons nor patients sufficiently realize its importance. Surgeons are not specifically trained and lack the competence to guide patients through a legally correct SIC process. Computerized programs can support the SIC process significantly but are rarely used for this purpose. Conclusions IC should be integrated into our surgical practice. Unfortunately, a big gap exists between the theoretical/legal best practice and the daily practice of IC. An optimally informed patient will have more realistic expectations regarding a surgical procedure and its associated risks. Well-informed patients will be more satisfied and file fewer legal claims. The use of interactive computer-based programs provides opportunities to improve the SIC process.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Informed Consent Form</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Informed Consent Process</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nazi Concentration Camp</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Adequate Informed Consent</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Flash Movie</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Keulers, Bram J.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Scheltinga, Marc R. M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Spauwen, Paul H. M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">van der Wilt, Gert-Jan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">World Journal of Surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">34(2010), 7 vom: 07. Apr., Seite 1406-1415</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR003391159</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:34</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">day:07</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1406-1415</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">34</subfield><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="b">07</subfield><subfield code="c">04</subfield><subfield code="h">1406-1415</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Leclercq, Wouter K. G. |
| spellingShingle |
Leclercq, Wouter K. G. misc Informed Consent Form misc Informed Consent Process misc Nazi Concentration Camp misc Adequate Informed Consent misc Flash Movie A Review of Surgical Informed Consent: Past, Present, and Future. A Quest to Help Patients Make Better Decisions |
| authorStr |
Leclercq, Wouter K. G. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR003391159 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
A Review of Surgical Informed Consent: Past, Present, and Future. A Quest to Help Patients Make Better Decisions Informed Consent Form (dpeaa)DE-He213 Informed Consent Process (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nazi Concentration Camp (dpeaa)DE-He213 Adequate Informed Consent (dpeaa)DE-He213 Flash Movie (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Informed Consent Form misc Informed Consent Process misc Nazi Concentration Camp misc Adequate Informed Consent misc Flash Movie |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Informed Consent Form misc Informed Consent Process misc Nazi Concentration Camp misc Adequate Informed Consent misc Flash Movie |
| topic_browse |
misc Informed Consent Form misc Informed Consent Process misc Nazi Concentration Camp misc Adequate Informed Consent misc Flash Movie |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
World Journal of Surgery |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR003391159 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
World Journal of Surgery |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR003391159 |
| title |
A Review of Surgical Informed Consent: Past, Present, and Future. A Quest to Help Patients Make Better Decisions |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR003428842 (SPR)s00268-010-0542-0-e |
| title_full |
A Review of Surgical Informed Consent: Past, Present, and Future. A Quest to Help Patients Make Better Decisions |
| author_sort |
Leclercq, Wouter K. G. |
| journal |
World Journal of Surgery |
| journalStr |
World Journal of Surgery |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2010 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1406 |
| author_browse |
Leclercq, Wouter K. G. Keulers, Bram J. Scheltinga, Marc R. M. Spauwen, Paul H. M. van der Wilt, Gert-Jan |
| container_volume |
34 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Leclercq, Wouter K. G. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0 |
| title_sort |
review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. a quest to help patients make better decisions |
| title_auth |
A Review of Surgical Informed Consent: Past, Present, and Future. A Quest to Help Patients Make Better Decisions |
| abstract |
Background Informed consent (IC) is a process requiring a competent doctor, adequate transfer of information, and consent of the patient. It is not just a signature on a piece of paper. Current consent processes in surgery are probably outdated and may require major changes to adjust them to modern day legislation. A literature search may provide an opportunity for enhancing the quality of the surgical IC (SIC) process. Methods Relevant English literature obtained from PubMed, Picarta, PsycINFO, and Google between 1993 and 2009 was reviewed. Results The body of literature with respect to SIC is slim and of moderate quality. The SIC process is an underestimated part of surgery and neither surgeons nor patients sufficiently realize its importance. Surgeons are not specifically trained and lack the competence to guide patients through a legally correct SIC process. Computerized programs can support the SIC process significantly but are rarely used for this purpose. Conclusions IC should be integrated into our surgical practice. Unfortunately, a big gap exists between the theoretical/legal best practice and the daily practice of IC. An optimally informed patient will have more realistic expectations regarding a surgical procedure and its associated risks. Well-informed patients will be more satisfied and file fewer legal claims. The use of interactive computer-based programs provides opportunities to improve the SIC process. © The Author(s) 2010 |
| abstractGer |
