Salvage by timed sequential chemotherapy in primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of prognostic factors
Abstract Primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has a very poor prognosis. Etoposide-mitoxantrone-cytarabine (EMA) timed sequential chemotherapy including a first sequence combining mitoxantrone (12 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over 3 days) with cytarabine (500 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over the same per...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Revesz, D. [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2003 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Springer-Verlag 2003 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Annals of hematology - Berlin : Springer, 1955, 82(2003), 11 vom: 19. Aug., Seite 684-690 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:82 ; year:2003 ; number:11 ; day:19 ; month:08 ; pages:684-690 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s00277-003-0730-1 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
SPR00372428X |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | SPR00372428X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230519110946.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 201001s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00277-003-0730-1 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)SPR00372428X | ||
035 | |a (SPR)s00277-003-0730-1-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Revesz, D. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Salvage by timed sequential chemotherapy in primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of prognostic factors |
264 | 1 | |c 2003 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Springer-Verlag 2003 | ||
520 | |a Abstract Primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has a very poor prognosis. Etoposide-mitoxantrone-cytarabine (EMA) timed sequential chemotherapy including a first sequence combining mitoxantrone (12 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over 3 days) with cytarabine (500 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over the same period), and a second sequence consisting in etoposide (200 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day for 3 days) and cytarabine as in the first sequence, has been proposed as a salvage regimen. Over a 10-year period, 66 primary resistant AML patients have been treated by EMA salvage chemotherapy. All patients displayed intermediate- or high-risk karyotypic abnormalities. Of the 66 patients, 24 [36%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 25–49%] achieved complete remission (CR). Thirty-eight patients were resistant to EMA chemotherapy and four patients died from toxicity during aplasia. After CR achievement, 18 patients received consolidation therapy. Five patients with an HLA-identical sibling donor underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), one patient received autologous SCT, two patients received a second course of EMA chemotherapy, and ten were scheduled for 6-monthly maintenance courses (mini-EMA). Median follow-up was 7.3 years. At the time of analysis, 21 of the 24 patients (87%) who achieved CR have relapsed. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 5 months (95% CI: 4.3–7.7 months). Median overall survival (OS) was 5 months (95% CI: 3.8–6.7 months). There were only two long-term remitters (3%). In the univariate analysis, CR achievement was mainly related to white blood cell (WBC) count at the time of starting salvage therapy with poorer outcome for patients with more aggressive leukemia (WBC count ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l) (CR rates: 50% vs 10%, p<0.001). Overall survival was also influence by WBC count (median OS: 7.2 months vs 2.8 months, respectively, for WBC <and ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l, p<0.0001). Initial karyotype was not a significant prognostic factor either for CR achievement or for DFS or OS when comparing patients with normal karyotype and those with chromosomal abnormality. In multivariate analysis, WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l with the absence of circulating blasts at the time of starting salvage therapy appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for CR achievement (p=0.002), while WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for survival (p<0.0001). Using these two objective parameters of proven significance, we devised a prognostic system of immediate clinical utility for prognostic stratification and risk-adapted therapeutic choices. Patients with both factors (WBC count <10×$ 10^{9} $/l and no circulating blasts) or with at least one at the time of starting salvage therapy had a CR rate of 50% and were therefore candidates for intensified post-remission therapy. All other patients displayed a very poor outcome and must be oriented after failure of first-line therapy to alternate therapeutic programs based on investigational drugs. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Prognosis |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Acute myeloid leukemia |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Resistance |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Salvage chemotherapy |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
700 | 1 | |a Chelghoum, Y. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Le, Q. H. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Elhamri, M. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Michallet, M. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Thomas, X. |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Annals of hematology |d Berlin : Springer, 1955 |g 82(2003), 11 vom: 19. Aug., Seite 684-690 |w (DE-627)253389852 |w (DE-600)1458429-3 |x 1432-0584 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:82 |g year:2003 |g number:11 |g day:19 |g month:08 |g pages:684-690 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-003-0730-1 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_101 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_138 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_171 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_250 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_267 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_281 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_636 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_711 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2031 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2039 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2057 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2070 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2086 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2093 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2106 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2107 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2108 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2116 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2119 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2144 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2188 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2446 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2472 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2548 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4246 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 82 |j 2003 |e 11 |b 19 |c 08 |h 684-690 |
