Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance
Abstract The concept of ecosystem services (ES) is being increasingly applied in environmental governance and science. To safeguard key ES in changing and complex social–ecological systems such as treeline areas, we need to (1) map key ES in different types of treeline landscapes, (2) identify the s...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Sarkki, Simo [verfasserIn] Ficko, Andrej [verfasserIn] Grunewald, Karsten [verfasserIn] Nijnik, Maria [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Regional Environmental Change - Springer-Verlag, 2001, 16(2015), 7 vom: 12. Mai, Seite 2019-2032 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:16 ; year:2015 ; number:7 ; day:12 ; month:05 ; pages:2019-2032 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10113-015-0812-3 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR008818924 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR008818924 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20201124052123.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201005s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10113-015-0812-3 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR008818924 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s10113-015-0812-3-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sarkki, Simo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract The concept of ecosystem services (ES) is being increasingly applied in environmental governance and science. To safeguard key ES in changing and complex social–ecological systems such as treeline areas, we need to (1) map key ES in different types of treeline landscapes, (2) identify the stakeholders benefiting from and threatening ES, and (3) examine how ES could be governed more sustainably. We explore these questions in European treeline areas by using quantitative and qualitative social science techniques to analyse responses from a survey of local scientific experts in 20 altitudinal and polar treeline areas in 15 European countries. In contrast to the prevalent consideration of treeline areas as a single type of a social–ecological system, we show that European treeline areas can be divided into two types that significantly differ in the delivery of ES. Our analyses allowed us to categorize stakeholders according to their benefits from and threats to ES; “Green key players” formed the most numerous group, while smaller number of stakeholder groups was categorized as “Harmless crowd”, “Occasional stressors”, and “Risky users”. However, behaviour of stakeholders is very much site-specific. Of 595 pairs of stakeholders analysed, we found <5 EU-wide “Allies” and “Opponents”. Recommendations for improved governance include adjusting governance instruments to specific problems in divergent treeline systems and creating participatory structures where stakeholders better interact with scientists and can genuinely influence management decisions. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Treeline ecotone |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mountain ecosystems |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cultural ecosystem services |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Expert assessment |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Stakeholder analysis |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ficko, Andrej |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Grunewald, Karsten |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nijnik, Maria |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Regional Environmental Change |d Springer-Verlag, 2001 |g 16(2015), 7 vom: 12. Mai, Seite 2019-2032 |w (DE-627)SPR008808457 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2015 |g number:7 |g day:12 |g month:05 |g pages:2019-2032 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0812-3 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 16 |j 2015 |e 7 |b 12 |c 05 |h 2019-2032 | ||
| author_variant |
s s ss a f af k g kg m n mn |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
sarkkisimofickoandrejgrunewaldkarstennij:2015----:eeisrmntrasouoenreiecssesrieaepoaoytd |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10113-015-0812-3 doi (DE-627)SPR008818924 (SPR)s10113-015-0812-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Sarkki, Simo verfasserin aut Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract The concept of ecosystem services (ES) is being increasingly applied in environmental governance and science. To safeguard key ES in changing and complex social–ecological systems such as treeline areas, we need to (1) map key ES in different types of treeline landscapes, (2) identify the stakeholders benefiting from and threatening ES, and (3) examine how ES could be governed more sustainably. We explore these questions in European treeline areas by using quantitative and qualitative social science techniques to analyse responses from a survey of local scientific experts in 20 altitudinal and polar treeline areas in 15 European countries. In contrast to the prevalent consideration of treeline areas as a single type of a social–ecological system, we show that European treeline areas can be divided into two types that significantly differ in the delivery of ES. Our analyses allowed us to categorize stakeholders according to their benefits from and threats to ES; “Green key players” formed the most numerous group, while smaller number of stakeholder groups was categorized as “Harmless crowd”, “Occasional stressors”, and “Risky users”. However, behaviour of stakeholders is very much site-specific. Of 595 pairs of stakeholders analysed, we found <5 EU-wide “Allies” and “Opponents”. Recommendations for improved governance include adjusting governance instruments to specific problems in divergent treeline systems and creating participatory structures where stakeholders better interact with scientists and can genuinely influence management decisions. Treeline ecotone (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mountain ecosystems (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cultural ecosystem services (dpeaa)DE-He213 Expert assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Stakeholder analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ficko, Andrej verfasserin aut Grunewald, Karsten verfasserin