Evaluation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score for Patients with Acute Appendicitis
Background Acute appendicitis is still a difficult diagnosis. Scoring systems are designed to aid in the clinical assessment of patients with acute appendicitis. The Alvarado score is the most well known and best performing in validation studies. The purpose of the present study was to externally va...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
de Castro, S. M. M. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2012 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2012 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: World Journal of Surgery - Springer-Verlag, 1996, 36(2012), 7 vom: 24. März, Seite 1540-1545 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:36 ; year:2012 ; number:7 ; day:24 ; month:03 ; pages:1540-1545 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR003438481 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR003438481 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230328140100.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201001s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR003438481 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s00268-012-1521-4-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a de Castro, S. M. M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score for Patients with Acute Appendicitis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s) 2012 | ||
| 520 | |a Background Acute appendicitis is still a difficult diagnosis. Scoring systems are designed to aid in the clinical assessment of patients with acute appendicitis. The Alvarado score is the most well known and best performing in validation studies. The purpose of the present study was to externally validate a recently developed appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score and compare it to the Alvarado score. Methods The present study selected consecutive patients who presented with suspicion of acute appendicitis between 2006 and 2009. Variables necessary to evaluate the scoring systems were registered. The diagnostic performance of the two scores was compared. Results The present study included 941 consecutive patients with suspicion of acute appendicitis. There were 410 male patients (44%) and 531 female patients (56%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the AIR score was 0.96 and significantly better than the area under the curve of 0.82 of the Alvarado score (p < 0.05). The AIR score also outperformed the Alvarado score when analyzing the more difficult patients, including women, children, and the elderly. Conclusions This study externally validates the AIR Score for patients with acute appendicitis. The scoring system has a high discriminating power and outperforms the Alvarado score. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Appendicitis |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Acute Appendicitis |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Laparoscopic Appendectomy |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Diagnostic Laparoscopy |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Present Cohort |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ünlü, Ç. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Steller, E. Ph. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a van Wagensveld, B. A. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vrouenraets, B. C. |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t World Journal of Surgery |d Springer-Verlag, 1996 |g 36(2012), 7 vom: 24. März, Seite 1540-1545 |w (DE-627)SPR003391159 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:36 |g year:2012 |g number:7 |g day:24 |g month:03 |g pages:1540-1545 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 36 |j 2012 |e 7 |b 24 |c 03 |h 1540-1545 | ||
| author_variant |
c s m m d csmm csmmd ç ü çü e p s ep eps w b a v wba wbav b c v bc bcv |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
decastrosmmnlstellerephvanwagensveldbavr:2012----:vlainfhapniiiifamtrrsossoeoptet |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2012 |
| publishDate |
2012 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4 doi (DE-627)SPR003438481 (SPR)s00268-012-1521-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng de Castro, S. M. M. verfasserin aut Evaluation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score for Patients with Acute Appendicitis 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2012 Background Acute appendicitis is still a difficult diagnosis. Scoring systems are designed to aid in the clinical assessment of patients with acute appendicitis. The Alvarado score is the most well known and best performing in validation studies. The purpose of the present study was to externally validate a recently developed appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score and compare it to the Alvarado score. Methods The present study selected consecutive patients who presented with suspicion of acute appendicitis between 2006 and 2009. Variables necessary to evaluate the scoring systems were registered. The diagnostic performance of the two scores was compared. Results The present study included 941 consecutive patients with suspicion of acute appendicitis. There were 410 male patients (44%) and 531 female patients (56%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the AIR score was 0.96 and significantly better than the area under the curve of 0.82 of the Alvarado score (p < 0.05). The AIR score also outperformed the Alvarado score when analyzing the more difficult patients, including women, children, and the elderly. Conclusions This study externally validates the AIR Score for patients with acute appendicitis. The scoring system has a high discriminating power and outperforms the Alvarado score. Appendicitis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acute Appendicitis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Laparoscopic Appendectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Diagnostic Laparoscopy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Present