A review of strategies for wind damage assessment in Japanese forests

Abstract Forest management for minimizing wind damage risk requires predicting future wind damage as accurately as possible. However, previous studies carried out in Japan mostly focused on field observation and not on an extensive estimate of damage in various regions. This paper, therefore, aims t...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Kamimura, Kana [verfasserIn] Shiraishi, Norihiko

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2007

Schlagwörter:	Damage factors Mechanistic methods Risk assessment Wind damage

Anmerkung:	© The Japanese Forest Society and Springer 2007

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Journal of forest research - Tokyo : Springer, 1996, 12(2007), 3 vom: 04. Mai, Seite 162-176
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:12 ; year:2007 ; number:3 ; day:04 ; month:05 ; pages:162-176

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1007/s10310-007-0005-0

Katalog-ID:	SPR00942041X

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	SPR00942041X
003	DE-627
005	20230507184736.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	201005s2007 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1007/s10310-007-0005-0 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR00942041X
035			\|a (SPR)s10310-007-0005-0-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Kamimura, Kana \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	2	\|a A review of strategies for wind damage assessment in Japanese forests
264		1	\|c 2007
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © The Japanese Forest Society and Springer 2007
520			\|a Abstract Forest management for minimizing wind damage risk requires predicting future wind damage as accurately as possible. However, previous studies carried out in Japan mostly focused on field observation and not on an extensive estimate of damage in various regions. This paper, therefore, aims to understand better approaches to the assessment of wind damage in Japan. First, basic descriptions of wind damage were reviewed including the process and types of tree and stand failures. Several factors relating to wind damage were also described including biological factors and stand characteristics. Second, the current methods of wind damage risk assessment were classified such as (1) observational/empirical, (2) statistical, and (3) mechanistic methods. Of the current methods, the mechanistic methods were acceptable in terms of their prediction of wind damage using the mechanistic behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind pressure. Third, this paper reviewed previous case studies in Japan and showed that most studies of wind damage focused on particular typhoon events. Their conclusions might be difficult to apply to other settings for the estimation of future wind damage risk with the changes of stand condition (thinning, gap creation, etc.). Therefore, the mechanistic methods would be one of the most powerful approaches to estimate the possibility of future wind damage risk with changes of stand conditions. Further studies are required to develop the methods of wind damage risk assessment in Japan including the mechanical behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind (typhoon) phenomena.
650		4	\|a Damage factors \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Mechanistic methods \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Risk assessment \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Wind damage \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Shiraishi, Norihiko \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Journal of forest research \|d Tokyo : Springer, 1996 \|g 12(2007), 3 vom: 04. Mai, Seite 162-176 \|w (DE-627)363744819 \|w (DE-600)2104467-3 \|x 1610-7403 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:12 \|g year:2007 \|g number:3 \|g day:04 \|g month:05 \|g pages:162-176
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10310-007-0005-0 \|z lizenzpflichtig \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_120
912			\|a GBV_ILN_138
912			\|a GBV_ILN_150
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_266
912			\|a GBV_ILN_267
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2031
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2039
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2065
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2070
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2086
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2108
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2113
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2116
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2118
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2119
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2144
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2188
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2522
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4046
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4246
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4277
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4328
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 12 \|j 2007 \|e 3 \|b 04 \|c 05 \|h 162-176

