Effects of early life and current housing on sensitivity to reward loss in a successive negative contrast test in pigs
Abstract Animals in a negative affective state seem to be more sensitive to reward loss, i.e. an unexpected decrease in reward size. The aim of this study was to investigate whether early-life and current enriched vs. barren housing conditions affect the sensitivity to reward loss in pigs using a su...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Luo, L. [verfasserIn] Reimert, I. [verfasserIn] Graat, E. A. M. [verfasserIn] Smeets, S. [verfasserIn] Kemp, B. [verfasserIn] Bolhuis, J. E. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2019 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Animal Cognition - Springer-Verlag, 1998, 23(2019), 1 vom: 13. Nov., Seite 121-130 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:23 ; year:2019 ; number:1 ; day:13 ; month:11 ; pages:121-130 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10071-019-01322-w |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR008580715 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR008580715 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20201124045121.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201005s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10071-019-01322-w |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR008580715 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s10071-019-01322-w-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Luo, L. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effects of early life and current housing on sensitivity to reward loss in a successive negative contrast test in pigs |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Animals in a negative affective state seem to be more sensitive to reward loss, i.e. an unexpected decrease in reward size. The aim of this study was to investigate whether early-life and current enriched vs. barren housing conditions affect the sensitivity to reward loss in pigs using a successive negative contrast test. Pigs (n = 64 from 32 pens) were housed in barren or enriched conditions from birth onwards, and at 7 weeks of age experienced either a switch in housing conditions (from barren to enriched or vice versa) or not. Allotting pigs to the different treatments was balanced for coping style (proactive vs. reactive). One pig per pen was trained to run for a large reward and one for a small reward. Reward loss was introduced for pigs receiving the large reward after 11 days (reward downshift), i.e. from then onwards, they received the small reward. Pigs housed in barren conditions throughout life generally had a lower probability and higher latency to get the reward than other pigs. Proactive pigs ran overall slower than reactive pigs. After the reward downshift, all pigs ran slower. Nevertheless, reward downshift increased the latency and reduced the probability to get to the reward, but only in pigs exposed to barren conditions in early life, which thus were more sensitive to reward loss than pigs from enriched early life housing. In conclusion, barren housed pigs seemed overall less motivated for the reward, and early life housing conditions had long-term effects on the sensitivity to reward loss. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Pigs |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Enrichment |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Early life |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Reward loss |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Coping style |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Affective state |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Reimert, I. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Graat, E. A. M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Smeets, S. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kemp, B. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bolhuis, J. E. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Animal Cognition |d Springer-Verlag, 1998 |g 23(2019), 1 vom: 13. Nov., Seite 121-130 |w (DE-627)SPR008564442 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:23 |g year:2019 |g number:1 |g day:13 |g month:11 |g pages:121-130 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01322-w |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 23 |j 2019 |e 1 |b 13 |c 11 |h 121-130 | ||
| author_variant |
l l ll i r ir e a m g eam eamg s s ss b k bk j e b je jeb |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
luolreimertigraateamsmeetsskempbbolhuisj:2019----:fetoeryiencretosnosniiiyoeadosnscesv |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10071-019-01322-w doi (DE-627)SPR008580715 (SPR)s10071-019-01322-w-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Luo, L. verfasserin aut Effects of early life and current housing on sensitivity to reward loss in a successive negative contrast test in pigs 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Animals in a negative affective state seem to be more sensitive to reward loss, i.e. an unexpected decrease in reward size. The aim of this study was to investigate whether early-life and current enriched vs. barren housing conditions affect the sensitivity to reward loss in pigs using a successive negative contrast test. Pigs (n = 64 from 32 pens) were housed in barren or enriched conditions from birth onwards, and at 7 weeks of age experienced either a switch in housing conditions (from barren to enriched or vice versa) or not. Allotting pigs to the different treatments was balanced for coping style (proactive vs. reactive). One pig per pen was