Effectiveness of a new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric comparative study in minipigs
Objectives The objective of this study was to assess, by histomorphometric analysis, the degree of bone apposition on two types of dental implant’s surfaces: a novel implant that combines $ Al_{2} %$ O_{3} $ abrasive particle blasting with thermochemical treatment (ContacTi), compared to a standard...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Herrero-Climent, Mariano [verfasserIn] Romero Ruizª, Manuel M. [verfasserIn] Calvo, Pedro Lázaro [verfasserIn] Santos, José Vicente Ríos [verfasserIn] Perez, Roman A. [verfasserIn] Gil Mur, Francisco Javier [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Clinical Oral Investigations - Springer-Verlag, 2001, 22(2017), 3 vom: 12. Okt., Seite 1423-1432 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:22 ; year:2017 ; number:3 ; day:12 ; month:10 ; pages:1423-1432 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s00784-017-2223-y |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR007820437 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR007820437 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20201124022410.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201005s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00784-017-2223-y |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR007820437 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s00784-017-2223-y-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Herrero-Climent, Mariano |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effectiveness of a new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric comparative study in minipigs |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Objectives The objective of this study was to assess, by histomorphometric analysis, the degree of bone apposition on two types of dental implant’s surfaces: a novel implant that combines $ Al_{2} %$ O_{3} $ abrasive particle blasting with thermochemical treatment (ContacTi), compared to a standard surface treatment obtained by sandblasting and acid etching (shot blasting). Materials and methods Twelve minipigs were used, placing the studied implants in the maxillae, and divided into three groups according to the time of sacrifice: 2, 4, and 8 weeks after implant placement. Histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed following standardized tissue polymerization, cutting, and staining and examined under optical and high-resolution electron microscope. Results For all measurements, the novel surface presented higher levels of osseointegration as compared to the shot blasting surface. Bone to implant contact (BIC) in the maxillae for ContacTi presented values of 49.02, 83.20, and 85.58% at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, respectively, significantly higher compared to the shot blasting surface values of 39.32, 46.53, and 46.20% for the same time points. Bone area density (BAD) presented values of 26.52, 61.21, and 59.50% for ContacTi surface implants and 22.95, 36.26, and 49.50% for the shot blasted surface implants. Signs of osteoconductivity were observed in the ContacTi surfaces at 2 weeks. Conclusions The ContacTi surface achieved a faster growth of hard tissues around the implants, when compared to the shot blasting surface, and for all evaluated histomorphometric parameters, the values were higher at all measured time points. Clinical relevance ContacTi could be a new surface improving the osseointegration in oral implantology. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Dental implants |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bone histomorphometry |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Implant stability |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bone healing |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Shot blasting surface |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bioactivity |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Romero Ruizª, Manuel M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Calvo, Pedro Lázaro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Santos, José Vicente Ríos |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Perez, Roman A. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gil Mur, Francisco Javier |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Clinical Oral Investigations |d Springer-Verlag, 2001 |g 22(2017), 3 vom: 12. Okt., Seite 1423-1432 |w (DE-627)SPR007794231 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:2017 |g number:3 |g day:12 |g month:10 |g pages:1423-1432 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2223-y |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 22 |j 2017 |e 3 |b 12 |c 10 |h 1423-1432 | ||
| author_variant |
m h c mhc r m m r rmm rmmr p l c pl plc j v r s jvr jvrs r a p ra rap m f j g mfj mfjg |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
herreroclimentmarianoromeroruizmanuelmca:2017----:fetvnsoaednaipatiatvsraeitlgclnhsoopoer |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s00784-017-2223-y doi (DE-627)SPR007820437 (SPR)s00784-017-2223-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Herrero-Climent, Mariano verfasserin aut Effectiveness of a new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric comparative study in minipigs 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives The objective of this study was to assess, by histomorphometric analysis, the degree of bone apposition on two types of dental implant’s surfaces: a novel implant that combines $ Al_{2} %$ O_{3} $ abrasive particle blasting with thermochemical treatment (ContacTi), compared to a standard surface treatment obtained by sandblasting and acid etching (shot blasting). Materials and methods Twelve minipigs were used, placing the studied implants in the maxillae, and divided into three groups according to the time of sacrifice: 2, 4, and 8 weeks after implant placement. Histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed following standardized tissue polymerization, cutting, and staining and examined under optical and high-resolution electron microscope. Results For all measurements, the novel surface presented higher levels of osseointegration as compared to the shot blasting surface. Bone to implant contact (BIC) in the maxillae for ContacTi presented values of 49.02, 83.20, and 85.58% at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, respectively, significantly higher compared to the shot blasting surface values of 39.32, 46.53, and 46.20% for the same time points. Bone area density (BAD) presented values of 26.52, 61.21, and 59.50% for ContacTi surface implants and 22.95, 36.26, and 49.50% for the shot blasted surface implants. Signs of osteoconductivity were observed in the ContacTi surfaces at 2 weeks. Conclusions The ContacTi surface achieved a faster growth of hard tissues around the implants, when compared to the shot blasting surface, and for all evaluated histomorphometric parameters, the values were higher at all measured time points. Clinical relevance ContacTi could be a new surface improving the osseointegration in oral implantology. Dental implants (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bone histomorphometry (dpeaa)DE-He213 Implant stability (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bone healing (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shot blasting surface (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bioactivity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Romero Ruizª, Manuel M. verfasserin aut Calvo, Pedro Lázaro verfasserin aut Santos, José Vicente Ríos verfasserin aut Perez, Roman A. verfasserin aut Gil Mur, Francisco Javier verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 22(2017), 3 vom: 12. Okt., Seite 1423-1432 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:22 year:2017 number:3 day:12 month:10 pages:1423-1432 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2223-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 2017 3 12 10 1423-1432 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s00784-017-2223-y doi (DE-627)SPR007820437 (SPR)s00784-017-2223-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Herrero-Climent, Mariano verfasserin aut Effectiveness of a new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric comparative study in minipigs 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives The objective of this study was to assess, by histomorphometric analysis, the degree of bone apposition on two types of dental implant’s surfaces: a novel implant that combines $ Al_{2} %$ O_{3} $ abrasive particle blasting with thermochemical treatment (ContacTi), compared to a standard surface treatment obtained by sandblasting and acid etching (shot blasting). Materials and methods Twelve minipigs were used, placing the studied implants in the maxillae, and divided into three groups according to the time of sacrifice: 2, 4, and 8 weeks after implant placement. Histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed following standardized tissue polymerization, cutting, and staining and examined under optical and high-resolution electron microscope. Results For all measurements, the novel surface presented higher levels of osseointegration as compared to the shot blasting surface. Bone to implant contact (BIC) in the maxillae for ContacTi presented values of 49.02, 83.20, and 85.58% at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, respectively, significantly higher compared to the shot blasting surface values of 39.32, 46.53, and 46.20% for the same time points. Bone area density (BAD) presented values of 26.52, 61.21, and 59.50% for ContacTi surface implants and 22.95, 36.26, and 49.50% for the shot blasted surface implants. Signs of osteoconductivity were observed in the ContacTi surfaces at 2 weeks. Conclusions The ContacTi surface achieved a faster growth of hard tissues around the implants, when compared to the shot blasting surface, and for all evaluated histomorphometric parameters, the values were higher at all measured time points. Clinical relevance ContacTi could be a new surface improving the osseointegration in oral implantology. Dental implants (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bone histomorphometry (dpeaa)DE-He213 Implant stability (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bone healing (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shot blasting surface (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bioactivity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Romero Ruizª, Manuel M. verfasserin aut Calvo, Pedro Lázaro verfasserin aut Santos, José Vicente Ríos verfasserin aut Perez, Roman A. verfasserin aut Gil Mur, Francisco Javier verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 22(2017), 3 vom: 12. Okt., Seite 1423-1432 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:22 year:2017 number:3 day:12 month:10 pages:1423-1432 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2223-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 2017 3 12 10 1423-1432 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s00784-017-2223-y doi (DE-627)SPR007820437 (SPR)s00784-017-2223-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Herrero-Climent, Mariano verfasserin aut Effectiveness of a new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric comparative study in minipigs 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives The objective of this study was to assess, by histomorphometric analysis, the degree of bone apposition on two types of dental implant’s surfaces: a novel implant that combines $ Al_{2} %$ O_{3} $ abrasive particle blasting with thermochemical treatment (ContacTi), compared to a standard surface treatment obtained by sandblasting and acid etching (shot blasting). Materials and methods Twelve minipigs were used, placing the studied implants in the maxillae, and divided into three groups according to the time of sacrifice: 2, 4, and 8 weeks after implant placement. Histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed following standardized tissue polymerization, cutting, and staining and examined under optical and high-resolution electron microscope. Results For all measurements, the novel surface presented higher levels of osseointegration as compared to the shot blasting surface. Bone to implant contact (BIC) in the maxillae for ContacTi presented values of 49.02, 83.20, and 85.58% at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, respectively, significantly higher compared to the shot blasting surface values of 39.32, 