Is Toupet fundoplication the procedure of choice for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease? Results of a prospective randomized experimental trial comparing three major antireflux operations in a porcine model
Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is among the most common dysfunctions of the upper gastrointestinal tract. It interferes with quality of life and is a risk factor for the development of adenocarcinoma in the lower esophagus. Laparoscopic fundoplication is an effective treatment of...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Bachmann, K. [verfasserIn] Wachowiak, R. [verfasserIn] Rempf, C. [verfasserIn] Vashist, Y. [verfasserIn] Mann, O. [verfasserIn] Yekebas, E. F. [verfasserIn] Izbicki, J. R. [verfasserIn] Gawad, K. A. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2011 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Surgical endoscopy and other interventional techniques - New York, NY : Springer, 1987, 25(2011), 10 vom: 14. Mai, Seite 3235-3244 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:25 ; year:2011 ; number:10 ; day:14 ; month:05 ; pages:3235-3244 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s00464-011-1699-9 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR006286763 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR006286763 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230519093841.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201002s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00464-011-1699-9 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR006286763 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s00464-011-1699-9-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q ASE |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q ASE |
| 084 | |a 44.87 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bachmann, K. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is Toupet fundoplication the procedure of choice for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease? Results of a prospective randomized experimental trial comparing three major antireflux operations in a porcine model |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2011 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is among the most common dysfunctions of the upper gastrointestinal tract. It interferes with quality of life and is a risk factor for the development of adenocarcinoma in the lower esophagus. Laparoscopic fundoplication is an effective treatment of GERD, but the physiologic mechanisms of the different available procedures had not been investigated to date. Methods In this study, 28 German Landrace pigs underwent baseline manometry and 24-h pH monitoring followed by myotomy to induce reflux esophagitis. After new-onset reflux was proved, the pigs were randomized to groups based on four treatments: total fundoplication, anterior hemifundoplication, posterior hemifundoplication, and control. On days 10 and 60 after the intervention, the effectiveness of the different fundoplication modifications was compared with that of the control subjects by 24-h pH monitoring manometry. Finally, the pigs were killed, after which the minimum volume and pressure required to breach the gastroesophageal junction were recorded. Results After myotomy, a significant increase in the reflux could be confirmed. The findings after fundoplication showed a significant decrease in the fraction of time that the pH fell below four and an increase in the vector volume compared with the measurement after myotomy. Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication were highly effective, whereas measurements after anterior fundoplication still showed increased fraction times. Pharmacologic stimulation with pentagastrin showed an increase in the vector volume of the esophageal sphincter. Conclusions Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication are potent operations for the treatment of GERD. Anterior hemifundoplication reduces the reflux as well, but the effects are significantly less than with total and posterior fundoplication. Pharmacologic stimulation showed excellent results after posterior hemifundoplication, and a tendency to overcorrection was shown after total fundoplication. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Laparoscopic fundoplication |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Gastroesophageal reflux |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Nissen |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Toupet |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Experimental model |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wachowiak, R. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rempf, C. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vashist, Y. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mann, O. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yekebas, E. F. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Izbicki, J. R. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gawad, K. A. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Surgical endoscopy and other interventional techniques |d New York, NY : Springer, 1987 |g 25(2011), 10 vom: 14. Mai, Seite 3235-3244 |w (DE-627)254909620 |w (DE-600)1463171-4 |x 1432-2218 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2011 |g number:10 |g day:14 |g month:05 |g pages:3235-3244 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1699-9 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_101 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_138 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_171 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_250 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_267 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_281 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_636 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_711 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2031 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2057 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2070 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2086 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2093 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2106 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2107 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2108 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2116 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2119 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2144 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2188 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2446 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2472 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2548 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4246 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4328 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4336 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.87 |q ASE |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 25 |j 2011 |e 10 |b 14 |c 05 |h 3235-3244 | ||
| author_variant |
k b kb r w rw c r cr y v yv o m om e f y ef efy j r i jr jri k a g ka kag |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:14322218:2011----::soptudpiainhpoeuefhieotetngsreohgarfudsaeeutoarsetvrnoieeprmnatiloprn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2011 |
| bklnumber |
44.87 |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s00464-011-1699-9 doi (DE-627)SPR006286763 (SPR)s00464-011-1699-9-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 ASE 610 ASE 44.87 bkl Bachmann, K. verfasserin aut Is Toupet fundoplication the procedure of choice for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease? Results of a prospective randomized experimental trial comparing three major antireflux operations in a porcine model 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is among the most common dysfunctions of the upper gastrointestinal tract. It interferes with quality of life and is a risk factor for the development of adenocarcinoma in the lower esophagus. Laparoscopic fundoplication is an effective treatment of GERD, but the physiologic mechanisms of the different available procedures had not been investigated to date. Methods In this study, 28 German Landrace pigs underwent baseline manometry and 24-h pH monitoring followed by myotomy to induce reflux esophagitis. After new-onset reflux was proved, the pigs were randomized to groups based on four treatments: total fundoplication, anterior hemifundoplication, posterior hemifundoplication, and control. On days 10 and 60 after the intervention, the effectiveness of the different fundoplication modifications was compared with that of the control subjects by 24-h pH monitoring manometry. Finally, the pigs were killed, after which the minimum volume and pressure required to breach the gastroesophageal junction were recorded. Results After myotomy, a significant increase in the reflux could be confirmed. The findings after fundoplication showed a significant decrease in the fraction of time that the pH fell below four and an increase in the vector volume compared with the measurement after myotomy. Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication were highly effective, whereas measurements after anterior fundoplication still showed increased fraction times. Pharmacologic stimulation with pentagastrin showed an increase in the vector volume of the esophageal sphincter. Conclusions Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication are potent operations for the treatment of GERD. Anterior hemifundoplication reduces the reflux as well, but the effects are significantly less than with total and posterior fundoplication. Pharmacologic stimulation showed excellent results after posterior hemifundoplication, and a tendency to overcorrection was shown after total fundoplication. Laparoscopic fundoplication (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gastroesophageal reflux (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nissen (dpeaa)DE-He213 Toupet (dpeaa)DE-He213 Experimental model (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wachowiak, R. verfasserin aut Rempf, C. verfasserin aut Vashist, Y. verfasserin aut Mann, O. verfasserin aut Yekebas, E. F. verfasserin aut Izbicki, J. R. verfasserin aut Gawad, K. A. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Surgical endoscopy and other interventional techniques New York, NY : Springer, 1987 25(2011), 10 vom: 14. Mai, Seite 3235-3244 (DE-627)254909620 (DE-600)1463171-4 1432-2218 nnns volume:25 year:2011 number:10 day:14 month:05 pages:3235-3244 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1699-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.87 ASE AR 25 2011 10 14 05 3235-3244 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s00464-011-1699-9 doi (DE-627)SPR006286763 (SPR)s00464-011-1699-9-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 ASE 610 ASE 44.87 bkl Bachmann, K. verfasserin aut Is Toupet fundoplication the procedure of choice for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease? Results of a prospective randomized experimental trial comparing three major antireflux operations in a porcine model 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is among the most common