Estimated prevalence of halitosis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis
Objective This study aims to conduct a systematic review to determine the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults. Methods Electronic searches were performed using four different databases without restrictions: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO. Population-based observational stud...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Silva, Manuela F. [verfasserIn] Leite, Fábio R. M. [verfasserIn] Ferreira, Larissa B. [verfasserIn] Pola, Natália M. [verfasserIn] Scannapieco, Frank A. [verfasserIn] Demarco, Flávio F. [verfasserIn] Nascimento, Gustavo G. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Clinical Oral Investigations - Springer-Verlag, 2001, 22(2017), 1 vom: 04. Juli, Seite 47-55 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:22 ; year:2017 ; number:1 ; day:04 ; month:07 ; pages:47-55 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s00784-017-2164-5 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR007819447 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR007819447 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20201124022407.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201005s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00784-017-2164-5 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR007819447 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s00784-017-2164-5-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Silva, Manuela F. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Estimated prevalence of halitosis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Objective This study aims to conduct a systematic review to determine the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults. Methods Electronic searches were performed using four different databases without restrictions: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO. Population-based observational studies that provided data about the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults were included. Additionally, meta-analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to synthesize the evidence. Results A total of 584 articles were initially found and considered for title and abstract evaluation. Thirteen articles met inclusion criteria. The combined prevalence of halitosis was found to be 31.8% (95% CI 24.6–39.0%). Methodological aspects such as the year of publication and the socioeconomic status of the country where the study was conducted seemed to influence the prevalence of halitosis. Conclusions Our results demonstrated that the estimated prevalence of halitosis was 31.8%, with high heterogeneity between studies. The results suggest a worldwide trend towards a rise in halitosis prevalence. Clinical relevance Given the high prevalence of halitosis and its complex etiology, dental professionals should be aware of their roles in halitosis prevention and treatment. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Oral malodor |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bad breath |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Prevalence |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Meta-analysis |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Leite, Fábio R. M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ferreira, Larissa B. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pola, Natália M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Scannapieco, Frank A. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Demarco, Flávio F. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nascimento, Gustavo G. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Clinical Oral Investigations |d Springer-Verlag, 2001 |g 22(2017), 1 vom: 04. Juli, Seite 47-55 |w (DE-627)SPR007794231 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g day:04 |g month:07 |g pages:47-55 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2164-5 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 22 |j 2017 |e 1 |b 04 |c 07 |h 47-55 | ||
| author_variant |
m f s mf mfs f r m l frm frml l b f lb lbf n m p nm nmp f a s fa fas f f d ff ffd g g n gg ggn |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
silvamanuelafleitefbiormferreiralarissab:2017----:siaepeaecohltsssseairveadea |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s00784-017-2164-5 doi (DE-627)SPR007819447 (SPR)s00784-017-2164-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Silva, Manuela F. verfasserin aut Estimated prevalence of halitosis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objective This study aims to conduct a systematic review to determine the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults. Methods Electronic searches were performed using four different databases without restrictions: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO. Population-based observational studies that provided data about the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults were included. Additionally, meta-analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to synthesize the evidence. Results A total of 584 articles were initially found and considered for title and abstract evaluation. Thirteen articles met inclusion criteria. The combined prevalence of halitosis was found to be 31.8% (95% CI 24.6–39.0%). Methodological aspects such as the year of publication and the socioeconomic status of the country where the study was conducted seemed to influence the prevalence of halitosis. Conclusions Our results demonstrated that the estimated prevalence of halitosis was 31.8%, with high heterogeneity between studies. The results suggest a worldwide trend towards a rise in halitosis prevalence. Clinical relevance Given the high prevalence of halitosis and its complex etiology, dental professionals should be aware of their roles in halitosis prevention and treatment. Oral malodor (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bad breath (dpeaa)DE-He213 Prevalence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Meta-analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Leite, Fábio R. M. verfasserin aut Ferreira, Larissa B. verfasserin aut Pola, Natália M. verfasserin aut Scannapieco, Frank A. verfasserin aut Demarco, Flávio F. verfasserin aut Nascimento, Gustavo G. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 22(2017), 1 vom: 04. Juli, Seite 47-55 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:22 year:2017 number:1 day:04 month:07 pages:47-55 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2164-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 2017 1 04 07 47-55 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s00784-017-2164-5 doi (DE-627)SPR007819447 (SPR)s00784-017-2164-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Silva, Manuela F. verfasserin aut Estimated prevalence of halitosis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objective This study aims to conduct a systematic review to determine the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults. Methods Electronic searches were performed using four different databases without restrictions: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO. Population-based observational studies that provided data about the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults were included. Additionally, meta-analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to synthesize the evidence. Results A total of 584 articles were initially found and