aut Nijnik, Maria verfasserin aut Enthalten in Regional Environmental Change Springer-Verlag, 2001 16(2015), 7 vom: 12. Mai, Seite 2019-2032 (DE-627)SPR008808457 nnns volume:16 year:2015 number:7 day:12 month:05 pages:2019-2032 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0812-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 16 2015 7 12 05 2019-2032 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10113-015-0812-3 doi (DE-627)SPR008818924 (SPR)s10113-015-0812-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Sarkki, Simo verfasserin aut Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract The concept of ecosystem services (ES) is being increasingly applied in environmental governance and science. To safeguard key ES in changing and complex social–ecological systems such as treeline areas, we need to (1) map key ES in different types of treeline landscapes, (2) identify the stakeholders benefiting from and threatening ES, and (3) examine how ES could be governed more sustainably. We explore these questions in European treeline areas by using quantitative and qualitative social science techniques to analyse responses from a survey of local scientific experts in 20 altitudinal and polar treeline areas in 15 European countries. In contrast to the prevalent consideration of treeline areas as a single type of a social–ecological system, we show that European treeline areas can be divided into two types that significantly differ in the delivery of ES. Our analyses allowed us to categorize stakeholders according to their benefits from and threats to ES; “Green key players” formed the most numerous group, while smaller number of stakeholder groups was categorized as “Harmless crowd”, “Occasional stressors”, and “Risky users”. However, behaviour of stakeholders is very much site-specific. Of 595 pairs of stakeholders analysed, we found <5 EU-wide “Allies” and “Opponents”. Recommendations for improved governance include adjusting governance instruments to specific problems in divergent treeline systems and creating participatory structures where stakeholders better interact with scientists and can genuinely influence management decisions. Treeline ecotone (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mountain ecosystems (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cultural ecosystem services (dpeaa)DE-He213 Expert assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Stakeholder analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ficko, Andrej verfasserin aut Grunewald, Karsten verfasserin aut Nijnik, Maria verfasserin aut Enthalten in Regional Environmental Change Springer-Verlag, 2001 16(2015), 7 vom: 12. Mai, Seite 2019-2032 (DE-627)SPR008808457 nnns volume:16 year:2015 number:7 day:12 month:05 pages:2019-2032 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0812-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 16 2015 7 12 05 2019-2032 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10113-015-0812-3 doi (DE-627)SPR008818924 (SPR)s10113-015-0812-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Sarkki, Simo verfasserin aut Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract The concept of ecosystem services (ES) is being increasingly applied in environmental governance and science. To safeguard key ES in changing and complex social–ecological systems such as treeline areas, we need to (1) map key ES in different types of treeline landscapes, (2) identify the stakeholders benefiting from and threatening ES, and (3) examine how ES could be governed more sustainably. We explore these questions in European treeline areas by using quantitative and qualitative social science techniques to analyse responses from a survey of local scientific experts in 20 altitudinal and polar treeline areas in 15 European countries. In contrast to the prevalent consideration of treeline areas as a single type of a social–ecological system, we show that European treeline areas can be divided into two types that significantly differ in the delivery of ES. Our analyses allowed us to categorize stakeholders according to their benefits from and threats to ES; “Green key players” formed the most numerous group, while smaller number of stakeholder groups was categorized as “Harmless crowd”, “Occasional stressors”, and “Risky users”. However, behaviour of stakeholders is very much site-specific. Of 595 pairs of stakeholders analysed, we found <5 EU-wide “Allies” and “Opponents”. Recommendations for improved governance include adjusting governance instruments to specific problems in divergent treeline systems and creating participatory structures where stakeholders better interact with scientists and can genuinely influence management decisions. Treeline ecotone (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mountain ecosystems (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cultural ecosystem services (dpeaa)DE-He213 Expert assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Stakeholder analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ficko, Andrej verfasserin aut Grunewald, Karsten verfasserin aut Nijnik, Maria verfasserin aut Enthalten in Regional Environmental Change Springer-Verlag, 2001 16(2015), 7 vom: 12. Mai, Seite 2019-2032 (DE-627)SPR008808457 nnns volume:16 year:2015 number:7 day:12 month:05 pages:2019-2032 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0812-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 16 2015 7 12 05 2019-2032 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10113-015-0812-3 doi (DE-627)SPR008818924 (SPR)s10113-015-0812-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Sarkki, Simo verfasserin aut Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract The concept of ecosystem services (ES) is being increasingly applied in environmental governance and science. To safeguard key ES in changing and complex social–ecological systems such as treeline areas, we need to (1) map key ES in different types of treeline landscapes, (2) identify the stakeholders benefiting from and threatening ES, and (3) examine how ES could be governed more sustainably. We explore these questions in European treeline areas by using quantitative and qualitative social science techniques to analyse responses from a survey of local scientific experts in 20 altitudinal and polar treeline areas in 15 European countries. In contrast