The Impact of Resident- and Self-Evaluations on Surgeon’s Subsequent Teaching Performance
Background This study evaluates how residents’ evaluations and self-evaluations of surgeon’s teaching performance evolve after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Furthermore, the influence of over- and underestimating own performance on subsequent teaching performance was investigate...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Boerebach, Benjamin C. M. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2014 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: World Journal of Surgery - Springer-Verlag, 1996, 38(2014), 11 vom: 28. Mai, Seite 2761-2769 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:38 ; year:2014 ; number:11 ; day:28 ; month:05 ; pages:2761-2769 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s00268-014-2655-3 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR003445151 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR003445151 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230328140121.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201001s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00268-014-2655-3 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR003445151 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s00268-014-2655-3-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Boerebach, Benjamin C. M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Impact of Resident- and Self-Evaluations on Surgeon’s Subsequent Teaching Performance |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014 | ||
| 520 | |a Background This study evaluates how residents’ evaluations and self-evaluations of surgeon’s teaching performance evolve after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Furthermore, the influence of over- and underestimating own performance on subsequent teaching performance was investigated. Methods In a multicenter cohort study, 351 surgeons evaluated themselves and were also evaluated by residents during annual evaluation periods for three subsequent years. At the end of each evaluation period, surgeons received a personal report summarizing the residents’ feedback. Changes in each surgeon’s teaching performance evaluated on a five-point scale were studied using growth models. The effect of surgeons over- or underestimating their own performance on the improvement of teaching performance was studied using adjusted multivariable regressions. Results Compared with the first (median score: 3.83, 20th to 80th percentile score: 3.46–4.16) and second (median: 3.82, 20th to 80th: 3.46–4.14) evaluation period, residents evaluated surgeon’s teaching performance higher during the third evaluation period (median: 3.91, 20th to 80th: 3.59–4.27), p < 0.001. Surgeons did not alter self-evaluation scores over the three periods. Surgeons who overestimated their teaching performance received lower subsequent performance scores by residents (regression coefficient b: −0.08, 95 % confidence limits (CL): −0.18, 0.02) and self (b: −0.12, 95 % CL: −0.21, −0.02). Surgeons who underestimated their performance subsequently scored themselves higher (b: 0.10, 95 % CL: 0.03, 0.16), but were evaluated equally by residents. Conclusions Residents’ evaluation of surgeon’s teaching performance was enhanced after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Overestimating own teaching performance could impede subsequent performance. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Evaluation Period |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Subsequent Performance |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Teaching Performance |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Residency Training Program |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Resident Evaluation |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Arah, Onyebuchi A. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Heineman, Maas Jan |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Busch, Olivier R. C. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lombarts, Kiki M. J. M. H. |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t World Journal of Surgery |d Springer-Verlag, 1996 |g 38(2014), 11 vom: 28. Mai, Seite 2761-2769 |w (DE-627)SPR003391159 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:38 |g year:2014 |g number:11 |g day:28 |g month:05 |g pages:2761-2769 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2655-3 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 38 |j 2014 |e 11 |b 28 |c 05 |h 2761-2769 | ||
| author_variant |
b c m b bcm bcmb o a a oa oaa m j h mj mjh o r c b orc orcb k m j m h l kmjmh kmjmhl |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