46.53, and 46.20% for the same time points. Bone area density (BAD) presented values of 26.52, 61.21, and 59.50% for ContacTi surface implants and 22.95, 36.26, and 49.50% for the shot blasted surface implants. Signs of osteoconductivity were observed in the ContacTi surfaces at 2 weeks. Conclusions The ContacTi surface achieved a faster growth of hard tissues around the implants, when compared to the shot blasting surface, and for all evaluated histomorphometric parameters, the values were higher at all measured time points. Clinical relevance ContacTi could be a new surface improving the osseointegration in oral implantology. Dental implants (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bone histomorphometry (dpeaa)DE-He213 Implant stability (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bone healing (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shot blasting surface (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bioactivity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Romero Ruizª, Manuel M. verfasserin aut Calvo, Pedro Lázaro verfasserin aut Santos, José Vicente Ríos verfasserin aut Perez, Roman A. verfasserin aut Gil Mur, Francisco Javier verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 22(2017), 3 vom: 12. Okt., Seite 1423-1432 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:22 year:2017 number:3 day:12 month:10 pages:1423-1432 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2223-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 2017 3 12 10 1423-1432 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s00784-017-2223-y doi (DE-627)SPR007820437 (SPR)s00784-017-2223-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Herrero-Climent, Mariano verfasserin aut Effectiveness of a new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric comparative study in minipigs 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives The objective of this study was to assess, by histomorphometric analysis, the degree of bone apposition on two types of dental implant’s surfaces: a novel implant that combines $ Al_{2} %$ O_{3} $ abrasive particle blasting with thermochemical treatment (ContacTi), compared to a standard surface treatment obtained by sandblasting and acid etching (shot blasting). Materials and methods Twelve minipigs were used, placing the studied implants in the maxillae, and divided into three groups according to the time of sacrifice: 2, 4, and 8 weeks after implant placement. Histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed following standardized tissue polymerization, cutting, and staining and examined under optical and high-resolution electron microscope. Results For all measurements, the novel surface presented higher levels of osseointegration as compared to the shot blasting surface. Bone to implant contact (BIC) in the maxillae for ContacTi presented values of 49.02, 83.20, and 85.58% at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, respectively, significantly higher compared to the shot blasting surface values of 39.32, 46.53, and 46.20% for the same time points. Bone area density (BAD) presented values of 26.52, 61.21, and 59.50% for ContacTi surface implants and 22.95, 36.26, and 49.50% for the shot blasted surface implants. Signs of osteoconductivity were observed in the ContacTi surfaces at 2 weeks. Conclusions The ContacTi surface achieved a faster growth of hard tissues around the implants, when compared to the shot blasting surface, and for all evaluated histomorphometric parameters, the values were higher at all measured time points. Clinical relevance ContacTi could be a new surface improving the osseointegration in oral implantology. Dental implants (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bone histomorphometry (dpeaa)DE-He213 Implant stability (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bone healing (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shot blasting surface (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bioactivity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Romero Ruizª, Manuel M. verfasserin aut Calvo, Pedro Lázaro verfasserin aut Santos, José Vicente Ríos verfasserin aut Perez, Roman A. verfasserin aut Gil Mur, Francisco Javier verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 22(2017), 3 vom: 12. Okt., Seite 1423-1432 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:22 year:2017 number:3 day:12 month:10 pages:1423-1432 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2223-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 2017 3 12 10 1423-1432 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s00784-017-2223-y doi (DE-627)SPR007820437 (SPR)s00784-017-2223-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Herrero-Climent, Mariano verfasserin aut Effectiveness of a new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric comparative study in minipigs 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives The objective of this study was to assess, by histomorphometric analysis, the degree of bone apposition on two types of dental implant’s surfaces: a novel implant that combines $ Al_{2} %$ O_{3} $ abrasive particle blasting with thermochemical treatment (ContacTi), compared to a standard surface treatment obtained by sandblasting and acid etching (shot blasting). Materials and methods Twelve minipigs were used, placing the studied implants in the maxillae, and divided into three groups according to the time of sacrifice: 2, 4, and 8 weeks after implant placement. Histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed following standardized tissue polymerization, cutting, and staining and examined under optical and high-resolution electron microscope. Results For all measurements, the novel surface presented higher levels of osseointegration as compared to the shot blasting surface. Bone to implant contact (BIC) in the maxillae for ContacTi presented values of 49.02, 83.20, and 85.58% at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, respectively, significantly higher compared to the shot blasting surface values of 39.32, 46.53, and 46.20% for the same time points. Bone area density (BAD) presented values of 26.52, 61.21, and 59.50% for ContacTi surface implants and 22.95, 36.26, and 49.50% for the shot blasted surface implants. Signs of