dysfunctions of the upper gastrointestinal tract. It interferes with quality of life and is a risk factor for the development of adenocarcinoma in the lower esophagus. Laparoscopic fundoplication is an effective treatment of GERD, but the physiologic mechanisms of the different available procedures had not been investigated to date. Methods In this study, 28 German Landrace pigs underwent baseline manometry and 24-h pH monitoring followed by myotomy to induce reflux esophagitis. After new-onset reflux was proved, the pigs were randomized to groups based on four treatments: total fundoplication, anterior hemifundoplication, posterior hemifundoplication, and control. On days 10 and 60 after the intervention, the effectiveness of the different fundoplication modifications was compared with that of the control subjects by 24-h pH monitoring manometry. Finally, the pigs were killed, after which the minimum volume and pressure required to breach the gastroesophageal junction were recorded. Results After myotomy, a significant increase in the reflux could be confirmed. The findings after fundoplication showed a significant decrease in the fraction of time that the pH fell below four and an increase in the vector volume compared with the measurement after myotomy. Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication were highly effective, whereas measurements after anterior fundoplication still showed increased fraction times. Pharmacologic stimulation with pentagastrin showed an increase in the vector volume of the esophageal sphincter. Conclusions Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication are potent operations for the treatment of GERD. Anterior hemifundoplication reduces the reflux as well, but the effects are significantly less than with total and posterior fundoplication. Pharmacologic stimulation showed excellent results after posterior hemifundoplication, and a tendency to overcorrection was shown after total fundoplication. Laparoscopic fundoplication (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gastroesophageal reflux (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nissen (dpeaa)DE-He213 Toupet (dpeaa)DE-He213 Experimental model (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wachowiak, R. verfasserin aut Rempf, C. verfasserin aut Vashist, Y. verfasserin aut Mann, O. verfasserin aut Yekebas, E. F. verfasserin aut Izbicki, J. R. verfasserin aut Gawad, K. A. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Surgical endoscopy and other interventional techniques New York, NY : Springer, 1987 25(2011), 10 vom: 14. Mai, Seite 3235-3244 (DE-627)254909620 (DE-600)1463171-4 1432-2218 nnns volume:25 year:2011 number:10 day:14 month:05 pages:3235-3244 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1699-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.87 ASE AR 25 2011 10 14 05 3235-3244 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s00464-011-1699-9 doi (DE-627)SPR006286763 (SPR)s00464-011-1699-9-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 ASE 610 ASE 44.87 bkl Bachmann, K. verfasserin aut Is Toupet fundoplication the procedure of choice for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease? Results of a prospective randomized experimental trial comparing three major antireflux operations in a porcine model 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is among the most common dysfunctions of the upper gastrointestinal tract. It interferes with quality of life and is a risk factor for the development of adenocarcinoma in the lower esophagus. Laparoscopic fundoplication is an effective treatment of GERD, but the physiologic mechanisms of the different available procedures had not been investigated to date. Methods In this study, 28 German Landrace pigs underwent baseline manometry and 24-h pH monitoring followed by myotomy to induce reflux esophagitis. After new-onset reflux was proved, the pigs were randomized to groups based on four treatments: total fundoplication, anterior hemifundoplication, posterior hemifundoplication, and control. On days 10 and 60 after the intervention, the effectiveness of the different fundoplication modifications was compared with that of the control subjects by 24-h pH monitoring manometry. Finally, the pigs were killed, after which the minimum volume and pressure required to breach the gastroesophageal junction were recorded. Results After myotomy, a significant increase in the reflux could be confirmed. The findings after fundoplication showed a significant decrease in the fraction of time that the pH fell below four and an increase in the vector volume compared with the measurement after myotomy. Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication were highly effective, whereas measurements after anterior fundoplication still showed increased fraction times. Pharmacologic stimulation with pentagastrin showed an increase in the vector volume of the esophageal sphincter. Conclusions Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication are potent operations for the treatment of GERD. Anterior hemifundoplication reduces the reflux as well, but the effects are significantly less than with total and posterior fundoplication. Pharmacologic stimulation showed excellent results after posterior hemifundoplication, and a tendency to overcorrection was shown after total fundoplication. Laparoscopic fundoplication (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gastroesophageal reflux (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nissen (dpeaa)DE-He213 Toupet (dpeaa)DE-He213 Experimental model (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wachowiak, R. verfasserin aut Rempf, C. verfasserin aut Vashist, Y. verfasserin aut Mann, O. verfasserin aut Yekebas, E. F. verfasserin aut Izbicki, J. R. verfasserin aut Gawad, K. A. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Surgical endoscopy and other interventional techniques New York, NY : Springer, 1987 25(2011), 10 vom: 14. Mai, Seite 3235-3244 (DE-627)254909620 (DE-600)1463171-4 1432-2218 nnns volume:25 year:2011 number:10 day:14 month:05 pages:3235-3244 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1699-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.87 ASE AR 25 2011 10 14 05 3235-3244 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s00464-011-1699-9 doi (DE-627)SPR006286763 (SPR)s00464-011-1699-9-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 ASE 610 ASE 44.87 bkl Bachmann, K. verfasserin aut Is Toupet fundoplication the procedure of choice for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease? Results of a prospective randomized experimental trial comparing three major antireflux operations in a porcine model 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is among the most common dysfunctions of the upper gastrointestinal tract. It interferes with quality of life and is a risk factor for the development of adenocarcinoma in the lower esophagus. Laparoscopic fundoplication is an effective treatment of GERD, but the physiologic mechanisms of the different available procedures had not been investigated to date. Methods In this study, 28 German Landrace pigs underwent baseline manometry and 24-h pH monitoring followed by myotomy to induce reflux esophagitis. After new-onset reflux was proved, the pigs were randomized to groups based on four treatments: total fundoplication, anterior hemifundoplication, posterior hemifundoplication, and control. On days 10 and 60 after the intervention, the effectiveness of the different fundoplication modifications was compared with that of the control subjects by 24-h pH monitoring manometry. Finally, the pigs were killed, after which the minimum volume and pressure required to breach the gastroesophageal junction were recorded. Results After myotomy, a significant increase in the reflux could be confirmed. The findings after fundoplication showed a significant decrease in the fraction of time that the pH fell below four and an increase in the vector volume compared with the measurement after myotomy. Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication were highly effective, whereas measurements after anterior fundoplication still showed increased fraction times. Pharmacologic stimulation with pentagastrin showed an increase in the vector volume of the esophageal sphincter. Conclusions Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication are potent operations for the treatment of GERD. Anterior hemifundoplication reduces the reflux as well, but the effects are significantly less than with total and posterior fundoplication. Pharmacologic stimulation showed excellent results after posterior hemifundoplication, and a tendency to overcorrection was shown after total fundoplication. Laparoscopic fundoplication (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gastroesophageal reflux (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nissen (dpeaa)DE-He213 Toupet (dpeaa)DE-He213 Experimental model (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wachowiak, R. verfasserin aut Rempf, C. verfasserin aut Vashist, Y. verfasserin aut Mann, O. verfasserin aut Yekebas, E. F. verfasserin aut Izbicki, J. R. verfasserin aut Gawad, K. A. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Surgical endoscopy and other interventional techniques New York, NY : Springer, 1987 25(2011), 10 vom: 14. Mai, Seite 3235-3244 (DE-627)254909620 (DE-600)1463171-4 1432-2218 nnns volume:25 year:2011 number:10 day:14 month:05 pages:3235-3244 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1699-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.87 ASE AR 25 2011 10 14 05 3235-3244 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s00464-011-1699-9 doi (DE-627)SPR006286763 (SPR)s00464-011-1699-9-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 ASE 610 ASE 44.87 bkl Bachmann, K. verfasserin aut Is Toupet fundoplication the procedure of choice for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease? Results of a prospective randomized experimental trial comparing three major antireflux operations in a porcine model 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is among the most common dysfunctions of the upper gastrointestinal tract. It interferes with quality of life and is a risk factor for the development of adenocarcinoma in the lower esophagus. Laparoscopic fundoplication is an effective treatment of GERD, but the physiologic mechanisms of the different available procedures had not been investigated to date. Methods In this study, 28 German Landrace pigs underwent baseline manometry and 24-h pH monitoring followed by myotomy to induce reflux esophagitis. After new-onset reflux was proved, the pigs were randomized to groups based on four treatments: total fundoplication, anterior hemifundoplication, posterior hemifundoplication, and control. On days 10 and 60 after the intervention, the effectiveness of the different fundoplication modifications was compared with that of the control subjects by 24-h pH monitoring manometry. Finally, the pigs were killed, after which the minimum volume and pressure required to breach the gastroesophageal junction were recorded. Results After myotomy, a significant increase in the reflux could be confirmed. The findings after fundoplication showed a significant decrease in the fraction of time that the pH fell below four and an increase in the vector volume compared with the measurement after myotomy. Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication were highly effective, whereas measurements after anterior fundoplication still showed increased fraction times. Pharmacologic stimulation with pentagastrin showed an increase in the vector volume of the esophageal sphincter. Conclusions Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication are potent operations for the treatment of GERD. Anterior hemifundoplication reduces the reflux as well, but the effects are significantly less than with total and posterior fundoplication. Pharmacologic stimulation showed excellent results after posterior hemifundoplication, and a tendency to overcorrection was shown after total fundoplication. Laparoscopic fundoplication (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gastroesophageal reflux (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nissen (dpeaa)DE-He213 Toupet (dpeaa)DE-He213 Experimental model (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wachowiak, R. verfasserin aut Rempf, C. verfasserin aut Vashist, Y. verfasserin aut Mann, O. verfasserin aut Yekebas, E. F. verfasserin aut Izbicki, J. R. verfasserin aut Gawad, K. A. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Surgical endoscopy and other interventional techniques New York, NY : Springer, 1987 25(2011), 10 vom: 14. Mai, Seite 3235-3244 (DE-627)254909620 (DE-600)1463171-4 1432-2218 nnns volume:25 year:2011 number:10 day:14 month:05 pages:3235-3244 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1699-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.87 ASE AR 25 2011 10 14 05 3235-3244 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Surgical endoscopy and other interventional techniques 25(2011), 10 vom: 14. Mai, Seite 3235-3244 volume:25 year:2011 number:10 day:14 month:05 pages:3235-3244 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Surgical endoscopy and other interventional techniques 25(2011), 10 vom: 14. Mai, Seite 3235-3244 volume:25 year:2011 number:10 day:14 month:05 pages:3235-3244 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Laparoscopic fundoplication Gastroesophageal reflux Nissen Toupet Experimental model |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Surgical endoscopy and other interventional techniques |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Bachmann, K. @@aut@@ Wachowiak, R. @@aut@@ Rempf, C. @@aut@@ Vashist, Y. @@aut@@ Mann, O. @@aut@@ Yekebas, E. F. @@aut@@ Izbicki, J. R. @@aut@@ Gawad, K. A. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2011-05-14T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
254909620 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
SPR006286763 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR006286763</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519093841.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201002s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00464-011-1699-9</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR006286763</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00464-011-1699-9-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.87</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bachmann, K.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Is Toupet fundoplication the procedure of choice for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease? Results of a prospective randomized experimental trial comparing three major antireflux operations in a porcine model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is among the most common dysfunctions of the upper gastrointestinal tract. It interferes with quality of life and is a risk factor for the development of adenocarcinoma in the lower esophagus. Laparoscopic fundoplication is an effective treatment of GERD, but the physiologic mechanisms of the different available procedures had not been investigated to date. Methods In this study, 28 German Landrace pigs underwent baseline manometry and 24-h pH monitoring followed by myotomy to induce reflux esophagitis. After new-onset reflux was proved, the pigs were randomized to groups based on four treatments: total fundoplication, anterior hemifundoplication, posterior hemifundoplication, and control. On days 10 and 60 after the intervention, the effectiveness of the different fundoplication modifications was compared with that of the control subjects by 24-h pH monitoring manometry. Finally, the pigs were killed, after which the minimum volume and pressure required to breach the gastroesophageal junction were recorded. Results After myotomy, a significant increase in the reflux could be confirmed. The findings after fundoplication showed a significant decrease in the fraction of time that the pH fell below four and an increase in the vector volume compared with the measurement after myotomy. Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication were highly effective, whereas measurements after anterior fundoplication still showed increased fraction times. Pharmacologic stimulation with pentagastrin showed an increase in the vector volume of the esophageal sphincter. Conclusions Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication are potent operations for the treatment of GERD. Anterior hemifundoplication reduces the reflux as well, but the effects are significantly less than with total and posterior fundoplication. Pharmacologic stimulation showed excellent results after posterior hemifundoplication, and a tendency to overcorrection was shown after total fundoplication.