A web-based endodontic case difficulty assessment tool
Objective To develop a web-based tool to facilitate identification, evaluation and management of teeth requiring endodontic treatment. Materials and methods Following a literature search and thorough analysis of existing case difficulty assessment forms, the web-based tool was developed using an onl...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Shah, P. K. [verfasserIn] Chong, B. S. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2018 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Clinical Oral Investigations - Springer-Verlag, 2001, 22(2018), 6 vom: 25. Jan., Seite 2381-2388 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:22 ; year:2018 ; number:6 ; day:25 ; month:01 ; pages:2381-2388 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s00784-018-2341-1 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR007821646 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR007821646 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20201124022416.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201005s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00784-018-2341-1 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR007821646 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s00784-018-2341-1-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Shah, P. K. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A web-based endodontic case difficulty assessment tool |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Objective To develop a web-based tool to facilitate identification, evaluation and management of teeth requiring endodontic treatment. Materials and methods Following a literature search and thorough analysis of existing case difficulty assessment forms, the web-based tool was developed using an online survey builder (Qualtrics, Qualtrics Lab, UT, USA). Following feedback from a pilot study, it was refined and improved. A study was performed, using the updated version (EndoApp) on a cohort (n = 53) of dental professionals and dental students. The participants were e-mailed instructions detailing the assessment of five test cases using EndoApp, followed by completion of a structured feedback form. Analysis of the EndoApp responses was used to evaluate usage times, whereas the results of the feedback forms were used to assess user experience and relevance, other potential applications and comments on further improvement/s. Results The average usage time was 2 min 7 s; the average times needed for the last three (Cases 3–5) were significantly less than the preceding two (Cases 1 & 2) test cases. An overwhelming majority of participants expressed favourable views on user experience and relevance of the web-based case difficulty assessment tool. Only two participants (4%) were unlikely or very unlikely to use EndoApp again. The potential application of EndoApp as an ‘educational tool’ and for ‘primary care triage’ was deemed the most popular features and of greater importance than the secondary options of ‘fee setting’ and as a ‘dento-legal justification tool’. Conclusions Within the study limitations, owing to its ability to quantify the level of difficulty and provide guidance, EndoApp was considered user-friendly and helped facilitate endodontic case difficulty assessment. From the feedback, further improvements and the development of a Smartphone App version are in progress. Clinical relevance EndoApp may facilitate treatment planning, improve treatment cost-effectiveness and reduce frequency of procedural errors by providing appropriate guidance on endodontic case management. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Case difficulty assessment |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Endodontic treatment |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Treatment risks |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Web-based tool |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chong, B. S. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Clinical Oral Investigations |d Springer-Verlag, 2001 |g 22(2018), 6 vom: 25. Jan., Seite 2381-2388 |w (DE-627)SPR007794231 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:2018 |g number:6 |g day:25 |g month:01 |g pages:2381-2388 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2341-1 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 22 |j 2018 |e 6 |b 25 |c 01 |h 2381-2388 | ||
| author_variant |
p k s pk pks b s c bs bsc |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
shahpkchongbs:2018----:wbaeeddnicsdfiut |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2018 |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s00784-018-2341-1 doi (DE-627)SPR007821646 (SPR)s00784-018-2341-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Shah, P. K. verfasserin aut A web-based endodontic case difficulty assessment tool 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objective To develop a web-based tool to facilitate identification, evaluation and management of teeth requiring endodontic treatment. Materials and methods Following a literature search and thorough analysis of existing case difficulty assessment forms, the web-based tool was developed using an online survey builder (Qualtrics, Qualtrics Lab, UT, USA). Following feedback from a pilot study, it was refined and improved. A study was performed, using the updated version (EndoApp) on a cohort (n = 53) of dental professionals and dental students. The participants were e-mailed instructions detailing the assessment of five test cases using EndoApp, followed by completion of a structured feedback form. Analysis of the EndoApp responses was used to evaluate usage times, whereas the results of the feedback forms were used to assess user experience and relevance, other potential applications and comments on further improvement/s. Results The average usage time was 2 min 7 s; the average times needed for the last three (Cases 3–5) were significantly less than the preceding two (Cases 1 & 2) test cases. An overwhelming majority of participants expressed