boerebachbenjamincmarahonyebuchiaheinema:2014----:hipcorsdnadefvlainosrensbeun |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2014 |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s00268-014-2655-3 doi (DE-627)SPR003445151 (SPR)s00268-014-2655-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Boerebach, Benjamin C. M. verfasserin aut The Impact of Resident- and Self-Evaluations on Surgeon’s Subsequent Teaching Performance 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014 Background This study evaluates how residents’ evaluations and self-evaluations of surgeon’s teaching performance evolve after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Furthermore, the influence of over- and underestimating own performance on subsequent teaching performance was investigated. Methods In a multicenter cohort study, 351 surgeons evaluated themselves and were also evaluated by residents during annual evaluation periods for three subsequent years. At the end of each evaluation period, surgeons received a personal report summarizing the residents’ feedback. Changes in each surgeon’s teaching performance evaluated on a five-point scale were studied using growth models. The effect of surgeons over- or underestimating their own performance on the improvement of teaching performance was studied using adjusted multivariable regressions. Results Compared with the first (median score: 3.83, 20th to 80th percentile score: 3.46–4.16) and second (median: 3.82, 20th to 80th: 3.46–4.14) evaluation period, residents evaluated surgeon’s teaching performance higher during the third evaluation period (median: 3.91, 20th to 80th: 3.59–4.27), p < 0.001. Surgeons did not alter self-evaluation scores over the three periods. Surgeons who overestimated their teaching performance received lower subsequent performance scores by residents (regression coefficient b: −0.08, 95 % confidence limits (CL): −0.18, 0.02) and self (b: −0.12, 95 % CL: −0.21, −0.02). Surgeons who underestimated their performance subsequently scored themselves higher (b: 0.10, 95 % CL: 0.03, 0.16), but were evaluated equally by residents. Conclusions Residents’ evaluation of surgeon’s teaching performance was enhanced after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Overestimating own teaching performance could impede subsequent performance. Evaluation Period (dpeaa)DE-He213 Subsequent Performance (dpeaa)DE-He213 Teaching Performance (dpeaa)DE-He213 Residency Training Program (dpeaa)DE-He213 Resident Evaluation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Arah, Onyebuchi A. aut Heineman, Maas Jan aut Busch, Olivier R. C. aut Lombarts, Kiki M. J. M. H. aut Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 1996 38(2014), 11 vom: 28. Mai, Seite 2761-2769 (DE-627)SPR003391159 nnns volume:38 year:2014 number:11 day:28 month:05 pages:2761-2769 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2655-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 38 2014 11 28 05 2761-2769 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s00268-014-2655-3 doi (DE-627)SPR003445151 (SPR)s00268-014-2655-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Boerebach, Benjamin C. M. verfasserin aut The Impact of Resident- and Self-Evaluations on Surgeon’s Subsequent Teaching Performance 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014 Background This study evaluates how residents’ evaluations and self-evaluations of surgeon’s teaching performance evolve after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Furthermore, the influence of over- and underestimating own performance on subsequent teaching performance was investigated. Methods In a multicenter cohort study, 351 surgeons evaluated themselves and were also evaluated by residents during annual evaluation periods for three subsequent years. At the end of each evaluation period, surgeons received a personal report summarizing the residents’ feedback. Changes in each surgeon’s teaching performance evaluated on a five-point scale were studied using growth models. The effect of surgeons over- or underestimating their own performance on the improvement of teaching performance was studied using adjusted multivariable regressions. Results Compared with the first (median score: 3.83, 20th to 80th percentile score: 3.46–4.16) and second (median: 3.82, 20th to 80th: 3.46–4.14) evaluation period, residents evaluated surgeon’s teaching performance higher during the third evaluation period (median: 3.91, 20th to 80th: 3.59–4.27), p < 0.001. Surgeons did not alter self-evaluation scores over the three periods. Surgeons who overestimated their teaching performance received lower subsequent performance scores by residents (regression coefficient b: −0.08, 95 % confidence limits (CL): −0.18, 0.02) and self (b: −0.12, 95 % CL: −0.21, −0.02). Surgeons who underestimated their performance subsequently scored themselves higher (b: 0.10, 95 % CL: 0.03, 0.16), but were evaluated equally by residents. Conclusions Residents’ evaluation of surgeon’s teaching performance was enhanced after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Overestimating own teaching performance could impede subsequent performance. Evaluation Period (dpeaa)DE-He213 Subsequent Performance (dpeaa)DE-He213 Teaching Performance (dpeaa)DE-He213 Residency Training Program (dpeaa)DE-He213 Resident Evaluation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Arah, Onyebuchi A. aut Heineman, Maas Jan aut Busch, Olivier R. C. aut Lombarts, Kiki M. J. M. H. aut Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 1996 38(2014), 11 vom: 28. Mai, Seite 2761-2769 (DE-627)SPR003391159 nnns volume:38 year:2014 number:11 day:28 month:05 pages:2761-2769 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2655-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 