osteoconductivity were observed in the ContacTi surfaces at 2 weeks. Conclusions The ContacTi surface achieved a faster growth of hard tissues around the implants, when compared to the shot blasting surface, and for all evaluated histomorphometric parameters, the values were higher at all measured time points. Clinical relevance ContacTi could be a new surface improving the osseointegration in oral implantology. Dental implants (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bone histomorphometry (dpeaa)DE-He213 Implant stability (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bone healing (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shot blasting surface (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bioactivity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Romero Ruizª, Manuel M. verfasserin aut Calvo, Pedro Lázaro verfasserin aut Santos, José Vicente Ríos verfasserin aut Perez, Roman A. verfasserin aut Gil Mur, Francisco Javier verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 22(2017), 3 vom: 12. Okt., Seite 1423-1432 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:22 year:2017 number:3 day:12 month:10 pages:1423-1432 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2223-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 2017 3 12 10 1423-1432 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations 22(2017), 3 vom: 12. Okt., Seite 1423-1432 volume:22 year:2017 number:3 day:12 month:10 pages:1423-1432 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations 22(2017), 3 vom: 12. Okt., Seite 1423-1432 volume:22 year:2017 number:3 day:12 month:10 pages:1423-1432 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Dental implants Bone histomorphometry Implant stability Bone healing Shot blasting surface Bioactivity |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Herrero-Climent, Mariano @@aut@@ Romero Ruizª, Manuel M. @@aut@@ Calvo, Pedro Lázaro @@aut@@ Santos, José Vicente Ríos @@aut@@ Perez, Roman A. @@aut@@ Gil Mur, Francisco Javier @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-10-12T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR007794231 |
| id |
SPR007820437 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR007820437</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20201124022410.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201005s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00784-017-2223-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR007820437</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00784-017-2223-y-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Herrero-Climent, Mariano</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Effectiveness of a new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric comparative study in minipigs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objectives The objective of this study was to assess, by histomorphometric analysis, the degree of bone apposition on two types of dental implant’s surfaces: a novel implant that combines $ Al_{2} %$ O_{3} $ abrasive particle blasting with thermochemical treatment (ContacTi), compared to a standard surface treatment obtained by sandblasting and acid etching (shot blasting). Materials and methods Twelve minipigs were used, placing the studied implants in the maxillae, and divided into three groups according to the time of sacrifice: 2, 4, and 8 weeks after implant placement. Histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed following standardized tissue polymerization, cutting, and staining and examined under optical and high-resolution electron microscope. Results For all measurements, the novel surface presented higher levels of osseointegration as compared to the shot blasting surface. Bone to implant contact (BIC) in the maxillae for ContacTi presented values of 49.02, 83.20, and 85.58% at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, respectively, significantly higher compared to the shot blasting surface values of 39.32, 46.53, and 46.20% for the same time points. Bone area density (BAD) presented values of 26.52, 61.21, and 59.50% for ContacTi surface implants and 22.95, 36.26, and 49.50% for the shot blasted surface implants. Signs of osteoconductivity were observed in the ContacTi surfaces at 2 weeks. Conclusions The ContacTi surface achieved a faster growth of hard tissues around the implants, when compared to the shot blasting surface, and for all evaluated histomorphometric parameters, the values were higher at all measured time points. Clinical relevance ContacTi could be a new surface improving the osseointegration in oral implantology.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dental implants</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bone histomorphometry</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Implant stability</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bone healing</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Shot blasting surface</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bioactivity</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Romero Ruizª, Manuel M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Calvo, Pedro Lázaro</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Santos, José Vicente Ríos</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Perez, Roman A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gil Mur, Francisco Javier</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Clinical Oral Investigations</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">22(2017), 3 vom: 12. Okt., Seite 1423-1432</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR007794231</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:22</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:12</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1423-1432</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2223-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">22</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">12</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">1423-1432</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Herrero-Climent, Mariano |
| spellingShingle |