to the prevalent consideration of treeline areas as a single type of a social–ecological system, we show that European treeline areas can be divided into two types that significantly differ in the delivery of ES. Our analyses allowed us to categorize stakeholders according to their benefits from and threats to ES; “Green key players” formed the most numerous group, while smaller number of stakeholder groups was categorized as “Harmless crowd”, “Occasional stressors”, and “Risky users”. However, behaviour of stakeholders is very much site-specific. Of 595 pairs of stakeholders analysed, we found <5 EU-wide “Allies” and “Opponents”. Recommendations for improved governance include adjusting governance instruments to specific problems in divergent treeline systems and creating participatory structures where stakeholders better interact with scientists and can genuinely influence management decisions. Treeline ecotone (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mountain ecosystems (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cultural ecosystem services (dpeaa)DE-He213 Expert assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Stakeholder analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ficko, Andrej verfasserin aut Grunewald, Karsten verfasserin aut Nijnik, Maria verfasserin aut Enthalten in Regional Environmental Change Springer-Verlag, 2001 16(2015), 7 vom: 12. Mai, Seite 2019-2032 (DE-627)SPR008808457 nnns volume:16 year:2015 number:7 day:12 month:05 pages:2019-2032 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0812-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 16 2015 7 12 05 2019-2032 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10113-015-0812-3 doi (DE-627)SPR008818924 (SPR)s10113-015-0812-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Sarkki, Simo verfasserin aut Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract The concept of ecosystem services (ES) is being increasingly applied in environmental governance and science. To safeguard key ES in changing and complex social–ecological systems such as treeline areas, we need to (1) map key ES in different types of treeline landscapes, (2) identify the stakeholders benefiting from and threatening ES, and (3) examine how ES could be governed more sustainably. We explore these questions in European treeline areas by using quantitative and qualitative social science techniques to analyse responses from a survey of local scientific experts in 20 altitudinal and polar treeline areas in 15 European countries. In contrast to the prevalent consideration of treeline areas as a single type of a social–ecological system, we show that European treeline areas can be divided into two types that significantly differ in the delivery of ES. Our analyses allowed us to categorize stakeholders according to their benefits from and threats to ES; “Green key players” formed the most numerous group, while smaller number of stakeholder groups was categorized as “Harmless crowd”, “Occasional stressors”, and “Risky users”. However, behaviour of stakeholders is very much site-specific. Of 595 pairs of stakeholders analysed, we found <5 EU-wide “Allies” and “Opponents”. Recommendations for improved governance include adjusting governance instruments to specific problems in divergent treeline systems and creating participatory structures where stakeholders better interact with scientists and can genuinely influence management decisions. Treeline ecotone (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mountain ecosystems (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cultural ecosystem services (dpeaa)DE-He213 Expert assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Stakeholder analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ficko, Andrej verfasserin aut Grunewald, Karsten verfasserin aut Nijnik, Maria verfasserin aut Enthalten in Regional Environmental Change Springer-Verlag, 2001 16(2015), 7 vom: 12. Mai, Seite 2019-2032 (DE-627)SPR008808457 nnns volume:16 year:2015 number:7 day:12 month:05 pages:2019-2032 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0812-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 16 2015 7 12 05 2019-2032 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Regional Environmental Change 16(2015), 7 vom: 12. Mai, Seite 2019-2032 volume:16 year:2015 number:7 day:12 month:05 pages:2019-2032 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Regional Environmental Change 16(2015), 7 vom: 12. Mai, Seite 2019-2032 volume:16 year:2015 number:7 day:12 month:05 pages:2019-2032 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Treeline ecotone Mountain ecosystems Cultural ecosystem services Expert assessment Stakeholder analysis |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Regional Environmental Change |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Sarkki, Simo @@aut@@ Ficko, Andrej @@aut@@ Grunewald, Karsten @@aut@@ Nijnik, Maria @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-05-12T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR008808457 |
| id |
SPR008818924 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR008818924</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20201124052123.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201005s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10113-015-0812-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR008818924</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s10113-015-0812-3-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sarkki, Simo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The concept of ecosystem services (ES) is being increasingly applied in environmental governance and science. To safeguard key ES in changing and complex social–ecological systems such as treeline areas, we need to (1) map key ES in different types of treeline landscapes, (2) identify the stakeholders benefiting from and threatening ES, and (3) examine how ES could be governed more sustainably. We explore these questions in European treeline areas by using quantitative and qualitative social science techniques to analyse responses from a survey of local scientific experts in 20 altitudinal and polar treeline areas in 15 European countries. In contrast to the prevalent consideration of treeline areas as a single type of a social–ecological system, we show that European treeline