author_variant |
d r dr y c yc q h l qh qhl m e me m m mm x t xt |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:14320584:2003----::avgbtmdeunilhmteaynrmrrssatctmeodekma |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2003 |
publishDate |
2003 |
allfields |
10.1007/s00277-003-0730-1 doi (DE-627)SPR00372428X (SPR)s00277-003-0730-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Revesz, D. verfasserin aut Salvage by timed sequential chemotherapy in primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of prognostic factors 2003 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag 2003 Abstract Primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has a very poor prognosis. Etoposide-mitoxantrone-cytarabine (EMA) timed sequential chemotherapy including a first sequence combining mitoxantrone (12 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over 3 days) with cytarabine (500 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over the same period), and a second sequence consisting in etoposide (200 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day for 3 days) and cytarabine as in the first sequence, has been proposed as a salvage regimen. Over a 10-year period, 66 primary resistant AML patients have been treated by EMA salvage chemotherapy. All patients displayed intermediate- or high-risk karyotypic abnormalities. Of the 66 patients, 24 [36%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 25–49%] achieved complete remission (CR). Thirty-eight patients were resistant to EMA chemotherapy and four patients died from toxicity during aplasia. After CR achievement, 18 patients received consolidation therapy. Five patients with an HLA-identical sibling donor underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), one patient received autologous SCT, two patients received a second course of EMA chemotherapy, and ten were scheduled for 6-monthly maintenance courses (mini-EMA). Median follow-up was 7.3 years. At the time of analysis, 21 of the 24 patients (87%) who achieved CR have relapsed. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 5 months (95% CI: 4.3–7.7 months). Median overall survival (OS) was 5 months (95% CI: 3.8–6.7 months). There were only two long-term remitters (3%). In the univariate analysis, CR achievement was mainly related to white blood cell (WBC) count at the time of starting salvage therapy with poorer outcome for patients with more aggressive leukemia (WBC count ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l) (CR rates: 50% vs 10%, p<0.001). Overall survival was also influence by WBC count (median OS: 7.2 months vs 2.8 months, respectively, for WBC <and ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l, p<0.0001). Initial karyotype was not a significant prognostic factor either for CR achievement or for DFS or OS when comparing patients with normal karyotype and those with chromosomal abnormality. In multivariate analysis, WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l with the absence of circulating blasts at the time of starting salvage therapy appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for CR achievement (p=0.002), while WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for survival (p<0.0001). Using these two objective parameters of proven significance, we devised a prognostic system of immediate clinical utility for prognostic stratification and risk-adapted therapeutic choices. Patients with both factors (WBC count <10×$ 10^{9} $/l and no circulating blasts) or with at least one at the time of starting salvage therapy had a CR rate of 50% and were therefore candidates for intensified post-remission therapy. All other patients displayed a very poor outcome and must be oriented after failure of first-line therapy to alternate therapeutic programs based on investigational drugs. Prognosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acute myeloid leukemia (dpeaa)DE-He213 Resistance (dpeaa)DE-He213 Salvage chemotherapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Chelghoum, Y. aut Le, Q. H. aut Elhamri, M. aut Michallet, M. aut Thomas, X. aut Enthalten in Annals of hematology Berlin : Springer, 1955 82(2003), 11 vom: 19. Aug., Seite 684-690 (DE-627)253389852 (DE-600)1458429-3 1432-0584 nnns volume:82 year:2003 number:11 day:19 month:08 pages:684-690 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-003-0730-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 82 2003 11 19 08 684-690 |
spelling |
10.1007/s00277-003-0730-1 doi (DE-627)SPR00372428X (SPR)s00277-003-0730-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Revesz, D. verfasserin aut Salvage by timed sequential chemotherapy in primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of prognostic factors 2003 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag 2003 Abstract Primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has a very poor prognosis. Etoposide-mitoxantrone-cytarabine (EMA) timed sequential chemotherapy including a first sequence combining mitoxantrone (12 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over 3 days) with cytarabine (500 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over the same period), and a second sequence consisting in etoposide (200 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day for 3 days) and cytarabine as in the first sequence, has been proposed as a salvage regimen. Over a 10-year period, 66 primary resistant AML patients have been treated by EMA salvage chemotherapy. All patients displayed intermediate- or high-risk karyotypic abnormalities. Of the 66 patients, 24 [36%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 25–49%] achieved complete remission (CR). Thirty-eight patients were resistant to EMA chemotherapy and four patients died from toxicity during aplasia. After CR achievement, 18 patients received consolidation therapy. Five patients with an HLA-identical sibling donor underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), one patient received autologous SCT, two patients received a second course of EMA chemotherapy, and ten were scheduled for 6-monthly maintenance courses (mini-EMA). Median follow-up was 7.3 years. At the time of analysis, 21 of the 24 patients (87%) who achieved CR have relapsed. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 5 months (95% CI: 4.3–7.7 months). Median overall survival (OS) was 5 months (95% CI: 3.8–6.7 months). There were only two long-term remitters (3%). In the univariate analysis, CR achievement was mainly related to white blood cell (WBC) count at the time of starting salvage therapy with poorer outcome for patients with more aggressive leukemia (WBC count ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l) (CR rates: 50% vs 10%, p<0.001). Overall survival was also influence by WBC count (median OS: 7.2 months vs 2.8 months, respectively, for WBC <and ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l, p<0.0001). Initial karyotype was not a significant prognostic factor either for CR achievement or for DFS or OS when comparing patients with normal karyotype and those with chromosomal abnormality. In multivariate analysis, WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l with the absence of circulating blasts at the time of starting salvage therapy appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for CR achievement (p=0.002), while WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for survival (p<0.0001). Using these two objective parameters of proven significance, we devised a prognostic system of immediate clinical utility for prognostic stratification and risk-adapted therapeutic choices. Patients with both factors (WBC count <10×$ 10^{9} $/l and no circulating blasts) or with at least one at the time of starting salvage therapy had a CR rate of 50% and were therefore candidates for intensified post-remission therapy. All other patients displayed a very poor outcome and must be oriented after failure of first-line therapy to alternate therapeutic programs based on investigational drugs. Prognosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acute myeloid leukemia (dpeaa)DE-He213 Resistance (dpeaa)DE-He213 Salvage chemotherapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Chelghoum, Y. aut Le, Q. H. aut Elhamri, M. aut Michallet, M. aut Thomas, X. aut Enthalten in Annals of hematology Berlin : Springer, 1955 82(2003), 11 vom: 19. Aug., Seite 684-690 (DE-627)253389852 (DE-600)1458429-3 1432-0584 nnns volume:82 year:2003 number:11 day:19 month:08 pages:684-690 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-003-0730-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 82 2003 11 19 08 684-690 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s00277-003-0730-1 doi (DE-627)SPR00372428X (SPR)s00277-003-0730-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Revesz, D. verfasserin aut Salvage by timed sequential chemotherapy in primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of prognostic factors 2003 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag 2003 Abstract Primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has a very poor prognosis. Etoposide-mitoxantrone-cytarabine (EMA) timed sequential chemotherapy including a first sequence combining mitoxantrone (12 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over 3 days) with cytarabine (500 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over the same period), and a second sequence consisting in etoposide (200 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day for 3 days) and cytarabine as in the first sequence, has been proposed as a salvage regimen. Over a 10-year period, 66 primary resistant AML patients have been treated by EMA salvage chemotherapy. All patients displayed intermediate- or high-risk karyotypic abnormalities. Of the 66 patients, 24 [36%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 25–49%] achieved complete remission (CR). Thirty-eight patients were resistant to EMA chemotherapy and four patients died from toxicity during aplasia. After CR achievement, 18 patients received consolidation therapy. Five patients with an HLA-identical sibling donor underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), one patient received autologous SCT, two patients received a second course of EMA chemotherapy, and ten were scheduled for 6-monthly maintenance courses (mini-EMA). Median follow-up was 7.3 years. At the time of analysis, 21 of the 24 patients (87%) who achieved CR have relapsed. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 5 months (95% CI: 4.3–7.7 months). Median overall survival (OS) was 5 months (95% CI: 3.8–6.7 months). There were only two long-term remitters (3%). In the univariate analysis, CR achievement was mainly related to white blood cell (WBC) count at the time of starting salvage therapy with poorer outcome for patients with more aggressive leukemia (WBC count ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l) (CR rates: 50% vs 10%, p<0.001). Overall survival was also influence by WBC count (median OS: 7.2 months vs 2.8 months, respectively, for WBC <and ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l, p<0.0001). Initial karyotype was not a significant prognostic factor either for CR achievement or for DFS or OS when comparing patients with normal karyotype and those with chromosomal abnormality. In multivariate analysis, WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l with the absence of circulating blasts at the time of starting salvage therapy appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for CR achievement (p=0.002), while WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for survival (p<0.0001). Using these two objective parameters of proven significance, we devised a prognostic system of immediate clinical utility for prognostic stratification and risk-adapted therapeutic choices. Patients with both factors (WBC count <10×$ 10^{9} $/l and no circulating blasts) or with at least one at the time of starting salvage therapy had a CR rate of 50% and were therefore candidates for intensified post-remission therapy. All other patients displayed a very poor outcome and must be oriented after failure of first-line therapy to alternate therapeutic programs based on investigational drugs. Prognosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acute myeloid leukemia (dpeaa)DE-He213 Resistance (dpeaa)DE-He213 Salvage chemotherapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Chelghoum, Y. aut Le, Q. H. aut Elhamri, M. aut Michallet, M. aut Thomas, X. aut Enthalten in Annals of hematology Berlin : Springer, 1955 82(2003), 11 