38 2014 11 28 05 2761-2769 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s00268-014-2655-3 doi (DE-627)SPR003445151 (SPR)s00268-014-2655-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Boerebach, Benjamin C. M. verfasserin aut The Impact of Resident- and Self-Evaluations on Surgeon’s Subsequent Teaching Performance 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014 Background This study evaluates how residents’ evaluations and self-evaluations of surgeon’s teaching performance evolve after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Furthermore, the influence of over- and underestimating own performance on subsequent teaching performance was investigated. Methods In a multicenter cohort study, 351 surgeons evaluated themselves and were also evaluated by residents during annual evaluation periods for three subsequent years. At the end of each evaluation period, surgeons received a personal report summarizing the residents’ feedback. Changes in each surgeon’s teaching performance evaluated on a five-point scale were studied using growth models. The effect of surgeons over- or underestimating their own performance on the improvement of teaching performance was studied using adjusted multivariable regressions. Results Compared with the first (median score: 3.83, 20th to 80th percentile score: 3.46–4.16) and second (median: 3.82, 20th to 80th: 3.46–4.14) evaluation period, residents evaluated surgeon’s teaching performance higher during the third evaluation period (median: 3.91, 20th to 80th: 3.59–4.27), p < 0.001. Surgeons did not alter self-evaluation scores over the three periods. Surgeons who overestimated their teaching performance received lower subsequent performance scores by residents (regression coefficient b: −0.08, 95 % confidence limits (CL): −0.18, 0.02) and self (b: −0.12, 95 % CL: −0.21, −0.02). Surgeons who underestimated their performance subsequently scored themselves higher (b: 0.10, 95 % CL: 0.03, 0.16), but were evaluated equally by residents. Conclusions Residents’ evaluation of surgeon’s teaching performance was enhanced after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Overestimating own teaching performance could impede subsequent performance. Evaluation Period (dpeaa)DE-He213 Subsequent Performance (dpeaa)DE-He213 Teaching Performance (dpeaa)DE-He213 Residency Training Program (dpeaa)DE-He213 Resident Evaluation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Arah, Onyebuchi A. aut Heineman, Maas Jan aut Busch, Olivier R. C. aut Lombarts, Kiki M. J. M. H. aut Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 1996 38(2014), 11 vom: 28. Mai, Seite 2761-2769 (DE-627)SPR003391159 nnns volume:38 year:2014 number:11 day:28 month:05 pages:2761-2769 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2655-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 38 2014 11 28 05 2761-2769 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s00268-014-2655-3 doi (DE-627)SPR003445151 (SPR)s00268-014-2655-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Boerebach, Benjamin C. M. verfasserin aut The Impact of Resident- and Self-Evaluations on Surgeon’s Subsequent Teaching Performance 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014 Background This study evaluates how residents’ evaluations and self-evaluations of surgeon’s teaching performance evolve after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Furthermore, the influence of over- and underestimating own performance on subsequent teaching performance was investigated. Methods In a multicenter cohort study, 351 surgeons evaluated themselves and were also evaluated by residents during annual evaluation periods for three subsequent years. At the end of each evaluation period, surgeons received a personal report summarizing the residents’ feedback. Changes in each surgeon’s teaching performance evaluated on a five-point scale were studied using growth models. The effect of surgeons over- or underestimating their own performance on the improvement of teaching performance was studied using adjusted multivariable regressions. Results Compared with the first (median score: 3.83, 20th to 80th percentile score: 3.46–4.16) and second (median: 3.82, 20th to 80th: 3.46–4.14) evaluation period, residents evaluated surgeon’s teaching performance higher during the third evaluation period (median: 3.91, 20th to 80th: 3.59–4.27), p < 0.001. Surgeons did not alter self-evaluation scores over the three periods. Surgeons who overestimated their teaching performance received lower subsequent performance scores by residents (regression coefficient b: −0.08, 95 % confidence limits (CL): −0.18, 0.02) and self (b: −0.12, 95 % CL: −0.21, −0.02). Surgeons who underestimated their performance subsequently scored themselves higher (b: 0.10, 95 % CL: 0.03, 0.16), but were evaluated equally by residents. Conclusions Residents’ evaluation of surgeon’s teaching performance was enhanced after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Overestimating own teaching performance could impede subsequent performance. Evaluation Period (dpeaa)DE-He213 Subsequent Performance (dpeaa)DE-He213 Teaching Performance (dpeaa)DE-He213 Residency Training Program (dpeaa)DE-He213 Resident