Indexfelder

author_variant	k k kk n s ns
matchkey_str	article:16107403:2007----::rveosrtgefridaaeseset
hierarchy_sort_str	2007
publishDate	2007
allfields	10.1007/s10310-007-0005-0 doi (DE-627)SPR00942041X (SPR)s10310-007-0005-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kamimura, Kana verfasserin aut A review of strategies for wind damage assessment in Japanese forests 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Japanese Forest Society and Springer 2007 Abstract Forest management for minimizing wind damage risk requires predicting future wind damage as accurately as possible. However, previous studies carried out in Japan mostly focused on field observation and not on an extensive estimate of damage in various regions. This paper, therefore, aims to understand better approaches to the assessment of wind damage in Japan. First, basic descriptions of wind damage were reviewed including the process and types of tree and stand failures. Several factors relating to wind damage were also described including biological factors and stand characteristics. Second, the current methods of wind damage risk assessment were classified such as (1) observational/empirical, (2) statistical, and (3) mechanistic methods. Of the current methods, the mechanistic methods were acceptable in terms of their prediction of wind damage using the mechanistic behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind pressure. Third, this paper reviewed previous case studies in Japan and showed that most studies of wind damage focused on particular typhoon events. Their conclusions might be difficult to apply to other settings for the estimation of future wind damage risk with the changes of stand condition (thinning, gap creation, etc.). Therefore, the mechanistic methods would be one of the most powerful approaches to estimate the possibility of future wind damage risk with changes of stand conditions. Further studies are required to develop the methods of wind damage risk assessment in Japan including the mechanical behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind (typhoon) phenomena. Damage factors (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mechanistic methods (dpeaa)DE-He213 Risk assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wind damage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shiraishi, Norihiko aut Enthalten in Journal of forest research Tokyo : Springer, 1996 12(2007), 3 vom: 04. Mai, Seite 162-176 (DE-627)363744819 (DE-600)2104467-3 1610-7403 nnns volume:12 year:2007 number:3 day:04 month:05 pages:162-176 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10310-007-0005-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_266 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2007 3 04 05 162-176
spelling	10.1007/s10310-007-0005-0 doi (DE-627)SPR00942041X (SPR)s10310-007-0005-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kamimura, Kana verfasserin aut A review of strategies for wind damage assessment in Japanese forests 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Japanese Forest Society and Springer 2007 Abstract Forest management for minimizing wind damage risk requires predicting future wind damage as accurately as possible. However, previous studies carried out in Japan mostly focused on field observation and not on an extensive estimate of damage in various regions. This paper, therefore, aims to understand better approaches to the assessment of wind damage in Japan. First, basic descriptions of wind damage were reviewed including the process and types of tree and stand failures. Several factors relating to wind damage were also described including biological factors and stand characteristics. Second, the current methods of wind damage risk assessment were classified such as (1) observational/empirical, (2) statistical, and (3) mechanistic methods. Of the current methods, the mechanistic methods were acceptable in terms of their prediction of wind damage using the mechanistic behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind pressure. Third, this paper reviewed previous case studies in Japan and showed that most studies of wind damage focused on particular typhoon events. Their conclusions might be difficult to apply to other settings for the estimation of future wind damage risk with the changes of stand condition (thinning, gap creation, etc.). Therefore, the mechanistic methods would be one of the most powerful approaches to estimate the possibility of future wind damage risk with changes of stand conditions. Further studies are required to develop the methods of wind damage risk assessment in Japan including the mechanical behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind (typhoon) phenomena. Damage factors (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mechanistic methods (dpeaa)DE-He213 Risk assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wind damage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shiraishi, Norihiko aut Enthalten in Journal of forest research Tokyo : Springer, 1996 12(2007), 3 vom: 04. Mai, Seite 162-176 (DE-627)363744819 (DE-600)2104467-3 1610-7403 nnns volume:12 year:2007 number:3 day:04 month:05 pages:162-176 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10310-007-0005-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_266 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2007 3 04 05 162-176
allfields_unstemmed	10.1007/s10310-007-0005-0 doi (DE-627)SPR00942041X (SPR)s10310-007-0005-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kamimura, Kana verfasserin aut A review of strategies for wind damage assessment in Japanese forests 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Japanese Forest Society and Springer 2007 Abstract Forest management for minimizing wind damage risk requires predicting future wind damage as accurately as possible. However, previous studies carried out in Japan mostly focused on field observation and not on an extensive estimate of damage in various regions. This paper, therefore, aims to understand better approaches to the assessment of wind damage in Japan. First, basic descriptions of wind damage were reviewed including the process and types of tree and stand failures. Several factors relating to wind damage were also described including biological factors and stand characteristics. Second, the current methods of wind damage risk assessment were classified such as (1) observational/empirical, (2) statistical, and (3) mechanistic methods. Of the current methods, the mechanistic methods were acceptable in terms of their prediction of wind damage using the mechanistic behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind pressure. Third, this paper reviewed previous case studies in Japan and showed that most studies of wind damage focused on particular typhoon events. Their conclusions might be difficult to apply to other settings for the estimation of future wind damage risk with the changes of stand condition (thinning, gap creation, etc.). Therefore, the mechanistic methods would be one of the most powerful approaches to estimate the possibility of future wind damage risk with changes of stand conditions. Further studies are required to develop the methods of wind damage risk assessment in Japan including the mechanical behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind (typhoon) phenomena. Damage factors (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mechanistic methods (dpeaa)DE-He213 Risk assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wind damage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shiraishi, Norihiko aut Enthalten in Journal of forest research Tokyo : Springer, 1996 12(2007), 3 vom: 04. Mai, Seite 162-176 (DE-627)363744819 (DE-600)2104467-3 1610-7403 nnns volume:12 year:2007 number:3 day:04 month:05 pages:162-176 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10310-007-0005-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_266 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2007 3 04 05 162-176