Cohort (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ünlü, Ç. aut Steller, E. Ph. aut van Wagensveld, B. A. aut Vrouenraets, B. C. aut Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 1996 36(2012), 7 vom: 24. März, Seite 1540-1545 (DE-627)SPR003391159 nnns volume:36 year:2012 number:7 day:24 month:03 pages:1540-1545 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 36 2012 7 24 03 1540-1545 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4 doi (DE-627)SPR003438481 (SPR)s00268-012-1521-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng de Castro, S. M. M. verfasserin aut Evaluation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score for Patients with Acute Appendicitis 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2012 Background Acute appendicitis is still a difficult diagnosis. Scoring systems are designed to aid in the clinical assessment of patients with acute appendicitis. The Alvarado score is the most well known and best performing in validation studies. The purpose of the present study was to externally validate a recently developed appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score and compare it to the Alvarado score. Methods The present study selected consecutive patients who presented with suspicion of acute appendicitis between 2006 and 2009. Variables necessary to evaluate the scoring systems were registered. The diagnostic performance of the two scores was compared. Results The present study included 941 consecutive patients with suspicion of acute appendicitis. There were 410 male patients (44%) and 531 female patients (56%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the AIR score was 0.96 and significantly better than the area under the curve of 0.82 of the Alvarado score (p < 0.05). The AIR score also outperformed the Alvarado score when analyzing the more difficult patients, including women, children, and the elderly. Conclusions This study externally validates the AIR Score for patients with acute appendicitis. The scoring system has a high discriminating power and outperforms the Alvarado score. Appendicitis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acute Appendicitis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Laparoscopic Appendectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Diagnostic Laparoscopy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Present Cohort (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ünlü, Ç. aut Steller, E. Ph. aut van Wagensveld, B. A. aut Vrouenraets, B. C. aut Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 1996 36(2012), 7 vom: 24. März, Seite 1540-1545 (DE-627)SPR003391159 nnns volume:36 year:2012 number:7 day:24 month:03 pages:1540-1545 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 36 2012 7 24 03 1540-1545 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4 doi (DE-627)SPR003438481 (SPR)s00268-012-1521-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng de Castro, S. M. M. verfasserin aut Evaluation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score for Patients with Acute Appendicitis 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2012 Background Acute appendicitis is still a difficult diagnosis. Scoring systems are designed to aid in the clinical assessment of patients with acute appendicitis. The Alvarado score is the most well known and best performing in validation studies. The purpose of the present study was to externally validate a recently developed appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score and compare it to the Alvarado score. Methods The present study selected consecutive patients who presented with suspicion of acute appendicitis between 2006 and 2009. Variables necessary to evaluate the scoring systems were registered. The diagnostic performance of the two scores was compared. Results The present study included 941 consecutive patients with suspicion of acute appendicitis. There were 410 male patients (44%) and 531 female patients (56%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the AIR score was 0.96 and significantly better than the area under the curve of 0.82 of the Alvarado score (p < 0.05). The AIR score also outperformed the Alvarado score when analyzing the more difficult patients, including women, children, and the elderly. Conclusions This study externally validates the AIR Score for patients with acute appendicitis. The scoring system has a high discriminating power and outperforms the Alvarado score. Appendicitis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acute Appendicitis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Laparoscopic Appendectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Diagnostic Laparoscopy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Present Cohort (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ünlü, Ç. aut Steller, E. Ph. aut van Wagensveld, B. A. aut Vrouenraets, B. C. aut Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 1996 36(2012), 7 vom: 24. März, Seite 1540-1545 (DE-627)SPR003391159 nnns volume:36 year:2012 number:7 day:24 month:03 pages:1540-1545 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 36 2012 7 24 03 1540-1545 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4 doi (DE-627)SPR003438481 (SPR)s00268-012-1521-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng de Castro, S. M. M. verfasserin aut Evaluation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score for Patients with Acute Appendicitis 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2012 Background Acute appendicitis is still a difficult diagnosis. Scoring systems are designed to aid in the clinical assessment of patients with acute appendicitis. The Alvarado score is the most well known and best performing in validation studies. The purpose of the present study was to externally validate a recently developed appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score and compare it to the Alvarado score. Methods The present study selected consecutive patients who presented with suspicion of acute appendicitis between 2006 and 