Evaluation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Arah, Onyebuchi A. aut Heineman, Maas Jan aut Busch, Olivier R. C. aut Lombarts, Kiki M. J. M. H. aut Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 1996 38(2014), 11 vom: 28. Mai, Seite 2761-2769 (DE-627)SPR003391159 nnns volume:38 year:2014 number:11 day:28 month:05 pages:2761-2769 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2655-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 38 2014 11 28 05 2761-2769 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s00268-014-2655-3 doi (DE-627)SPR003445151 (SPR)s00268-014-2655-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Boerebach, Benjamin C. M. verfasserin aut The Impact of Resident- and Self-Evaluations on Surgeon’s Subsequent Teaching Performance 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014 Background This study evaluates how residents’ evaluations and self-evaluations of surgeon’s teaching performance evolve after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Furthermore, the influence of over- and underestimating own performance on subsequent teaching performance was investigated. Methods In a multicenter cohort study, 351 surgeons evaluated themselves and were also evaluated by residents during annual evaluation periods for three subsequent years. At the end of each evaluation period, surgeons received a personal report summarizing the residents’ feedback. Changes in each surgeon’s teaching performance evaluated on a five-point scale were studied using growth models. The effect of surgeons over- or underestimating their own performance on the improvement of teaching performance was studied using adjusted multivariable regressions. Results Compared with the first (median score: 3.83, 20th to 80th percentile score: 3.46–4.16) and second (median: 3.82, 20th to 80th: 3.46–4.14) evaluation period, residents evaluated surgeon’s teaching performance higher during the third evaluation period (median: 3.91, 20th to 80th: 3.59–4.27), p < 0.001. Surgeons did not alter self-evaluation scores over the three periods. Surgeons who overestimated their teaching performance received lower subsequent performance scores by residents (regression coefficient b: −0.08, 95 % confidence limits (CL): −0.18, 0.02) and self (b: −0.12, 95 % CL: −0.21, −0.02). Surgeons who underestimated their performance subsequently scored themselves higher (b: 0.10, 95 % CL: 0.03, 0.16), but were evaluated equally by residents. Conclusions Residents’ evaluation of surgeon’s teaching performance was enhanced after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Overestimating own teaching performance could impede subsequent performance. Evaluation Period (dpeaa)DE-He213 Subsequent Performance (dpeaa)DE-He213 Teaching Performance (dpeaa)DE-He213 Residency Training Program (dpeaa)DE-He213 Resident Evaluation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Arah, Onyebuchi A. aut Heineman, Maas Jan aut Busch, Olivier R. C. aut Lombarts, Kiki M. J. M. H. aut Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 1996 38(2014), 11 vom: 28. Mai, Seite 2761-2769 (DE-627)SPR003391159 nnns volume:38 year:2014 number:11 day:28 month:05 pages:2761-2769 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2655-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 38 2014 11 28 05 2761-2769 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery 38(2014), 11 vom: 28. Mai, Seite 2761-2769 volume:38 year:2014 number:11 day:28 month:05 pages:2761-2769 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in World Journal of Surgery 38(2014), 11 vom: 28. Mai, Seite 2761-2769 volume:38 year:2014 number:11 day:28 month:05 pages:2761-2769 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Evaluation Period Subsequent Performance Teaching Performance Residency Training Program Resident Evaluation |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
World Journal of Surgery |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Boerebach, Benjamin C. M. @@aut@@ Arah, Onyebuchi A. @@aut@@ Heineman, Maas Jan @@aut@@ Busch, Olivier R. C. @@aut@@ Lombarts, Kiki M. J. M. H. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2014-05-28T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR003391159 |
| id |
SPR003445151 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR003445151</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328140121.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201001s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00268-014-2655-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR003445151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00268-014-2655-3-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Boerebach, Benjamin C. M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Impact of Resident- and Self-Evaluations on Surgeon’s Subsequent Teaching Performance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background This study evaluates how residents’ evaluations and self-evaluations of surgeon’s teaching performance evolve after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Furthermore, the influence of over- and underestimating own performance on subsequent teaching performance was investigated. Methods In a multicenter cohort study, 351 