considered for title and abstract evaluation. Thirteen articles met inclusion criteria. The combined prevalence of halitosis was found to be 31.8% (95% CI 24.6–39.0%). Methodological aspects such as the year of publication and the socioeconomic status of the country where the study was conducted seemed to influence the prevalence of halitosis. Conclusions Our results demonstrated that the estimated prevalence of halitosis was 31.8%, with high heterogeneity between studies. The results suggest a worldwide trend towards a rise in halitosis prevalence. Clinical relevance Given the high prevalence of halitosis and its complex etiology, dental professionals should be aware of their roles in halitosis prevention and treatment. Oral malodor (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bad breath (dpeaa)DE-He213 Prevalence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Meta-analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Leite, Fábio R. M. verfasserin aut Ferreira, Larissa B. verfasserin aut Pola, Natália M. verfasserin aut Scannapieco, Frank A. verfasserin aut Demarco, Flávio F. verfasserin aut Nascimento, Gustavo G. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 22(2017), 1 vom: 04. Juli, Seite 47-55 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:22 year:2017 number:1 day:04 month:07 pages:47-55 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2164-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 2017 1 04 07 47-55 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s00784-017-2164-5 doi (DE-627)SPR007819447 (SPR)s00784-017-2164-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Silva, Manuela F. verfasserin aut Estimated prevalence of halitosis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objective This study aims to conduct a systematic review to determine the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults. Methods Electronic searches were performed using four different databases without restrictions: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO. Population-based observational studies that provided data about the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults were included. Additionally, meta-analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to synthesize the evidence. Results A total of 584 articles were initially found and considered for title and abstract evaluation. Thirteen articles met inclusion criteria. The combined prevalence of halitosis was found to be 31.8% (95% CI 24.6–39.0%). Methodological aspects such as the year of publication and the socioeconomic status of the country where the study was conducted seemed to influence the prevalence of halitosis. Conclusions Our results demonstrated that the estimated prevalence of halitosis was 31.8%, with high heterogeneity between studies. The results suggest a worldwide trend towards a rise in halitosis prevalence. Clinical relevance Given the high prevalence of halitosis and its complex etiology, dental professionals should be aware of their roles in halitosis prevention and treatment. Oral malodor (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bad breath (dpeaa)DE-He213 Prevalence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Meta-analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Leite, Fábio R. M. verfasserin aut Ferreira, Larissa B. verfasserin aut Pola, Natália M. verfasserin aut Scannapieco, Frank A. verfasserin aut Demarco, Flávio F. verfasserin aut Nascimento, Gustavo G. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 22(2017), 1 vom: 04. Juli, Seite 47-55 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:22 year:2017 number:1 day:04 month:07 pages:47-55 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2164-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 2017 1 04 07 47-55 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s00784-017-2164-5 doi (DE-627)SPR007819447 (SPR)s00784-017-2164-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Silva, Manuela F. verfasserin aut Estimated prevalence of halitosis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objective This study aims to conduct a systematic review to determine the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults. Methods Electronic searches were performed using four different databases without restrictions: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO. Population-based observational studies that provided data about the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults were included. Additionally, meta-analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to synthesize the evidence. Results A total of 584 articles were initially found and considered for title and abstract evaluation. Thirteen articles met inclusion criteria. The combined prevalence of halitosis was found to be 31.8% (95% CI 24.6–39.0%). Methodological aspects such as the year of publication and the socioeconomic status of the country where the study was conducted seemed to influence the prevalence of halitosis. Conclusions Our results demonstrated that the estimated prevalence of halitosis was 31.8%, with high heterogeneity between studies. The results suggest a worldwide trend towards a rise in halitosis prevalence. Clinical relevance Given the high prevalence of halitosis and its complex etiology, dental professionals should be aware of their roles in halitosis prevention and treatment. Oral malodor (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bad breath (dpeaa)DE-He213 Prevalence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Meta-analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Leite, Fábio R. M. verfasserin aut Ferreira, Larissa B. verfasserin aut Pola, Natália M. verfasserin aut Scannapieco, Frank A. verfasserin aut Demarco, Flávio F. verfasserin aut Nascimento, Gustavo G. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 22(2017), 1 vom: 04. Juli, Seite 47-55 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:22 year:2017 number:1 day:04 month:07 pages:47-55 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2164-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 2017 1 04 07 47-55 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s00784-017-2164-5 doi (DE-627)SPR007819447 (SPR)s00784-017-2164-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Silva, Manuela F. verfasserin aut Estimated prevalence of halitosis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objective This study aims to conduct a systematic review to determine the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults. Methods Electronic searches were performed using four different databases without restrictions: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO. Population-based observational studies that provided data about the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults were included. Additionally, meta-analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to synthesize the evidence. Results A total of 584 articles were initially found and considered for title and abstract evaluation. Thirteen articles met inclusion criteria. The combined prevalence of halitosis was found to be 31.8% (95% CI 24.6–39.0%). Methodological aspects such as the year of publication and the socioeconomic status of the country where the study was conducted seemed to influence the prevalence of halitosis. Conclusions Our results demonstrated that the estimated prevalence of halitosis was 31.8%, with high heterogeneity between studies. The results suggest a worldwide trend towards a rise in halitosis prevalence. Clinical relevance Given the high prevalence of halitosis and its complex etiology, dental professionals should be aware of their roles in halitosis prevention and treatment. Oral malodor (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bad breath (dpeaa)DE-He213 Prevalence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Meta-analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Leite, Fábio R. M. verfasserin aut Ferreira, Larissa B. verfasserin aut Pola, Natália M. verfasserin aut Scannapieco, Frank A. verfasserin aut Demarco, Flávio F. verfasserin aut Nascimento, Gustavo G. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 22(2017), 1 vom: 04. Juli, Seite 47-55 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:22 year:2017 number:1 day:04 month:07 pages:47-55 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2164-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 2017 1 04 07 47-55 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations 22(2017), 1 vom: 04. Juli, Seite 47-55 volume:22 year:2017 number:1 day:04 month:07 pages:47-55 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations 22(2017), 1 vom: 04. Juli, Seite 47-55 volume:22 year:2017 number:1 day:04 month:07 pages:47-55 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Oral malodor Bad breath Prevalence Meta-analysis |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Silva, Manuela F. @@aut@@ Leite, Fábio R. M. @@aut@@ Ferreira, Larissa B. @@aut@@ Pola, Natália M. @@aut@@ Scannapieco, Frank A. @@aut@@ Demarco, Flávio F. @@aut@@ Nascimento, Gustavo G. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-07-04T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR007794231 |
| id |
SPR007819447 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR007819447</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20201124022407.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201005s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00784-017-2164-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR007819447</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00784-017-2164-5-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Silva, Manuela F.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Estimated prevalence of halitosis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objective This study aims to conduct a systematic review to determine the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults. Methods Electronic searches were performed using four different databases without restrictions: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO. Population-based observational studies that provided data about the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults were included. Additionally, meta-analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to synthesize the evidence. Results A total of 584 articles were initially found and considered for title and abstract evaluation. Thirteen articles met inclusion criteria. The combined prevalence of halitosis was found to be 31.8% (95% CI 24.6–39.0%). Methodological aspects such as the year of publication and the socioeconomic status of the country where the study was conducted seemed to influence the prevalence of halitosis. Conclusions Our results demonstrated that the estimated prevalence of halitosis was 31.8%, with high heterogeneity between studies. The results suggest a worldwide trend towards a rise in halitosis prevalence. Clinical relevance Given the high prevalence of halitosis and its complex etiology, dental professionals should be aware of their roles in halitosis prevention and treatment.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Oral malodor</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bad breath</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Prevalence</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Meta-analysis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Leite, Fábio R. M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ferreira, Larissa B.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pola, Natália M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Scannapieco, Frank A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Demarco, Flávio F.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nascimento, Gustavo G.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Clinical Oral Investigations</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">22(2017), 1 vom: 04. Juli, Seite 47-55</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR007794231</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:22</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:04</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:47-55</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2164-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">22</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">04</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield><subfield code="h">47-55</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Silva, Manuela F. |
| spellingShingle |
Silva, Manuela F. misc Oral malodor misc Bad breath misc Prevalence misc Meta-analysis Estimated prevalence of halitosis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis |
| authorStr |
Silva, Manuela F. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR007794231 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Estimated prevalence of halitosis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis Oral malodor (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bad breath (dpeaa)DE-He213 Prevalence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Meta-analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Oral malodor misc Bad breath misc Prevalence misc Meta-analysis |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Oral malodor misc Bad breath misc Prevalence misc Meta-analysis |
| topic_browse |
misc Oral malodor misc Bad breath misc Prevalence misc Meta-analysis |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR007794231 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR007794231 |
| title |
Estimated prevalence of halitosis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR007819447 (SPR)s00784-017-2164-5-e |
| title_full |
Estimated prevalence of halitosis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis |
| author_sort |
Silva, Manuela F. |
| journal |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| journalStr |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
47 |
| author_browse |
Silva, Manuela F. Leite, Fábio R. M. Ferreira, Larissa B. Pola, Natália M. Scannapieco, Frank A. Demarco, Flávio F. Nascimento, Gustavo G. |
| container_volume |
22 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Silva, Manuela F. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s00784-017-2164-5 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
estimated prevalence of halitosis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis |
| title_auth |
Estimated prevalence of halitosis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis |
| abstract |
