Assessing the effects of introducing a new software development process: a methodological description
Abstract In this article, we report from a 22-months long action research study in which we evaluate the usefulness of a set of software development tools in an industrial setting, a small software company. We focus on how developers in the industry use and adopt these tools, what expectations they...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Nilsson, Agneta [verfasserIn] Castro, Laura M. [verfasserIn] Rivas, Samuel [verfasserIn] Arts, Thomas [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2013 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer - Springer-Verlag, 1997, 17(2013), 1 vom: 13. Apr., Seite 1-16 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:17 ; year:2013 ; number:1 ; day:13 ; month:04 ; pages:1-16 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10009-013-0275-0 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
SPR008006180 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | SPR008006180 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20201124023051.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 201005s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10009-013-0275-0 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)SPR008006180 | ||
035 | |a (SPR)s10009-013-0275-0-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Nilsson, Agneta |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Assessing the effects of introducing a new software development process: a methodological description |
264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Abstract In this article, we report from a 22-months long action research study in which we evaluate the usefulness of a set of software development tools in an industrial setting, a small software company. We focus on how developers in the industry use and adopt these tools, what expectations they have on them, how the tools can be improved, and how the adoption process itself can be improved. We describe these change processes from a methodological perspective, how we monitored the processes, how we reviewed the outcomes, and the strategies that we applied. We show how the processes evolved, intermediate results, and the steps that were taken along the way based on the outcomes. We believe that the described study may inspire other tool-developers and/or researchers to organize similar studies to further our understanding of the complex processes involved in the adoption of software development tools in industry. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Software development process |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Process improvement |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Process change |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Change assessment |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
700 | 1 | |a Castro, Laura M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Rivas, Samuel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Arts, Thomas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer |d Springer-Verlag, 1997 |g 17(2013), 1 vom: 13. Apr., Seite 1-16 |w (DE-627)SPR008001103 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:17 |g year:2013 |g number:1 |g day:13 |g month:04 |g pages:1-16 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10009-013-0275-0 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 17 |j 2013 |e 1 |b 13 |c 04 |h 1-16 |
author_variant |
a n an l m c lm lmc s r sr t a ta |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
nilssonagnetacastrolauramrivassamuelarts:2013----:sesntefetoitouignwotaeeeomnpoesmt |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2013 |
publishDate |
2013 |
allfields |
10.1007/s10009-013-0275-0 doi (DE-627)SPR008006180 (SPR)s10009-013-0275-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Nilsson, Agneta verfasserin aut Assessing the effects of introducing a new software development process: a methodological description 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract In this article, we report from a 22-months long action research study in which we evaluate the usefulness of a set of software development tools in an industrial setting, a small software company. We focus on how developers in the industry use and adopt these tools, what expectations they have on them, how the tools can be improved, and how the adoption process itself can be improved. We describe these change processes from a methodological perspective, how we monitored the processes, how we reviewed the outcomes, and the strategies that we applied. We show how the processes evolved, intermediate results, and the steps that were taken along the way based on the outcomes. We believe that the described study may inspire other tool-developers and/or researchers to organize similar studies to further our understanding of the complex processes involved in the adoption of software development tools in industry. Software development process (dpeaa)DE-He213 Process improvement (dpeaa)DE-He213 Process change (dpeaa)DE-He213 Change assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Castro, Laura M. verfasserin aut Rivas, Samuel verfasserin aut Arts, Thomas verfasserin aut Enthalten in International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer Springer-Verlag, 1997 17(2013), 1 vom: 13. Apr., Seite 1-16 (DE-627)SPR008001103 nnns volume:17 year:2013 number:1 day:13 month:04 pages:1-16 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10009-013-0275-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 17 2013 1 13 04 1-16 |
spelling |