surgeons evaluated themselves and were also evaluated by residents during annual evaluation periods for three subsequent years. At the end of each evaluation period, surgeons received a personal report summarizing the residents’ feedback. Changes in each surgeon’s teaching performance evaluated on a five-point scale were studied using growth models. The effect of surgeons over- or underestimating their own performance on the improvement of teaching performance was studied using adjusted multivariable regressions. Results Compared with the first (median score: 3.83, 20th to 80th percentile score: 3.46–4.16) and second (median: 3.82, 20th to 80th: 3.46–4.14) evaluation period, residents evaluated surgeon’s teaching performance higher during the third evaluation period (median: 3.91, 20th to 80th: 3.59–4.27), p < 0.001. Surgeons did not alter self-evaluation scores over the three periods. Surgeons who overestimated their teaching performance received lower subsequent performance scores by residents (regression coefficient b: −0.08, 95 % confidence limits (CL): −0.18, 0.02) and self (b: −0.12, 95 % CL: −0.21, −0.02). Surgeons who underestimated their performance subsequently scored themselves higher (b: 0.10, 95 % CL: 0.03, 0.16), but were evaluated equally by residents. Conclusions Residents’ evaluation of surgeon’s teaching performance was enhanced after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Overestimating own teaching performance could impede subsequent performance.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation Period</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Subsequent Performance</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Teaching Performance</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Residency Training Program</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Resident Evaluation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arah, Onyebuchi A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Heineman, Maas Jan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Busch, Olivier R. C.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lombarts, Kiki M. J. M. H.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">World Journal of Surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">38(2014), 11 vom: 28. Mai, Seite 2761-2769</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR003391159</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:38</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:11</subfield><subfield code="g">day:28</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2761-2769</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2655-3</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">38</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">11</subfield><subfield code="b">28</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">2761-2769</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Boerebach, Benjamin C. M. |
| spellingShingle |
Boerebach, Benjamin C. M. misc Evaluation Period misc Subsequent Performance misc Teaching Performance misc Residency Training Program misc Resident Evaluation The Impact of Resident- and Self-Evaluations on Surgeon’s Subsequent Teaching Performance |
| authorStr |
Boerebach, Benjamin C. M. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR003391159 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
The Impact of Resident- and Self-Evaluations on Surgeon’s Subsequent Teaching Performance Evaluation Period (dpeaa)DE-He213 Subsequent Performance (dpeaa)DE-He213 Teaching Performance (dpeaa)DE-He213 Residency Training Program (dpeaa)DE-He213 Resident Evaluation (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Evaluation Period misc Subsequent Performance misc Teaching Performance misc Residency Training Program misc Resident Evaluation |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Evaluation Period misc Subsequent Performance misc Teaching Performance misc Residency Training Program misc Resident Evaluation |
| topic_browse |
misc Evaluation Period misc Subsequent Performance misc Teaching Performance misc Residency Training Program misc Resident Evaluation |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
World Journal of Surgery |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR003391159 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
World Journal of Surgery |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR003391159 |
| title |
The Impact of Resident- and Self-Evaluations on Surgeon’s Subsequent Teaching Performance |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR003445151 (SPR)s00268-014-2655-3-e |
| title_full |
The Impact of Resident- and Self-Evaluations on Surgeon’s Subsequent Teaching Performance |
| author_sort |
Boerebach, Benjamin C. M. |
| journal |
World Journal of Surgery |
| journalStr |
World Journal of Surgery |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2014 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
2761 |
| author_browse |
Boerebach, Benjamin C. M. Arah, Onyebuchi A. Heineman, Maas Jan Busch, Olivier R. C. Lombarts, Kiki M. J. M. H. |
| container_volume |
38 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Boerebach, Benjamin C. M. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s00268-014-2655-3 |