Objective This study aims to conduct a systematic review to determine the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults. Methods Electronic searches were performed using four different databases without restrictions: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO. Population-based observational studies that provided data about the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults were included. Additionally, meta-analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to synthesize the evidence. Results A total of 584 articles were initially found and considered for title and abstract evaluation. Thirteen articles met inclusion criteria. The combined prevalence of halitosis was found to be 31.8% (95% CI 24.6–39.0%). Methodological aspects such as the year of publication and the socioeconomic status of the country where the study was conducted seemed to influence the prevalence of halitosis. Conclusions Our results demonstrated that the estimated prevalence of halitosis was 31.8%, with high heterogeneity between studies. The results suggest a worldwide trend towards a rise in halitosis prevalence. Clinical relevance Given the high prevalence of halitosis and its complex etiology, dental professionals should be aware of their roles in halitosis prevention and treatment. |
| abstractGer |
Objective This study aims to conduct a systematic review to determine the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults. Methods Electronic searches were performed using four different databases without restrictions: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO. Population-based observational studies that provided data about the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults were included. Additionally, meta-analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to synthesize the evidence. Results A total of 584 articles were initially found and considered for title and abstract evaluation. Thirteen articles met inclusion criteria. The combined prevalence of halitosis was found to be 31.8% (95% CI 24.6–39.0%). Methodological aspects such as the year of publication and the socioeconomic status of the country where the study was conducted seemed to influence the prevalence of halitosis. Conclusions Our results demonstrated that the estimated prevalence of halitosis was 31.8%, with high heterogeneity between studies. The results suggest a worldwide trend towards a rise in halitosis prevalence. Clinical relevance Given the high prevalence of halitosis and its complex etiology, dental professionals should be aware of their roles in halitosis prevention and treatment. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Objective This study aims to conduct a systematic review to determine the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults. Methods Electronic searches were performed using four different databases without restrictions: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO. Population-based observational studies that provided data about the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults were included. Additionally, meta-analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to synthesize the evidence. Results A total of 584 articles were initially found and considered for title and abstract evaluation. Thirteen articles met inclusion criteria. The combined prevalence of halitosis was found to be 31.8% (95% CI 24.6–39.0%). Methodological aspects such as the year of publication and the socioeconomic status of the country where the study was conducted seemed to influence the prevalence of halitosis. Conclusions Our results demonstrated that the estimated prevalence of halitosis was 31.8%, with high heterogeneity between studies. The results suggest a worldwide trend towards a rise in halitosis prevalence. Clinical relevance Given the high prevalence of halitosis and its complex etiology, dental professionals should be aware of their roles in halitosis prevention and treatment. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Estimated prevalence of halitosis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2164-5 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Leite, Fábio R. M. Ferreira, Larissa B. Pola, Natália M. Scannapieco, Frank A. Demarco, Flávio F. Nascimento, Gustavo G. |
| author2Str |
Leite, Fábio R. M. Ferreira, Larissa B. Pola, Natália M. Scannapieco, Frank A. Demarco, Flávio F. Nascimento, Gustavo G. |
| ppnlink |
SPR007794231 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s00784-017-2164-5 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T15:26:20.179Z |
| _version_ |
1803572090164477952 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR007819447</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20201124022407.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201005s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00784-017-2164-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR007819447</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00784-017-2164-5-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Silva, Manuela F.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Estimated prevalence of halitosis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objective This study aims to conduct a systematic review to determine the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults. Methods Electronic searches were performed using four different databases without restrictions: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO. Population-based observational studies that provided data about the prevalence of halitosis in adolescents and adults were included. Additionally, meta-analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to synthesize the evidence. Results A total of 584 articles were initially found and considered for title and abstract evaluation. Thirteen articles met inclusion criteria. The combined prevalence of halitosis was found to be 31.8% (95% CI 24.6–39.0%). Methodological aspects such as the year of publication and the socioeconomic status of the country where the study was conducted seemed to influence the prevalence of halitosis. Conclusions Our results demonstrated that the estimated prevalence of halitosis was 31.8%, with high heterogeneity between studies. The results suggest a worldwide trend towards a rise in halitosis prevalence. Clinical relevance Given the high prevalence of halitosis and its complex etiology, dental professionals should be aware of their roles in halitosis prevention and treatment.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Oral malodor</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bad breath</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Prevalence</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Meta-analysis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Leite, Fábio R. M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ferreira, Larissa B.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pola, Natália M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Scannapieco, Frank A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Demarco, Flávio F.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nascimento, Gustavo G.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Clinical Oral Investigations</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">22(2017), 1 vom: 04. Juli, Seite 47-55</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR007794231</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:22</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:04</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:47-55</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2164-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">22</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">04</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield><subfield code="h">47-55</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399288 |