10.1007/s10009-013-0275-0 doi (DE-627)SPR008006180 (SPR)s10009-013-0275-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Nilsson, Agneta verfasserin aut Assessing the effects of introducing a new software development process: a methodological description 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract In this article, we report from a 22-months long action research study in which we evaluate the usefulness of a set of software development tools in an industrial setting, a small software company. We focus on how developers in the industry use and adopt these tools, what expectations they have on them, how the tools can be improved, and how the adoption process itself can be improved. We describe these change processes from a methodological perspective, how we monitored the processes, how we reviewed the outcomes, and the strategies that we applied. We show how the processes evolved, intermediate results, and the steps that were taken along the way based on the outcomes. We believe that the described study may inspire other tool-developers and/or researchers to organize similar studies to further our understanding of the complex processes involved in the adoption of software development tools in industry. Software development process (dpeaa)DE-He213 Process improvement (dpeaa)DE-He213 Process change (dpeaa)DE-He213 Change assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Castro, Laura M. verfasserin aut Rivas, Samuel verfasserin aut Arts, Thomas verfasserin aut Enthalten in International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer Springer-Verlag, 1997 17(2013), 1 vom: 13. Apr., Seite 1-16 (DE-627)SPR008001103 nnns volume:17 year:2013 number:1 day:13 month:04 pages:1-16 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10009-013-0275-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 17 2013 1 13 04 1-16 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10009-013-0275-0 doi (DE-627)SPR008006180 (SPR)s10009-013-0275-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Nilsson, Agneta verfasserin aut Assessing the effects of introducing a new software development process: a methodological description 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract In this article, we report from a 22-months long action research study in which we evaluate the usefulness of a set of software development tools in an industrial setting, a small software company. We focus on how developers in the industry use and adopt these tools, what expectations they have on them, how the tools can be improved, and how the adoption process itself can be improved. We describe these change processes from a methodological perspective, how we monitored the processes, how we reviewed the outcomes, and the strategies that we applied. We show how the processes evolved, intermediate results, and the steps that were taken along the way based on the outcomes. We believe that the described study may inspire other tool-developers and/or researchers to organize similar studies to further our understanding of the complex processes involved in the adoption of software development tools in industry. Software development process (dpeaa)DE-He213 Process improvement (dpeaa)DE-He213 Process change (dpeaa)DE-He213 Change assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Castro, Laura M. verfasserin aut Rivas, Samuel verfasserin aut Arts, Thomas verfasserin aut Enthalten in International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer Springer-Verlag, 1997 17(2013), 1 vom: 13. Apr., Seite 1-16 (DE-627)SPR008001103 nnns volume:17 year:2013 number:1 day:13 month:04 pages:1-16 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10009-013-0275-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 17 2013 1 13 04 1-16 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10009-013-0275-0 doi (DE-627)SPR008006180 (SPR)s10009-013-0275-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Nilsson, Agneta verfasserin aut Assessing the effects of introducing a new software development process: a methodological description 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract In this article, we report from a 22-months long action research study in which we evaluate the usefulness of a set of software development tools in an industrial setting, a small software company. We focus on how developers in the industry use and adopt these tools, what expectations they have on them, how the tools can be improved, and how the adoption process itself can be improved. We describe these change processes from a methodological perspective, how we monitored the processes, how we reviewed the outcomes, and the strategies that we applied. We show how the processes evolved, intermediate results, and the steps that were taken along the way based on the outcomes. We believe that the described study may inspire other tool-developers and/or researchers to organize similar studies to further our understanding of the complex processes involved in the adoption of software development tools in industry. Software development process (dpeaa)DE-He213 Process improvement (dpeaa)DE-He213 Process change (dpeaa)DE-He213 Change assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Castro, Laura M. verfasserin aut Rivas, Samuel verfasserin aut Arts, Thomas verfasserin aut Enthalten in International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer Springer-Verlag, 1997 17(2013), 1 vom: 13. Apr., Seite 1-16 (DE-627)SPR008001103 nnns volume:17 year:2013 number:1 day:13 month:04 pages:1-16 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10009-013-0275-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 17 2013 1 13 04 1-16 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10009-013-0275-0 doi (DE-627)SPR008006180 (SPR)s10009-013-0275-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Nilsson, Agneta verfasserin aut Assessing the effects of introducing a new software development process: a methodological description 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract In this article, we report from a 22-months long action research study in which we evaluate the usefulness of a set of software development tools in an industrial setting, a small software company. We focus on how developers in the industry use and adopt these tools, what expectations they have on them, how the tools can be improved, and how the adoption process itself can be improved. We describe these change processes from a methodological perspective, how we monitored the processes, how we reviewed the outcomes, and the strategies that we applied. We show how the processes evolved, intermediate results, and the steps that were taken along the way based on the outcomes. We believe that the described study may inspire other tool-developers and/or researchers to organize similar studies to further our understanding of the complex processes involved in the adoption of software development tools in industry. Software development process (dpeaa)DE-He213 Process improvement (dpeaa)DE-He213 Process change (dpeaa)DE-He213 Change assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Castro, Laura M. verfasserin aut Rivas, Samuel verfasserin aut Arts, Thomas verfasserin aut Enthalten in International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer Springer-Verlag, 1997 17(2013), 1 vom: 13. Apr., Seite 1-16 (DE-627)SPR008001103 nnns volume:17 year:2013 number:1 day:13 month:04 pages:1-16 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10009-013-0275-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 17 2013 1 13 04 1-16 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer 17(2013), 1 vom: 13. Apr., Seite 1-16 volume:17 year:2013 number:1 day:13 month:04 pages:1-16 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer 17(2013), 1 vom: 13. Apr., Seite 1-16 volume:17 year:2013 number:1 day:13 month:04 pages:1-16 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Software development process Process improvement Process change Change assessment |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Nilsson, Agneta @@aut@@ Castro, Laura M. @@aut@@ Rivas, Samuel @@aut@@ Arts, Thomas @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2013-04-13T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
SPR008001103 |
id |
SPR008006180 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR008006180</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20201124023051.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201005s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10009-013-0275-0</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR008006180</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s10009-013-0275-0-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nilsson, Agneta</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Assessing the effects of introducing a new software development process: a methodological description</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract In this article, we report from a 22-months long action research study in which we evaluate the usefulness of a set of software development tools in an industrial setting, a small software company. We focus on how developers in the industry use and adopt these tools, what expectations they have on them, how the tools can be improved, and how the adoption process itself can be improved. We describe these change processes from a methodological perspective, how we monitored the processes, how we reviewed the outcomes, and the strategies that we applied. We show how the processes evolved, intermediate results, and the steps that were taken along the way based on the outcomes. We believe that the described study may inspire other tool-developers and/or researchers to organize similar studies to further our understanding of the complex processes involved in the adoption of software development tools in industry.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Software development process</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Process improvement</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Process change</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Change assessment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Castro, Laura M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rivas, Samuel</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arts, Thomas</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1997</subfield><subfield code="g">17(2013), 1 vom: 13. Apr., Seite 1-16</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR008001103</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:17</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:13</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1-16</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10009-013-0275-0</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">17</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">13</subfield><subfield code="c">04</subfield><subfield code="h">1-16</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Nilsson, Agneta |
spellingShingle |
Nilsson, Agneta misc Software development process misc Process improvement misc Process change misc Change assessment Assessing the effects of introducing a new software development process: a methodological description |
authorStr |
Nilsson, Agneta |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR008001103 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
collection |
springer |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
Assessing the effects of introducing a new software development process: a methodological description Software development process (dpeaa)DE-He213 Process improvement (dpeaa)DE-He213 Process change (dpeaa)DE-He213 Change assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
topic |
misc Software development process misc Process improvement misc Process change misc Change assessment |
topic_unstemmed |
misc Software development process misc Process improvement misc Process change misc Change assessment |
topic_browse |
misc Software development process misc Process improvement misc Process change misc Change assessment |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer |
hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR008001103 |
hierarchy_top_title |
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR008001103 |
title |
Assessing the effects of introducing a new software development process: a methodological description |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR008006180 (SPR)s10009-013-0275-0-e |
title_full |
Assessing the effects of introducing a new software development process: a methodological description |
author_sort |
Nilsson, Agneta |
journal |
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer |
journalStr |
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2013 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
1 |
author_browse |
Nilsson, Agneta Castro, Laura M. Rivas, Samuel Arts, Thomas |
container_volume |
17 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Nilsson, Agneta |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10009-013-0275-0 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
assessing the effects of introducing a new software development process: a methodological description |
title_auth |