trained to run for a large reward and one for a small reward. Reward loss was introduced for pigs receiving the large reward after 11 days (reward downshift), i.e. from then onwards, they received the small reward. Pigs housed in barren conditions throughout life generally had a lower probability and higher latency to get the reward than other pigs. Proactive pigs ran overall slower than reactive pigs. After the reward downshift, all pigs ran slower. Nevertheless, reward downshift increased the latency and reduced the probability to get to the reward, but only in pigs exposed to barren conditions in early life, which thus were more sensitive to reward loss than pigs from enriched early life housing. In conclusion, barren housed pigs seemed overall less motivated for the reward, and early life housing conditions had long-term effects on the sensitivity to reward loss. Pigs (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enrichment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Early life (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reward loss (dpeaa)DE-He213 Coping style (dpeaa)DE-He213 Affective state (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reimert, I. verfasserin aut Graat, E. A. M. verfasserin aut Smeets, S. verfasserin aut Kemp, B. verfasserin aut Bolhuis, J. E. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Animal Cognition Springer-Verlag, 1998 23(2019), 1 vom: 13. Nov., Seite 121-130 (DE-627)SPR008564442 nnns volume:23 year:2019 number:1 day:13 month:11 pages:121-130 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01322-w kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 23 2019 1 13 11 121-130 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10071-019-01322-w doi (DE-627)SPR008580715 (SPR)s10071-019-01322-w-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Luo, L. verfasserin aut Effects of early life and current housing on sensitivity to reward loss in a successive negative contrast test in pigs 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Animals in a negative affective state seem to be more sensitive to reward loss, i.e. an unexpected decrease in reward size. The aim of this study was to investigate whether early-life and current enriched vs. barren housing conditions affect the sensitivity to reward loss in pigs using a successive negative contrast test. Pigs (n = 64 from 32 pens) were housed in barren or enriched conditions from birth onwards, and at 7 weeks of age experienced either a switch in housing conditions (from barren to enriched or vice versa) or not. Allotting pigs to the different treatments was balanced for coping style (proactive vs. reactive). One pig per pen was trained to run for a large reward and one for a small reward. Reward loss was introduced for pigs receiving the large reward after 11 days (reward downshift), i.e. from then onwards, they received the small reward. Pigs housed in barren conditions throughout life generally had a lower probability and higher latency to get the reward than other pigs. Proactive pigs ran overall slower than reactive pigs. After the reward downshift, all pigs ran slower. Nevertheless, reward downshift increased the latency and reduced the probability to get to the reward, but only in pigs exposed to barren conditions in early life, which thus were more sensitive to reward loss than pigs from enriched early life housing. In conclusion, barren housed pigs seemed overall less motivated for the reward, and early life housing conditions had long-term effects on the sensitivity to reward loss. Pigs (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enrichment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Early life (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reward loss (dpeaa)DE-He213 Coping style (dpeaa)DE-He213 Affective state (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reimert, I. verfasserin aut Graat, E. A. M. verfasserin aut Smeets, S. verfasserin aut Kemp, B. verfasserin aut Bolhuis, J. E. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Animal Cognition Springer-Verlag, 1998 23(2019), 1 vom: 13. Nov., Seite 121-130 (DE-627)SPR008564442 nnns volume:23 year:2019 number:1 day:13 month:11 pages:121-130 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01322-w kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 23 2019 1 13 11 121-130 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10071-019-01322-w doi (DE-627)SPR008580715 (SPR)s10071-019-01322-w-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Luo, L. verfasserin aut Effects of early life and current housing on sensitivity to reward loss in a successive negative contrast test in pigs 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Animals in a negative affective state seem to be more sensitive to reward loss, i.e. an unexpected decrease in reward size. The aim of this study was to investigate whether early-life and current enriched vs. barren housing conditions affect the sensitivity to reward loss in pigs using a successive negative contrast test. Pigs (n = 64 from 32 pens) were housed in barren or enriched conditions from birth onwards, and at 7 weeks of age experienced either a switch in housing conditions (from barren to enriched or vice versa) or not. Allotting pigs to the different treatments was balanced for coping style (proactive vs. reactive). One pig per pen was trained to run for a large reward and one for a small reward. Reward loss was introduced for pigs receiving the large reward after 11 days (reward downshift), i.e. from then onwards, they received the small reward. Pigs housed in barren conditions throughout life generally had a lower