areas can be divided into two types that significantly differ in the delivery of ES. Our analyses allowed us to categorize stakeholders according to their benefits from and threats to ES; “Green key players” formed the most numerous group, while smaller number of stakeholder groups was categorized as “Harmless crowd”, “Occasional stressors”, and “Risky users”. However, behaviour of stakeholders is very much site-specific. Of 595 pairs of stakeholders analysed, we found <5 EU-wide “Allies” and “Opponents”. Recommendations for improved governance include adjusting governance instruments to specific problems in divergent treeline systems and creating participatory structures where stakeholders better interact with scientists and can genuinely influence management decisions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Treeline ecotone</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mountain ecosystems</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cultural ecosystem services</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Expert assessment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Stakeholder analysis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ficko, Andrej</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Grunewald, Karsten</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nijnik, Maria</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Regional Environmental Change</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">16(2015), 7 vom: 12. Mai, Seite 2019-2032</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR008808457</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">day:12</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2019-2032</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0812-3</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="b">12</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">2019-2032</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Sarkki, Simo |
| spellingShingle |
Sarkki, Simo misc Treeline ecotone misc Mountain ecosystems misc Cultural ecosystem services misc Expert assessment misc Stakeholder analysis Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance |
| authorStr |
Sarkki, Simo |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR008808457 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance Treeline ecotone (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mountain ecosystems (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cultural ecosystem services (dpeaa)DE-He213 Expert assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Stakeholder analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Treeline ecotone misc Mountain ecosystems misc Cultural ecosystem services misc Expert assessment misc Stakeholder analysis |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Treeline ecotone misc Mountain ecosystems misc Cultural ecosystem services misc Expert assessment misc Stakeholder analysis |
| topic_browse |
misc Treeline ecotone misc Mountain ecosystems misc Cultural ecosystem services misc Expert assessment misc Stakeholder analysis |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Regional Environmental Change |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR008808457 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Regional Environmental Change |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR008808457 |
| title |
Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR008818924 (SPR)s10113-015-0812-3-e |
| title_full |
Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance |
| author_sort |
Sarkki, Simo |
| journal |
Regional Environmental Change |
| journalStr |
Regional Environmental Change |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
2019 |
| author_browse |
Sarkki, Simo Ficko, Andrej Grunewald, Karsten Nijnik, Maria |
| container_volume |
16 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Sarkki, Simo |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10113-015-0812-3 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
benefits from and threats to european treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance |
| title_auth |
Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance |
| abstract |
Abstract The concept of ecosystem services (ES) is being increasingly applied in environmental governance and science. To safeguard key ES in changing and complex social–ecological systems such as treeline areas, we need to (1) map key ES in different types of treeline landscapes, (2) identify the stakeholders benefiting from and threatening ES, and (3) examine how ES could be governed more sustainably. We explore these questions in European treeline areas by using quantitative and qualitative social science techniques to analyse responses from a survey of local scientific experts in 20 altitudinal and polar treeline areas in 15 European countries. In contrast to the prevalent consideration of treeline areas as a single type of a social–ecological system, we show that European treeline areas can be divided into two types that significantly differ in the delivery of ES. Our analyses allowed us to categorize stakeholders according to their benefits from and threats to ES; “Green key players” formed the most numerous group, while smaller number of stakeholder groups was categorized as “Harmless crowd”, “Occasional stressors”, and “Risky users”. However, behaviour of stakeholders is very much site-specific. Of 595 pairs of stakeholders analysed, we found <5 EU-wide “Allies” and “Opponents”. Recommendations for improved governance include adjusting governance instruments to specific problems in divergent treeline systems and creating participatory structures where stakeholders better interact with scientists and can genuinely influence management decisions. |
| abstractGer |