| title_sort |
impact of resident- and self-evaluations on surgeon’s subsequent teaching performance |
| title_auth |
The Impact of Resident- and Self-Evaluations on Surgeon’s Subsequent Teaching Performance |
| abstract |
Background This study evaluates how residents’ evaluations and self-evaluations of surgeon’s teaching performance evolve after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Furthermore, the influence of over- and underestimating own performance on subsequent teaching performance was investigated. Methods In a multicenter cohort study, 351 surgeons evaluated themselves and were also evaluated by residents during annual evaluation periods for three subsequent years. At the end of each evaluation period, surgeons received a personal report summarizing the residents’ feedback. Changes in each surgeon’s teaching performance evaluated on a five-point scale were studied using growth models. The effect of surgeons over- or underestimating their own performance on the improvement of teaching performance was studied using adjusted multivariable regressions. Results Compared with the first (median score: 3.83, 20th to 80th percentile score: 3.46–4.16) and second (median: 3.82, 20th to 80th: 3.46–4.14) evaluation period, residents evaluated surgeon’s teaching performance higher during the third evaluation period (median: 3.91, 20th to 80th: 3.59–4.27), p < 0.001. Surgeons did not alter self-evaluation scores over the three periods. Surgeons who overestimated their teaching performance received lower subsequent performance scores by residents (regression coefficient b: −0.08, 95 % confidence limits (CL): −0.18, 0.02) and self (b: −0.12, 95 % CL: −0.21, −0.02). Surgeons who underestimated their performance subsequently scored themselves higher (b: 0.10, 95 % CL: 0.03, 0.16), but were evaluated equally by residents. Conclusions Residents’ evaluation of surgeon’s teaching performance was enhanced after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Overestimating own teaching performance could impede subsequent performance. © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014 |
| abstractGer |
Background This study evaluates how residents’ evaluations and self-evaluations of surgeon’s teaching performance evolve after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Furthermore, the influence of over- and underestimating own performance on subsequent teaching performance was investigated. Methods In a multicenter cohort study, 351 surgeons evaluated themselves and were also evaluated by residents during annual evaluation periods for three subsequent years. At the end of each evaluation period, surgeons received a personal report summarizing the residents’ feedback. Changes in each surgeon’s teaching performance evaluated on a five-point scale were studied using growth models. The effect of surgeons over- or underestimating their own performance on the improvement of teaching performance was studied using adjusted multivariable regressions. Results Compared with the first (median score: 3.83, 20th to 80th percentile score: 3.46–4.16) and second (median: 3.82, 20th to 80th: 3.46–4.14) evaluation period, residents evaluated surgeon’s teaching performance higher during the third evaluation period (median: 3.91, 20th to 80th: 3.59–4.27), p < 0.001. Surgeons did not alter self-evaluation scores over the three periods. Surgeons who overestimated their teaching performance received lower subsequent performance scores by residents (regression coefficient b: −0.08, 95 % confidence limits (CL): −0.18, 0.02) and self (b: −0.12, 95 % CL: −0.21, −0.02). Surgeons who underestimated their performance subsequently scored themselves higher (b: 0.10, 95 % CL: 0.03, 0.16), but were evaluated equally by residents. Conclusions Residents’ evaluation of surgeon’s teaching performance was enhanced after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Overestimating own teaching performance could impede subsequent performance. © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Background This study evaluates how residents’ evaluations and self-evaluations of surgeon’s teaching performance evolve after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Furthermore, the influence of over- and underestimating own performance on subsequent teaching performance was investigated. Methods In a multicenter cohort study, 351 surgeons evaluated themselves and were also evaluated by residents during annual evaluation periods for three subsequent years. At the end of each evaluation period, surgeons received a personal report summarizing the residents’ feedback. Changes in each surgeon’s teaching performance evaluated on a five-point scale were studied using growth models. The effect of surgeons over- or underestimating their own performance on the improvement of teaching performance was studied using adjusted multivariable regressions. Results Compared with the first (median score: 3.83, 20th to 80th percentile score: 3.46–4.16) and second (median: 3.82, 20th to 80th: 3.46–4.14) evaluation period, residents evaluated surgeon’s teaching performance higher during the third evaluation period (median: 3.91, 20th to 80th: 3.59–4.27), p < 0.001. Surgeons did not alter self-evaluation scores over the three periods. Surgeons who overestimated their teaching performance received lower subsequent performance scores by residents (regression coefficient b: −0.08, 95 % confidence limits (CL): −0.18, 0.02) and self (b: −0.12, 95 % CL: −0.21, −0.02). Surgeons who underestimated their performance subsequently scored themselves higher (b: 0.10, 95 % CL: 0.03, 0.16), but were evaluated equally by residents. Conclusions Residents’ evaluation of surgeon’s teaching performance was enhanced after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Overestimating own teaching performance could impede subsequent performance. © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