2009. Variables necessary to evaluate the scoring systems were registered. The diagnostic performance of the two scores was compared. Results The present study included 941 consecutive patients with suspicion of acute appendicitis. There were 410 male patients (44%) and 531 female patients (56%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the AIR score was 0.96 and significantly better than the area under the curve of 0.82 of the Alvarado score (p < 0.05). The AIR score also outperformed the Alvarado score when analyzing the more difficult patients, including women, children, and the elderly. Conclusions This study externally validates the AIR Score for patients with acute appendicitis. The scoring system has a high discriminating power and outperforms the Alvarado score. Appendicitis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acute Appendicitis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Laparoscopic Appendectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Diagnostic Laparoscopy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Present Cohort (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ünlü, Ç. aut Steller, E. Ph. aut van Wagensveld, B. A. aut Vrouenraets, B. C. aut Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 1996 36(2012), 7 vom: 24. März, Seite 1540-1545 (DE-627)SPR003391159 nnns volume:36 year:2012 number:7 day:24 month:03 pages:1540-1545 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 36 2012 7 24 03 1540-1545 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4 doi (DE-627)SPR003438481 (SPR)s00268-012-1521-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng de Castro, S. M. M. verfasserin aut Evaluation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score for Patients with Acute Appendicitis 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2012 Background Acute appendicitis is still a difficult diagnosis. Scoring systems are designed to aid in the clinical assessment of patients with acute appendicitis. The Alvarado score is the most well known and best performing in validation studies. The purpose of the present study was to externally validate a recently developed appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score and compare it to the Alvarado score. Methods The present study selected consecutive patients who presented with suspicion of acute appendicitis between 2006 and 2009. Variables necessary to evaluate the scoring systems were registered. The diagnostic performance of the two scores was compared. Results The present study included 941 consecutive patients with suspicion of acute appendicitis. There were 410 male patients (44%) and 531 female patients (56%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the AIR score was 0.96 and significantly better than the area under the curve of 0.82 of the Alvarado score (p < 0.05). The AIR score also outperformed the Alvarado score when analyzing the more difficult patients, including women, children, and the elderly. Conclusions This study externally validates the AIR Score for patients with acute appendicitis. The scoring system has a high discriminating power and outperforms the Alvarado score. Appendicitis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acute Appendicitis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Laparoscopic Appendectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Diagnostic Laparoscopy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Present Cohort (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ünlü, Ç. aut Steller, E. Ph. aut van Wagensveld, B. A. aut Vrouenraets, B. C. aut Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 1996 36(2012), 7 vom: 24. März, Seite 1540-1545 (DE-627)SPR003391159 nnns volume:36 year:2012 number:7 day:24 month:03 pages:1540-1545 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 36 2012 7 24 03 1540-1545 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery 36(2012), 7 vom: 24. März, Seite 1540-1545 volume:36 year:2012 number:7 day:24 month:03 pages:1540-1545 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery 36(2012), 7 vom: 24. März, Seite 1540-1545 volume:36 year:2012 number:7 day:24 month:03 pages:1540-1545 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Appendicitis Acute Appendicitis Laparoscopic Appendectomy Diagnostic Laparoscopy Present Cohort |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
World Journal of Surgery |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
de Castro, S. M. M. @@aut@@ Ünlü, Ç. @@aut@@ Steller, E. Ph. @@aut@@ van Wagensveld, B. A. @@aut@@ Vrouenraets, B. C. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2012-03-24T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR003391159 |
| id |
SPR003438481 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR003438481</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328140100.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201001s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR003438481</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00268-012-1521-4-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Castro, S. M. M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score for Patients with Acute Appendicitis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Acute appendicitis is still a difficult diagnosis. Scoring systems are designed to aid in the clinical assessment of patients with acute appendicitis. The Alvarado score is the most well known and best performing in validation studies. The purpose of the present study was to externally validate a recently developed appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score and compare it to the Alvarado score. Methods The present study selected consecutive patients who presented with suspicion of acute appendicitis between 2006 and 2009. Variables necessary to evaluate the scoring systems were registered. The diagnostic performance of the two scores was compared. Results The present study included 941 consecutive patients with suspicion of acute appendicitis. There were 410 male patients (44%) and 531 female patients (56%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the AIR score was 0.96 and significantly better than the area under the curve of 0.82 of the Alvarado score (p < 0.05). The AIR score also outperformed the Alvarado score when analyzing the more difficult patients, including women, children, and the elderly. Conclusions This study externally validates the AIR Score for patients with acute appendicitis. The scoring system has a high discriminating power and outperforms the Alvarado score.