favourable views on user experience and relevance of the web-based case difficulty assessment tool. Only two participants (4%) were unlikely or very unlikely to use EndoApp again. The potential application of EndoApp as an ‘educational tool’ and for ‘primary care triage’ was deemed the most popular features and of greater importance than the secondary options of ‘fee setting’ and as a ‘dento-legal justification tool’. Conclusions Within the study limitations, owing to its ability to quantify the level of difficulty and provide guidance, EndoApp was considered user-friendly and helped facilitate endodontic case difficulty assessment. From the feedback, further improvements and the development of a Smartphone App version are in progress. Clinical relevance EndoApp may facilitate treatment planning, improve treatment cost-effectiveness and reduce frequency of procedural errors by providing appropriate guidance on endodontic case management. Case difficulty assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Endodontic treatment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Treatment risks (dpeaa)DE-He213 Web-based tool (dpeaa)DE-He213 Chong, B. S. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 22(2018), 6 vom: 25. Jan., Seite 2381-2388 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:22 year:2018 number:6 day:25 month:01 pages:2381-2388 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2341-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 2018 6 25 01 2381-2388 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s00784-018-2341-1 doi (DE-627)SPR007821646 (SPR)s00784-018-2341-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Shah, P. K. verfasserin aut A web-based endodontic case difficulty assessment tool 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objective To develop a web-based tool to facilitate identification, evaluation and management of teeth requiring endodontic treatment. Materials and methods Following a literature search and thorough analysis of existing case difficulty assessment forms, the web-based tool was developed using an online survey builder (Qualtrics, Qualtrics Lab, UT, USA). Following feedback from a pilot study, it was refined and improved. A study was performed, using the updated version (EndoApp) on a cohort (n = 53) of dental professionals and dental students. The participants were e-mailed instructions detailing the assessment of five test cases using EndoApp, followed by completion of a structured feedback form. Analysis of the EndoApp responses was used to evaluate usage times, whereas the results of the feedback forms were used to assess user experience and relevance, other potential applications and comments on further improvement/s. Results The average usage time was 2 min 7 s; the average times needed for the last three (Cases 3–5) were significantly less than the preceding two (Cases 1 & 2) test cases. An overwhelming majority of participants expressed favourable views on user experience and relevance of the web-based case difficulty assessment tool. Only two participants (4%) were unlikely or very unlikely to use EndoApp again. The potential application of EndoApp as an ‘educational tool’ and for ‘primary care triage’ was deemed the most popular features and of greater importance than the secondary options of ‘fee setting’ and as a ‘dento-legal justification tool’. Conclusions Within the study limitations, owing to its ability to quantify the level of difficulty and provide guidance, EndoApp was considered user-friendly and helped facilitate endodontic case difficulty assessment. From the feedback, further improvements and the development of a Smartphone App version are in progress. Clinical relevance EndoApp may facilitate treatment planning, improve treatment cost-effectiveness and reduce frequency of procedural errors by providing appropriate guidance on endodontic case management. Case difficulty assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Endodontic treatment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Treatment risks (dpeaa)DE-He213 Web-based tool (dpeaa)DE-He213 Chong, B. S. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 22(2018), 6 vom: 25. Jan., Seite 2381-2388 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:22 year:2018 number:6 day:25 month:01 pages:2381-2388 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2341-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 2018 6 25 01 2381-2388 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s00784-018-2341-1 doi (DE-627)SPR007821646 (SPR)s00784-018-2341-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Shah, P. K. verfasserin aut A web-based endodontic case difficulty assessment tool 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objective To develop a web-based tool to facilitate identification, evaluation and management of teeth requiring endodontic treatment. Materials and methods Following a literature search and thorough analysis of existing case difficulty assessment forms, the web-based tool was developed using an online survey builder (Qualtrics, Qualtrics Lab, UT, USA). Following feedback from a pilot study, it was refined and improved. A study was performed, using the updated version (EndoApp) on a cohort (n = 53) of dental professionals and dental students. The participants were e-mailed instructions detailing the assessment of five test cases using EndoApp, followed by completion of a structured feedback form. Analysis of the EndoApp responses was used to evaluate usage times, whereas the results of the feedback forms were used to assess user experience and relevance, other potential applications and comments on further improvement/s. Results The average usage time was 2 min 7 s; the average times needed for the last three (Cases 3–5) were significantly less than the preceding two (Cases 1 & 2) test cases. An overwhelming majority of participants expressed favourable views on user experience and relevance of the web-based case difficulty assessment tool. Only two participants (4%) were unlikely or very unlikely