vom: 19. Aug., Seite 684-690 (DE-627)253389852 (DE-600)1458429-3 1432-0584 nnns volume:82 year:2003 number:11 day:19 month:08 pages:684-690 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-003-0730-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 82 2003 11 19 08 684-690 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s00277-003-0730-1 doi (DE-627)SPR00372428X (SPR)s00277-003-0730-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Revesz, D. verfasserin aut Salvage by timed sequential chemotherapy in primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of prognostic factors 2003 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag 2003 Abstract Primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has a very poor prognosis. Etoposide-mitoxantrone-cytarabine (EMA) timed sequential chemotherapy including a first sequence combining mitoxantrone (12 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over 3 days) with cytarabine (500 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over the same period), and a second sequence consisting in etoposide (200 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day for 3 days) and cytarabine as in the first sequence, has been proposed as a salvage regimen. Over a 10-year period, 66 primary resistant AML patients have been treated by EMA salvage chemotherapy. All patients displayed intermediate- or high-risk karyotypic abnormalities. Of the 66 patients, 24 [36%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 25–49%] achieved complete remission (CR). Thirty-eight patients were resistant to EMA chemotherapy and four patients died from toxicity during aplasia. After CR achievement, 18 patients received consolidation therapy. Five patients with an HLA-identical sibling donor underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), one patient received autologous SCT, two patients received a second course of EMA chemotherapy, and ten were scheduled for 6-monthly maintenance courses (mini-EMA). Median follow-up was 7.3 years. At the time of analysis, 21 of the 24 patients (87%) who achieved CR have relapsed. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 5 months (95% CI: 4.3–7.7 months). Median overall survival (OS) was 5 months (95% CI: 3.8–6.7 months). There were only two long-term remitters (3%). In the univariate analysis, CR achievement was mainly related to white blood cell (WBC) count at the time of starting salvage therapy with poorer outcome for patients with more aggressive leukemia (WBC count ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l) (CR rates: 50% vs 10%, p<0.001). Overall survival was also influence by WBC count (median OS: 7.2 months vs 2.8 months, respectively, for WBC <and ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l, p<0.0001). Initial karyotype was not a significant prognostic factor either for CR achievement or for DFS or OS when comparing patients with normal karyotype and those with chromosomal abnormality. In multivariate analysis, WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l with the absence of circulating blasts at the time of starting salvage therapy appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for CR achievement (p=0.002), while WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for survival (p<0.0001). Using these two objective parameters of proven significance, we devised a prognostic system of immediate clinical utility for prognostic stratification and risk-adapted therapeutic choices. Patients with both factors (WBC count <10×$ 10^{9} $/l and no circulating blasts) or with at least one at the time of starting salvage therapy had a CR rate of 50% and were therefore candidates for intensified post-remission therapy. All other patients displayed a very poor outcome and must be oriented after failure of first-line therapy to alternate therapeutic programs based on investigational drugs. Prognosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acute myeloid leukemia (dpeaa)DE-He213 Resistance (dpeaa)DE-He213 Salvage chemotherapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Chelghoum, Y. aut Le, Q. H. aut Elhamri, M. aut Michallet, M. aut Thomas, X. aut Enthalten in Annals of hematology Berlin : Springer, 1955 82(2003), 11 vom: 19. Aug., Seite 684-690 (DE-627)253389852 (DE-600)1458429-3 1432-0584 nnns volume:82 year:2003 number:11 day:19 month:08 pages:684-690 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-003-0730-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 82 2003 11 19 08 684-690 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s00277-003-0730-1 doi (DE-627)SPR00372428X (SPR)s00277-003-0730-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Revesz, D. verfasserin aut Salvage by timed sequential chemotherapy in primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of prognostic factors 2003 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag 2003 Abstract Primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has a very poor prognosis. Etoposide-mitoxantrone-cytarabine (EMA) timed sequential chemotherapy including a first sequence combining mitoxantrone (12 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over 3 days) with cytarabine (500 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over the same period), and a second sequence consisting in etoposide (200 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day for 3 days) and cytarabine as in the first sequence, has been proposed as a salvage regimen. Over a 10-year period, 66 primary resistant AML patients have been treated by EMA salvage chemotherapy. All patients displayed intermediate- or high-risk karyotypic abnormalities. Of the 66 patients, 24 [36%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 25–49%] achieved complete remission (CR). Thirty-eight patients were resistant to EMA chemotherapy and four patients died from toxicity during aplasia. After CR achievement, 18 patients received consolidation therapy. Five patients with an HLA-identical sibling donor underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), one patient received autologous SCT, two patients received a second course of EMA chemotherapy, and ten were scheduled for 6-monthly maintenance courses (mini-EMA). Median follow-up was 7.3 years. At the time of analysis, 21 of the 24 patients (87%) who achieved CR have relapsed. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 5 months (95% CI: 4.3–7.7 months). Median overall survival (OS) was 5 months (95% CI: 3.8–6.7 months). There were only two long-term remitters (3%). In the univariate analysis, CR achievement was mainly related to white blood cell (WBC) count at the time of starting salvage therapy with poorer outcome for patients with more aggressive leukemia (WBC count ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l) (CR rates: 50% vs 10%, p<0.001). Overall survival was also influence by WBC count (median OS: 7.2 months vs 2.8 months, respectively, for WBC <and ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l, p<0.0001). Initial karyotype was not a significant prognostic factor either for CR achievement or for DFS or OS when comparing patients with normal karyotype and those with chromosomal abnormality. In multivariate analysis, WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l with the absence of circulating blasts at the time of starting salvage therapy appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for CR achievement (p=0.002), while WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for survival (p<0.0001). Using these two objective parameters of proven significance, we devised a prognostic system of immediate clinical utility for prognostic stratification and risk-adapted therapeutic choices. Patients with both factors (WBC count <10×$ 10^{9} $/l and no circulating blasts) or with at least one at the time of starting salvage therapy had a CR rate of 50% and were therefore candidates for intensified post-remission therapy. All other patients displayed a very poor outcome and must be oriented after failure of first-line therapy to alternate therapeutic programs based on investigational drugs. Prognosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acute myeloid leukemia (dpeaa)DE-He213 Resistance (dpeaa)DE-He213 Salvage chemotherapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Chelghoum, Y. aut Le, Q. H. aut Elhamri, M. aut Michallet, M. aut Thomas, X. aut Enthalten in Annals of hematology Berlin : Springer, 1955 82(2003), 11 vom: 19. Aug., Seite 684-690 (DE-627)253389852 (DE-600)1458429-3 1432-0584 nnns volume:82 year:2003 number:11 day:19 month:08 pages:684-690 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-003-0730-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 82 2003 11 19 08 684-690 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Annals of hematology 82(2003), 11 vom: 19. Aug., Seite 684-690 volume:82 year:2003 number:11 day:19 month:08 pages:684-690 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Annals of hematology 82(2003), 11 vom: 19. Aug., Seite 684-690 volume:82 year:2003 number:11 day:19 month:08 pages:684-690 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Prognosis Acute myeloid leukemia Resistance Salvage chemotherapy |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Annals of hematology |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Revesz, D. @@aut@@ Chelghoum, Y. @@aut@@ Le, Q. H. @@aut@@ Elhamri, M. @@aut@@ Michallet, M. @@aut@@ Thomas, X. @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2003-08-19T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
253389852 |
id |
SPR00372428X |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR00372428X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519110946.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201001s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00277-003-0730-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR00372428X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00277-003-0730-1-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Revesz, D.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Salvage by timed sequential chemotherapy in primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of prognostic factors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer-Verlag 2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has a very poor prognosis. Etoposide-mitoxantrone-cytarabine (EMA) timed sequential chemotherapy including a first sequence combining mitoxantrone (12 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over 3 days) with cytarabine (500 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over the same period), and a second sequence consisting in etoposide (200 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day for 3 days) and cytarabine as in the first sequence, has been proposed as a salvage regimen. Over a 10-year period, 66 primary resistant AML patients have been treated by EMA salvage chemotherapy. All patients displayed intermediate- or high-risk karyotypic abnormalities. Of the 66 patients, 24 [36%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 25–49%] achieved complete remission (CR). Thirty-eight patients were resistant to EMA chemotherapy and four patients died from toxicity during aplasia. After CR achievement, 18 patients received consolidation therapy. Five patients with an HLA-identical sibling donor underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), one patient received autologous SCT, two patients received a second course of EMA chemotherapy, and ten were scheduled for 6-monthly maintenance courses (mini-EMA). Median follow-up was 7.3 years. At the time of analysis, 21 of the 24 patients (87%) who achieved CR have relapsed. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 5 months (95% CI: 4.3–7.7 months). Median overall survival (OS) was 5 months (95% CI: 3.8–6.7 months). There were only two long-term remitters (3%). In the univariate analysis, CR achievement was mainly related to white blood cell (WBC) count at the time of starting salvage therapy with poorer outcome for patients with more aggressive leukemia (WBC count ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l) (CR rates: 50% vs 10%, p<0.001). Overall survival was also influence by WBC count (median OS: 7.2 months vs 2.8 months, respectively, for WBC <and ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l, p<0.0001). Initial karyotype was not a significant prognostic factor either for CR achievement or for DFS or OS when comparing patients with normal karyotype and those with chromosomal abnormality. In multivariate analysis, WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l with the absence of circulating blasts at the time of starting salvage therapy appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for CR achievement (p=0.002), while WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for survival (p<0.0001). Using these two objective parameters of proven significance, we devised a prognostic system of immediate clinical utility for prognostic stratification and risk-adapted therapeutic choices. Patients with both factors (WBC count <10×$ 10^{9} $/l and no circulating blasts) or with at least one at the time of starting salvage therapy had a CR rate of 50% and were therefore candidates for intensified post-remission therapy. All other patients displayed a very poor outcome and must be oriented after failure of first-line therapy to alternate therapeutic programs based on investigational drugs.