Background Informed consent (IC) is a process requiring a competent doctor, adequate transfer of information, and consent of the patient. It is not just a signature on a piece of paper. Current consent processes in surgery are probably outdated and may require major changes to adjust them to modern day legislation. A literature search may provide an opportunity for enhancing the quality of the surgical IC (SIC) process. Methods Relevant English literature obtained from PubMed, Picarta, PsycINFO, and Google between 1993 and 2009 was reviewed. Results The body of literature with respect to SIC is slim and of moderate quality. The SIC process is an underestimated part of surgery and neither surgeons nor patients sufficiently realize its importance. Surgeons are not specifically trained and lack the competence to guide patients through a legally correct SIC process. Computerized programs can support the SIC process significantly but are rarely used for this purpose. Conclusions IC should be integrated into our surgical practice. Unfortunately, a big gap exists between the theoretical/legal best practice and the daily practice of IC. An optimally informed patient will have more realistic expectations regarding a surgical procedure and its associated risks. Well-informed patients will be more satisfied and file fewer legal claims. The use of interactive computer-based programs provides opportunities to improve the SIC process. © The Author(s) 2010 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Background Informed consent (IC) is a process requiring a competent doctor, adequate transfer of information, and consent of the patient. It is not just a signature on a piece of paper. Current consent processes in surgery are probably outdated and may require major changes to adjust them to modern day legislation. A literature search may provide an opportunity for enhancing the quality of the surgical IC (SIC) process. Methods Relevant English literature obtained from PubMed, Picarta, PsycINFO, and Google between 1993 and 2009 was reviewed. Results The body of literature with respect to SIC is slim and of moderate quality. The SIC process is an underestimated part of surgery and neither surgeons nor patients sufficiently realize its importance. Surgeons are not specifically trained and lack the competence to guide patients through a legally correct SIC process. Computerized programs can support the SIC process significantly but are rarely used for this purpose. Conclusions IC should be integrated into our surgical practice. Unfortunately, a big gap exists between the theoretical/legal best practice and the daily practice of IC. An optimally informed patient will have more realistic expectations regarding a surgical procedure and its associated risks. Well-informed patients will be more satisfied and file fewer legal claims. The use of interactive computer-based programs provides opportunities to improve the SIC process. © The Author(s) 2010 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
7 |
| title_short |
A Review of Surgical Informed Consent: Past, Present, and Future. A Quest to Help Patients Make Better Decisions |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Keulers, Bram J. Scheltinga, Marc R. M. Spauwen, Paul H. M. van der Wilt, Gert-Jan |
| author2Str |
Keulers, Bram J. Scheltinga, Marc R. M. Spauwen, Paul H. M. van der Wilt, Gert-Jan |
| ppnlink |
SPR003391159 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T19:26:55.730Z |
| _version_ |
1803587226945191936 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR003428842</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328140034.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201001s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR003428842</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00268-010-0542-0-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Leclercq, Wouter K. G.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A Review of Surgical Informed Consent: Past, Present, and Future. A Quest to Help Patients Make Better Decisions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Informed consent (IC) is a process requiring a competent doctor, adequate transfer of information, and consent of the patient. It is not just a signature on a piece of paper. Current consent processes in surgery are probably outdated and may require major changes to adjust them to modern day legislation. A literature search may provide an opportunity for enhancing the quality of the surgical IC (SIC) process. Methods Relevant English literature obtained from PubMed, Picarta, PsycINFO, and Google between 1993 and 2009 was reviewed. Results The body of literature with respect to SIC is slim and of moderate quality. The SIC process is an underestimated part of surgery and neither surgeons nor patients sufficiently realize its importance. Surgeons are not specifically trained and lack the competence to guide patients through a legally correct SIC process. Computerized programs can support the SIC process significantly but are rarely used for this purpose. Conclusions IC should be integrated into our surgical practice. Unfortunately, a big gap exists between the theoretical/legal best practice and the daily practice of IC. An optimally informed patient will have more realistic expectations regarding a surgical procedure and its associated risks. Well-informed patients will be more satisfied and file fewer legal claims. The use of interactive computer-based programs provides opportunities to improve the SIC process.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Informed Consent Form</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Informed Consent Process</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nazi Concentration Camp</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Adequate Informed Consent</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Flash Movie</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Keulers, Bram J.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Scheltinga, Marc R. M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Spauwen, Paul H. M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">van der Wilt, Gert-Jan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">World Journal of Surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">34(2010), 7 vom: 07. Apr., Seite 1406-1415</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR003391159</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:34</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">day:07</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1406-1415</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">34</subfield><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="b">07</subfield><subfield code="c">04</subfield><subfield code="h">1406-1415</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399828 |