probability and higher latency to get the reward than other pigs. Proactive pigs ran overall slower than reactive pigs. After the reward downshift, all pigs ran slower. Nevertheless, reward downshift increased the latency and reduced the probability to get to the reward, but only in pigs exposed to barren conditions in early life, which thus were more sensitive to reward loss than pigs from enriched early life housing. In conclusion, barren housed pigs seemed overall less motivated for the reward, and early life housing conditions had long-term effects on the sensitivity to reward loss. Pigs (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enrichment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Early life (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reward loss (dpeaa)DE-He213 Coping style (dpeaa)DE-He213 Affective state (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reimert, I. verfasserin aut Graat, E. A. M. verfasserin aut Smeets, S. verfasserin aut Kemp, B. verfasserin aut Bolhuis, J. E. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Animal Cognition Springer-Verlag, 1998 23(2019), 1 vom: 13. Nov., Seite 121-130 (DE-627)SPR008564442 nnns volume:23 year:2019 number:1 day:13 month:11 pages:121-130 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01322-w kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 23 2019 1 13 11 121-130 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10071-019-01322-w doi (DE-627)SPR008580715 (SPR)s10071-019-01322-w-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Luo, L. verfasserin aut Effects of early life and current housing on sensitivity to reward loss in a successive negative contrast test in pigs 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Animals in a negative affective state seem to be more sensitive to reward loss, i.e. an unexpected decrease in reward size. The aim of this study was to investigate whether early-life and current enriched vs. barren housing conditions affect the sensitivity to reward loss in pigs using a successive negative contrast test. Pigs (n = 64 from 32 pens) were housed in barren or enriched conditions from birth onwards, and at 7 weeks of age experienced either a switch in housing conditions (from barren to enriched or vice versa) or not. Allotting pigs to the different treatments was balanced for coping style (proactive vs. reactive). One pig per pen was trained to run for a large reward and one for a small reward. Reward loss was introduced for pigs receiving the large reward after 11 days (reward downshift), i.e. from then onwards, they received the small reward. Pigs housed in barren conditions throughout life generally had a lower probability and higher latency to get the reward than other pigs. Proactive pigs ran overall slower than reactive pigs. After the reward downshift, all pigs ran slower. Nevertheless, reward downshift increased the latency and reduced the probability to get to the reward, but only in pigs exposed to barren conditions in early life, which thus were more sensitive to reward loss than pigs from enriched early life housing. In conclusion, barren housed pigs seemed overall less motivated for the reward, and early life housing conditions had long-term effects on the sensitivity to reward loss. Pigs (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enrichment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Early life (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reward loss (dpeaa)DE-He213 Coping style (dpeaa)DE-He213 Affective state (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reimert, I. verfasserin aut Graat, E. A. M. verfasserin aut Smeets, S. verfasserin aut Kemp, B. verfasserin aut Bolhuis, J. E. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Animal Cognition Springer-Verlag, 1998 23(2019), 1 vom: 13. Nov., Seite 121-130 (DE-627)SPR008564442 nnns volume:23 year:2019 number:1 day:13 month:11 pages:121-130 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01322-w kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 23 2019 1 13 11 121-130 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10071-019-01322-w doi (DE-627)SPR008580715 (SPR)s10071-019-01322-w-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Luo, L. verfasserin aut Effects of early life and current housing on sensitivity to reward loss in a successive negative contrast test in pigs 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Animals in a negative affective state seem to be more sensitive to reward loss, i.e. an unexpected decrease in reward size. The aim of this study was to investigate whether early-life and current enriched vs. barren housing conditions affect the sensitivity to reward loss in pigs using a successive negative contrast test. Pigs (n = 64 from 32 pens) were housed in barren or enriched conditions from birth onwards, and at 7 weeks of age experienced either a switch in housing conditions (from barren to enriched or vice versa) or not. Allotting pigs to the different treatments was balanced for coping style (proactive vs. reactive). One pig per pen was trained to run for a large reward and one for a small reward. Reward loss was introduced for pigs receiving the large reward after 11 days (reward downshift), i.e. from then onwards, they received the small reward. Pigs housed in barren conditions throughout life generally had a lower probability and higher latency to get the reward than other pigs. Proactive pigs ran overall slower than reactive pigs. After the reward downshift, all pigs ran slower. Nevertheless, reward downshift increased the latency and reduced the probability to get to the reward, but only in pigs exposed to barren conditions in early life, which thus were more sensitive to reward loss than pigs from enriched early life housing. In conclusion, barren housed pigs seemed overall less motivated for the reward, and early life housing conditions had long-term effects on the sensitivity to reward loss. Pigs (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enrichment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Early life (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reward loss (dpeaa)DE-He213 Coping style (dpeaa)DE-He213 Affective state (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reimert, I. verfasserin aut Graat, E. A. M. verfasserin aut Smeets, S. verfasserin aut Kemp, B. verfasserin aut Bolhuis, J. E. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Animal Cognition Springer-Verlag, 1998 23(2019), 1 vom: 13. Nov., Seite 121-130 (DE-627)SPR008564442 nnns volume:23 year:2019 number:1 day:13 month:11 pages:121-130 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01322-w kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 23 2019 1 13 11 121-130 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Animal Cognition 23(2019), 1 vom: 13. Nov., Seite 121-130 volume:23 year:2019 number:1 day:13 month:11 pages:121-130 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Animal Cognition 23(2019), 1 vom: 13. Nov., Seite 121-130 volume:23 year:2019 number:1 day:13 month:11 pages:121-130 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Pigs Enrichment Early life Reward loss Coping style Affective state |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Animal Cognition |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Luo, L. @@aut@@ Reimert, I. @@aut@@ Graat, E. A. M. @@aut@@ Smeets, S. @@aut@@ Kemp, B. @@aut@@ Bolhuis, J. E. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-11-13T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR008564442 |
| id |
SPR008580715 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR008580715</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20201124045121.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201005s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10071-019-01322-w</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR008580715</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s10071-019-01322-w-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Luo, L.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Effects of early life and current housing on sensitivity to reward loss in a successive negative contrast test in pigs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Animals in a negative affective state seem to be more sensitive to reward loss, i.e. an unexpected decrease in reward size. The aim of this study was to investigate whether early-life and current enriched vs. barren housing conditions affect the sensitivity to reward loss in pigs using a successive negative contrast test. Pigs (n = 64 from 32 pens) were housed in barren or enriched conditions from birth onwards, and at 7 weeks of age experienced either a switch in housing conditions (from barren to enriched or vice versa) or not. Allotting pigs to the different treatments was balanced for coping style (proactive vs. reactive). One pig per pen was trained to run for a large reward and one for a small reward. Reward loss was introduced for pigs receiving the large reward after 11 days (reward downshift), i.e. from then onwards, they received the small reward. Pigs housed in barren conditions throughout life generally had a lower probability and higher latency to get the reward than other pigs. Proactive pigs ran overall slower than reactive pigs. After the reward downshift, all pigs ran slower. Nevertheless, reward downshift increased the latency and reduced the probability to get to the reward, but only in pigs exposed to barren conditions in early life, which thus were more sensitive to reward loss than pigs from enriched early life housing. In conclusion, barren housed pigs seemed overall less motivated for the reward, and early life housing conditions had long-term effects on the sensitivity to reward loss.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pigs</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Early life</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reward loss</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Coping style</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Affective state</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Reimert, I.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Graat, E. A. M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Smeets, S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kemp, B.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bolhuis, J. E.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Animal Cognition</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">23(2019), 1 vom: 13. Nov., Seite 121-130</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR008564442</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:23</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:13</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:121-130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01322-w</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">23</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">13</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">121-130</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Luo, L. |
| spellingShingle |
Luo, L. misc Pigs misc Enrichment misc Early life misc Reward loss misc Coping style misc Affective state Effects of early life and current housing on sensitivity to reward loss in a successive negative contrast test in pigs |