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Laparoscopic fundoplication</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gastroesophageal reflux</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nissen</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Toupet</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Experimental model</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wachowiak, R.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rempf, C.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vashist, Y.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mann, O.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yekebas, E. F.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Izbicki, J. R.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gawad, K. A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Surgical endoscopy and other interventional techniques</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Springer, 1987</subfield><subfield code="g">25(2011), 10 vom: 14. Mai, Seite 3235-3244</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)254909620</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1463171-4</subfield><subfield code="x">1432-2218</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">number:10</subfield><subfield code="g">day:14</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:3235-3244</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1699-9</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_711</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2070</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.87</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="e">10</subfield><subfield code="b">14</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">3235-3244</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Bachmann, K. |
| spellingShingle |
Bachmann, K. ddc 610 bkl 44.87 misc Laparoscopic fundoplication misc Gastroesophageal reflux misc Nissen misc Toupet misc Experimental model Is Toupet fundoplication the procedure of choice for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease? Results of a prospective randomized experimental trial comparing three major antireflux operations in a porcine model |
| authorStr |
Bachmann, K. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)254909620 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1432-2218 |
| topic_title |
610 ASE 44.87 bkl Is Toupet fundoplication the procedure of choice for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease? Results of a prospective randomized experimental trial comparing three major antireflux operations in a porcine model Laparoscopic fundoplication (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gastroesophageal reflux (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nissen (dpeaa)DE-He213 Toupet (dpeaa)DE-He213 Experimental model (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
ddc 610 bkl 44.87 misc Laparoscopic fundoplication misc Gastroesophageal reflux misc Nissen misc Toupet misc Experimental model |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 bkl 44.87 misc Laparoscopic fundoplication misc Gastroesophageal reflux misc Nissen misc Toupet misc Experimental model |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 bkl 44.87 misc Laparoscopic fundoplication misc Gastroesophageal reflux misc Nissen misc Toupet misc Experimental model |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Surgical endoscopy and other interventional techniques |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
254909620 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Surgical endoscopy and other interventional techniques |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)254909620 (DE-600)1463171-4 |
| title |
Is Toupet fundoplication the procedure of choice for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease? Results of a prospective randomized experimental trial comparing three major antireflux operations in a porcine model |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR006286763 (SPR)s00464-011-1699-9-e |
| title_full |
Is Toupet fundoplication the procedure of choice for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease? Results of a prospective randomized experimental trial comparing three major antireflux operations in a porcine model |
| author_sort |
Bachmann, K. |
| journal |
Surgical endoscopy and other interventional techniques |
| journalStr |
Surgical endoscopy and other interventional techniques |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2011 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
3235 |
| author_browse |
Bachmann, K. Wachowiak, R. Rempf, C. Vashist, Y. Mann, O. Yekebas, E. F. Izbicki, J. R. Gawad, K. A. |
| container_volume |
25 |
| class |
610 ASE 44.87 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Bachmann, K. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s00464-011-1699-9 |
| dewey-full |
610 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
is toupet fundoplication the procedure of choice for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease? results of a prospective randomized experimental trial comparing three major antireflux operations in a porcine model |
| title_auth |
Is Toupet fundoplication the procedure of choice for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease? Results of a prospective randomized experimental trial comparing three major antireflux operations in a porcine model |
| abstract |
Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is among the most common dysfunctions of the upper gastrointestinal tract. It interferes with quality of life and is a risk factor for the development of adenocarcinoma in the lower esophagus. Laparoscopic fundoplication is an effective treatment of GERD, but the physiologic mechanisms of the different available procedures had not been investigated to date. Methods In this study, 28 German Landrace pigs underwent baseline manometry and 24-h pH monitoring followed by myotomy to induce reflux esophagitis. After new-onset reflux was proved, the pigs were randomized to groups based on four treatments: total fundoplication, anterior hemifundoplication, posterior hemifundoplication, and control. On days 10 and 60 after the intervention, the effectiveness of the different fundoplication modifications was compared with that of the control subjects by 24-h pH monitoring manometry. Finally, the pigs were killed, after which the minimum volume and pressure required to breach the gastroesophageal junction were recorded. Results After myotomy, a significant increase in the reflux could be confirmed. The findings after fundoplication showed a significant decrease in the fraction of time that the pH fell below four and an increase in the vector volume compared with the measurement after myotomy. Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication were highly effective, whereas measurements after anterior fundoplication still showed increased fraction times. Pharmacologic stimulation with pentagastrin showed an increase in the vector volume of the esophageal sphincter. Conclusions Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication are potent operations for the treatment of GERD. Anterior hemifundoplication reduces the reflux as well, but the effects are significantly less than with total and posterior fundoplication. Pharmacologic stimulation showed excellent results after posterior hemifundoplication, and a tendency to overcorrection was shown after total fundoplication. |
| abstractGer |
Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is among the most common dysfunctions of the upper gastrointestinal tract. It interferes with quality of life and is a risk factor for the development of adenocarcinoma in the lower esophagus. Laparoscopic fundoplication is an effective treatment of GERD, but the physiologic mechanisms of the different available procedures had not been investigated to date. Methods In this study, 28 German Landrace pigs underwent baseline manometry and 24-h pH monitoring followed by myotomy to induce reflux esophagitis. After new-onset reflux was proved, the pigs were randomized to groups based on four treatments: total fundoplication, anterior hemifundoplication, posterior hemifundoplication, and control. On days 10 and 60 after the intervention, the effectiveness of the different fundoplication modifications was compared with that of the control subjects by 24-h pH monitoring manometry. Finally, the pigs were killed, after which the minimum volume and pressure required to breach the gastroesophageal junction were recorded. Results After myotomy, a significant increase in the reflux could be confirmed. The findings after fundoplication showed a significant decrease in the fraction of time that the pH fell below four and an increase in the vector volume compared with the measurement after myotomy. Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication were highly effective, whereas measurements after anterior fundoplication still showed increased fraction times. Pharmacologic stimulation with pentagastrin showed an increase in the vector volume of the esophageal sphincter. Conclusions Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication are potent operations for the treatment of GERD. Anterior hemifundoplication reduces the reflux as well, but the effects are significantly less than with total and posterior fundoplication. Pharmacologic stimulation showed excellent results after posterior hemifundoplication, and a tendency to overcorrection was shown after total fundoplication. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is among the most common dysfunctions of the upper gastrointestinal tract. It interferes with quality of life and is a risk factor for the development of adenocarcinoma in the lower esophagus. Laparoscopic fundoplication is an effective treatment of GERD, but the physiologic mechanisms of the different available procedures had not been investigated to date. Methods In this study, 28 German Landrace pigs underwent baseline manometry and 24-h pH monitoring followed by myotomy to induce reflux esophagitis. After new-onset reflux was proved, the pigs were randomized to groups based on four treatments: total fundoplication, anterior hemifundoplication, posterior hemifundoplication, and control. On days 10 and 60 after the intervention, the effectiveness of the different fundoplication modifications was compared with that of the control subjects by 24-h pH monitoring manometry. Finally, the pigs were killed, after which the minimum volume and pressure required to breach the gastroesophageal junction were recorded. Results After myotomy, a significant increase in the reflux could be confirmed. The findings after fundoplication showed a significant decrease in the fraction of time that the pH fell below four and an increase in the vector volume compared with the measurement after myotomy. Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication were highly effective, whereas measurements after anterior fundoplication still showed increased fraction times. Pharmacologic stimulation with pentagastrin showed an increase in the vector volume of the esophageal sphincter. Conclusions Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication are potent operations for the treatment of GERD. Anterior hemifundoplication reduces the reflux as well, but the effects are significantly less than with total and posterior fundoplication. Pharmacologic stimulation showed excellent results after posterior hemifundoplication, and a tendency to overcorrection was shown after total fundoplication. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 |