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Prognosis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Acute myeloid leukemia</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Resistance</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Salvage chemotherapy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chelghoum, Y.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Le, Q. H.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elhamri, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michallet, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Thomas, X.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Annals of hematology</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 1955</subfield><subfield code="g">82(2003), 11 vom: 19. Aug., Seite 684-690</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)253389852</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1458429-3</subfield><subfield code="x">1432-0584</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:82</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2003</subfield><subfield code="g">number:11</subfield><subfield code="g">day:19</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:684-690</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-003-0730-1</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_711</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2070</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">82</subfield><subfield code="j">2003</subfield><subfield code="e">11</subfield><subfield code="b">19</subfield><subfield code="c">08</subfield><subfield code="h">684-690</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Revesz, D. |
spellingShingle |
Revesz, D. misc Prognosis misc Acute myeloid leukemia misc Resistance misc Salvage chemotherapy Salvage by timed sequential chemotherapy in primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of prognostic factors |
authorStr |
Revesz, D. |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)253389852 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
springer |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1432-0584 |
topic_title |
Salvage by timed sequential chemotherapy in primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of prognostic factors Prognosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acute myeloid leukemia (dpeaa)DE-He213 Resistance (dpeaa)DE-He213 Salvage chemotherapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
topic |
misc Prognosis misc Acute myeloid leukemia misc Resistance misc Salvage chemotherapy |
topic_unstemmed |
misc Prognosis misc Acute myeloid leukemia misc Resistance misc Salvage chemotherapy |
topic_browse |
misc Prognosis misc Acute myeloid leukemia misc Resistance misc Salvage chemotherapy |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Annals of hematology |
hierarchy_parent_id |
253389852 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Annals of hematology |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)253389852 (DE-600)1458429-3 |
title |
Salvage by timed sequential chemotherapy in primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of prognostic factors |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR00372428X (SPR)s00277-003-0730-1-e |
title_full |
Salvage by timed sequential chemotherapy in primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of prognostic factors |
author_sort |
Revesz, D. |
journal |
Annals of hematology |
journalStr |
Annals of hematology |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2003 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
684 |
author_browse |
Revesz, D. Chelghoum, Y. Le, Q. H. Elhamri, M. Michallet, M. Thomas, X. |
container_volume |
82 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Revesz, D. |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s00277-003-0730-1 |
title_sort |
salvage by timed sequential chemotherapy in primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of prognostic factors |
title_auth |
Salvage by timed sequential chemotherapy in primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of prognostic factors |
abstract |
Abstract Primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has a very poor prognosis. Etoposide-mitoxantrone-cytarabine (EMA) timed sequential chemotherapy including a first sequence combining mitoxantrone (12 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over 3 days) with cytarabine (500 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over the same period), and a second sequence consisting in etoposide (200 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day for 3 days) and cytarabine as in the first sequence, has been proposed as a salvage regimen. Over a 10-year period, 66 primary resistant AML patients have been treated by EMA salvage chemotherapy. All patients displayed intermediate- or high-risk karyotypic abnormalities. Of the 66 patients, 24 [36%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 25–49%] achieved complete remission (CR). Thirty-eight patients were resistant to EMA chemotherapy and four patients died from toxicity during aplasia. After CR achievement, 18 patients received consolidation therapy. Five patients with an HLA-identical sibling donor underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), one patient received autologous SCT, two patients received a second course of EMA chemotherapy, and ten were scheduled for 6-monthly maintenance courses (mini-EMA). Median follow-up was 7.3 years. At the time of analysis, 21 of the 24 patients (87%) who achieved CR have relapsed. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 5 months (95% CI: 4.3–7.7 months). Median overall survival (OS) was 5 months (95% CI: 3.8–6.7 months). There were only two long-term remitters (3%). In the univariate analysis, CR achievement was mainly related to white blood cell (WBC) count at the time of starting salvage therapy with poorer outcome for patients with more aggressive leukemia (WBC count ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l) (CR rates: 50% vs 10%, p<0.001). Overall survival was also influence by WBC count (median OS: 7.2 months vs 2.8 months, respectively, for WBC <and ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l, p<0.0001). Initial karyotype was not a significant prognostic factor either for CR achievement or for DFS or OS when comparing patients with normal karyotype and those with chromosomal abnormality. In multivariate analysis, WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l with the absence of circulating blasts at the time of starting salvage therapy appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for CR achievement (p=0.002), while WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for survival (p<0.0001). Using these two objective parameters of proven significance, we devised a prognostic system of immediate clinical utility for prognostic stratification and risk-adapted therapeutic choices. Patients with both factors (WBC count <10×$ 10^{9} $/l and no circulating blasts) or with at least one at the time of starting salvage therapy had a CR rate of 50% and were therefore candidates for intensified post-remission therapy. All other patients displayed a very poor outcome and must be oriented after failure of first-line therapy to alternate therapeutic programs based on investigational drugs. © Springer-Verlag 2003 |