| authorStr |
Luo, L. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR008564442 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Effects of early life and current housing on sensitivity to reward loss in a successive negative contrast test in pigs Pigs (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enrichment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Early life (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reward loss (dpeaa)DE-He213 Coping style (dpeaa)DE-He213 Affective state (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Pigs misc Enrichment misc Early life misc Reward loss misc Coping style misc Affective state |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Pigs misc Enrichment misc Early life misc Reward loss misc Coping style misc Affective state |
| topic_browse |
misc Pigs misc Enrichment misc Early life misc Reward loss misc Coping style misc Affective state |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Animal Cognition |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR008564442 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Animal Cognition |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR008564442 |
| title |
Effects of early life and current housing on sensitivity to reward loss in a successive negative contrast test in pigs |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR008580715 (SPR)s10071-019-01322-w-e |
| title_full |
Effects of early life and current housing on sensitivity to reward loss in a successive negative contrast test in pigs |
| author_sort |
Luo, L. |
| journal |
Animal Cognition |
| journalStr |
Animal Cognition |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2019 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
121 |
| author_browse |
Luo, L. Reimert, I. Graat, E. A. M. Smeets, S. Kemp, B. Bolhuis, J. E. |
| container_volume |
23 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Luo, L. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10071-019-01322-w |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
effects of early life and current housing on sensitivity to reward loss in a successive negative contrast test in pigs |
| title_auth |
Effects of early life and current housing on sensitivity to reward loss in a successive negative contrast test in pigs |
| abstract |
Abstract Animals in a negative affective state seem to be more sensitive to reward loss, i.e. an unexpected decrease in reward size. The aim of this study was to investigate whether early-life and current enriched vs. barren housing conditions affect the sensitivity to reward loss in pigs using a successive negative contrast test. Pigs (n = 64 from 32 pens) were housed in barren or enriched conditions from birth onwards, and at 7 weeks of age experienced either a switch in housing conditions (from barren to enriched or vice versa) or not. Allotting pigs to the different treatments was balanced for coping style (proactive vs. reactive). One pig per pen was trained to run for a large reward and one for a small reward. Reward loss was introduced for pigs receiving the large reward after 11 days (reward downshift), i.e. from then onwards, they received the small reward. Pigs housed in barren conditions throughout life generally had a lower probability and higher latency to get the reward than other pigs. Proactive pigs ran overall slower than reactive pigs. After the reward downshift, all pigs ran slower. Nevertheless, reward downshift increased the latency and reduced the probability to get to the reward, but only in pigs exposed to barren conditions in early life, which thus were more sensitive to reward loss than pigs from enriched early life housing. In conclusion, barren housed pigs seemed overall less motivated for the reward, and early life housing conditions had long-term effects on the sensitivity to reward loss. |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Animals in a negative affective state seem to be more sensitive to reward loss, i.e. an unexpected decrease in reward size. The aim of this study was to investigate whether early-life and current enriched vs. barren housing conditions affect the sensitivity to reward loss in pigs using a successive negative contrast test. Pigs (n = 64 from 32 pens) were housed in barren or enriched conditions from birth onwards, and at 7 weeks of age experienced either a switch in housing conditions (from barren to enriched or vice versa) or not. Allotting pigs to the different treatments was balanced for coping style (proactive vs. reactive). One pig per pen was trained to run for a large reward and one for a small reward. Reward loss was introduced for pigs receiving the large reward after 11 days (reward downshift), i.e. from then onwards, they received the small reward. Pigs housed in barren conditions throughout life generally had a lower probability and higher latency to get the reward than other pigs. Proactive pigs ran overall slower than reactive pigs. After the reward downshift, all pigs ran slower. Nevertheless, reward downshift increased the latency and reduced the probability to get to the reward, but only in pigs exposed to barren conditions in early life, which thus were more sensitive to reward loss than pigs from enriched early life housing. In conclusion, barren housed pigs seemed overall less motivated for the reward, and early life housing conditions had long-term effects on the sensitivity to reward loss. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Animals in a negative affective state seem to be more sensitive to reward loss, i.e. an unexpected decrease in reward size. The aim of this study was to investigate whether early-life and current enriched vs. barren housing conditions affect the sensitivity to reward loss in pigs using a successive negative contrast test. Pigs (n = 64 from 32 pens) were housed in barren or enriched conditions from birth onwards, and at 7 weeks of age experienced either a switch in housing conditions (from barren to enriched or vice versa) or not. Allotting pigs to the different treatments was balanced for coping style (proactive vs. reactive). One pig per pen was trained to run for a large reward and one for a small reward. Reward loss was introduced for pigs receiving the large reward after 11 days (reward downshift), i.e. from then onwards, they received the small reward. Pigs housed in barren conditions throughout life generally had a lower probability and higher latency to get the reward than other pigs. Proactive pigs ran overall slower than reactive pigs. After the reward downshift, all pigs ran slower. Nevertheless, reward downshift increased the latency and reduced the probability to get to the reward, but only in pigs exposed to barren conditions in early life, which thus were more sensitive to reward loss than pigs from enriched early life housing. In conclusion, barren housed pigs seemed overall less motivated for the reward, and early life housing conditions had long-term effects on the sensitivity to reward loss. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Effects of early life and current housing on sensitivity to reward loss in a successive negative contrast test in pigs |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01322-w |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Reimert, I. Graat, E. A. M. Smeets, S. Kemp, B. Bolhuis, J. E. |
| author2Str |
Reimert, I. Graat, E. A. M. Smeets, S. Kemp, B. Bolhuis, J. E. |
| ppnlink |
SPR008564442 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10071-019-01322-w |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T21:57:17.242Z |
| _version_ |
1803596686680915968 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR008580715</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20201124045121.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201005s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10071-019-01322-w</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR008580715</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s10071-019-01322-w-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Luo, L.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Effects of early life and current housing on sensitivity to reward loss in a successive negative contrast test in pigs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Animals in a negative affective state seem to be more sensitive to reward loss, i.e. an unexpected decrease in reward size. The aim of this study was to investigate whether early-life and current enriched vs. barren housing conditions affect the sensitivity to reward loss in pigs using a successive negative contrast test. Pigs (n = 64 from 32 pens) were housed in barren or enriched conditions from birth onwards, and at 7 weeks of age experienced either a switch in housing conditions (from barren to enriched or vice versa) or not. Allotting pigs to the different treatments was balanced for coping style (proactive vs. reactive). One pig per pen was trained to run for a large reward and one for a small reward. Reward loss was introduced for pigs receiving the large reward after 11 days (reward downshift), i.e. from then onwards, they received the small reward. Pigs housed in barren conditions throughout life generally had a lower probability and higher latency to get the reward than other pigs. Proactive pigs ran overall slower than reactive pigs. After the reward downshift, all pigs ran slower. Nevertheless, reward downshift increased the latency and reduced the probability to get to the reward, but only in pigs exposed to barren conditions in early life, which thus were more sensitive to reward loss than pigs from enriched early life housing. In conclusion, barren housed pigs seemed overall less motivated for the reward, and early life housing conditions had long-term effects on the sensitivity to reward loss.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pigs</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Early life</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reward loss</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Coping style</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Affective state</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Reimert, I.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Graat, E. A. M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Smeets, S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kemp, B.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bolhuis, J. E.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Animal Cognition</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">23(2019), 1 vom: 13. Nov., Seite 121-130</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR008564442</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:23</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:13</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:121-130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01322-w</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">23</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">13</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">121-130</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400342 |