Assessing the effects of introducing a new software development process: a methodological description |
abstract |
Abstract In this article, we report from a 22-months long action research study in which we evaluate the usefulness of a set of software development tools in an industrial setting, a small software company. We focus on how developers in the industry use and adopt these tools, what expectations they have on them, how the tools can be improved, and how the adoption process itself can be improved. We describe these change processes from a methodological perspective, how we monitored the processes, how we reviewed the outcomes, and the strategies that we applied. We show how the processes evolved, intermediate results, and the steps that were taken along the way based on the outcomes. We believe that the described study may inspire other tool-developers and/or researchers to organize similar studies to further our understanding of the complex processes involved in the adoption of software development tools in industry. |
abstractGer |
Abstract In this article, we report from a 22-months long action research study in which we evaluate the usefulness of a set of software development tools in an industrial setting, a small software company. We focus on how developers in the industry use and adopt these tools, what expectations they have on them, how the tools can be improved, and how the adoption process itself can be improved. We describe these change processes from a methodological perspective, how we monitored the processes, how we reviewed the outcomes, and the strategies that we applied. We show how the processes evolved, intermediate results, and the steps that were taken along the way based on the outcomes. We believe that the described study may inspire other tool-developers and/or researchers to organize similar studies to further our understanding of the complex processes involved in the adoption of software development tools in industry. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract In this article, we report from a 22-months long action research study in which we evaluate the usefulness of a set of software development tools in an industrial setting, a small software company. We focus on how developers in the industry use and adopt these tools, what expectations they have on them, how the tools can be improved, and how the adoption process itself can be improved. We describe these change processes from a methodological perspective, how we monitored the processes, how we reviewed the outcomes, and the strategies that we applied. We show how the processes evolved, intermediate results, and the steps that were taken along the way based on the outcomes. We believe that the described study may inspire other tool-developers and/or researchers to organize similar studies to further our understanding of the complex processes involved in the adoption of software development tools in industry. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
container_issue |
1 |
title_short |
Assessing the effects of introducing a new software development process: a methodological description |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10009-013-0275-0 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Castro, Laura M. Rivas, Samuel Arts, Thomas |
author2Str |
Castro, Laura M. Rivas, Samuel Arts, Thomas |
ppnlink |
SPR008001103 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s10009-013-0275-0 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T16:43:08.316Z |
_version_ |
1803576922151583745 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR008006180</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20201124023051.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201005s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10009-013-0275-0</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR008006180</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s10009-013-0275-0-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nilsson, Agneta</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Assessing the effects of introducing a new software development process: a methodological description</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract In this article, we report from a 22-months long action research study in which we evaluate the usefulness of a set of software development tools in an industrial setting, a small software company. We focus on how developers in the industry use and adopt these tools, what expectations they have on them, how the tools can be improved, and how the adoption process itself can be improved. We describe these change processes from a methodological perspective, how we monitored the processes, how we reviewed the outcomes, and the strategies that we applied. We show how the processes evolved, intermediate results, and the steps that were taken along the way based on the outcomes. We believe that the described study may inspire other tool-developers and/or researchers to organize similar studies to further our understanding of the complex processes involved in the adoption of software development tools in industry.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Software development process</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Process improvement</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Process change</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Change assessment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Castro, Laura M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rivas, Samuel</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arts, Thomas</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1997</subfield><subfield code="g">17(2013), 1 vom: 13. Apr., Seite 1-16</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR008001103</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:17</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:13</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1-16</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10009-013-0275-0</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">17</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">13</subfield><subfield code="c">04</subfield><subfield code="h">1-16</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.398492 |