to use EndoApp again. The potential application of EndoApp as an ‘educational tool’ and for ‘primary care triage’ was deemed the most popular features and of greater importance than the secondary options of ‘fee setting’ and as a ‘dento-legal justification tool’. Conclusions Within the study limitations, owing to its ability to quantify the level of difficulty and provide guidance, EndoApp was considered user-friendly and helped facilitate endodontic case difficulty assessment. From the feedback, further improvements and the development of a Smartphone App version are in progress. Clinical relevance EndoApp may facilitate treatment planning, improve treatment cost-effectiveness and reduce frequency of procedural errors by providing appropriate guidance on endodontic case management. Case difficulty assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Endodontic treatment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Treatment risks (dpeaa)DE-He213 Web-based tool (dpeaa)DE-He213 Chong, B. S. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 22(2018), 6 vom: 25. Jan., Seite 2381-2388 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:22 year:2018 number:6 day:25 month:01 pages:2381-2388 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2341-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 2018 6 25 01 2381-2388 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s00784-018-2341-1 doi (DE-627)SPR007821646 (SPR)s00784-018-2341-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Shah, P. K. verfasserin aut A web-based endodontic case difficulty assessment tool 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objective To develop a web-based tool to facilitate identification, evaluation and management of teeth requiring endodontic treatment. Materials and methods Following a literature search and thorough analysis of existing case difficulty assessment forms, the web-based tool was developed using an online survey builder (Qualtrics, Qualtrics Lab, UT, USA). Following feedback from a pilot study, it was refined and improved. A study was performed, using the updated version (EndoApp) on a cohort (n = 53) of dental professionals and dental students. The participants were e-mailed instructions detailing the assessment of five test cases using EndoApp, followed by completion of a structured feedback form. Analysis of the EndoApp responses was used to evaluate usage times, whereas the results of the feedback forms were used to assess user experience and relevance, other potential applications and comments on further improvement/s. Results The average usage time was 2 min 7 s; the average times needed for the last three (Cases 3–5) were significantly less than the preceding two (Cases 1 & 2) test cases. An overwhelming majority of participants expressed favourable views on user experience and relevance of the web-based case difficulty assessment tool. Only two participants (4%) were unlikely or very unlikely to use EndoApp again. The potential application of EndoApp as an ‘educational tool’ and for ‘primary care triage’ was deemed the most popular features and of greater importance than the secondary options of ‘fee setting’ and as a ‘dento-legal justification tool’. Conclusions Within the study limitations, owing to its ability to quantify the level of difficulty and provide guidance, EndoApp was considered user-friendly and helped facilitate endodontic case difficulty assessment. From the feedback, further improvements and the development of a Smartphone App version are in progress. Clinical relevance EndoApp may facilitate treatment planning, improve treatment cost-effectiveness and reduce frequency of procedural errors by providing appropriate guidance on endodontic case management. Case difficulty assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Endodontic treatment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Treatment risks (dpeaa)DE-He213 Web-based tool (dpeaa)DE-He213 Chong, B. S. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 22(2018), 6 vom: 25. Jan., Seite 2381-2388 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:22 year:2018 number:6 day:25 month:01 pages:2381-2388 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2341-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 2018 6 25 01 2381-2388 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s00784-018-2341-1 doi (DE-627)SPR007821646 (SPR)s00784-018-2341-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Shah, P. K. verfasserin aut A web-based endodontic case difficulty assessment tool 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objective To develop a web-based tool to facilitate identification, evaluation and management of teeth requiring endodontic treatment. Materials and methods Following a literature search and thorough analysis of existing case difficulty assessment forms, the web-based tool was developed using an online survey builder (Qualtrics, Qualtrics Lab, UT, USA). Following feedback from a pilot study, it was refined and improved. A study was performed, using the updated version (EndoApp) on a cohort (n = 53) of dental professionals and dental students. The participants were e-mailed instructions detailing the assessment of five test cases using EndoApp, followed by completion of a structured feedback form. Analysis of the EndoApp responses was used to evaluate usage times, whereas the results of the feedback forms were used to assess user experience and relevance, other potential applications and comments on further improvement/s. Results The average usage time was 2 min 7 s; the average times needed for the last three (Cases 3–5) were significantly less than the preceding two (Cases 1 & 2) test cases. An overwhelming majority of participants expressed favourable views on user experience and relevance of the web-based case difficulty assessment tool. Only two participants (4%) were unlikely or very unlikely to use EndoApp again. The potential application of EndoApp as an ‘educational tool’ and for ‘primary care triage’ was deemed the most popular features and of greater importance than the secondary options of ‘fee setting’ and as a ‘dento-legal justification tool’. Conclusions Within the study limitations, owing to its ability to quantify the level of difficulty and provide guidance, EndoApp was considered user-friendly and helped facilitate endodontic case difficulty assessment. From the feedback, further improvements and the development of a Smartphone App version are in progress. Clinical relevance EndoApp may facilitate treatment planning, improve treatment cost-effectiveness and reduce frequency of procedural errors by providing appropriate guidance on endodontic case management. Case difficulty assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Endodontic treatment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Treatment risks (dpeaa)DE-He213 Web-based tool (dpeaa)DE-He213 Chong, B. S. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 22(2018), 6 vom: 25. Jan., Seite 2381-2388 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:22 year:2018 number:6 day:25 month:01 pages:2381-2388 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2341-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 2018 6 25 01 2381-2388 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations 22(2018), 6 vom: 25. Jan., Seite 2381-2388 volume:22 year:2018 number:6 day:25 month:01 pages:2381-2388 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations 22(2018), 6 vom: 25. Jan., Seite 2381-2388 volume:22 year:2018 number:6 day:25 month:01 pages:2381-2388 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Case difficulty assessment Endodontic treatment Treatment risks Web-based tool |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Shah, P. K. @@aut@@ Chong, B. S. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-01-25T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR007794231 |
| id |
SPR007821646 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR007821646</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20201124022416.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201005s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00784-018-2341-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR007821646</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00784-018-2341-1-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shah, P. K.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A web-based endodontic case difficulty assessment tool</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objective To develop a web-based tool to facilitate identification, evaluation and management of teeth requiring endodontic treatment. Materials and methods Following a literature search and thorough analysis of existing case difficulty assessment forms, the web-based tool was developed using an online survey builder (Qualtrics, Qualtrics Lab, UT, USA). Following feedback from a pilot study, it was refined and improved. A study was performed, using the updated version (EndoApp) on a cohort (n = 53) of dental professionals and dental students. The participants were e-mailed instructions detailing the assessment of five test cases using EndoApp, followed by completion of a structured feedback form. Analysis of the EndoApp responses was used to evaluate usage times, whereas the results of the feedback forms were used to assess user experience and relevance, other potential applications and comments on further improvement/s. Results The average usage time was 2 min 7 s; the average times needed for the last three (Cases 3–5) were significantly less than the preceding two (Cases 1 & 2) test cases. An overwhelming majority of participants expressed favourable views on user experience and relevance of the web-based case difficulty assessment tool. Only two participants (4%) were unlikely or very unlikely to use EndoApp again. The potential application of EndoApp as an ‘educational tool’ and for ‘primary care triage’ was deemed the most popular features and of greater importance than the secondary options of ‘fee setting’ and as a ‘dento-legal justification tool’. Conclusions Within the study limitations, owing to its ability to quantify the level of difficulty and provide guidance, EndoApp was considered user-friendly and helped facilitate endodontic case difficulty assessment. From the feedback, further improvements and the development of a Smartphone App version are in progress. Clinical relevance EndoApp may facilitate treatment planning, improve treatment cost-effectiveness and reduce frequency of procedural errors by providing appropriate guidance on endodontic case management.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Case difficulty assessment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Endodontic treatment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Treatment risks</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Web-based tool</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chong, B. S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Clinical Oral Investigations</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">22(2018), 6 vom: 25. Jan., Seite 2381-2388</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR007794231</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:22</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:25</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2381-2388</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2341-1</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">22</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="b">25</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">2381-2388</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Shah, P. K. |
| spellingShingle |
Shah, P. K. misc Case difficulty assessment misc Endodontic treatment misc Treatment risks misc Web-based tool A web-based endodontic case difficulty assessment tool |
| authorStr |
Shah, P. K. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR007794231 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