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Appendicitis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Acute Appendicitis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Laparoscopic Appendectomy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Diagnostic Laparoscopy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Present Cohort</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ünlü, Ç.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Steller, E. Ph.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">van Wagensveld, B. A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vrouenraets, B. C.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">World Journal of Surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">36(2012), 7 vom: 24. März, Seite 1540-1545</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR003391159</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:36</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">day:24</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1540-1545</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">36</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="b">24</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">1540-1545</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
de Castro, S. M. M. |
| spellingShingle |
de Castro, S. M. M. misc Appendicitis misc Acute Appendicitis misc Laparoscopic Appendectomy misc Diagnostic Laparoscopy misc Present Cohort Evaluation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score for Patients with Acute Appendicitis |
| authorStr |
de Castro, S. M. M. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR003391159 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Evaluation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score for Patients with Acute Appendicitis Appendicitis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acute Appendicitis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Laparoscopic Appendectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Diagnostic Laparoscopy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Present Cohort (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Appendicitis misc Acute Appendicitis misc Laparoscopic Appendectomy misc Diagnostic Laparoscopy misc Present Cohort |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Appendicitis misc Acute Appendicitis misc Laparoscopic Appendectomy misc Diagnostic Laparoscopy misc Present Cohort |
| topic_browse |
misc Appendicitis misc Acute Appendicitis misc Laparoscopic Appendectomy misc Diagnostic Laparoscopy misc Present Cohort |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
World Journal of Surgery |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR003391159 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
World Journal of Surgery |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR003391159 |
| title |
Evaluation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score for Patients with Acute Appendicitis |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR003438481 (SPR)s00268-012-1521-4-e |
| title_full |
Evaluation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score for Patients with Acute Appendicitis |
| author_sort |
de Castro, S. M. M. |
| journal |
World Journal of Surgery |
| journalStr |
World Journal of Surgery |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2012 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1540 |
| author_browse |
de Castro, S. M. M. Ünlü, Ç. Steller, E. Ph. van Wagensveld, B. A. Vrouenraets, B. C. |
| container_volume |
36 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
de Castro, S. M. M. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4 |
| title_sort |
evaluation of the appendicitis inflammatory response score for patients with acute appendicitis |
| title_auth |
Evaluation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score for Patients with Acute Appendicitis |
| abstract |
Background Acute appendicitis is still a difficult diagnosis. Scoring systems are designed to aid in the clinical assessment of patients with acute appendicitis. The Alvarado score is the most well known and best performing in validation studies. The purpose of the present study was to externally validate a recently developed appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score and compare it to the Alvarado score. Methods The present study selected consecutive patients who presented with suspicion of acute appendicitis between 2006 and 2009. Variables necessary to evaluate the scoring systems were registered. The diagnostic performance of the two scores was compared. Results The present study included 941 consecutive patients with suspicion of acute appendicitis. There were 410 male patients (44%) and 531 female patients (56%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the AIR score was 0.96 and significantly better than the area under the curve of 0.82 of the Alvarado score (p < 0.05). The AIR score also outperformed the Alvarado score when analyzing the more difficult patients, including women, children, and the elderly. Conclusions This study externally validates the AIR Score for patients with acute appendicitis. The scoring system has a high discriminating power and outperforms the Alvarado score. © The Author(s) 2012 |
| abstractGer |