allfieldsGer	10.1007/s10310-007-0005-0 doi (DE-627)SPR00942041X (SPR)s10310-007-0005-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kamimura, Kana verfasserin aut A review of strategies for wind damage assessment in Japanese forests 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Japanese Forest Society and Springer 2007 Abstract Forest management for minimizing wind damage risk requires predicting future wind damage as accurately as possible. However, previous studies carried out in Japan mostly focused on field observation and not on an extensive estimate of damage in various regions. This paper, therefore, aims to understand better approaches to the assessment of wind damage in Japan. First, basic descriptions of wind damage were reviewed including the process and types of tree and stand failures. Several factors relating to wind damage were also described including biological factors and stand characteristics. Second, the current methods of wind damage risk assessment were classified such as (1) observational/empirical, (2) statistical, and (3) mechanistic methods. Of the current methods, the mechanistic methods were acceptable in terms of their prediction of wind damage using the mechanistic behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind pressure. Third, this paper reviewed previous case studies in Japan and showed that most studies of wind damage focused on particular typhoon events. Their conclusions might be difficult to apply to other settings for the estimation of future wind damage risk with the changes of stand condition (thinning, gap creation, etc.). Therefore, the mechanistic methods would be one of the most powerful approaches to estimate the possibility of future wind damage risk with changes of stand conditions. Further studies are required to develop the methods of wind damage risk assessment in Japan including the mechanical behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind (typhoon) phenomena. Damage factors (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mechanistic methods (dpeaa)DE-He213 Risk assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wind damage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shiraishi, Norihiko aut Enthalten in Journal of forest research Tokyo : Springer, 1996 12(2007), 3 vom: 04. Mai, Seite 162-176 (DE-627)363744819 (DE-600)2104467-3 1610-7403 nnns volume:12 year:2007 number:3 day:04 month:05 pages:162-176 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10310-007-0005-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_266 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2007 3 04 05 162-176
allfieldsSound	10.1007/s10310-007-0005-0 doi (DE-627)SPR00942041X (SPR)s10310-007-0005-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kamimura, Kana verfasserin aut A review of strategies for wind damage assessment in Japanese forests 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Japanese Forest Society and Springer 2007 Abstract Forest management for minimizing wind damage risk requires predicting future wind damage as accurately as possible. However, previous studies carried out in Japan mostly focused on field observation and not on an extensive estimate of damage in various regions. This paper, therefore, aims to understand better approaches to the assessment of wind damage in Japan. First, basic descriptions of wind damage were reviewed including the process and types of tree and stand failures. Several factors relating to wind damage were also described including biological factors and stand characteristics. Second, the current methods of wind damage risk assessment were classified such as (1) observational/empirical, (2) statistical, and (3) mechanistic methods. Of the current methods, the mechanistic methods were acceptable in terms of their prediction of wind damage using the mechanistic behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind pressure. Third, this paper reviewed previous case studies in Japan and showed that most studies of wind damage focused on particular typhoon events. Their conclusions might be difficult to apply to other settings for the estimation of future wind damage risk with the changes of stand condition (thinning, gap creation, etc.). Therefore, the mechanistic methods would be one of the most powerful approaches to estimate the possibility of future wind damage risk with changes of stand conditions. Further studies are required to develop the methods of wind damage risk assessment in Japan including the mechanical behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind (typhoon) phenomena. Damage factors (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mechanistic methods (dpeaa)DE-He213 Risk assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wind damage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shiraishi, Norihiko aut Enthalten in Journal of forest research Tokyo : Springer, 1996 12(2007), 3 vom: 04. Mai, Seite 162-176 (DE-627)363744819 (DE-600)2104467-3 1610-7403 nnns volume:12 year:2007 number:3 day:04 month:05 pages:162-176 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10310-007-0005-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_266 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2007 3 04 05 162-176
language	English
source	Enthalten in Journal of forest research 12(2007), 3 vom: 04. Mai, Seite 162-176 volume:12 year:2007 number:3 day:04 month:05 pages:162-176
sourceStr	Enthalten in Journal of forest research 12(2007), 3 vom: 04. Mai, Seite 162-176 volume:12 year:2007 number:3 day:04 month:05 pages:162-176
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Damage factors Mechanistic methods Risk assessment Wind damage
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Journal of forest research
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Kamimura, Kana @@aut@@ Shiraishi, Norihiko @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2007-05-04T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	363744819
id	SPR00942041X