Abstract The concept of ecosystem services (ES) is being increasingly applied in environmental governance and science. To safeguard key ES in changing and complex social–ecological systems such as treeline areas, we need to (1) map key ES in different types of treeline landscapes, (2) identify the stakeholders benefiting from and threatening ES, and (3) examine how ES could be governed more sustainably. We explore these questions in European treeline areas by using quantitative and qualitative social science techniques to analyse responses from a survey of local scientific experts in 20 altitudinal and polar treeline areas in 15 European countries. In contrast to the prevalent consideration of treeline areas as a single type of a social–ecological system, we show that European treeline areas can be divided into two types that significantly differ in the delivery of ES. Our analyses allowed us to categorize stakeholders according to their benefits from and threats to ES; “Green key players” formed the most numerous group, while smaller number of stakeholder groups was categorized as “Harmless crowd”, “Occasional stressors”, and “Risky users”. However, behaviour of stakeholders is very much site-specific. Of 595 pairs of stakeholders analysed, we found <5 EU-wide “Allies” and “Opponents”. Recommendations for improved governance include adjusting governance instruments to specific problems in divergent treeline systems and creating participatory structures where stakeholders better interact with scientists and can genuinely influence management decisions. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract The concept of ecosystem services (ES) is being increasingly applied in environmental governance and science. To safeguard key ES in changing and complex social–ecological systems such as treeline areas, we need to (1) map key ES in different types of treeline landscapes, (2) identify the stakeholders benefiting from and threatening ES, and (3) examine how ES could be governed more sustainably. We explore these questions in European treeline areas by using quantitative and qualitative social science techniques to analyse responses from a survey of local scientific experts in 20 altitudinal and polar treeline areas in 15 European countries. In contrast to the prevalent consideration of treeline areas as a single type of a social–ecological system, we show that European treeline areas can be divided into two types that significantly differ in the delivery of ES. Our analyses allowed us to categorize stakeholders according to their benefits from and threats to ES; “Green key players” formed the most numerous group, while smaller number of stakeholder groups was categorized as “Harmless crowd”, “Occasional stressors”, and “Risky users”. However, behaviour of stakeholders is very much site-specific. Of 595 pairs of stakeholders analysed, we found <5 EU-wide “Allies” and “Opponents”. Recommendations for improved governance include adjusting governance instruments to specific problems in divergent treeline systems and creating participatory structures where stakeholders better interact with scientists and can genuinely influence management decisions. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
7 |
| title_short |
Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0812-3 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Ficko, Andrej Grunewald, Karsten Nijnik, Maria |
| author2Str |
Ficko, Andrej Grunewald, Karsten Nijnik, Maria |
| ppnlink |
SPR008808457 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10113-015-0812-3 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T23:19:17.134Z |
| _version_ |
1803601845561589761 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR008818924</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20201124052123.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201005s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10113-015-0812-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR008818924</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s10113-015-0812-3-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sarkki, Simo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The concept of ecosystem services (ES) is being increasingly applied in environmental governance and science. To safeguard key ES in changing and complex social–ecological systems such as treeline areas, we need to (1) map key ES in different types of treeline landscapes, (2) identify the stakeholders benefiting from and threatening ES, and (3) examine how ES could be governed more sustainably. We explore these questions in European treeline areas by using quantitative and qualitative social science techniques to analyse responses from a survey of local scientific experts in 20 altitudinal and polar treeline areas in 15 European countries. In contrast to the prevalent consideration of treeline areas as a single type of a social–ecological system, we show that European treeline areas can be divided into two types that significantly differ in the delivery of ES. Our analyses allowed us to categorize stakeholders according to their benefits from and threats to ES; “Green key players” formed the most numerous group, while smaller number of stakeholder groups was categorized as “Harmless crowd”, “Occasional stressors”, and “Risky users”. However, behaviour of stakeholders is very much site-specific. Of 595 pairs of stakeholders analysed, we found <5 EU-wide “Allies” and “Opponents”. Recommendations for improved governance include adjusting governance instruments to specific problems in divergent treeline systems and creating participatory structures where stakeholders better interact with scientists and can genuinely influence management decisions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Treeline ecotone</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mountain ecosystems</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cultural ecosystem services</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Expert assessment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Stakeholder analysis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ficko, Andrej</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Grunewald, Karsten</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nijnik, Maria</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Regional Environmental Change</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">16(2015), 7 vom: 12. Mai, Seite 2019-2032</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR008808457</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">day:12</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2019-2032</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0812-3</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="b">12</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">2019-2032</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400959 |