Herrero-Climent, Mariano misc Dental implants misc Bone histomorphometry misc Implant stability misc Bone healing misc Shot blasting surface misc Bioactivity Effectiveness of a new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric comparative study in minipigs |
| authorStr |
Herrero-Climent, Mariano |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR007794231 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Effectiveness of a new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric comparative study in minipigs Dental implants (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bone histomorphometry (dpeaa)DE-He213 Implant stability (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bone healing (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shot blasting surface (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bioactivity (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Dental implants misc Bone histomorphometry misc Implant stability misc Bone healing misc Shot blasting surface misc Bioactivity |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Dental implants misc Bone histomorphometry misc Implant stability misc Bone healing misc Shot blasting surface misc Bioactivity |
| topic_browse |
misc Dental implants misc Bone histomorphometry misc Implant stability misc Bone healing misc Shot blasting surface misc Bioactivity |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR007794231 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR007794231 |
| title |
Effectiveness of a new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric comparative study in minipigs |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR007820437 (SPR)s00784-017-2223-y-e |
| title_full |
Effectiveness of a new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric comparative study in minipigs |
| author_sort |
Herrero-Climent, Mariano |
| journal |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| journalStr |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1423 |
| author_browse |
Herrero-Climent, Mariano Romero Ruizª, Manuel M. Calvo, Pedro Lázaro Santos, José Vicente Ríos Perez, Roman A. Gil Mur, Francisco Javier |
| container_volume |
22 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Herrero-Climent, Mariano |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s00784-017-2223-y |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
effectiveness of a new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric comparative study in minipigs |
| title_auth |
Effectiveness of a new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric comparative study in minipigs |
| abstract |
Objectives The objective of this study was to assess, by histomorphometric analysis, the degree of bone apposition on two types of dental implant’s surfaces: a novel implant that combines $ Al_{2} %$ O_{3} $ abrasive particle blasting with thermochemical treatment (ContacTi), compared to a standard surface treatment obtained by sandblasting and acid etching (shot blasting). Materials and methods Twelve minipigs were used, placing the studied implants in the maxillae, and divided into three groups according to the time of sacrifice: 2, 4, and 8 weeks after implant placement. Histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed following standardized tissue polymerization, cutting, and staining and examined under optical and high-resolution electron microscope. Results For all measurements, the novel surface presented higher levels of osseointegration as compared to the shot blasting surface. Bone to implant contact (BIC) in the maxillae for ContacTi presented values of 49.02, 83.20, and 85.58% at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, respectively, significantly higher compared to the shot blasting surface values of 39.32, 46.53, and 46.20% for the same time points. Bone area density (BAD) presented values of 26.52, 61.21, and 59.50% for ContacTi surface implants and 22.95, 36.26, and 49.50% for the shot blasted surface implants. Signs of osteoconductivity were observed in the ContacTi surfaces at 2 weeks. Conclusions The ContacTi surface achieved a faster growth of hard tissues around the implants, when compared to the shot blasting surface, and for all evaluated histomorphometric parameters, the values were higher at all measured time points. Clinical relevance ContacTi could be a new surface improving the osseointegration in oral implantology. |
| abstractGer |
Objectives The objective of this study was to assess, by histomorphometric analysis, the degree of bone apposition on two types of dental implant’s surfaces: a novel implant that combines $ Al_{2} %$ O_{3} $ abrasive particle blasting with thermochemical treatment (ContacTi), compared to a standard surface treatment obtained by sandblasting and acid etching (shot blasting). Materials and methods Twelve minipigs were used, placing the studied implants in the maxillae, and divided into three groups according to the time of sacrifice: 2, 4, and 8 weeks after implant placement. Histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed following standardized tissue polymerization, cutting, and staining and examined under optical and high-resolution electron microscope. Results For all measurements, the novel surface presented higher levels of osseointegration as compared to the shot blasting surface. Bone to implant contact (BIC) in the maxillae for ContacTi presented values of 49.02, 83.20, and 85.58% at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, respectively, significantly higher compared to the shot blasting surface values of 39.32, 46.53, and 46.20% for the same time points. Bone area density (BAD) presented values of 26.52, 61.21, and 59.50% for ContacTi surface implants and 22.95, 36.26, and 49.50% for the shot blasted surface implants. Signs of osteoconductivity were observed in the ContacTi surfaces at 2 weeks. Conclusions The ContacTi surface achieved a faster growth of hard tissues around the implants, when compared to the shot blasting surface, and for all evaluated histomorphometric parameters, the values were higher at all measured time points. Clinical relevance ContacTi could be a new surface improving the osseointegration in oral implantology. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Objectives The objective of this study was to assess, by histomorphometric analysis, the degree of bone apposition on two types of dental implant’s surfaces: a novel implant that combines $ Al_{2} %$ O_{3} $ abrasive particle blasting with thermochemical treatment (ContacTi), compared to a standard surface treatment obtained by sandblasting and acid etching (shot blasting). Materials and methods Twelve minipigs were used, placing the studied implants in the maxillae, and divided into three groups according to the time of sacrifice: 2, 4, and 8 weeks after implant placement. Histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed following standardized tissue polymerization, cutting, and staining and examined under optical and high-resolution electron microscope. Results For all measurements, the novel surface presented higher levels of osseointegration as compared to the shot blasting surface. Bone to implant contact (BIC) in the maxillae for ContacTi presented values of 49.02, 83.20, and 85.58% at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, respectively, significantly higher compared to the shot blasting surface values of 39.32, 46.53, and 46.20% for the same time points. Bone area density (BAD) presented values of 26.52, 61.21, and 59.50% for ContacTi surface implants and 22.95, 36.26, and 49.50% for the shot blasted surface implants. Signs of osteoconductivity were observed in the ContacTi surfaces at 2 weeks. Conclusions The ContacTi surface achieved a faster growth of hard tissues around the implants, when compared to the shot blasting surface, and for all evaluated histomorphometric parameters, the values were higher at all measured time points. Clinical relevance ContacTi could be a new surface improving the osseointegration in oral implantology. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Effectiveness of a new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric comparative study in minipigs |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2223-y |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Romero Ruizª, Manuel M. Calvo, Pedro Lázaro Santos, José Vicente Ríos Perez, Roman A. Gil Mur, Francisco Javier |
| author2Str |
Romero Ruizª, Manuel M. Calvo, Pedro Lázaro Santos, José Vicente Ríos Perez, Roman A. Gil Mur, Francisco Javier |
| ppnlink |
SPR007794231 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s00784-017-2223-y |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T15:26:41.810Z |
| _version_ |
1803572112847273984 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR007820437</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20201124022410.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201005s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00784-017-2223-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR007820437</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00784-017-2223-y-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Herrero-Climent, Mariano</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Effectiveness of a new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric comparative study in minipigs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objectives The objective of this study was to assess, by histomorphometric analysis, the degree of bone apposition on two types of dental implant’s surfaces: a novel implant that combines $ Al_{2} %$ O_{3} $ abrasive particle blasting with thermochemical treatment (ContacTi), compared to a standard surface treatment obtained by sandblasting and acid etching (shot blasting). Materials and methods Twelve minipigs were used, placing the studied implants in the maxillae, and divided into three groups according to the time of sacrifice: 2, 4, and 8 weeks after implant placement. Histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed following standardized tissue polymerization, cutting, and staining and examined under optical and high-resolution electron microscope. Results For all measurements, the novel surface presented higher levels of osseointegration as compared to the shot blasting surface. Bone to implant contact (BIC) in the maxillae for ContacTi presented values of 49.02, 83.20, and 85.58% at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, respectively, significantly higher compared to the shot blasting surface values of 39.32, 46.53, and 46.20% for the same time points. Bone area density (BAD) presented values of 26.52, 61.21, and 59.50% for ContacTi surface implants and 22.95, 36.26, and 49.50% for the shot blasted surface implants. Signs of osteoconductivity were observed in the ContacTi surfaces at 2 weeks. Conclusions The ContacTi surface achieved a faster growth of hard tissues around the implants, when compared to the shot blasting surface, and for all evaluated histomorphometric parameters, the values were higher at all measured time points. Clinical relevance ContacTi could be a new surface improving the osseointegration in oral implantology.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dental implants</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bone histomorphometry</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Implant stability</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bone healing</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Shot blasting surface</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bioactivity</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Romero Ruizª, Manuel M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Calvo, Pedro Lázaro</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Santos, José Vicente Ríos</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Perez, Roman A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gil Mur, Francisco Javier</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Clinical Oral Investigations</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">22(2017), 3 vom: 12. Okt., Seite 1423-1432</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR007794231</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:22</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:12</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1423-1432</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2223-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">22</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">12</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">1423-1432</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400943 |