abstractGer |
Abstract Primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has a very poor prognosis. Etoposide-mitoxantrone-cytarabine (EMA) timed sequential chemotherapy including a first sequence combining mitoxantrone (12 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over 3 days) with cytarabine (500 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over the same period), and a second sequence consisting in etoposide (200 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day for 3 days) and cytarabine as in the first sequence, has been proposed as a salvage regimen. Over a 10-year period, 66 primary resistant AML patients have been treated by EMA salvage chemotherapy. All patients displayed intermediate- or high-risk karyotypic abnormalities. Of the 66 patients, 24 [36%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 25–49%] achieved complete remission (CR). Thirty-eight patients were resistant to EMA chemotherapy and four patients died from toxicity during aplasia. After CR achievement, 18 patients received consolidation therapy. Five patients with an HLA-identical sibling donor underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), one patient received autologous SCT, two patients received a second course of EMA chemotherapy, and ten were scheduled for 6-monthly maintenance courses (mini-EMA). Median follow-up was 7.3 years. At the time of analysis, 21 of the 24 patients (87%) who achieved CR have relapsed. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 5 months (95% CI: 4.3–7.7 months). Median overall survival (OS) was 5 months (95% CI: 3.8–6.7 months). There were only two long-term remitters (3%). In the univariate analysis, CR achievement was mainly related to white blood cell (WBC) count at the time of starting salvage therapy with poorer outcome for patients with more aggressive leukemia (WBC count ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l) (CR rates: 50% vs 10%, p<0.001). Overall survival was also influence by WBC count (median OS: 7.2 months vs 2.8 months, respectively, for WBC <and ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l, p<0.0001). Initial karyotype was not a significant prognostic factor either for CR achievement or for DFS or OS when comparing patients with normal karyotype and those with chromosomal abnormality. In multivariate analysis, WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l with the absence of circulating blasts at the time of starting salvage therapy appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for CR achievement (p=0.002), while WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for survival (p<0.0001). Using these two objective parameters of proven significance, we devised a prognostic system of immediate clinical utility for prognostic stratification and risk-adapted therapeutic choices. Patients with both factors (WBC count <10×$ 10^{9} $/l and no circulating blasts) or with at least one at the time of starting salvage therapy had a CR rate of 50% and were therefore candidates for intensified post-remission therapy. All other patients displayed a very poor outcome and must be oriented after failure of first-line therapy to alternate therapeutic programs based on investigational drugs. © Springer-Verlag 2003 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has a very poor prognosis. Etoposide-mitoxantrone-cytarabine (EMA) timed sequential chemotherapy including a first sequence combining mitoxantrone (12 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over 3 days) with cytarabine (500 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over the same period), and a second sequence consisting in etoposide (200 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day for 3 days) and cytarabine as in the first sequence, has been proposed as a salvage regimen. Over a 10-year period, 66 primary resistant AML patients have been treated by EMA salvage chemotherapy. All patients displayed intermediate- or high-risk karyotypic abnormalities. Of the 66 patients, 24 [36%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 25–49%] achieved complete remission (CR). Thirty-eight patients were resistant to EMA chemotherapy and four patients died from toxicity during aplasia. After CR achievement, 18 patients received consolidation therapy. Five patients with an HLA-identical sibling donor underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), one patient received autologous SCT, two patients received a second course of EMA chemotherapy, and ten were scheduled for 6-monthly maintenance courses (mini-EMA). Median follow-up was 7.3 years. At the time of analysis, 21 of the 24 patients (87%) who achieved CR have relapsed. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 5 months (95% CI: 4.3–7.7 months). Median overall survival (OS) was 5 months (95% CI: 3.8–6.7 months). There were only two long-term remitters (3%). In the univariate analysis, CR achievement was mainly related to white blood cell (WBC) count at the time of starting salvage therapy with poorer outcome for patients with more aggressive leukemia (WBC count ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l) (CR rates: 50% vs 10%, p<0.001). Overall survival was also influence by WBC count (median OS: 7.2 months vs 2.8 months, respectively, for WBC <and ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l, p<0.0001). Initial karyotype was not a significant prognostic factor either for CR achievement or for DFS or OS when comparing patients with normal karyotype and those with chromosomal abnormality. In multivariate analysis, WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l with the absence of circulating blasts at the time of starting salvage therapy appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for CR achievement (p=0.002), while WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for survival (p<0.0001). Using these two objective parameters of proven significance, we devised a prognostic system of immediate clinical utility for prognostic stratification and risk-adapted therapeutic choices. Patients with both factors (WBC count <10×$ 10^{9} $/l and no circulating blasts) or with at least one at the time of starting salvage therapy had a CR rate of 50% and were therefore candidates for intensified post-remission therapy. All other patients displayed a very poor outcome and must be oriented after failure of first-line therapy to alternate therapeutic programs based on investigational drugs. © Springer-Verlag 2003 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