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR00942041X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230507184736.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201005s2007 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10310-007-0005-0</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR00942041X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s10310-007-0005-0-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kamimura, Kana</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A review of strategies for wind damage assessment in Japanese forests</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Japanese Forest Society and Springer 2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Forest management for minimizing wind damage risk requires predicting future wind damage as accurately as possible. However, previous studies carried out in Japan mostly focused on field observation and not on an extensive estimate of damage in various regions. This paper, therefore, aims to understand better approaches to the assessment of wind damage in Japan. First, basic descriptions of wind damage were reviewed including the process and types of tree and stand failures. Several factors relating to wind damage were also described including biological factors and stand characteristics. Second, the current methods of wind damage risk assessment were classified such as (1) observational/empirical, (2) statistical, and (3) mechanistic methods. Of the current methods, the mechanistic methods were acceptable in terms of their prediction of wind damage using the mechanistic behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind pressure. Third, this paper reviewed previous case studies in Japan and showed that most studies of wind damage focused on particular typhoon events. Their conclusions might be difficult to apply to other settings for the estimation of future wind damage risk with the changes of stand condition (thinning, gap creation, etc.). Therefore, the mechanistic methods would be one of the most powerful approaches to estimate the possibility of future wind damage risk with changes of stand conditions. Further studies are required to develop the methods of wind damage risk assessment in Japan including the mechanical behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind (typhoon) phenomena.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Damage factors</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mechanistic methods</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Risk assessment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wind damage</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shiraishi, Norihiko</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of forest research</subfield><subfield code="d">Tokyo : Springer, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2007), 3 vom: 04. Mai, Seite 162-176</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)363744819</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2104467-3</subfield><subfield code="x">1610-7403</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2007</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:04</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:162-176</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10310-007-0005-0</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_266</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2070</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2007</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">04</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">162-176</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Kamimura, Kana
spellingShingle	Kamimura, Kana misc Damage factors misc Mechanistic methods misc Risk assessment misc Wind damage A review of strategies for wind damage assessment in Japanese forests
authorStr	Kamimura, Kana
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)363744819
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1610-7403
topic_title	A review of strategies for wind damage assessment in Japanese forests Damage factors (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mechanistic methods (dpeaa)DE-He213 Risk assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wind damage (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	misc Damage factors misc Mechanistic methods misc Risk assessment misc Wind damage
topic_unstemmed	misc Damage factors misc Mechanistic methods misc Risk assessment misc Wind damage
topic_browse	misc Damage factors misc Mechanistic methods misc Risk assessment misc Wind damage
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Journal of forest research
hierarchy_parent_id	363744819
hierarchy_top_title	Journal of forest research
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)363744819 (DE-600)2104467-3
title	A review of strategies for wind damage assessment in Japanese forests
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR00942041X (SPR)s10310-007-0005-0-e
title_full	A review of strategies for wind damage assessment in Japanese forests
author_sort	Kamimura, Kana
journal	Journal of forest research
journalStr	Journal of forest research
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2007
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	162
author_browse	Kamimura, Kana Shiraishi, Norihiko
container_volume	12
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Kamimura, Kana
doi_str_mv	10.1007/s10310-007-0005-0
title_sort	review of strategies for wind damage assessment in japanese forests
title_auth	A review of strategies for wind damage assessment in Japanese forests
abstract	Abstract Forest management for minimizing wind damage risk requires predicting future wind damage as accurately as possible. However, previous studies carried out in Japan mostly focused on field observation and not on an extensive estimate of damage in various regions. This paper, therefore, aims to understand better approaches to the assessment of wind damage in Japan. First, basic descriptions of wind damage were reviewed including the process and types of tree and stand failures. Several factors relating to wind damage were also described including biological factors and stand characteristics. Second, the current methods of wind damage risk assessment were classified such as (1) observational/empirical, (2) statistical, and (3) mechanistic methods. Of the current methods, the mechanistic methods were acceptable in terms of their prediction of wind damage using the mechanistic behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind pressure. Third, this paper reviewed previous case studies in Japan and showed that most studies of wind damage focused on particular typhoon events. Their conclusions might be difficult to apply to other settings for the estimation of future wind damage risk with the changes of stand condition (thinning, gap creation, etc.). Therefore, the mechanistic methods would be one of the most powerful approaches to estimate the possibility of future wind damage risk with changes of stand conditions. Further studies are required to develop the methods of wind damage risk assessment in Japan including the mechanical behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind (typhoon) phenomena. © The Japanese Forest Society and Springer 2007