11 |
| title_short |
The Impact of Resident- and Self-Evaluations on Surgeon’s Subsequent Teaching Performance |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2655-3 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Arah, Onyebuchi A. Heineman, Maas Jan Busch, Olivier R. C. Lombarts, Kiki M. J. M. H. |
| author2Str |
Arah, Onyebuchi A. Heineman, Maas Jan Busch, Olivier R. C. Lombarts, Kiki M. J. M. H. |
| ppnlink |
SPR003391159 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s00268-014-2655-3 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T19:31:35.076Z |
| _version_ |
1803587519857557504 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR003445151</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328140121.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201001s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00268-014-2655-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR003445151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00268-014-2655-3-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Boerebach, Benjamin C. M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Impact of Resident- and Self-Evaluations on Surgeon’s Subsequent Teaching Performance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background This study evaluates how residents’ evaluations and self-evaluations of surgeon’s teaching performance evolve after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Furthermore, the influence of over- and underestimating own performance on subsequent teaching performance was investigated. Methods In a multicenter cohort study, 351 surgeons evaluated themselves and were also evaluated by residents during annual evaluation periods for three subsequent years. At the end of each evaluation period, surgeons received a personal report summarizing the residents’ feedback. Changes in each surgeon’s teaching performance evaluated on a five-point scale were studied using growth models. The effect of surgeons over- or underestimating their own performance on the improvement of teaching performance was studied using adjusted multivariable regressions. Results Compared with the first (median score: 3.83, 20th to 80th percentile score: 3.46–4.16) and second (median: 3.82, 20th to 80th: 3.46–4.14) evaluation period, residents evaluated surgeon’s teaching performance higher during the third evaluation period (median: 3.91, 20th to 80th: 3.59–4.27), p < 0.001. Surgeons did not alter self-evaluation scores over the three periods. Surgeons who overestimated their teaching performance received lower subsequent performance scores by residents (regression coefficient b: −0.08, 95 % confidence limits (CL): −0.18, 0.02) and self (b: −0.12, 95 % CL: −0.21, −0.02). Surgeons who underestimated their performance subsequently scored themselves higher (b: 0.10, 95 % CL: 0.03, 0.16), but were evaluated equally by residents. Conclusions Residents’ evaluation of surgeon’s teaching performance was enhanced after two cycles of evaluation, reporting, and feedback. Overestimating own teaching performance could impede subsequent performance.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation Period</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Subsequent Performance</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Teaching Performance</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Residency Training Program</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Resident Evaluation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arah, Onyebuchi A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Heineman, Maas Jan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Busch, Olivier R. C.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lombarts, Kiki M. J. M. H.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">World Journal of Surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">38(2014), 11 vom: 28. Mai, Seite 2761-2769</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR003391159</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:38</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:11</subfield><subfield code="g">day:28</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2761-2769</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2655-3</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">38</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">11</subfield><subfield code="b">28</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">2761-2769</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398983 |