Background Acute appendicitis is still a difficult diagnosis. Scoring systems are designed to aid in the clinical assessment of patients with acute appendicitis. The Alvarado score is the most well known and best performing in validation studies. The purpose of the present study was to externally validate a recently developed appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score and compare it to the Alvarado score. Methods The present study selected consecutive patients who presented with suspicion of acute appendicitis between 2006 and 2009. Variables necessary to evaluate the scoring systems were registered. The diagnostic performance of the two scores was compared. Results The present study included 941 consecutive patients with suspicion of acute appendicitis. There were 410 male patients (44%) and 531 female patients (56%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the AIR score was 0.96 and significantly better than the area under the curve of 0.82 of the Alvarado score (p < 0.05). The AIR score also outperformed the Alvarado score when analyzing the more difficult patients, including women, children, and the elderly. Conclusions This study externally validates the AIR Score for patients with acute appendicitis. The scoring system has a high discriminating power and outperforms the Alvarado score. © The Author(s) 2012 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Background Acute appendicitis is still a difficult diagnosis. Scoring systems are designed to aid in the clinical assessment of patients with acute appendicitis. The Alvarado score is the most well known and best performing in validation studies. The purpose of the present study was to externally validate a recently developed appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score and compare it to the Alvarado score. Methods The present study selected consecutive patients who presented with suspicion of acute appendicitis between 2006 and 2009. Variables necessary to evaluate the scoring systems were registered. The diagnostic performance of the two scores was compared. Results The present study included 941 consecutive patients with suspicion of acute appendicitis. There were 410 male patients (44%) and 531 female patients (56%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the AIR score was 0.96 and significantly better than the area under the curve of 0.82 of the Alvarado score (p < 0.05). The AIR score also outperformed the Alvarado score when analyzing the more difficult patients, including women, children, and the elderly. Conclusions This study externally validates the AIR Score for patients with acute appendicitis. The scoring system has a high discriminating power and outperforms the Alvarado score. © The Author(s) 2012 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
7 |
| title_short |
Evaluation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score for Patients with Acute Appendicitis |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Ünlü, Ç. Steller, E. Ph van Wagensveld, B. A. Vrouenraets, B. C. |
| author2Str |
Ünlü, Ç. Steller, E. Ph van Wagensveld, B. A. Vrouenraets, B. C. |
| ppnlink |
SPR003391159 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T19:29:37.249Z |
| _version_ |
1803587396305944576 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR003438481</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328140100.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201001s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR003438481</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00268-012-1521-4-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Castro, S. M. M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score for Patients with Acute Appendicitis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Acute appendicitis is still a difficult diagnosis. Scoring systems are designed to aid in the clinical assessment of patients with acute appendicitis. The Alvarado score is the most well known and best performing in validation studies. The purpose of the present study was to externally validate a recently developed appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score and compare it to the Alvarado score. Methods The present study selected consecutive patients who presented with suspicion of acute appendicitis between 2006 and 2009. Variables necessary to evaluate the scoring systems were registered. The diagnostic performance of the two scores was compared. Results The present study included 941 consecutive patients with suspicion of acute appendicitis. There were 410 male patients (44%) and 531 female patients (56%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the AIR score was 0.96 and significantly better than the area under the curve of 0.82 of the Alvarado score (p < 0.05). The AIR score also outperformed the Alvarado score when analyzing the more difficult patients, including women, children, and the elderly. Conclusions This study externally validates the AIR Score for patients with acute appendicitis. The scoring system has a high discriminating power and outperforms the Alvarado score.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Appendicitis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Acute Appendicitis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Laparoscopic Appendectomy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Diagnostic Laparoscopy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Present Cohort</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ünlü, Ç.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Steller, E. Ph.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">van Wagensveld, B. A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vrouenraets, B. C.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">World Journal of Surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">36(2012), 7 vom: 24. März, Seite 1540-1545</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR003391159</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:36</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">day:24</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1540-1545</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">36</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="b">24</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">1540-1545</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4001036 |