11 |
title_short |
Salvage by timed sequential chemotherapy in primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of prognostic factors |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-003-0730-1 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Chelghoum, Y. Le, Q. H. Elhamri, M. Michallet, M. Thomas, X. |
author2Str |
Chelghoum, Y. Le, Q. H. Elhamri, M. Michallet, M. Thomas, X. |
ppnlink |
253389852 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s00277-003-0730-1 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T21:15:16.151Z |
_version_ |
1803594043129593856 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR00372428X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519110946.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201001s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00277-003-0730-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR00372428X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00277-003-0730-1-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Revesz, D.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Salvage by timed sequential chemotherapy in primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of prognostic factors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer-Verlag 2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Primary resistant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has a very poor prognosis. Etoposide-mitoxantrone-cytarabine (EMA) timed sequential chemotherapy including a first sequence combining mitoxantrone (12 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over 3 days) with cytarabine (500 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day over the same period), and a second sequence consisting in etoposide (200 mg/$ m^{2} $ per day for 3 days) and cytarabine as in the first sequence, has been proposed as a salvage regimen. Over a 10-year period, 66 primary resistant AML patients have been treated by EMA salvage chemotherapy. All patients displayed intermediate- or high-risk karyotypic abnormalities. Of the 66 patients, 24 [36%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 25–49%] achieved complete remission (CR). Thirty-eight patients were resistant to EMA chemotherapy and four patients died from toxicity during aplasia. After CR achievement, 18 patients received consolidation therapy. Five patients with an HLA-identical sibling donor underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), one patient received autologous SCT, two patients received a second course of EMA chemotherapy, and ten were scheduled for 6-monthly maintenance courses (mini-EMA). Median follow-up was 7.3 years. At the time of analysis, 21 of the 24 patients (87%) who achieved CR have relapsed. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 5 months (95% CI: 4.3–7.7 months). Median overall survival (OS) was 5 months (95% CI: 3.8–6.7 months). There were only two long-term remitters (3%). In the univariate analysis, CR achievement was mainly related to white blood cell (WBC) count at the time of starting salvage therapy with poorer outcome for patients with more aggressive leukemia (WBC count ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l) (CR rates: 50% vs 10%, p<0.001). Overall survival was also influence by WBC count (median OS: 7.2 months vs 2.8 months, respectively, for WBC <and ≥10×$ 10^{9} $/l, p<0.0001). Initial karyotype was not a significant prognostic factor either for CR achievement or for DFS or OS when comparing patients with normal karyotype and those with chromosomal abnormality. In multivariate analysis, WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l with the absence of circulating blasts at the time of starting salvage therapy appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for CR achievement (p=0.002), while WBC count less than 10×$ 10^{9} $/l appeared to be of favorable prognostic value for survival (p<0.0001). Using these two objective parameters of proven significance, we devised a prognostic system of immediate clinical utility for prognostic stratification and risk-adapted therapeutic choices. Patients with both factors (WBC count <10×$ 10^{9} $/l and no circulating blasts) or with at least one at the time of starting salvage therapy had a CR rate of 50% and were therefore candidates for intensified post-remission therapy. All other patients displayed a very poor outcome and must be oriented after failure of first-line therapy to alternate therapeutic programs based on investigational drugs.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Prognosis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Acute myeloid leukemia</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Resistance</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Salvage chemotherapy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chelghoum, Y.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Le, Q. H.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elhamri, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michallet, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Thomas, X.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Annals of hematology</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 1955</subfield><subfield code="g">82(2003), 11 vom: 19. Aug., Seite 684-690</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)253389852</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1458429-3</subfield><subfield code="x">1432-0584</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:82</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2003</subfield><subfield code="g">number:11</subfield><subfield code="g">day:19</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:684-690</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-003-0730-1</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_711</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2070</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">82</subfield><subfield code="j">2003</subfield><subfield code="e">11</subfield><subfield code="b">19</subfield><subfield code="c">08</subfield><subfield code="h">684-690</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4009056 |