| container_issue |
10 |
| title_short |
Is Toupet fundoplication the procedure of choice for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease? Results of a prospective randomized experimental trial comparing three major antireflux operations in a porcine model |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1699-9 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Wachowiak, R. Rempf, C. Vashist, Y. Mann, O. Yekebas, E. F. Izbicki, J. R. Gawad, K. A. |
| author2Str |
Wachowiak, R. Rempf, C. Vashist, Y. Mann, O. Yekebas, E. F. Izbicki, J. R. Gawad, K. A. |
| ppnlink |
254909620 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s00464-011-1699-9 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T22:02:40.474Z |
| _version_ |
1803597025616330752 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR006286763</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519093841.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201002s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00464-011-1699-9</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR006286763</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00464-011-1699-9-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.87</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bachmann, K.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Is Toupet fundoplication the procedure of choice for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease? Results of a prospective randomized experimental trial comparing three major antireflux operations in a porcine model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is among the most common dysfunctions of the upper gastrointestinal tract. It interferes with quality of life and is a risk factor for the development of adenocarcinoma in the lower esophagus. Laparoscopic fundoplication is an effective treatment of GERD, but the physiologic mechanisms of the different available procedures had not been investigated to date. Methods In this study, 28 German Landrace pigs underwent baseline manometry and 24-h pH monitoring followed by myotomy to induce reflux esophagitis. After new-onset reflux was proved, the pigs were randomized to groups based on four treatments: total fundoplication, anterior hemifundoplication, posterior hemifundoplication, and control. On days 10 and 60 after the intervention, the effectiveness of the different fundoplication modifications was compared with that of the control subjects by 24-h pH monitoring manometry. Finally, the pigs were killed, after which the minimum volume and pressure required to breach the gastroesophageal junction were recorded. Results After myotomy, a significant increase in the reflux could be confirmed. The findings after fundoplication showed a significant decrease in the fraction of time that the pH fell below four and an increase in the vector volume compared with the measurement after myotomy. Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication were highly effective, whereas measurements after anterior fundoplication still showed increased fraction times. Pharmacologic stimulation with pentagastrin showed an increase in the vector volume of the esophageal sphincter. Conclusions Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication are potent operations for the treatment of GERD. Anterior hemifundoplication reduces the reflux as well, but the effects are significantly less than with total and posterior fundoplication. Pharmacologic stimulation showed excellent results after posterior hemifundoplication, and a tendency to overcorrection was shown after total fundoplication.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Laparoscopic fundoplication</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gastroesophageal reflux</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nissen</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Toupet</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Experimental model</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wachowiak, R.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rempf, C.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vashist, Y.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mann, O.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yekebas, E. F.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Izbicki, J. R.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gawad, K. A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Surgical endoscopy and other interventional techniques</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Springer, 1987</subfield><subfield code="g">25(2011), 10 vom: 14. Mai, Seite 3235-3244</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)254909620</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1463171-4</subfield><subfield code="x">1432-2218</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">number:10</subfield><subfield code="g">day:14</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:3235-3244</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1699-9</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_711</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2070</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.87</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="e">10</subfield><subfield code="b">14</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">3235-3244</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399436 |