abstractGer	Abstract Forest management for minimizing wind damage risk requires predicting future wind damage as accurately as possible. However, previous studies carried out in Japan mostly focused on field observation and not on an extensive estimate of damage in various regions. This paper, therefore, aims to understand better approaches to the assessment of wind damage in Japan. First, basic descriptions of wind damage were reviewed including the process and types of tree and stand failures. Several factors relating to wind damage were also described including biological factors and stand characteristics. Second, the current methods of wind damage risk assessment were classified such as (1) observational/empirical, (2) statistical, and (3) mechanistic methods. Of the current methods, the mechanistic methods were acceptable in terms of their prediction of wind damage using the mechanistic behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind pressure. Third, this paper reviewed previous case studies in Japan and showed that most studies of wind damage focused on particular typhoon events. Their conclusions might be difficult to apply to other settings for the estimation of future wind damage risk with the changes of stand condition (thinning, gap creation, etc.). Therefore, the mechanistic methods would be one of the most powerful approaches to estimate the possibility of future wind damage risk with changes of stand conditions. Further studies are required to develop the methods of wind damage risk assessment in Japan including the mechanical behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind (typhoon) phenomena. © The Japanese Forest Society and Springer 2007
abstract_unstemmed	Abstract Forest management for minimizing wind damage risk requires predicting future wind damage as accurately as possible. However, previous studies carried out in Japan mostly focused on field observation and not on an extensive estimate of damage in various regions. This paper, therefore, aims to understand better approaches to the assessment of wind damage in Japan. First, basic descriptions of wind damage were reviewed including the process and types of tree and stand failures. Several factors relating to wind damage were also described including biological factors and stand characteristics. Second, the current methods of wind damage risk assessment were classified such as (1) observational/empirical, (2) statistical, and (3) mechanistic methods. Of the current methods, the mechanistic methods were acceptable in terms of their prediction of wind damage using the mechanistic behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind pressure. Third, this paper reviewed previous case studies in Japan and showed that most studies of wind damage focused on particular typhoon events. Their conclusions might be difficult to apply to other settings for the estimation of future wind damage risk with the changes of stand condition (thinning, gap creation, etc.). Therefore, the mechanistic methods would be one of the most powerful approaches to estimate the possibility of future wind damage risk with changes of stand conditions. Further studies are required to develop the methods of wind damage risk assessment in Japan including the mechanical behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind (typhoon) phenomena. © The Japanese Forest Society and Springer 2007
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_266 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	3
title_short	A review of strategies for wind damage assessment in Japanese forests
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10310-007-0005-0
remote_bool	true
author2	Shiraishi, Norihiko
author2Str	Shiraishi, Norihiko
ppnlink	363744819
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1007/s10310-007-0005-0
up_date	2024-07-04T01:59:21.671Z
_version_	1803611916665356288
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR00942041X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230507184736.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201005s2007 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10310-007-0005-0</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR00942041X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s10310-007-0005-0-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kamimura, Kana</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A review of strategies for wind damage assessment in Japanese forests</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Japanese Forest Society and Springer 2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Forest management for minimizing wind damage risk requires predicting future wind damage as accurately as possible. However, previous studies carried out in Japan mostly focused on field observation and not on an extensive estimate of damage in various regions. This paper, therefore, aims to understand better approaches to the assessment of wind damage in Japan. First, basic descriptions of wind damage were reviewed including the process and types of tree and stand failures. Several factors relating to wind damage were also described including biological factors and stand characteristics. Second, the current methods of wind damage risk assessment were classified such as (1) observational/empirical, (2) statistical, and (3) mechanistic methods. Of the current methods, the mechanistic methods were acceptable in terms of their prediction of wind damage using the mechanistic behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind pressure. Third, this paper reviewed previous case studies in Japan and showed that most studies of wind damage focused on particular typhoon events. Their conclusions might be difficult to apply to other settings for the estimation of future wind damage risk with the changes of stand condition (thinning, gap creation, etc.). Therefore, the mechanistic methods would be one of the most powerful approaches to estimate the possibility of future wind damage risk with changes of stand conditions. Further studies are required to develop the methods of wind damage risk assessment in Japan including the mechanical behaviour of tree and stand as a result of wind (typhoon) phenomena.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Damage factors</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mechanistic methods</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Risk assessment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wind damage</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shiraishi, Norihiko</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of forest research</subfield><subfield code="d">Tokyo : Springer, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2007), 3 vom: 04. Mai, Seite 162-176</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)363744819</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2104467-3</subfield><subfield code="x">1610-7403</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2007</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:04</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:162-176</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10310-007-0005-0</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_266</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2070</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2007</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">04</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">162-176</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4001894

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

A review of strategies for wind damage assessment in Japanese forests

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?