A web-based endodontic case difficulty assessment tool Case difficulty assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Endodontic treatment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Treatment risks (dpeaa)DE-He213 Web-based tool (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Case difficulty assessment misc Endodontic treatment misc Treatment risks misc Web-based tool |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Case difficulty assessment misc Endodontic treatment misc Treatment risks misc Web-based tool |
| topic_browse |
misc Case difficulty assessment misc Endodontic treatment misc Treatment risks misc Web-based tool |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR007794231 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR007794231 |
| title |
A web-based endodontic case difficulty assessment tool |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR007821646 (SPR)s00784-018-2341-1-e |
| title_full |
A web-based endodontic case difficulty assessment tool |
| author_sort |
Shah, P. K. |
| journal |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| journalStr |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
2381 |
| author_browse |
Shah, P. K. Chong, B. S. |
| container_volume |
22 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Shah, P. K. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s00784-018-2341-1 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
web-based endodontic case difficulty assessment tool |
| title_auth |
A web-based endodontic case difficulty assessment tool |
| abstract |
Objective To develop a web-based tool to facilitate identification, evaluation and management of teeth requiring endodontic treatment. Materials and methods Following a literature search and thorough analysis of existing case difficulty assessment forms, the web-based tool was developed using an online survey builder (Qualtrics, Qualtrics Lab, UT, USA). Following feedback from a pilot study, it was refined and improved. A study was performed, using the updated version (EndoApp) on a cohort (n = 53) of dental professionals and dental students. The participants were e-mailed instructions detailing the assessment of five test cases using EndoApp, followed by completion of a structured feedback form. Analysis of the EndoApp responses was used to evaluate usage times, whereas the results of the feedback forms were used to assess user experience and relevance, other potential applications and comments on further improvement/s. Results The average usage time was 2 min 7 s; the average times needed for the last three (Cases 3–5) were significantly less than the preceding two (Cases 1 & 2) test cases. An overwhelming majority of participants expressed favourable views on user experience and relevance of the web-based case difficulty assessment tool. Only two participants (4%) were unlikely or very unlikely to use EndoApp again. The potential application of EndoApp as an ‘educational tool’ and for ‘primary care triage’ was deemed the most popular features and of greater importance than the secondary options of ‘fee setting’ and as a ‘dento-legal justification tool’. Conclusions Within the study limitations, owing to its ability to quantify the level of difficulty and provide guidance, EndoApp was considered user-friendly and helped facilitate endodontic case difficulty assessment. From the feedback, further improvements and the development of a Smartphone App version are in progress. Clinical relevance EndoApp may facilitate treatment planning, improve treatment cost-effectiveness and reduce frequency of procedural errors by providing appropriate guidance on endodontic case management. |
| abstractGer |
Objective To develop a web-based tool to facilitate identification, evaluation and management of teeth requiring endodontic treatment. Materials and methods Following a literature search and thorough analysis of existing case difficulty assessment forms, the web-based tool was developed using an online survey builder (Qualtrics, Qualtrics Lab, UT, USA). Following feedback from a pilot study, it was refined and improved. A study was performed, using the updated version (EndoApp) on a cohort (n = 53) of dental professionals and dental students. The participants were e-mailed instructions detailing the assessment of five test cases using EndoApp, followed by completion of a structured feedback form. Analysis of the EndoApp responses was used to evaluate usage times, whereas the results of the feedback forms were used to assess user experience and relevance, other potential applications and comments on further improvement/s. Results The average usage time was 2 min 7 s; the average times needed for the last three (Cases 3–5) were significantly less than the preceding two (Cases 1 & 2) test cases. An overwhelming majority of participants expressed favourable views on user experience and relevance of the web-based case difficulty assessment tool. Only two participants (4%) were unlikely or very unlikely to use EndoApp again. The potential application of EndoApp as an ‘educational tool’ and for ‘primary care triage’ was deemed the most popular features and of greater importance than the secondary options of ‘fee setting’ and as a ‘dento-legal justification tool’. Conclusions Within the study limitations, owing to its ability to quantify the level of difficulty and provide guidance, EndoApp was considered user-friendly and helped facilitate endodontic case difficulty assessment. From the feedback, further improvements and the development of a Smartphone App version are in progress. Clinical relevance EndoApp may facilitate treatment planning, improve treatment cost-effectiveness and reduce frequency of procedural errors by providing appropriate guidance on endodontic case management. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Objective To develop a web-based tool to facilitate identification, evaluation and management of teeth requiring endodontic treatment. Materials and methods Following a literature search and thorough analysis of existing case difficulty assessment forms, the web-based tool was developed using an online survey builder (Qualtrics, Qualtrics Lab, UT, USA). Following feedback from a pilot study, it was refined and improved. A study was performed, using the updated version (EndoApp) on a cohort (n = 53) of dental professionals and dental students. The participants were e-mailed instructions detailing the assessment of five test cases using EndoApp, followed by completion of a structured feedback form. Analysis of the EndoApp responses was used to evaluate usage times, whereas the results of the feedback forms were used to assess user experience and relevance, other potential applications and comments on further improvement/s. Results The average usage time was 2 min 7 s; the average times needed for the last three (Cases 3–5) were significantly less than the preceding two (Cases 1 & 2) test cases. An overwhelming majority of participants expressed favourable views on user experience and relevance of the web-based case difficulty assessment tool. Only two participants (4%) were unlikely or very unlikely to use EndoApp again. The potential application of EndoApp as an ‘educational tool’ and for ‘primary care triage’ was deemed the most popular features and of greater importance than the secondary options of ‘fee setting’ and as a ‘dento-legal justification tool’. Conclusions Within the study limitations, owing to its ability to quantify the level of difficulty and provide guidance, EndoApp was considered user-friendly and helped facilitate endodontic case difficulty assessment. From the feedback, further improvements and the development of a Smartphone App version are in progress. Clinical relevance EndoApp may facilitate treatment planning, improve treatment cost-effectiveness and reduce frequency of procedural errors by providing appropriate guidance on endodontic case management. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
6 |
| title_short |
A web-based endodontic case difficulty assessment tool |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2341-1 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Chong, B. S. |
| author2Str |
Chong, B. S. |
| ppnlink |
SPR007794231 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s00784-018-2341-1 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T15:27:10.653Z |
| _version_ |
1803572143089254400 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR007821646</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20201124022416.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201005s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00784-018-2341-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR007821646</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00784-018-2341-1-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shah, P. K.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A web-based endodontic case difficulty assessment tool</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objective To develop a web-based tool to facilitate identification, evaluation and management of teeth requiring endodontic treatment. Materials and methods Following a literature search and thorough analysis of existing case difficulty assessment forms, the web-based tool was developed using an online survey builder (Qualtrics, Qualtrics Lab, UT, USA). Following feedback from a pilot study, it was refined and improved. A study was performed, using the updated version (EndoApp) on a cohort (n = 53) of dental professionals and dental students. The participants were e-mailed instructions detailing the assessment of five test cases using EndoApp, followed by completion of a structured feedback form. Analysis of the EndoApp responses was used to evaluate usage times, whereas the results of the feedback forms were used to assess user experience and relevance, other potential applications and comments on further improvement/s. Results The average usage time was 2 min 7 s; the average times needed for the last three (Cases 3–5) were significantly less than the preceding two (Cases 1 & 2) test cases. An overwhelming majority of participants expressed favourable views on user experience and relevance of the web-based case difficulty assessment tool. Only two participants (4%) were unlikely or very unlikely to use EndoApp again. The potential application of EndoApp as an ‘educational tool’ and for ‘primary care triage’ was deemed the most popular features and of greater importance than the secondary options of ‘fee setting’ and as a ‘dento-legal justification tool’. Conclusions Within the study limitations, owing to its ability to quantify the level of difficulty and provide guidance, EndoApp was considered user-friendly and helped facilitate endodontic case difficulty assessment. From the feedback, further improvements and the development of a Smartphone App version are in progress. Clinical relevance EndoApp may facilitate treatment planning, improve treatment cost-effectiveness and reduce frequency of procedural errors by providing appropriate guidance on endodontic case management.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Case difficulty assessment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Endodontic treatment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Treatment risks</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Web-based tool</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chong, B. S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Clinical Oral Investigations</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">22(2018), 6 vom: 25. Jan., Seite 2381-2388</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR007794231</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:22</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:25</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2381-2388</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2341-1</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">22</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="b">25</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">2381-2388</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400017 |